fishbeck, thompson, carr & huber · 2016. 6. 11. · FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC, 6090...
Transcript of fishbeck, thompson, carr & huber · 2016. 6. 11. · FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC, 6090...
fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberengineers e scientists • architects
FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT
FOR
ELECTRO-VOICE, INC.Buchanan, Michigan
FINAL REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT
FOR
ELECTRO-VOICE, INC.Buchanan, Michigan
December 1996Project No. F93307Q
Prepared by:
FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC,6090 East Fulton, P.O. Box 211
Ada, Michigan 49301-0211(616) 676-2666
7402 Westshire Drive, Suite 110Lansing, Michigan 48917-9764
(517) 627-
CERTIFICATION
The Lagoon Soils Remediation was performed under the Operable Unit Consent Decree and Statement of
Work for the Remedial Design and Remedial Action for the First Operable Unit that was filed with the U.S.
District Court on September 20, 1993. This Remedial Action Report addresses Phase 1 of the first operable
unit, the capping of the former lagoon area soils.
The work was conducted in accordance with the following documents dated June 1995 and revised September
1995:
• Basis of Design Report
• Construction Quality Assurance Plan
• Operation and Maintenance Manual
• Design Drawings
• Project Manual
On behalf of Mark IV Audio, Inc. and in accordance with the Consent Decree, this report complies with the
following statement:
"To the best of my knowledge, after through investigation, I certify that the information contained in or
accompanying this submission is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties
for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signed:
<fr+ui* /\- gtsaJames A. Susan, P.E. Date
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................. 2
3.0 PRELIMINARY WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.1 Clearing and Grubbing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.2 Fence Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.3 Drum Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33.4 Monitoring Well and Lysimeter Abandonment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43.5 Temporary Fencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.0 CONTAMINATED SOIL EXCAVATION AND PLACEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54.2 Surveying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64.3 Compacted Soil Density Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64.4 Modifications to the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.4.1 Excavation Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.4.2 Excavation Bottom Contours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74.4.3 Final Cap Subgrade Contours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.0 EXCAVATION BACKFILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.2 Soil Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85.3 Re-excavation of Backfilled Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.0 CAP CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.2 Clay Cap Material Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.2.1 Laboratory Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96.3 Field Density Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106.4 Surveying and Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7.0 DRAINAGE LAYER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137.2 Soil Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137.3 Surveying . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
8.0 TOPSOIL AND SEEDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9.0 FINAL SITE WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159.1 Access Road Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159.2 Fencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159.3 Drainage Swales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
10.0 DECONTAMINATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
11.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1711.1 Organizations and Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1711.2 Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1711.3 Submittals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
12.0 PREFINAL AND FINAL INSPECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Listof Tables
Table 1 • Clay Cap Material Field Density Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
List of Appendices
Appendix 1 * Daily Construction Progress ReportsAppendix 2 • Construction Record DrawingsAppendix 3 • Septage Analytical ResultsAppendix 4 • Geotechnical Laboratory ResultsAppendix 5 • Field Density Testing ResultsAppendix 6 * Excavation Limits LetterAppendix 7 • Survey DataAppendix 8 * Meeting MinutesAppendix 9 * Preflnal and Final Inspection Reports
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes the work that was completed for the Lagoon Soils Remediation at the Electro-Voice (EV)
Superfund Site in Buchanan, Michigan. The work was performed in accordance with the requirements
identified in the Record of Decision and the Statement of Work included in the Consent Decree dated
December 21, 1993. The work performed at the site included the following:
* Excavation of contaminated soil related to the former lagoons.
* Placement of excavated soils in the area to be capped.* Construction of a cap meeting the requirements of Michigan Act 64.
* Fencing of the capped area.
* Miscellaneous site work.
The work was conducted during the period May 28, 1996, through August 23, 1996. The remediation
contractor was Michigan Earthworks, Inc., of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr &
Huber, Inc. (FTC&H) provided inspection and construction phase engineering services. A record of the daily
work effort is documented in the daily construction progress reports. These reports are presented in
Appendix 1.
12/26/96 - 1 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS
2.0 BACKGROUND
In February 1983, the EV site was placed on the Michigan and the National Priority Lists. AnAdministrative Order by Consent (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [ EPA] Docket No. V-W-87-C-023) to conduct a Remedial Investigation (RI) and Feasibility Study (FS) was entered into by EV and theEPA on October 8, 1987. The results of the RI were presented in a report titled, Final RemedialInvestigation Report for Electro-Voice, Inc., dated August 1990, prepared by FTC&H. The results of theFS were presented in a report titled, Feasibility Study Report, Electro-Voice, Inc. Site, dated September 10,1991, and prepared by CH2M Hill.
A Record of Decision for the First Operable Unit (onsite remediation) was signed by the EPA RegionalAdministrator on June 23, 1992. The Operable Unit Consent Decree and Statement of Work for theRemedial Design and Remedial Action for the First Operable Unit at the EV facility was filed with the U.S.District Court on September 20, 1993. The Consent Decree/Statement of Work (SOW) divided theRemedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA) work into two phases: Phase I addresses the former lagoonarea soils, lower aquifer investigation, and off-property groundwater monitoring; Phase II addresses the drywell area soils and onsite groundwater. On October 4, 1993, EV received authorization from the U.S. EPAto proceed with the Phase I RD/RA work as set forth in the Consent Decree/SOW.
The additional studies and the lower aquifer investigation area were completed in May 1995 and theremedial design was initiated. The additional studies results were presented in the Phase I Remedial DesignAdditional Studies Report for Electro-Voice, Inc., dated April 1995 and revised May 1995. The remedial
design elements are described in the following reports and documents:
• Basis of Design Report• Construction Quality Assurance Plan
• Operation and Maintenance Manual
• Design Drawings
• Project Manual
These documents are dated June 1995 and were revised September 1995.
The remedial design for the project was approved by EPA on November 8, 1995. Bidding and contractorselection were completed in May 1996. Remedial action work began at the site on May 28, 1996.
12/26/96 - 2 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFT.JAS
3.0 PRELIMINARY WORK
Preliminary work at the site included tasks necessary to prepare the site for construction vehicle access,excavation activities, and cap construction activities.
3.1 Clearing and Grubbing
The excavation and cap area were cleared of trees beginning in April 1996. The trees were cut to a pointapproximately two to three feet above the ground surface. The tree trunks and limbs were removed fromthe site. This work was accomplished under a separate contract before RA construction began.
Any trees and shrubs remaining at the start of the RA construction were cut and placed in the cap area bythe contractor. The wood was then broken into small pieces by running a bulldozer repeatedly over thematerial. The stumps remaining from the tree removal were ground in-place using a stump grinder. Allbranches and chips resulting from clearing and grinding were excavated with the contaminated soil andplaced under the cap.
3.2 Fence Removal
The existing fence was removed prior to beginning the excavation. The fence posts were removed and takenfrom the site. The fence fabric was rolled up and stored on the site. Undamaged fabric and posts werereused as part of the new fence construction. The remaining posts and fabric were disposed offsite.
3.3 Drum Removal
Approximately 30 drums were located on the northern portion of the site. These drums contained cuttingsfrom the lower aquifer investigation conducted as part of the additional studies. The boring for the loweraquifer investigation was located near MW-9S and MW-9D. The drums were emptied and the contents ofthe drums were placed in the cap area, along with the emptied drums. Once placed, the drums were crushed
using a bulldozer.
12/26/96 -3 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2Ri;PTJAS
3.4 Monitoring Well and Lysimeter Abandonment
Six monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW^, MW-10, and MW-16) and four lysimeters (Sl-1, SL-2, NL-1, and NL-2) that were located in the limit of the cap or the excavation limit were cut at grade andgrouted in-place. The grout used was a lean cement and bentonite slurry which was pumped down thecasing of the well or lysimeter.
Monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, and MW-16 were replaced after all capping activities were completed.The lysimeters and other abandoned monitoring wells were not replaced. The data from the lysimeters wereno longer needed, and it was no longer necessary to sample the other monitoring wells.
3.5 Temporary Fencing
Prior to beginning excavation activities, temporary fencing was placed at the perimeter of the site to restrictaccess.
12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFr.JAS
4.0 CONTAMINATED SOIL EXCAVATION AND PLACEMENT
Contaminated soil located outside the area of the planned cap was excavated and transported to the cap area.The excavated soils formed the subgrade of the cap. The excavation limits were established during theadditional studies phase of the project and verified during construction by survey, and measurement byonsite personnel. Figure l(Appendix 2) shows the design excavation limits. Excavation of soils began onJune 4, 1996, and was completed on July 27, 1996. Soil excavation took longer than anticipated due tofrequent rain which inhibited vehicle movement at the site.
4.1 Description
The impacted soil was excavated using a two-cubic yard (cy) excavator and moved to the planned cap areausing two six-wheel off-road haul trucks. The soils where then spread in one-foot lifts with a CaterpillarD6 bulldozer.
Soil excavation began in the low area in the northwest area of the site. In this area, soil was to be removedto a point 2 to 3 feet above the groundwater table. At the time of the excavation, the groundwater tab1: wasfound to be approximately 2.5 feet higher than assumed during design. The excavation in this area wasterminated at a point approximately 1 foot above the water table, approximately at elevation 685.6. Thesoils in this low area were generally clean to silly sands, as indicated by previous soil borings. However,the top 1 to 2 feet of soils over the area was organic muck that were difficult to handle, particularly whenwet due to the frequent rains. These soils were mixed with drier, deeper sands before placing them withinthe limits of the cap. A total of 24,500 cy of soil was removed from the area of excavation and placed inthe area of the planned cap.
An old septic tank was encountered on the west slope of the northwest excavation area, at approximatecoordinate locations EO+66, N5+00 (Figure 1, Appendix 2). The tank encountered appeared to be atypical residential septic tank that was full of thickened septage. The tank and material were removed andplaced under the cap area. A sample of the thickened septage was collected and analyzed. The analyticalresults are presented in Appendix 3.
12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.. I AS
4.2 Surveying
A 44-foot grid was established over the area of excavation prior to beginning the RA work. This was thesame grid that was used during the additional studies phase of the project to preverify limits of contaminatedsoil. At each grid node, stakes were placed and the required excavation cut was identified. Additionalstaking was performed at various times as the excavation proceeded to ensure that the required limits were
met.
After a final review of the surveyed bottom contours, an area was identified that had not been sufficientlyexcavated. This area was located in the central excavation area between grid nodes 12, 13, and 14 to thenorth and 27, 28, and 29 to the south. A layer averaging approximately three feet thick needed to beremoved from this area. Approximately 2,000 cy of soil was excavated from this area and placed in the areato be capped. The additional excavation was verified by measurements made by onsite personnel.
The final excavation contours are shown on Figure 2 (Appendix 2). This additional area of excavation isidentified on Figure 2 (Appendix 2).
4.3 Compacted Soil Density Measurements
Two samples of the excavated soils were submitted to the geotechnical laboratory for modified proctortesting. The results of the tests are included in Appendix 4. The maximum dry density and optimummoisture content for the samples were 125 pounds per cubic foot (Ibs/cf) and 10%, and 124.5 Ibs/cf and
10.5%, respectively. The Construction Quality Assurance(CQA) Plan required that two samples of thesubgrade be tested in the laboratory.
In-place field density testing was conducted on the placed cap subgrade soils at a frequency of 1 test per5,000 cy. In-place density testing was performed using a Troxler nuclear density gage. The subgrade soil
density tests are included in Appendix 5. The field density tests averaged 90.8% of maximum, with anaverage moisture of 10.6%, based on test locations. A total of 17 in-place density tests of the cap subgradesoils was performed during placement. Eight of the tests were used to document that compaction wasachieved. The CQA Plan required that 4 tests be conducted.
12/26/96 - 6 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS
4.4 Modifications to the Plan
The final excavation limits were modified, reducing the total quantity of soil that was excavated. Therevised limits of excavation did not affect contaminated soil areas.
4.4.1 Excavation Limits
During initial excavation activities, the limits of excavation in the northwest area of the site were adjustedfrom those shown on the design drawings. The limits shown on the design drawings extended beyond thelimits of contamination based on the additional studies work. As a result, the western and northern limitsof excavation in the northwest area of the site were reduced to reflect the analytical data collected as a partof the additional studies. A letter to the EPA discussing the situation is presented in Appendix 6. Therevised design excavation limits are indicated on Figure 1 (Appendix 2).
4.4.2 Excavation Bottom Contours
The bottom elevations of the excavation were adjusted, as discussed previously, to reflect the elevation ofthe water table at the time of the excavation. The final excavation bottom contours are indicated onFigure 2 (Appendix 2).
4.4.3 Final Cap Subgrade Contours
The final cap subgrade contours were adjusted from the original plan to reflect the smaller quantity ofexcavated soil resulting from the adjustment of the limits of excavation and the higher groundwaterelevation. The final cap subgrade contours are indicated on Figure 3 (Appendix 2).
12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS
5.0 EXCAVATION BACKFILL
The excavated areas of the site were backfilled with clean soil from offsite borrow pits.
5.1 Description
The excavated soil areas were backfilled with clean material and graded to the contours indicated onFigure 5, (Appendix 2) Final Contours Record Drawing. In areas where infiltration would occur, MichiganDepartment of Transportation (MOOT) Class II sand was used. A clayey sand was used in areas whereinfiltration was not a consideration. Specifically, MDOT Class II sand was used in the lower areas wherestorm water will collect and infiltrate in the northwest area of the site.
5.2 Soil Characteristics
Backfill soils were obtained from a local borrow pit (Yerington pit). Soils were classified as MDOT ClassII granular material in accordance with MDOT specifications. Material used for backfill in low areas wasobtained from the same source as the drainage layer material.
5.3 Re-excavation of Backfilled Soils
Construction of the c!ay cap necessarily proceeded concurrently with the backfilling of the excavated soils.Because of the unusually heavy rainfall during construction, some erosion of the first lifts of clay led to
silting in the northwest area of the site, after the area had been backfilled. The silting resulted in excessiveponding of runoff in this area of the site. After the clay was covered with the sand drainage layer, theponded water in the low area was pumped down as much as possible such that excavation equipment couldaccess the area. The top two feet of material in the ponded area was then removed and placed outside thelimits of the cap as general fill material. The area was then backfilled with a coarse sand. The grade in thelow area was also increased by approximately five feet from the original plan.
12/26/96J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.MS
6.0 CAP CONSTRUCTION
Cap construction included all activities related to the placement, compaction, and testing of the claymaterial. The clay cap material placement began on July 8, 1996 and was completed on August 9, 1996.A minimum of three feet of clay material was placed over the area to be capped. Approximately 10,000cy of clay material were placed at the site.
6.1 Description
Placement of the clay cap material began in the southern and western portions of the excavated soil capsubgrade and proceeded to the north and east. Clay cap material was transported to the site from a nearbyborrow source (Pelley pit), placed at the appropriate location on the subgrade, and spread in nine-inch liftsusing a Caterpillar D6 bulldozer. Clay cap material compaction was achieved using a sheepsfoot rollerpulled behind the bulldozer. A padfoot roller was initially used, but later substituted by the sheepsfootroller which required less passes of the equipment to achieve proper compaction. Four lifts of clay materialwere placed. Each day's lift of the clay material was tested for density with the Troxler nuclear densitygage.
6.2 Clay Cap Material Testing
Testing of the clay cap material included laboratory testing of the borrow pit material and the placedmaterial, and in-place field density testing using the Troxler.
6.2.1 Laboratory Testing
Borrow Pit Testing
Initially, the source of clay material for the cap was to be the Yerrington Brothers borrow pit located northof the City of Buchanan. This clay material was tested under the United States Soil Classification Systemas a CL clay material with a permeability of less than 1 x 10"7 centimeters per second (cm/sec). However,
it was determined that the volume of clay material was not sufficient for the project needs. A secondborrow source, the Pelley pit, located on Range Line Road, was tested and found to be an excellent qualityclay material with more than adequate volume. The Pelley pit was used as the source of clay cap materialfor the entire project. In accordance with the CQA Plan, this borrow source was tested twice during the
12/26/96 -9-.1: \DGC93\R93 307Q\RA 2REPT. MS
placement of the clay cap material. Testing results indicated that the material was classified as a CL clay,and exhibited permeabilities of 5.6 x 10'8 cm/sec and 2.7 x 10"8 cm/sec. The borrow pit testing results areincluded in Appendix 4.
In-place Testing
A Shelby Tube for permeability testing was collected of the in-place, compacted clay material. Thepermeability of the compacted clay in-place was 3.4 x 10"8 cm/sec. This particular sample indicated that thesoil classification was an SC clay. This classification was likely the result of some subgrade material beingincorporated into the bottom of the sample since the borrow pit material tested as a CL and there was nonoticeable difference in the loads of clay brought to the site and the samples tested from the borrow pit.The in-place clay material testing result is are included in Appendix 4. The CQA Plan required that onein-place permeability test be performed.
6.3 Field Density Testing
In-place field density measurements of the clay cap material were made daily by onsite personnel. The fielddensity test data are included in Appendix 5. If the in-place clay cap material density was not at least 90 %of the maximum dry density, the lift was compacted further until the required compaction was achieved.After each test was completed, the hole was filled with bentonite chips.
Results for all of the density tests performed are included in Appendix 5, including those that did notinitially pass. Passing tests were typically determined at depths of 6 to 10 inches. Because the action ofthe sheepsfoot roller would create voids in the top of the lift, the top 4 to 6 inches of the l i f t generally didnot achieve the required density. A passing test was therefore determined as greater than 90% of themaximum dry density at a depth of 6 inches or greater. The top 4 to 6 inches of a lift was tested after thenext lift was placed and compacted. The total number of final acceptable density tests taken was 27. Thisresults in a frequency of density tests of approximately 1 test per 270 cy of clay cap material placed, orapproximately 6 tests per lift of clay cap material. This also results in an excess of 1 test per day. The CQAPlan required that 1 test be conducted daily. The final density results are presented in Table 1.
