Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Information · understanding and make a positive difference, both locally...

Fall 2015

Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Information

5- Year Capital Request Planning and Capital Outlay Request

Submitted by:

OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE

VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES

Satish Udpa Executive Vice President

for Administrative Services

Michigan State University Hannah Administration Building

426 Audilofium Road, Room 412 East Lansing, Michigan

48824

Phooe 517.355.5014 Fax 517.353 6772

www.adminsv.msu.edu

MSU is an affirmative-action,

equa~oppo,tunlty employer.

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

October 30, 20 I 5

Mr. John S. Roberts State Budget Director State Budget Office State of Michigan Lansing, Michigan 48909

Dear Mr. Roberts,

In accordance with the State Budget Office instructions an update of Michigan State University's Five-Year Capital Plan and Capital Outlay request has been posted at the following institutional website: http://opb.msu.edu/msuinfo/. The Five-Year Capital Planning document follows from your instructions and the academic direction of the university. The university's SFY2017 Capital Outlay submittal can be found in Appendix G. It addresses both deferred maintenance and programmatic needs of the campus.

While we provide an expanded list of capital investment needs, our top priority for a funding partnership with the State is the construction of a STEM Teaching and Learning Facility. Over the past ten years credit hours in STEM and STEM-related courses. at MSU have increased by 38 percent. The facility will support this increase in STEM instruction and bring together currently dispersed and outdated instructional teaching laboratories and related instructional and support spaces to create a hub for STEM education. The new facility will support the changing curriculums and teaching methods associated with STEM. It will leverage interdisciplinary teaching and learning with goals to improve recruitment, retention and student success, and graduate individuals that are prepared to contribute to society and support economic development in the state and beyond.

In reviewing the university's 5-Year Capital Outlay request, you will see that the projects support programs that have strong national reputations, expanding research bases, and high enrollment demand that will sustain the university and its contributions to Michigan. Emphasis is placed on construction and renovation of facilities that focus on supporting current and future programmatic initiatives with an emphasis in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, including biomedical, biological and engineering sciences. We believe that investment in these critical resources will achieve advancements in engineering and the sciences, support and facilitate innovation; interdisciplinary teaching and learning, and research collaborations, and pay dividends now and in the long term, both economically and intellectually for the citizens of Michigan and beyond.

We remain committed to Michigan businesses, students, and families, and continue to be a critical partner in sustaining Michigan's reinvention and economic transfonnation.

Sincerely,

Dr. Satish Udpa Executive Vice President for Administrative Services

C: President Lou Anna K. Simon, Provost June Youatt, Vice President Mark Burnham

Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Information Capital Outlay Request

5-Year Capital Request Planning Table of Contents

Page

I. Mission Statement 1

II. Instructional Program and Structural Needs 5

III. Staffing and Enrollment 11

IV. Facilities Assessment 12

V. Implementation 20

VI. Capital Outlay Planning 23

VII. Conclusion 25

Appendices:

Appendix A: Mission Statement

Appendix B: Campus Master Plan Update 2011

Appendix C: Buildings by Age

Appendix D: Student Enrollments – Fall Semester 2015

Appendix E: Building Condition Assessment

Appendix F: Utility System Distribution Needs

Appendix G: SFY2017 Capital Outlay Request

Appendix H: Facility for Rare Isotope Beams

Five-year Capital Request Planning and Capital Outlay Request, October 2015

1

Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Information Michigan State University Five-year Capital Planning and Capital Outlay Request

Preface Capital planning at Michigan State University occurs within the context of 2020 Vision: A Community Concept for the Michigan State University Campus. This comprehensive, multiyear master plan establishes the framework and direction for capital planning and will, with recurring updates, support the institution’s mission over the next 20 years. Programmatically driven, components of the master plan include major infrastructure systems: buildings, environmental sustainability, land use, parking, transportation, utility infrastructure and open space. Elements of the master plan will be referenced within this document. The University’s master plan was updated during spring 2011 and, after a collaborative university-wide process, was approved by the MSU Board of Trustees in December 2011. 1 A copy is attached under Appendix B. I. Mission Statement For more than 150 years, Michigan State University has been advancing knowledge and transforming lives through high-impact, innovative teaching, research, and outreach initiatives. Today, as it continues to help students become responsible, knowledgeable and productive citizens, MSU is a major public research university with global reach and extraordinary impact. Michigan State University, a member of the Association of American Universities and one of the top 100 research universities in the world, was founded in 1855. We are an inclusive, academic community known for our traditionally strong academic disciplines and professional programs, and our liberal arts foundation. Our cross- and interdisciplinary enterprises connect the sciences, humanities, and professions in practical, sustainable, and innovative ways to address society’s rapidly changing needs.

As a public, research-intensive, land-grant university, funded in part by the State of Michigan, our mission is to advance knowledge and transform lives by:

providing outstanding undergraduate, graduate, and professional education to promising, qualified students in order to prepare them to contribute fully to society as globally engaged citizen leaders

1 The 5-year, 2011 update, was approved by the Board of Trustees on December 9, 2011.


2

conducting research of the highest caliber that seeks to answer questions and create solutions in order to expand human understanding and make a positive difference, both locally and globally

advancing outreach, engagement, and economic development activities that are innovative, research-driven, and lead to a better quality of life for individuals and communities, at home and around the world.2

MSU is one of only 20 public land-grant universities with membership in the Association of American Universities. Ten years ago, at the launch of the 150th Anniversary of Michigan State University in 2005, we made a commitment to be recognized world-wide as the leading land-grant research university in the nation. This commitment was framed in our Boldness by Design strategy. Beginning in 2012, we refined and expanded this framework to refresh our strategic vision, now articulated as Bolder by Design. At the heart of Bolder by Design are the original five imperatives of Boldness by Design, plus a sixth one that reflects the urgency and acceleration demanded by today’s higher education environment. This sixth imperative applies to all five imperatives and every area of our mission providing high-impact, high-value results, experiences, and services. Together, we will focus and excel in:

Enhancing the student experience

Enriching community, economic, and family life

Expanding international reach

Increasing research opportunities

Strengthening stewardship

Advancing our culture of high performance In addition, we continuously re-affirm our commitment to the land-grant movement through: access to a quality post-secondary education; inclusion, not only of diverse populations, but of practical, applied knowledge with the classics throughout the curriculum; and connectivity with society to disseminate knowledge widely to meet the needs of individuals, communities and the world at large. Since 2005, we have made great progress despite pressing constraints. Michigan State University’s design was never just about survival but rather resilience, and we have achieved it, sparking innovation in every area of our enterprise during a time when many individuals, communities and organizations have been held at a standstill. Whether through job-creating innovations and life-saving research or its world-class education and talent development, MSU’s full impact is often immeasurable, but can be quantified in one sense with a reported annual economic impact of more than $5 billion.

2 See http://president.msu.edu/mission/


3

MSU continues to ensure that research programs grow, providing an impetus for economic development while creating a culture of innovation and creativity that maintains the University’s international competitiveness. MSU is a leader in creating knowledge for the 21st century, receiving more than $584 million in sponsored program awards in 2014-15. This represents a 10 percent growth over 2013-14. Research and scholarly work of this magnitude have a significant impact on the state economy, both in expenditures and in jobs. The university’s top federal funding agencies in 2014-15 were the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the U.S. Department of Energy. MSU actively pursues economic growth through programs across the university. Our value proposition of high-quality programs with accessibility to qualified students reaches individuals from all Michigan counties, all 50 U.S. states, and more than 130 countries. MSU has a long commitment of partnering with students to assure their educational goals are attainable. In accordance with long-term trends, MSU routinely enrolls approximately 17 percent of Michigan public university students, with approximately three-fourths of all MSU undergraduates coming from Michigan. In an ongoing effort to uphold its commitment to access, MSU has established strong and substantial financial aid programs to assure student access to high-quality MSU programs. Not surprisingly, almost 65 percent of all MSU students receive some form of financial aid. To preserve access, MSU dedicated more than $127 million in the 2015-16 budget for financial aid and is serving approximately 5,000 more students than ten years ago. As a result of this commitment to access, MSU now enrolls approximately 10 percent more high-need students (students with family incomes of less than $10,000 annually) when compared to its five-year average. Further, MSU is one of only two Big Ten institutions to maintain its population of Pell-eligible students over the decade, with approximately 22 percent of undergraduates receiving a Pell grant. In addition to high-need students, MSU carefully monitors the distribution of its student family income and focuses significant aid resources toward students with family income just above Pell levels. The result of our dedication to access and careful stewardship is that only 46 percent of undergraduates leave MSU with debt, significantly less than the national average of 69 percent. MSU fulfills the mission of the Morrill Act in the 21st century by taking the best of Michigan to the world and bringing the best of the world to Michigan. Thinking globally has always been a priority at MSU. MSU is ranked in the top ten nationally for both study abroad participation and international student enrollment, according to the Institute of International Education’s Open Doors Report. More than 1,400 faculty members are involved in international research, teaching and service projects and programs, and MSU maintains partnerships with 270 international institutions. We continue to expand our reach around the globe by:


4

Playing a leading role in the federal government’s Feed the Future initiative to help fight global hunger and poverty and create sustainable and safe agricultural opportunities in developing countries. A few examples of MSU’s work in this area include: a $10 million grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to lead the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy, partnering with the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, D.C., and South Africa’s University of Pretoria; a $16.3 million federal grant from the Borlaug Higher Education Agricultural Research and Development program to train a new generation of agricultural scientists in developing countries; and a $5.8 million USAID grant to improve potato production in Bangladesh and Indonesia.

Partnering with The MasterCard Foundation to bring academically talented and economically disadvantaged youth in Sub-Saharan Africa to MSU to pursue undergraduate and graduate studies at MSU. This $45 million award is an acknowledgment of MSU’s more than fifty year history of engagement and partnership with Africa.

Using a $7.8 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help eight African nations improve their sustainable farming methods. The grant, from the Gates Foundation Global Development Program, guides policymaking efforts to intensify farming methods that meet agricultural needs while improving environmental quality in Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Zambia, Ethiopia and Tanzania.

Serving as home to the Global Center for Food Systems Innovation, a USAID Higher Education Solutions Network development lab focused on creating, testing, and enabling the scaling of effective solutions and evidence-based approaches to a defined set of future critical global trends impacting food systems.

Michigan State University is committed to providing world-class opportunities for success and to making those opportunities available to a broad spectrum of talented students from across Michigan and around the world. The institution manages its resources as effectively as possible to ensure that it continues to provide an education that allows graduates to take on leadership roles in the 21st century. Consistent with its land-grant roots, MSU provides increasingly diverse learning experiences that blend the theoretical with the practical. Study abroad, hands-on research engagement, and service-learning all complement a variety of classroom experiences to provide rich learning opportunities for students. At MSU, the educational experience is focused on preparing “T-shaped” graduates who are prepared not just for their first job, but for a lifelong career. Curricular and co-curricular experiences aim to help students develop both deep knowledge within a specific content area as well as a broad set of skills across content areas focused on critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and communication.


5

II. Instructional Program and Structural Needs

As one of 62 members of the prestigious Association of American Universities, a Carnegie Research University (very high research activity) institution, and Michigan’s land-grant university, Michigan State is dedicated to reflecting its mission in its instructional offerings.

The continuing high quality of MSU’s educational offerings has led to a steady increase in demand from students near and far. Indicators of this increased demand include:

Received 35,303 freshman applications this year, up from 33,211 last year. Total enrollment for fall 2015 is at a new high of 50,543 - keeping MSU in the top ten public universities in enrollment in the country.

Average high school grade point of entering students is approximately 3.68 and average ACT scores approximate 25.7. Both reflect an upward trend over the past five years.

MSU experienced its highest number of applications and admissions, resulting in a fall 2015 entering undergraduate class of 7,967 students, and includes 1,705 students of color – an increase of 6 percent from last year - and 1,016 international undergraduate students.

Total graduate enrollment, including graduate professional students, is expected to approximate 11,400, of which 1,748 are new graduates and 606 are new graduate-professional students.

MSU continues to have an outstanding record of students earning prestigious national and international scholarships. In 2015, three Boren Scholars, two Goldwater Scholars, one Presidential Fellow, one Udall Scholar, and one Churchill Scholar were named. This brings MSU’s total to 29 Boren Scholars, 42 Goldwater Scholars, 9 Presidential Fellows, 11 Udall Scholars, and 18 Churchill Scholars, along with 16 Rhodes Scholar, 16 Truman Scholar, and 17 Marshall Scholar recipients.

Michigan State offers more than 200 programs of study, many of them nationally ranked, to meet the needs of Michigan citizens and students from across the country and around the world. MSU’s undergraduate Supply Chain Management Program ranks #1 and the Broad College of Business is ranked 11th among public universities for undergraduate business programs, according to U.S. News & World Report rankings. Five MSU graduate programs—nuclear physics, organizational psychology, elementary education, secondary education, and rehabilitation counseling—are ranked #1 nationally by U.S. News & World Report. In addition, U.S News again mentions MSU for having outstanding study abroad and service learning programs.


6

Academic and professional degree and certificate programs are extended to off-campus learners via MSU Global, with more than 20,000 enrollments in more than 80 degree and certificate programs, while also offering noncredit instruction for advanced placement students and technology training for K–12 teachers. Michigan State University will continue its focus on increasing access to MSU’s instructional and knowledge resources through a variety of technologically mediated venues.

To ensure MSU remains a best value for students and other stakeholders, the university monitors its standing against relevant regional, national, and international peers. Areas of importance include academic quality, efficiency and value, affordability and access, and economic impact. To remain competitive, MSU must be an effective steward of its resources. As an operational baseline, in addition to targeted reductions, MSU imposes a 1 percent funding reduction annually on all units to encourage operating efficiency and create resources to invest in new initiatives. With resources focused on mission-centric areas of the institution, MSU continues to preserve its academic rigor with a competitive student-faculty ratio (17:1) that is consistent with the Big Ten public universities’ average. Major initiatives supported through strategic investments include restructuring of the student services model, including the implementation of student success-focused campus neighborhoods; expansion of our medical colleges’ programs; and an initiative to invest significant recurring funding in hiring new tenure system faculty in high demand research areas such as computational sciences, biomedical engineering, and plant sciences.

As we maintain and enhance the academic quality of our program offerings, we must also be vigilant about the quality, flexibility and expansion needed for our academic and instructional space.

Intention-based research is central to MSU’s mission and to building a mid-Michigan “talent center.” Thus, MSU must provide state-of-the-art facilities and infrastructure that will help attract and retain top-quality faculty and researchers. This is vital to remaining competitive in key fields, both nationally and internationally. Through entrepreneurship and a systems approach, MSU research moves rapidly from classrooms and laboratories to create new products, new industries, and new jobs. Examples of facilities that are attracting researchers and professionals include:

In June 2015, ground was broken for the MSU Grand Rapids Research Center. The need for biomedical research space in Grand Rapids is crucial to support the projected growth of MSU and its NIH-funded research portfolios, including the research arm of the College of Human Medicine. Through December 2014, the medical school has recruited 18 principal investigators (PIs) and their scientific teams to West Michigan and now fully occupies all desirable laboratory space available to MSU in current Grand Rapids facilities. Over the next two years, the college


7

anticipates recruiting another 6-9 additional PIs. The new MSU Grand Rapids Biomedical Research Center is planned to open in late 2017.

The Food Processing and Innovation Center (FPIC), set to open in 2016, will serve as a place for established companies to create and commercialize vibrant new food products. FPIC will be funded through a $2.6 million grant from the Economic Development Administration of the United States Department of Commerce, with matching funds from the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, MSU Extension, and MSU AgBioResearch. The goal of FPIC is to increase economic activity and jobs created by the expansion of food processing and manufacturing companies. Private companies can use modern, flexible equipment to commercialize and scale up new food products and production processes at a lower cost and lower risk within the FPIC facility than they could on their own.

April 2014 brought the announcement of the establishment of the Center for Research on Ingredient Safety (CRIS). An independent, academic, science-based center, CRIS will serve as a reliable and unbiased source for information, research, training and analysis on the safe use of chemical ingredients in consumer packaged goods including foods, beverages, cosmetics and household consumer products. The establishment of CRIS was made possible through association with the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The work of the Center will also include collaborations with the University of Michigan Risk Science Center, which will lead communications efforts for this initiative.

MSU’s new Bio Engineering Facility will open in January 2016. The building will serve as a hub for interdisciplinary research in the biomedical and engineering health sciences, bringing together researchers from various disciplines. The primary occupants will be faculty from MSU’s Colleges of Engineering, Human Medicine and Natural Science. The building, with its emphasis on bringing together engineers and basic science researchers with medical researchers, will provide remarkable opportunities for solving some of humanity’s biggest challenges and attract more competitive, nationally funded projects and recruit the best minds to work with us – both faculty and graduate students. Laboratories in the building will have an open-floor design to enhance collaborative research and provide flexibility as the nature of research evolves.

MSU’s faculty bring in significant new grants for far-reaching projects. Most have substantial implications for lab space, equipment, and facilities. Examples include:


8

In 2009, MSU’s National Superconducting Laboratory was awarded the Department of Energy federal science project in nuclear research titled: Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB). FRIB will be a new U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science national user facility for nuclear science research. The centerpiece of the new user facility will be a superconducting linear accelerator that will increase dramatically the reach of rare isotope research in the United States. The accelerator will produce isotopes that normally exist only in the most extreme environments in the universe and will expand the usefulness of isotopes in a broad range of applications from modeling stars to understanding the workings of nanoscale electronic devices.

FRIB is an important project for American science and the State. It not only will keep MSU on the cutting edge of nuclear science, but will ensure the training of the nuclear scientists of tomorrow while bolstering the economies of mid-Michigan and the entire State. FRIB will cost $730 million to design and build. In FY14, the State made a commitment to bond and service the community cost share of $94.5 million. Construction began in 2012 and will be completed by 2022. It is projected to create hundreds of jobs in mid-Michigan while bringing in more than $1 billion of economic activity to Michigan in the next 20 years. MSU looks forward to continuing its partnership with the State of Michigan to assure the successful completion of this project.

MSU and the University of Wisconsin-Madison are partnering in the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center with $125 million in funding from the U.S. Department of Energy, focusing on the conversion of plant biomass to bioenergy.

The MSU Fraunhofer Center for Coatings and Diamond Technologies is expanding with a $5 million investment by MSU and corporate partner Fraunhofer USA. The addition of 15,000 square feet of space will allow the number of scientists to double from approximately 30 to 60 once the expansion is complete. The lab focuses on thin-film coatings and growing diamonds for industrial purposes in the areas of manufacturing and automobiles. The expanded center is expected to generate $7 million in research revenues annually.

A national team of 20 scientists led by MSU was awarded a $6.5 million grant to accelerate the development of disease-resistant cucurbit crops through leveraging applied genomics with the goal of helping with the production of watermelon, melon, cucumber, and squash. Using genomics to address disease resistance is the most cost effective and environmentally favorable solution available.

Michigan State University is teaming up with the University of Michigan, Wayne State University, Indiana University and Van Andel Research Institute to implement a high-speed infrastructure that will allow scientists to access and share their research across the region with unprecedented


9

ease. This new Multi-Institutional Open Storage Research InfraStructure (MI-OSiRIS) initiative was launched through a $5 million grant from the National Science Foundation and will enable researchers to collaborate their efforts in making new discoveries.

MSU is the leader in a research project funded by a $10 million grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Homeland Security to create the Center for Advancing Microbial Risk Assessment, a consortium of scientists from seven universities with expertise in quantitative microbial risk assessment methods, biosecurity, and infectious disease transmission through environmental exposure.

MSU has joined with the University of Notre Dame and the University of Chicago to establish a Physics Frontier Center for Nuclear Astrophysics funded by a five-year, $10 million National Science Foundation grant.

MSU is among several institutions to share a five-year, $25 million grant designed to prepare students to work on the country’s security needs, including the threat posed by the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons. The grant from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Nuclear Security Administration will fund the Nuclear Science and Security Consortium, which will focus on education and hands-on training.

MSU received two National Science Foundation grants totaling $5.7 million, funds that will utilize computer software to analyze student writing in science and engineering classes. The goal is to help retain more students who are enrolled in STEM disciplines – science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Our continued success in meeting our value proposition of high quality programs with access to qualified students demands that we continue to provide high quality, collaborative, flexible, technology enabled and expanded academic and instructional spaces. The approach to teaching has become more interactive across all disciplines, and the use of instructional technology has changed significantly what faculty and students accomplish in classrooms and teaching labs—and how they do so. All areas of research, instruction, and outreach rely heavily on technology and the underlying infrastructure that makes them possible. There is active promotion and use of technology-enabled teaching/learning models for on-campus and off-campus students, as well as an initiative to provide facilities that support evolving pedagogies including student-centered and collaborative learning. Quality support services, such as libraries, computers, specialized labs, field stations, clinics, informal learning areas, and state-of-the-art equipment, need to be sustained at a level commensurate with support of nationally competitive research and scholarship efforts that are consistent with instructional goals. The convergence of these factors calls for increased investment in the facilities and equipment that support these developments.


10

As a result of these many factors, MSU has examined the capital assets necessary to support academic programs and identified needs that involve new construction, comprehensive renewal, renovation, reprogramming of selected facilities, and renewal of major subsystems in other facilities.

The institution’s assessment of existing facilities shows that the infrastructure components of many campus buildings have aged significantly. Despite ongoing maintenance and repair, which in most cases has extended the expected usable life of components well beyond the industry standard, many buildings are now at a point where they require significant investment or must be replaced.3

The demands placed upon building systems by updated building codes and more sophisticated programs, many of which are equipment and ventilation-intensive, have resulted in facilities that act as a barrier rather than a support to program success. For example, higher environmental protection and safety standards place pressure on day-to-day maintenance and in some cases exceed the capacity of particular systems.

The proliferation and advancements in technology across disciplines requires updating of data resources and distribution systems. The configuration of older building spaces limits the efficient use of the areas available to programs and can hinder collaboration and interactions. Increasingly complicated and environmentally sensitive equipment places higher demands on power for operating and climate control for proper functioning.

In summary, new construction is necessary to provide facility capacity in support of the growing research enterprise and accommodate programs with requirements that significantly exceed the capabilities of current facilities. This is especially true when current facilities are either too costly to renovate compared to the benefits realized and/or inadequate in the amount of space provided.

The needs for existing facilities include repairing and replacing internal building systems, such as electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and structural renewal; reworking interiors to increase the utilization and functionality of the space; and, attending to the building envelope in order to maintain the integrity of the building. In some cases, the improvements are needed for only selected aspects of a facility; in others, total renovation and/or replacement of the building is warranted.

Following a very detailed and carefully conceived master planning process, it was found that over the next 20 years, the University would need approximately a 10 percent increase in building space. The growth in space is driven by a planned increase in the number of faculty and the anticipated increase in funded scientific research, selective and qualitative changes in academic teaching programs, the enhancement of common facilities that enrich campus life and the

3 See Appendix C: Map of Campus Buildings by Age.


11

sense of community, and the consolidation and upgrading of operational support facilities.

III. Staffing and Enrollment

For 2015, fall enrollment at Michigan State University totaled 50,543. These numbers represent careful and deliberate enrollment management in an effort to maintain academic quality and to continue to provide the optimal classroom and laboratory environments for all students. 70 percent of the overall students at MSU are Michigan residents, representing virtually every county in the state; 76 percent of the undergraduate students are Michigan residents. There has been a steady increase in applications over the last five years. Over this period the entering class high school grade point average has improved and ACT scores remained stable.

A summary of enrollments for fall 2015 by college and level can be found in Appendix D. Based on Michigan demographic data, enrollment management practices at the University, and current faculty/staff and physical infrastructure resources, enrollment patterns over the next five years are projected to remain stable. Current enrollment is at an all-time high.

While the University currently offers bachelor’s or bachelor’s completion programs and master’s programs off campus and the Virtual University continues to increase access to programs through web-supported and entirely web-based courses, it is important to note that the vast majority of students utilize the facilities of MSU’s East Lansing campus to complete their degree programs. The University will continue to expand opportunities to offer instruction that complements more traditional academic programs, but it is expected that the majority of enrolled students will continue to utilize the main campus.

The full-time equivalent faculty and academic staff count for fall 2015 is approximately 5,000. Of that total, a significant percentage is engaged in instruction, with the rest distributed across research, public service, academic and student support services, and other institutional support areas. Based upon current enrollment patterns and research planning, MSU anticipates between 70- 100 additional faculty members over the next five years.

The current average class size for lower division undergraduate classes is approximately 48 students. The average class size is approximately 36 for upper division undergraduate classes and 15 for graduate classes. The most recent calculation of the student/faculty ratio is 17:1, which is consistent with the Big 10 public average.


12

IV. Facilities Assessment

In addition to seeking and retaining high-quality faculty, staff, and students, MSU recognizes that its physical infrastructure requires ongoing evaluation, maintenance, and renovation in a manner that is consistent with the high quality of its personnel and programs. As one of MSU’s most important assets, the built environment supports the institution’s academic mission of teaching, research, and outreach, creates a sense of place for the campus and surrounding communities, and facilitates the successful performance of students, faculty, and staff in their various roles. Perceptions of the built environment are a significant component in the overall campus experience.

The physical infrastructure of Michigan State University broadly encompasses buildings; the utility generation and distribution system; the campus grounds, including the natural and built landscape, sidewalks, roadways, and paved parking; and the electronic network that supports the delivery of modern technologies.

In an effort to better understand and plan for the campus capital infrastructure, a Geographic Information System (GIS) is utilized. This spatial and tabular database tool brings together, in a logical framework, data that record a description of the capital infrastructure. The GIS continues to evolve and increase in sophistication. At present, data such as condition, use, special planning characteristics, and other related information support ongoing assessment, cross-unit planning, and more effective allocation of limited dollars to institutional priorities.

The campus grounds, including the natural and built landscape, are a principal aspect of the campus infrastructure. The main East Lansing campus approximates 5,200 acres, or eight square miles. The developed campus is 2,100 acres, and the experimental research farm area approximates 2,800 acres.

Yet, despite this rich land area, the master planning process recognizes that land resources are finite and should be conserved for future generations. As a result, the master plan adopted an approach of compact campus development. While allowing for some horizontal expansion across the campus, this approach protects the capacity and contiguity of the farm areas and uses a strategy of carefully conceived “infill” on the developed campus.

The developed campus is recognized as one of the nation’s most beautiful campuses. This is particularly true of the North Campus “Circle Area” where the university first developed. The open space quality of this area, the Red Cedar River corridor, and the Sanford and Baker woodlots is very highly regarded and reinforces the social and intellectual vitality of the campus. Currently, the campus arboretum has 1,900 different taxa, represented by more than 18,900 individual trees, and innumerable


13

shrubs and vines, which serve as a vast collection for research, teaching, and demonstration, as well as to provide landscape value.

The developed landscape has an estimated replacement value exceeding $345 million.

During the master planning process, it was determined that a need existed to extend this open space quality into the built environment of the South Campus. As a result, a proposed open space structure plan was developed and will be implemented over time.4 In conjunction with the open space plan and included in the update of the campus zoning ordinances, protected landscape areas also were designated and adopted.

There is also an extensive transportation system of approximately 54 lane miles of university-owned roadways with a replacement value of $39.9 million.

Currently, the condition of the roads is estimated to be 13 percent poor; 12 percent fair; 18 percent good; and 57 percent excellent. As campus streets are rebuilt, a significant emphasis is put on improving safety for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists, including ADA compliance.

The University owns eight bridges on campus; three are for pedestrians only, three are for both vehicles and pedestrians, and two are for trains. The bridges have a replacement value of $19.5 million. One bridge is in fair condition, four are in good condition, and three are in excellent condition.

There are 114 miles of walkways valued at $40.9 million.

By MSU Board of Trustees policy, the parking system of approximately 26,041 spaces for students, faculty, staff, and visitors is self-supporting and has a replacement value of approximately $268.4 million - $129.5 million for six parking structures and $138.8 million for surface parking. One parking structure is in poor-to-fair condition, two are in good condition, and three are in excellent condition. The condition of the approximately 21,040 surface parking spaces breaks down to 31 percent poor; 19 percent fair; 20 percent good; and 29 percent excellent.

As a continuation of the master planning process, the All University Traffic and Transportation Committee addresses the issues related to parking access, the location of new facilities and the associated cost implications, and ways to increase use of mass transit and non-motorized transportation.

Since the Capital Area Transit Authority began bus service on campus in 1998, ridership has increased from 830,000 to nearly 3 million rides in fiscal year 2015. CATA routes which connect surrounding community

4 See Appendix B: MSU Campus Master Plan Executive Summary, Open Space Framework and Protected

Landscape Plan, pages 11–20.


14

areas to the MSU campus have also seen a significant increase in ridership over time, moving from 450,000 to more than 1.7 million rides over the same period.

The master planning process also helped to identify sites for potential additional parking facilities to support future growth and the displacement of existing parking for other uses.5 Perimeter parking options will reduce vehicular congestion in the central campus and improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. Removal of on-street parking in order to reduce traffic accidents and improve safety is well underway, and will continue over time as opportunities arise.

Michigan State University’s campus comprises approximately 22.93 million gross square feet of building space in 545 structures, including both general-fund and self-supporting facilities. The replacement cost of the buildings is calculated at $4.22 billion. University general-fund buildings account for approximately 12.94 million square feet of space representing $2.74 billion in replacement cost, and Residential and Hospitality Services and other self-supporting facilities account for approximately 9.99 million square feet and the remaining $ 1.48 billion.

