-84{ \r4 trq Name & Designation cniei Period worked q-i sit cm Reporting Authority

Tacilcbei col Reviewing Authority AffiTh-t Accepting Authority

IND° TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORC # PAHA

GOVT. OF INDIA

(fl.44I c1 3itrwrftzt c opt f*,414-1 m(ld4-1) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (APAR) OF GAZETTED OFFICERS

(fl6iqct) t9Tt" (1d1 (q) (For Assistant Commandant to Dy. Inspector General (LEGAL)

I-TFT —1 Part —1 dcb cl 31-af4 m't tql‹.-1 te4.414,-1

APAR for the period from to

1. altl-Wrtf -114-1 Name of the officer

2. qei Regt. No.

3. s4-4-1 &t1--0 Date of birth

4 tlariztr- Educational qualification

5. qJITIff Present grade

6. qthIM tiq Present post

7. 4dlif1 tr4 f4zfrf cl fd-% Date of appointment to present post

8. vrat4-9-, 3T17 ctifi)m-rtr Reporting, Reviewing and Accepting Authorities

9. It-ft/4 lam 3T-Tiftv-m• Ti 31-4iW Period of absence on leave/ training, etc.

3i-q-fr Period uuf1 Remarks

rF On leave vffraTur LR On training

10. 31 /31f97(te-qico-1 T1) Awards/Honours (assessment year)

11. MiNq•-1/ T-IRAch•-1 3110MIt1 fera-A- -8(st 4, 4)1 w14-1 +teq14).-i 141.0d‹ -r fi Tr fir Details of APARs of personnel not written by the officer as reporting/

reviewing authority for the previous year

12. R'1 /494-GN t ,<-14-8Lo 39-Pcrit ft T4 1 /4TH-8 cwt.) c6) fdtr Date of filing Annual Property Return for the year ending December

13 s41-4 fat- Date of medical examination (Attach copy of the medical report)

• 2

1T17-2 Part — II 3TRIW141 Adq-t ftai v11-)

To be filled in by the officer reported upon

oco 12.1" 3Tilt TN 4)14 Yr Tf t it-477 71 ft 300 Y1641 tf 31-R1- -1 0-11 vrW R4f4Tr 1'44R-or Tr -o-u9- fir 31' 4))i 31reME plc 91. el+Ili

Brief description of duties of the officer reported upon during the period from to not exceeding 300 words. Brief resume to be confined in the space allotted and no additional sheet allowed.

2. 4114 &-s7/30Zzi/t471 3TRT4 too 3TErk f4qtftu 1-4)4 r1, zn. f4P-Tiftff f+1- TTY?

(414.11}r/ ii-An zrr wRri m't 31T5-4t1 vT21-Prw-d-r N-RTR 0.-I'. 3t1R ct) &Lzr 1 3Tuft

ztrait- Icilq (.3416,01 fq 3T1 vlurr z Ri 4)14 zrl-A-9.0 Please specify targets/objectives/goals (in quantitative or other terms) of work you set for yourself or that were set for you, eight to ten items or work in the order of priority and your achievement against each target. (Example: Annual Action Plan for your Division)

•ucraftizti Achievements Fazi/3014"4/T1174 Targets/Objectives/Goals

:: 3 ::

3. 4e-411 4,1-4 2 c61 grfef , g) r 34a)-cr -€1- co I 4 Vrfkr ct))

-q-Jiq I Please state briefly, the shortfalls with reference to the targets/objectives/goals referred to in item 2. Please specify constraints, if any, in achieving the targets.

Date

4. --711 39. 41 • Th-T cr) " 1:914 TIThaf 31tr- 31:FFfrf 3 3914 3T1:14 I I -I TT 1111 ct)

Please also indicate items in which there have been significantly higher achievements and your

contribution thereto.

11M-3 PART-III 1A-41141-d- 014 f*Lilq.-1 it=r1-8

DEMONSTRATIVE PERFORMANCE REPORT

1.) 1. itapill ql,fl-i 30-ff *ck. (7.31-r.R./7.tr.3ir., Ti-r-4-th- , Tr. Standard achieved during inspection (AIA/ATI, CIPHER, MT.)