12/26/96 - 10 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFr.JAS
TABLE 1Clay Cap Material
Field Density Testing
Lift
First Lift
Second Lift
Third Lift
Fourth Lift
%ofMaximum
Density(Average)
91.8
91.5
92.8
93.5
%ofMaximum
Density(Individual
Tests)
93.889.291.592.8
90.492.590.892.191.491.8
91.891.191.495.196.292.891.5
91.195.495.095.391.495.692.791.194.193.1
6.4 Surveying and Measurements
A base survey was performed over the extent of the planned cap area after the cap subgrade placement wascompleted. However, it was found that the contractor did not reach appropriate grades along the westernlimit of cap. New grade stakes were set in this area, additional clay material was brought in and placed in
the area, and the area was surveyed again. From both of these surveys, a final subgrade surface drawingwas completed. This drawing is presented on Figure 3 (Appendix 2). A summary of the survey data is
12/26/96: \DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REFr.J AS
11
included in Appendix 7. The final clay survey performed on August 12, 1996, indicated minor cut and fillto attain planned clay grades. The onsite inspector witnessed that the contractor placed clay to the propergrade over the areas indicated as needing additional clay.
Along the southern edge of the cap, the depth of the clay cap material that was placed was uncertain becausethe subgrade had been regraded after the subgrade survey was performed. To confirm the depth of the claycap material in this area, a hand auger was used to bore through the clay cap material to measure its depth.The auger holes were filled with bentonite chips to seal the hole. The measurements showed that the claycap material depth was short by approximately 0.25 feet or less. An additional six inches of clay capmaterial was placed at this location and compacted. Figure 4 (Appendix 2) shows the final clay surface.
12/26/96 - 1 2 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS
7.0 DRAINAGE LAYER
Permeable sand material was placed over the clay cap material to a depth of two feet to protect the claymaterial and aid in drainage. Approximately 7,650 cy of sand was used to construct the drainage layer.
7.1 Description
The MOOT Class n soils for the drainage layer were obtained from the Yerrington pit. The sand materialwas transported to the site, placed at the perimeter of the cap, and spread in 12-inch lifts using a CaterpillarD6 bulldozer.
7.2 Soil Testing
In accordance with the CQA Plan, two samples of the soil used to construct the drainage layer were testedfor permeability and grain size. All of the drainage layer soils met the MOOT specifications for a Class IImaterial. Permeability tests were also performed on the two samples. The tests indicated that the materialhad a permeability of 3 x 10"2 cm/sec and 2.5 x 10"2 cm/sec.
7.3 Surveying
The contractor set grade stakes over the finished clay surface to ensure that 24 inches of sand were placedover the clay material. A survey was performed on August 20, 1996, and grade stakes set indicating finalgrades 28 inches higher than planned clay grades. The contractor adjusted the final sand grade and placedthe final topsoil layer from these stakes.
12/26/96 - 13 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS
8.0 TOPSOIL AND SEEDING
Topsoil was spread over the drainage layer in one uniform lift by a bulldozer, then seeded and fertilized.Areas that had been traveled on more heavily by the topsoil haul trucks were broken up by the bulldozerso that the topsoil was in a loose state prior to seeding and fertilizing. A minimum of four inches of topsoilwas spread over the entire site. The entire site was then hydro-seeded with an MOOT roadside mixture ofseed and fertilizer. By the end of October 1996, grass was established over the entire site.
12/26/96 - 14 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPr.JAS
9.0 FINAL SITE WORK
The final site work included the construction of an access road, drainage structures, and fencing. The finalsite contours and features are shown on Figure 5 (Appendix 2).
9.1 Access Road Construction
The perimeter access road was constructed concurrently with the backfilling of the re-excavated low areain the northwest area of the site. MOOT Class II granular material and general fill material were used toconstruct the perimeter access road. Two 12-inch diameter culvert pipes were placed under the access roadto convey drainage from the cap to the infiltration area in the northwest area of the site. The final roadgrades are indicated on Figure 5 (Appendix 2).
9.2 Fencing
Fencing was installed at the location indicated on Figure 5 (Appendix 2), The gate was moved to the northto provide easier access.
9.3 Drainage Swales
Drainage ditches were constructed along the access road to convey drainage to the northwest area of the site.In addition, two drainage swales were constructed to convey runoff from offsite areas in the northwest
corner of the site and from the two culvert pipes under the access road (Figure 5, Appendix 2) The swaleswere lined with rip-rap placed on nonwoven geotextile fabric.
12/26/96 - 15 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPT.JAS
10.0 DECONTAMINATION
The six-wheel articulated haul trucks used to transport contaminated soil were decontaminated uponcompletion of soil excavation. The equipment was located within the limits of the capped area and thensteam cleaned. The bulldozer was decontaminated after the cap subgrade was placed and graded.Decontamination of the clay cap material hauling trucks was not necessary due to the method the contractoremployed to bring clay cap material onto the site. The clay cap material was initially dumped at the edgeof the cap subgrade and the first lift pushed out over the cap area. After the first lift was placed andcompacted, the incoming trucks would travel over the placed clay cap material, never contacting thecontaminated soils.
12/26/96 - 16 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2RliFr.JAS
11.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION
1 This section identifies the organizations that were involved with the RA for the Lagoon Area Soils.
11.1 Organizations and Personnel
; The following organizations and individuals were involved with the Lagoon Soils Remediation project.
i1 EPA Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E.
Remedial Project Manager
! _ CH2M Hill Mr. Jason KrausEPA Oversight Contractor
1 Ms. Erin PottsEPA Oversight Contractor
j Mark IV Audio, Inc. Mr. Ron GrahamOwner Representative
! Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. Mr. James Susan, P.E./ Project Coordinator
1 Mr. Blake MeinertOnsite Inspector
, Mr. David Conklin, P.E._ Project Engineer
Michigan Earthworks, Inc. Mr. Kim VeilingContractor Project Manager
Mr. Jim Buer1 Contractor Superintendent
11.2 Meetings
A preconstruction meeting was held on May 22, 1996. The agenda for the meeting is included in Appendix} 8. Progress meetings were held on June 6, 1996, June 27, 1996, and July 18, 1996. Progress meeting
minutes are included in Appendix 8.
12/26/96 - 17-J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2RnPT.JAS
11.3 Submittals
The contractor submitted shop drawings for all required items identified in the Project Manual. Shopdrawings or product information were submitted for the corrugated metal pipe, soil erosion controlmaterials, and seed and fertilizer mixtures.
12/26/96 - 1 8 -J:\DOC93\R93307Q\RA2REPTJAS
12.0 PREFINAL AND FINAL INSPECTIONS
The Prefinal Inspection was conducted on August 29, 1996. The Final Inspection was conducted onSeptember 24, 1996. The Prefinal and Final Inspection Reports are included in Appendix 9.
At the time of the Prefinal Inspection, the fence installation was not completed and monitoring wells MW-2,MW-3, and MW-16 had not been reinstalled. The fencing was completed before the Final Inspection wasconducted. The monitoring wells were installed during the week of October 28, 1996.
During the Final Inspection, it was noted that grade stakes needed to be removed from the cap area and"Keep Out" signs needed to be posted on the fence. These items were completed by October 15, 1996,
12/26/96 - 1 9 -J: \DOC93 \R93 307Q\RA 2REKT. JA S
APPENDIX IDAILY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS
Construction Progress ReportLJ Resident Project Representative (daily)t£j Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
V J
Report of job progress and activities. For m-house use only.
Project Name t- ^' /^.\\<*\* J. \U v^ A^al r\«_U •Contractor f\ ^ \\\ t o. -c \ W \^<^ v: -.
WeatherTemperatureTime onsite 122O
Project No.DateObserver
Routing:Project Mgr MsProject Eng 0File
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors Carpenters Laborers Other Total
51Subcontractors
SW^-e ^\oV^ ; w\ V> u x v
TQ<U\ tvCvVAK^^tvx V)'O-*;.Vtev^^
AV\c-xx At-C-A^Uv/
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
\
, ^-- v^ ex ^^u^i V <v. S \ Vl
<r v.:^ O
^ C\ •-. P u l l e dC -G
X \ C v C <- A v ' \ \<% V
{use other side for. additional information)
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
•Tc^-v
VISITORS A
V022
Fishbcck. Thompson. Carr& Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 * Ad». Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666
7402 Wcstshirc Drive * Suite 110 • Unsing. Michigan 4S9I7 • (517)627-1141 10/16/92
Project NameContractor
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTReport of job progress and activities. For in-house use only. -yQ
Project NumberDateObserver
Weather Temperature Time onsite \0 At*.
Labor onsiteContractor/subcontractor Superintcndant Foreman Laborers Other Total
f
Equipment onsiteContractor/subcontractor Equipment Hours Jn use Equipment Hours in use Equipment Hours in use
Work Being Performed:
*,\££%«i«J EVC.,/
-yix**)c
.4> '&* <fg -7^^^^ " '
{continuerl nn hack}
Discussions or Decisions
Major Deliveries
Visitors
W019 4/5/94
j/> So lt^
0
WOI9
Construction Progress Report1 — 1 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeCi Office Staff
( Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.*— .
Project NameContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite •' 3c?
Project No.DateObserver
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
/ -Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
/O
tWORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side fordditionat information)
P(LE"
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbeck. Thompson, Canr & Hubcr. Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*. Michigan 49301 (616) 676-2666
r Construction Progress ReportLdRcsiaent Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project Name E V'
Weather Cmoo *JTemperatureTime onsite 1-
Contractor
Project No.DateObservor
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors; Carpenters Laborers
3
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other
Routing:
Total
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
Subcontractors
OtJ $1 T& /UO -CMttlU, /*Rft
3/
Pfur c/W*STUMPS OF 5u^/*g QAf*
o? 10 70
t Nifec F&QH KA/KJT. /r A{use other side foradditional infonnation}
So
AV. £S iM^
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
fif
VISITORSMOO
AH j)
Fishbcck, Thompson. Carr & Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666
Construction Progress ReportUoResident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
( Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project NameContractor C.H (G
Routing:WeatherTemperature _6Time onsite B
Project No.DateObserver
Supervisors^.
Carpenters LaborersContractor's Labor Force
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other3
Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
/ M
HJfe 6O/L. figHrt/UiM(=i TooFoA- OFT/HAL. DuMP THu &
•u)——•"•o*"'**-i—"*-. •-•» -O Cik
"'\tf\S^.
{use other side foradditional information} M\K!T /S
I A/re&Hm-AioT.
-J V^
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbcck, Thompson. Carr & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 * Ada. Michiean 4930! « (616) 676-2666
Construction Progress ReportLaResident Project Representative (daily)I_I Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Repon of job progress and activides. For in-house use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing:Weather "?TemperatureTime onsite
^ Project No.DateObserver
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
OtherContractor's Labor Force
Total
Subcontractors
VX
WORK BHNGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
——————<>——- -V
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
'*—^ •"
Fishbcck, Thompson, Carr & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 « Ada. Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666
Construction Progress ReportIi3 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeC3 Office Staff
Weather «TemperatureTime onsite
-C-..;
Contractor's Labor Force
Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project NameContractor V-^A. ^-
Routing;Project No.Date
Observer<- • - * -
Supervisors Carpenters LaborersI
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
£4.
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbcck. Thompson. Canr & Hubcr, inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 » Ada. Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666
C.
Construction Progress ReportK) Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
J
Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project Name ^L\ <g <Jvr^. w r-^ < <a____________Contractor
Routing:Weather fTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other TotalContractor's Labor Force
Subcontractors
MJL
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr £ Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666
i i Construction Progress ReportC] Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeC3 Office Staff
WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Contractor's Labor Force
Report of job progtess and activities. For in-house use only.
Project Name ^.Contractor t-\\
Routing:Project No.DateObserver
Supervisors_ I- - .
Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
>«rr <L,
^ ^ ^ - \
i {use other side fori idditionai information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbcck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 (616)676-2666
627-1141 10/16/92
Construction Progress ReportUS Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff
V J
Weather "^^ ^^Temperature £^~Timeonsite ^ -. ,0
( Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project Name & \ Contractor ,^\
Project No. ^ *7A.<e -."-?-Date ^ / , ? / « = , cObservor ^ M^^*-\«_.<Jr
dK^sj< -; ^""e --<JU^^v; ^p^o^C^._-*=^S-'S,
Routing:Project MgrProject EngFile
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers Other TotalContractor's Labor Force
Subcontractors
WORK BONGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS c.
Fishbcck, Thompson. Carr &. Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ads, Michigan 49301 « (616)676-2666
Construction Progress ReportUS Resident Project Representative (duly)I—I Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Weather SwTemperatureTime onsite
Contractor's Labor Force
Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing:Project No. pDate c.Observor
Supervisors/
Carpenters Laborersy
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional information)
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr &. Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, Michigan 49301 (616)676-2666
Construction Progress ReportQ Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project NameContractor JAA ?-A.~£^A^ <^Vs .
Routing:Weather ^TemperatureTime onsite 6:
Project No.DateObservor
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
/Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
--^^ <. — ^w
(use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbeck, Thompson, Can' & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton « P.O. Box 211 * Ad*, Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666
Construction Progress ReportLj Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeCH Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
f / /f /<= C.
Cootractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
ICarpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
- J
te.—17
"SrTmo- I a———* . ^ .
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS-j
Fishbeck. Thompson, Can- & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666
Construction Progress Report0 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For m-house use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Contractor's Labor Force
Project No.DateObserver
*=? ^- c
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFUe
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
=A
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
FJshbcck, Thompson. Carr& Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 « (616)676-2666
Construction Progress Reportfc—t£S Resident Project Representative (daily)
. LJ Project Representative1 D Office Staff
___ __
( Repon of job progress and activities. For m-houso use only.x. ___ _. __________________________________Project NameContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite •»*%. J^*«-
Project No.DateObservor
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject Eng
Other TotalContractor's Labor Force
Subcontractors
X
\ WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
. AX
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
Fishbeck, Thompson. Carr &. Huber, Inc.6090 Ewt FuKoo - P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 * (616) 676-2666
7402 Wertihire Drive * Suite 110 » Lansing, Michigan 4«917 * (517)627-1141 10/16/97
___i_
•/ ciy
Construction Progress ReportJEO Resident Project Representative (daily)ED Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Weather t-^«»^^--s., *-*-Temperature c. js~ Time onsite \ ?;•. o^.
Contractor's Labor Force
f Report of job progress and activities. For m-bousc use only.
Project Name ^L% ? ^ -S?T«>Contractor -^ n_ t^-^Ac
iV^ Project No. *? 2,lko^ ^"~* Date C./T.'-//->C
Observor -$., ' y-^i^^vx^^'C
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers/ _ V
o^^^_ "^olA«rf^^;«^^^ . v ~~-sX~--^<a>s^ v
Routing:Project MgrProject EngFUe
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES
Vc^-^k.
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
Fishbeck. Thompson, Carr &. Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fuhon • P.O. Box 211 • A<1», Michigan 49301 » (616)676-2666
7402 Wcstihire Drive « Suite 110 * Uiuing, Michigvn 4*917 * (517)627-1141 £0/16^2
Construction Progress ReportBu Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For m-house use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Contractor's Labor Force
Project No.Date
Observor
Supervisorsi
Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
* "=
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
V022
Fishbeclc. Thompson, Carr & Hubcr, Inc.6090 Eut Fulton * P.O. Box 211 • Ad«, Michigan 49301 ' (616)676-2666
74O2 Wcstxhire Drive • Suhe 110 • Lansing, Michigan 48917 • (517) 627-1141 10/16/92
Construction Progress Reporth£! Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For in-bouso use only.
Project Name SEL;Contractor t-A_\<. -;
^l-fr**^--
Routing:Weather <TemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
/ __Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject Eng
Other Total
Subcontractors
IA.V
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional information}
•S Z^TOO
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
vozz
Ftshbcck, Thompson. CMT& Huber. Inc.6090 Eut Fuhoo • P.O. Box 211 • Ad», Mtclugtn 49301 * (616) 676-2666
7402 Wiltshire Drive " Suite L10 • Laming, Michigw 48917 * (517) 627-1141 tO/16/97
Construction Progress Reportj-" iE$J Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For in-iiouso use only.
Project NameContractor
-V- «—
R outing;WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
i- Project No. <=jDate <•Observor
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
/Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFUe
Other ToUi
Subcontractors
TV ;
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
j—^""v "a-o- .
(use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
FUhbeck. Thompson, CWT & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fuhon * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, Michigan 49301 *
7402 Wouhirc Drive » Suite 110 * Lanaing. Michigan 4«937 *676-2666
627-1141 IOM6/92
Construction Progress ReportJ3 Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For m-bouse use only.
Project Name SE_Contractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.Date
Observor
Project Mgr
iM.
Contractor's labor ForceSupervisors
/Carpenters Laborers Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
•• Y*-"L-*-"*-'vx
{use other side foradditional information}
fr"**-^——-}——g -*—-—-^.«^^VV^ . <L«ws^=-T- ^
^T
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
Fishbcck, Thompson. CarrA Huber, Inc.6090 East Fulton * P.O. Box 211 » Ad*, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666
74O2 Wcrtihire Drive • Suite 110 • L&iuuig, Michigvi 4«9l7 • (517)627-1141 10/16/91
^J
LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff J
l /~C* -/ - • ————'—- --• -————————'——Report of job progress and activities. For in-bouso use ooJy.
Kesideot Frojecl Represenutive (cUily^ "~~~Project NameContractor -\U- -
WeatherTemperatureTimeomite
Project No. f=~ «=? 31s3:JR.Routing;
DateObservor
?- / / /<; c:
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisor*
/Carpenters Laborers
._r__
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other TotaJ
Subcontractors
WORK BEING^•RFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES ^i t ^*r^jr~*.
(use other side foradditional information}
USCUSSIONS orPHdSIONS
ilTORS
Fiihbcdc, Thomptott. Cur & Mubcr. loc.6090 Eut Fukoo * P.O. Box 221 * Ada, Michigan 49301 '•> (616) £76-2666
7402 WertihMo Drive * Suite 110 * Uottoff, Michtgui «9S7 » (517)627-1141
Si Resident Project Represenutive (daily)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
i Report ot job progress and activities. For in-house use only.
Project Name vE, \J ^^T^,\ ^ ~^<=*——•a.-^J.^^A'?^-Contractor ^-A,\ c W ^^r--^^-_^^rNi>>^ s.