Facility condition appraisals, including the utility distribution system, are updated on an ongoing basis using input from University maintenance and custodial staff, as well as the users of the buildings. College and program units also provide programmatic facility reviews and forward needs through the annual program planning and review process.

A comprehensive building appraisal for general-fund facilities has been completed and receives updates as various needs are addressed and systems are re-examined.

Building deferred maintenance needs are identified on many campuses utilizing the “industry-expected useful life” of the various significant building components. At MSU, this approach substantially overstates needs, since the effective maintenance program typically results in building components lasting much longer than the industry standard.

In order to develop a more accurate prediction of facility needs, MSU adopted a “just-in-time” approach to project major maintenance needs. This technique considers the age of major building components, adjusted to account for each component’s maintenance history and current condition based on field observations. Using this facility assessment technique, the five-year major maintenance facility needs (apart from the utility distribution system) for general-fund facilities is approximately $203.6 million, or an average of $40.7 million per year.

5 See Appendix B: MSU Campus Master Plan Executive Summary, Building Opportunity Framework map,

page 10.


15

As noted earlier, the assessment information is maintained in the Geographic Information System. A more specific year-to-year breakdown of the GIS data is shown in Appendix E.

The college and program units provide programmatic facility reviews and forward space needs, including alteration and improvement requests, and major capital planning needs through the annual program planning and review process. This process identifies the high-priority programmatic needs of the campus through an annual, systematic approach.

Because of the dynamic nature of academic and academic-support programs, the planning horizon for these requests is typically five years. The types of projects forwarded through this process include, for example, the comprehensive renovation of a research lab to support current research foci and sophisticated research equipment and modifications to office and dry research space for improved efficiency and program functionality. This process also helps inform the broader capital needs by identifying programmatic areas that would benefit from new construction.

Based on the most recent planning cycle, approximately $11.3 million is needed in fiscal year 2016 to address high priority, selected programmatic improvements. It is anticipated that this magnitude of annual funding need will continue through fiscal year 2020 and beyond, given the limited resources, age of the physical plant, growth in research and changes in teaching pedagogy. This information, coupled with the maintenance facility review listed in Appendices E, and F, provides a comprehensive overview of both maintenance and programmatic needs.

This also enables the University to coordinate projects and assemble the work scope in a way that reduces overall project costs by coupling programmatic alteration needs with infrastructure improvements and the removal of maintenance items. As a result, limited building improvement funds are expended more effectively.

The utility generation and distribution systems are also major components of the campus infrastructure. The generation system includes the T. B. Simon Plant, a modern coal/gas-fired cogeneration power plant with an interconnection to the national electrical power grid. Since 2009-2010, through the use of co-generated power, the main campus has decreased coal use by 65 percent, which comprises the largest contribution to our decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. The replacement value of this facility is $285 million.

At present, forthcoming state and federal regulatory changes are being evaluated for their impact on power plant systems. The distribution system includes water lines (approximately 71 miles), steam lines in tunnels (approximately 27 miles), direct buried steam lines (approximately 3 miles), electrical conduit and cable (approximately 168 miles), communication cable and fiber (approximately 106 miles), storm and sanitary sewers (approximately 156 miles), and chilled water distribution


16

(more than seven miles). The replacement value of the utility system is approximately $309 million.

While we have made significant investment to update the north campus steam and electric utility systems, the south campus systems have deteriorated and are in need of repairs to provide reliable service and meet the service demands of the overall campus community. Improvement needs over the next five-year period are calculated at approximately $75 million.

MSU has a long history of demonstrated energy conservation. Since the energy crisis of the 1970’s the university has continued to reduce consumption using a central building energy management system, combined heat and power energy generation with an underground utility micro-grid on main campus, and enhanced construction standards which incorporate the United States Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design requirements for sustainability. Recently the Board of Trustees approved a 10 MWatt solar array constructed as carports over parking lots on campus with a power purchase agreement and estimated completion date of 2017.

In April of 2012 the MSU Board of Trustees adopted the Energy Transition Plan setting goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 30 percent by 2015 and increase renewable energy 15 percent by 2015. The long range energy strategy approved by the MSU Board of Trustees will help prepare the University to be a responsible global citizen and become a model community of economic sustainability. The university has made the commitment to no longer use coal as a fuel source, by 2016, as one step towards this commitment. Progress on the energy transition plan includes reduced greenhouse gas emission by 25 percent and once the solar carports are completed increased renewables by 13 percent from baseline fiscal year 2010.

The university joined the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Better Buildings Challenge (BBC) which is an initiative to reduce energy consumption in commercial buildings across the nation. The university pledged to reduce energy consumption by 20 percent in 20 million square feet of facilities by the year 2020. A five year plan has been developed to retro-commission 115 major buildings, including energy audits of these facilities, which will enable the university to meet the DOE’s Better Buildings Challenge goals. To date, the university has reduced energy use intensity by close to 10 percent (weather adjusted) on average across the fleet of buildings on the East Lansing campus.

All major buildings on campus have smart electrical metering for viewing real time data at http://energydashboard.msu.edu. In addition, an interactive energy dashboard is available in the lobby of Emmons Hall and Brody Hall to raise student awareness of consumption. On-line access to monthly and annual reports on energy consumption and waste/recycling


17

efforts by building are also available.6 Access to this data is part of the University’s effort to educate the campus community about its consumption and encourage conservation.

MSU is committed to being good stewards of our resources by reducing consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and increasing recycling.

A five year plan to retro-commission 115 major buildings, in over 16 million square feet of space, including mechanical system energy audits, is currently in process through 2016. A 20 – 30 percent reduction in energy consumption is being estimated in the initial group of buildings that have completed the process, including implementation of energy conservation measures. While this process will be complete for the academic and general fund building will be complete, the data generated will be used to inform the ongoing commissioning process which is instrumental in meeting the BBC and campus goals with regard to energy conservation. Included in the existing building commissioning process is a Spartan Treasure Hunt, which engages faculty and staff in finding potential energy savings ideas for the buildings they work in.

The commitment to increase recycling is supported by the opening of the MSU Surplus Store and Recycling Center in 2009, which can accommodate three times the amount of materials as the former MSU recycling facility. A comprehensive recycling program, coupled with the expanded facility capacity, will allow the university to expand recycling collection to all occupied buildings on campus.

A primary component of the teaching and learning environment is the University’s instructional space. The University maintains approximately 310 centrally scheduled classrooms and lecture halls, and approximately 700 departmentally assigned instructional spaces. These spaces range from traditional classrooms that can be utilized by any discipline to more specialized spaces, such as teaching laboratories with fume hoods and wet-bench space. As part of the University’s main campus facilities, the instructional space accounts for approximately 1.2M assignable square feet.

For fall semester 2014, utilization of these instructional spaces by scheduled instructional periods ranges as high as 72 percent of the available hours, and averages 61 percent across all rooms for centrally scheduled classrooms. The seat utilization ranges as high as 73 percent of the available capacity and averages 63 percent across all rooms. One-time events, such as help sessions, department and student organization meetings, on average increases utilization by an 18-20 percent on average.

6 See http://energydashboard.msu.edu and www.gis.msu.edu

http://energydashboard.msu.edu/


18

Departmentally scheduled rooms that are scheduled regularly for courses averages 32 percent across all rooms, and ranges as high as 66 percent of the available hours. The seat utilization ranges as high as 77 percent of the available capacity and averages 40 percent across all rooms. The level of utilization is indicative of the highly specialized nature of these room types.

At this time, just under 50 percent of the instructional space is in fair to poor condition, with the remaining in good condition. Rooms in need of upgrade require either comprehensive or selected renovation, and include things such as replacement of furniture, ceiling, and lighting, painting; upgrade of power and data; and replacement of lab benches and fume hoods. Rooms requiring upgrades are identified through a multiyear improvement plan that is informed by on-site reviews of each room, input from users, and analysis of room utilization. In addition to these needs, the investments in instructional space must incorporate the shift to more learner-centric environments; the continuous evolution of technology and its role in teaching and learning; variations in pedagogy and delivery methods such as hybrid, flipped, and engaged and active learning.

The quality of these rooms are essential to the teaching and learning process. These rooms are intended to support a range of pedagogical methods from lecture to active learning environments. While the university has made significant improvements over the last few years, further investment is necessary in order to keep pace with the changes in learning methods, to continue to add value, and remain competitive in our recruitment and retention of high quality students and faculty, and increase participation at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. A $60M investment over 5 years, or $12 million annually, would make a substantial improvement in the condition of the university instructional environment.

Campus cabling infrastructure is composed of an extensive underground fiber optic system. This system carries backbone network data at 10 gigabits per second (Gb/sec), voice over internet protocol telephone traffic at 1 Gb/sec, cable television service, cellular carrier signals, two-way radio traffic and studio-quality video links. All told, this system provides data and video services to roughly 180 buildings on the main campus and more than 300,000 computers, servers, and other devices (wired and wireless). Another 40 buildings in the south campus farm district are connected by SkyPilot and Cisco mesh wireless connections.

In addition to the campus backbone network, each building has internal cabling infrastructure and equipment. Approximately 15 percent of the buildings have substandard cabling, and approximately 70 percent are in need of equipment upgrades. Over 5,200 access points provide wireless (Wi-Fi) service; about 50 percent of the buildings have ubiquitous coverage, 45 percent have partial coverage, and 5 percent have none.


19

The estimated replacement value of campus data/video equipment is $60 million; annual maintenance costs are in excess of $7.5 million.

A number of off-campus sites in the Lansing metropolitan area are connected via a 45-mile fiber optic ring operated by Zayo Enterprise Networks. Several other university facilities (e.g. Secchia Center, Kellogg Biological Station, Troy Management Education Center, MSU Bioeconomy Institute, MSU Detroit Center, etc.) are attached via MichNet. External network connectivity is provided via redundant 20 Gb/sec links to the commodity Internet and Internet2. These links, along with MichNet infrastructure, are operated by Merit Network, Inc.

University facilities beyond the East Lansing campus cover more than 20,300 acres and contribute to the built environment with 13 AgBioResearch research centers across the state (the Kellogg Biological Station and Saginaw Valley Research and Extension Center are examples); other agricultural field research locations include the South Campus Farms teaching and research centers; sites containing facilities for engineering research in Okemos; the BioEconomy Research and Development Center in Holland; the Michigan Biotechnology Institute in Lansing; conference facilities, such as Tollgate Education Center in Novi, the Management Education Center in Troy, and WaWaSum in Grayling; Hidden Lake Gardens in Tipton; and the Grand Rapids location of the College of Human Medicine.

The replacement value for the facilities located at these sites is calculated at more than $253 million. At nearly all of the research facilities, there is a continuing need to upgrade existing research space to meet current technological, regulatory, and operational requirements of researchers and funding organizations. Maintenance and infrastructure improvements include exterior repair/replacement, such as roofs, siding, and windows; technology upgrades, such as Ethernet, high-speed Internet, video streaming, data storage, Wi-Fi, remote access, remote control, remote monitoring, security; environmental enhancements directed at storm water and process water management, energy efficiency, green power, bio-fuels; regulatory requirement in air, water, environment, and personnel safety; and mechanical upgrades that include electrical, plumbing, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC).

HVAC systems consist of forced air, electric heat, steam heat, and cooling systems for research units and require periodic replacement and upgrades. Other facility repairs include well and septic systems that require continual maintenance and the periodic repair of roadways and parking areas. Research maintenance items consist of both wet and dry lab upgrades and equipment replacement, while conference facilities require continual improvements and expansion as they relate to extension and outreach. With more than 265 buildings located at various off-campus research, teaching, and extension facilities, the items listed above are placed on a 5 to 10-year maintenance schedule, valued at $1.5M per year.


20

While the University has obtained facility improvement funds by issuing bonds, the University’s general revenues secure these debt instruments and the facilities are not encumbered. The exceptions to this are the completed Chemistry Building addition; Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building; Anthony Hall, including the Dairy Plant and Meats Lab; Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health laboratory building; and the Bio Engineering Facility. These facilities were funded in part with bonds issued by the Michigan Department of Treasury State Building Authority (SBA) and secured by mortgages on the facilities, with the exception of the Bio Engineering Facility (completion date of December 31, 2015) which is currently in the SBA Commercial Paper program. V. Implementation Michigan State University’s approach to capital planning employs a continuous process that integrates academic, support, fiscal, and physical planning. Institutional participation in the planning process ensures that consideration is given to relevant issues and that decisions reflect the fundamental mission and direction of the University. Capital needs are informed by the University’s master plan and planning activities that occur within major components of the institution at regular cycles throughout the year. These components include the annual academic program planning and review, administrative support planning and review, deferred capital renewal, technology, utility systems, energy and sustainability planning, as well as planning for transportation (roads and sidewalks), parking, and open space. Within this context, budgetary and fiscal analyses at the local, state, and federal levels are taken into account. Within each component of planning, a number of more detailed issues are reviewed and examined relative to their impact on facilities over the short and long term. One approach used for this more detailed planning is the Campus Infrastructure Planning Work Group. Bringing together a comprehensive cross section of University constituents, the group evaluates infrastructure projects on a number of dimensions to ensure thoroughness of planning, conformance with master planning principles adopted by the MSU Board of Trustees, and impact across the University. As a matter of operating philosophy and practice, facility planning encompasses the following issues:

Renovations, as well as maintenance of existing campus facilities, and new construction are focused to support programs that are central to the academic mission of the University.

A fundamental guiding principle is that planning is holistic and comprehensive. In addition to capital renewal of existing facilities, academic program needs are considered and facility adaptation is planned


21

accordingly. A premium is placed on reuse of existing facilities, on conservation of open space, energy conservation, and on health, safety, security, and regulatory requirements. Barrier-free modifications are given priority, and needs related to technology are considered. Where appropriate, fixed building equipment, particularly for laboratories and classrooms, is included in the plans.

New construction and renovation of existing facilities are planned so a project’s financial investment actively reflects the life cycle of the facility in relation to the needs of the program, while providing flexibility in the structure to accommodate potential changes over the longer term. Through the “least life cycle cost analysis,” facilities are positioned to be responsive to immediate programmatic needs, as well as longer-term adaptation needs brought about by changes in programs, advances in technology, and related issues.

The least life cycle cost analysis also enables project development to focus on designs that reduce the ongoing maintenance cost of facilities. Within this context, MSU’s high-quality construction standards intentionally create plans and assemble materials that “design out” as much near and long-term maintenance as possible.

In summary, the anticipated expenses of a facility over its life cycle are carefully considered in relation to the initial investment in design and materials. Project decisions made within the context of MSU’s construction standards may, in some cases, be viewed as more expensive initially but, in practice, actually reduce maintenance and adaptation expenses that would otherwise be more costly in the longer term.

Through facility-planning activities, Michigan State University recognizes that campus programmatic and facility renewal issues are significant and constantly changing. As a result, needs exist simultaneously in three major areas:

1. New construction 2. Selected and comprehensive renovation 3. Maintenance of major building systems

Many more needs exist than can be addressed at any one time. However, within this context and informed by the planning processes described above, the institution is forwarding the projects listed in Section I of the following table for consideration of capital outlay funds. The STEM Teaching and Learning Facility is our top priority.7 Projects listed in Section II are currently in active planning or in process, with funding primarily from institutional resources. Within the context of this planning and the capital outlay process, Appendix H8 contains information

7 See Appendix G for the State Fiscal Year 2017 Capital Outlay Project Request – Attachment B for the

STEM Teaching and Learning Facility. 8 See Appendix H for FRIB.


22

regarding FRIB and the community cost share for which the state has committed funding.

Capital Planning and Major Maintenance SFY17-21 Planning Timeframe: One to Five Years

Project Description Prelim. Cost ($M)

Section I New Construction – New Buildings

1. STEM Teaching and Learning Facility – TOP PRIORITY $ 70.0

2. Interdisciplinary Science and Technology Building - Research Expansion and Need9 $ 120.0

4. Biological Safety Level 3– Modular Containment Laboratories for Research Needs $ 20.3

5. MSU Health Team Facility - New Clinical Care Facility9 TBD

6. Engineering Research Complex - Support Research Program Expansion & Needs $ 27.6

Renovations and Additions

1. Plant Science Facilities - Bio-economy (Total estimate $116.4M)

a. Additional Greenhouses – Research Expansion and Needs $ 6.4

b. Plant Biology Renovation - Renovation Teaching & Research Facilities $ 108.1

c. Greenhouse Renovation – Renovation E/W Range Teaching & Research $ 4.9

2. Music Facilities (Total estimate $72.8M)

a. Music Building Addition – Program Expansion and Needs $ 31.4

b. Music and Music Practice Bldg. – Renovate Bldg. Improved Program Support $ 43.3

3. Innovation Hub TBD

4. Recreational Sports and Fitness $ 35.0

5. Natural Science Building Renovation - Improved Program Support $ 106.3

6. Clinical Center A&B Building Renovation - Biological Sciences Research $ 141.0

7. Research Laboratory Renovations – Various $ 15.0

8. Laboratory Animal Resources – Renovate and Expand for Bio. Sci. Research Support $ 19.3

9. Giltner Hall – Selected Alterations and High-priority Maintenance $ 16.7

10. Erickson Hall Addition - Research Program Expansion and Need - Education $ 14.9

11. Shaw Lane Power Plant – Renovate for Academic Services $ 37.6

12. Student Services Building – Renovate for Student Support Services $ 20.4

10. Munn Ice Arena- Renovation and Addition9 $ 20.9

Major Systems Maintenance

1. Facility Mnt. Gen. Fund Bldgs.–Deferred Mnt., Energy, & Life Safety Improvements $ 203.6

2. Instructional Space Improvements – 5-year $ 60.0

Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) 10

Section II: Projects in Active Planning or In Process/Funding from OtherResources

Projects Authorized by Board of Trustees for Construction (Arranged Alphabetically)

Bio Engineering Facility- New Construction $ 57.7

Bio Engineering Facility – Build-out – Support Research Program Expansion $ 9.0

Breslin Berkowitz – Alterations to Basketball Offices $ 3.8

Children’s Garden – Restroom and Sewer Line $ 0.3

Crop Science – Field Laboratory – Addition 2 – Greenhouse $ 0.2

Crop Science – Field Laboratory – Storage Building 2 $ 0.3

Cyclotron – Office Addition – Phase 3 $ 29.4

Duffy Daugherty Football – Renovate Locker Rooms $ 5.5

Electrical Distribution Zone – Upgrade Northwest Zone $ 2.5

Engineering Building – Chiller Replacement $ 20.0

Grand Rapids Real Estate and Research Facility Development – New Construction $ 85.1

9 Project is a capital need and is listed for information purposes. State funding will not be requested.10 See Appendix H for FRIB.


23

Grand Rapids Research – Former Press Building Demolition $ 3.0

Life Science A Wing – Renovation $ 2.4

MSU College of Law – North Entrance Site Improvements $ 0.6

Projects Authorized by Board of Trustees for Construction (cont.)

MSU Community Music Scholl – Reconstruct Parking Lot $ 0.8

MSU Police – Special Response Team Ops Center $ 1.0

MSU Scene Shop – Construct Replacement Building $ 2.4

Natural Gas Distribution – New Pipeline from Mt. Hope $ 3.5

New Intercollegiate Gold Building – New Construction $ 6.0

North Campus Infrastructure- 2015- West Circle- Steam Distr. $ 9.5

Parking Lot 97 – Expansion $ 1.5

Power Plant Capacity – Renewable Energy Project TBD

Saginaw Valley Research and Ex. Center – Agriculture Education Center $ 1.2

Sheep Barn – Addition 2 – Sheep Lambing & Research Facility $ 0.4

State Police Post Development – Property Redevelopment $ 156.7

T.B. Simon Power Plant – Upgrade Utility Substation $ 24.0

Projects Authorized by the Board of Trustees for Planning (Arranged Alphabetically)

Breslin Center – Facilities Upgrades $ 28.0

Business College Complex – Graduate Pavilion $ 57.0

Data Center – Research and Business Continuity TBD

Engineering Building – Alterations to Suite 1515 $ 7.5

Food Processing and Innovation Center – New Construction and Renovation $ 5.3

Horticulture Gardens – Construct Welcome Center $ 2.2

Hubbard Hall – Exterior Masonry Repair $ 12.0

Packaging Building – First Floor Renovations $ 1.7

Wilson Road – Road Extension $ 10.2

Addressing the above projects within the next five-year timeframe is extremely important not only to the effectiveness of the academic programs but also to the operational efficiency of the institution. Finally, funding these projects is consistent with the University’s commitment to responsible stewardship of critical state resources. It will also ensure that the capital infrastructure is available to carry out our commitment to intellectual leadership in developing new knowledge and to conveying and applying that knowledge to students and the public in practical ways. VI. Capital Outlay Planning11 The capital outlay requests support programs that have strong national reputations, expanding research bases, and high enrollment demand that will sustain the University and its contributions to Michigan. Funding these requests will provide economic development in the State, now and in the long term. Our capital outlay top priority is the construction of a STEM teaching and learning facility to align with State and national priorities. Over the past ten years credit hours in STEM and STEM-related courses at MSU have increased by 40 percent. Construction of a new instructional facility focused on supporting teaching and learning in science, technology, engineering, and

11 See Appendix G for the State Fiscal Year 2017 Capital Outlay Project Request – Attachment B for the

STEM Teaching and Learning Facility.


24

mathematics (STEM) disciplines is necessary to continue this programmatic direction. Such a facility would address the continued State and national priority to educate increasing numbers of students in STEM disciplines. A new STEM Teaching and Learning facility would include modern wet bench teaching laboratories that incorporate active learning principles, foster cross-disciplinary teaching and learning, and support developing and evolving changes in curriculum and its delivery. The facility would bring together a number of teaching laboratories that are currently dispersed across campus to create a central hub for STEM teaching and learning. New construction New construction is needed to support high-priority instructional and research programs ranging from the sciences to academic/administrative technology. As detailed above, MSU’s Capital Outlay request of a STEM Teaching and Learning facility is a priority for advancing STEM education on MSU’s campus. The facilities are needed to support current and future programmatic initiatives in the STEM disciplines including biomedical, biological and engineering sciences, computation and data sciences, water and energy and economic development of Michigan, now and in the long term.

Renovations and additions

Requests for renovations and/or additions address extensive programmatic and maintenance improvements required by buildings previously funded by the State. Renovations are needed to reconfigure space in order to support the work of the programs housed in those facilities, upgrades to building systems and current codes, and provisions for accessibility. In other cases, due to program requirements, condition, age and long-term value, renovation of an entire building is warranted.

Requests for major renovations and/or additions include the Plant Sciences-Bioeconomy, Biological Sciences and Music Facilities.

Major systems replacement

Current forecasts anticipate general fund facility, instructional and infrastructure needs of approximately $260 million over the next five years. In view of the extensive facility needs it faces, MSU has had to draw upon an increasing amount of internal university resources to address the most critical facility maintenance and programmatic requirements. Self-funding these capital improvements is not sustainable without impact on other programs.

The University seeks funding for more targeted and specific building systems maintenance and instructional space facility upgrades. Examples of systems in need of repair or replacement include roofing, windows, electrical, mechanical, chiller, refrigeration, steam, fire, security and barrier-free access. Instructional space upgrades today extend beyond simply replacing room infrastructure and


25

furnishings, and include new and expanded room layouts and more sophisticated technology installations to support a range of active learning environments.

VII. Conclusion

Today’s higher education marketplace focuses ever more tightly on value, an effect demonstrated every year by Michigan State University’s increasing applications for admissions and by post-graduation outcomes and employer validation. Michigan State University is poised to maintain and expand on its land-grant tradition, bringing the latest in science into practice across the state and around the world as it moves from land-grant to world-grant in its posture. Consistently ranked as a top 100 global university, Michigan State University is a leading edge, world-class university committed to Michigan with exemplary undergraduate and graduate education programs.

Michigan State University is a vital engine of Michigan’s prosperity, leaving an annual $5.4 billion economic footprint. Michigan State has a presence in every Michigan County, training physicians at 38 partner hospitals, operating 14 AgBioresearch centers from Benton Harbor to Saginaw to Escanaba. After graduation, Spartans become leaders, entrepreneurs, volunteers, and contributors to their communities, fulfilling the intent of our 19th-century founders. Currently, over 240,000 alumni reside in the state of Michigan. Additionally, Michigan State University has positioned itself to provide the state with the type of graduates employers demand and who drive economic growth in the 21st century. In fact, over the last ten years STEM-based student credit hours have increased by approximately 40 percent while non-STEM credit hours are approximately flat over the same period.

MSU requests recurring FY16 appropriations support for the general fund, MSU AgBioResearch (MABR), and MSU Extension (MSUE) sufficient to sustain FY15 programming levels and invest in Michigan’s economic future. The University operates within the context of long-term underfunding and growing enrollment demand, particularly within high-cost disciplines. It is essential that stable, predictable funding be provided to maintain higher quality academic programs and opportunity for Michigan students and to enhance the strategic strengths of MABR and MSUE.

Michigan State University is an institution founded on a dynamic balance between the theoretical and the practical, discovery and dissemination, knowing and being. Standing among the 60 great research institutions comprising the Association of American Universities, Michigan State is yet differentiated in its fidelity to each of its core land-grant values: quality, inclusiveness and connectivity. They are tightly linked and demonstrated in myriad ways, from the university’s roster of top scholars and programs to its diverse campus community to its many forms of local, regional and international engagement.

Fall 2011

Submitted by:

Appendix A: Mission Statement

MSU Mission Statement

The following statement was approved by the Board of Trustees on April 18, 2008

Michigan State University, a member of the Association of American Universities and one of the top 100 research universities in the world, was founded in 1855. We are an inclusive, academic community known for our traditionally strong academic disciplines and professional programs, and our liberal arts foundation. Our cross- and interdisciplinary enterprises connect the sciences, humanities, and professions in practical, sustainable, and innovative ways to address society’s rapidly changing needs.

As a public, research-intensive, land-grant university, funded in part by the State of Michigan, our mission is to advance knowledge and transform lives by:

• providing outstanding undergraduate, graduate, and professional education to promising, qualified students in order to prepare them to contribute fully to society as globally engaged citizen leaders

• conducting research of the highest caliber that seeks to answer questions and create solutions in order to expand human understanding and make a positive difference, both locally and globally

• advancing outreach, engagement, and economic development activities that are innovative, research-driven, and lead to a better quality of life for individuals and communities, at home and around the world

http://president.msu.edu/mission/

Appendix B: Campus Master Plan Update 2011

Fall 2011

Submitted by:

Michigan State University

Campus Master Plan Update 2011

December 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREFACE Purpose of the Campus Master Plan 2 Update Parameters and Process 2 Major Accomplishments since the 2007 Update 3 CAMPUS PLANNING PRINCIPLES Introduction 4 General Principles 4 Planning Principles related to Land Use and Facilities 4 Planning Principles related to Environmental Sustainability 5 Planning Principles related to Open Space 6 Planning Principles related to Parking 6 Planning Principles related to Circulation 6 Planning Principles related to Utility Infrastructure 7 LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS Programs and Facilities 8 Open Space and Landscape 16 Motorized and Non-motorized Circulation 40 UNIVERSITY ZONING ORDINANCE Certification 46 Table of Contents 47 Section I Statement of Purpose 48 Section 2 Effectiveness of Ordinance 48 Section 3 Authority of Board of Trustees 48 Section 4 Definitions 48 Section 5 General Regulations 49 Section 6 District Regulations 50 Zoning District Map 57 Protected Green Space 58

Campus Master Plan – Update 2011 Page 1

PREFACE PURPOSE OF THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN The Campus Master Plan provides a flexible framework for guiding the physical organization of the Michigan State University (MSU) campus. The plan is updated every five years to provide the university administration with a current and relevant decision making tool. This tool includes overarching Campus Planning Principles, specific system recommendations, and the University Zoning Ordinance. In addition to the Campus Master Plan, numerous planning documents are required to guide campus development. These documents should be referenced during all planning and design efforts, and include but are not limited to:

• Capital Outlay Request • Just-in-Time Priorities • Residential and Hospitality Services Strategic Plan • Utility Master Plans • Storm Water Master Plan • ADA 2010 Transition Plan • Energy Transition Plan

UPDATE PARAMETERS AND PROCESS While refreshed from cover to cover, major changes incorporated in the Campus Master Plan – Update 2011 include an expanded section on open space and landscape recommendations, incorporation of a new mixed-use classification to the University Zoning Ordinance, and various updates to the Campus Planning Principles providing a stronger sustainable ethos. The following resources and initiatives were utilized to update the Campus Master Plan:

• The process to update the Campus Master Plan was initiated at the November 2010 Board of Trustees joint work session.

• Programmatic and facility priorities were compiled by the Office of Facilities Planning and Space Management in alignment with the university’s Capital Outlay Request SFY13 for the State of Michigan.

• Campus planning recommendations were developed by technical teams were reviewed and assimilated into the update by a steering committee comprised of faculty, staff, and student representatives.

• Numerous public forums enabled input from both on- and off-campus constituencies. • Four public open houses were held in May and September 2011. • A web site was established for posting draft material and facilitating public comment

at www.masterplan.msu.edu. • The Board of Trustees were briefed and provided input at their June 2011 retreat, and

a joint work session in October 2011.


MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE THE 2007 UPDATE Over the past five years, the Campus Master Plan – Update 2007 guided the accomplishment of the following:

• Major building projects completed or under construction include: Wells Hall Addition, Cyclotron Office and High Bay Addition, Research Complex Engineering Expansion, Eli & Edythe Broad Art Museum, Bott Building for Nursing Education & Research, Plant Sciences Addition, Skandalaris Football Center, Wharton Center Expansion, MSU Surplus Store & Recycling Center, and FRIB (Facility for Rare Isotope Beams. Overall, new campus construction totaled approximately 1.0 million GSF (gross square feet).

• Completion of the Farm Lane Underpass project. • Close adherence to the University Zoning Ordinance, with only 7 projects requiring a

zoning variance. • Compliance with the Campus Planning Principles addressing smart growth (i.e.,

maximizing the utilization of university land and conserving resources through compact campus development). Representative projects include the Wells Hall, Plant Sciences, and Cyclotron Office Additions.

• Five major enhancements to the campus open space system including: 1) the George J. and Sally A. Perles Plaza, 2) new residential open space north of Snyder Phillips Hall, 3) new academic open space north of Kedzie Hall, 4), reclaimed river floodplain through the demolition of University Village Apartments, and 5) a diverse collection of high-quality sculptures through the Public Art on Campus program.

• Receipt of a Bronze Bicycle Friendly University Award from the League of American Bicyclists. Today more than 50% of campus roads have bike lanes.

• Numerous advancements to the campus’ storm water management techniques including approval for an alternative approach to post-construction storm water controls by the MDEQ (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality) that will improve campus-wide Clean Water Act compliance.

• Receipt of the Governor’s Traffic Safety Advisory Commission’s Richard H. Austin 2006 Outstanding Contributions to Traffic and Safety Award. Traffic accidents continue to decline primarily resultant from the removal of on-street parking and the Wilson Road traffic circles. Traffic accidents have been reduced by 30% since 2001.


CAMPUS PLANNING PRINCIPLES INTRODUCTION The university is committed to a comprehensive and continuous land use planning process that results in a flexible framework to guide future decision making. The university will consider the use of resources from an environmental, regulatory, operational, economic, historic and cultural perspective in support of its teaching, research, and outreach mission. The following planning principles will guide future planning for, and development, on the Michigan State University campus. The principles are organized in the following categories: General Principles, Land Use and Facilities, Environmental Sustainability, Open Space, Parking, Circulation, and Utility Infrastructure.

GENERAL PRINCIPLES • Arrange the campus’ buildings, open space, circulation and utility systems to:

– establish positive interactions between academic, research, outreach, cultural, and operational activities;

– protect and strengthen the campus as a living-learning resource integral to the university’s mission;

– protect and enhance its aesthetic beauty; – enhance environmental stewardship; – minimize energy impacts and increase/retain energy efficiencies; and, – optimize safety and risk management.

PLANNING PRINCIPLES RELATED TO LAND USE AND FACILITIES • Organize the campus in logical districts of compatible land uses. • Implement compact campus development to achieve the following benefits:

– preserve and protect existing natural areas and systems to support teaching and research; – conserve land and maximize land productivity; – protect contiguous agricultural teaching and research land; – encourage social interactions and vitality; – encourage collaboration, partnering, and interdisciplinary connections; – reinforce ties between research and undergraduate teaching; – control utility, transportation, parking, and infrastructure costs; – enhance functional efficiencies; – maximize efficient energy use; and, – minimize utility distribution extensions, which are less efficient and more costly to

maintain. • Provide intramural recreation fields in locations that balance accessibility for both on- and

off-campus participants. • Protect and enhance campus open space providing an appropriate balance (qualitative and

quantitative) to the built environment.


• Protect the land south of Mount Hope Road from development to support the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources’ teaching, research, and outreach mission.

• Favor reuse, renovation, and repurposing existing buildings after carefully assessing

programmatic alignment, functionality, long-term Just-In-Time (JIT) maintenance needs, historic significance, location, energy efficiency, and replacement costs.

• Organize the arrangement and design of campus buildings and exterior spaces to encourage

human interaction and foster a sense of shared community among the university’s diverse population. This may include, for example, incorporating “transitional spaces” outside of classrooms for pre- and post-class collaboration and “blended spaces” where food service, study space, and general meeting resources coexist.

• Design new buildings and renovations to be architecturally compatible with the best features

of existing adjacent buildings and to be harmonious with their contextual surroundings.

• Maximize flexibility in the design of new and renovated space to accommodate changing needs and functions over time.

• Recognize historically significant aspects of the campus and the heritage of the campus as a

park and as a living and learning laboratory. • Acknowledge that the campus is part of the larger surrounding community. Build compatible

land use relationships and circulation patterns. • Consolidate support service facilities into the Services District as defined by the University

Zoning Ordinance. • Organize land uses, facilities, and infrastructure to encourage physical activity.

PLANNING PRINCIPLES RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY • Minimize environmental impacts and maximize resource conservation through prudent and

compact land use, protection of sensitive environmental systems, and by incorporating low-impact development guidelines.

• Minimize negative impacts to the water quality of the Red Cedar River Watershed;

incorporate Best Management Practices for storm water. • Acknowledge the intrinsic value of biodiversity and enhance natural system integrity by

creating, restoring, and maintaining large block natural areas and improving their interconnections.

• Provide a suite of transportation options that maximize the movement of people and minimize

the movement of cars thus reducing vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions. • Minimize greenhouse gas emissions

• Continuously pursue building and utility systems that encourage the use of renewable

resources and decreases the production of waste and hazardous materials.


PLANNING PRINCIPLES RELATED TO OPEN SPACE • Protect and extend the park-like character of the historic Circle Campus in order to reinforce

and enhance the university’s distinctive physical identity. • Enhance the landscape quality south of the Red Cedar River. • Promote efficient land use that protects existing, and creates new, green space. • Protect, maintain, and develop the campus as an arboretum to support the university’s

teaching, research, and outreach mission. • Provide opportunities for academic and social interaction. • Provide a variety of open spaces that accommodate the full range of outdoor activity, for

example, large athletic fields to intimate spaces for personal reflection and meditation. • Preserve and protect existing natural areas and enhance their interconnectivity. • Integrate public art appropriate to surrounding context (excluding Natural Areas).

PLANNING PRINCIPLES RELATED TO PARKING • Safely and efficiently meet the parking needs of faculty, staff, students, and visitors. • Integrate parking facilities into the campus setting in an aesthetically pleasing manner

consistent with its park-like setting. • Utilize a variety of parking resources including perimeter parking, surface lots and parking

garages; emphasizing parking on the campus perimeter. • Provide conveniently located barrier free spaces across campus. • Reclaim surface lots for green space and future building sites when appropriate. • Relocate parking that contributes to unsafe traffic and pedestrian conditions. • Minimize the loss of open space for small, inefficient surface parking lots. • Connect the campus transit system to major parking facilities.

PLANNING PRINCIPLES RELATED TO CIRCULATION • Emphasize personal safety in the planning and design of the circulation system. • Design all roads as complete streets (designed and operated to enable safe, attractive, and

comfortable access and travel for all legal users). • Provide a safe, efficient, and effective transportation network that enhances the overall

quality of life on the campus.


• Incorporate traffic calming measures where appropriate. • Plan and design for the following circulation priorities:

– Pedestrians first; – bicycles and other forms of non-motorized transportation; – mass transit and service vehicles; and, – private vehicles last.

• Plan with the safety of persons with disabilities in mind. • Reduce private vehicular traffic in the academic and residential districts. • Effectively integrate with the regional transportation system. • Establish a coordinated bicycle system including: bike lanes within roadways, dedicated

pathways and/or shared-use pathways, and convenient and appropriately sized storage facilities where appropriate.

• Enable an effective and efficient mass transit system including developing neighborhood

campus transit centers to gain transit efficiencies.

PLANNING PRINCIPLES RELATED TO UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE • Develop campus buildings and infrastructure to achieve efficient energy utilization.

• Use centralized utility systems wherever feasible to maximize production efficiencies and to

minimize life-cycle operational costs

• Establish consolidated distribution corridors that co-locate utilities and accommodate maintenance with minimal campus disruptions.

• Provide adequate protection and security for critical system components.

• Provide redundancy for steam, electric, water, and communication utilities.

• Enable resource conservation and management through appropriate system design and

controls.

• Prepare for developing technologies and their integration into the campus infrastructure

• Implement practices, install systems, and develop procedures that prolong the capacity of the

power plant, increase reliability, protect health and wellness, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions while managing affordability.



LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES Projected Building Needs Priority near-term needs (0-5 year planning horizon) emphasize the research enterprise and facilities that address academic and student support service needs. This is consistent with the university’s strategic plan to grow sponsored research, its standing as a top research-intensive institution, and to support greater opportunities for engaged student learning and participation in research. The projects range from comprehensive renovation to new construction and building additions. It also includes significant renovation to a number of our campus residence halls consistent with the Residential and Hospitality Services Strategic Plan. Longer-term projections (5-20 year planning horizon) are primarily based on estimated program growth or desired consolidation of support services. The projects range from comprehensive renovation to new construction and building additions. Another key factor in long-term planning is the fact that the university has an aging physical plant that will require investment in renovation of these existing facilities or consideration for demolition and replacement. The primary criteria for placement on this list are buildings constructed over 20 years ago with no major comprehensive renovations in the last 20 years. In summary, the projected short-term building needs represent approximately 800,000 GSF (gross square feet) of new construction and 1.9 million GSF of potential renovations and alterations to existing facilities. The long-term building needs represent approximately 500,000 GSF of new construction, 500,000 GSF of potential renovations and alterations, and nearly 800,000 GSF associated with the aging physical plant.


The following is a more detailed presentation of projected building needs consistent with the Capital Outlay SFY13 submission to the State of Michigan and near term needs based on current program planning:

Project Name Description 2011 GSF master plan

Building Type

Near Term (0-5 year planning horizon) Bio Engineering Facility Construct building at South Campus for

teaching and research program expansion and need

50,000 Academic

Greenhouse Expansion Addition at South Campus range primarily forresearch

30,000 Academic

Plant Biology Building Comprehensive renovation for teaching and research

190,000 Academic

Greenhouse Renovation Select renovation of east/west greenhouses for teaching and research

176,000 Academic

Music Building Addition Addition to existing building for program expansion and need

60,000 Academic

Music & Music Practice Comprehensive renovation for improved program support

103,000 Academic

Chittenden Hall Comprehensive renovation for the Graduate School

13,500 Academic

Natural Science Building Comprehensive renovation for improved program support

251,000 Academic

Clinical Center B Comprehensive renovation for research 77,000 Academic Animal Care Facilities Renovation and expansion for research

support 97,000 Academic

Giltner Hall Renovation and high priority maintenance for teaching and research

251,000 Academic

Erickson Hall Vertical expansion for research expansion andneed

19,000 Academic

Shaw Lane Power Plant Comprehensive renovation for academic services support

43,000 Academic

Student Services Building Comprehensive renovation for student support services

120,000 Academic

Engineering Research Addition to building 51,000 Academic Interdisciplinary Science & Technology

Construct building for interdisciplinary teaching and research expansion and need

225,000 Academic

Biological Safety Labs Construct modular labs at South Campus for research

40,000 Academic

Data Center Construct building for university operations 113,000 Support MSU Health Team Facility Construct building to support the delivery of

patient services 160,000 Academic

Chilled Water Plant Support cooling needs of future south academic development

20,000 Support

Cyclotron Phase III Construct addition for FRIB program need 55,000 Academic Armstrong Hall Comprehensive renovation of building 115,000 Housing Bryan Hall Comprehensive renovation of building 116,000 Housing Butterfield Hall Comprehensive renovation of building 103,000 Housing Kellogg Center Phased Renovation of building 232,000 Support

Total Gross Square Feet: 2,710,500

Project Name Description 2011 GSF master plan

BuildingType

Long Term (5-20 year planning horizon) Child Development Center Construct building for increased capacity 20,000 Support College of Business Construct addition for instructional and

research program need 97,000 Academic

College of Human Medicine Renovation for consolidation and educational program need

180,000 Academic

College of Osteopathic Medicine Construct building for expansion and educational program need

173,000 Academic

College of Social Science Additional space for academic and research expansion

11,000 Academic

International Center Additional office and meeting space 7,000 Academic Intramural Sports & Recreation Additions and renovation for fitness space 96,000 Athletics Kellogg Center Construct hotel tower 24,000 Support Library Expansion Addition at the Main Library 40,000 Academic Support Service Consolidation Construct building for Physical Plant

consolidation TBD Support

Telecom/Transportation Construct building for telecommunication and transportation services consolidation

36,000 Support

University Storage Construct building for storage needs 90,000 Support Veterinary Medicine Vertical expansion above Oncology for

research 35,000 Academic

Water Treatment Facility Potentially construct reservoir 10,000 Support Union Building Phased renovation 209,000 Support Total Gross Square Feet: 1,028,000 Building Opportunity Framework Plan This plan illustrates where future buildings can be assimilated into the campus context while reinforcing the Campus Planning Principles and University Zoning Ordinance. As such, the plan does not dictate where and when growth will occur, rather it identifies development opportunities that can be evaluated to address specific programmatic needs when a project is identified and funding secured. Each numbered site is measured and a potential building gross square foot yield is estimated by incorporating zoning allowances and important contextual features. Where development opportunity land areas are too large and architectural speculation is not definable, a simple planning metric (floor area ratio) is assigned to estimate future programmatic yield. Based on this assessment the following summarizes the future amount of building opportunities for the campus lands north of Mount Hope Road:

Zoning Designation

Estimated Gross Potential Estimated Net Potential North Academic District 304,900 GSF 244,900 GSF Central Academic District 3,124,735 GSF 2,955,518 GSF South Academic District 2,986,700 GSF 2,977,486 GSF West Academic District 4,345,500 GSF 3,147,053 GSF Athletic/Recreation District 279,000 GSF 279,000 GSF Service District 1,025,000 GSF 906,144 GSF Residential District 860,800 GSF 701,058 GSF Total Opportunity 12,926,635 GSF 11,211,159 GSF


The estimated net potential represents future building opportunities less any existing building demolition. The campus has historically added an average of approximately 2.0 million gross square feet (MGSF) every decade. At that rate, the net opportunities support approximately 56 years of future growth assuming each site is developed to its optimal capacity. Building Opportunity Framework Plan Beyond 20-year Planning Horizon Building opportunities anticipated beyond the 20-year planning horizon represent projects requiring significant redevelopment, demolition or program relocation to optimize the use of land resources. While these sites are not likely to be developed in the near term, they need to be part of long-range planning efforts. Storm Water Management Campus land is reserved to provide future storm water management facilities that will address municipal storm water regulations under the Clean Water Act. Individual building projects are evaluated by the University Engineer and a technical work group to assess its ability to meet current storm water management regulations on site. If a project cannot meet its requirements on site due to existing development constraints or other unique project attributes, then the university has the option of utilizing a sub watershed facility in another location on campus per Michigan Department of Environmental Quality agreements. Two important Campus Master Plan recommendations will help reduce the campus’ impact on the Red Cedar River. First, the removal/relocation of Parking Ramp #2 (Auditorium Road) will convert a sizeable amount of land back to its function as floodplain. Second, the removal and relocation of approximately 1,100 surface parking spaces in the Central Academic District will remove an existing land use that has significant negative impacts both in terms of storm water quantity and quality.


OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE THE CAMPUS AS AN ARBORETUM In 1980, President John A. Hannah remarked, “Long ago it was planned that the campus should be an outdoor laboratory, with all the variety of trees, shrubs, and woody plants that could be made to grow in Michigan, labeled and tagged not only for students in botany and silviculture and landscape architecture, but for all students and faculty and people in the community.” President Hannah was reflecting on Professor William Beal’s 1872 proposal for a campus arboretum. Professor Beal hoped this would lead to a more formalized campus tree planting program. At the time, trees were grown in an arboretum located between what are today, Mary Mayo and Campbell Halls; from there they were transplanted across campus. Professor Beal conducted the first inventory of campus trees in the 1880’s and began the labeling program identifying trees by common name, scientific name, family, and geographic origin, a program which continues today (Telewski 2010). As envisioned by Professor Beal, the campus arboretum serves as a valuable resource for teaching, research, and outreach. The MSU campus is renowned and beloved by students, faculty, staff, alumni, and visitors. As such, detailed recommendations are required to protect and enhance its open space and landscape aesthetic; maintaining an appropriate balance with the ever evolving built environment. The Campus Master Plan provides a unifying vision for the campus open space and landscape aesthetic. It offers a flexible framework that guides planning design and maintenance, while allowing latitude in the design of individual projects. The plan directs stewardship and preservation of the historic campus park and guides future enhancement of the built environment, including the campus as an arboretum for educational, research, and public outreach. PROTECTED GREEN SPACE Based on the detailed classification of the open space system, the following areas are deemed sensitive to development and are subject to protection from any new buildings or pavement under the regulations of the University Zoning Ordinance. Component 1 areas identify and protect landscape areas that have an ecological or historic aspect. Component 2 areas identify and protect green space that provides a unique programmatic or research land use.


CAMPUS-WIDE CONSIDERATIONS Education, Research, Conservation, and Public Outreach GOAL: Develop the campus landscape to support the university’s educational and research mission, and to promote learning outside the classroom. OBJECTIVES:

1. Protect and enhance a diverse collection of woody plant material which is tracked in a plant records database (BG-BASE) and made available to the university community and public via a web interface.

2. Protect, enhance, and expand existing demonstration, teaching, and research areas.

3. Protect the collection from degradation and construction impacts. 4. Identify existing or developing green spaces and landscapes with a high intrinsic

educational or research value. 5. Encourage the planting of both wild origin as well as cultivated origin plant

material in the collection. 6. Provide open spaces of various sizes for student, employee, and visitor enjoyment

(public events, concerts, passive recreation, plazas, personal reflection, etc.). 7. Maintain a campus-wide plant labeling system providing interpretive plant labels

on selected specimens in the collection. 8. Coordinate with long term utility planning. 9. Respond to degrading effects of cyclical plant diseases and pests.

Campus Image GOAL: Maintain and enhance the campus’ high-quality image and park-like setting. OBJECTIVES:

1. Maintain a high-quality image that reflects institutional values and provides a pleasant experience for students, faculty, staff, and visitors.

2. Preserve, enhance, and protect the qualities of distinctive and high quality open spaces from inappropriate new campus development or other negative impacts.

3. Plan new building and open space improvements jointly and with the same degree of importance to ensure each new investment elevates the quality of the campus aesthetic.

4. Convey a distinct image, unified character, and high-quality impression at all major vehicular and pedestrian campus entrances.

5. Prioritize and consolidate campus beautification investments to improve the campus’ landscape character south of the Red Cedar River.


6. Provide a variety of landscape typologies and open space appropriate to the major campus land use districts (e.g., academic, residential, athletic, and service).

7. Visually screen parking and service areas.

Historic Stewardship GOAL: Preserve and enhance the campus’ historic landscape features. Maintain a landscape design that reflects institutional values, honors historic design, and demonstrates a respect for campus heritage. OBJECTIVES:

1. Protect areas that contribute to the overall historic context to ensure they are not conspicuously altered.

2. Protect trees of historic value and propagate them for future planting (MSU Heritage Tree Program administered by Campus Planning and Administration in coordination with the Beaumont Nursery)

3. Preserve important historic landscape systems, patterns, and features. 4. Utilize the landscape for historic, archaeological, and anthropological studies. 5. Strengthen the Heritage Tree Program to replace indigenous material. 6. Protect State Champion Trees, MSU Commemorative Trees, and MSU Heritage

Trees. 7. Refresh and reinvest in the older campus gardens. 8. Develop a tree evaluation, removal, and mitigation policy.

Campus Safety GOAL: Provide a safe and secure environment for vehicular (motorized and non-motorized) and pedestrian corridors. OBJECTIVES:

1. Coordinate streetscape plantings with street lights to afford safe roadway and walkway illumination. Coordinate tree spacing/location to provide adequate light at maturity; trees spacing shall “gap” at street and walkway light fixture locations.

2. Provide adequate sight lines for pedestrians and motor vehicles at roadway intersections, driveways, boulevard cuts, and pedestrian crosswalks per appropriate engineering standards and in balance with aesthetic detail.

3. Place appropriate tree species along walkways and adjacent to bus stops that will not create hazards (from leaf, fruit, or litter drop) to pedestrians or persons with physical disabilities.

4. Avoid plantings that provide unsafe hiding places. Thin out overgrowth in areas along walkways that can visually isolate pedestrians. Assess building entrances, eliminating areas that can mask potentially dangerous activities and hiding places.


Environmental Sustainability GOAL: Create a landscape that incorporates and embraces environmentally-sustainable practices including low impact development and storm water best management practices. OBJECTIVES:

1. Restrict high-maintenance ornamental plantings especially annuals and perennials to priority landscape areas.

2. Minimize landscape areas that require irrigation; where required utilize an efficient system appropriate to plant material needs.

3. Enhance plant species diversity to avoid large-scale damage and loss from diseases and pests and to reduce pesticide use.

4. Emphasize the use of native/sustainable plants that are drought and disease resistant; group plants with similar water needs.

5. Protect campus areas from development that can provide storm water management coordinated with the university’s Storm Water Master Plan.

6. Utilize plants that help reduce energy use and that mitigate “heat island” affects. 7. Remove, eliminate, and discontinue planting species that have proven to be

invasive in the campus landscape. Maintain only minimal representation in the collection for teaching and research purposes, but monitor for spread (ie: Norway Maple, Acer platanoides).

8. Mitigate detrimental or uncomfortable wind patterns with appropriate plant material. Utilize evergreens selectively to establish windbreaks where necessitated by architectural massing.

9. Coordinate plantings with snow removal and storage plans. 10. Employ Best Management Practices (BMP) for storm water management; manage

storm water on site wherever possible per current regulatory requirements. 11. Collect and reuse rain water; discharge roof water drainage onto lawns where

appropriate. Resource Management GOAL: Balance landscape priorities with maintenance requirements to optimize the use of resources (people, equipment, and funding). OBJECTIVES:

1. Limit the frequency and size of elite landscapes to those specific locations with very strong historic and photographic qualities.

2. Limit the use of annuals and bulbs (unless used for naturalizing) to Elite Landscape Areas or movable planters.


3. Limit the use of perennials to priority landscapes, gardens, plazas, and major building entrances as directed by Engineering and Architectural Services Landscape Architects.

4. Utilize a landscape mowing strip along building walls when appropriate to minimize maintenance.

5. Promote the use of plant species that do not require irrigation beyond establishment.

DISTRICT RECOMMENDATIONS Historic and Historic Contributing INTRODUCTION The park-like setting that students, alumni, and visitors endear is directly influenced by the historic campus landscape(s). The West Circle Drive area from Grand River Avenue to the Red Cedar River and from the Beal Entrance to the Lab Row building group is the site of the original built campus founded in 1855. The prairie-style landscape and informal grouping of buildings provides a picturesque campus park unique among American college campuses. The trees and undulating lawns within the West Circle Drive area were recognized by O.C. Simonds as “sacred space” (circa 1905). DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Preserve the “Oak Opening” and prairie-style planting patterns of sun and shade. • Incorporate interpretive displays that compare historic and current campus maps. • Preserve and reinforce the historic context by utilizing native plant populations,

maintaining historic vegetative patterns, and protecting Heritage Trees; strengthen the MSU Heritage Tree Program to replace indigenous material.

• Emphasize the use of straight species, including some of known wild source (vs. commercially promoted varieties) in designated areas and provide tree labels per academic and public needs.

• Consider plants popular during the historic period associated with the adjacent architectural context, rather than modern cultivars.

• Initiate supplemental plantings that will replace existing canopy with same or similar plant species, except where impossible (e.g., Fraxinus).

• Protect the Beal Botanical Garden, including its place of origin; Sleepy Hollow. • Preserve important views and axial relationships wherein the landscaping honors and

accents historic monuments and buildings. • Minimize additional impervious surfaces. • Prohibit lawn parking to protect plant health. • Provide APPA (The Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers)

maintenance level 3 or higher practices.


Park-Like Academic INTRODUCTION The academic districts of campus, comprised of a diverse collection of trees and shrubs, lend themselves to supporting teaching and research activities for students and visitors alike. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Provide a diverse mixture of plant species that support academic teaching requirements.

• Use plant material to create a pleasant scale and aesthetic environment along major pedestrian corridors; especially those adjacent to major roadways.

• Consider habitat and food needs to encourage wildlife diversity. • Allow but restrict areas for lawn parking. • Provide APPA maintenance level 3 or higher practices.

North Academic District The Prairie School patterning of “sun openings” is prevalent in the North Academic District. This concept consists of creating alternating areas of deep shade and bright, sunlit lawns that are reminiscent of the indigenous savannah that once covered much of the northern Midwest. The trees and undulating lawns within the Circle Campus area were recognized by O.C. Simonds as “sacred space” (circa 1905) and remains so today.

• Maintain the historic informal context and Prairie School landscape patterns reminiscent of the oak opening.

• Highlight the major pedestrian entrances along Grand River Avenue with woody plant material exhibiting seasonal interest.

• Recapture floodplain along the river through building relocation and demolition over time, and the removal of invasive species (e.g. Honeysuckle Lonicera and Buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica) in this corridor, replacing with native plant populations.

• Minimize the increase of, or where possible reduce, impervious surface area through careful future development including low impact development (LID) design techniques.

• Maintain the grove of tall canopy trees at the Beal, Abbot, and Farm Lane entrances to provide a calming transition into campus.

• Use an informal street tree planting pattern around West Circle Drive and along the Beal Entrance.

• Use a formal street tree pattern along East Circle Drive, Auditorium Road and Physics Road.

Central Academic District The extensive roadway network and large building massing negatively impact the campus aesthetic, and subsequently, human comfort. Much of what a pedestrian perceives is strongly influenced by the adjacent roadways and architectural design. Therefore a strong streetscape and front yard landscape is essential to mitigate these elements and to properly transition the


landscape scale from the roadway to the building entrances. Special focus should be on providing a pleasant experience and sense of scale along pedestrian walkways.

• Preserve and enhance existing garden/natural areas including the river corridor, Peoples Park(defined by the Red Cedar River, Wells Hall, the International Center and Erickson Hall), Horticultural Demonstration Gardens, Michigan 4-H Children’s Garden, Lewis Landscape Arboretum, and the gardens/courtyards adjacent to the Wharton Center, Chemistry, Natural Resources, and Engineering.

• Use a formal street tree pattern and stagger canopy trees on both sides of adjacent pedestrian walkways. The monumental roadway scale influences the landscape and human comfort, demanding large and stable woody plants. Minimize the use of fussy and maintenance intensive perennials within and along the roadway corridor.

• Establish groves of tall canopy trees where appropriate (areas unencumbered by infrastructure).

• Utilize native evergreens to screen railroad tracks from Trowbridge Road extension and south campus residence halls as part of the Walk Across America plantings located south of Trowbridge Road.

• Introduce smaller-scaled landscapes that encourage personal interaction. • Continue planning for the relocation of the large surface parking lots along Shaw

Lane and the creation of a new central campus green space per the Campus Master Plan.

South Academic District The district is defined by large architectural structures that struggle to provide a sense of place or a pleasant relationship with the pedestrian realm. This requires that the landscape mitigate for this dominance; creating a comfortable pedestrian environment. The landscape needs to be strengthened to better unify the visual aesthetic and to provide places for social interaction, academic collaboration, and personal relaxation.

• Establish open spaces that help organize the district’s existing and future buildings. • Provide a high quality streetscape and front lawn along Service Road. • Establish a strong campus image along Hagadorn Road. • Develop a priority campus vehicular entrance at Service Road and Mt. Hope with

appropriate signage and landscaping. Park-Like Residential INTRODUCTION Approximately 16,000 students call the university’s seven residential neighborhoods home. The landscape design for the neighborhoods must address a wide variety of issues including: scale transition, screening of service functions, providing room for informal recreation, and more intimate areas for relaxation and mental restoration.


DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS • Maintain a park-like aesthetic that is dominated by expansive lawn areas for

recreation blended with a strong pattern of canopy trees/evergreens, strong drifts of shrub beds, and greater introduction of more interesting woody ornamentals.

• Provide a hierarchy of open space typologies that accommodate a variety of informal recreation and social opportunities. Provide areas for sitting, gathering, and personal interaction.

• Encourage year-round ornamental aesthetics (e.g., textures, colors, scents, accents, etc.)

• Where applicable, relate the landscape design to the residential college initiative. • Enhance the student experience by promoting learning & development through

interaction. • Provide appropriately-sized plants to soften architectural scale. • Utilize plantings carefully to prevent hiding places near building entrances and low

windows. • Eliminate attractive (children) toxics (e.g., Taxus & Convallaria). • Manage storm water on site or within the contiguous residential district; use collected

rainwater for irrigation. • Emphasize landscape aesthetics at major building entrances; utilize perennials at

building front doors especially facilities with high summer use. • Restrict the use of annuals for special events in approved planters approved by EAS

(Engineering and Architectural Services) landscape architects. • Mitigate detrimental or uncomfortable wind patterns around the residence halls with

appropriate plant material (typically due to architectural massing) • Provide APPA maintenance level 3 or higher practices.

Front Yard The front yard is more about “curb appeal” and providing a transition in scale and aesthetic detail from the larger campus and active circulation corridors to the residential neighborhood and individual buildings.

• Provide a park-like setting comprised of extensive lawn panels, canopy trees, evergreens, and shrub beds conducive with the neighborhood’s historic context (i.e., context differs between the West Circle Neighborhood and those in the South Neighborhood).