2. alt.t. 31taT q I,-cl 4 /-1>;1 `1 BPET:-Qualified/Not qualified

3. 7.3TRAN 4). TI.Rizi. t-t).. . 1.y41. 3cflrcri ARCF:MM,FC,SS Fail --i'. 4. --iitzll 1- q ii.sf tffIT afTiQff # AI 11

Interest taken in organizing on the job training of men training.

5. c mDieTur ql,fl-i 3TP-4a \,-cv Standard achieved during collective

6. Th:Iff cOV cf)0 'TT faq7131-Details of Pending Court Cases

u ul,fl-t FlWrd. *Rt -f'grd- , 6.) -- cokui, 3177 if

u ,t1,1 "lut“) +I u -- u ,fl.1 42,c1 'a-Pird• 4 -it-cut No. of courtcat

cases pending during the year

Reason of pendency, any

''t ,4-itsut No. of court cases disposed off during the year

\'-iszli Total No. of court cases'3=1): pending during the year

31f4Wr1 -c-1 laT7 Signature of Officer

4

9-Fr —4 PART — IV (I)

1l1- ‹.-1/T1 cfri 111fl chl gFRT 4igq ict)'I ASSESSMENT BY REPORTING/REVIEVING AUTHOleY

t. tky41010 coilcfrol r itgkur ul i q.-r it rear 911 ,t)ra wren f i vliHr t 1-10 tba-r TR 61-if m- rt 10ft WAT 10 A-oft m-T u-ARN. cmcii t Numerical grading is to be awarded by reporting and reviewing authority which should be on a scale of 1-10, where 1 refers to the lowest grade and 10 to the highest.

(v441- tr-6-a 'Rya f4tzil arm A truA) (Please read carefully the guidelines before filling the entries)

(31.) tt-114-1 tei-110-1 (**f 1-71- 45T 1-TH 40% 6 11 )

(A) Assessment of work output (weightage to this Section would be 40%. )

wi vrItt47 varcli Admn. Reporting Authority.

\5ql-44o'rwff 91 ola Admn. Reviewing Authority

\v{ i9f46'w 9Acidt 31714N Admn. Initial of Reviewing Auth.

-KR i. ii, q 0 4)14 r iftvidr/ f -ti-zT *31 TR 3Wedff itzu Tali cottl

Accomplishment of planned work/ work allotted as per subjects allotted.

-11t ii. 01 0114-1 Quality of output

iii. z quIlc4-14) 11117Tdi Analytical ability

. -$1. iv. 31441401410-10 4)14 Iftutdf /f)? TR 319c-TATff 4114 Accomplishment of exceptional

work/ unforeseen tasks performed f4 cm uR vi fkaW illefrur Overall Grading on 'Work output'. = (Total Score ± 4 X 0.4)

M. al 4id 1:4 fi r3It r temo-i (57{ 1-TR 30% 6 ,11 )

(B) Assessment of personal attributes (weightage to this Section would be 30%)

R54 I 141 44 11il ici,i Admn. Reporting Authority.

Rvi pll-dt vTRct Admn. Reviewing Authority

t I44-- 91 ola * 31-rum Admn. Initial of Reviewing Auth.

i. cold 3Tftr-lit Attitude to work

ii. D 41 MI 41T Sense of responsibility

iii. 3TIVITiTff Tr 3T-TePT Maintenance of Discipline

iv. *I tl 1 Eiliffl7 Communication skills

v. Ap $ 7 Leadership qualities vi. Tc I91 4 vii ct $t aiTral

Capacity to work in team spirit - t vii. \9,i4 Tut 3TTITTa1 cm.)- afFr-di

Capacity to work in time limit viii. tRiT17 al Id til.