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite &:
Project No.DateObserver
Supervisor* Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject Eng
Other TotalComractor's Labor Force
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
(use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
Fishbcdc, Thompton, Cmrr & Hubcr, Jn«.€090 But Fukoa * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, MkJiigin 49301 * (616)676-2666
7402 Westihire Drive » Suite MO • Laminf, Midugin 44917 * (517)617-1141 1WI6A2
Construction Progress ReportLS Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. Fox m-bouso use only.
Project NameContractor
"^<^ c ... r-
Routing:WeatherTemperature ?.,<-^Time onsite s- - A *~
Project No.DateObservor
o
Supervisor Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
OtherContractor's Labor Force
Total
Subcontractors
fr-l \
MAJOR DELIVERIESdo* ..
' V
{use other side toradditiQDal information} ^ ^^ JP
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
Ftshbtck, Thompton, Carr & Huber, lac.6090 East Fulton <• P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 « (616) 676-2666
7402 Weatitorc Drive * Suite 110 * Laniing, Michigtn 49917 * (517)627-1141 10/16^92
PSJ Resident Pfoject Representative (duly)LJ Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff
^Project NameContractor
progress aura activities, hor m-bouso use only.
Routing;WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
,\ Project No. "^DateObserver
Supervisor* CarpentersContractor's Labor Force
Laborers- V
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other ToUl
Subcontractors
*^ rt f~r --1 --
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
AAV
.JL
VISITORS
von
FUhbecfc, Thompson. C*rr & Huber. Inc.6090 Eut Fukoa • P.O. Box 211 • Ad», MicKigui W301 • (616)676-2666
7402 Westihire Drive • Suite 110 • Laming. Michigan 48917 • (517)627-1141
, BY GJ27 JUNlEXC.
07/08/96 13:52 TX/RX NO. 0140 POJ
Construction Progress ReportSi Resident Project Representative (daily)U Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
— f / t O
Report of job progress and activities. For in-bouso use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing;WeatherTemperatureTime oruite
T^g"
en • ca-*»_
Project No,Date
Observor
Cootnctor's Labor ForceSupervison
/Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other ToUi
Subcontractors
Nt 1 E
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
Jr.
<=-l — .
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
FUhbcdc, Thompson. Carr & Kuber, Inc.6090 But FuKoa * P.O. Box 211 « Ada, Miehigu 49301 • (616)676-2666
7402 Westihire Drive * Suite 110 • Uiuinf, Midiigwt 4*917 • (517)627-1141
Resident Project RepresentativeLJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
^ixc^mi 01 juu progress «na activities, i-oir o&~bouse use only.
Project NameContractor
J
Routing:
TemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
vCarpenters Laborers
I
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEING>ERFORMED and
MAJOR DELIVERIES ——
"* {use other side for'' additional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS y_-^-e-
vori
Ftihbecfc, Thompton. Carr & Hubcr, lac.609O Eut Futtoa * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Mkhigtn 49901 » (616)676-2666
7402 Wertihire Drive • Suite 110 • Lannnj, Michigwi 4«917 » (517)627-1141 10/16^92
Construction Progress ReportPC) Resident Project Representative (duly)tJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
f Report of job progress and activities. For m-bousa use only-
Project NameContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperature <^r^Time onsite /^ : <^
Contractor's Labor Force
Project No. /:Date ?y /zObserver -7^
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFUe
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
4- <r^.
-t*\-
{use other side foradditional information}
v •
* ~A * *m~.
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
vort
FUhbeclc. Thompson. Our & Huber, Inc.6090 E*st Fwtoo • P.O. Bon211 - Ad», Michigtn 49301 • (616) $76-2666
7402 Westahire Drive • Suite 110 • Uniioe, Miidugin «917 • (5I7)6r7-I141
Construction Progress Report12 Resident Project Representative (duly)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For io-bouse use only.
Project NameContractor
\f ,-. 0...- N_,-
tflhlllU
Routing:Weather - .Temperature <=^-Timeonsite //: g.
Project No.
Observer
Supervisor* Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other TotalContractor's Labor Force
Subcontractors
C V\ NK-
'ORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
i ••• - _ c^ <r jCuf v^Vrg^v.
{use other side foradditional information}
•v
i DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
van
FUhbcck, Thompton, Carr ft Hubcr, Inc.6090 E*it Fukofl * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Michigan 49301 " (616)676-2666
7402 Wertihire Drive • Suite 110 » Uiwuj, Michigan 49917 * (517)627-1141
UU Resident Project Representative (daily)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
i num **-« vines, riM to-OOUSO UUSC
Project NameContractor
^ V „ y.
Weather _:TemperatureTime onsite
Project No.D{Ue
Observor
Routing:
Supervisor* CarpentersContractor's Labor Force
LaborersZ.
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other TolaJ
Subcontractors
Al
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES <^ .'
A —,^ \ ;
{use other side foradditional information) V__.
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
VOQ
Fwhbeck, Thompson. CJUT & Huber, Inc.6090 Eut Fukoa • P.O. Box 111 * Ada, Michigu 49301 * (616) 676-2666
7402 Wertihire Drive * Suite 110 » Laniing, Michigui 48917 * (517) 627-1141
Construction Progress Report|S Resident Project Representative (duty)LJ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
... ...._7._ ._,—-..——————————————————I Report of job progress and activities- For m-houso use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.1)416
Observor
Supervisor! Caipcnten Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other Total
Subcontractors
Ul 7
YORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES ._ _fl
. \
{use other side foradditional information}
kj /v <—i\x—'
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
Fishbcdc, Thompton. Our &. Hubcr. lac.6090 Eut Fukoa * P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616) 676-2666
7402 Wotihire Drive • Suite 110 * Luubr, Michigan 4*»17 » (517)627-1141 W16/93
[U Resident Project RepneseaQ Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Weather \2^_iv-Temperature <^,v"~'Time onsite (c, —^
Cootractor's Labor Force
tvcyui i 1 Keport as joo progress Midtative (daily) n . . _
Project Name v \j - ^ • .Contractor j^v \ *£ c
_y
Project No. fr^ <^'^^^- <^,Date ^y f ^ ^ c, H •?-/•<Observor ~^ Vi,^^ ^, t- '
Supcrvison Carpenters Laborers
activities- For in-bousa use only.
V-^ ^^> <^^\r^k^-
Routing:Project Mgr ___ _____
, Project Eng ___
Other Tola]
)
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES __^^l
•7——-• * Q
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
VC22
FUhbeck, Thompton, CJJT & Huh*r, Inc.6090 East Futon * P.O. Bojc211 • Ad», Mkhigin ^9301 * (616) €76-2666
7402 Wotiture Drive " Suite 110 • Laiuing, Mi^ui «917 * (517) 677-1141
Construction Progress ReportPI Resident Project RepresenUtiveCD project RepresentativeD Office Staff
WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
f Report of job progress and activities. For in~botuo use only.
Project NameContractor ^5 "f-
Routing:*=,?Project No.
DateObservor ^ VA .<*L .
Project MgrProject Eng
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
\Caipenters Laborers Other Total
SubcontractorsJ 0
VORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
a. .raE~- reX VA\K \~-\L- .-^W JW
(use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
Fishbecfc. Thompwn, Cur & Huber, lac.609O E«t Fultoa « P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Michtgu 49301 • (616)676-2666
7402 WoUhiTe Drive " Suite 110 • Lwuinj, Midiigw 48917 » (517)627-1145! 1W1W97
__- 1—
Construction Progress Report0 Resident Project Representative (daily)ED Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
L - / /. / *e"-"Report of job progress and activities, Fof m-hotue use only.
Project Name _Contractor
Routing:Weather rTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
\Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFUe
Otber Total
Subcontractors
C_\\
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
V.'. < r v .
/ e- >
i ^V*-*-
{use other side foradditional information)
-vr---Jx~ ~
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
\e -
a <.!--.
VISFTORS
von
Fiahbeck. Thompson. Carr &. Huber. loo.6090 Ewt Fukoo • P.O. BoK 211 « Ada, Michigan 49301 • (616) 676-2666
74O2 Wertxture Drive - Suite 110 * Luubif* MilJiigtn «917 * (517)627-1141
LJ Resident Project Representative (daily)ED Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
^__ZHI1:Project NameContractor
. roar m-ftouso use onJy.
Routing;WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other TotalContractor's Labor Force
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
A iM.
NJT
\; --JL (
{use other side forinformatkm}
DISCUSSIONS orDEQSIONS
VISITORS
, Thompson. Cwr & Hubcr. Inc.6090 Eut Fukoo * P.O. Box 211 • Ad», Michigui 49301 • (616) 676-26fi6
7402 WesUhirt Drive » Suite 110 * Laminy, Michigw 4»17 » (317) «Z7-U41
Construction Progress Reportg Resident Project Reprcseouuve (d*Uy)Project Representative
D Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. Foe m-bouce use only.
Project Name J^jContractor
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Cootractor's Labor Force
Project No.DateObserver
/ g..<r-
Supervisor* Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other ToUi
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional Information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
FUhbcdc. Thompson. Cmrr Sc, Huber. loc.6090 East Fukoa - P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, MkhigMi 49301 • (616) CT6-2666
74O2 Weatihire Drive » Sukc 110 * LtuuinE, Mictugtn 48917 » (317) 677-1141 J.0/!6y92
Construction Progress Report£3 Resident Project Representative (duly)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
V. ———————
Weather <L_^^~Temperature *^— > **Time onsite <=T; <,-,
J
( Report of job pn 7 "- V 71°ogress «£id activities. For in-houso use only.
Project Name ^y'_ c^- Oa^^^A-t-^-t^ ^Contractor ^^
Project No. /— *>.v^cDate Y=/e-£-./?Observor ^A/V- C-<
\ ?r-j-vU_rx^V^Routing:
3^1 g^ Project Mgr-^ Project Eng*> ,-..-. irt" File __ _ _ _ . _ _ .
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors Caipentexs Laborers Other Total
Subcontractors
_/ORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
vora
FUhbeck, Thompson. CWT & Huber. Inc.6090 East Fulton - P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigan 49301 " (616)676-2666
7402 Wertihire Drive • Suke 110 * Luuuif. Michigui 48917 * (517)627-1141
Construction Progress ReportJ3 Resident Project Representative (daily)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Weather ^TemperatureTime onsite
Contractor's Labor Force
Report of job progress and activities, fos in-bouso use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing;Project No.Date =?-/Observor -^
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFUe
Other Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
o,\
i /
uc^—CA^*»
/
O-i gJ^
—c :^_ \ v{use other side foradditional information}
\ ~ -——
L \7TJ
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
vora
Fishbecfc, Thompion. Cwr & Huber. Inc.6090&wtFuHoQ « P.O. Box 211 * Ada, MicKigut 49301 • (616) S76-26fi6
7402 Wutxhirc Drive » Suite 110 * Uoriaf, Mirfugin 48917 » (517) 62T-1141 ion 6/91
Resident Project Representative (dajjy)Q Project RepreaeoUtiveD Office Staff
i u* juu pugg-ess ana activities, hor in-Oouso use
Project NameJ
ContractorRouting:
WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.Date
Observor
Contractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
ICupenten Laborers
\
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other TotaJ
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGERFORMED and
MAJOR DELIVERIES
'{use other side foradditional information)
3> <^U_^ £^= £> •»«•-* C* .
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
TP_
vou
FUhbeck, Thompion. Cur & Huber, lac.6090 E«st Fukoo * P.O. Box 211 - Ad*, Michtgui 49301 » (616) CT6-2666
7402 Wertihire Drive - Suite 110 » Lansine, Michigut 48917 " (Si'7) 627-1141
Construction Progress ReportE2 Resident Project Representative (daily)D Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
„Report of job progress and activities- For in-bouso use only.
Project NameContractor
Routing;WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
Cootracior's Labor ForceSupervisor!
\Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFUe
Otber Total
Subcontractors
\ \
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES V C^T-v
\
(use other side foraddittonai inrbrmation} V
C_
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS : vv
Fishbeck, Thompion, Carr & Hubcr, lac.6090 E*st Fulton * P.O. Box 211 - Ada, MichigMi 49301 • (616) CT6-2666
7402 W«st»hire Drive » Suite 110 » Unsinj. Mi.dugtn «917 * (317)627-1141 10/16/93
Resident Project Representative (daily)Project RepresentativeOffice Staff
oujy.
Project NameContractor
J
Routing:Weather <TemperatureTime onsite
Contractor's Labor Force
Project No. \rrDateObserver
Supervisors1
Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngHie
Other ToiaJ
Subcontractors
\\
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
.UJL
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDEQSIONS
r?-.VISITORS
V032
Fishbecfc, Thompwn. C*rr & Hubcr, Inc.6090E«tFultoa • P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Mkhigin 4SJ01 * (616)576-2666
7402 Wauhire Drive • Suite 110 • Unsinf, Midiigtn 4W17 * (517)627-1141
Construction Progress ReportJ3 Resident Project Representative (daily)D Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff
-**• , - uReport ot job progress mad activities. For m-bouso use only.
Project Name _SContractor
Routing;Weather *TemperatureTime onsite
Project No.DateObserver
Supervison CarpentersContractor's Labor Force
Laborers\
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other TolaJ
Subcontractors
CJ^V T
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
d\^~ ^ g= ..
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDEQSIONS
VISITORS
Fishbecfc, Thompton. Cur & Hufacr. Inc.6090 Eut Fuboa * P.O. Box 211 * Ada, Michigan 49301 * (616)676-2666
V072 7402 Westihire Drive • Suite 110 » Lajuing, Michigin 49917 * (517)627-1141
ContractorRouting:
WeatherTemperatureTimeoniitE
Project No.DateObserver
Svpenrison CarpentcnContractor's Labor Force
Laborers_ . l_. .
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other ToUl
Subcontractors
WORK BEING &/&,
MAJOR DEUVEWES *a*-rrv,
£*.
T
{use other side faradditional information) c: \
TV. Ots V
\.
\^-^ V
p\
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
-VISITORS
von
Ftabbwk. Thoonp»on. Cur A. Hubcr. Inc.609O East Futtoa * P.O. Box 211 • Ad*. Mwhigui 49N1 * (616) 6763666
7402 WcsuKms Drive • Suite 110 * Luufef. Michigan 4W17 » (Jl7> 627-II4A MV1&91
CoatractorRouting:
Weather STemperatureTimeonsite
Project No.DateObservor
Supervisors Carpenters
Project Mgrc Project Eng
Other
Ubor F«te
Subcontractors
Tolal
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
c-\- -
-i -i
-N* -S_ -TV.__A- ^TTTT^A-\V -J-*
{use other sida foradditional
^ -^
Us.
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
> . o.s.
'——*"*T
visrroRs
Futbbwfc. Thompson. Cw A Uubcr. Jno,4090 E*it Fubm * P.O. Bos 211 * Ada, Mic&gui 4>,M* • (616)
74Q2 Wcatxhn Drivtt • Sufte 110 » UnHnj. M14u|*a 4«91? * (517)627-1141
Construction Progress Report|^S Resident Project Reprcsenuuve (daUy)CU Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
Report of job progress and activities. For m-bousa use only.
Project NameContractor
^^jCET^r . :Nr^
WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No, /
Observor -
Routing:
Supervisor* Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Otber TotalContractor's Labor Force
Subcontractors
PERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
JSest
>*- »-a f~~t
(use other side foradditional information}
i-c:
A. r-«i*-_
"r—^DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS_______H c
At,
VISITORS
Fishbecfc, Thompwn. Cvr &. Hubcr. Inc.609O E«t Fultoo • P.O. BOK 211 * AiU, Michigui 49301 * (616) CT6-2666
V022 7402 Wertihire Drive * Suite 110 • Luuinff. Midugin 48917 • <517) 627-1141
Construction Progress Report2 Resident Project Repn=scDUUve (daily)PI Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
I Repent af job progress and activities, foi in-bouso use ooJy-
Project Name JE^V s ^^^Contractor »^ t -^,_ ^i_u. .- —^^
-t*-i £lJto»^K.
Routing:WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
°SoProjeaNo.DateObservor
Coatractor's Labor ForceSupervisors
(Carpenters Laborers
/
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other ToUJ
Subcontractors
<r a
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
f
{use other side foradditional information)
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
von
Fwhbeck, Thompton. CMT & Hubcr, Inc.6090 East Fulton • P.O. Box 211 « AoX Michigmn 49301 • (616) 676-2666
7402 Wcatihire Drive - Suite 110 • Unnne, Michigiin «917 * (517)627-1141
Project NameContractor MA I^AIZTM-U
CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTReport of job progress and activities. For in-housc use only.