• Minimize the use of maintenance-intensive planting beds. • Provide a transition of landscape scale from the roadway down to the building

entrances. • Buffer residential units from adjacent roadways through strategic plant choices,

placement, and density. • Utilize storm water management techniques that maintain a clean visual aesthetic

(e.g., passive infiltration, storm drains, small rain gardens, etc.).


Back Yard The back yard is analogous to our back yard at home. It is where the students go to chill out or burn off extra energy through informal exercise, like tossing a ball or throwing a Frisbee. It is where one can decompress and relax and where the landscape is brought down to a more intimate scale and details are attuned to the senses.

• Create a generally open and park-like setting with a few developed plazas/patios and individual seating areas.

• Incorporate more plant material variety with a nice amount of seasonal interest. Consider flower aesthetics, branching aesthetics, understory and ornamentals trees, and shrub beds where appropriate.

• Preserve open areas for recreation; typically informal and non-organized. Locate volleyball and basketball courts in these areas.

• Incorporate areas for the social gathering of small groups. • Provide semi-private areas for personal reflection. • Facilitate connections to academic programs where appropriate (e.g., residential

colleges). Provide living/learning opportunities. • Incorporate small rain gardens, public art, landscape furnishings, and recreational

amenities. Main Building Entrance and Vehicular Drop Off The main building entrances are important in establishing a proper image for the university and its residential life program. First impressions are made here; requiring an appropriate level of landscape quality throughout the seasons.

• Provide a pleasant landscape setting utilizing perennials and woody plants exhibiting a variety of seasonal interest.

• Coordinate with Residential and Hospitality Services (RHS) on balancing the extent of these areas with available maintenance budgets.

• Consider moveable planters with annual color and seasonal variety. • Landscape upgrades may also be warranted at building entrances, other than the main

front door, that regularly handle large volumes of pedestrian traffic. Front doors are often not the most utilized entrances.

Neighborhood Food and Engagement Centers Outdoor plaza/patio space adjacent to the neighborhood food and engagement centers supports the underlying concept of bringing people together for social and academic interaction. Properly accessorize these portals to the residential neighborhoods to encourage active use, assist in wayfinding, and to support the RHS mission.

• Provide a comfortable setting that encourages interaction. • Create a pedestrian-scaled landscape that extends the interior functions into the

outdoors and that provides a transition from the park-like landscape to the building entrance. Consider these as major building entrances in their design detailing.


• Amplify landscape details including texture, contrast, and seasonal interest. Park-Like Service INTRODUCTION The Campus Master Plan strategizes consolidating support services south of the Canadian Northern railroad tracks. The landscape should reinforce this area as a vital part of the overall campus, while acknowledging its purpose and functions. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Establish a simple, functional, and easily maintainable landscape focused on enhancing the visual aesthetic.

• Use plants tolerant of extreme conditions. • Utilize lawn panels, canopy trees, and evergreens to soften the utilitarian architectural

context, screen service areas, and provide pedestrian scale to walkways. • Utilize an informal street tree planting approach on Service Road sympathetic to the

existence of driveways, walkways, and utility distribution lines. • Buffer and screen loading docks and large parking lots from street views. • Establish plantings along the Farm Lane roadway consistent with this major campus

entrance with heavy visitor use. • Restrict the use of perennials, annuals, and bulbs to office/building entrances that

receive extensive visitor traffic (e.g., MSU Bakers, Surplus Store and Recycling). • Provide APPA maintenance level 4 or higher practices.

Athletic and Recreation INTRODUCTION Intercollegiate athletics and intramural recreation activities require a landscape capable of handling large volumes of people, heavy foot traffic, and various activities that can stress the landscape (e.g., event parking on intramural fields). While the venues themselves require a very utilitarian design, this must be balanced with the fact that they are also gateways for hundreds of thousands of visitors each year, and as such, must present a high quality aesthetic that properly represents the university. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Meeting the functional needs for recreation and athletic events takes precedence over academic and research needs in these areas.

• Provide a landscape that is simple, functional, and clean. • Enhance the visitor experience with seasonal landscaping at venue entrances and

developed gathering areas. • Choose plants for drought tolerance. • Minimize wildlife attractants. • Allow, but protect, the landscape and irrigation system from special event parking.


• Maintain the existing park-like landscape, utilizing plants that will mature to a large size; adequate to balance against the large building masses.

• Provide a pleasing and safe landscape that supports large crowd fluctuations. • Consider seasonal interest geared toward the athletic schedule of the sports played

within each facility. • Provide APPA maintenance level 1 practices.

River Corridor INTRODUCTION The Red Cedar River is an iconic campus element that is a core attribute of our beloved campus park. It is an active natural system; constantly changing as the water’s erosive powers work against the banks. A large collection of Ash trees inhabit the river corridor and with the ongoing destruction by the Emerald Ash Borer, most of these will not survive. The university needs to reinvest in the river corridor from a historic, cultural, aesthetic, and environmental perspective. A report commissioned by the Physical Plant was prepared addressing this reinvestment entitled Natural Areas – 2006 Riverbank Stabilization Study dated February 2007. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Protect and enhance the river corridor recognizing it as one of the most important open spaces and landscape features on campus.

• Refer to the report commissioned by the Physical Plant entitled Natural Areas – 2006 Riverbank Stabilization Study dated February 2007.

• Survey species, eradicate invasive plants, and utilize native populations for future plantings.

• Protect and enhance the river corridor as a natural system and minimize attempts to manicure its look.

• Balance river bank protection vs. water access and plant accordingly; maintain and protect the rapids area and associated access points.

• Utilize native plant populations. • Minimize secluded spaces and create openings as needed. • Minimize future pumping from river water source for irrigation. • Establish a riparian buffer (no mowing area) to promote storm water infiltration,

minimize maintenance, and enhance wildlife habitat. • Provide plantings for wildlife. • Coordinate landscape with the Storm Water Master Plan and NPDES Permit. • Consider reclaiming the river’s floodplain when redevelopment opportunities arise. • Provide APPA maintenance level 4 or higher practices.


Signature Landscapes INTRODUCTION Signature landscapes are focal points in the campus landscape. They vary in size and purpose and are typically associated with a heightened design aesthetic, utilize high-quality materials, are often associated with public art, fountains, or historic features, include irrigation, and demand elevated maintenance standards and practices. They are important for providing places to encourage community interaction and can be considered as eddies within the larger campus park wherein people can slow down and enjoy a more intimate sense of scale. The signature landscapes are comprised of both Elite and Priority plazas, gardens, and landscapes. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Provide a high level of design quality, aesthetic appeal, and maintenance activity that represents the importance of these areas to the university’s public image and community use.

• Limit the use of annuals to Elite landscape locations. Limit the use of perennials to Elite and Priority landscape locations.

• Maximize aesthetic qualities and seasonal interest due to frequent and year-round visitation; maintaining a high quality image takes precedence over academic and research needs in these areas.

• Develop stylized landscapes that follow a theme where appropriate (e.g., building entrance gardens in the lab row collection of buildings).

• Diversify the plant collection with special and/or rare species that are supported by maintenance.

• Create a unique and memorable sensory and aesthetic experience through design, materials, and maintenance; utilize the highest degree of landscape architectural and horticultural design expertise to create a unique sense of place.

• Plan for seasonal displays as an integral design component. • Incorporate storm water management features as special design elements where

possible. • Balance woody plant replacements and/or restorations with respect to the original

design intent vs. current needs/conditions. • Provide APPA maintenance level 1 practices.

Gardens and Arboreta INTRODUCTION These areas are delineated and overseen by a curator or established administrative group. They are actively designed, planted, and managed; not naturalized. A primary goal for the use of these areas is education and research and intensive maintenance is required to sustain the integrity of the plantings and collections. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Incorporate a wide variety of plants to enhance educational and research value. Campus Master Plan – Update 2011

Page 27

• Actively utilize irrigation to maintain plant health and vigor. • Employ structural and non-structural BMP’s for storm water that are visually

sympathetic to the surrounding context. • Provide APPA maintenance level 1 practices.

Natural Areas INTRODUCTION The natural areas are designated by Board of Trustee action and are overseen by the Campus Natural Areas Committee. They are classified into three categories of protection and academic use is based on their overall quality and their potential for sustained use. They serve as protected examples of Michigan’s native landscape and wildlife. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Allow plant species to evolve naturally. • Limit trail construction and utilize natural materials where appropriate (e.g., mulch). • Maintain and respect the three different categories of preservation that ensure

maximum protection for high-quality natural areas, while other sites are available for experimentation and demonstration.

• Recognize value as a source of preservation and of genetic and biological diversity. Conservation and Demonstration INTRODUCTION Conservation and demonstration areas are built landscapes for the purpose of storm water management, education and research. They are actively designed, planted, and managed; requiring a moderate amount of maintenance to maintain the integrity of the plantings and operation of the storm water management features. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Actively monitor and manage areas. • Incorporate native plant populations to enhance educational and research value. • Label some plants to promote education and interpretation. • Employ structural and non-structure best management practices for storm water

management.

Campus Entrances INTRODUCTION Each and every entrance to the campus (vehicular and pedestrian) provides an important opportunity to strengthen the university’s image and reinforce its reputation for excellence. High quality landscape design and maintenance practices are a priority in these areas.


Consistent signage and a homogeneous landscape treatment is desirable for aiding visitor wayfinding and the efficient movement of goods and services. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Extensive academic utilization is not anticipated in these areas. • Strive for a consistent and high-quality landscape character (durable materials,

pleasant to the senses, well-constructed, etc.) while allowing unique and memorable variety; refinement will vary with campus locations and environmental conditions.

• Promote institutional reputation in a consistent and organized manner utilizing visual references identifiable from a distance (e.g., brick and limestone campus gateway signs).

• Preserve the scale and design intent of historic entrances through priority maintenance and delicate restoration.

• Utilize the entrance design and plants to slow vehicles down but not distract drivers. • Choose salt-tolerant plants and other hardy material that do not require (winter-long)

fencing once established. • Provide APPA maintenance level 2 practices.

Vehicular Entrances

• Design the landscape plantings with simple and bold patterns that are appropriate to a “35 mph landscape”; utilize large drifts of singular plant types.

• Establish a wooded grove or “gateway canopy” of shade trees and evergreens that will provide an interconnected canopy at maturity (example Beal Entrance).

• Use similar plants at each entrance, hardy to the specific location, and adjusted for context and scale. A homogeneous plant palette is desirable at each entrance within natural limits of environmental conditions. Plant variety should only be driven by unique conditions of a particular location (exposure, soil, irrigation, etc.).

• Utilize woody plants and possibly perennials that provide seasonal interest (leaf color, flower, branching habit, fall color, etc.) and minimize maintenance costs. Annuals and formal bulb displays are not appropriate at vehicular entrances.

• Coordinate the location and orientation of the brick and limestone campus gateway signs in the design.

• Maintain all appropriate clear vision zones for vehicular (motorized and non-motorized) and pedestrian safety.

Pedestrian Entrances

• Provide a pleasant transition into the campus with clear and open lines of sight for safety.

• Utilize understory trees and other woody plant material with seasonal interest to create a welcoming sense of scale and seasonal aesthetic variety. Annuals and formal bulb displays are not appropriate.

• Consider using black metal decorative fencing to reinforce a common design language and image especially along Michigan and Grand River avenues.


• Incorporate a visitor information kiosk at major pedestrian portals and at large concentrations of visitor parking.

Streetscapes INTRODUCTION The campus roadway system provides approximately 18 miles of opportunity to establish a quality image for the university. The streetscape, the landscape setting adjacent to the road, must address numerous design issues including safety, image, environmental sustainability, and wayfinding; all within what is often a very harsh growing condition. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Utilize canopy trees per MSU street tree list. • Utilize landscaping to support the overall wayfinding system (e.g., consistent

plantings at major signs to reinforce message). • Strive for a diverse collection of recommended urban-tolerant trees. • Incorporate plant species that can be used for study and research on extreme growing

conditions or pests; use the campus as a living/learning lab. • Establish plantings on both sides of walkways along major roadways to reinforce

pedestrian scale. • Maintain mature trees unless their condition poses a safety hazard. • Minimize visual obstructions at crosswalks; do not locate trees near intersections or

mid-block pedestrian crossings where they will obscure appropriate lines of sight. • Provide appropriate lighting and coordinate with tree plantings to provide adequate

light at maturity; provide appropriate “gap” at street lights. • Minimize use of trees with excessive litter, especially where adjacent to bus stops and

barrier-free path ramps. • Minimize single species avenues. • Minimize use of wildlife attractants. • Choose salt-tolerant plants minimizing need for protective fencing during the winter,

once plants are established. • Obtain review and approval of plant locations with the University Traffic Engineer

(DPPS). • Provide APPA maintenance level 3 or higher practices.

Regularly-Patterned Parkway This refers to the area of landscape between the road curb and the adjacent sidewalk where a regular cadence or pattern of canopy trees is appropriate.

• Blocks of single species, on both sides of the street is a desirable pattern, with patterns changing to promote diversity in any one corridor (intent is to avoid a mono-culture planting). This infers a more formal pattern adjacent to the road and allows a more informal pattern in the front-yard setback. (Often, straight lines are the norm due to space and underground utility constraints.)


• Maintain similarly sized and shaped mulch beds where appropriate. • Maintain minimum branching height of 8’ over walkways and roadways. • Landscape furnishings (other than bus shelters and bike racks) should not be located

between the road and sidewalk. Informal Parkway This refers to the area of landscape between the street curb and the adjacent sidewalk where an informal pattern of canopy trees is appropriate.

• Utilize tree species appropriate to the plant association existing in the area. • Do not utilize a regular geometry for tree spacing; embrace and reinforce the

informality of the context. Medians This refers to the area of landscape between opposing lanes of traffic.

• Utilize predominantly large canopy trees to provide visual safety for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Selectively use lower-branching or multi-stemmed material where appropriate and where not a visual safety concern.

• Species selection here can be more diverse than compared to the street trees allowing more informal and varied patterns.

• Slight earth mounding is desirable to promote drainage and salt shedding (except where bio-swales are appropriate).

• Choose salt-tolerant plants and other hardy material that do not require (winter-long) fencing once established.

• Perennials and or woody plant material (2’ or less in height) can be considered at mid-block crossings to accent these locations.

Front Yards This refers to the landscape area between the sidewalk and adjacent building, or if no building is present, the area immediately adjacent to the sidewalk.

• Maintain a predominance of canopy or large ornamental trees. Conifer trees can occur in areas where safety and/or lighting are not a concern and where visual screening is desirable.

• Provide an informal transition from the streetscape to the buildings; incorporate color and structural interest near building entrances.

• Strive for a consistent landscape treatment around all green-panel signs. Remove landscape treatment when the sign is removed. Consider mature plant size and growth habit so that plants do not obscure sign information.


Parking Areas INTRODUCTION Parking facilities are required to meet the institution’s teaching, research, and outreach mission. These facilities shall be properly landscaped to mitigate their size and presence within the overall campus park-like setting. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

• Meeting the functional requirements for parking takes precedence over academic and research needs in these areas.

• Screen cars from adjacent roadways or non-compatible land uses with landscaping. • Break up large expanses of parking into smaller zones. • Group trees where possible in larger landscape areas. • Preserve mature trees. • Properly design parking facilities within historic zones to minimize negative visual

impacts. • Restrict use of irrigation (only in locations adjacent to priority image areas or

signature landscapes. • Use drought-, heat-, and salt-tolerant plants. • Consider alternative pavement designs (e.g., permeable pavements or crushed glass

admixtures) • Install oil separators where rain water discharges into storm sewers and not into a bio-

filtration system. • Reduce heat gain through landscaping. • Coordinate landscape design with projected snow storage zones. • Provide APPA maintenance level 4 or higher practices

USE OF ANNUALS AND PERENNIALS The use of annuals should be restricted to elite campus locations, while perennials can be used in both elite and priority gardens and plazas per the Landscape Priorities Framework Plan. This will ensure a balance between their high aesthetic appeal and their inherent high maintenance requirements and costs.

• They should be considered an integral part of the design concept for the targeted area and applied in sufficient quantity as warranted by the scale of the space.

• Consider woody plants with showy flowers and/or other seasonal interests in lieu of more maintenance-intensive annuals/perennials. Incorporate in a meaningful way to achieve consistent goals (e.g., use of color at entrances to increase visibility and assist visitor wayfinding).

• Groundcovers, and annuals should not be used (or used in limited quantities) under mature trees due to negative impacts on the trees’ root system.

• Landscape Services may prepare designs, collaborating with EAS landscape architects prior to ordering plants. Three-year rotation designs are encouraged to provide variety where possible and to streamline the design and installation process.


• The use of large planters (planter selection in collaboration with EAS) in strategic locations (e.g., main building entrances, in lieu of bollards, etc.), managed by Landscape Services is acceptable (possible rental agreement). Their utilization is valid at residence hall entrances where a home-like feeling is desired especially for summer campus/events.

• Campus vehicular entrances should use drifts of woody plants that will provide three seasons of interest (e.g., roses) or at least a variety of seasonal interests. Utilize at an appropriate scale so as not to overpower the visual environment. Each entrance can have a unique palette due to conditions like sun, shade, soil, winter exposure, etc.

• Main building entrances can have a more complicated and maintenance intensive planting concept comprised of woody ornamentals.

• Design in accordance with existing irrigation systems; minimize the expansion of irrigated landscape to high priority image areas.

• Incorporate sustainability concepts in the design and use of annuals and perennials. Intensive maintenance requires more mechanical equipment that consumes fossil fuels and emits green-house gasses. Landscape priorities must also consider economic issues related to installation and maintenance.

SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

1. Protect natural systems. 2. Reduce pollution (chemical, erosion/sedimentation, water quality/temperature). 3. Restore/Improve ecological function (infiltration, degraded soils, habitat diversity). 4. Practice site appropriate plant selection – right plant right place –utilize material that

will thrive and perform to expectations without extensive maintenance unless warranted by academic/research mission.

5. Expand and promote the use of rain gardens on campus that utilize native/sustainable plant material, while enhancing the visual quality of a given area (i.e. Erickson Hall patio).

6. Eliminate species known to be invasive in mid-Michigan and do not incorporate invasive species in future planting designs (except where maintained and monitored under controlled conditions in limited numbers for teaching and research).

7. Minimize storm water conveyance in pipes by incorporating bio-swales, bio-retention areas, and rain gardens where aesthetically appropriate.

8. Introduce environmentally sustainable pavements into roadway, parking lot, and walkway designs (e.g., impervious, glass-add mixtures).

9. Introduce informative signage, where appropriate, to educate people regarding sustainable strategies.

10. Maintain proper salt spreading techniques on campus roads through proper calibration of salt spreading equipment, proper management of salt pile consumption, and identifying and managing areas of high salt sensitivity.

11. Incorporate storm water collection systems and grey-water systems into new architecture where appropriate.

12. Introduce linear sand filters along roadways and parking lots that empty into the river. 13. Utilize oil separators for parking lot storm water outfalls that discharge into the river. 14. Incorporate below-grade nutrient separating structures where less expensive surface

options are not feasible.


15. Provide a diverse matrix of plant material (taxonomy, structure, age) that minimizes large-scale impacts from disease and pest infestations.

16. Establish a delineated riparian buffer along the river. 17. Practice prudent use of irrigation (not NO irrigation). 18. Incorporate green roofs into the campus landscape and academic/research activity. 19. Provide a landscape that addresses the social aspects of sustainability (e.g., places for

a diverse range of people to interact). 20. Continue to expand the mature tree canopy for storm water management benefits. 21. Balance new development with open space and vegetation offsets. 22. Promote our investment in the campus landscape for positive public relations. 23. Establish wildlife habitats in appropriate areas; encourage wildlife where appropriate

(natural corridors/woodlots) and discourage wildlife where inappropriate (safety concerns).

24. Incorporate education and outreach components into the landscape (e.g., river access for classes, interpretive signs).

25. Make storm water management visible and an educational opportunity. 26. Consider lifecycle maintenance costs for structural best management practices (e.g.,

rain garden and infiltration basin maintenance). 27. Establish maintenance categories that are context appropriate. 28. Incorporate new construction standards for landscape implementation incorporating

aspects of LEED and the ASLA Sustainable Sites Initiative. 29. Balance use of wood mulch vs. groundcover plantings (cost, plant vigor, and

aesthetics).


Campus Master Plan – Update 2011

Page 36

MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED CIRCULATION NEAR-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS In the near-term (five-year planning horizon), the following projects are anticipated. Bogue Street Modifications

• Close roadway segment between Shaw Lane and Wilson Road in coordination with the FRIB project

• Reconstruct the Bogue Street and Shaw Lane traffic circle in response to ADA 2010 requirements; reconfigure into a more traditional signalized intersection with enhanced pedestrian safety

• Reconfigure the Wharton Center vehicular drop off; maintain accommodations for busses and barrier-free service

• Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle routes through the new open space to maintain this important north-south non-motorized corridor

• Closing this segment of Bogue Street will put pressure on the existing intersection of East Shaw Lane and Wilson Road; reconfigure and signalize as part of the Wilson Road extension recommendation

Wilson Road Extension

• Extend Wilson road to Hagadorn Road within 200-feet of the CN Railroad tracks and install a smart signal coordinated with the CN Railroad and Service Road signalized intersections

• Convert the north-south segment of Wilson Road between Shaw Lane and Conrad Hall into a two-lane roadway with signalized intersections as required

• Locate a majority of the reconstructed parking adjacent to Fee Hall, minimizing pedestrian/vehicular conflicts

• Reconfigure the vehicular drop off east of Hubbard Hall West Circle Drive

• Reconstruct West Circle Drive over a four-year time frame in coordination with a major steam utility upgrade project

• Maintain two vehicular traffic lanes and add a bike lane on the outer edge • Maintain a counter-clockwise traffic flow • Narrow the vehicular travel lanes to 10-feet wide; calming traffic and minimizing

impacts on the campus arboretum • Provide a new sidewalk between Linton Hall and Abbot Road to address pedestrian

and bicycle circulation needs

Chestnut Road Reconstruction • Reconstruct Chestnut Road from West Shaw Lane to Red Cedar Road in coordination

with a major utility enhancement project • Remove on-street parking and improve pedestrian safety at crosswalks • Add bicycle lanes


Farm Lane and Grand River Intersection • Re-engineer roadway geometry and pedestrian crosswalks to enhance safety • Signalize the East Circle Drive/Farm Lane intersection; synchronized with the Farm

Lane/Grand River intersection • Sever connection with Physics Road, eliminating a problematic turning movement • Reconfigure Mason Hall driveway • Eliminate access to Farm Lane from the parking lot north of the Psychology Building.

Provide access of Physics Road Parking Garage #2 (Auditorium Road)

• The existing parking ramp will require demolition in the near term due to age and escalating maintenance costs

• Replace parking consistent with the Campus Planning Principles calling for more perimeter supply

• Provide appropriate shuttle and bus service to meet user needs • Further incentivize utilization of commuter lot (parking lot #89) including appropriate

year-round bus service for faculty and staff needs

Multi-modal Transit Center • Develop a multi-modal transit center including a new train and bus station accessing

the CN Railroad and Amtrak Blue Water line • Demolish existing university buildings as required to accommodate facility

operations • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure including new sidewalks, bike storage,

and modern audible technology for pedestrian circulation at the Harrison Road intersection with Trowbridge and Service Roads

• Accommodate taxi, shuttle, car rental, and car share services • Provide adequate parking for patrons • Incorporate environmentally sustainable architectural and site development elements

including rain gardens, green roofs, and pervious pavement • Position new development to take advantage of future potential commuter rail along

the CSX Railroad

Red Cedar River Non-motorized Trail • Construct a new non-motorized route along the south side of the Red Cedar River

from the Kellogg Hotel and Conference Center to Hagadorn Road • Implement construction over a six-year phasing strategy • Provide dedicated and shared pathways, where appropriate, to enhance safety through

improved separation of bicycle and pedestrian circulation

Miscellaneous Non-motorized Enhancements • Continue to design all roadways as complete streets; update the university’s

construction guidelines and standards in accordance with State of Michigan Public Acts 134 and 135 of 2010 wherein all roadways are to be planned and designed to meet the needs of all legal users

• Continue to meet the needs of persons with disabilities and new ADA 2010 requirements


• Provide infrastructure to support a suite of transportation options that discourage single-occupancy vehicle trips to, from, and around campus (e.g., CATA Clean Commute and Zipcar car sharing programs)

• Reconstruct Farm Lane between Wilson Road and the Red Cedar River to accommodate bike lanes and sidewalk enhancements; creating a complete bicycle corridor from Grand River Avenue to Mount Hope Road

• Revise curb alignment at Abbott Road entrance and Grand River Avenue to control vehicular turning movements and improve bicycle safety

• Study and implement site improvements at the southwest corner of Chestnut and Shaw to curtail existing J-walking and to enhance pedestrian safety

• Add share the road pavement marking on Stadium Drive, Recycling Road, and Green Way

• Replace eroded footpath at the WWII memorial and Michigan Avenue with pavement and stairs

• Install new crosswalk on Red Cedar Road between Parking Ramp #5 and the Public Safety Building

• Provide new walkway at the West-Range Greenhouse’s parking lot to the Farm Lane and Wilson Road intersection

• Relocate crosswalk from Akers Hall loading dock area north to Shaw Lane • Construct an accessible route from Bessey Hall under the Farm Lane Bridge to

Auditorium Field LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are identified to guide physical development over the longer term. Beal Entrance

• Establish a two-way road from Michigan Avenue to The Spartan sculpture. • Coordinate with MDOT for intersection improvements at Beal Street and Michigan

Avenue; including a left-turn from west-bound Michigan and a traffic signal if warranted

• Provide a left-turn lane for access onto West Circle Drive Bouge Street within the South Academic District

• Loop Bogue Street through the South Academic District as a two-lane roadway, with center turn lanes as required

• Reengineer the existing Bogue Street and Service Drive intersection removing the awkward boulevard transitions and consider signalizing

• Provide roadway linkages to Mount Hope and Hagadorn Roads if warranted to meet future traffic volumes

Red Cedar Road at Spartan Stadium

• Reconfigure roadway alignment to increase separation of intersection with Kalamazoo Street

• Reconfigure parking lots to accommodate daily parking and events • Enhance stadium service access


Shaw Lane • Close segments of North Shaw Lane to private automobile traffic • Convert South Shaw Lane to two-way traffic between Red Cedar Road and Farm

Lane • Relocate all surface parking into a new parking garage at the southwest intersection

of Shaw Lane and Red Cedar Road • Reconfigure Shaw Lane east of Farm Lane to accommodate transition into the

existing one-way road system • Reconfigure Shaw Lane and Red Cedar Road Intersection • Establish limited access service road to Erickson Hall and the International Center for

service, emergency, barrier-free, and short-term parking Parking

• Relocate the approximately 1,100 surface parking spaces in the Central Academic District into a new parking garage at the intersection of Red Cedar Road and Shaw Lane

• Reserve the opportunity for a future parking garage or deck south of Spartan Stadium • Add peripheral parking at the State Police facility, adjacent to the existing commuter

parking lot (relocating the Agricultural Exposition facility), and potentially along Mount Hope Road

• Provide shuttle and/or additional bus service from perimeter parking to meet user needs

Bicycle Infrastructure

• Incorporate bicycle lanes into all roadways unless deemed inappropriate by the university traffic engineer

• Provide bicycle lockers at perimeter parking lots • Consider building sheltered and secured bicycle parking at major demand locations

(e.g., residential neighborhoods, parking garages, academic districts) • Create a dedicated bicycle and pedestrian path along the south side of the Red Cedar

River from Harrison to Hagadorn Roads • Install share the road pavement markings on Stadium Road, Green Way and

Recycling Road


MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ZONING ORDINANCE CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY that the following Act to Codify Regulations Affecting Campus Planning, Designating Land Area Uses, Establishing a Campus Master Plan, and Providing for the Administration Thereof, for the Benefit and Protection of the Property of the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University, was passed by the Board of Trustees at a meeting duly called and held at East Lansing, Michigan, on the ninth day of December, 2011, at which a quorum was present and voted. _______________________________ Bill Beekman, Secretary Dated: April 19, 1968 Revision Date: December 9, 2011


TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Statement of Purpose 48 Effectiveness of Ordinance 48 Authority of Board of Trustees 48 Definitions 48 General Regulations 49 District Regulations “AC” Academic District 50 “R” Residential District 51 “AR” Athletic and Recreation District 51 “SE” Service District 52 “N” Natural Area District 53 “AG” Agricultural District 53 “MU” Mixed Use District 54 Non-Conforming Uses and Buildings 55 Administration 55 Amendments 56 Zoning District Map 57 Protected Green Space 58


AN ACT TO CODIFY REGULATIONS AFFECTING CAMPUS PLANNING, DESIGNATING LAND AREA USES, ESTABLISHING A MASTER PLAN, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ADMINISTRATION THEREOF, FOR THE BENEFIT AND PROTECTION OF THE PROPERTY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY CONFERRED BY THE CONSTITUTION AND STATUTES OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN.

1.00 - STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 1.1 The Board of Trustees of Michigan State University believes that regulations are essential to preserve the

campus environment of spaciousness and landscape beauty, promote order and unity, and minimize congestion on the property governed by the Board, and to provide guidelines affecting the improvement thereof, the Board hereby adopts the following provisions:

2.00 - EFFECTIVENESS OF ORDINANCE 2.1 This ordinance became effective at 12:01 a.m. September 1, 1968. This Ordinance is coordinated with

and becomes an integral part of the Campus Master Plan and all updates. 3.00 – AUTHORITY OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES 3.1 This ordinance is enacted by the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University pursuant to and in

accordance with the authority and responsibility of said Board contained in the Constitution of the State of Michigan and the Public Acts relating thereto.