Inter-personal relations u4 +RIfaOrdf3i1 IR (12,6 itaP7 5TITM-R7 Overall Grading on personal attributes = (Total Score - 8 X 0.3)

:: 5 :: Tiaird1 Th-T tc-Llic0-1 (6fl 7.TITT r 7-TTR. 30: 6 ,I1)

ent of functional competencywei htage to this Section would be 30%)

Authority.

ir grfeo9 laili)opFr Admit. Reporting

wi T-t d cr-r critm-rt Admn. Reviewing Authority

11 TI cl CPi ATRWtt *

31TtlaR Admn. Initial of Reviewing Auth.

i. ftzr1-1/ftfdIFII/coi 74 zlITzEdi a)-- A Mtztrq 0 \i•-ic411{47 4 ,,tfrict,01 Knowledge of Rules/Regulations/ Procedures in the area of function and ability to apply them correctly.

ii. tit44 zi)v9i 61-0 t am-dr Strategic planning ability

iii. iqui-zi (,),)- t -ztrzr-d-r Decision making ability

iv. alirdT Coordination ability \1-1 41-0 v) 314.9- 2T 0 Mb cm 0 f4---ftr-d ct)A t

aTITUT Ability to motivate and develop subordinates

wPtqloicr, Tratitifi tR ct3er fifiFn7 ;ThorWuT Overall Grading on functional competency = (Total Score ± 5 X 0.3)

2. gftaro-r Training 3TRI-wrt \T 4oi4 a-T4-d-r3T1 3T i 31t1- •RyIN 31't Ift ct), -qf -0 .3-1 fa-q

I) (Please give recommendations for training with a view to further improving the effectiveness and capabilities of the officer)

3. *110-If State of health

4 q-I 31-RIM-Tt g 3-TrqThlt iticii31)" TC417 (CWT— 100 zr)- 4), •-11,-1221 E -crq

\i-r-nocia qf 31-PUP 711fcT t 1

Pen picture by reporting officer (in about 100 words) on the overall qualities of the officer including area of strengths and lesser strength, extraordinary achievements, significant failures and attitude towards weaker sections.

5. itzltdt9 31 Wit 31-Tftd F1t/31—girtc ‘11-1kilIra W=M)-R.

3-42ar fq 4)1,4 cr).) ,4-14-1*{ 3T T r itaTur

Specific comments on the attitude of the officer reported upon towards Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Weaker Sections of the Society, his understanding and his willingness to deal with them.

:: 6 ::

6. *1c4-Aedl Integrity *Lir 3Titrwrf1 mat ‘LictAbit q lt-ccruft (Please comments on the integrity of the officer)

7. 11-0 1-Trr-4(1) 3TTEIR tR ctri rAcilct) cacirM (3++-icf)

Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in part -4 (I) of the Report (A+B+C)

grd-ke7 311trm-Itt ew Signature of Admn. Reporting Authority

04) 3T8it Name in Block Letters L144114-I Designation

ITRI. — 4 PART — IV(II)

ki--41i i9f4--dtw9 3Tft—c-41 mpr 3P-lifki ADMN REMARKS OF THE REVIEWING AUTHORITY

1. Tif4c1 4)-1 3T ft3T4-9. 414 .4)01 4 31- 1.

Length of service under the Reviewing officer

2. a-9-f4

31-f0m7qt gm Wali -d--it" I coc.Lizti tv-iicilt4-1 Ti (FITITIT 100 41r4 if) 1iT4 3Tftrwrtt t14-Itcl fk`AN-M311

3 1 i4 44I1 .* mac 3ft-P ITT fifiF t 1 Pen Picture by reviewing Officer. Please comment (in about 100 words on the overall qualities of the officer including area of strengths and lesser strength and his attitude towards weaker sections.)

3. f4Wit c i 1-1—td1 $1 vit1471 f4-47a1" Tiftd ittIT .7,1q Remarks by the Reviewing Officer to indicate specifically the differences, if any, with the assessment made by the Reporting Officer, and the reasons therefore.

::7::

4. 3Tf0-wrt1 ,<61 t c16 3T oro /3To7o -ro

f+-zrr ,riN 14) (NI fer8 f ale) 3-ifrwt -q-rf/3Too -To 31-f 5i l 014 ftzthur rg5T 3fTrtt t If the officer reported upon is a member of SC/ST please indicate specifically whether the attitude of the Reporting officer in assessing the performance of the SC/ST has been fair & just.