Project NumberDate g/HObserver
Weather Temperature Time onsite
Labor onsiteContractor/subcontractor Supcrintendant Foreman
J.Laborers Other Total
Equipment onsiteContractor/subcontractor Equipment Hours in use Equipment Hours in use Equipment
Work Being Performed:f
Hours in use
{continued on hack}
Discussions or Decisions
Major Deliveries
Visitors
W019 4/5/94
Project Representative (dajjyj
I ) Project RepresentativeD Office Staff
ULUJ •
Project Name x^ \j _- c
Contractor
Routing:Weather <TemperatureTime onsite
j^~XProjectNo.Date g,Observer
Project MgrProject Eng
Supervisors CarpentersCoatrtcior's Labor force
LaborersI
Other TotaJ
Subcontractors
WORK BHNGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
s: -
-e-T>LC_«rL_O •
A
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS
St Vt*
V072
Fishbeck, Thompion. C*rr & Hubcr. Inc.609O E*rt Fulioa • P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Mkhigtn 49301 • (616)576-2666
7*02 Watihire Drive " Suite 110 « Laming. Michigtn «917 » (317)627-1141
LAJ Xesideoi r^ojeci ^Lprsiseo2_r*fZ3 Project ReprescotatjveD Office Staff
Weather -^~^-A *\_Temperature ^ -^- —Time orisite ?V=^E=
Cootrsctor's Labor Force
Project NameContra ctor
^-^^ Project No. "y_\g:Date &^LuObservor ^§,\M]
Supervisors Carpenters
v '" \ / --" r-^ 'L f-^ V
h-v. -~ ^Ro«tiog^
,^V ^j Project Mgr/^^___ Project Eng
/ \ v***i4^'^^rV F"e
Laborers Other Total
Subcontractors
C
WORK BEINGPERFORMED and
DELIVERIES. ^ x ^ - ^c -
V^c^t
ix ~~^J
^ •
{use other side foradditional information}
DISCUSSIONS orDEQSIONS
I VISITORS~>-S -
von
Fishbeck, Thompion. C»n: & Hubesr. Inc.6090 Eut Futtoa « P.O. Box 211 • AiU, MkOtigu 49301 • (616)
7402 Wesuhire Drive B Suite 110 » Lannaj. Michig«i -«917 * (517) 627-2141
........ . _Ljf Project RepresentativeQ Office Staff
Project Name ^VA"
TemperatureTime onsite
_y
Project No, r=DateObservor
Routing:
vc
Supervisor* CarpentersCootricior's Labor Force
LaborersI
Project MgrProject BugFile
Other TofcU
Subcontractors
WORKBHNGPERFORMED andMAJOR DEUVERIES --^ ?^ //CL
"^TV a_*L<e_ V ~
_^\V
.A %X -vl-Cv{use other side foradditionai information) \ V
t"—————
JSa.
f V^r
DISCUSSIONS orDEaSIONS
VISITORS
von
Fishbedc, Thompton. C*n" & Wubcr. Inc.609O E*at Fukoo * P.O. BOJC 211 • AtU, Michigui 49301 * (616)676-2666
7402 Wauhtre Drive * Suite 110 * Unsinf, Michigan 4S917 » (517) £27-1141 10/J6/92
Projeci RepresenUUve (daily)
Project RepresentativeOffice Staff
Weather ^TemperatureTime onsite
Contractor's Labor Force
Project NaoieContractor
Project No
Observer
Supervisorst
Carpenters Laborers
Project MgrProject EngFile
Other
Subcontractors
Tolal
jy^
WORK BEINGPERFORMED and^vIAJOR DELIVERIES
•I_j
Q » \
i {use other side for, additional information}
•C2-0Q- •-'
DISCUSSIONS orDEaSIONS
;: VISITORS
vozi
Fbhbedc. Thompson. Cair & Huber. Inc.6090 East FuHoo » P.O. Box 211 • Ada, Michigmn 49301 » (616)576-2666
7402 Westihire Drive - Suite 110 • Lanjonf, Michigmn 4«917 • (517)627-1141
Resident Project RepresentsUvc (ckiJy)\/LJ Project Representative
D Office Staff
mix*, i ut m-mxiso use onjy.
Project NameContractor
WeatherTemperatureTime onsite
Project No,
Observer
Project MgrProject Eng
Supervisors Carpenters Laborers OtherContractor's Labor Force
Total
Subcontractors
WORK BEINGPERFORMED andMAJOR DELIVERIES
{use other side foradditional information} ^ga—>^x
DISCUSSIONS orDECISIONS
VISITORS 1 n
V022
Fishbeck, Thompton* Cur & Kubcr, lac.6090 BMA Fultoo • P.O. Box 211 • Ad*, Michigan 49301 • (616)676-2666
74O2 Wcatjhire Drive « Suite 110 • Unsinp. Miidugtn «917 • (517)627-1141
DM& \2fta/iu nut;_.i:.L"_g" uspt
mc7>oono
mxo
o
ELECTRO-VOICE SUPERFUND SITEBUCHANAN, MICHIGAN
LAGOON SOILS REMEDIATION
fishbeck, thompson, carr Sc huberengineers • scientists • architects
Grand Rapids * LansingMichigan
DS/IHINO INTO a3MTO\CO\3i07Qa03 DATE: 12/20/8S TIME: 1:30 pm UgH: 5C
ELECTRO-VOICE SUPERFUND SITEBUCHANAN, MICHIGAN
LAGOON SOILS REMEDIATION fr<>h fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberengineers • scientists " architects
Grand Rapids • lansingMichigan
FINAL CLAY SUBGRADE RECORD DRAWING
na*i«ng iHFCr tuo?a\cn\jjoToa<tt O*IE n/ie/ie TIME a a» pm usm so
NOR
^ !
PRCkECT HQ 1
933D7Q
|
ELECTRO-VOICE SUPERFUND SITEBUCHANAN, MICHIGAN
LAGOON SOILS REMEDIATION
£ 1— fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberTli^rJl engineers * scientists • architectsJ-J-lT^XX Grand Rapids • Lansing
Michigan
,F>,(.
APPENDIX 3SEPTAGE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Report Date: 08/01/96Lab Number: 960700637Date Received: 07/29/96Client ID: 60688
Electro-Voice600 Cecil StreetBuchanan MI 49107
Attention: Mr. Ron Graham
Sample ID: Septic Sludge07/01/96F93307Q, COC No: 5974
Method: EPA 8260A
Notes: Results reported with the "U" flag indicate the parameter wasanalyzed for but not detected in the sample above the detectionlimit. Reported with the detection limit.
Parameter Result Units Analysis Date
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2 -Trichloroethane1, 1-Dichloroe thane1, 1-Dichloroethene1, 2-Dichloroethane1 , 2 -Dichlorobenzene1, 2-Dichloropropane1 , 3 -Dichlorobenzene1 , 4 -Dichlorobenzene2-ChloroethylvinyletherAcetoneBenzeneBromodichlorome thaneBromome thanecis-1, 2-Dichloroethenecis-1, 3-DichloropropeneChlorobenzeneCarbon TetrachlorideBromoformChloroformChloroethaneChlorome thaneCarbon DisulfideDibromochlorome thaneEthylbenzeneMethyl Butyl KetoneMethylene ChlorideMethylethylketoneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneTetrachloroetheneStyrenetrans-1 , 2-Dichloroethenetrans-1 , 3-DichloropropeneTrichloroethene
21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U65021 U21 U84021 U
110021 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 021 U5621 U36110 U21 U
360110 U21 U21 U21 U21 U21 U
ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg
07/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/96
analytical services
Page 2Lab No 960700637
Parameter Result Units Analysis Date
Trichlorof luorome thaneTolueneVinyl ChlorideVinyl AcetateXylenes
21 U79021 U21 U180
ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg
07/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/9607/30/96
Other compounds detected above 20 ug/kg: n-propylbenzene; 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene; 1,2,4-trlmethylbenzene; 1,2, 4-trichlorobenzene;napthalene; cyclohexanes.
Additional Information:
Results should be considered as estimated due to improper samplecontainer and storage conditions. Sample was received by lab after theEPA recommended hold time for analysis. Although retained underrefrigeration prior to delivery to lab, the sample may have beencontaminated by other materials also stored in that location.
:inalvtical services
APPENDIX 4
GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY RESULTS
onsultants. 9661 6 I NflDATE' 6-7-96
PROJECT
CLIENTCONTRACTOR
ENGINEER/ARCHITECT
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505.PHONE (616) 456-5469 - FAX (616) 456-5784 l
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck. Thompson, Carr and Huber
SOIL DESCRIPTION- Dark brown fine to coarse SAND; little gravel, little clay
MAX. DENSITY: 124.5 LBS/CU.FT.' OPTIMUM MOISTURE 10.5 PCT
ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: _Near grid node 5
LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER
PREPARATION PROCEDURE.
119
82696 TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 1557, PROCEDURE A
MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION ASTM D4718
117
115
113
i
11 13 15 17
REMARKS:
MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT)
" The maximum density and optimum moisture content were corrected for 16.8 % oversizematerial retained on the No. 4 sieve per ASTM D 4718.
TESTED 6Y: Doug Hula
Dislnbution 1 -Michigan Earthworks -Mr Kirn Veiling
REVIEWED BY:
T-f'Shbeck, n. Carrie Huber-Mr Jim Susan p
T/»S report has been prepared lor the e*clus<ve use of the cl,ent and any part.al or v.hole reproduction w,thout the consent of She r//em ,sprohibited
YERINGTONAGGREGATE
CONSTRUCT^INSPECTION REPORT
Specification
ispectt
atft Sa
ata Te
^ / yr (, u/Dn\ { A^A— .«d
w (f^TuJ^ ^//y] l/TU/ll/li/S^Sai
mpl«ri / &tfX J\O Prc
ntcd / O&} "" / {i/ , , f^n
urc* of Materia
tipled From _^
xluced
ntracto
t lnt«wtediJ«« ( S^J-l-
?>£ fids ^M. r\(]W JWIMZfly / / /// /_ Raquimir
r
wntt.
SPECIFICATIONS6A
;
10095-100
30-60
~o*~
20AA
100
95-1000640
45-661
0-10-2.S^9
»*Sp«C(MS
2040
0-7
40%
20A
100
6&86
40-60
20-35
0-7
28X
206
100
6040
4O«5
2040
2-10
fci- — -nonv
20C
10080-100
65-06
3O«0
15-40
0-10
22A
10090-100
66-85
30-50
44
25%
23A
100
60-8S
2540
9-16
26A
10095-10060-0010300-12
0-30-50-6
0-695%
31A
1000&-10035450-36
03040-5
0-1595%
2NS
10095-10066-0636-7520-5610-300-10
0-3
3CS
10096-10070-9545-7526-6515-3S0-10
0-5
^W
100
4E45
2&«&
5-30
0-5
"IT100
60-100<i
<
0-30
0-7"
SIEVE OPENING3" Sim*2-1/2" Sim2"Stwi1-1/2" Siwt
"sUi1 .t
No. 4 St«wN0.8&4V.No. 16 Sl«v*No.30SltMNo. 50 Stov*No. lOOSwvt
N 200«SM^A
TO
TA
L PE
RC
ENT
PA
SS
ING
LoMByWMhlngSoft PfciWwSum of Soft P*rt. ft CtwrtIncrutttd PitrtidMThin or Efort. PvtlctHCrwfwd MrarW-Mln.
It is C-<--tijQA ^1_ —-
— -•Specif icati
Initial Wai it of SvnpN ^ f
Wtiflht Afttr Wnhing ~}~
P«ifl0No.2001el.y&»ltt ^
Httatned Fractional
WtlDht
^s.OOO . <2OO o*:>
1 *^Oi? -6>ff^-?"cto-5'JolCa.^
0"^^w^^-'' tS" f . (O
^ ^. J5
SO. 2-
-I _
F*trc*nt
O. /--iD- O<>-O
f 14.TS-4K.^S5.^Lio_3
Itfjf Gf*
></ r" u'r1)n.2- ' Gmi
PtrcenU CumuUtiv*
R«t«n«d
O.Oo- O0,0
*f • ^r*i.*2.0^4.2,5^.G»1<? y^?| 1^iA./DA
o« . IV
Passing
, JQO1 O*i
/ t\t}£&&•<%
<^<~~
..SO
U£>2/)-JLci
"out Accunulatcd Cydt. to D*w
'Onsultants ;,c693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE {616} 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
TO Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber6090 East FultonAda, Michigan 49301
DATE
ATTENTION
RE:
6/18/96Jim Susan,
JOB NO. X0271P/E.
ElectrovoiceLaboratory Soil Tests
WE ARE SENDING YOU |~>T| Attached |~ | Under separate cover via the followinq items:
I | Test Boring Logs | | Prints f | Plans | | Samples | | Specifications
| | Copy of letter | | Data Sheets |"x~| Test Reports
S'
COPIES DATE
6/17/96
NO.
2
DESCRIPTION
Grain Size Distribution Test Reports
nTHESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I | For approval I I Return
| X | For your use
| X | As requested
[ | For review and comment
REMARKS
corrected prints
;OPY TO X0271SIGNED _____.."• ——— r* f ..•^.M * -r.-
Peter J/JohnsonLaboratory Manager
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
onsultants.INC.693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
PROJECT NO.:DATE:
SHEET:
X027'6-10-96
OF
PROJECT
CUENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck. Thompson. Carrand Huber
WEATHER: Cloudy LOW TEMP. F: 70 HIGH TEMP, F: 70
ft—-
Type of Test Taken:
Samples of soils were obtained.
Worfc Areas:
The soil excavation at the west end of the Electrovoice Building in Buchanan was in progress.
Remarks, Problems & Solutions:
A trip was made to the Yerington Brothers brown pit #14-64, north of Buchanan. The purpose was toinvestigate the potential use of ciay soils at this pit for the project at the Electrovoice site. The excavator hadprepared five test holes in the area which were expected to have cohesive soil appropriate for use. Under thedirection of FTC&H representative Dave Conklin, samples were obtained from the test pit areas of ciay soil. Atthe time of obtaining the samples, a decision was yet to be made if any of these soils would be used, since thequantity was relatively small and availability difficult because of overlying depths of non-usable material.
Soil visible in test pits:
Test pit #2: 0-2' topsoil mixed with silty clay; 2-8' light brown silty clay, trace sand (bag samplerecovered); 8-10' brown sand, trace clay.
Test pit #4: 0-3' topsoil and clay mixture; 3-7' sandy, silty clay; 7-1V light brown silty clay (bagsample recovered).
Appropriate personnel on-sfte were informed of test results
Appropriate personnel were not present on-srte lo receive test results
TESTED BY: Scott Zeeryp REVIEWED BY:
Distribution (l)-Mtchigan Earthworks-Mr Kim Veiling (l)-Fishbeck. Thompson. C.irr and Huber-Jim Susan. P E
Tr-.ts report has been prepared for (he exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client isprohibited
o;uz:i—iu.
100
90
80
70
60
z: 50u
LJ 40Q_
30
20
10
200 100 10,3 1.0 0.1GRflIN SIZE - mm
0.81 0. 001
X +3" GRAVEL SAND 5ILT CLAY0.0 0.5 ^4.6 38.2 36.7
LL PI DBS0. 176 0.0136 0.0029
MflTERIflL DESCRIPTION uses RfiSHTO
* Lean c l a y w i t h sand CL
Project No.: X0271Project: Electrovoice• Location: Test Hole No.4 Bag, 9' depth
Date: 6-17-96
G R f l I N SI2E D I S T R I B U T I O N TEST REPORT
M^TERIRLS TESTING CONSULTflNTS
Remarks:
tloisture Content = 16
F ig . No
•
•
100
80
70
LJ
5 60U-
z: 50u
Ld 40D_
30
20
10
020
Pfbit
c
or
?PTN ^TT^F HTCTTPTFIS ITTflN TF^T PFPHPTxMJLST CD J_ L. C- 1_J JL ,3 1 rxJLlJLJ 1 JLwl i 1 C_CJ S rvLLr^^lIx 1
c c c;- (\j - -^ « ^-
C C \ t: CJ CJ— « — T^ — » ^" t\J CO Q ^ dO ^ T G J
\ X \ . X " 1 ~ • - * f1-! T < J > " - " M(Tl CO --H *-< pi v4 CO * ••• ** • * • * - * * •
0
. ' — * •_ **
!
;
:
\
* «*
;
:
k
H
:
1
I SSSS\s^ v
Sk\^
100 10.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001GRRIN SIZE - mm
X +3"0.0
LL
24
X GRAVEL2.0
X SflND23.4
X SILT42.8
y. CLAY31.8
PI
10DBS
0.209
D60 ^500.0172
D30I 0.0048
DIS
MflTERIfiL DESCRIPTION
* Lean clay with sand
Project No. : X0271
Project: El ectro^o i ce
• Locat ion: Test Ho IB No, 2 Bag f 5 ' depth
Date: 6-17-96
GRflllH SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
MftTERIftLS TESTING CONSULTANTS
DIB
usesCL
c Cu
fifiSHTO
Remarks :
Moisture Content =
F i g . N n , :
iz.$y.
sultants, 9661 G o inrINC.
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDSnMt 39503PHONE (616) 456-5469 « FAX (616) ' * B
TO Fishbeck Thompson Carr & Huber6090 E. FultonAda, Ml 49301
DATE
ATTENTION
RE:
7/1/96Jim Susan
JOB NO. X0271
Electro- VoiceLaboratory Soil Test Results
WE ARE SENDING YOU
I | Test Boring Logs
I | Copy of letter
I X | Attached | | Under separate cover via
f~~] Prints | | Plans
I | Data Sheets | |
the following items:
| | Samples | I Specifications
COPIES
i
DATE
6/27/96
6/21/96
NO.
2
2
DESCRIPTION
Hydraulic Conductivity Test Report
Report of Laboratory Compaction Test
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:[ I For approval j j Return _
I X | For your use |" | ____| X | As requestedI | For review and comment
REMARKS
corrected prints
COPY TO File X0271SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
Peter T. Johnson.aboratory Manager
onsultants.INC.
PROJECTCLIENT
CONTRACTOR
ENGINEER/ARCHITECT
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck. Thompson, Carr and Huber
SOIL DESCRIPTION: Dark brown clayey SAND, little gravel____
MAX. DENSITY: _____125.0 LBS/CU.FT.*
ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: Excavated soil. Northwest corner of project
OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 10.0 PCT.
LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER:
PREPARATION PROCEDURE
121
82850 TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 1557, PROCEDURE A
MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION: ASTM D 4718
119
117
11
\V
11 13 15
REMARKS:
MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT)
" The maximum density and optimum moisture content were corrected for 12.3 % oversizematerial retained on the No. 4 sieve per ASTM D4718.
TESTED BY: Steve Grooters
Distribution: I-Michigan Earthworks-Mr Kim Veiling
REVIEWED BY:
1-Fishbeck. Thompson, Carrbod Huber-Mr Jim Susan. P 6
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the clientprohibited
e sting MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber
DATE: 6-27-96
MTC SAMPLE NO.: 82783 TEST DATE: 6/26/S6
SAMPLE LOCATION: Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit, #14-64, test hole #4
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown lean clay with sand
TYPE OF SAMPLE: Remolded to 91.2% of ASTM D 1557 maximum density
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - INITIAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.84 AREA (IN2):
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 118.1 WATER CONTENT (%): 13.7
6.51
TYPE OF PERMEANT: De-aired tap water
MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE USED (PSI): 80.0
MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS. 6.0 psi
MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 3.0 psi
HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 29.3
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - FINAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.79 AREA (IN2): 6.51
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 120.2 WATER CONTENT (%): 14.3
AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 6.0 x lO"8
TESTED BY: PJ REVIEWED BY:: r-^J=^U&fi^*~^^PETER T. JQ/NSONLABORATORY MANAGER
Distribution: 1-Michigan Earthworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling 1-Fisnbeck, Thompson. Carr and Huber-Mr Jim Susan
e stinginsultants..Nc.
MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMjchigan EarthworksMjchigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Can* and Huber
DATE: 6/25/96
MTC SAMPLE NO.: 82782 TEST DATE: 6-24-96
SAMPLE LOCATION: Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit #14-64, test hole #2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown lean CLAY with sand
TYPE OF SAMPLE: Remolded to 91.4% of ASTM D 1557 maximum density
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - INITIAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.84 AREA (IN2):
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 118.8 WATER CONTENT (%): 14.1
6.51
TYPE OF PERMEANT: De-aired tap water
MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE USED (PSI): 70.0
MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 6.0 psi
MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 3.0 psi
HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 29.3
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - FINAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.81 AREA (IN2): 6.51
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 120.1 WATER CONTENT (%): 14.5
AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 4.2 x 1Q-8
TESTED BY: PJ REVIEWED BY:PETER T. JOHNSONLABORATORY MANAGER
Distribution: 1-Michigan Eartfiworks-Mr. Kim Vetting 1-Fishbeck. Thompson. Cair arid Huber-Mr. Jim Susan
PROJECT NO
DATEX0271
"6/20/96"
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTOR
ENGINEER/ARCHITECT
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson. Carr and Huber
SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown lean CLAY with sand
MAX, DENSITY: 129.5 LBS/CU.FT. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 10.0 PCT.
ORIGIN OF SAMPLE. Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit, #14-64, test hole #4
LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER:
PREPARATION PROCEDURE: _
130
82783 TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 1557, PROCEDURE A
MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION: NONE
126
122
118
11 13 15
REMARKS:
TESTED BY: DH
Distribution: 1-Michigan Earthworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling
MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT)
REVIEWED BY: f~^&*=^->f1-fcw-^-~-——
1-Fishbeck, Thompson, Can aM Huber-Mr, Jim Susan
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client isprohibited.
LMJ ate rialsLCPe sting
onsultants.PROJECT NO. X0271
DATE: 6/21/96
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan Earthworks_________Fishbeck, Thompson, Carrand Huber
SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown lean CLAY with sand
MAX. DENSITY: 130.0 LBS/CU.FT. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 9.5 PCT.
ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: Yerington Brothers, Brown Pit #14-64, test hole #2
LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER:
PREPARATION PROCEDURE:
132
82782 TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 1557, PROCEDURE A
MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION: NONE
128
124
120
\\
\
11 13 15
REMARKS:
TESTED BY: PJ
Distribution; l-Micf.'gan Earthworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling
MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT)
REVIEWED BY:
1-Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr ija Huber-Mr. Jim Susan
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client isprohibited
FROM : SEBC LPNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166954230 JuK 01 996 10:51flM Pi
ifl/ightmaii Environmental, Inc. ^934-7707ENVIRONMENTAL AND TESTING SERVICES
4050 SOUTH PIPESTONE BO.P.O. BOX 95
SODUS, MICHIGAN 48126 )095
March 10, 1995
Southeast Berrien County Landfill3200 Chamberlain RoadBuchanan, Michigan 49107
Attn: Mr. Bruce Knapp
RE: SOIL TESTING
Dear Bruce:
As requested, two soil samples, labelled the Krause site and the Marschke site werecollected and analyzed for various parameters. The purpose of the testing was todetermine if the soil samples would b© suitable for construction of solid waste liners. Bothsample results look good. We should point out the permeability of the Marschke site wasover allowable rate of 1.00 x 10"7 centimeters per second, but the soil is classified as CLsoil.
The other good point about these samples is that the plasticity index for them is wellbelow 18. As a rule of thumb, fine grained soils with a plasticity index less than 18 arefairly easy to compact over a slightly larger moisture range, as compared to other finegrained soils.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
WIGHTMAN ENVIRONMENTAL, INC,
Jon M. Hermann
JMH/afp
Mienigantarcrrtofxs.lnc. i-ax: (616)363-0018 Voice:(516)563-0001 To:Jim$usan atFTOH Page IcflO Monday,JulyOI, 199610:15:
FAXDate: Monday, July 01,1996 Time: 10:11:00 AM 10 Pages
To: Jim Susan From: Kim J. VeltingFTC&H Michigan Earthworks, Inc.
Fax: 676-8173 Fax: (616) 363-0018Voice: 676-2666 Voice: (616)363-0001
Comments:
Here are the test results for the material from Pelley Exc,Please let me know as soon as possible if this is acceptable.
n:
•iurii.wnu veiling MicniganbutriwofXs,inc. hax:(bib|»wiw Voice:(bibjAMWi o:Jtm Susan atHUH Page 4 of 10 Monda^JulyQIJSM 1Q;17:33/'
FROM : SEBC LRNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166SS4230 Jul. 01 1996 10:52PM P3
SUMMARY SHEET
South East Benrien County Landfill
Sample Sample
Krause Site Marschfce Site
Percent Gravel 0.0 1.0Percent Sand 31.4 41.2Percent Silt 46.1 37.0Percent Clay 22.5 20.8Liquid Limit 27.4 31,0Plastic Limit 16.3 17.5Plasticity Index 11.1 13.5U.S.C.S. Classification CL CLModified Proctor Max. Density (pcf) 125.7 123.9Proctor Optimum Water Content (%) 11.1 10.6Permeability @ 70 deg F (cm/sec) 9.61 x 10-8 1.38 x 10-7Permeability Density (pcf) U2.8 112.8Percent of Modified Proctor (%) 89.7 91.1
Krause Stockpile
Percent Gravel 7.3Percent Sand 74.6Percent Silt & Clay 1S.1U.S.C.S. Classification SM
FROM : SEBC LflNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 13:52flM P2
0395-1358 Shilts, Graves & Associates, Inc.2 March 1995
Wightman Environmental, Inc.4050 S. Pipestone Rd.P.O. Box 95Sodus, Michigan 49126-0095
Attn: Mr. Jon Hermmann
Re: Laboratory TestsSE Benien Co. LandfillBag Samples
Gentlemen:
We have completed laboratory tests requested on the bag samples of soil delivered to ouroffice on 22 February 1995. The following tests were performed:
ASTM C136 Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse AggregatesASTM Dl 140 Amount of Material in Soils Finer Than the No. 200 SieveASTM D422 Particle Size Aoatysis of Soils (Hydrometer Tests)ASTM D4318 Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of SoilASTM D2487 Classification of Soils for Engineering PurposesASTM D1557 Modified Proctor Moisture - Density Relationship
Falling Head Permeability
Attached is a summary sheet with the tabulated results of the tests performed, along withthe grainsize curves and proctor curves of the samples tested.
If you have any questions or if we may be of farther assistance, please do not hesitate tocontact our office.
Sincerely,
SHILTS, GRAVES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
John J. Warner, CPGGeologist &, Sr. Engineering Technician
JJWrtmpEncls.
Veiling Michigan Eartnwofks, Inc. Fax.
: SEBC LRNDFILL
Voice; (616) 3634001 To; Jim Susan at FfC&H
PHGNE NO. : 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:b4fin P5
r
FRO1 : SEBC LPNDFILL PHONE NO., 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:56fiM P?
Shite, Graves and Associates, inc.1103 South Bend AvenueSouth Bend, Indiana 46617-1419Phone: (219)233-6820 FAX: (212)233-8242
ASTM C-136 Sieve Analysis of Rne and Course AggregatesASTM C-1 17 Materials Finer Than 75 Micron (No. 200) Sieve
In Mineral Aggregates by WashingClient,* Wightman Environmental, inc.
Project: SEBCL Karuse StockpileDescription: Brown Silly Sand
.Sample No.: 73005File: wrtHio40
Sieve Size: 12- diameterDate Sampled : 22-Feb-85
Received : 22-Feb-95Report Date: 27-Fet>95
Sample + TareTare
Net Sample
Before Wash(grams)
731.8292.3459.5
Washing Loss
Sieve Size1-1/2"
1"3/4"1/2"3/8"
No. 4No. 8No, 10NO. 16No. 30NO. 4ONo. 50No. 100No. 200
PanLoss
Weight Retained(grams)
0.06.7
25.320.4
6.7L 18.1
36.537.562.9
104.9
Distribution:Client
After Wash(grams)
657.9292.3365.673.9
PercentRetained
0.0960.0%0.0%0.0%1.5%5.8%4.6%1.5%4.1%8.3%j8.5%
14.3%23.9%
PercentPassing
100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%98,5%92.7%88.1%86,6%82.4%)74.1%65.6%51.3%27.4rJ
40.9 9.3%l 18.1%5.7
73.9Total 439.5
1.3%J16.8%
:rwrt;KimJ.Vetong Michigan Earitiwoto, Inc. Far (616)3630018 Voice: (616) 3634001 To: Jim Susan zt FTCJH
FROM : SEBC LPNDFILL PHONE NO. : 6166954230
Page 7 of tO Monday, JulyOt, 199610:20:04 Afc
Jul. 01 1996 10:55RM P6
...... ——————————• .—— ————L.
FROM : SE3C LPNDFILL- PHONE NO. 616S954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:57ftN P9
Shilts, Graves and Associates, Inc.1103 Soutii Bend AvenueSouth Bend, Indiana 46617-1419Phone: (219)233-6820 FAX: (219)233-6242
ASTM D-1557
Client:Project:
Description:
Sample No.:File:
Sample Date:Sampled By:
Received:Report Date:
Maximum Dry
Laboratory Compa<:tion Characteristics of Soil UEffort ( 56.000 ft-lbf/cf)WIghtman Environmental, Inc.Bag Sample SEBCI.Marschke Site
7300673006SP
WIghtman22-Feb-9527-Feb-95
sing Modified
Distribution:Client
Density = 123.9 pcf Optimum Me = 10.6percent
oo•3.£*"wiQ•>,Q
I H.LT
123.0-
122.O-
121.0-
120.0-
119.0-
11S.O-
117.0-
116.0-
115.0-
££.
m
•j
114.0- —————— . —————— T--— ——— i —— -s --- —— r ———— -< ————— ,7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11,0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15
Percent Moisture
Data Points —^~ Maximum
FROM : SE3C LANDFILL PHONE NO. 6166954230 Jul. 01 1996 10:56fiM P8
Shilts, Graves and Associates, Inc.1103 South Bend AvenueSouth Bend. Indiana 46617-1419Phone: (219)233-6820 FAX: (219)233-8242
ASTM 0-1557
Client:Project:
Description:
Sample No.:File:
Sample Date:Sampled By:
Received:Report Date:
Maximum Dry
Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using ModifiedEffort ( 56,000 ft-lbf/cf)Wightman Environmental, Inc.Bag Sample SEBCLKrause Site-
7300773007SP
Wightman22-Feb-9527-Feb-95
Distribution:Client
Density = 125.7 pcf Optimum MC = 11.1 percent
Dry
Dens
ity (p
cf)
125.0-
124.0-
123.0-
122.0-
121.0-
120.0-
119.0-
118.0-
———————
S!
•
117.0- —————— i—S.O 9.0
•
10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0Percent Moisture
" Data Points — — Maximum ;
9 0 NO X0271
•^693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
DATE 7-12-96SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber
WEATHER: Overcast, warm LOW TEMP, F: 75 HIGH TEMP, F: 75
Type of Test Taken:
Sampled clay barrow pit.
Work Areas:
Muranski Pit, east of Buchanan, Michigan.
Remarks, Problems & Solutions:
Met with Blake Minert of FTC&H at the Electro-Voice site in Buchanan, Michigan. The writer followed Mr.Minert to Pelly Excavating's Muranski Pit east of Buchanan on Rauge Line Road. A representative sample ofthe clay being used at the Electro-Voice Site was taken. The soil was a brown sandy lean clay with gravel andcobbles. Returned to lab with sample.
Appropriate personnel on-site were informed of test results
Appropriate personnel were not present on-site to receive test results
TESTED BY: Scott Thompson REVIEWED BY:
Distribution: (l)-Michigan Earthworks-Mr. Kim Veiling }-Fishbeck, Thompson. Caff and Huber-Jim Susan. P E
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of She client iprohibited.
b^uatenals'e sting MTC PROJECT NO.. X0271
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson. Carr_a_nd Huber__
DATE 7-22-96
pur, 0 8^ -v f * &*. i. •—
MTC SAMPLE NO.: 84141 TEST DATE: 7/19/96
SAMPLE LOCATION: Muranski Pit. Pelley Excavating, Buchanan, Michigan
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown sandy lean clay
TYPE OF SAMPLE: Remolded to 91.0% of ASTM D 1557 maximum density
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - INITIAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.84 AREA (IN2):
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 114.2 WATER CONTENT (%): 15.4
6.51
TYPE OF PERMEANT: De-aired tap water
MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE USED (PSI): 75.0
MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 5.0 psi
MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 2.0 psi
HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 19.5
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - FINAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.88 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.83 AREA (IN2): 6.51
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 114.6 WATER CONTENT (%): 16.3
AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 5.6 x 10'8
TESTED BY: PJ REVIEWED BY:PETER T. J.O/INSONLABORATORY MANAGER
Oistnbution 1-Michigan Earth works-Mr. Kim Veiling 1-Fisht>ec!<. Thompson. Carr and Huber-Mr Jim Susan
LJv_vLJPROJECT NO. X0271
DATE. ~1Tl4-9t
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber
SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown lean clay with sand
MAX. DENSITY: 122.0 LBS/CU.FT. OPTIMUM MOISTURE: 10.5 PCT.
ORIGIN OF SAMPLE: North face of Pellie clay source
LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER:
PREPARATION PROCEDURE:
124
85239 TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 1557. PROCEDURE A
MOIST OVERSIZE CORRECTION: NONE
120
116
112
10 12 14 16
REMARKS:
TESTED BY: SG
Distribution: 1-Michigan Earttiworlis-Mr Kirn Veiling
MOISTURE CONTENT (PERCENT)
REVIEWED BY:
1-Fishbeck. Thompson. Carr and
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the cli°nt and any partial or whole reproduction without (he consent of the client isprohibited.
LxSJaterials'estinginsurants.™.
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRANDERAfilQSi ^1-49505 ; ,1PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784* ^ "'* ^
TO Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber6090 East FultonAda, Michigan 49301
DATE
ATTENTION
RE:
8/26/96 JOB NO. X0271Dave Conklin
Electro- VoiceLaboratory Soil Tests
WE ARE SENDING YOU
| | Test Boring Logs
| I Copy of letter
the following items:| X_ | Attached | | Under separate cover via
I j Prints j | Plans | | Samples | | Specifications
| | Data Sheets
COPIES DATE
8/14/96
8/16/96
8/22/96
8/13/96
8/21/96
NO.
1
2
2
1
2
DESCRIPTION
Report of Laboratory Compaction TestPermeability Test Report (Flexible Wall)Permeability Test Report (Constant Head)
MOOT Class II Test
Grain Size Distribution Test Reports with USCS
T T
)L
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
I [ For approval | | Return „| X | For your use [ | _____
| X | As requested
| | For review and comment
REMARKS
corrected prints
COPY TO X0271 FileSIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
ter T. JohnsonLaboratory Manager
esting'Onsultants,
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 " FAX (616) 456-5784
MTCJOBNO.: X0271DATE: 8-16-96
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan Earthworks
Fishbeck, Thompson, C;jrr& Huber
MTC SAMPLE NO.: 85496
SAMPLE LOCATION; Low area fill site
DESCRIPTION OF SOIL: Brown fine to coarse SAND; trace fines
SAMPLE AREA (cm2): 46.8
SAMPLE LENGTH (cm): 7.62
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 114.8
MOISTURE CONTENT (%): 7.7
TEST DATA
TEST DATE: 8-14-96
TESTNUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
MANOMETERSHI
11.0
9.9
9.2
8,5
15.7
15.1
H2
9.4
7.7
6.5
5.4
11.7
10.6
HEADH(CM)
1.6
2.2
2.7
3.1
4.0
4.5
QUANTITYQ (CM3)
430.6
290.6
279.3
352.1
343.4
417.2
TIMET(SEC.)
1500
720
600
660
480
540
Q/AT
0.006
0.009
0.010
0.011
0.015
0.017
H/L
0.21
0.29
0.35
0.41
0.52
0.59
TEMPERA-TURE(°C)
25.2
25.4
25.5
25.6
25.7
25.5
COEFFICIENT OFPERMEABILITY
(CM/SEC.)
2.6 X ID'2
2.6 X ID"2
2.5X10-2
2.5X10-2
2.5x10-2
2.5x10-2
TESTED BY: Pete Johnson
Distribution: 1: Michigan Earthworks - Mr Kirn Vetting
REVIEWED BY:
Fishbeck. Thompson. CarrS Huber-Mr Jim Susan
This report has been prepared (or tfie exclusive use of ttte client and any partial or whole teprotfuction without tne consent o! the client is prolrbited
t—(\_A_ICUGI
"ripe sting©onsultants.iNc693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS, Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
MTCJOBNO-: X0271DATE: 8-22-96
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan Earthworks
Fishbeck. Thompson, Can & Huber
MTC SAMPLE NO.: 85773
SAMPLE LOCATION: Drainage layer
DESCRIPTION OF SOIL: Brown fine to coarse SAND; (MOOT Class II)
SAMPLE AREA (cm2): 46.8
SAMPLE LENGTH (cm): 7.62
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 115.8
MOISTURE CONTENT (%): 6.1
TEST DATA
TEST DATE: 8-22-96
TESTNUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
MANOMETERSHi
12.8
12.4
11.7
10,8
10.0
9.3
H2
11.5
10.6
9.3
8.1
6.8
5.6
HEADH(CM)
1.3
1.8
2.4
2.7
3.2
3.7
QUANTITYQ (CM3)
164.7
172.3
257.6
211.8
258.5
250.1
TIMET{SEC.)
600
480
540
360
420
360
Q/AT
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.013
0.013
0.015
H/L
0.17
0.24
0.31
0.35
0.42
0.49
TEMPERA-TURE(°C)
24.4
24.6
25.2
26.6
24.3
24.3
COEFFICIENT OFPERMEABILITY
(CM/SEC.)