4.00 – DEFINITIONS 4.1 The term “institution” pertains specifically to Michigan State University at East Lansing, Michigan. 4.2 The term “academic use” encompasses any building or portion thereof that is used for the teaching of

classes, research facilities and administrative and operational facilities, or any similar function and use forthe educational and operational purposes of the institution.

4.3 The term “building” refers to principle-use and accessory structures, and all attached architectural

elements including stairs, areaways, ramps, and retaining walls that are integral to the design and function of the building.

4.4 The term “accessory building” includes a subordinate building or portion of a main building, located

within the same block or district, which is secondary in nature to the principal use. 4.5 The term “accessory use” refers to a use that is subordinate to the principal use within the same block or

district, comprising purposes secondary in nature to those of the principal use. 4.6 The term “ground area of a block” includes all land from the centerline of adjacent streets and roads or

abutting use area established by description on the Zoning District Map. Such lines may be established by curb lines, section lines, institution property lines, other property lines, or those lines as shown and described on the Zoning District Map which is a part of this ordinance.

4.7 The term “curb line” is defined by the back of curb on either side of a road that is used for the general

movement of motor vehicles, and encompasses those existing or extended, but does not include the curb line of parking bays, bus turnouts or similar variations. If no curb exists, the location of a proposed curb will be considered as the curb line. All setbacks are measured from the back of curb.

4.8 The term “nearest roadway” means that road which lies nearest any side of a building that is used for the

general movement of motor vehicles, and does not include service drives or related variations thereof.


4.9 The term “non-conforming use” includes any building or land occupied and used at the time of the adoption of this Zoning Ordinance which use does not conform with the use regulations established therefore.

4.10 The term “Coverage” refers to the amount of ground area covered by buildings within a specified block of

land defined by the adjacent roadway centerlines. 4.11 The term “protected landscape area” includes any land area essentially kept in an open lawn, wooded or

landscaped condition, that is free of parking and buildings, and reserved for general use and enjoyment by the public and residents of the campus. Protected landscape areas may include recreation fields, walkways, bicycle paths, bicycle parking, bridges, sculpture pavilions, amphitheaters and other related structures that are compatible with the purpose of these areas.

4.12 The term “service use” refers to any building or land that is primarily involved with utility services and

functions, and such accessory uses essential to the operation of the institution. 4.13 The terms “story” and “story height” refer to that portion of a building that is included between the surface

of any floor and the surface of the next floor above it. 4.14 The term “setback” refers to the dimension between a building and adjacent roadway’s curb line. 4.15 The terms “footprint” and “footprint change” refers to the existing layout or modification of the existing

layout regarding buildings, roads, parking, sidewalks, plazas, and other major constructed site features. 5.00 - GENERAL REGULATIONS 5.1 Districts Established: In order to regulate and restrict the location of buildings and other structures erected

or altered for specified uses, the campus is hereby divided into the following “Zoning Districts”:

AC-N North Academic District AC-C Central Academic District AC-S South Academic District R Residential District AR Athletic and Recreation District SE Service District N Natural Areas District AG Agricultural and Natural Resources District MU-N North Mixed Use District MU-S South Mixed Use District

5.2 Area Boundaries: The boundaries of Zoning Districts are established on the Zoning District Map attached

hereunto and made a part hereof, and all notations, references, and other descriptions contained thereon are made a part of this ordinance.

5.3 Compliance: Except as herein provided no land shall be used and no building shall be erected, converted,

enlarged, reconstructed or substantially altered which does not comply with the district regulations established by this ordinance for the district in which the building or land is located.

5.4 Essential Utility Services: Structures required in conjunction with the distribution and maintenance of

essential utility services may be permitted in any location when approved by the Director of Campus Planning and Administration who shall submit a determination of necessity therefore. The Director may, if he deems it necessary, refer any specific request for an essential utility service structure through appropriate channels to the President and the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University for their consideration and determination.

All public utilities included in the essential utilities services shall be subject to the same provisions

outlined in the preceding paragraph.


5.5 Except as provided herein, no buildings, roads or parking shall be located in the Protected Landscape Areas designated within the Zoning Districts as shown on the Protected Landscape Areas Map. The design of all elements in the protected landscape areas shall be approved by the Director of Campus Planning and Administration. Such elements include walkways, bridges, sculpture, pavilions, amphitheaters, plantings, bicycle storage, essential utility services, storm water management features, and modification to pre-existing disallowed elements such as parking lots, roads and service drives. Expansion of existing buildings that abut Protected Landscape Areas requires approval from the Director of Campus Planning and Administration and shall be allowed only when other alternatives are proven to be unreasonable and when the expansion will only cause a minor change in the character of the Protected Landscape Area.

6.00 - DISTRICT REGULATIONS 6.1 “AC” Academic Districts: The following provisions shall apply to the Academic Districts AC-N, AC-

C, and AC-S:

6.1.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted Uses for the AC Districts shall include the following Principal and Accessory Uses. All uses not listed are not permitted in the AC Districts unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance:

6.1.1.1 Principal Uses and Buildings:

• Teaching facilities, including classrooms, lecture halls, instructional laboratories and

similar facilities used for general educational purposes.

• Other facilities, including research laboratories, general student facilities other than student housing, faculty offices and all administrative and operational functions.

6.1.1.2 Accessory Uses and Buildings:

• Surface parking and parking structures.

• Uses and structures necessary to the maintenance, operation and function of the principal uses and buildings.

• Recreation fields and buildings.

6.1.2 Building Height Requirements:

6.1.2.1 All buildings shall be limited to six stories of occupied space plus required rooftop

equipment in Districts AC-C and AC-S, and to four stories of occupied space plus required rooftop equipment in AC-N.

6.1.2.2 Teaching facilities shall be located in the lowest floors possible, and not above the

fourth floor of any building. 6.1.2.3 Parking garages shall be limited to six parking levels above and including ground

level. 6.1.2.4 Accessory buildings shall be no higher than necessary to accommodate the proposed

use and under no circumstances shall exceed the height of principal uses in the district.

6.1.3 Set Back Requirements: All buildings shall be set back a minimum of 40 feet from the nearest

curb line of the nearest roadway.


6.1.4 Building Coverage:

6.1.4.1 Buildings shall not cover more than 30% of the ground area of any given block within the AC District unless otherwise specified herein.

6.1.4.2 Buildings shall not cover more than 35% of the ground area of any given block

within the specific area defined by Red Cedar Road to the west, the CN Railroad to the south, the Residential District to the east, and South Shaw Lane to the north.

6.1.4.3 The block of land defined by South Shaw Lane to the north, Farm Lane to the west,

Wilson Road to the south, and the Residential District to the east has been granted a 42% coverage limitation by Board of Trustees action on April 9, 2008.

6.2 “R” Residential District: The following provisions shall apply to the Residential District:

6.2.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted Uses for the “R” District shall include the following Principal and Accessory Uses. All uses not listed are not permitted in the R District unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance:


• Residence halls and their associated living services, such as food services and health

and wellness facilities.

• Multiple unit dwellings.

• Primary schools, daycare centers, playgrounds and other outdoor recreation facilities.

6.2.1.2 Accessory Uses:

• Limited academic uses.

• Limited retail, recreation and commercial uses to serve residents.

• Other uses within the building necessary to the maintenance, operation and function of the principal uses and buildings.

• Surface parking.


6.2.2.1 Residence Halls: Height shall be limited to six stories plus required rooftop

equipment.

6.2.2.2 Accessory Uses and Buildings: Height shall be limited to three stories.

6.2.3 Set Back Requirements: All buildings shall have a set back of a minimum distance of 50 feet from the nearest curb line of the nearest roadway.

6.2.4 Building Coverage: Buildings shall not cover more than 20% of the ground area within any

given block in the “R” Districts. 6.3 “AR” Athletic and Recreation District: The following provision shall apply to the Athletic and

Recreation District:

6.3.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted Uses for the “AR” District shall include the following Principal and Accessory Uses. All uses not listed are not permitted in the AR District unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance:



• Facilities related to recreational, intramural and sport event type of uses.


• Other uses and buildings necessary to the maintenance, operation and function of the

principal uses and buildings.

• Surface parking and parking garages.


6.3.2.1 All buildings shall be limited to four stories in height or to the height necessary to accommodate the particular sport function and design.

6.3.2.2 Parking garages shall be limited to six levels above and including ground level.

6.3.3 Set Back Requirements:

6.3.3.1 All organized recreational, intramural or sport fields and courts shall have a set back

of a minimum distance of 50 feet from nearest curb line of the nearest roadway

6.3.3.2 All buildings shall have a set back of a minimum distance of 65 feet from the nearest curb line of the nearest roadway.


given block in the “AR” District. 6.4 “SE” Service District: The following provisions shall apply to the Service District:

6.4.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted Uses for the “SE” District shall include the following Principal and Accessory Uses. All uses not listed are not permitted in the SE District unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance:


• Power plants including solar or wind energy generation and storage

• Maintenance centers.

• Institutional stores.

• Storage facilities.

• Office buildings.


• Other uses and buildings necessary or similar to the principal uses and buildings

pertinent to the maintenance and operation of the institution.


6.4.2 Building Height Requirements: All buildings shall be limited to six stories in height. The only

exceptions allowed will be power plant chimneys and similar accessory uses.


6.4.3 Set Back Requirements: All buildings shall have a set back of a minimum distance of 50 feet

from the nearest curb line of the nearest roadway or edge of pavement where curbs do not exist.


given block of the “SE” District. 6.5 “N” Natural Areas District: The following provisions shall apply to the Natural Areas District:

6.5.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted Uses for the “N” District shall include the following Principal and Accessory Uses. All uses not listed are not permitted in the N District unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance:

6.5.1.1 Principal Uses:

• Permitted uses include observation, nature study, teaching, research and

demonstration in Category I, II and III Natural Areas as defined by the Campus Natural Areas Committee and shown on the most recent version of the MSU Campus Natural Areas Map and Zoning District Map.

6.5.2 Special Provisions: The Natural Areas District shall remain undeveloped. No buildings,

roads, improved walks, utilities or other structures and alterations are permitted in the Natural Areas District.

6.6 “AG” Agricultural and Natural Resources District: The following provisions shall apply to the

Agriculture and Natural Resources District:

6.6.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted Uses for the “AG” District shall include the following Principal and Accessory Uses. All uses not listed are not permitted in the AG District unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance:


• Program related single-family dwellings.

• Agricultural and natural resources research, teaching and outreach facilities for plants and animals.

• Farm areas for experimentation, teaching, outreach, and cultivation or production of plants and animals for institutional use.

• Associated agricultural facilities not operated by the Institution.


• Other uses and buildings that are necessary to the operation and maintenance of the

principal uses and buildings such as silos, wells and pumping stations for the entire institution, maintenance centers, etc. shall be allowed.


• Solar or wind energy generation and storage.

6.6.2 Building Height Requirements: All buildings shall be limited to a height of two stories, with

the exception of silos and similar structures that are necessarily of greater height.


6.6.3 Set Back Requirements: All buildings shall be set back a minimum distance of 100 feet from centerline of nearest public roadway.

6.7 “MU” Mixed Use Districts: The following provisions shall apply to the two independent mixed-use

districts MU-N and MU-S:

6.7.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted uses for the MU Districts shall include the following Principal and Accessory Uses. All uses not listed are not permitted in the MU Districts unless otherwise provided for in this ordinance:

6.7.1.1 Principal Uses and Buildings MU-N:

• Teaching facilities, including classrooms, lecture halls, instructional laboratories,

general student facilities, and similar facilities used for general educational purposes.

• Research laboratories.

• Public/private business incubators.

• Student and faculty housing.

• Faculty and administrative office.

• Health and wellness facilities.

• Academic support.

• Auxiliary retail services.

6.7.1.2 Principal Uses and Buildings MU-S

• Research laboratories.

• Public/private business incubators.

• Student, faculty, and alumni retirement housing.

• Administrative offices.

• Health and wellness facilities.

• Auxiliary retail services.


• Surface parking and parking structures.

• Uses and structures that are necessary to the maintenance, operation and function of the principal uses and buildings.

• Athletic/recreation fields and buildings.


6.7.2.1 All buildings in the MU-N District shall be limited to six stories of occupied space

plus required rooftop equipment. Buildings within the MU-S District that


incorporate parking, office space, and housing space should be limited to eight stories of occupied space plus required rooftop equipment.

6.7.2.2 Teaching facilities shall be located in the lowest floors possible, and not above the

fourth floor of any building.

6.7.2.3 Parking garages shall be limited to six parking levels above and including ground level.

6.7.2.4 Accessory buildings shall be no higher than necessary to accommodate the proposed

use and under no circumstances shall exceed the height of principal uses in the district.

6.7.3 Set Back Requirements: All buildings shall be set back a minimum of 40 feet from the nearest

curb line of the nearest roadway.

6.7.4 Building Coverage: Buildings shall not cover more than 30% of the ground area of any givenblock within the MU-N District and 35% of the ground area of any given block within the MU-S District.

6.7 Non-Conforming Uses and Buildings:

6.7.1 Non-conforming uses: The use of any land area existing at the time of the adoption of this ordinance may be continued although such use does not conform to the provisions hereof.

6.7.2 Non-conforming buildings: The use of any building existing at the time of the adoption of this

ordinance may be continued although such use does not conform to the provisions hereof. Such non-conforming use may be extended throughout a building.

7.00 - ADMINISTRATION 7.1 The Director of Campus Planning and Administration shall be responsible for the administration of this

ordinance, the District Map, the Protected Landscape Areas Map, and the Campus Master Plan, all as hereafter amended and modified.

7.1.1 The Director is specifically granted authority to:

7.1.1.1 Assure that university projects are in compliance with the University Zoning

Ordinance and Campus Master Plan, including Campus Planning Principles.

7.1.1.2 Approve the extension, reduction, revision or interpretation of a district or block boundary.

7.1.1.3 Approve the reconstruction of a non-conforming building that has been destroyed or

partially destroyed.

7.1.1.4 Approve the erection and use of a building or the use of land in any location for an essential utility service, or allow for the enlargement, extension or relocation of these existing uses. All public utilities are excluded from this exception.

7.1.1.5 Interpret the provisions of this ordinance where the street layout actually on the

ground varies from the street layout as shown on the Zoning District Map fixing the several areas.

7.1.1.6 Interpret the use of a planned building as to whether it is a building use that is

permitted in the district for which it is desired to be erected, and to interpret as to whether the planned building will increase the ground area covered by buildings over


the maximum percentage allowed within the block in which it is planned to be erected.

7.1.1.7 Approve the design of all modifications and improvements to Protected Landscape

Areas.

7.1.1.8 Refer any specific request for a variance, amendment, interpretation, or other similar action as stated in the preceding paragraphs to the President and the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University for their decision and disposition.

8.00 - AMENDMENTS 8.1 This ordinance may be amended from time to time, either upon the recommendation of the Director of

Campus Planning and Administration and with the approval of the President and the Board of Trustees, or by the Board of Trustees upon their own motion, and such amendments shall be equally effective as though incorporated in the Zoning District Map.



Page 57


Page 58

Appendix C: Buildings by Age

Fall 2011

Submitted by:

Age of Buildings0 – 10 Years11 – 30 Years31 – 50 Years51+ Years

Appendix D: Student EnrollmentsFall Semester 2015

Fall 2011

Submitted by:

Michigan State UniversityOffice of the Registrar

Comparison of Student EnrollmentsFALL 2015

COLLEGE/UNITStudentsEnrolled

Full TimeStudents

Fiscal YearEquated

Teaching College Course

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Agriculture and Natural Resources 4,683 9.3% 4,092 9.3% 2,991 7.0% 15,404 7.4%Arts and Letters 1,888 3.7% 1,672 3.8% 5,412 12.7% 22,335 10.7%Resdntl Coll Arts and Humanities 307 0.6% 287 0.7% 120 0.3% 555 0.3%Business 7,830 15.5% 6,940 15.8% 4,174 9.8% 23,372 11.2%Communication Arts and Sciences 3,652 7.2% 3,256 7.4% 2,276 5.4% 11,788 5.6%Education 3,726 7.4% 2,874 6.5% 2,552 6.0% 12,752 6.1%Engineering 5,772 11.4% 5,357 12.2% 2,714 6.4% 13,439 6.4%Human Medicine 1,098 2.2% 913 2.1% 1,150 2.7% 5,709 2.7%James Madison College 1,165 2.3% 1,063 2.4% 504 1.2% 1,874 0.9%Lyman Briggs College 1,995 3.9% 1,850 4.2% 607 1.4% 2,698 1.3%Music 546 1.1% 483 1.1% 450 1.1% 3,176 1.5%Natural Science 5,976 11.8% 5,334 12.1% 9,188 21.6% 47,067 22.5%Nursing 1,149 2.3% 928 2.1% 389 0.9% 1,313 0.6%Osteopathic Medicine 1,403 2.8% 1,239 2.8% 1,266 3.0% 6,643 3.2%Social Science 6,764 13.4% 5,812 13.2% 7,829 18.4% 34,364 16.4%Assoc Prov Undergraduate Education 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 136 0.3% 1,080 0.5%Veterinary Medicine 936 1.9% 745 1.7% 714 1.7% 5,355 2.6%Assoc Provost Academic Services 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 78 0.2% 203 0.1%Assoc Provost Lifelong Education 728 1.4% 282 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%Assoc Prov Acad Stdnt Svc & Multicu 925 1.8% 899 2.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%Total University 50,543 44,026 42,549 209,127

CLASS/LEVELDoctoral 3,304 6.5% 3,155 7.2% 2,318 5.4% 6,298 3.0%Masters 4,513 8.9% 2,208 5.0% 2,770 6.5% 13,555 6.5%Total Graduate 7,817 5,363 5,089 19,853Freshman 9,421 18.6% 9,199 20.9% 8,554 20.1% 41,933 20.1%Junior 9,623 19.0% 9,015 20.5% 8,641 20.3% 42,953 20.5%Senior 10,727 21.2% 8,653 19.7% 8,793 20.7% 44,362 21.2%Sophomore 8,714 17.2% 8,320 18.9% 7,909 18.6% 38,761 18.5%Total Undergraduate 38,485 35,187 33,897 168,009Graduate Professional 2,532 5.0% 2,460 5.6% 2,532 6.0% 16,895 8.1%Total Graduate Professional 2,532 2,460 2,532 16,895Non-Degree 1,709 3.4% 1,016 2.3% 1,031 2.4% 4,370 2.1%Total Non-Degree 1,709 1,016 1,031 4,370Grand Total 50,543 44,026 42,549 209,127 Percent of Total Students 100.0% 87.1% 84.2%

Average Student Course: 4.1 Course EnrollmentsFull-Time Students column: A head count of students who are carrying minimum credits for full-time status: Undergraduate-12; Masters-9; Doctoral-6; and Graduate Professional-12.

Fiscal Year Equated students column: Calculated by dividing the total number of credit hours by the number of credits carried by a full-time student (full-time status: Undergraduate-15 (prior to FS99, 15 1/2 credits); Masters-12 credits; Doctoral-8 credits; and Graduate Professional-head count).

Appendix E: Building Condition Assessment

Thu Jul 02 07:37:12 EDT 2015 Page 1 of 85 9af375e3-4946-4fbf-a620-269fc366113a

JIT NEEDS FOR CAMPUS FACILITIES - FISCAL YEARS 2015/16 to 2020/21


About This Report The dollar values displayed in this report are in inflated building cost index format. This means that the project estimates are inflated

using Engineering News Records's Building Cost Index (annual averages) to what they are projected to be at the current time. Because the index is not available until January of the following year, the current year value of the index is determined from a linear regression of the last ten years of the index.

The following criteria were used in selecting data for this report: Only records with a scheduled year that is greater than or equal to 2016 and less than or equal to 2021 are included. Un-funded items for fiscal years prior to 2016 will be rolled up into the entries for fiscal year 2016. Only records with a funding responsibility identified in the following list will be included:

General Fund Maintenance & Repair

Only records that have a dollar amount that is greater than or equal to $20,000 are included. Only non-transitional infrastructure is included. Only unfunded projects are included. Only the following infrastructure project types are included:

BUILDING ENVELOPE, BUILDING INTERIOR, BUILDING SYSTEMS All infrastructure objects types are included. All object classes are included.


Building Envelope2016

0031 - AUDITORIUM

367 - DOORS - EXTERIOR (#DEF006895) REPLACE EXTERIOR WOOD DOOR HARDWARE AND REFINISH DOORS $111,650

365 - ROOFING

(#DEF011561) REPLACE EDPM ROOFS $66,000

Subtotal: $177,650

0182 - B AKER HALL

364 - MASONRY WALLS - EXTERIOR (#DEF009155) EXTERIOR MASONRY REPAIRS AND CAULKING $50,000

Subtotal: $50,000

0471A - BEEF CATTLE RESEARCH-MAIN

361 - PAINTING - EXTERIOR (#DEF003289) EXTERIOR PAINTING - DOOR TRIM & FROM OF OFFICE BUILDING $41,413

Subtotal: $41,413

0002 - BERKEY HALL

367 - DOORS - EXTERIOR (#DEF000062) REPLACE EXTERIOR WOOD DOORS $126,541

364 - MASONRY WALLS - EXTERIOR (#DEF009158) EXTERIOR MASONRY AND CAULKIING $80,000

Subtotal: $206,541

0079 - BESSEY HALL

364 - MASONRY WALLS - EXTERIOR (#DEF009161) EXTERIOR MASONRY AND CAULKING REPAIRS $75,000

380 - WINDOWS (#DEF003522) REPLACE WINDOWS AND EXTERIOR DOORS $1,996,454

Subtotal: $2,071,454


0168 - BIOCHEMISTRY

(#DEF003828) REPLACE EXTEROR ALUMINUM DOORS AND HARDWARE $35,497

(#DEF003438) REPLACE NORTH AND SOUTH WINDOW FACADES, INCLUDING EAST AND WEST STAIR TOWERS $650,778

$686,274

0069 - BRESLIN

(#DEF009156) EXTERIOR MASONRY REPAIRS AND CAULKING $150,000

$150,000

0204 - CENTRAL SCHOOL

(#DEF009162) EXTERIOR MASONRY AND CAULKING REPAIRS $40,000

$40,000

0060 - CENTRAL SERVICES

(#DEF003654) REPLACE OLD WINDOWS WITH ALUMINUM FRAMED, INSULATED GLASS. $236,646

$236,646

0200 - CLINICAL CENTER-CLINIC

360 - GLASS REPLACEMENT & GLAZING (#DEF005071) REPLACE EXISTING METAL SIDING ON ENTIRE COMPLEX $4,197,076

$4,197,076

0084 - COMMUNICATION ARTS

(#DEF011563) REPALCE AND REPAIR DETERIORATING AREAS OF ROOF $1,400,000

$1,400,000

0035 - COMPUTER CENTER

(#DEF000175) WINDOWS - REPLACE BUILDING WINDOWS AND GLASS BLOCK. $666,006


$666,006

0009 - COWLES HOUSE

0081 - ENGINEERING

(#DEF002390) REPLACE WINDOWS WITH NEW THERMALPANE INSULATED GLASS WINDOWS $113,631

$113,631

0057 - DEMONSTRATION HALL

(#DEF000231) WINDOWS - REPLACE ALL OLD BUILDING WINDOWS (-197) $1,024,846

$1,024,846

0206 - ENG RESEARCH-JOLLY RD

(#DEF002143) ROOFS #1 AND 2 $136,258

$136,258

(#DEF000243) EXTERIOR DOORS - REPLACE ALL EXTERIOR DOORS, HARDWARE AND FRAMES - $199,802

360 - GLASS REPLACEMENT & GLAZING (#DEF003964) REPLACE FAILED GLASS UNITS $111,801

$311,603

0474 - ENTOMOLOGY FIELD RESEARCH-MAIN

(#DEF003997) REPLACE EXTERIOR DOORS (2) OHD`S AND (3) HM DOORS $23,292

$23,292


0091 - FARRALL HALL

(#DEF003576) REPLACE ROOFING #3, 4 $776,000

(#DEF003907) REPLACE STEEL WINDOWS WITH NEW INSULATED WINDOWS $582,299

$1,358,299

0179 - FOOD SCIENCE

(#DEF000317) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT ROOF #3, 7 $40,877

$40,877

0067 - HANNAH ADMINISTRATION

(#DEF000360) ROOF REPLACEMENT/RESTORATION, ROOFS 2,3,4,5,6,AND 8 $582,299

(#DEF001443) REPLACE WINDOWS WITH A CURTAINWALL AND WINDOW RETROFIT. DOORS. $2,390,128

$2,972,428

0456M - HORSE RESEARCH-STRG/EXERCISE

(#DEF003616) ROOFS #1 $38,279

$38,279

0456B - HORSE RESEARCH-WEST HORSE BARN

(#DEF002131) ROOFS #2 AND 3 $52,407

$52,407

0407F - HORTICULTURE RES - WINERY

(#DEF002139) ROOFS #1 AND 2 $45,419

$45,419

0005 - HUMAN ECOLOGY



(#DEF000378) ROOF REPLACEMENT - ASBESTOS SHINGLES, BUILT UP, COPPER $718,667

$898,667

0051 - IM SPORTS-CIRCLE

(#DEF004657) UPGRADES TO INDOOR POOL INCLUDING PIPING, LIGHTS, TILE, POOL EQUIPMENT,... $4,436,565

$4,436,565

0175 - IM SPORTS-EAST

(#DEF000411) ROOF REPLACEMENT / RESTORATION $956,519

$956,519

0151 - IM SPORTS-WEST

(#DEF006638) REPLACE ROOF #13 $54,925

$54,925

0167 - INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING FACILITIES

(#DEF004188) REPLACE EXTERIOR ENTRANCE DOORS, FRAMES AND HARDWARE $81,522

$81,522

0056 - JENISON FIELDHOUSE

(#DEF004879) REPAIR MASONRY AT ENTRANCES $116,460

(#DEF004020) REPLACE BALANCE OF STEEL FRAMED SINGLE GLAZED WINDOWS $215,451

$331,911


0150 - KRESGE ART

(#DEF004563) REPLACE BALCONY DOORS AND HARDWARE ON SOUTH SIDE OF BLDG $114,131

(#DEF006668) REPLACE CURTAIN WALL/WINDOWS $5,181,575

$5,295,706

0150A - KRESGE ART-SCULPTURE STUDIO

(#DEF004564) REPLACE EXTERIOR ALUMINUM DOORS AND HARDWARE IN (2) LOCATIONS $23,292

$23,292

0406A - LANDSCAPE SRVCS NURSERY-HEADHOUSE

(#DEF006639) REPLACE ROOF #1, 2, AND 3 $31,089

$31,089

0049 - LIBRARY

(#DEF004017) REPLACE EXTERIOR ALUMINUM ENTRANCE DOORS AND HARDWARE $128,106

$128,106

0183 - LIFE SCIENCE

(#DEF000495) GENERAL MASONRY & CAULKING REPAIRS $354,970

$354,970

0014 - LINTON HALL

(#DEF004038) REPLACE WINDOWS IN ORIGINAL BUILDING TO MATCH 1996 ADDITION. $931,679

$931,679


0154 - MANLY MILES

(#DEF006751) REPLACE ALL WINDOWS $1,295,394

$1,295,394

0022 - MORRILL HALL OF AGRICULTURE

(#DEF006641) REPLACE ROOFS #4 AND 5 $310,895

$310,895

0013 - MUSEUM

(#DEF003499) REPLACE ELECTRO-MECHANICAL DOOR ACTUATORS (HANDICAP ENTRANCE) $35,497

(#DEF000560) WINDOWS - REPLACE ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS, OLD STEEL (341) $828,262

$863,759

0011 - MUSIC

(#DEF000586) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT ROOF #4, 5, 7, 8 AND 9 $191,988

(#DEF003959) WHOLE BUILDING WINDOW REPLACEMENT $1,164,598

$1,356,586

0021 - MUSIC PRACTICE

(#DEF004485) REPLACE ROOFS 2, 7 AND 8, $29,614

$29,614

0128 - NISBET


$90,000

0017 - OLD BOTANY


(#DEF000647) REPLACE OLD WOOD WINDOWS (129) $276,456 $276,456

0047 - OLDS HALL

(#DEF004012) REPLACE FIRE ESCAPE EXTERIOR DOORS, FRAMES AND HARDWARE (9) $57,648

$57,648

0003 - OLIN HEALTH CENTER

(#DEF002353) REPLACE 7 EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND HARDWARE $45,419

(#DEF009160) EXTERIOR MASONRY AND CAULKING REPAIRS

(#DEF002357) REPLACE ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS $873,449

$993,868

0212 - PAVILION AG LIVESTOCK

(#DEF002344) REPLACE VARIOUS HOLLOW METAL AND OVERHEAD DOORS WHERE DAMAGED $26,640

(#DEF009166) EXTERIOR MASONRY REPAIRS AND CAULKING

$76,640

0086 - PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCE

360 - GLASS REPLACEMENT & GLAZING(#DEF005082) REMOVE DOUBLE STRENGHT GLASS IN ROOF AND REPLACE WITH POLYCARBONATE. $85,148