5. "1 -1 1-117T-4 (1 ) 1 TTR 1.-TRiTT 311tTR R- (-114.)H \'-N.-q-1 I 014,

cl cb (3T-P4+) Overall numerical grading on the basis of weightage given in Part- 4 (I) of the Report. (A+B+C)

Ti (4 ei 4) iulI cta Signature of the Admn Reviewing Authority

•(114, 3TaTt

Name in Block Letters Llq-114-1

Designation

Part-V (To be filled by Technical Reviewing Authortiy)

1 (A) Assessment of work output /professional competency (weightage to this section would be 40%)

Technical Reviewing Authority

Initial of Technical Authority

cnizi of uidi/ fdg4 31W tR 311e0 ftzrr TRH 04

Accomplishment of planned work/ work allotted as per subjects allotted.

(PI 1-13-114-1 1 -1-ft Quality of output -Rtiutic+-Ict) 474-dr Analytical ability

iv. Intelligence and Output v. Attention paid toward: a) Court case b) NHRC case c) NGOs d) Legal advise to various service matters vi) Presentation of Court cases and other cases vii) Knowledge of Rules, Codes, Manuals, Instructions & procedure viii) Capacity to advise legal matters and promptness in disposal of work ix) Pursuing and monitoring the matters of the JAG Branch/place of Posting x) Quality of scrutiny and drafting xi) Command on the legal terminology & English language Total Score (X) Average Score= X/11= Y Weightage 40% = Yx0.4=A

in professional matters (weightage to this

Technical Reviewing Authority

Initial of Technical Reviewing Authority

i. Knowledge of rules/ Acts/codes/ regulations/procedures in the area of function and ability to as sly correctly. ii. Coordination ability

iii. Strategic Planning ability iv. Decision making ability

v. Ability to motivate and develop subordinates vi. Initiatives

Total Score (X) Average Score= X/6=Y Weightage 30%=Yx0.3=C

::8:: (b)Assessment of personal attributes (weightage to this Section would be 30%)

Technical Reviewing Initial of Technic.. • Authority Reviewing Authority

i. Attitude to work ii Professional ethics

iii. Inter personal relationships

iv. Presence of mind and confidence in rofessional matters

v. Sobriety, maturity & amenability to discipline vi. Intellectual honesty, creativity and innovative qualities vii. Intelligence, tact, courtesy and self confidence in professional matters viii. Ability to work in a team. ix. Ability to search case law and research x. Compilation and development of the latest Judgment, now legal development and updated legal knowledge Total Score (X) Average Score= X/10= Y Weightage 30% = Yx0.3=B

(C) Assessment of functional competency Section would be 30%)

2. Attitude of the officer towards Women, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Weaker

Section of the Society, his understanding and willingness to deal with them.

3. Professional Ethics

:9::

4. PEN-PICTURE OF THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON BY TECHNICAL REVIEWING AUTHORITY

The Technical Reviewing Officer is required to indicate whether he agrees with resume of work as indicated by the officer, his comments on the overall qualities of the officer including areas of strength and lesser strength and his attitude towards the weaker section.

5. Overall numerical grading on the basis of Weightage given in Part-V(A+B+C) of the report On a score of 1-10(A+B+C)

Place: Date:

ITITr-6 PART—VI 4D6,4-c-new cp utc Nitwit -et few.11

REMARKS OF THE COUNTERSIGNING/ACCEPTING AUTHORITY (31.24-1 3ITRIT aitWt)/(i.e. Next Superior Officer)

1. cm' 31ruf <-1 / rti4ei14o-t 31-frwrtr c 31-PRI-W .164-1c1 t

Do you agree with the remarks of the reporting/reviewing authorities?

2. 4 f4----d7 4 c II \3 -1c11 I F4-4Rur Trf8- cow,' itzrr viN Comments on the remarks of the reporting/reviewing authority and details of difference of opinion, if any, with reasons for the same.

3. -itszIlc-1-14, 440.01— Zh17 1 t 10 cyr) 11-111.-4 -4 5 -4 T 317E7 1:17 4;1 cd I ct) N. I

Overall numerical grading- On a score of 1-10 On the basis of weightage given in Part- 4 & 5 of the Report.