3.1 X10"2
2.9X ID'2
2.9x1 0-2
3.0x10-2
2.8 x ID'2
2.8x10-2
f "
t.J
TESTED BY: P. Johnson
Distribution: 1 Michigan Earthworks - Mr. Kim Veiling
REVIEWED BY;
• Mr. JFishbecK. Thompson, Carr 8. Huber -Mr. Jim Susan,
THIS report has been prepared (or the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of (he client is prohibited.
estingonsultants.i*c
MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml -J9505PHONE (616) 456-5469 " FAX (616) 456-57S4
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber
DATE: 8-16-96
MTC SAMPLE NO.: 85240 TEST DATE:
SAMPLE LOCATION: N. 3 + 08, E. 4 +84
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Clayey sand (SC)
TYPE OF SAMPLE: Undisturbed
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - INITIAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.86 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.84
8-9-96
AREA (IN2): 6.42
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 117.0 WATER CONTENT (%): 14.5
TYPE Of= PERMEANT: De-aired tap water
MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE USED (PSI): 70.0
MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 6.0 psi
MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 3.0psi
HYDRAULIC GFtADIENT: 29.3
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - FINAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.85 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.83 AREA (IN2): 6.38
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 118.2 WATER CONTENT (%): 15.3
AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC):3.4 x 10'8
TESTED BY: P. Johnson REVIEWED BY:PETER T. JOffNSONLABORATORY MANAGER
Distribution: 1-Michigan Eartriworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling i-Fishbeck. Thompson, Carr and Huber-Mr Jim Susan
M H..M "• • ————
i_resting MTC PROJECT NO.: X0271
693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
PROJECTCLIENTCONTRACTORENGINEER/ARCHITECT
Electro-VoiceMichigan EarthworksMichigan EarthworksFishbeck, Thompson, Carr and Huber
DATE: 8-15-96
tilMTC SAMPLE NO.: 85239 TEST DATE: 8-14-96
SAMPLE LOCATION: North face, Pellie clay source
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Sandy lean CLAY (CL)
TYPE OF SAMPLE: Remolded to 90% of ASTM D 1557 maximum density
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - INITIAL
DIAMETER {IN.}: 2.87 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.85 AREA (IN2):
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 109.9 WATER CONTENT (%): 17.2
6.47
TYPE OF PERMEANT: De-aired tap water
MAXIMUM BACK PRESSURE USED (PSI): 80.0
MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 6.0 PSI
MINIMUM EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION STRESS: 3.0 PSI
HYDRAULIC GRADIENT: 29.1
SAMPLE DIMENSIONS - FINAL
DIAMETER (IN.): 2.87 HEIGHT (IN.): 2.82 AREA (IN2): 6.47
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCF): 111,1 WATER CONTENT (%): 17.7
AVERAGE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (CM/SEC): 2.7 X 1Q-8
TESTED BY: P. JOHNSON REVIEWED BY:PETER T. JOHWSONLABORATORY MANAGER
Distribution: 1-Michigan Eanhworks-Mr. Kirn Veiling 1-Fishbeck, Thompson. Carr and Huber-Mr. Jirn Susan
o;Ld
b.
80
70
60
£ 50uiO
£ 400-
30
20
10
200 100
\
10.0 1 .0 0 .1GROIN SIZE - mm
0.01 0.901
+3" GRAVEL y. SRND SILT CLOY0.0 8.3 42.4 27.5 . B
LL PI D30 D 15 '1025 11 1.24 0.172 0.0B13 0.0124 0.0019
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION uses ftfiSHTO
Clayey sand SC
Project M o . : X0371Project: E l e c t r o - V o i ce
* Loca t ion : Tube sample , N 3-1-88, E 4 + 94 C8-6-96)
Date: 8-21-96
GRflIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT
MQTFPTDI Q8 irl 1 tl,r\XrlL.O
Remarks
85240
Fig. Mo.
cL?e stingOonsultants,iHc.693 PLYMOUTH N.E. GRAND RAPIDS. Ml 49505PHONE (616) 456-5469 • FAX (616) 456-5784
Michigan Earthworks1931 Will Street N.W.Grand Rapids, MI 49504
Attention: Mr. Kim Velting
Project: Electro-Voice
Date 08-13-96Project No. X0271
Source Location:Sampled By:Sample Date:Tested By:Test Date:Lab Sample No.:Material Specification:
E - V: Low area fill site.Client7-23-96DH8-13-9685496MDOT CLASS II
1 iL
MECHANICAL ANALYSIS (ASTM C136)
Sieve Size Cumulatrve Percent Pass3"1"
No. 4No. 10No. 20No. 40No. 100
100100978265427
Spec. Req.100
60-100
0-30
Loss By WashResult: 4 % Specs: 0-7 %
Remarks: The sample tested met the MDOT CLASS n requirements for loss by wash and grading.
Reviewed by:Peter T. Jo j tonLabo ratorManager
cc: )- Fishbcck, Thompson. Can & Hubcr ~ Mr. Jim Susan, P.E.
) AGGREGATE INSPECTS >EPORT
Source of Mrterial
Sampled Fram _
Produced By __
Intended Usa
This Miterfit
Hequiremants. It is
ipecificai
8ttTe ? - \<C -^0 -| ? l^- Cnntrsctoi . . . . . .
SPEC/F/CAr/OWS6A
too35-100
3040
&4
0-1Q-3.fi04
«i&p«c0-1 S
20AA
10095/1 CO
ea«o
45.55
30-40
0-7
40%
3QA
100
6&8S
4040
2046
0-7
JH%
MB
LJ99J
6040
4046
30-40
2-10
Nont
aoc
100BC-10C
6944
3040
1640
0-10
22A
too90-1CO
etas
3040
44
25%
23A
100
6048
3540
9-1fl
2SA
tooOE-1004040t0400-12
040404
0-695%
31 A
•
100S6-100S54fio-as
04O404
o-ts95%
2W3
1009S-1006&4B3B-76204610400-10
04
305
10099-KM704545-7S2MB16480*10
04
dm
100
4MB
204*
040
04
Jittoo
60-10C
0-30
0-7
-
SIEVE OPENING5" Slow2-1S2"8tw*2"S«n1-1/2" Blw*1"S«M
3M"fii*-«1/2-tttve3/8"SltueNo.4Stw*No.8ffi«v»No. 1 S SWVtt4o.3D5lM*No.COSicw
EHC
ENT
P/\S
SIN
G
a.j
SsNo.tOOSlvv« I ^Ng^aOO^avtLataByWnhktgSoftFtrtkfosSum of Soft Part, a Ctoliwmmd PaniolMTtifn Of Slon- C«rtici4»CruiMd MatwUHMIn.
IH.,
Initial Wa&n of Svnpli \£^ 2-p-' f^--- G
MUN^aDBI^kM 0
R.ttlMdFnatiQn.1 Pwwm Cumulative
WtJftht
6.Of^ *3*
-35'"^5a,~7.l&pTr-ff0tt '3-i*ii .9JlHIl 1
5li, 7rtfyS"* I
*• «s
- -1S"lte.qOrA__^. 1Q ,^X
. c20ii-^t/f j^i*i «*j
/^o
R*UlnM
o. 0f -$•£>S1"*(^ .i^P^*^£\*&^ipf iifji'^i^^i^/rtO
-^^— sP-—3?. . .. a ^
,7/p. ,,U->S^S-§*..IJ
•fe
!
_J ———
"otat AccumuUitKi Cyd*, to Dsu Signed:
•
•
1
100
90
80
70
UJ
5 60
£ 50LJ
Ld 40Q_
30
20
10
026
GFc
U)
"1 ^~S T" * • ^ —— * "Tl~ ' —— 9 f "'" '•" "T* rf**^* "TT~ • ^ Tf f^^ U II V ' -•- jr*^ mJOIN, SIZE DISTRIBUTIOIc c s c
0
• •- ^^L .Ic• N
;
i
:
Ns
:
:
s
N ~FLrcr~r PF"PnPT1 n — „ ^w_J B * X A —— * \-J 1 X. i
O GJ
--i ru•» HH
•K;s
<Js\,'s<SS<* .
100 13.0 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001GRRIN SIZE - mm
fc +3"0.0
LL
27
y. GRAVEL4.3
y. SAND35.0
X SILT37.3
y. CLAYZ3.4
PI
10
D850.457
Dee D500.0380
D300 . 0086
D150.0017
MflTERIfiL DESCRIPTION
• Sandy lean clay
Project No. : X0271Pro ject : El ec tro-Vo ice
• Locat ion : North face. Pel i e c lay source
Date: 3-21-96
HATES BB a B S ——
GROIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORTi — * ir s~\. a rf~*" ~v~ i — t — > ~r~ ~r •. *S~* •^~*->"\k. «/~» i e i -r~ n^.RIflLS TESTING CONSUL TfiNT!
D10
usesCL
Remarks :
85339
F i g . N o „ ;
Cc Cu
ftASHTO
APPENDIX 5
FIELD DENSITY TESTING RESULTS
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr & Hnhnr, 7402 Wnntr.hirc, Suite 1H)_________Lnnninn. Midiiunn 4H917 ( 317 ) f.27-1141
DATE JOB TITLE JOB NUMBER
"PROJECT" EN GIN e EH
-»-
GAUGE NO
-^ *IMSPECT-OR ROUTE NO. or
DETERMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
HEADING
MOIS-
TURE,
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
S
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY,
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM.
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCEFROM C
LEFT SIGHT
DEPTH3CLOWPtAN
ITEM
OFWORK
8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
at/•z" /y.c •ii
.3.
-*- JbL
/z" -7.
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bllumlnous)
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE*
DIP STICKREADING
(CU. ttj
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(01. IL)
DENSITY DETERMINATION
SOIL1*MOLD0
REMARKS:
WETSOtt,
g
WETSOIL
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr 4 Hubnr, 7M]2 WcnLnhi.ro, Suite 110_________Lnnoinn, Michinnn W)17 (S171 f,2',
JOB NUMBER GAUG6 NO.
PROJECT ENGINEER ROUTE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TESTREADING
TEST
0£PTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST3EAOIN
MO1S-
.TURE.PCF
MOtS-
TURE.
S
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATIONDISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT RIGHTPLAN;iuo
ITEM
OF
WORK
S 10 11 12 t3 14 15 16
t-z.N 1
I L"
it"14 IfCY£N
W?\
/ / 5 ,Y_ A/
/.n121 (.0 T.&
2 + 6 V6^1
TEST NO.OR MMTEMP.
MOIS-TURE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
DIP STICKHEADING
(cu. (t)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.fi)
DENSITY DETERMINATION
SOIL7*MOLD
0
MOI-D9
WETSOIL
WETSOILlfa«.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 S 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
<
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fiuhheck, Thompson, 1'arr A Huhnr, 7402 Wc^t. f ih irc?, Su i te 110Innning, H^rlmjfin W)M (517) fi27-l1A1
DATE JOB TITLE
INJZPECTOR
JOB NUMUEH
PROJECT ENGINEER
GAUGE NO
ROUTE NO. or STREET"
DETERMINATION Of- IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
HEADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
HEADING
MOIS-
TURE.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY,
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCEFflOMC
LEFT RIGHT
DEPTHJELOYVPLANilUOE WORK'
ITEM
OF
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MOI3-TUOE
DETEHMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
DIP STICKHEADING(cu-lt)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.lt)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONwe?
SOIL tMOLDMOLD
0WETSOIL
gWETSOILIba.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF1 8 10 CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
I UHt ANUNUCLEAR METHOD
Thompson, Ca r r & Huhcr, 7';02 WcnLnhire, Suite 110Micliinnn W)M ( 5 1 7 ? 27-1161
DATE JOB TITLE
INSPECTOR
JOB NUMBER
PROJECT ENGINEER *
GAUGE NO.
ROUTE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OMN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TESTDEPTH
DENSITYW6T
PCF
TEST
1EADIN
MOIS-.TURE.PCF
MOIS-TURE.
DRYDENSITY
PCF
MAX.DENSITY.
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTIONSTATION
DISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT RIGHT
DEPTH3GLOWPIAN
GRADE WORK'
ITEM
OF
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
. a r <CV J°T._\ * i l l t .
/V'.V
//.C
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSlT¥-f&Jls & Bituminous)
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE
OiP STICKREAOINa
(CU. ItJ
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu. ttj
DENSITY DETERMINATION
SOIL7*MOLD
9
MOLD
0WETSOIL
g
WETSOILIbx.
COMPACTEDSOIL W6T
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
NUCLEAR METHOD
DATE JOB TITLE
INSPECTOR
JOB NUMBED
PROJECT ENGINEER
GAUGE NO
ROUTE NO. or S T R E E T
DETERMINATION OF lN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DHY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
HEADING
MOIS-
.TURE.PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
*
(3RY
DENSITY
I'CF
MAX.
DENSITY.
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE IDEPTHIELOWPLANFROM E
LEFT fllOHT 3HAOE
ITEM
OF
ORK'
8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
a-7./ t&f -'f
3»*i C.
N
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
Mors-Tune
DIP STICKHEADING
(cu. It)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE
(cu. (L)
DENS in' DETERMINATION
sou.7*MOLD
B
"OLD9
werSOIL
g
WETSOILtb*.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 4 8 10 CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huhnr, 7602 Wc-iLnhire, Su i te 110Innainn, Hit:hinnn 'lilVI 7 ( 5 1 7 ) C i27-1141
DATE JOB TITLE
IfTSPECTOR
JOB NUMBER
/" ^7 ~?, -Jic~''' ~f~ C;PROJECT ENGINEER
GAUGE NO
ROUTE NO. or STREbl
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TESTREADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
1EADIN
MOtS-
.TURE,
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
S
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FROM E
LEFT RIGHT SHADE WORK
DEPTHJELOWPLAN
ITS.'.)
OF
8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
S.S
Kl. T It /3o.& /.<*» .*>
//Jf.s"
6 /V.z. / / / . e
(o" C.o
/_?.*?V
2V.DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
TEST NO.OB MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE
DIP STICKREADINQ
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLElcu.fl.)
DENSITY DETERMINATION
SOIL +MOLD
MOLD9
WETSOIL
9
WETson.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr A Huhnr, 7402 Wnst.r.n ire, Suite 110Lnnsinq. Mirhinmi 'iJl'JI? (517)
DATE JOB TITLE
INSPECTOR
JOB NUMBER
(~~~ *7 -^ ?» Ci"-? <C3PROJECT ENGINEER "-
GAUGE NO.
ROUTE NO. o< STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TESTREADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
HEADING
MOIS-
.TUflE.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
S
DRYDENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY,
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCEFROM E
LEFT
DEPTHJELOV<PLAN
HIQHT sflAOE WOFU
ITEfOF
8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
/V o
4* o
y* \ ay. c
c. /
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
TEST NO.Oft MIXTfiMP.
MOIS-TURE
DIP STICKREADING
(CV.ILJ
VOLUMEMOLD onSAMPLE(cu-IL)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONWET
SOIL +MOLD
9
MOLD WETSOIL
9
WETSOILtbs.
COMPACTEDSOIL W6T
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCFa 10 CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr & Hubnr, 74(12 Wnnfc:;hire, Suite 110________Lnnmnq, Hidiinnn 411917 (517J '"'•' ' ' " 1
DATE JOB TITLE JOB NUMBEH GAUGE NO.
INSPECTOR PROJECt ENGINEER noU TE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
HEADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WETPCF
TEST1EAOIN
MOIS-
.TURE.
PCF
MOIS-TURE.
DRYDENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCEt
LEFT RICH
DEPTH3ELOWPLAN
ITEM
OF
WORK
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
/z . //J/.o ///•*?
/ee.s /C.o .s/VA.S
Z' 1
OETEflMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Blhimlnouj)
TEST NO-on MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURK
O'P STICKREADING(at ft)
VOtUMEMOtD OHSAMPLE(eu-rt.)
DENSITY DETEBMINATION
soil1*MOLD
a
MO«-O0
WETSOIL
9
werson.tto.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
NUCLEAR METHOD
Kishbeck, Thompson, Carr A Huhnr, 7402 Wcst.nhire t Suite 110Lnnninq, Minhinnii <WJ17 f S l ? )
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
HEADING]
MOIS-
TURE.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY.
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT
DEPTHPEUOW
PLANRIGHT KJRADE
ITEM
OF
WORK
10 11 12 13 t4 15 16
K /:fjr
/o"
l±LV" g-7.7-
^
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE
DIP STICKREADING
(eo.lL)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu. IL)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONWET
SOIL *MOLDn
MOLD0
WETSOIL
WETSOILtbi.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 4 8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fiiibcck. Thompson, Carr & Hubcr, 7402 Westnhire, Suite 110/y " c^ c~ LnnGinq, Mjrrliinnn 40917 (517£ «2 7 rlt41___ ..._,_. _________ ... ———————————————
DATE JOB TITLE
\— V cT.c. ^ C^-j-^' Vr-t\:il'IJWMECTOH
joa NUMBERV^ "^ \S"i rr
"75~AO^ \^>
5~?-<r-S
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITY
TEST NO.
I1
^
C^
'l
* i6-*
12
<
' X '
>
WET DENSITY
TEST
READING
3
^fc-vr
N ^
r -r
x r
TEST
DEPTH
4
. ~y f
!<=>"
s~^"
fJA-
If"
/C?"
^>-
C"
y>i
DENStTT
WET
PC?
5
/^o
/^7,^
/2S^
/Z^ -c
,30 _«./v.v'3/.C
^.czc.c
MOISTURE
TEST
HEADING
6
MOIS-
TURE,
PCF
7
tff.O
(fi.^
g^
/?.?
/^.S
*f.fft/
^r*T
/cs
Mors-TURE.
8
1C,
tt-Y/f ,/^.«t1C.
/V2
(u -
,</.!rr-*^r /
DRY DENSITYDRY
DENSITY
PCF
9
i ^^ .
//oi(L
/ /<±3,Ci
/ /V c^
//3.c
//V.?
