Five Mill Tree Method 1208

24
The Five Mill Tree Method Search Marketing Lost its Tail Five Mill Marketing San Francisco, California

description

 

Transcript of Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Page 1: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

The Five Mill Tree MethodSearch Marketing Lost its Tail

Five Mill MarketingSan Francisco, California

Page 2: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

History - The Beginning

• CPM Advertising– Buy advertising space on the web– Pay per thousand impressions– Advertised with banners

Page 3: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

History – Search Marketing

• PPC Advertising– Invented by GoTo/Overture in 1998– Paid per click on Search Engine ads– Keywords were discreet

• Bidding on any of a list of “keywords”• Search Engines would map the individual “keywords”

to a list of search queries

Page 4: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

History – Keyword Mapping

“Keyword”:california socks

Note: These are just examples and keywords may not have mapped exactly as depicted.

Search Queries:

“California wool socks”

“California blue socks”

“California SOX compliance”

Page 5: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

History - Keyword Landscape (‘98-’02)

Search: socks

Result:Keyword Searches

socks 5,000

red socks 400

wool socks 300

pink socks 250

toe socks 200

socks compliance 190

sock fetish 180

Head

Tail

multiple definitions

unrelated

unrelated

Overture Inventory Tool

Page 6: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

History - Building Ad Campaigns• Step 1: Build Adgroup(s) for “Head” word(s)

– 1a. Test ads– 2a. Pick best performing ad– 3a. Bid keyword– 4a. Re-bid if/when performance changes

• Step 2: Build Out “The Long Tail”– Keyword Tools– Spreadsheets– Web Logs

Page 7: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Google Changes the Game (1/2)

• Google– Launches Adwords in 2000

• CPM Model– Model was unbalanced– Inefficient & ineffective for Google and advertisers

– Google re-launched Adwords in 2002• CPC Model

– CTR– Bid Price

Page 8: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Google Changes the Game (2/2)

• The Important Features:– Match type– Geo-targeting– Dayparting

Page 9: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

“New” Keyword Landscape (1/2)

Keyword Searches

socks 5,000

red socks 400

wool socks 300

pink socks 250

toe socks 200

socks compliance 190

sock fetish 180

Then

socks

Now

All words related to “socks”

Head

Tail

Page 10: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

“New” Keyword Landscape (2/2)

[red socks]

Legend

Match Type Example

Broad socks

Phrase “wool socks”

Exact [socks]

Geo-Targeting GT: CA

[socks]

GT: CA

socks

“wool socks”

Page 11: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Bidding Methodology Revisited

• Step 1: Build Adgroup for “Head” word(s)– 1a. Test ads– 2a. Pick best performing ad– 3a. Bid keyword– 4a. Re-bid if/when performance changes

• Step 2: Build Out “The Long Tail”– Keyword Tools– Spreadsheets– Web Logs

KW5

KW1

KW2

KW 4

KW6KW7

KW3

Then Now: “Five Mill Tree Method”

Page 12: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

“Five Mill Tree Method”

socks $2.50 CPC

[socks] socks (- [socks])$3.00 CPC $2.20 CPC

GT: California[socks](-GT: CA)

$2.00 CPC

$3.25 CPC

GT: Los Angeles, CA GT: California (- Los Angeles,CA)

$2.50 CPC $1.90 CPC

Page 13: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Barriers of Entry – Geo-targeting (1/2)

ps. My apologies to Hawaii and Alaska residence, whom I chose not to include in this example. I promise it was for no other reason than fitting the map on the page. I love you both.

CPC: $2.50

YOU

CPC: $3.50

Competitor

“But, why optimize!? I am already #1 everywhere!!!”

1. In aggregate, competitor does not lose too much money.2. Competitor can determine where ads work and where they don’t.

Avg. Position: 1

Avg. Position: 1

2

Keyword: [socks]

Page 14: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Barriers of Entry – Geo-targeting (2/2)

YOUCPC: $5.00CPC: $1.00

Avg. Position: 1

CompetitorCPC: $3.50

Avg. Position: 1.5

1. Competitor gets good ad position.2. Competitor gets relatively bad traffic.3. Competitor does not analyze traffic too closely and finds Search

Marketing unsuccessful.

1.5

YOU

Competitor

Keyword: [socks]

Page 15: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Barriers of Entry – Optimized

CPC: $6.00CPC: $5.00CPC: $1.50CPC: $1.00CPC: $ .50CPC: $ .20CPC: $ .10

pos.: 1pos.: 1pos.: 1pos.: 1pos.: 2pos.: 4pos.: 10

1. As you “slice and dice”…a. Competitor CPA will increase and/or conversions decrease.b. Your CPA will decrease and/or conversions will increase.

2. Optimization will protect your margins from competitors who start to bid more aggressively.

Page 16: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Added Benefits of Optimization

• Targeted adgroups -> Targeted ads• History with optimized ads -> high quality

scores & low CPCs• Increased granularity and profitability

Page 17: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Rules about “Five Mill Tree Method”

Reminder:“Five Mill Tree Method” is not just match type manipulation/optimization.

It can be done with Geo-targeting, Dayparting, Ad competition and more!

Optimization with the “Five Mill Tree Method” will nearly always lead to…

1. Increased conversions at the same overall CPA.2. Decreased CPAs.3. Increased Barriers of Entry.

Page 18: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Dan SohaPrincipal & SEM Specialistdan [at] fivemill [dot] comSan Francisco, California

Who are we?: We are a team of Search Marketing experts that utilize math and computer science with a hands-on approach to solve complex Search Marketing problems with customized Search Marketing solutions.

Page 19: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

AppendixTechniques/Tricks to Slice and Dice

Page 20: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Techniques/Tricks to Slice and Dice

• Match Type “Trumping”• Geo-Target “Trumping”• Ad Competition

Page 21: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Match Type “Trumping”

socksMatch Type: BroadCPC: $3.00

• 2 Identical Ads• 2 Different Match Types• 2 Different Bids

[socks]Match Type: ExactCPC: $1.00

User Query: [socks]

This query is mapped to this keyword because Google sees that the query is a closer match to the keyword and match type despite the lower bid.

Page 22: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Geo-Target “Trumping”

[socks]Match Type: ExactGeo-Target: USACPC: $3.00

• 2 Identical Ads• 2 Identical Match Types• 2 Different Geo-targets• 2 Different Bids

[socks]Match Type: ExactGeo-Target: New YorkCPC: $1.00

User Query: [socks]User Location: Brooklyn, New York

This query is mapped to this keyword because Google sees that the geo-target is a closer match, despite the lower bid.

Page 23: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Ad Competition (1/2)

Situation: I have 1 adgroup with 10 keywords and 2 ads.

Problem: I think the first ad is performing better for some keywords and the second ad is performing better for the rest. How do I optimize without analyzing my web logs?

Page 24: Five Mill Tree Method 1208

Ad Competition (2/2)

Resolution: Let Google do the work for you!

Step #2: Duplicate adgroup and run 1 ad in each

1 Adgroup10 Keywords2 Ads

1 Adgroup10 KeywordsAd #1

1 Adgroup10 KeywordsAd #2

Step #1: Make sure bids are targeting current metrics of success

Step #3: Let ads run until they have ample conversion history

Step #4: Re-bid to current metrics of success

Wrap your head around it: Due to Google’s CTR model designed to make them the most money possible and your re-bidding designed to hit your metrics, you will maximize conversions and the best keyword-ad combination will naturally occur.

Step #5: Wait and repeat Step #4