't-c-11a-W 11 l ltia col Signature of Countersigning Authority

-rai TREF Mit Name in Block Letters

Designation

Signature of Technical Reviewing Authortiy (Name in Block letters and Designation)

10

1.

Guidelines retardintf ilin us of APARs with numerical

(g) m-R1 f4Ern--4-9' -4IFftwA ft48f gR arrAVT \-r4 RiT4q-it

1-TRT 7-R I The columns in the APAR should be filled with due care and attention and after devoting

adequate time.

31-48ir 171-01 t it 1 31t141 2 't IWT titIT (Th-Tzt NTU-diF 3T21-41 z11 TITM" re

f41--57-UT31)' TRT 49-fitwR TTREITU Ttf .R1-gritIM f314 Wm WkTITT 3117 Tkir ;IMR, 9 3t2tqt 10

T1Z 31:17recT-41 Ti-OETT1 :1-R1-#41--d Rk9 ItTIT 7TcrI1T I 1-2 3121-41 9-10 WE

31--futwur Te-d-q z9m-r 3ftftTzr f' c.6) 31-rq-zzTwm t itt8 q0.

rtt (a-4mm 31-ftrwitt) Ti-LwroTT v-4-m wR-0" Trgrzr z-4,r 3TRT-cti w11-m 3rd 310

m`l d1 r f 311.- I

It is expected that any grading of 1 or 2 (against work output or attributes or overall grade) would be

adequately justified in the pen-picture by way of specific failures and similarly, any grade of 9 or 10 would be justified with respect to specific accomplishments. Grades of 1-2 or 9-10 are expected to be

them. In awarding a numerical grade the reporting and rare occurrences and hence the need to ju sti fy reviewing authorities should rate the officer against a larger population of his/her peers that may be

currently working under them.

(1z11Tc1W1 Tffn*9. f3c1)8 f9-4 8 10 1 Tr i .)s 1;r-4-m itq TrR t, -Prr9T

ITT 311-R• 311--gu 3i fi - cst +Iu1-11* 3-t t 9 ItR Wq11

APARs graded between 8 and 10 will be rated as 'outstanding' and will be given a score of 9 for the purpose of calculating average scores for empanelment/promotion.

(1:13T) Th-Rt i3E1-18 f 6 .si-4 8 t W49. T 1.)Z 1T4T-ff 14,q TN

34-01." 4-11.11 71\1ITT 311- 3-4 7 iZq

APARs graded graded between 6 and short of 8 will be rated as 'very good' and will be given a score of 7.

(31.) 1t11 qrfif 1'4EM-4-9. TffirtW9. f3u1 •I'''"9-# 4 \-1--4 6, 6 t r T> T t -4)Z -DN 11-R t, "31W0T-

71RIET 3117 31 5 aiT 7174- APARs graded between 4 and 6 short of 6 will be rated as 'good' and given a score of 5.

(317) tkl't Th-fd f4ECir-4- TLFW f4T-It8 f 4 0.41 lt, .qffr ftar wkurr

APARs grade below 4 will be given a score of zero.

2. itt-8 f 3ff4wrt 79-Ri-gcr qr6T -45-ra-R fmft A 11-RAT wf87 7-of

aTRr--cttz,zkertirR4 q -AvarAN-1---d-rt

The column relating to "Public Relations" need wit he to be filled in by the ct Reporting of

h members ficer

the only where the

duties of the officer reported upon are such that comes in conta of public.

3. qrA ARA A f'41 =r1"6ftra Treoft 3crAr4 7 The following procedure should be followed in

filling up the column relating to integrity.

i) tgitatt 81f tcrtzr zrat tR War wAT

q)-

3i-QT 4m=r- rffizT r3 A tizio .#`27( Thct Tf- T4 vi-oircF f41-1-71fizr d

izR Tftrt-zr wit-at 3121-41 f4 )1st wrcrffr w4 tra -WMqTiliT -WO f)isTrq

Rtit8 urrA A Tzrr. Tfrer vrgrrit

-kzrzr)-rr ftzrr wIl I r 3i fir ttzrzr m-Rur 11-RT - r frrAtr-d- -rzt-4R-rmt8

Wftart Supervisory officer should maintain a confidential diary in which instances which create suspicion about the integrity of a subordinate should be noted from time to time and action to verify the truth of such suspicion should be taken expeditiously

E by making confidential time enqui of

re ries ording departmental

the ly Annual r by

referring the matter to the Special Police stablishment . Performance Assessment Report, this diary should be consulted and the material in it utilized for filling in the column relating to integrity. If the c not olumn is fille on account of the unconfirmed nature of the suspicions, further action should be taken in accordance with the following sub-

paragraphs.