^v
^ c
//<=./
MAX.
DENSITY.
PCf
10
/ZS"",S"
\ ^
ft?
•Lrs-
OF COM-
PACTION
11
**1 "2-
BS.
^S,\
^7-i^a.y
?-T
?/ V
=r( S.
SS.=7
S7.C,
LOCATION OF TEST
STATIC M
12
"e/ssU
ev2r-
DISTANCE
FROUC
LEFT
13mcwr
14
BELOW
stuoe15
te
ITE.M
OF
WORK
1fi
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)TEST wxonuixTEMP.
1
————
uots-Tims
2
REMARKS:/
DIP STICKREADING
3
i ^rVrlx \
' " Cr \
VO1.UM6uotoonSAUPUi
4
———— ———
j£S-.~^
DENSITY DETERMINATIONSrmr
t MOLD WET WETSOLD 9 son- SOIL
a n Ttn,
s a 7 a
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
S 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY
OPEHATfNG
MOISTURE
STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS M« DESIGN PCF
v V "*7 *^ r~
i.r - Ni /VC e ^
= 5 -^
^S""
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr i Htjhci-, 7402 Hcat.Thire, Suite 110/ ^-* ' I -._}
DATE
iwpeeTii&i
JOB T/TU£
V ^ ; ^ ^ ^ — —
JOB NUMHEfl
PROJEcif EMGiWfe6R ' RdUrte NO. « STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYT6ST NO WET DENSITY M013TUH6 DRV DENSITY LOCATION OP TEST
TE3TREAOINd
TESTDEPTH
DSN3ITY
W6TTC3T
lEADfNC
MOI3-.rufte
PCF
Mors-TUHE.
I3HY
osNsrrvI'CF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PEHCEMTOF COM-PACTION
STATION
OfSrANCCFROMC
terr
oe»mtas.o^
FLANRIOHT SfMOE WORK
OF
10 11 12 13 14 18
AS.Z i "73,. S.
C, // r. V
\
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr A Hubcr, 7^02 Wcstrvhire, Su i te 110
DAT*
? A^rAc:iHSHicrbfl
JQS TJfLE
tA^^^V ________
JOB NUM8EB
ST^^, ^^^.
OAUOE NO.
Tuiayfe NO. w sVheer —————————
DETERM1NATIOM OF IN-PUAC£ DENSITY
TEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRV DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
REAOtNaTEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WETTEST
MOIS-TURE.
PCF
wora-TUHE.
anyDENSITY
PCF
WAX-
DENSITY,
PCF
PCHCCNT
OFCOM-
PACTIOMSTATK3M
OtSTANCEFROMC
urr FttOMT SBAOt WORK
DEPTHCLOfUM
OF
10 13 H 16
V
>c=xc:
TBBTMO.OHUOCTEUP.
uots-TURK
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM OENStTY {Softs & Bituminous)
DtPSTTCKREAOINQ
VOLUMEMOLD OffSAMPLE|cu.fL)
De*STTT DETERMINATIONwcrson.*MOLD8_
MOLD WCTSOU.
D
WiTson.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAX
1 5 9 10 CHAflT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
HTTUMINOUS MK DESIGN PCF
REMARKS;
——y •-' - ^^* ^-*^—^>|^-^--^ J I.
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMSNATNUCLEAH METHOD
Finhheck, Thompson, Carr i Huhor, 7402 Wcnr.:;hirn, Suite 110Lnn.nj_nr|. Mirli_u}fm 4f)91 7 ( 3 ) 7 ) /-,27-IUl
DATE
B/, /5CJ08 TITLE
IMSPBCTOR ^
JOB NUMBER
/— ^ -2i3>lCi'T2: C^>PROJECT ENGINEER
GAUGE NO.
3 _._ .ROUTE NO Of STREET
DETERMINATION Of: IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
^EADIN
MOIS-
TURE.
PCf
MOIS-TURE.
S
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTIONSTATION
DISTANCEFRQME
LEFT RIGHT
DEPTHI9ELOW
PLANSHADE
S 10 11 12 13 14 15
/o" //c:
/3o.V.
.o
V
M/
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM PENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MO15-TTJRE*
DIP STrCKREADING(en. rt)
VOLUMEMOLD onSAMPLEfCU. (L)
DENSITY DETERMINATION
SOlTfMOLD
9
WETSOIL
gWETSOILIbi.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
NUCLEAR METHOD
DATE
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Hubcr,Longing, HLnliinnn 4<)'J17_
7HQ2 Wcnlnhire,(317) f,27-1141
Suite 1 1 [J
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OP TEST
TESTREADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TESTMOIS-
TURE.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
*
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FROM
LEFT RICH
3ELOPtAN
QRAO
ITEM
OF
WORK
a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
. . V "7V
/z.
PT"
TEST NO.OH MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & Bituminous)
DIP STICKREADING(CU.IL)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.fLI
DENSITY DETERMINATION
SOIL*MOLD
9
MOLDff
WETSOIL
9
WETson.Hn.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 3 8 9 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MfX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
C;NUCLEAR METHOD
DATE JOB TITLE
F'ishbeck, Ihompson, Car r A Mnhc:r, 7402 WerUnMm:, Suih> 1 HI
PROJECT ENGINEER ROUTE NO. or STHEbl
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYT6ST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY tOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
W6T
PCF
TEST
HEADING
MOIS-
.TURE.
PC*
MOIS-
TURE.
S
DRYDENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT RlOHf
DEPTH1ELOW7LAN
3RAO!
a £1 10 11 12 13 14 15
S' ;/*/.*?
/ /V. =_£
//. a
/z
v/Cc
/O //V. o 70.
V.o
TEST NO.on MIXTEMP.
1
MOIS-TUH6
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
DIP STICKREADING(CU.fl)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CU.IL)
DENSITY DGTEHMINATION,g,V»MOLD
0
MOIDQ
WETSOIL
9
WETSOILIts.
8
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF10 CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
- C
^. A^^^
s±L2-V^-i.^—bd==^
NUCLEAR METHOD
__ ^_ Fishbeck,
DATE JOB TITLE
INSPECTOR V
ThompsonLnnninq ,
Carr 4 Huhor,MichUinn 4H91 7
JOB NUMBER
7402 Wentnhirc, Su i te 110(517 ) C.27-1141
^cs>0^PROJECT ENGINEER
GAUGE NO
ROUTE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE OHY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TESTREADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST1 HAD IN
MOIS-
TUR6,
PCF
MOIS- DRYDENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY,
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT HIQHT QHAOE WORK
DEPTH3ELOWPLAN
ITEM
OF
10 11 t2 13 14 15 16
iica.l
lo
If.y v /
//.o
//.I) T/
a./
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP,
MOIS-TURE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & BHumlnous)
DIP STICKREADING
(cu. ILJ
VOLUMEMOID ORSAMPLE
(cu. It)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONWET
SOIL*MOLD
aMOLD
BWETSOIL.
9
WETSOU
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXOENSITY
PCF
1 9 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATiNUCLEAR METHOD
-it. ' f^t-n^. f
DATE '
s/? /^ cIN/SPECJOR
^>-v Vez-A^. .
Fishbeck,
JOB TITLE
r
ThompsonLnnainn,
— S^.
, Carr & Huhnr, 7402 WeMichinrm 40V17 ( 5 1 7 )
JOB NUMBER
PROJECT EINGINE6R
nt.nhirc, Suite 110f,27-11i»1
..
GAUGE NO.
ROUTE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OF JN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTUHE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
1EAO1N
MOIS-
.TURE,
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
DRYDENSITY
FCF
MAX.
DENSITY.
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATIONDISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT
ITEM
OF
RIGHT QRAOE WORK
DEPTH3ELOWPLAN
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
\o" HfC.f
/ /*?.&
Sw*"
/ll.f t f
TEST NO.on MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TUHE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
DIP STICKREADING
{CU.ILJ
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.f(.)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONWET
SOIL *MOLD
9
MOLDS
WETSOIL
9
WETSOILIbs.
COMPACTEDSOIL W6T
PCT
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 8 9 10 CHAHT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
g .
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Hufocr, 7402 Hcstr.hire, Suite 110Lnnninq, Mirhinnn 4H917 (517) /J27-11AL .-.
OAre TJOQ TITL£S /,< — &=j <Z* \ ^*-- \s c~ ^> er j V^*-
^T^^ ^ - X-
JOB NUMSEfl u«uuc >MVJ
I'HOJtCI ENGINEER ROUTE NO. ot STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PUACE DENSITYTE3T NO. WET MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
REAOINQTEST
DEPTHWgT
TEST
HEADIN
MOIS-
TURE.
PCF
MOIS-
TUflE.
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
fAM.
DENS1TY.
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FPQUC
LEFT RIGHT SRAOe WORK
OF
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
OJ£ W£JL
/ J i -
ClV
V -.
/Z_.J / /V.V
/VJ.
c"
TfgTtiaOH MIXTEMP,
uots-Tims*
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Sofia & Bltuoilnoiis)otpsncxRCAOIHQ
(CU. RJ
VOUMffiUOLDpfl
DENSITYWETSOIL
»trCOR.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXOB4SITY
10 CHAflT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
15itj BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
HEMAflKS:
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Huhnr 7402 Wc3tr»hiL-«, Suite(517) fi27-UM.
DATE
" -i V. j-A1^*5-
JOB riTLt
vA^^^-V
JOa NUMBERr— — i— -^ •» * i, — -T ..^ ^T A 3. c i2- o
'S>v*H . ts v, _
OAUOE ^4O.
DETEHMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO, W6T DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WETTEST
MOIS-
TURE.
PCF
MOIS-TURE.
13 RYDENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY,
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE [DEPTH9S.OWPIAN
FROMCmOMT 3RAOe WOHK
ITEM
OF
10 11 13 14 15
/ Z ' 1
//v.g.
. v
//c . -72-1
TEST NO.OftUIXT1WP.
MOIS-TURE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & Bilarohous)
HEAD WOVOLUME
SAMPLE(can.)
DENSITY DETEflMINATtON-WET"SOIL *MOU>
fl _
MOLD9
WETSOU.
WETSOU.On.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCFMAX
DENSITYPCf
1 8 Q 10 CHAflT STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BlTUMtNOUS MfX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fichbeck, Thompson, Carr & Hiibcr, 74G2 Wcstnhire, Suite 110Una ing. Mirhignn 4H.917 ._C.517J r.2?-11M
1 JOB NUMBEfl3Efl
3>^><^ic^GNGIMEEH
* . -^v.^ .__ .
OAUQE NO.
HOUTE NO. W STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TESTREADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST1EAOIKC
MOIS-
.Turte.PCF
MOIS-TUBE.
DRYDENSITY
PCf
MAX.
DENStTY.
PCF
P£flCENT
OF COM-PACTION
STATION
DISTANCEFRQMC
LEFT
BSUOWPWM
mcur bruodwORK
ITEMOF
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19
fo" J£S . a
IHL IIC..1
/O. o
rry
TEST Maon urnTEMP.
lion-Turte*
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY <Solto & B»nmlmn»>OU> STICKBEAOIHO
VOLUMEUOLOOflSAMPLE(Cttfl)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONWETson. *•
MOLDWETSOIL.
9
WETSOILto.
COMPACTED9DIL WCT
PCF
MAXDQ43ITY
PCf
10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fiijhbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Hnhor, 7402 Wo^t.-.him, Suite 110Lnnpinq, Hirlntjrui Jj(19jJ ( 5 1 7 )
DATE
O /s /<- f£5 /C_ /S (*.
JOB TITLE
tNSPE<TTOR \
i\c_^^-, f-\-<aJi .rvi r T
JOB NUMBER
PROJECT ENGINEER ^
'~v^ -^ ^^_ r*N. i c*^ f^\ ^^v * > ^— * _
GAUGE NO.
ROUTE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
W6T
PCF
TEST
1EAOIN
MOIS-
.TURE.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
H
DRYDENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENTOF COM-
PACTION
STATIONDISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT RIOHT
DEPTH9ELOWPLANQiuoe,
ITEMOF
WORK
7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
UA *7V.o»3?
/<=> o.i
//.s
TEST NO.on MIXTEMP.
MOIS-fURE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)Or? STICKnEADINQ
{CU.ILJ
VOLUMEMOLD OflSAMPLE(calt)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONWET
SOIL tMOLD
0
MOLD WETSOIL
g
WETSOILtb*.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCFt 8 10 CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS;
NUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbcck, Thompson, Carr A Hubor, 7602 Wcat.thire, Suite 110• _ _ . _ _ u. _i.; —— /.iiniT / n 1 "7 1 f.'}^ _11 /i1
Sr
JOB NUMBER
PROJECT gNGINggft x
_ —————— ~-j — ..i.id ..-~- ————————— -~— — -
OAUQE NO-
ROUTE NO. w STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITY
TEST NO WCT oeNsrrv MOISTURE DRY LOCATION OF TEST
TE3T TE5TT
OEPTHWET
POP
TESTMOI3-
.TUR6.
PCF
Mors-TUHE.
*
DHY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FHOME
LEFT
DEPTH3S.OW1FLAM
mOHT SftAOe WORK
ITEM
OF
s 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
0-3 41£
TEST HaonuncTEUP.
TWW
DETEflMINATION OF MAXJHUM DENSITY (Sotb & BHmafnous)OU» STICKREADMO
(CDLOJ
VOLUMEUOLDOttSAUPU3(cu-ft.)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONET
SOIL*MOLD
MOLDp
WETSOIL.
9
WETSOILtos,
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
fCf1 4 3 9 10 CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
\^
NUCLEAR METHOD
FishbecU, Thompson, Carr A Huhur, 7602 Wcstntiire, Suite 110Lnnning. Mirhignn (1917 (517). fiZ7-1iqi
DETERMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO. W6T DGNSJTY MOISTURE DRY OBESITY LOCATION OF TEST
TESTflEADINd
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TESTlEAOfNG
MOIS-
TURE,
PCF
MOtS- DRV
PCf
MAX.
DENSITY
PCf
PERCENT
OFCOM-PACTIOM
STATION0 STANCE
FROMC
DEPTH38.CWPIAN
maur SRAOE ft-ORK
ITEM
or
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
32.a./ il.
TEST «xon tuxTEMP,
TUHE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bilumfnous)
WP3T1CKPETAOOJa
(OtftJ
VOLUMEUOLDOffSAMPLE(ai. H»
tIETERMJNAnONWEson. *
MOLD9
MOLD„WETsou.
0
WETson.tta.
COMPACTEDson. WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF4 a 9 10 CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERAriNG STAWOAflDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERIVIINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Hubor, 7402 Wcritnhire, Sui te 11Q_______Lnnairiq, Midiinnn 4(1917 (317 ) f .ZT - ITM
DATE JOB TITL£ JOB NUMBER
3 y//INPECTOR PROJECT ENGINEER BUUIE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TESTREADING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WETPCF
TEST
1EAOIN
MOIS-
TURE.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
DHY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATIONDISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT
ITEMOF
RIGHT QRAOE WORK
DEPTH3ELOWPtAN
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
s—T Q/.V7V /
&*L \.J
~Oi /V-f
lo*
V
TEST NOOR MIXTEMP.
DETEHMtNATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Softs & Bituminous)
MOIS-TURE
DIP STICKREAOIHO
(CU.lt)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(cu.fL)
DENSITY DETERMINATIONWET
2JIL *OLDO
MOLD9
WETSOIL
g
WETSOtLK>».
COMPACTIDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
STURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
P'ishbeck, Thompson, Cnrr i Huhcr, 7402 Went.;;ti ire, Sui te 110Lnnainn. Mich igrin 4H91 7 ( 5 1 7 ) C.Z7-T * '•"
DATE JOB TITLE
If^PECJTORr-^^W
2_KV"
JOB NUMBER
f-~~C7 ^>J*> C "?" C^>PROJECT ENGINEER
GAUGE NO.
ROUTE NO. or S T R E E T
DETERMINATION OF 1N-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
HEADING
MOIS-TURE.PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
S
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY.
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT
DEPTHJ6LOWPLAN
RIGHT RAOE WORK
ITEM
OF
8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
IT. a,//CD'' il^L
J / Z . Z V
/Z ^3g.s
to"
//o", V
/31.C.
-76'. o
//.s //s.vDETEHMtNATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils ft Bituminous)
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE
DrP STICKREADING
{CU.H.)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CO. «,]
DENSITY [JETERMINATIONMOLD
VWETSOIL
gWETSOILItJJ.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
S 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
_S—-\
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huhnr, 7402 Wcnt.ntiire, Suite 110Lnnainci, Mlchictnn 40917 (517) f>27-1U1
DATE
o / / rJOB TITLE
INSPECTOR \y^> \ \» ts- A r- -, * '• T™
JOB NUM6EH
PROJECT ENGINEER *
GAUGE NO
ROUTE NO. or STREET
DETERMINATION OF IN-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
3EAOIN
MOIS-
.TURE.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM.
FACTION
STATIONDISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT
DEPTH1ELOWPt-AN
ftlOHT SHADE WORK
ITEM
OF
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
10"
NItFt
/o
a. 2.lo
tTEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE*
DETERMtNATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY {Soils & Bituminous)
DIP STICKREAOINO
<cu. IL)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CU.IL)
DENSITY DETERMINATION
OMT*ioLD
g
MOLDa
WETSOIL
g
WET5On-ttn.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
•zX
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr 4 Huhnr,Lnnairiq, J-Ucliignfi 4fl9l7__
7402 Wcnt-.nhire, Suite 110(517) f.27-1161
DATE
S /ICs /S C
JOB TITLE
INSPECTOR ^
JOB NUMBER
PROJECT ENGINEER "*
OAUOE NO..-1
ROUTE NO. of STREET
DETERMINATION OF fN-PLACE DENSITY *•TEST NO. WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST
READ IN'
MOIS-
.TUHe.
PCF
MOIS-
TURE.
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
MAX.
DENSITY.
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATION
DISTANCEFROM C
LEFT
DEPTH9B.0WPLAN
niQHT SHAOE
ITElf
WORK
10 11 12 13 14 15 1 D.