(#DEF000719) EXTERIOR MASONRY RESTORATION AND EXTERIOR WATERPROOFING $277,285

262 - PUMPS(#DEF009053) REPLACE FIRE PUMP AND CONTROLLER $45,000

$407,434

0178 - PLANT BIOLOGY


(#DEF000728) EXTERIOR DOORS - REPLACE ALL MAIN ENTRANCES. $70,994 $70,994

0027 - PSYCHOLOGY

(#DEF000706) GENERAL MASONRY AND CAULKING RESTORATION $150,000

$150,000

0087 - PUBLIC SAFETY

(#DEF004573) EXTERIOR ENTRANCE DOORS/ FRAMES/ HARDWARE $79,193

(#DEF000790) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT ROOF #1,2,3,5 $560,959

$640,152

0450E - PUREBRED BEEF - HAY SHED

(#DEF003260) PAINT ROOF $42,596

$42,596

0450A - PUREBRED BEEF - MAIN

(#DEF000795) REPAIR CRACKED BLOCK WALLS $47,952

(#DEF004569) REPLACE EXISTING VINYL SIDING WITH NEW STEEL VERTICAL BARN SIDING AND TRIM $93,168

$141,120

0450B - PUREBRED BEEF - SHEEP BARN

(#DEF002188) DOORS - EXTERIOR $25,593

$25,593


0450C - PUREBRED BEEF-LOOSE HOUSING

(#DEF003242) RE-COAT NE ROOF $20,707 $20,707

0189 - REGIONAL CHILLED WATER PLANT

(#DEF004562) EXTERIOR DOOR REPLACEMENT (2) ENTRY DOORS & (2) OVERHEAD DOORS $23,292

(#DEF000801) GENERAL MASONRY & CAULKING RESTORATION OF ENTIRE BUILDING $150,000

(#DEF000813) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT ROOF #2 $93,241

$266,533

0052A - RIVER WATER RESEARCH - LAB

(#DEF004665) REMOVE AND REPLACE ROOFS 1 AND 2 $64,330

$64,330

0430A - SOIL SCIENCE - LAB

(#DEF000874) EXTERIOR DOORS - REPAIR AND PAINT $46,077

$46,077

0142 - STUDENT SERVICES


(#DEF001368) REPLACE WINDOW WALL SYSTEM $3,316,208

$3,691,293

0440A - SWINE RESEARCH - BARN/ELEVATOR STGE

(#DEF003156) REMOVE OLD ROOF SHINGLES AND REPLACE (AREAS 1,4,5) REPLACE AREA 3 WITH NEW COATING SYSTEM $93,168

$93,168


0440B - SWINE RESEARCH - GARAGE

(#DEF003605) DOORS - EXTERIOR $35,998 $35,998

0065 - TB SIMON POWER PLANT

(#DEF004526) REPLACE ORIGINAL OVERHEAD DOORS ON BLDG EXTERIOR $116,460

(#DEF004528) REPLACE MAIN ENTRANCE EXTERIOR DOOR AND VESTIBULE DOOR AND HARDWARE $23,292

(#DEF004527) REPLACE ORIGINAL HOLLOW METAL EXTERIOR DOORS AND HARDWARE $52,407

$192,159

0472D - TREE RESEARCH-HEADHOUSE

(#DEF000913) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT - GREENHOUSE (NORTH) ROOF #1, GREENHOUSE (SOUTH) $181,663

$181,663

0453D - UFSC - COMMUNITY STORAGE

(#DEF003613) ROOF #1 $95,697

$95,697

0453J - UFSC - MATERIALS & PESITCIDE STRG

(#DEF003615) ROOF #1 $57,418

$57,418

0453I - UFSC - NORTH MORTON

(#DEF003614) ROOF #1 $76,557

$76,557

0453G - UFSC-4-H


(#DEF000924) ROOF #1 $139,740 $139,740

0453H - UFSC-MAINTENANCE

(#DEF002140) ROOF #1 $75,699

$75,699

0446F - VET RESEARCH - GERM FREE BARN

(#DEF000961) REPLACE ROOF #1 $124,146

$124,146

0446C - VET RESEARCH - MANAGER'S HOUSE

(#DEF005187) COMPLETE EXTERIOR RENOVATION INCLUDING WINDOWS, DOORS, SIDING, AND ROOFING. $38,704

(#DEF006884) REPLACE ALL WINDOWS AND MAIN ENTRY DOORS $20,300

$59,004

0170 - VETERINARY MEDICAL CENTER


$387,038

CX0446 - VETERINARY RESEARCH CENTER COMPLEX


$150,000


0078 - WELLS HALL

(#DEF004483) REPLACE 6 EXTERIOR DOORS AND HARDWARE AT A & D WINGS $34,938 $34,938

0085 - WHARTON

(#DEF011562) REMOVE AND REPLACE WET AREAS OF ROOF $160,000

$160,000

0008 - WILLS HOUSE

(#DEF004554) REPLACE (3) ENTRANCES, DOORS, FRAMES, AND HARDWARE $23,292

(#DEF009167) EXTERIOR MASONRY AND CAULKING RESTORATION $25,000

(#DEF004625) REPLACE ALL WINDOWS AND EXTERIOR DOORS $362,710

$411,002

Subtotal for FY 2016: $42,757,266

2017

(#DEF006643) REPLACE ROOF #2 $76,687

$76,687

0163 - CHEMISTRY

(#DEF010780) MASONRY AND CAULKING RESTORATION IN CHEM HALL $500,000

$500,000



(#DEF009168) EXTERIOR MASONRY AND CAULKING RESTORATION $80,000

0009 - COWLES HOUSE

(#DEF007130) CONCRETE & MASONRY REPAIRS AT BUILDING ENTRANCES $20,300

$20,300

0442E - CROP SCIENCE - STRG 1

(#DEF006644) REPLACE ROOF #1 $106,000

$106,000

0144 - ERICKSON HALL


$251,984

0131 - FIRE STATION

(#DEF006640) REPLACE ROOF #4 $20,726

$20,726


(#DEF009169) EXTERIOR RESTORATION AND CAULKING $150,000

$150,000


(#DEF006642) REPLACE ROOF #9 $33,162

$33,162


0029 - KEDZIE HALL

568 - REFRIGERATION

(#DEF008103) REPLACE ROOF SPLIT AC 6 $35,525

$35,525


(#DEF001423) REPLACE WINDOWS $1,070,745

$1,070,745

0180 - NATURAL RESOURCES

(#DEF004021) REPLACE EXTERIOR DOORS/ JAMBS/ AND HARDWARE (6-OHD) (16 ENTRY) $163,044

$163,044


(#DEF000782) EXTERIOR MASONRY RESTORATION $66,601

$66,601



$179,988


(#DEF003517) REPLACE ROOFS 20, 24, 25, 29 (GLASS FELTS) $720,942

$720,942

Subtotal for FY 2017: $3,475,704

2018


0028 - GILTNER HALL

(#DEF004362) WINDOWS - CI $54,418 $54,418


(#DEF004255) DOORS - EXTERIOR - ED $143,991

$143,991

0150 - KRESGE ART


$44,997


(#DEF004548) REPLACE ALUMINUM ENTRANCE DOORS, FRAMES AND HARDWARE ( EXCLUDING DOCK ENTRY) $58,230

$58,230

0445A - THAYER HOUSE


$27,646

0446A - VET RESEARCH - LARGE ANIMAL


$35,998

0446B - VET RESEARCH - ROUND ROOF

(#DEF004669) RECOAT ROUND ROOF BARN 446B. $42,425

$42,425

Subtotal for FY 2018: $407,704


2019

0069 - BRESLIN

(#DEF001036) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT ROOF #3,4,5,6 $77,368

$77,368


(#DEF004386) DOORS - EXTERIOR - BD $29,998

$29,998

0154 - MANLY MILES

(#DEF004067) REPLACE ALUMINUM ENTRANCE DOORS, FRAMES, GLAZING AND HARDWARE $29,115

$29,115

0047 - OLDS HALL

(#DEF006645) REPLACE ROOF #1, 2 AND 3 $220,735

$220,735

0093 - PLANT SCIENCE GREENHOUSE-WEST

(#DEF004468) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004467) WINDOWS - FRN $49,042

(#DEF004466) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004464) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004463) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004462) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004461) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004460) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004459) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004469) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042


(#DEF004470) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004471) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004472) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

(#DEF004465) WINDOWS - GRN $49,042

$686,593

0446B - VET RESEARCH - ROUND ROOF

(#DEF000971) REPLACE EXTERIOR DOORS $23,665

$23,665


2020

(#DEF000050) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT BLDG 471 - ROOF #A-2, A-1, C, H, K $333,381

$333,381

0009 - COWLES HOUSE

(#DEF007131) REPLACE OR REPAIR ROOFS 3,4,5,6,7 AND 9. $159,863

$159,863

0028 - GILTNER HALL

(#DEF004360) WINDOWS - CI $30,606

$30,606


(#DEF001454) REPLACE WINDOWS IN OFFICE WING - PHASE 2 - SOUTHEAST ELEVATION, SOUTH HALF $155,845

(#DEF001455) REPLACE WINDOWS IN OFFICE WING - PHASE 3 - NORTHEAST ELEVATION $43,956

(#DEF001453) REPLACE WINDOWS IN OFFICE WING - PHASE 1, SOUTHEAST ELEVATION, NORTH HALF AND MAIN ENTRY $216,818

$416,620


0446F - VET RESEARCH - GERM FREE BARN


$62,996


20210028 - GILTNER HALL

(#DEF000338) WINDOWS - REPLACE ALL OLD WOOD WINDOWS (-495) $1,281,058

$1,281,058


Subtotal for Building Envelope: $49,992,670


Building Interior

20160133 - ANGELL UNIV SERVICES

368 - LOCKS & RELATED HARDWARE (#DEF003469) REPLACE EXTERIOR DOOR HARDWARE AND SELECTED INTERIOR DOORS. $29,581

$29,581

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003524) REPLACE SELECTED MENS AND WOMENS RESTROOM DOORS AND HARDWARE $35,497

$35,497

381 - CEILING (#DEF003463) REPLACE CORRIDOR CEILINGS & LIGHTING $177,485

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003523) REPLACE 24 BATHROOM DOORS AND HARDWARE ON THE CLASSROOM WING. $21,298

$198,783

0080 - BUSINESS COLLEGE

381 - CEILING (#DEF003869) REPLACE CEILINGS AND LIGHT FIXTURES IN PUBLIC AREA CORRIDORS $354,970

382 - FLOORS (#DEF003872) REPLACE LANDING FLOORING AND TREADS AND RISERS IN TWO (2) STAIRWELLS $26,031

$381,001

0181A - CENTER INTEGRATIVE PLANT SYS-LAB

382 - FLOORS (#DEF003787) REPLACE CORRIDOR FLOORING AND WALL BASE ON BASEMENT AND 2ND FLOORS. INCLUDE STAIRWELL LANDINGS.



363 - PAINTING - INTERIOR

(#DEF000093) INTERIOR PAINTING - REPAINT HALLWAYS AND HIGH USE ROOMS $53,281

$53,281


381 - CEILING

(#DEF000142) REPLACE EXTERIOR OVERHANG AND CEILING AT NORTH ENTRANCE $174,690

384 - CEILING TILES (#DEF000141) REPLACE CEILING TILE AND GRID IN ENTIRE BUILDING $946,585

382 - FLOORS (#DEF003834) REPLACE CARPET AND FLOOR TILE IN ENTIRE BUILDING $887,424

$2,008,699


382 - FLOORS (#DEF003396) REPLACE FLOORING IN BALLROOM WITH INTERLOCKING TILE $76,910

$76,910

0081 - ENGINEERING

381 - CEILING (#DEF003901) REPLACE OLD METAL PAN CEILINGS AND LIGHTING IN STAIRWELLS OF OLD ENGINEERING WING $23,292

$23,292


382 - FLOORS (#DEF003910) REPLACE LANDING FLOORING, STAIR TREADS AND RISERS IN (2) TWO STAIRWELLS $58,230

$58,230

0091 - FARRALL HALL

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003909) INTERIOR DOOR/ FRAME/ HARDWARE REPLACEMENTS IN BASEMENT LEVEL $43,672

382 - FLOORS (#DEF008622) BASEMENT CORRIDOR - NEW FLOORING AND LIGHTING $32,000


369 - WALLS

(#DEF001058) REPAIR PLASTER AROUND WINDOW WALL AREAS (NO THERMAL BREAK) AND REPAIR INTERIOR MASONRY $93,241

$168,913

0327 - FEE HALL

381 - CEILING (#DEF003503) REPLACE CEILINGS AND LIGHTING IN PUBLIC CORRIDORS AND RESTROOMS FLOORS 2-6. $212,982

382 - FLOORS (#DEF000306) FLOOR COVERING - REPLACE OR REPAIR IN STAIRWELLS $221,274

369 - WALLS

(#DEF001011) PLASTER CONDITIONS - PLASTER REPAIRS IN EAST, WEST AND CENTER STAIRWELLS $55,291

$489,547

0179 - FOOD SCIENCE

363 - PAINTING - INTERIOR (#DEF003903) PATCH AND PAINT EAST AND WEST STAIRWELLS $34,938

$34,938

0176 - GEOGRAPHY

381 - CEILING (#DEF003904) REPLACE CORRIDOR AND REST ROOM CEILINGS AND LIGHTING $87,345

$87,345

0028 - GILTNER HALL

381 - CEILING (#DEF000334) CEILINGS - REPLACE VARIOUS LAB ROOM CEILINGS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BUILDING $133,201

$133,201


381 - CEILING (#DEF003507) REPLACE CEILINGS AND LIGHTING IN CORRIDORS $78,093

(#DEF007968) DEMO 30'X50' 12"X12" VINYL TILE & REPLACE CEILING W/ 2'X2' DROP CEILING $42,630

382 - FLOORS (#DEF003509) REPLACE STAIR TREADS, RISERS, STRINGERS AND LANDING FLOORING $29,581


(#DEF000409) REPLACE FLOOR IN DANCE STUDIO AND 2ND FLOOR GYM $266,403

$416,707


382 - FLOORS

(#DEF004006) REPLACE FLOORING ON RUNNING TRACK. APPROXIMATELY 7000 SQFT $64,053

(#DEF004007) SAND AND REFINSH WOOD FLOORS IN 2 GYMS AND EXTERIOR ROOM ( APPROXIMATELY 32,000SQ FT) $45,000

363 - PAINTING - INTERIOR (#DEF000413) PAINT ENTIRE FACILITY $86,581

$195,634


381 - CEILING (#DEF003478) REPLACE CEILING AND LIGHTING IN 2ND FLOOR GYMNASIUM $88,742

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003993) REPLACE DOORS IN TURF ARENA (3 PAIR ENTRY DOORS AND 2 EXTERIOR ROLL UP DOORS) $20,963

(#DEF000421) INTERIOR DOORS - SELECTED OFFICE AND COURTS $39,960

382 - FLOORS (#DEF000427) REPLACE GYM FLOOR - ROOM 10 $133,201

(#DEF004785) REPLACE EXISTING WOOD FLOORING IN 9 RACKETBALL COURTS $122,006

(#DEF003347) REPLACE GYM FLOORS - ROOMS 230 AND 233 $266,403

363 - PAINTING - INTERIOR (#DEF004783) PREP AND PAINT WALLS IN RACKETBALL COURTS $34,938

369 - WALLS (#DEF000424) REPAIR RACKETBALL BALL COURT WALLS $124,358

$830,571

0169 - INTERNATIONAL CENTER

381 - CEILING (#DEF003987) REPLACE 12" X 12" CEILING TILE AND LIGHTING WITH NEW SUSPENDED CEILING AND LIGHTING $41,926

370 - RAILINGS, PARTITIONS, CHALKBOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, SHELVING (#DEF000386) REST ROOM PARTITIONS - REPLACE $33,300

$75,226



382 - FLOORS

(#DEF000452) REPLACE WOOD FLOOR IN NORTH UPPER GYM $266,403

370 - RAILINGS, PARTITIONS, CHALKBOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, SHELVING (#DEF004892) REPLACE OLD STEEL TOILET PARTITIONS $27,729

$294,131

0029 - KEDZIE HALL

381 - CEILING

(#DEF003885) CEILING REPLACEMENTS IN CORRIDORS OF 1ST, 2ND AND 3RD FLOORS OF NORTH WING $93,268

382 - FLOORS (#DEF004000) REPLACE STAIRTREADS/ RISERS AND LANDING MATERIAL IN STAIRWELL $58,230

370 - RAILINGS, PARTITIONS, CHALKBOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, SHELVING (#DEF003860) REPLACE MARBLE TOILET PARTITIONS WITH NEW STAINLESS STEEL

$192,911

0150 - KRESGE ART

381 - CEILING (#DEF003452) REPLACE 12 X 12 CEILING TILE AND LIGHTING IN CORRIDORS $249,557

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF004003) REPLACE LAMINATE CLAD INTERIOR DOORS FROM HALLWAYS TO OFFICES AND CLASSROOMS THROUGHOUT BLDG $109,472

382 - FLOORS (#DEF003451) REPLACE 9X9 ASBESTOS FLOOR TILE IN CORRIDORS $118,323

(#DEF004005) REPLACE STAIRTREADS/ RISERS AND LANDINGS FLOORING IN 2 STAIRWELLS $34,938

363 - PAINTING - INTERIOR (#DEF000474) INTERIOR PAINTING - REPAINT HALLWAYS AND STAIRWELLS $38,862

370 - RAILINGS, PARTITIONS, CHALKBOARDS, BULLETIN BOARDS, SHELVING (#DEF004004) REPLACE RECESS IN WALL METAL LOCKERS IN CORRIDORS (APPROXIMATELY 370) $55,901

$607,053


0014 - LINTON HALL

384 - CEILING TILES

(#DEF000507) REPLACE CEILINGS AS NECESSARY $70,994

382 - FLOORS (#DEF003462) REPLACE FLOOR TILE IN PUBLIC AREA HALLWAYS, RESTROOMS & STAIR TREADS/RISERS $100,575

$171,569

0011 - MUSIC

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR

(#DEF003636) DOORS - INTERIOR $281,982

(#DEF000584) INTERIOR DOORS - REPLACE SOME OLD DOORS AT BASEMENT AND 1ST FLOOR, INCLUDING HARDWARE $29,115

382 - FLOORS (#DEF000577) FLOOR COVERING - REPLACE FLOORING AT BASEMENT LEVEL $99,901

(#DEF004103) REPLACE VINYL FLOORING AND WALL BASE ON 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR COORIDORS INCLUDING ROOM 120 $93,168

$504,166


382 - FLOORS (#DEF000588) FLOOR COVERING - REPLACE FRONT STAIRWELL AND LANDINGS $99,901

$99,901


384 - CEILING TILES (#DEF000613) REPLACE DAMAGED/OUTDATED CEILING TILE AND LIGHTING $199,802

$199,802

0024 - NATURAL SCIENCE

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF000630) INTERIOR DOORS - REPAIR DOORS AND HARDWARE, BASEMENT THROUGH 4TH FLOOR $99,901

382 - FLOORS

(#DEF000620) FLOOR COVERING - REPLACE DETERIORATED FLOOR TILE $291,643

$391,544



381 - CEILING

(#DEF003518) REPLACE OLD 12X12 STICK-ON CEILING TILE IN PUBLIC HALLWAYS (APPROX 12,000 SQ FT) $113,590 382 - FLOORS

(#DEF003520) REPLACE CORRIDOR FLOOR TILE AND WALL BASE ALL FLOORS (APPROX. 20,000 SQ FT) $141,988

$255,578


363 - PAINTING - INTERIOR (#DEF002346) INTERIOR PAINTING WALL AREAS WHERE NEEDED $66,601

$66,601


363 - PAINTING - INTERIOR (#DEF000781) PAINT MAIN LOBBY AND HALLWAYS $46,077

$46,077


381 - CEILING (#DEF004558) CORRIDOR CEILING AND LIGHTING REPLACEMENTS ON 1ST, 2ND & 3RD FLOORS $139,752

$139,752


384 - CEILING TILES (#DEF000951) CEILINGS - REPLACE ALL CEILINGS IN BASEMENT A WING. $131,239

$131,239

0008 - WILLS HOUSE

369 - WALLS (#DEF004555) INTERIORS RENOVATIONS AND UPGRADES STAIRS, DOORS,TRIM, FLOORING, PATCH AND PAINT $104,814

$104,814


2017


0201 - CLINICAL CENTER-OFFICE/LAB

381 - CEILING

(#DEF003863) REPLACE CEILING TILE IN ENTIRE OFFICE WING $59,162 $59,162


384 - CEILING TILES

(#DEF000358) CEILINGS - REPLACE CEILINGS IN ENTIRE BUILDING $841,674

$841,674

0013 - MUSEUM

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003732) DOORS - INTERIOR $77,995

$77,995

0177 - PACKAGING

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF004190) REPLACE APPROXIMATELY (23) INTERIOR BIRCH VENEER DOORS AND HARDWARE $32,609

$32,609


383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF004560) REPLACE INTERIOR DOORS AND HARDWARE TO OFFICES AND CLOSETS $582,299

$582,299


2018

0014 - LINTON HALL

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF000502) INTERIOR DOORS - REPLACE SELECTED INTERIOR DOORS AND HARDWARE $46,077

$46,077

0154 - MANLY MILES

382 - FLOORS


(#DEF004078) STAIRWELL TREADS AND LIGHTING FLOORING REPLACEMENT $29,115 $29,115


381 - CEILING

(#DEF004108) REPLACE CEILING AND LIGHTING IN PUBLIC CORRIDORS AND STAIRWELLS $75,699

384 - CEILING TILES (#DEF000592) CEILINGS - CEILING TILE REPLACEMENT $30,718

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF004107) REPLACE STAIRWELL FIRE DOORS AND HARDWARE $34,938

382 - FLOORS (#DEF004106) REPLACE STAIR TREADS/ RISERS AND LANDING MATERIAL IN BACK STAIRWELL $87,345

(#DEF004105) REPALCE CORRIDOR FLOORING AND WALL BASE $89,674

$318,374


384 - CEILING TILES (#DEF000731) REPLACE CEILING TILE IN BUILDING, 20,000 SQ. FT. $189,568

$189,568



(#DEF004474) DOORS - INTERIOR - IND $23,998



$95,994


383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF004334) DOORS - INTERIOR - IND $20,999

$20,999

CX0170 - VETERINARY MEDICAL CENTER COMPLEX

382 - FLOORS


(#DEF004579) REPLACE ORIGINAL 9X9 FLOOR TILE IN HALLWAYS AND PUBLIC AREAS OF `A` BUILDING. $349,379 $349,379


2019

0132 - ANTHONY HALL

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003581) DOORS - INTERIOR $2,108,864

$2,108,864

0179 - FOOD SCIENCE

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003902) REPLACE INTERIOR LAMINATE CLAD OFFICE DOORS & HARDWARE AS NECESSARY $291,150

$291,150


381 - CEILING (#DEF003508) REPLACE METAL PAN CEILING ABOVE POOL (RM 20) $552,912

$552,912

0154 - MANLY MILES

381 - CEILING (#DEF004069) INSTALL NEW SUSPENDED CEILINGS AND LIGHTING IN BLDG $465,839

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF004079) REPLACE STAIRWELL FIRE DOORS AND HARDWARE, LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT BY YEAR 2019 $23,292

$489,131

0177 - PACKAGING

382 - FLOORS (#DEF004189) REPLACE CORRIDOR FLOOR TILE IN ORIGINAL BUILDING $41,926

$41,926



2020

0163 - CHEMISTRY

382 - FLOORS (#DEF003868) REPLACE LANDING FLOORING AND TREADS AND RISERS IN THREE (3) STAIRWELLS $141,988

$141,988

0131 - FIRE STATION


$104,993


381 - CEILING (#DEF003980) REPLACE CEILING AND LIGHTING IN BUILDINGS CORRIDORS $76,863

383 - DOORS - INTERIOR (#DEF003985) REPLACE SELECTED HALLWAY ROOM DOORS AND HARDWARE AS NECESSARY (APPROXIMATELY 40) $69,876

$146,739


2021


382 - FLOORS (#DEF003864) REPLACE FLOOR TILE AND WALL BASE IN CORRIDORS OF OFFICE WING $82,826

$82,826


Subtotal for Building Interior: $15,147,676


Building Systems

20163000 - ALL CAMPUS BUILDINGS

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF007866) REPLACE CLOGGED HOT WATER HEAT SYSTEM STEAM BUNDLES IN OLDEST BUILDINGS. $30,450

(#DEF007867) REPLACE CLOGGED HOT WATER HEAT SYSTEM STEAM BUNDLES IN OLDEST BUILDINGS. $40,000

(#DEF007865) REPLACE CLOGGED HOT WATER HEAT SYSTEM STEAM BUNDLES IN OLDEST BUILDINGS. $40,000

461 - HVAC CONTROLS (#DEF009205) UPGRADE OBSOLETE SIEMENS MBC CONTROL PANELS IN MULTIPLE BUILDINGS, PHASE 2 OF 6. $400,000

(#DEF009203) UPGRADE OBSOLETE SIEMENS MBC CONTROL PANELS IN MULTIPLE BUILDINGS, PHASE 1 OF 6. $400,000

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF002555) UPGRADE AND REFURBISH LOW VOLTAGE BREAKERS IN 32 BUILDINGS - PHASE 6 $266,403

(#DEF002554) UPGRADE AND REFURBISH LOW VOLTAGE BREAKERS IN 32 BUILDINGS - PHASE 5 $266,403

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES(#DEF007846) FACILITY UPGRADE - MODERNIZE RESTROOMS $1,421,000

266 - SHEET METAL (#DEF002901) REPLACE COOLING COIL DRAIN PANS IN AHU`S OF OLDER CAMPUS BUILDINGS, PHASE 3 OF 5 $60,759

(#DEF002902) REPLACE COOLING COIL DRAIN PANS IN AHU`S OF OLDER CAMPUS BUILDINGS, PHASE 4OF 5 $60,759

(#DEF002903) REPLACE COOLING COIL DRAIN PANS IN AHU`S OF OLDER CAMPUS BUILDINGS, PHASE 5 OF 5 $60,759

$3,046,532


278 - FURNACE - BOILERS (#DEF006031) REPLACE 3 BOILERS $182,700

$182,700

0132 - ANTHONY HALL

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF009210) REPLACE CONDENSATE RECIEVER AND REPIPE STEAM COIL IN SB RM. 245

126 - WATER TREATMENT (#DEF010836) REFURBISH COOLING TOWERS 1 & 2 SERVING ABSORPTION CHILLERS $150,000

$230,000


566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF000043) REPLACE STAGE LIFT ELEVATOR $921,541

$921,541

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES

(#DEF004014) REPLACE LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, TOILET FLUSH VALVES, URINAL FLUSH VALVES, AND TOILET SEATS $40,000

$40,000

464 - CHILLER (#DEF000061) REPLACE MECHANICAL CHILLER $262,035

$262,035

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF007936) BASEMENT AIR PLENUMS-REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS PIPE INSULATIONS & REINSULATE WITH NON-ASBESTOS. $126,875

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF003952) REPLACE STEAM DOMESTIC WATER HEATER $58,230

$185,105

0168 - BIOCHEMISTRY

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF007881) REPLACE TOILETS, FLUSH VALVES, TOILET SEATS, URINALS, & URINAL FLUSH VALVES $45,675

(#DEF003960) REPLACE LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, TOILET AND URINAL FLUSH VALVES IN PUBLIC RESTROOMS $29,115

$74,790

0069 - BRESLIN

463 - COOLING TOWERS (#DEF000080) COOLING TOWERS $203,000

270 - WATER SOFTENERS(#DEF003966) REPLACE WATER SOFTENER SYSTEM $81,522

$284,522



258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS

(#DEF005171) REPLACE DOMESTIC STEAM WATER HEATER IN BASEMENT MR-B1 $55,291 467 - VAV SYSTEM

(#DEF002172) VAV SYSTEM $1,439,597

$1,494,888

0181A - CENTER INTEGRATIVE PLANT SYS-LAB

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF004053) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER HEATERS IN WEST BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM $116,460

579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF005276) REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM $455,979

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF004048) REPLACE STEAM PRV STATION LOCATED IN THE WEST BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM NEAR THE WATER HEATERS $34,938

(#DEF004049) REPLACE STEAM PRV STATION LOCATED IN THE PENTHOUSE MECHANICAL ROOM $40,761

(#DEF004052) REPLACE CONDENSATE RETURN UNIT IN MECH ROOM B-13 $46,584

(#DEF004054) REPLACE STEAM PRV STATION LOCATED IN THE WEST BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM NEAR THE WEST END $58,230

(#DEF004051) REPLACE CONDENSATE DUPLEX PUMPS IN WEST BASEMENT MECH ROOM $46,584

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004097) REPLACE COOLING COIL IN HVAC #1 LOCATED IN PENTHOUSE $40,761

(#DEF004099) REPLACE COOLING COIL IN HVAC #2 LOCATED IN PENTHOUSE $40,761

262 - PUMPS (#DEF010835) REPLACE (4) HOT WATER HEAT CIRCULATING PUMPS AND ASSOCIATED ISOLATION VALVES

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF004551) REPLACE ORIGINAL DUPLEX WATER SOFTNER SYSTEM IN BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM - B-14 $40,761