TrcalTolT titrr 'TM .4rft -171 f45:1 IPA t4zT itlTir—fir • ji

radin

:: \-R-LPtoi cO1c141 chl l Ts5-1-4T 3TY7 tf4Tct Alic-qf)t61 411 A I4)

3f1-R. \46.01 c.1, 31-6-Tr tvci -11c r, R1ru c 1 fist \yv 3T1-7 3-TW1 cp1,101 cb") I The column pertaining to integrity in the Character Roll should be left blank and a separate secret note about the doubts and suspicions regarding the Government servants integrity should be recorded simultaneously and followed up.

iii) ,Z-Ict)c) t f ri flV-00)- Oct) - `1' flc411*01 411 14 ‘LIY1q c c4i c-Mc) ct) 71. it1)-8/

4,1 cp 4Wc1lc1 u1) VOW •11 . t 371A •2111Lc1 c 3TZTT trzrN1- TI-Frt

-161 t I L•4) #Fr-A )cict.) 3Twor uz 31-r4 4 31-qtr -1\sk 7Rt

Vfit 41,4, \3.& uI6i c-14) arOtT4 VIZ -rzi -R-4-P-6-tr 0.) 1 -R. 314TR fifia-4 clic) 1-141

\311q. There may be cases in which after a secret report/note has been recorded expressing suspicion about a Government servant's integrity, the inquiries that follow do not disclose sufficient material to remove the suspicion or to confirm it. In such a case, the Government servant's conduct should be watched for a further period, and, in the meantime, he should, as far as practicable, be kept away from positions in which there are opportunities for indulging in corrupt practices.

iv) 3i4R17 31TO. * v1tsf f3ul f 41(11 31-frwr-tr 3T17 f tft i \TH.) 41 c4 cico

-441zN-1,0 k \1ce•Pt61 M4-111.610 c3T T T led-WF Mfg 3T um t÷fl RAT 41 1 0.) ER-

f4A-r#TuraT col ,y-c1 itqV •i61 cirr •dcpcii t Trw4 ,3-10 1N4,1 11 ItRTT 17R0 . 01-9- A -4qT-Td. t 3ftft48f 41 31-Rritt col .3,dcp coi4 T€r#

-10 31 3. ‘3.161 trqt ftcht ft.q14 (Ile) 3TRItit cl6c1 TifUITT 3T4f4 f+-zrr

3T0qT e1 31-qW T 3Tff z17 er 711ff 1=171-61 14, f411)-8 .11-4. clic) 31-rqtit ch)-1c.411*61 cr4c144 A

*\'-f Ell .4 ct) Taft qufTh7-14T -r1%7 -uT1-4 4oi4 TR Trtri-c ,t11-141 -1vk -9-et Ttf

1:-÷TR4fi 46 R ir cm-) # t 3T2Tal &t -Nc#)1, ) "ef -1c41i*O1 411 A cp

t, 22-TRAt - 2 ct.)) 31-rcri t I ITR.q L16

311 T t 31-1wrtmil, fcl v c i T4Aq 1, 371# 310)-4 WrzfR #t •6cqPt61 611 1 T

tf*3-cm fir (,)A 14 111 cp,mt cI x-RoNiciict) *1,4 There are occasions when a Reporting Officer cannot in fairness to himself and to the Government servant reported upon, either certify integrity or make an adverse entry or even be in possession of any information which would enable him to make a secret report to the Head of the Department. Such instances can occur when a Government servant is serving in a remote station and the Reporting Officer has not had occasion to watch his work closely or when a Government servant has worked under the Reporting Officer only for brief period or has been on long leave etc. In all such cases, the Reporting Officer should make an entry in the integrity column to the effect that he has not watched the Government servant's work for sufficient time to be able to make any definite remark or that he has heard nothing against to the Government servant's integrity, as the case may be . This would be a factual statement to which there can be no objection. But it is necessary that a superior officer should make every effort to form a definite judgement about the integrity of those working under him, as early as possible, so that he may be able to make a positive statement.

