Flare energy and fast electrons via Alfvén waves H. S. Hudson & L. Fletcher SSL/Berkeley and...
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Flare energy and fast electrons via Alfvén waves H. S. Hudson & L. Fletcher SSL/Berkeley and...
Flare energy and fast electrons via Alfvén waves
H. S. Hudson & L. Fletcher
SSL/Berkeley and Glasgow U.
Predictions for Hinode/SOT flare observations
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
GONG
SOHO/MDI
BLOS Maps BLOS Maps
Sudol & Harvey (2005), X10 flare of 2003 Oct. 29
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Flare of 2001 Aug. 25GONG + TRACE 1600A
Other examples withGOES times
The changes are stepwise, of order10% of the line-of-sight field, andprimarily occur at the impulsive phase of the flare
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Replacing the thick-target model
• Large-scale restructuring => flare energy
• Energy transport by Alfvén-mode waves, not electrons
• The “jerk” as an alternative source of seismic waves
Fletcher & Hudson 2007
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Unknowns in the new scenario
• The partition of flare energy release into Alfvén mode and fast mode is unknown
• There are clear possibilities for electron acceleration not involving beams, but little development in the literature
• The role of fast-mode waves is not so evident in 3D, but mode conversion guarantees their presence
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
High Alfvén speeds
• Solar astronomers (those not familiar with radio astronomy?) commonly underestimate active-region field strengths and Alfvén speeds
• vA = 3 x 104 km/s is certainly possible (500 G, 109 cm-3)
• The condition < me/mp is also certainly possible, hence inertial Alfvén waves
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
The McClymont “jerk”
• Yohkoh and Mees observations of rapid sunspot motion during the flare of 15 Nov. 1991
• Estimate of jerk penetration depth of 1.2 Mm in 4 min
• Energy coupling estimated at 3x1029 to 2x1030 ergs
Anwar et al., Solar Phys. 147, 287 (1993)
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Predictions of Hinode B variation(B => B+b during flare)
• Coronal implosion (Hudson 2000)• Iz = constant (Melrose) - Difference field b is potential - Ampere’s law integral is an easy test• Conjugate McClymont jerks
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Electrodynamics of the collapsing trap
• Betatron acceleration
• Fermi acceleration
• Inductive energy release via chromospheric “electrojet”
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
A more physically correct flare theory
• Obayashi (1975) and Hudson (2000) got it right: A flare represents a collapse of the stressed coronal field
• Flare theories must incorporate the full tensor conductivity in the chromosphere
• The role of reconnection has been greatly overstated
• We do not need a “black box” electron accelerator in the corona; the energy transport is via Alfvén waves instead
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Conclusions
• The pattern of field changes may make it possible to identify the physics of flare causation and energy supply
• The “McClymont Jerk” could play a role in launching flare seismic waves
• We should encourage research related to the Hinode observations of before/after vector fields, both theoretical and observational
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
End
Thanks for discussion and input: George Fisher, Bernhard Kliem, Brian Welsch…
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Death to the thick target
• Spatial scales have become very small and make extreme requirements
- extreme particle distribution functions
- strong self-field
- “number problem”
• The “dentist’s mirror” of albedo shows no significant X-ray directivity
• The occurrence distribution of >100 keV events shows no significant directivity
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
H. Wang, 1993(cf. Anwar et al., 1993)
First clear evidence for flare-associated field changes?
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Giovanelli (1948)Gold & Hoyle (1961)
Longcope & Noonan (2000)Anzer & Pneuman (1982)
A Cartoon
Sampler
http://solarmuri.ssl.berkeley.edu/~hhudson/cartoons/
Priest & Milne (1980)
Hudson (2000)
Liu et al. (2005)
Kosugi memorial, April 27 2007
Courtesy Török & Kliem
Notes: (1) This simulation shows a kink instability.(2) The simulation has no realistic chromosphere, so the current
patterns are merely illustrative at this time.(3) The simulation does not connect one equilibrium state with
another.
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor
are needed to see this picture.