$971,818


278 - FURNACE - BOILERS (#DEF006036) CENTRAL SCHOOLS BOILER 1, 2 AND 3 REPLACEMENT $127,964

$127,964




(#DEF001013) REPLACE DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATER IN MR3 - $61,436 566 - ELEVATOR

(#DEF005332) REPLACE ELEVATOR 2 $266,592

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS(#DEF000108) REPLACE AND UPGRADE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND LIGHTING PANELS $264,175

(#DEF001066) REPLACE ALL OLD LIGHTING PANELS $178,165

(#DEF003744) REPLACE ROOFS 6, 8, 9 $99,814

$870,182

0163 - CHEMISTRY

566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF005371) REPLACE ELEVATOR 3 $53,318

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF002656) REMOVE DI-ELECTRIC UNIONS AND REPLACE WITH BRASS UNIONS OR WATER WAYS - 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS. $24,304

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF007681) REPLACE COOLING COILS IN HVAC-2 LOCATED IN SB OF CHEMISTRY $507,500

(#DEF007680) REPLACE COOLING COILS IN HVAC-1 LOCATED IN SB OF CHEMISTRY $507,500

$1,092,622

0202 - CLINICAL CENTER-ANIMAL

566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF005393) REPLACE ELEVATOR C2 $159,955

(#DEF005392) REPLACE ELEVATOR C1 $159,955

$319,910


566 - ELEVATOR(#DEF005388) REPLACE ELEVATOR B2 $159,955

(#DEF005387) REPLACE ELEVATOR A1 $159,955

(#DEF005389) REPLACE ELEVATOR C3 $159,955


(#DEF005390) REPLACE ELEVATOR D4 $159,955

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS

(#DEF004602) REPLACE 10 INCH BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND SHUTOFF VALVES WHERE DOMESTIC COLD WATER ENTERS THE BUILDING $88,731

$728,552


566 - ELEVATOR

(#DEF005391) REPLACE DUAL SYSTEM ELEVATORS B1 & B2 $853,095

$853,095


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004098) CONVERT AHU 1 AND 2 TO STANDARD MIXED AIR SYSTEMS, $116,460

$116,460


885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF007969) BASEMENT AIR PLENUMS-REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS PIPE INSULATIONS & RE-INSULATE W/ NON-ASBESTOS. $101,500

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF000166) REPLACE 13 BRANCH CIRCUIT PANELS $88,742

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004656) REPLACE ALL HOT AND COLD WATER SHUT OFF VALVES AND RE-INSULATE. $83,186

$273,428

0328 - CONRAD HALL

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF000184) REPLACE BOOSTER COIL VALVES $133,623

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF000182) REPLACE OLD LIGHTING PANELS $32,254

$165,877

0009 - COWLES HOUSE

567 - FREON AIR CONDITIONING (#DEF002401) REPLACE CHILLER $32,480


261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING

(#DEF006951) INSTALL ADDITIONAL HOT WATER HEATING SYSTEM CONTROL VALVES AND THERMOSTATS $76,125 461 - HVAC CONTROLS

(#DEF002386) REPLACE EXISTING HVAC CONTROLS WITH NEW DDC CONTROLS $315,643

$424,248

0213 - CROP SCIENCE-FIELD LAB

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004743) REPLACE RESTROOM FAUCETS AND TRIM, FLUSH VALVES, TOILET SEATS AND LABORATORY FAUCETS $27,729

467 - VAV SYSTEM (#DEF003717) VAV SYSTEM $262,483

$290,212

0164 - CYCLOTRON


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF003586) HVAC EQUIPMENT $226,485

$610,461

0215 - DCPAH-DIAG CNTR POP ANIM HEALTH

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF007955) REPLACE HUMIDIFICATION SYSTEMS IN AHU'S 1 & 3 $91,350

$91,350


258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF004749) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER HEATER IN MECH ROOM 3 $55,457

(#DEF000218) REPLACE DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATER $61,436

(#DEF004750) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER HEATER IN MECH ROOM 2 $55,457

272 - HEAT EXCHANGERS (#DEF000229) REPLACE OBSOLETE HEATING AND VENTILATING UNITS, CONTROL VALVES, AND TRAPS $307,180


563 - LIGHTING FIXTURES

(#DEF000217) UPGRADE ARENA AUDIENCE LIGHTING $115,193 (#DEF000216) REPLACE OLD INCANDESCENT FIXTURES WITH NEW FLUORESCENT- FOR CLASS ROOMS, OUTSIDE AND STORAGE AREA $47,613


(#DEF004747) REPLACE LAVATORIES, FAUCETS TRIM, TOILETS, URINALS, FLUSH VALVES.... $55,457

277 - UNIT HEATERS - NATURAL GAS OR HOT WATER (#DEF000220) REPLACE UNIT HEATERS IN OLD HOCKEY RINK $69,116

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF004748) REPLACE WATER SOFTENER SYSTEM IN EAST MECH ROOM 3 $55,457

$822,366

0203A - ENG RESEARCH COMPLEX

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF005121) REPLACE DOMESTIC STEAM WATER HEATER IN MR- B105 PENTHOUSE $55,291


563 - LIGHTING FIXTURES (#DEF003709) LIGHTING FIXTURES $556,464

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF005122) REPLACE DOMESTIC COLD WATER METER AND ISOLATION VALVES IN MR-B105 $27,646

$1,422,710

0081 - ENGINEERING

464 - CHILLER (#DEF007687) REPLACE 2 CHILLERS AND COOLING TOWERS $20,000,000

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF004998) REPLACE ORIGINAL STEAM WATER HEATER IN MECH RM MR-21 $66,548

566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF002209) ELEVATORS (0081-ELEVTR-04 AND 0081-ELEVTR-05) $853,095

(#DEF000242) COMPLETE OVERHAUL OF OLD FREIGHT ELEVATOR, CONVERT TO PASSENGER ELEVATOR $466,204

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF003884) REPLACEMENT OF CONDENSATE RECEIVER LOCATED IN THE BASEMENT HALLWAY $25,621

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004997) REPLACE LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, TOILET FLUSH VALVES AND SEATS, AND URINALS IN ORIGINAL BUILDING $38,820


467 - VAV SYSTEM

(#DEF003659) VAV SYSTEM $902,942

$22,353,230


261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF007935) REPLACE HEATING PLANT IN MECHANICAL ROOM 20 $101,500

(#DEF007934) REPLACE TWO BUNDLES IN THE NORTH BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM HTX. REPLACE EXPANSION TANK IN PENTHOUSE. $50,750

(#DEF007970) REPLACE STEAM COIL, VALVES, TRAPS ON HVAC #2 IN NORTH BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM $30,450

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF005075) REPLACE URINAL AND TOILET FLUSH VALVES $38,704


(#DEF005074) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER AND ISOLATION VALVES (SOUTH SIDE OF MR-13) $33,175

$254,579

0091 - FARRALL HALL

579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF005283) UPGRADE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM $373,073

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF000282) REPLACE OBSOLETE FIXTURES AND BRANCH CIRCUIT WIRING $562,140

(#DEF000284) REPLACE LIGHTING AND POWER DISTRIBUTION PANELS $51,816

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF005073) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER AND ISOLATION VALVES (MR-4) $33,175

$1,020,204

0327 - FEE HALL

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF002534) REMOVE SPRAY-ON FIREPROOFING IN MR-E15 AND MR-B2 AND REINSULATE $176,760

566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF000301) REPLACE HYDRAULIC FREIGHT ELEVATOR 5 $333,003

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF005115) REPLACE TOILET AND URINAL FLUSH VALVES, FAUCETS, TRAPS, DRAINS IN PUBLIC RESTROOMS $49,762


$559,525

0131 - FIRE STATION


(#DEF010791) REPLACE THE CONDENSATES RETURN DUPLEX UNIT IN THE BASEMENT MECH ROOM $40,000

$40,000

0179 - FOOD SCIENCE

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004157) REPLACE AHU-1 AND EF-6 $232,920

564 - SECURITY & EMERGENCY SYSTEMS/TIME CLOCKS (#DEF009002) REPLACE ONE 15 KW EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHTING UPS SYSTEM $35,000

$267,920

0171 - FOOD STORES

262 - PUMPS (#DEF010632) REPLACE PRIMARY HEATING WATER CIRCULATING PUMP 2 $24,000

$24,000

0176 - GEOGRAPHY

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF004070) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER HEATER $58,230

272 - HEAT EXCHANGERS (#DEF000776) REPLACE HOT WATER HEATING CONVERTER TUBE BUNDLES AND HEATING PUMPS. $38,398

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF008971) REPLACE BOOSTER COIL VALVES IN CEILINGS $220,000

$316,627

0028 - GILTNER HALL

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF007898) BASEMENT AIR PLENUMS-REMOVE ALL PIPE INSULATION ON UTILITY PIPING & REINSULATE W/ NON-ASBESTOS INSUL $152,250


465 - CENTRAL CONTROL

(#DEF000337) CONNECT TO CENTRAL CONTROL $460,770 258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS

(#DEF005125) REPLACE DOMESTIC STEAM WATER HEATER IN MR-35 $55,291

(#DEF005127) REPLACE DOMESTIC STEAM WATER HEATER IN MR-22 $55,291

566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF002201) ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT $426,547

(#DEF002200) ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT $266,592

(#DEF002196) ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT $266,592


272 - HEAT EXCHANGERS (#DEF000335) REPLACE HEATING COILS IN HV1 AND HV2 $307,180

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF006603) REPLACE STEAM PRV SYSTEM IN MR 36 $207,263

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF010908) REPLACE AHU WITH THE SITE BUILT UNIT

562 - MOTORS, CONTROLS, & ELECTRICAL EQ. (#DEF000327) REPLACE 480 VOLT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, MOTOR STARTERS $712,658

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF005126) REPLACE ALL RESTROOM URINALS WITH 1/8 GAL. FLUSH URINALS. $44,233

(#DEF005128) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM TOILETS, TOILET SEATS AND FLUSH VALVES $49,762

(#DEF005129) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM LAVATORIES. $38,704

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF003889) REPLACE WATER SOFTENER CONTROLS $27,729

$3,572,410


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF000354) REPLACE CEILING AND ADD NEW DUCT WORK - ROOMS 50 & 60 $284,142

$284,142



566 - ELEVATOR

(#DEF003731) REPLACE ELEVATOR 1 $473,293 262 - PUMPS

(#DEF009054) REPLACE, RELOCATE, AND RE-PIPE FIRE PUMP AND CONTROLLER

$553,293


566 - ELEVATOR(#DEF003650) REPLACE ELEVATOR 1 $295,808

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF000406) REPLACE OUTSIDE AIR DAMPERS $72,187

563 - LIGHTING FIXTURES (#DEF000405) REPLACE BATTERY OPERATED EM LIGHTS $207,263

$575,258


885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF000415) REMOVE ASBESTOS ACOUSICAL PLASTER $287,213

567 - FREON AIR CONDITIONING (#DEF000414) REPLACE AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR ROOM 231 BY CONNECTING TO NEW CHILLER SYSTEM $99,901

272 - HEAT EXCHANGERS(#DEF000433) REPLACE 3 HOT WATER HEATING CONVERTERS $69,116

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF002758) REPLACE DETERIORATED DUCTWORK ABOVE CEILINGS AT ROOMS 138 & 140. $48,607

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF005573) REPLACE 20 ORIGINAL HOT AND COLD WATER SHUT OFF VALVES $42,655

277 - UNIT HEATERS - NATURAL GAS OR HOT WATER (#DEF000428) REPLACE CABINET HEATERS NORTH ENTRANCE $23,665

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF002669) REPLACE WATER SOFTENER SYSTEM AND NECESSARY PIPING IN MAIN BASEMENT MR $182,277

$753,433


566 - ELEVATOR


(#DEF000701) REPLACE ELEVATOR AND CONVERT TO PASSENGER/FREIGHT $499,168 261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING

(#DEF008969) REPLACE CONDENSTATE PUMPS 1 & 2

$549,168

0169 - INTERNATIONAL CENTER

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL(#DEF007967) BASEMENT AIR PLENUMS-REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS PIPE INSULATIONS & RE-INSULATE W/ NON-ASBESTOS. $60,900

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF003837) REPLACE TWO DOMESTIC WATER HEATERS IN THE MAIN BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM. $110,914


272 - HEAT EXCHANGERS (#DEF000387) REPLACE CONDENSATE RECEIVER IN MR 8 $65,078

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF005018) REPLACE LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, TOILET FLUSH VALVES AND TOILET SEATS, AND URINAL FLUSH VALVES. $27,729

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF005017) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER AND ISOLATION VALVES IN THE MAIN MECH ROOM. $27,729

$546,099


263 - AIR COMPRESSORS (#DEF010808) REPLACE CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR (DUPLEX 200GAL 7.5HP) $30,000

461 - HVAC CONTROLS (#DEF004888) UPGRADE PNEUMATIC CONTROLS TO DDC ON ALL VENTILATION UNITS SERVING FIELDHOUSE AND... $77,640

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004725) REPLACE URINALS, TOILETS, LAVATORIES, AND WATER COOLERS IN PUBLIC RESTROOMS... $105,368

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004727) REPLACE ALL ORIGINAL EXPOSED SANITARY WASTE PIPING $221,828

(#DEF004729) REPLACE ORIGINAL STORM WASTE PIPING... $221,828


(#DEF005574) REPLACE ALL DETERIORATED UNDERGROUND SANITARY AND STORM WASTE PIPING $880,868

$1,537,533

0029 - KEDZIE HALL

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF007966) BASEMENT AIR PLENUMS-REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS PIPE INSULATIONS & RE-INSULATE W/ NON ASBESTOS. $71,050

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004936) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM,... $27,729

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004935) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER $33,274

$132,053

0150 - KRESGE ART

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF006667) REPLACE HOT WATER HEATING SYSTEM $2,072,630

$2,072,630

0049 - LIBRARY

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF005144) REPLACE DOMESTIC STEAM WATER HEATER IN BASEMENT MR WB-12 $55,291

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF005143) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER AND ISOLATION VALVES ON MAIN COLD WATER PIPING IN BASEMENT MR WB-12 $27,646

$82,937

0183 - LIFE SCIENCE

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF007937) REMOVE SPRAY ON ASBESTOS INSULATION FROM UTILITY PIPING & RE-INSULATE. $406,000

(#DEF000497) ABATE SPRAY-ON FIREPROOFING IN PLENUMS, PIPE CHASE, PIPE JOINTS AND REINSULATE $767,951

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF004586) REPLACE TWO ORIGINAL STEAM WATER HEATERS $166,371

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004585) REPLACE ALL PUBLIC RESTROOM LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, $33,274


262 - PUMPS

(#DEF004191) REPLACE HEAT PUMPS #5, #6, AND #7 IN THE NORTH A-WING PENTHOSUE. $75,699 (#DEF009052) REPLACE FIRE PUMP AND CONTROLLER $45,000

564 - SECURITY & EMERGENCY SYSTEMS/TIME CLOCKS

(#DEF009003) UPGRADE EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHTING SYSTEM BY CONNECTING TO BOTT NURSING ADDITION $90,000

$1,584,295

0068 - LINEN SERVICES


$253,750

0014 - LINTON HALL

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF000508) REPLACE DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATER $53,245


$106,564

0154 - MANLY MILES

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF000516) REMOVE ASBESTOS SPRAY-ON FIREPROOFING $176,629

262 - PUMPS (#DEF000514) REPLACE 6 INDUCTION PUMPS

$256,629

0059 - MUNN ICE ARENA

566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF004934) REPLACE FREIGHT ELEVATOR HYDRAULICS, CONTROLLER AND WORN CAR PARTS. $277,285

$277,285

0013 - MUSEUM


579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS


(#DEF005294) REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IN MUSEUM $219,672 462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT

(#DEF004001) REPLACE EF-1, EF-1A, EF-1B, EF-1D, EF-2, EF-2A, SF-1, SF-1A $698,759

(#DEF003513) REPLACE VENTILATION FOR MAIN GALLERY ROOM 105 AND HERITAGE GALLERY ROOM 106 $1,017,579

$2,202,602

0011 - MUSIC

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF004633) REMOVE AND REPLACE ALL AIR DUCTS IN THE ORIGINAL PART OF THE BUILDING. $499,114

567 - FREON AIR CONDITIONING (#DEF000571) REPLACE 2 AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS WITH CHILLER $1,397,518

$1,896,632


261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF011195) REPLACE 2 HOT WATER HEATING SYSTEMS $120,000

$120,000


258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF000614) REPLACE 2 DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS $110,914

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004938) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM,.... $27,729

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004937) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER $33,274

$171,917


885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF007938) BASEMENT AIR PLENUMS-REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS PIPE INSULATIONS & REINSULATE W/ NON-ASBESTOS. $203,000

464 - CHILLER (#DEF000628) REPLACE AIR-COOLED CHILLER $261,103


566 - ELEVATOR

(#DEF005318) REPLACE ELEVATOR 2 $266,592 268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS

(#DEF005130) REPLACE WATER HEATER IN EAST BASEMENT MR $66,349

$797,045

0128 - NISBET


$21,327

0196 - OBSERVATORY

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF008621) UPGRADE PLUMBING AND RESTROOMS $125,000

$125,000

0017 - OLD BOTANY

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF000649) REPLACE LIGHTING AND BRANCH CIRCUITS $178,165

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004599) REPLACE HOT AND COLD WATER PIPING THROUGHOUT BUILDING $55,457

$233,622

0025 - OLD HORTICULTURE

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF002698) REMOVE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FROM AIR PLENUM $243,036

$243,036

0047 - OLDS HALL

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF007897) BASEMENT CRAWL SPACE-REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS PIPE INSULATIONS & REINSULATE WITH NON-ASBESTOS INSULATIONS $25,375




(#DEF008970) REPLACE STEAM PIPING IS BASEMENT AND ADD SAFETY VALVE $150,000 460 - HVAC SYSTEMS OPERATIONS

(#DEF002657) INSTALL NEW HEATING/VENTILATING UNIT TO SERVE ENTIRE BUILDING, $7,291,075

$7,933,450


579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF003422) REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AND ADD SMOKE DETECTION $436,724

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF002355) REPLACE ALL PUBLIC RESTROOM FIXTURES: TOILETS, FLUSH VALVES, LAVATORIES AND LAV FAUCETS $66,601

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF002354) REPLACE WATER SOFTENERS IN MR B-2 $66,601

$569,926

0089 - OYER SPEECH AND HEARING


$159,955

0177 - PACKAGING

567 - FREON AIR CONDITIONING (#DEF000676) REPLACE 50 TON DX COOLING SYSTEM WITH CHILLER $500,000

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF001030) REPLACE AHU 4 AND 5 $873,449

$1,373,449


271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF005081) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, .... $33,175


$327,156



566 - ELEVATOR

(#DEF000761) REPLACE HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR $460,770

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF003664) HVAC EQUIPMENT $6,220,099

$6,680,869


579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF005282) REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AND SMOKE DETECTION $759,000



262 - PUMPS (#DEF009051) REPLACE FIRE PUMP AND CONTROLLER $40,000

$2,337,901

0098C - PLANT SCIENCE GREENHOUSE-EAST



$319,910


261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF004102) REPLACE ALL STEAM PIPING, FIN TUBE, VALVES, TRAPS AND CONDENSATE PIPING $1,522,500

$1,522,500

0027 - PSYCHOLOGY

464 - CHILLER (#DEF003643) CHILLER $168,949



(#DEF006238) REPLACE ORIGINAL TOILETS, FLUSH VALVES, URINALS, & URINAL FLUSH VALVES $46,634

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF006241) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER AND SHUT OFF VALVES $25,908

$241,491


262 - PUMPS (#DEF000788) REPLACE CONDENSATE PUMPS $36,000

467 - VAV SYSTEM

(#DEF000789) VAV SYSTEM $251,825

$287,825



$20,999

0217 - SPARTAN CHILD DEVELOPMENT

464 - CHILLER (#DEF006748) REPLACE AIR CONDITIONING $2,943,176

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT

(#DEF006750) REPLACE HVAC SYSTEM $103,632

$3,046,808


258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF000894) REPLACE HOT WATER DOMESTIC CONVERTOR. $61,436

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF000891) REPLACE 10 OBSOLETE MOTOR STARTERS, BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDERS. $36,862

$98,298


0440F - SWINE RESEARCH-AG POLLUTION CNTRL

274 - WASTE PIPING

(#DEF003608) WASTE PIPING $43,497

273 - WATER PIPING (#DEF003607) WATER PIPNG $29,998

$73,495

0479 - SWINE TEACH AND RESEARCH


(#DEF006894) REPLACE 21 GAS FIRED HEATERS. $50,750

$50,750


(#DEF003655) REPLACE ROOFS 9, 12, 13, 14, 17 $130,435

$130,435

0446E - VET RESEARCH-OFFICE

560 - HIGH VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS (#DEF002404) REPLACE OVERHEAD HIGH VOLTAGE LINE WITH UNDERGROUND $189,386

$189,386


566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF000954) COMPLETE ELEVATOR REPLACEMENT $243,036

(#DEF004667) REPLACE ROOF #2 $20,519

$263,555

CX0170 - VETERINARY MEDICAL CENTER COMPLEX

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF003458) REPLACE STEAM PRV SERVICE IN THE WEST PENTHOUSE OF "A" BUILDING. (BDLG 170) $59,162

$59,162


0078 - WELLS HALL

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL

(#DEF007563) C-WING REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS CEILING TILE $3,552,500

(#DEF007562) REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS $1,421,000

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF005152) REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 450 INDUCTION HEATING UNITS LOCATED IN THE OFFICES OF THE `A` AND `D` WINGS. $831,856

$5,805,356

0306 - YAKELEY GILCHRIST HALL


$50,750

Subtotal for FY 2016: $91,231,532




$440,000


263 - AIR COMPRESSORS

(#DEF004033) REPLACE CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR $32,609

$32,609

0132 - ANTHONY HALL


(#DEF003768) COOLING TOWERS $330,219


$952,919



(#DEF006456) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER HEATER $62,179

$62,179

0475B - CHEMICAL WASTE 2

274 - WASTE PIPING (#DEF003818) WASTE PIPING $80,995

$80,995


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF003453) REPLACE 17 AIR HANDLING UNITS AND ASSOCIATED FANS, PLUS 255 VAV BOXES $3,076,403

$3,076,403



$378,255

0009 - COWLES HOUSE

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004607) REPLACE 4 CHILLED WATER PUMPS $20,300

(#DEF004608) NEW FAN COIL UNITS AND VENTILATION DUCTWORK $177,463

(#DEF002387) REPLACE 16 FAN COIL UNITS $101,006

(#DEF002388) REPLACE 2 AIR HANDLING UNITS $37,877

568 - REFRIGERATION (#DEF002400) REPLACE WALK-IN COOLER AND WALK-IN FREEZER REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT AND DOORS. $40,600

$377,245


579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF000228) UPGRADE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AND ADD SMOKE DETECTION $395,963

$395,963


0081 - ENGINEERING

464 - CHILLER

(#DEF000255) REPLACE 2 MECHANICAL CHILLERS $350,000

562 - MOTORS, CONTROLS, & ELECTRICAL EQ. (#DEF000240) REPLACE MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS $53,757

$403,757


562 - MOTORS, CONTROLS, & ELECTRICAL EQ.

(#DEF000272) REPLACE ALL OLD POWER PANELS $321,003

$321,003

0091 - FARRALL HALL

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF000286) INSTALL NEW ELECTRICAL MAIN STEAM VALVE $23,039

$23,039

0186 - FOOD SAFETY TOXICOLOGY

467 - VAV SYSTEM (#DEF003791) VAV SYSTEM $3,136,298

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF005119) REPLACE DUPLEX WATER SOFTENER SYSTEM IN BASEMENT MR-21 $38,704

$3,175,002

0176 - GEOGRAPHY

562 - MOTORS, CONTROLS, & ELECTRICAL EQ. (#DEF000775) REPLACE OBSOLETE MOTOR STARTERS AND DISCONNECTS. $36,862

$36,862

0028 - GILTNER HALL

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004178) REPLACE AHU-1 AND ASSOCIATED EXHAUST FAN $145,575

$145,575



262 - PUMPS

(#DEF004195) REPLACE (4) HOT WATER HEATING PUMPS AND VALVES $75,699

$75,699



$393,490


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004096) REPLACE EXHAUST FANS IN ARENA, TENNIS COURTS, AND UPPER WEST GYM. $207,263

$207,263


277 - UNIT HEATERS - NATURAL GAS OR HOT WATER

(#DEF000446) REPLACE HEATING AND VENTILATING UNITS $532,454

$532,454

0029 - KEDZIE HALL

579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF005273) REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AND SMOKE DETECTOR $629,157

$629,157

0150 - KRESGE ART




$961,773


0183 - LIFE SCIENCE

579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS

(#DEF005278) REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM $718,732

$718,732

0011 - MUSIC

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF003967) REPLACE RF-1, EF-2, EF-3, EF-6, RF-8, RF-11, RF-12, RF-9, SF-1, SF-10, SF-15, SF-16, SF-3, AND SF-5 $1,281,058

$1,281,058

0047 - OLDS HALL

567 - FREON AIR CONDITIONING (#DEF004530) REPLACE ROOF TOP AIR CONDITIONING UNIT #1 $58,230


$208,220


566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF006842) REPLACE DUMBWAITER #3 $51,816

$51,816

0177 - PACKAGING


$953,939



(#DEF003472) REPLACE 5 SUPPLY FANS, 4 PLENUM EXHAUST FANS....., $2,958,080

$2,958,080


0449 - SHEEP BARN

(#DEF003809) ROOF #1 AND 2 $76,557 $76,557


262 - PUMPS

(#DEF005207) REPLACE 4 HOT WATER HEAT PUMPS AND VALVES $66,349

$66,349


122 - BOILERS, COMBUSTION EQUIP., FANS & CHIMNEYS(#DEF004773) RETUBE NO. 1 CONDENSER $277,285

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF006765) REPLACE STEAM HEATING IN TRANSFER TOWER OF COAL HANDLING SYSTEM $51,816

$329,101

0211 - UNIV RESEARCH CONTAINMENT

272 - HEAT EXCHANGERS(#DEF003800) HEAT EXCHANGERS $899,942

$899,942

0008 - WILLS HOUSE


$44,997

Subtotal for FY 2017: $20,290,432




461 - HVAC CONTROLS


$430,450


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004276) HVAC EQUIPMENT - AHU $970,437


$1,170,437

0132 - ANTHONY HALL

275 - SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (#DEF004613) REPLACE ENTIRE FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION SYSTEM $2,551,025

$2,551,025

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF003978) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM - LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, TOILET SEATS AND $34,938

$34,938

467 - VAV SYSTEM (#DEF002170) VAV SYSTEMS $119,433

$119,433

0069 - BRESLIN

461 - HVAC CONTROLS (#DEF004901) UPGRADE 2 EXISTING DDC PANELS (MBC 11 AND 12) IN BERKOWITZ TO NEWER TECHNOLOGY $23,292

262 - PUMPS (#DEF004899) REPLACE CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR IN MECH ROOM 10 $22,183

$45,475



566 - ELEVATOR


$266,592




$403,474


464 - CHILLER (#DEF003761) CHILLER REPLACEMENT $3,654,000

$3,654,000


463 - COOLING TOWERS (#DEF004366) COOLING TOWERS - DC1 $97,494

(#DEF004368) COOLING TOWERS - DC3 $97,494

(#DEF004367) COOLING TOWERS - DC2 $97,494

$292,481

0328 - CONRAD HALL

464 - CHILLER (#DEF004427) CHILLER - CH1 $224,986

$224,986

0009 - COWLES HOUSE


568 - REFRIGERATION (#DEF007134) REPLACE 2 REACH-IN COOLERS, ONE REACH-IN FREEZER & UNDERCOUNTER COOLER. $20,300

$110,941




(#DEF001064) REPLACE MAIN LIGHTING AND POWER DISTRIBUTION PANELS $53,757

$53,757

0081 - ENGINEERING

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004385) HVAC EQUIPMENT - AHU $4,135,233

262 - PUMPS (#DEF004192) REPLACE DUPLEX 5HP CONTROL AIR COMPRESSORS ON 120 GALLON TANK AND AIR DRYER $27,950

$4,163,184

0015 - EUSTACE-COLE HALL

262 - PUMPS (#DEF004352) PUMPS $119,992


$371,976

0179 - FOOD SCIENCE


(#DEF000318) REPLACE LAB FIXTURE PLUMBING TRIM AND TRAPS $537,565

$537,565

0028 - GILTNER HALL

263 - AIR COMPRESSORS (#DEF010801) REPLACE 2 CONTROL AIR COMPRESSORS WITH LARGER ONES $48,000


562 - MOTORS, CONTROLS, & ELECTRICAL EQ. (#DEF000325) REPLACE FUSE PANELS $177,485

$532,665



566 - ELEVATOR

(#DEF000365) COMPLETE REPLACEMENT OF SPECIAL ELEVATOR $307,180

$307,180

0456N - HORSE RESEARCH-ARENA

(#DEF004313) ROOFING - SH, ROOFS #1 AND 2 $136,463

$136,463



$98,450


563 - LIGHTING FIXTURES (#DEF002577) REPLACE GASKETS/SEALS ON LIGHTS, UPGRADE TO HID FIXTURES $88,380

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF005572) REPLACE WATER SOFTENER MINERAL IN BUILDING WATER SOFTENERS $42,655