(TfifIt ffil-TFT ft-4. 20 4-1, 1972 chl chlOTTO TiO 51/ 5 / (Department of Personnel O.M. No 51/5/72-Estt. 'A' dated 20'1' May, 1972.)

v) ftcit8 fo-G#41c1 31-14wrft TFA-4 f4m—ot c.t) fT ,INni --

The remarks against the integrity column shall be made by the reporting officer in one the three options mentioned below:-

i) .ict)t t zi- / Beyond doubt ii) t, -It ,1c1,.-1 t I Alt 3TRrwritr 461 th-Lif*ol titTzT 33.ff: tbk-c1

Since the integrity of the officer is doubtful, a secret note is attached. F - -1.-k -10 Tdt t

iii) -ci fi,14 e).) -. f' 31fr--i-tr 4)1 TH TrzniTr •-ii-io t 1:1---g 3TRI-Wit 43.3 # cIN qict&ri ftlz1-)-8 -Igi t 4 I I

Not watched the officer's work for sufficient time to form a definite judgement but nothing adverse has been reported to me about the officer

:: 12 ::

Ifff 3ti4Wfci fr3Tc -z-Trwr itzrr w-qr wrgR •

If the officer's integrity is beyond doubt, it may be so stated.

(vii) coli ErT wraii Rzu 3T 1 -14'oftgo• m-r-tor c6)

If there is any doubt or suspicion, the column should be left blank and action taken as under:

3roft ittcrtf •31 uTi 1:R 39 qt f4r4 1 . •rgi r ito:raft

Rtfre 3p-rair 3rf r~1 trre w i S w-d 1Tjf4ftqff 37V61

Wit4r4 31-m-d-rgr -er fir ;Frrfzrru r 3ig-ar Tn-crtzr feEcraft TM-4 ftcit8

qr 3TRrwrtr m)- err zrr -zfr4 zrarReitt- f41zWETM ~1 MT (17 ftWzrff

31-att cl cI7 ffet tUIT 2.17 f" qg fe f 4-4-d :1444 -TWaT ;t-4fru ct))

gl firA I (a) A separate secret note should be recorded and followed up. A copy of the note should also be sent

together with the Confidential Report to the next superior ocer who will nsure that the follow up

action is taken expeditiously. Where it is not possible either fi

to certify the i entegrity or to record the

secret note, the Reporting officer should state either that he has not watched the o ffi

the officer, as the cas

cer's work foe r

sufficient time to form a definite judgment or that he has heard nothing against

may be.

(() 0-1R 31T401 Wrt4r4 TTRITUFTEMcf -VF" zif Titg TN 3TRICt Thf f4tur -9-=Ifffm -Wzrt

-rItq 3117 u-4-TgR Titcrtgf t 3rrafz wrfeq

(b) If as a result of the follow-up action the doubts or suspicions are cleared the officer's integrity should be certified and an entry made accordingly in the Confidential Report.

(Tr) ziR zrr Trag trq Trtr -g)- qici Itt War -0-et Tv-qv RI-4rq--d

31-Itwrt m)• rt wrfeq

(C)

If the doubts or suspicions are confirmed, this fact should also be recorded and duly communicated to

the officer concerned.

(7-) ziR 3r -j-461 wrt-41-4 trfturFwm-tr Ylch zrr RI-kg -gg 3ft- 9- et izr-4 Ty 3tfi TriTzr

Rt4RM 31-ftThrtf 3ITWPT 1:R ffiTRT- t TEit Wit-q (`r) 3t17

(it)

mct 7T-41 -WW

(d) If as a result of the follow-up action the doubts or suspand thereafter icions are nei ather

ction taken as cleared not indicated at (b) confirmed the

officer's conduct should be watched for a further period and (c) above. * **