/v.st
//.o
IZ. fe
to / / .<=>
/y.l . V V
/e 13. 1 '(
n.t ts"TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
MOIS-TURE
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils & Bituminous)
DIP STICKREADING(CU.IL)
VOLUMEMOLD ORSAMPLE(CU.ILJ
OENS1TT DETERMINATION
SOIt *MOtO
V
MOLDV
W6TSOU.
9
WETSOILIbs.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCF
1 8 10 CHART STANDARDSDENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
MOISTURE AND DENSITY DETERMINATIONNUCLEAR METHOD
Fi-shbeck, Thompson, Carr & Hubnr, 7402 Wcntnhirc, Suite 110______________Lnnninq. Mirliinnn MVJM (517)
DATE
sA^/2iN^PECfOR
JOB TITLE
C
JOB GAUGE NO.
PROJECT ENGINEER -*£-
DETERMINATION OF~JN^-PLACE DENSITYTEST NO WET DENSITY MOISTURE DRY DENSITY LOCATION OF TEST
TEST
READING
TEST
DEPTH
DENSITY
WET
PCF
TEST1EADIN
MOIS-
.TUHE.
PCF
MOIS-TURE.
S
DRY
DENSITY
PCF
WAX.
DENSITY,
PCF
PERCENT
OF COM-
PACTION
STATIONDISTANCE
FROM C
LEFT
DEPTH1ELOWPLAN
flIQHT SRAOE WORK
ITEM
OF
3 10 11 12 13 14 t5 16
JZ.IK
C_
V
TEST NO.OR MIXTEMP.
DETERMINATION OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (Soils 4 Bllumlnous)
MOIS-TURE
Orp STICKRCAOINa
(CU.ILJ
VOtUMEMOLD OHSAMPLEICU.ILJ
DENSITY DETERMINATION
soil1*MOLD
9
M°»-D0
WETSOII-
gWETSOIL.
COMPACTEDSOIL WET
PCF
MAXDENSITY
PCFto CHART STANDARDS
DENSITY MOISTURE
OPERATING STANDARDS
BITUMINOUS MIX DESIGN PCF
REMARKS:
APPENDIX 6EXCAVATION LIMITS LETTER
fishbeck, thornpson, carr & huberengineers • scientists • architects
June 4, 1996Project No. F93307Q
Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E. (HSRW-6J)Remedial Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V77 West JacksonChicago, IL 60606
Re: Electro-Voice, Inc. • Lagoon Soils RemediationComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act SiteBuchanan, Michigan
Dear Ms. Chow:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on May 31,1 996, concerning the soil excavation in thenorthwest area of the site.
T7ie limits of contamination indicated on the construction drawings are located too far to the west (at gridnodes 76, 78, and 80). Figure 2-4 of the Additional Studies Report (FTC&H, April 1995) shows the limitof contamination along grid nodes 1, 4, and 7. The design drawings limit was based on slope requirements;however, the distance provided is overly conservative. The limit of excavation in this area will be movedeast, closer to the grid nodes 1, 4, and 7. This move will not compromise safety or regulatoryrequirements. The exact location of the excavation limit will be based on field conditions and thecontractors' construction methods.
Please call our offices if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC.
James A. Susan, P.E.
Up
cc: Mr. Ronald M. Graham - Mark IV Audio of North America, Inc.Mr. Rob Franks -MDEQMr. Seth Bryson - CH2M HillMr. Kirn Veiling - Michigan Earthworks, Inc.Mr. Kenneth G. Wiley, C.P.G. - FTC&HMr. David L. Conklin, P.E. - FTC&H
J:\DOC93\C93307Q\LTCHOWI JAS
APPENDIX 7SURVEY DATA
Station PointNumber
N3+96.E5+2SE4+84E4-MCE3+96E3+52E3+08
N3+52.E2+64E3+08E3+52E3+96E4*40E4+84E5+28N3+08,E5+28E4+84E4+40E3+96E3+52E3+08E2+64N2+64.E2+64E3+08E3+52E3+96E4+40E4+84E5+28•J2+20 E5+28E4-*-8<»E4+4QE3+96E3+52E3+08E2+64N1+76.E2+64E3+08E3+52E3+96E4-r40E4+84E5+28
E4+-84E4+4GE3+9SE3+52E3*D8
NO+08.E3+52
Subgrade elevas of 7/7/96
719.34714.19712.43708.58708.17
707
708.17711.13715.52718.89721.08722.84724.15724.66723.94722.27720.41718.53713.2709
709.88715.88719.93721.5723.53724.59
725.24723.96722.46720.88717.76
711712.36718.88722.59723.51724.64725.62
727.54726.13725.24722.81714.49
717.86
top of clay elevas of 8/1 2/96
721 .32716.99715.31714.01712.7
71 1 .02
710.59714.17718.32721.37723.75725.3
726.53727,42726.77725.4723.21720.84716.38711.06711.67718.54722.51724.3726.12727.37
728.05727.15725.772374720.56712.5713.64721 .42725.3
727.07728.01728.88
730.25729.25727.77724.57717.04
720.33
ELbCT
Plan clay grades
722.34717.19715.43711.58711.17
710
711.17714.13718.52721.89724.08725.84727.15727.66726.94725.27723.41721.53716.2712
712.88718.88722.93724.5726.53727.59
728.24726.96725.46723.88720.76
714715.36721.88725.59726.51727.64728.62
730.54729.13728.24725.81717.49
720.86
RO-VO1CE Lf
clay depthasof8\12\96
1.982.802.885.434.534.02
2.423.042.802.482.672.462.382.762.833.132.802.313.182.081.792.662.582.802.592.78
2.813.193.242.862.801.501.282.542.713.563.373.26
2.713.122.531.762.55
2.47
KaOON S<
e/f
1.020.2
0.12-2.43-1.53-1.02
0.58-0.040.2
0.520.330.540.620.240.17-0.130.20.69-0.180.921.210.340.420.2
0.410.22
0.19-0.19-0.240.140.21.5
1.720.460.29-0.56-0.37-0.26
0.29-0.120.471.240.45
0.53
3ILS REMEDIA
REMARKS
Filled to markFilled to markFilled to mark
left highleft highleft high
Filled to markleft high
Filled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to mark
left highFilled to markFilled to mark
left highFiiled to markFilled to markFilled to markFiiled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to mark
Filled to markleft highleft high
Filled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to markFilled to mark
left highleft highleft high
Filled to markleft high
****
Filled to mark
„
nowFinal
clay grd
722.34717.19715.43714.01712.7711.02
711.17714.17718.52721.89724.08725.84727.15727.66726.94725.4723.41721.53716.38
712712.88718.88722.93724.5726.53727.59
728.24727.157257723.8872076
714715.36721.88725.59727.07728.01728.88
730.54729.25728.24725.81717.49
720.86
Adjusted finalGrades
724.67719.52717.76716.34715.03713.35
713.50716.50720.85724.22726.41728.17729.48729.99729.27727.73725.74723.86718.71714.33715.21721.21725.26726.83728.86729.92
730.57729.48728.03726.21723.09716.33717.69724.21727.92729.40730.34731.21
732.87731.58730.57728.14719.82
723.19
Elev asof 8/20/96
723.58720.21718.06716.05714.59712.89
712.41717.30720.78724.01726.14727.79729.07730.21729.26727.68725.93723.61719.01713.46714.37720.94725.30727.51728.56730.04730.54
730.64729.40728.30726.93722.81714.97715.11723.86727.53729.28730.57731.49
732.40731.50729.88726.66719.11
722.45
e/ffrom clay plan
-1.24-3.02-2.63-4.47-3.42-2.89
-1.24-3.17-2.26-2.12-2.06-1.95-1.92-2.55-2.32-2.41-2.52-2.08-2.81-1.46-1.49-2.06-2.37-3.01-2.03-2.45
-2.40-2.44-2.84-3.05-2.05-0.970.25
-1.98-1.94-2.77-2.93-2.87
-1.86-2.37-1.64-0.85-1.62
-1.59
c/f fromadj. final
1.10-0.69-0.300.290.450.46
1.10-0.790.070.210.280.380.42
-0.210.020.05
-0.190.26
-0.300.870.840.27
-0.03-0.670.31
-0.12
-0.070.09
-0.26-0.710.281.362.580.350.390.13
-0.22-0.27
0.470.080.691.490.71
0.74
REMARKS
fccfff
fcfffffcffcfcfffccfc
cfccffffffcc
fffff
f
FinalVerificationSurvey11/31/96
724.25720
717.76716.55
714.6712.61
712.5716.7
720.62723.8
725.85727.68728.82729.94729. 15
713.32
716.11
732.4
729. 58
722.5
page 1
SUMMARY OF SURVEYING FOR
Station PointNumber
E3+96E 4-i-40E4+83E5+23N 0+4 4, E 5+ 28E4+84E4+40E3+96
Subgrade efev top of clay eievas of 7/7/96 as of 8/1 2/96
724.26 726.65728.63 729.96
731.82
ELECTRO-VOICE LAGOON SC
Plan clay grades clay depth c/fasof8\12\96
727.26 2.39 0.61731.63 1.33 1.67
ILS REMEDIATION
REMARKS Finalclay grd
727.26731 .63
**
Adjusted final Elev as c/fGrades of 8/20/96 from clay plan
729.59 729.57 -2.31733.96 732.04 -0.41
730.51725.68
FinalVerification
c/ffrom REMARKS Surveyadj. final 11/31/96
0.02 f1.93 f
730.726.
DENOTES CLAY WAS VERIFIED BY HAND AT THESE LOCATIONS TO BE 3' OR MORE
page 2
APPENDIX 8MEETING MINUTES
PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING AGENDA
Project: Electro-Voice, Inc. Lagoon Soils RemediationProject No.: F93307ID
Attendance:
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
1. General introductions and sign-in of attendees.
2. Summary of the work (Section 01010).
DescriptionRemedial Action Work Plan
3. Chain-of-Command
Owner: FTC&H/Electro-Voice, Inc.Engineer: FTC&HContractor: Michigan Earthworks, Inc.
4. Occupancy and operational requirements
Contractors use of premises
5. Preliminary Schedules
6. Staking and Inspection Services (01012)
7. Application for Payment (01027)
Date for monthly submittal:Cash Allowances (01021)
8. Contract Modification Procedures (01035)
BulletinField OrderWork Change DirectiveChange Order
9. Regulator)- Requirements (01060)
10. Contaminated Soil and Groundwater Procedures (01103)
11. Progress Meetings (01200)
12. Subrnitials (01300)
Shop Drawings, Literature: Engineer reuiin.s four copies.
Preconstruction Meeting AgendaPage 2
13. Testing Services (01400)
14. Construction Facilities & Temporary Controls (01500)
15. Contract Close-Out (01700)
16. Project Record Drawings (01720)
17. Liquidated Damages
18. Electro-Voice, Inc.'s Comments
19. Contractor's Comments
20. Regulatory Agency Comments
M E E T I N GM I N U T E S
IF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS THOUGHTTO BE INACCURATE OR INCORRECT, PLEASE CONTACT
WRITER AT ONCE FOR RESOLUTION,
Project: Electro-Voice Lagoon Soils Remediation Meeting Date: June 6, 1996
Project No.: F93307Q Meeting Place: Electro-Voice Plant
Subject: Progress Meeting No. 1 Meeting Time: 1:30 p.m.
Notes Prepared By: James A. Susan Adjournment Time: 2:30 p.m.
Attending: Mr. Ronald Graham - Mark IV IndustriesMr. Kim Velting - Michigan EarthworksMs. Eugenia Chow - U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyMr. James A. Susan, P.E. - FTC&HMr. David L. Conklin, P.E. - FTC&H
1. Project is on schedule.
2. Backfill will be delayed by one week, but should not affect the overall project schedule.
3. Excavation should be completed by June 14, 1996.
4. Clay will be obtained from the Urington pit, north of Buchanan. Sampling will be scheduled withinthe next several days. Drainage layer soil will also come from the Urington pit. The drainage layersamples will be collected at the same time.
5. Testing results will be sent to the U.S. EPA when received.
6. Backfilling could begin around June 18, 1996. The City of Buchanan has been notified that trucks willbe hauling material to the site.
lip
J:\DOC93\C93307Q\MIEV6696JAS
M E E T I N G -M I N U T E S
IF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS THOUGHTTO BE INACCURATE OR INCORRECT, PLEASE CONTACT
WRITER AT ONCE FOR RESOLUTION.
Project: Electro-Voice Lagoon Soils Remediation Meeting Date: June 27, 1996
Project No.: F93307Q Meeting Place: Electro-Voice ConstructionTrailer
Subject: Progress Meeting No. 2 Meeting Time: 11 a.m.
Notes Prepared By: James A. Susan Adjournment Time: 12 noon
Attending: Mr, Ronald Graham - Mark IV IndustriesMr. Kim Velting - Michigan EarthworksMs. Eugenia Chow - U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyMr. Rob Hunt - Michigan Department of Environmental QualityMr. Jason Kraus - CH2M HillMr. James A. Susan, P.E. - FTC&HMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&H
1. A revised construction schedule was distributed and discussed.
2. No problems have been identified. Rain has slowed construction.
3. Groundwater at the site is approximately 2 feet higher than when measured during the design.
4. Excavation should be completed by next week. Backfilling will begin next week also.
5. In-place density testing on the placed soil is as specified,
tc
J:\DOC93\C93307Q\PMTG6-27.JAS
V I E B U N GM IN U T E S
IF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS THOUGHTTO BE INACCURATE OR INCORRECT, PLEASE CONTACT
WRITER AT ONCE FOR RESOLUTION.
Project: Electro-Voice Lagoon Soils Remediation Meeting Date: July 18, 1996
Project No.: F93307Q Meeting Place: Electro-Voice Offices
Subject: Progress Meeting No. 3 Meeting Time: 11 a.m.
Notes Prepared By: James A. Susan Adjournment Time: 12 noon
Attending: Mr. Steven Slot - Michigan EarthworksMs. Eugenia Chow - U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyMr. Rob Franks - Michigan Department of Environmental QualityMr. Jason Kraus - CHjM HillMr. James A. Susan, P.E. - FTC&HMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&H
1. Clay is being placed on the side slopes before beginning the next lift.
2. It is anticipated that clay placement will be completed by next week.
3. Surveyors will be scheduled after the third lift iis completed.
4. A shelby tube sample will be collected after the third lift is completed.
5. The private properties bordering the deep excavation area must be restored to their originalelevation. This may require changing the contouring from that shown on the drawings.
6. The drainage layer must be MDOT Type n material.
7. MW9S was hit by a sand truck. The well will be repaired once the cap construction is complete,
psk
cc: AttendeesMr. R. Graham - Mark IV Industries
J:\DOC93\C93307Q\PMTG7-18.JAS
FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC.6090 East Fulton, P.O. Box 211 - Ads. MI 49301 - (616) 676-2666
7'1O'> WV-vMhfn- TVivr ^ i p l r - 1 m . I . , , , - , , • ,* M» 4HO 1 7 - /< r -n c-n i ' >
APPENDIX 9PREFINAL AND FINAL INSPECTION REPORTS
*
-•.. A /7' V
fishbeck, thompson, carr & huberengineers * scientists • architects
September 10, 1996Project No. F93307Q
Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E. (SR-6J)Remedial Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V77 West Jackson BoulevardChicago, IL 60604-3590
Re: Electro-Voice Superfund SiteLagoon Soils Remediation, Prefinal Inspection Report
Dear Ms. Chow:
On August 29, 1996, the Prefinal Inspection was held for the Lagoon Soils Remediation Project. Thefollowing persons were in attendance:
Ms. Eugenia Chow - U.S. EPAMr. Rob Franks - MDEQMs. Erin Potts - CH2M HillMr. Ron Graham - Electro-VoiceMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&HMr. David Conklin - FTC&HMr. James Susan - FTC&H
The materials testing results for the latest clay and sand samples were reviewed and a site walkover wasconducted. The following items require further attention:
1. The grain size analysis for the sand sample collected on August 14, 1996, was missing from thematerials testing report.
2. The fence has not been completed.
3. Reinstallation of monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, and MW-16.
The grain size analysis for the sand sample has been received by the testing company. All of the latest testresults are included in the site monthly report for August 1996. It is anticipated that the fence will becompleted during the week ending September 6, 1996.
Once the fence is compete, the final inspection will be conducted.
The monitoring wells will be reinstalled at the same time soil samples are collected under the Phase IIRemedial Action Work Plan from the area of the former dry well.
Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E.Page 2September 10, 1996
Please call our office if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC.
James A. Susan, P.E.
net
cc: Mr. Rob Franks - MDEQMr. Seth Bryson - CH2M HillMs. Erin Potts - CH2M HillMr. Ronald M. Graham - Electro-Voice, Inc.Mr. Kenneth G. Wiley, C.P.G. - FTC&HMr. David Conklin, P.E. - FTC&HMr. Blake Meinert - FTC&H
;:\DOC93\C93307QALTCHOW2JAS
fishbeck, thompson, carr& hubeiengineers • scientists * architects
r u
October 17, 1996Project No. F93307Q
Ms. Eugenia Chow, P.E. (SR^SJ)Remedial Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V77 West Jackson BoulevardChicago, IL 60604-3590
Re: Electro-Voice Superfund SiteLagoon Soils Remediation, Final Inspection Report
Dear Ms. Chow:
On September 24, 1996, you conducted the Final Inspection for the Lagoon Soils Remediation Project.Your inspection revealed that "Keep Out" signs \vere needed at each of the gates, and the survey stakesneeded to be removed from the cap.
As of October 15, 1996, the signs have been placed on the gates and the stakes have been removed fromthe cap.
Please call our office if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC.
James A. Susan, P.E.
tc
cc: Mr. Rob Franks - MDEQMr. Seth Bryson - CH2M HillMr. Ronald M. Graham - Mark IV Audio, Inc.Mr. Kenneth G. Wiley, C.P.G. - FTC&HMr David L. Conklin, P.E. - FTC&H
J:\DOC93\C93307Q\LTCHOW3 .JAS
6090 (tat Fulton • Ada, Michigan 49301-0211 - 616/676 2666 - FAX 616/676-SI7