$131,035





262 - PUMPS (#DEF004030) REPLACE CHILLED WATER PUMPS $60,559

(#DEF004029) REPLACE HW HEAT PUMPS $60,559

$2,062,618


0209 - INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FAC-STRG 1

(#DEF004323) ROOFING - FM ROOF #1 $77,979 $77,979


262 - PUMPS

(#DEF004736) REPLACE CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR AND AIR DRYER $44,366

$44,366

0150 - KRESGE ART

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL(#DEF000483) ABATE PLASTER/SPRAY-ON FIREPROOFING $537,565

$537,565

0154 - MANLY MILES


262 - PUMPS(#DEF004405) PUMPS $146,991

$206,987

0083 - MSU COLLEGE OF LAW

275 - SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (#DEF004023) FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SYSTEM $29,115


$1,866,497

0011 - MUSIC

563 - LIGHTING FIXTURES (#DEF000572) REPLACE HALLWAY LIGHTING AND WIRING ON THE 1ST AND 2ND FLOORS (MR5) $29,182

$29,182

0025 - OLD HORTICULTURE

464 - CHILLER


(#DEF003734) CHILLER $168,949 $168,949



(#DEF006843) REPLACE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES $207,263

$207,263

0089 - OYER SPEECH AND HEARING

272 - HEAT EXCHANGERS (#DEF004391) HEAT EXCHANGERS $74,995

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF005204) REPLACE ORIGINAL STEAM REDUCING STATION $42,655

$117,650

0177 - PACKAGING

262 - PUMPS (#DEF003546) RESIZE AND REPLACE CONTROL AIR COMPRESSORS IN THE BASEMENT MECHANICAL ROOM $28,398

$28,398


563 - LIGHTING FIXTURES (#DEF003665) LIGHTING FIXTURES $1,979,872

$1,979,872

0214 - RADIOLOGY

262 - PUMPS(#DEF004301) PUMPS $230,985

467 - VAV SYSTEM(#DEF004302) VAV SYSTEM $472,470

$703,455



464 - CHILLER

(#DEF003599) REPLACE CHILLER #10 AND COOLING TOWER $2,021,102 $2,021,102


464 - CHILLER

(#DEF003676) REPLACE CHILLER 3 ON ROOF $383,975


$1,238,920

0440J - SWINE RESEARCH-PORTER

(#DEF004340) ROOFING - MT ROOF #1 $38,990

$38,990


566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF004285) ELEVATOR - 2 $599,961

$599,961



(#DEF002180) CHILLER $319,910

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004147) REPLACE AHU 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, EXHAUST FANS 1, 2, 7, AND 8. $1,281,058

$1,920,879

0082 - URBAN PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCH-IMC

262 - PUMPS (#DEF003542) REPLACE HOT WATER HEAT PUMPS 1 AND 2, INCLUDING CHECK, BALANCING AND ISOLATION VALVES $35,497

$35,497




(#DEF000948) REPLACE STEAM PRV STATION, RECONFIGURE PIPING MR-A50 $46,445

$46,445

0458B - WATER QUALITY MGMT-PUMP HSE

274 - WASTE PIPING (#DEF004329) WASTE PIPING $35,998

$35,998

Subtotal for FY 2018: $29,605,078

2019




$430,450


262 - PUMPS (#DEF004035) REPLACE HOT WATER HEAT PUMPS $62,888

(#DEF004034) REPLACE CHILLED WATER PUMPS $60,559

$123,447

463 - COOLING TOWERS (#DEF002150) REPLACE 200 TON CHILLER AND COOLING TOWERS $1,663,712

$1,663,712

0168 - BIOCHEMISTRY

463 - COOLING TOWERS (#DEF004413) COOLING TOWERS - CT3 $2,774,821

$2,774,821

0069 - BRESLIN


464 - CHILLER (#DEF000083) REPLACE 800 TON CHILLER (RM 10) AND COOLING TOWER

566 - ELEVATOR



579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF004373) SECURITY & EMERGENCY SYSTEMS/TIME CLOCKS - FIRE ALARM $394,475

563 - LIGHTING FIXTURES (#DEF004374) LIGHTING FIXTURES $3,299,787

$6,277,219


566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF004297) ELEVATOR - 2 $599,961

(#DEF004298) TRACTION ELEVATOR - 1 $599,961

$1,199,923


271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004621) REPLACE ALL TOILET FLUSH VALVES, LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, KITCHEN SINK FAUCETS. $24,401

(#DEF003798) REPLACE ROOFING #1, 2, 3, 4 $100,000

$124,401


262 - PUMPS (#DEF004566) REPLACEMENT OF CHILLED WATER PUMPS $93,168

$93,168


262 - PUMPS (#DEF003716) PUMPS $88,494

$88,494


0164 - CYCLOTRON

262 - PUMPS

(#DEF004258) PUMPS $25,498

$25,498

0081 - ENGINEERING





262 - PUMPS (#DEF004194) REPLACE DUPLEX CONTROL AIR COMPRESSORS, AIR DRYER AND AIR BOARD LOCATED IN PENTHOUSE RM #500 $27,950

$4,112,905

0015 - EUSTACE-COLE HALL


$179,988

0091 - FARRALL HALL

262 - PUMPS (#DEF004394) PUMPS $29,998

$29,998

0091A - FARRALL-PROTOTYPE ASSEMBLY

262 - PUMPS (#DEF004453) PUMPS $44,997


$125,992



464 - CHILLER


(#DEF003570) REPLACE CHILLER $155,447

(#DEF000362) REPLACE CHILLER $291,150

463 - COOLING TOWERS (#DEF003569) REPLACE COOLING TOWER $307,180

$753,777

0210 - INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FAC-STRG 2

(#DEF004316) ROOFING - FM ROOF #1 $97,473

$97,473


(#DEF004912) REPLACE STEAM PRV SYSTEM IN MAIN MECHANICAL ROOM $133,097

561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF004925) REPLACE ELECTRICAL BRANCH CIRCUIT PANELS, PANEL FEEDERS, AND BRANCH CIRCUITS $1,663,712

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004730) REMOVE AND REPLACE ORIGINAL EXPOSED DOMESTIC HOT AND COLD WATER PIPING IN BASEMENT. $166,371

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF004724) REPLACE WATER SOFTENER MINERAL IN TWO WATER SOFTENER TANKS LOCATED IN THE BASEMENT MECH ROOM. $33,274

$1,996,454

0049 - LIBRARY

262 - PUMPS (#DEF004369) PUMPS $44,997

$44,997

0183 - LIFE SCIENCE

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL (#DEF000498) ABATE SPRAY-ON FIREPROOFING ABOVE CEILINGS IN ENTIRE BUILDING $6,143,604

$6,143,604


0154 - MANLY MILES

885 - ASBESTOS REPAIR & REMOVAL

(#DEF004068) REMOVE ALL ASBESTOS CONTAMINATED CEILING PLASTER AND SPRAY ON FIRE RETARDANT ABOVE IN BLDG $582,299

$582,299



262 - PUMPS (#DEF004355) PUMPS $98,994


$949,439

0223 - MSU SURPLUS AND RECYCLING


$45,675

0013 - MUSEUM

279 - CAST IRON RADIATORS (#DEF000567) REPLACE CAST IRON RADIATORS AND CONTROL VALVES $307,180

$307,180

0011 - MUSIC


$266,592

0128 - NISBET


(#DEF004271) CHILLER - CH2 $247,484

$494,968

0155 - PARKING RAMP 4-KELLOGG



(#DEF004409) PARKING RAMP NO. 4 - LIGHTING FIXTURES UPGRADE TO LED $500,000

(#DEF004407) ROOFING - FC ROOFS 1, A, B, C D, E AND F $77,979

$577,979


463 - COOLING TOWERS (#DEF000811) REPLACE CHILLER #9 AND COOLING TOWER

$1,996,454


262 - PUMPS(#DEF007860) REPLACE CHILLED WATER PUMP N-4 $34,510

(#DEF007859) REPLACE CHILLED WATER PUMP N-3 $34,510

$69,020

0440A - SWINE RESEARCH - BARN/ELEVATOR STGE

(#DEF004436) ROOFING - MT ROOFS #1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5 $97,473

$97,473


(#DEF000866) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT ROOF #2 $67,580

(#DEF000868) ROOF REPAIR/REPLACEMENT ROOF #17,16 $66,044

123 - STEAM TURBINES, GENER. & RELATED EQ. (#DEF006657) CAMPUS STEAM TRAP REPLACEMENT PROGRAM $518,158

$651,781



$224,986



467 - VAV SYSTEM

(#DEF004299) VAV SYSTEM $41,997

$41,997


262 - PUMPS (#DEF005159) REPLACE CONTROL AIR COMPRESSORS (3 SETS) $82,937

$82,937

0170A - VETERINARY MEDICAL CENTER-EQUINE



$637,463

0078 - WELLS HALL

463 - COOLING TOWERS (#DEF004378) COOLING TOWERS - CT2 $254,984

(#DEF004377) COOLING TOWERS - CT1 $254,984

$509,967

0008 - WILLS HOUSE

(#DEF004308) ROOFING - FC 1 AND 2 $38,990

$38,990

Subtotal for FY 2019: $33,861,523




461 - HVAC CONTROLS


$430,450


464 - CHILLER (#DEF000934) REPLACE MECHANICAL CHILLER $291,150


$497,283

0132 - ANTHONY HALL


(#DEF003770) COOLING TOWERS $261,103

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004039) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM FAUCETS AND TRIM, URINAL FLUSH VALVES AND TOILET FLUSH VALVES $37,267

$597,871

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004013) REPLACE DOMESTIC COLD WATER SHUT OFF VALVES AND WATER METER WHERE WATER ENTERS BUILDING $23,292

$23,292

263 - AIR COMPRESSORS (#DEF010794) REPLACE DUPLEX CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR $28,000

$28,000

263 - AIR COMPRESSORS (#DEF010812) REPLACE DUPLEX CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR $30,000

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF003950) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, TOILET FLUSH VALVES, $93,168

$123,168


0069 - BRESLIN


(#DEF004590) REPLACE (110) PUBLIC RESTROOM FAUCETS AND (110) TOILET SEATS $103,150

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004589) INSTALL 8 INCH SHUTOFF VALVE AND BLOW DOWN TO COLD WATER PIPING WHERE IT ENTERS THE BUILDING $27,729

262 - PUMPS (#DEF004900) REPLACE AIR PUMPS AMD ELECTRICAL CONTROLS ON SEWAGE EJECTION SYSTEM $83,186

$214,064



258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF005167) REPLACE SECOND OF TWO DOMESTIC STEAM WATER HEATERS IN MR-N1 $55,291

(#DEF005166) REPLACE DOMESTIC STEAM WATER HEATER IN MR-N1 $55,291

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF005170) REPLACE URINALS IN MENS PUBLIC RESTROOMS $27,646

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF005169) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER AND ISOLATION VALVES IN MR-N1 $27,646

262 - PUMPS (#DEF002117) REPLACE CHILLED WATER PUMPS $67,360

$402,183


279 - CAST IRON RADIATORS (#DEF000107) REPLACE CAST IRON RADIATORS WITH CONVECTORS $184,308

567 - FREON AIR CONDITIONING (#DEF000095) REPLACE ROOF TOP AIR CONDITIONING UNIT FOR ROOMS 115 AND 116 $47,329

$231,637


0163 - CHEMISTRY


(#DEF001077) INSTALL NEW LIGHTING PANELS (12) $69,876

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004649) REPLACE TOILET FLUSH VAVLES, LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, AND TOILET SEATS. $33,274

$103,150



(#DEF003895) REPLACE STEAM SERVICE TO INSIDE OF BUILDING $145,575

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004601) REPLACE URINAL FLUSH VALAVES, TOILET FLUSH VALVES, AND TOILET SEATS IN PUBLIC RESTROOMS $27,729

$173,303


562 - MOTORS, CONTROLS, & ELECTRICAL EQ. (#DEF001078) INSTALL NEW DISTRIBUTION PANELS (6) $163,044

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004635) REPLACE TOILET FLUSH VALVES, URINAL FLUSH VALVES, VAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, AND TOILET SEATS $77,640

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004634) REPLACE DOMESTIC COLD WATER METER AND ASSOCIATED SHUT OFF VALVES. $27,729

262 - PUMPS (#DEF002257) REPLACE ONE CONDENSER PUMP $71,862

(#DEF000155) ROOF REPLACEMENT/RESTORATION ROOFS #1 THROUGH 15 $2,044,795

$2,385,069

0084A - COMMUNICATION ARTS - MITN STORAGE


467 - VAV SYSTEM

(#DEF000152) VAV SYSTEM $81,522

$107,020



263 - AIR COMPRESSORS

(#DEF010804) REPLACE CONTROL AIR COMPRESSOR $35,000

572 - SUBSTATIONS/TRANSFORMERS (#DEF004365) SUBSTATIONS/TRANSFORMERS - 13.2 KV $629,959

$664,959

0328 - CONRAD HALL


(#DEF004639) REPLACE DOMESTIC COLD WATER SHUTOFF VALVES AND WATER METER WHERE WATER COMES INTO THE BUILDING. $27,729

$27,729

0009 - COWLES HOUSE

567 - FREON AIR CONDITIONING (#DEF007135) REPLACE 3-SEASONS ROOM AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM $20,300

462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF004609) REPLACE KITCHEN HVAC EQUIPMENT, FIRE ALARM SYSTEM AND MAIN HVAC EQUIPMENT. $277,285

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF002396) REPLACE BATHROOM SINKS, FAUCETS AND TOILETS. REPLACE KITCHEN FAUCETS. $31,564

$329,150




$491,578

0164 - CYCLOTRON


(#DEF004259) REPLACE / COAT ROOFS #23, 24 $97,473


(#DEF003782) REPLACE ROOFS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12 $650,739

$3,148,826

0215 - DCPAH-DIAG CNTR POP ANIM HEALTH


(#DEF005138) REPLACE STEAM DOMESTIC WATER HEATER LOCATED IN PENTHOUSE $55,291

270 - WATER SOFTENERS (#DEF005140) REPLACE WATER SOFTENER MINERAL IN 2 DOMESTIC WATER SOFTENER TANKS IN MR-032 $38,704

$93,995

0081 - ENGINEERING

258 - DOMESTIC HOT WATER HEATERS (#DEF005000) REPLACE STEAM WATER HEATER IN MR-B510 $55,457


261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF004741) REPLACE CHILLED WATER COILS IN HVAC FANS $221,165


(#DEF005001) REPLACE LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, URINAL AND TOILET FLUSH VALVES AND TOILET SEATS $27,729

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS(#DEF004999) REPLACE WATER METER AND SHUT OFF VALVES IN MR-B510. $27,729


$1,815,995


579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF005291) UPDATE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM $865,891

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF006891) REPLACE (2) SMALLER CONDENSATE RETURN UNIT AND ONE LARGER CRU IN MECH ROOM 1, 7, & 13 $142,100

262 - PUMPS (#DEF010814) REPLACE 3 BASE MT. B&G 1510 PUMPS ON HWH SYSTEM. VALVES & ELECTRICAL DIS. ALSO, 2 DIF SYSTEMS $45,000

$1,052,991


0186 - FOOD SAFETY TOXICOLOGY



(#DEF001944) REPLACE PUBLIC RESTROOM FIXTURES $27,646

$80,964

0179 - FOOD SCIENCE


(#DEF005186) REPLACE FLUSH VALVES, TOILET SEATS, LAV FAUCETS ANDS TRIM $22,116

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF005185) REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER METER AND ISOLATION VALVES $27,646

$49,762

0171 - FOOD STORES


$250,000

0176 - GEOGRAPHY


(#DEF004071) REPLACE MAIN DOMESTIC COLD WATER SHUT OFF VALVES AND WATER METER, $25,621

$25,621

0456O - HORSE RESEARCH-BARN

(#DEF004311) ROOFING - SH, ROOF #1 $38,990

$38,990


271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF005571) REPLACE COLUMN AND WALL SHOWERS IN THE MEN'S & WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOMS $85,309

(#DEF005569) REPLACE TOILETS, LAVATORIES & URINALS IN RESTROOMS $63,982

$149,292




(#DEF005612) REPLACE COLUMN SHOWERS AND WALL SHOWERS VALVES IN LOCKER ROOMS $106,637

(#DEF005611) REPLACE 40 TOILETS, 40 LAVATORIES, AND 25 URINALS IN RESTROOMS $79,978

$186,614


262 - PUMPS (#DEF010807) REPLACE TWO 4" GORMON RUPP BASE MTD SUMP PUMPS $40,000

$40,000

0029 - KEDZIE HALL

262 - PUMPS (#DEF010839) REPLACE 4 HWH PUMPS #3,4,5,6 (BASE MTD., B&G 1510'S) $60,000

$60,000

0158 - LANDSCAPE SERVICES


$32,998

0049 - LIBRARY


$97,040

0014 - LINTON HALL


268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004632) REPLACE ALL WATER PIPING IN BUILDING. $887,313

$1,050,357

0154 - MANLY MILES


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF006670) REPLACE FAN COIL UNITS $2,639,000

(#DEF004402) HVAC EQUIPMENT - AHU $29,998

$2,668,998



(#DEF004627) REPLACE TOILET FLUSH VALVES, URINAL FLUSH VALVES, LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, AND TOILET SEATS $22,183

$22,183

0227 - MSU FOUNDATION


$253,750


262 - PUMPS (#DEF010799) REPLACE 4 BASE MT. SUMP PUMPS IN AIR PLENUMS E & W

0128 - NISBET


$74,995

0047 - OLDS HALL

268 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS - BUILDINGS (#DEF004831) REPLACE ALL DOMESTIC HOT AND COLD WATER PIPING INSIDE THE BUILDING, $1,109,141

$1,109,141


261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF002360) REPLACE STEAM VALVES ON RADIATIORS IN ALL ROOMS $53,281

$53,281



464 - CHILLER

(#DEF003712) CHILLER $215,026


$934,980



(#DEF005269) MOVE AND RE-PIPE HWHT BOOSTER COILS THAT ARE LOCATED IN THE HERBARIUM. $63,982

$63,982

0098C - PLANT SCIENCE GREENHOUSE-EAST


$74,995


462 - HVAC EQUIPMENT (#DEF000742) REPLACE 160 SIDEWALL EXHAUST FANS $582,299

$582,299

0600A - RADIO FACILITY - RADIO TRANSM WKAR

(#DEF000797) ROOFS #1, 2 AND 3. REPLACEMENT. $68,129

$68,129


579 - FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS (#DEF000882) UPDATE FIRE SYSTEM AND ADD SMOKE DETECTORS $512,423

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF004655) REPLACE ALL PUBLIC RESTROOM LAVATORY FAUCETS AND TRIM, AND TOILET FLUSH VALVES AND TOILET SEATS. $33,274


(#DEF004654) REPLACE EXISTING SHUT OFF VALVES AND WATER METER.... $27,729


262 - PUMPS (#DEF007857) REPLACE SUMP PUMP 03 $20,300

(#DEF007858) REPLACE SUMP PUMP 04 $20,300

$614,026



(#DEF004140) REPLACE HEAT EXCHANGERS $29,115

(#DEF004139) REPLACE HOT WATER HEATING PUMPS $69,876

262 - PUMPS (#DEF003602) REPLACE SUMP PUMPS $51,816

(#DEF004149) REPLACE ENERGY RECLAIM PUMPS (2) $87,345

(#DEF004318) ROOFING - FM ROOFS #1, 2, 3, AND 4 $253,432

467 - VAV SYSTEM(#DEF003603) VAV SYSTEM $421,473

(#DEF002171) VAV SYSTEM $732,595

$1,645,651



$222,808


561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF000967) BARN "B" - REWIRE $36,862

(#DEF000965) BARN "A" - REWIRE BUILDING $27,646

$64,508

0446J - VET RESEARCH-SMALL ANIMAL

261 - HEATING SYSTEM - BUILDING (#DEF004163) REPLACE GAS FIRE DOMESTIC WATER HEATER $29,115


(#DEF004164) REPLACE LOW PRESSURE STEAM BOILER AND BOILER FEED SYSTEM $232,920

$262,035


566 - ELEVATOR (#DEF003591) REPLACE ELEVATOR D2 $295,808

(#DEF003590) REPLACE ELEVATOR G4 $295,808

(#DEF003589) REPLACE ELEVATOR G3 $295,808

$887,424

0170A - VETERINARY MEDICAL CENTER-EQUINE

262 - PUMPS

(#DEF004306) PUMPS $122,992

$122,992

0078 - WELLS HALL

271 - PLUMBING FIXTURES (#DEF003574) PLUMBING FIXTURES $92,994

$92,994

0008 - WILLS HOUSE

279 - CAST IRON RADIATORS (#DEF001001) REPLACE CAST IRON RADIATORS WITH CONVECTORS AND SELF CONTAINED VALVES. $36,862

$36,862

Subtotal for FY 2020: $24,909,382



$40,000


0132 - ANTHONY HALL

262 - PUMPS

(#DEF003764) PUMPS $1,238,920

(#DEF003773) PUMPS $241,484

$1,480,405

0081 - ENGINEERING

262 - PUMPS

(#DEF003660) PUMPS $137,991

$137,991



$326,088

0183 - LIFE SCIENCE


$53,318


467 - VAV SYSTEM (#DEF000014) VAV SYSTEM REPAIRS $150,518

$150,518

0196 - OBSERVATORY

(#DEF001029) ROOFING $105,978

$105,978


262 - PUMPS (#DEF003714) PUMPS $227,985

$227,985



262 - PUMPS

(#DEF002115) REPLACE CHILLED WATER PUMPS $309,247 $309,247

0319 - VAN HOOSEN HALL


(#DEF011113) REPLACE BOILER $100,000

$100,000



$751,166


Subtotal for Building Systems: $203,580,643

Appendix F: Utility System Distribution Needs

Thu Jul 02 07:39:42 EDT 2015 Page 1 of 8 be06bb8e-2f72-4d6f-9738-7cf5c49cc294

JIT NEEDS FOR UTILITIES - FISCAL YEARS 2015/16 to 2020/21


About This Report The dollar values displayed in this report are in inflated building cost index format. This means that the project estimates are inflated

using Engineering News Records's Building Cost Index (annual averages) to what they are projected to be at the current time. Because the index is not available until January of the following year, the current year value of the index is determined from a linear regression of the last ten years of the index.

The following criteria were used in selecting data for this report: Only records with a scheduled year that is greater than or equal to 2016 and less than or equal to 2021 are included. Un-funded items for fiscal years prior to 2016 will be rolled up into the entries for fiscal year 2016. Only records with a funding responsibility identified in the following list will be included:

General Fund Maintenance & Repair

Only records that have a dollar amount that is greater than or equal to $20,000 are included. Only non-transitional infrastructure is included. Only unfunded projects are included. Only the following infrastructure project types are included:

UTILITIES All infrastructure objects types are included. All object classes are included.


Utilities

20169576 - COMMUNICATION DISTRIBUTION

565 - COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS(#DEF003060) COMMUNICATION DUCTLINE - NEW DUCTLINE FROM SHAW LANE TO MCDONEL HALL $236,646

$236,646

9573 - ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

573 - CABLE, WIRING

(#DEF005225) ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION - DAIRY RESEARCH COMPLEX - REPLACE OVERHEAD POLE LINE WITH UNDERGROUND ELECT $1,919,463

$1,919,463

9572 - SEWER DISTRIBUTION

269 - SEWERS - STORM & SANITARY (#DEF008898) SEWER DIST SYSTEM - STORM/SANITARY CROSS CONNECTION STUDY $150,000

(#DEF008897) SEWER DIST SYSTEM - SEPARATE STORM AND SANITARY SEWER UNDER RAILROAD AT LOT 83 (STO#2320) $400,000

(#DEF009034) CLEAN AND VIDEO TAPE CAMPUS SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS $150,000

$700,000

9570 - STEAM DISTRIBUTION

260 - STEAM TUNNEL SYSTEM (#DEF005227) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO CAMPUS STEAM TUNNEL PIPE SUPPORTS AND ANCHORS $1,066,368

(#DEF009031) STEAM DISTRBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATED CONDENSATE RETURN ANCHOR AND PIPING IN VAULT258 $475,000

(#DEF005228) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - MISC MAJOR REPAIRS TO CAMPUS STEAM TUNNEL PIPE SUPPORTS AND ANCHORS $1,066,368

(#DEF002498) SOUTH CAMPUS - EAST LOOP $5,300,000

(#DEF009029) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE ADSCO EXPANSION JOINTS FROM POWERPLANT TO VAULT 180, PHASE 1 OF 3 $585,000

$8,492,736

9574 - STREET LIGHT DISTRIBUTION

569 - LIGHTS - STREET & WALK (#DEF009038) REPLACE UNDERGROUND STREET LIGHT CABLE $150,000

$150,000

Subtotal for FY 2016: $11,498,845


2017


269 - SEWERS - STORM & SANITARY (#DEF009040) CLEAN AND VIDEO TAPE CAMPUS SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS $150,000

$150,000


260 - STEAM TUNNEL SYSTEM (#DEF002495) ADDITIONAL STEAM MAIN AND UPGRADE TO EXISTING MAINS AT RIVER CROSSING (PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE) $1,500,000

(#DEF002500) INCREASE STEAM LINE SIZE FROM A 12" TO A 20" ALONG BOGUE ST. FROM WILSON RD. TO RED CEDAR RIVER BRID $3,732,288

(#DEF009036) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE ADSCO/BELLOW EXPANSION JOINTS FROM POWERPLANT TO VAULT 180, PHASE 2 $600,000

(#DEF002492) INSTALL SECOND 20" STEAM AND 10" CR LINE FROM WELLS HALL BRIDGE TO NCS $3,900,000

(#DEF005458) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - MISC MAJOR REPAIRS $1,066,368

$10,798,657


569 - LIGHTS - STREET & WALK (#DEF002703) REPLACE UNDERGROUND STREET LIGHT CABLE - PHASE 5 OF 12 PHASES $165,874

$165,874

9571 - WATER DISTRIBUTION

267 - WATER MAINS (#DEF005456) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATED CAST IRON DISTRIBUTION MAINS $1,599,552

(#DEF005454) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPALCE FIRE HYDRANTS AND LEADS $266,592

$1,866,144

Subtotal for FY 2017: $12,980,674


573 - CABLE, WIRING (#DEF005553) ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION - CABLE/MISC REPLACEMENT AND REPAIRS $2,132,736

$2,132,736




$150,000


260 - STEAM TUNNEL SYSTEM

(#DEF009044) STEAM - REPLACE STEAM AND CONDENSATE RETURN FROM VAULT 1 TO VAULT 4, INCREASE CAPACITY $2,450,000

(#DEF009039) STEAM DISTRIBUTION INSTALL SECOND 18" CR LINE FROM PWR PLT TO VLT 206 $1,925,000

(#DEF009043) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - MISC. MAJOR REPAIRS $1,500,000

$5,875,000



(#DEF002704) REPLACE UNDERGROUND STREET LIGHT CABLE $165,874

$315,874


267 - WATER MAINS (#DEF002516) REPLACE 8" MAIN ON WESTBOUND SHAW LANE NEAR INTERNATIONAL CENTER BUILDING (LOCATION B4, 820 LINEAR F $354,970

(#DEF002519) COMPLETE EASTERN LOOP FROM RESEARCH COMPLEX - ENGINEERING TO SERVICE ROAD (LOCATION B8, 2,390 LINEAR $1,200,000

(#DEF005469) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATING CAST IRON WATER MAINS $1,599,552

$3,154,522

Subtotal for FY 2018: $11,628,132



561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF002677) REPLACE CONTACTORS, CONTROL SYSTEMS, WIRE AND LIGHT FIXTURES IN STEAM TUNNELS AND VAULTS $121,518

$303,795




$150,000



(#DEF005478) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - MISC. MAJOR REPAIRS $1,500,000

(#DEF009047) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - INSTALL SECOND 20" HPSTM / 10"PCR FROM V267 TO V193 $5,800,000

$7,300,000


267 - WATER MAINS (#DEF005477) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATING CAST IRON DISTRIBUTION MAINS $1,599,552

(#DEF005468) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATING CAST IRON DISTRIBUTION MAIN $533,184

$2,132,736


2020



561 - LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS (#DEF002678) REPLACE CONTACTORS, CONTROL SYSTEMS, WIRE AND LIGHT FIXTURES IN STEAM TUNNELS AND VAULTS $121,518

$2,254,254


269 - SEWERS - STORM & SANITARY (#DEF006890) SEWERS - CLEAN AND VIDEO TAPE CAMPUS SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS $152,250

(#DEF002685) CLEAN AND VIDEO TAPE CAMPUS SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS $182,277

$334,527



785 - ROADS & BRIDGES

(#DEF009049) DESIGN - PARTIAL FEE FOR FY2020-2021 $750,000 260 - STEAM TUNNEL SYSTEM


$2,250,000



$182,277


267 - WATER MAINS (#DEF005481) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATING CAST IRON DISTRIBUTION MAINS $2,132,736

$2,132,736


2021

9576 - COMMUNICATION DISTRIBUTION

565 - COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

(#DEF003057) COMMUNICATION DUCTLINE - NEW DUCTLINE FROM UNION TO HUMAN ECOLOGY $118,323

$118,323



$2,132,736



$150,000




(#DEF002501) INSTALL A SECOND 24" STEAM AND 12" CR ALONG SERVICE ROAD FROM STM0206 (PWR PLNT) TO BOGUE AND SERVIC $5,717,080

(#DEF005515) STEAM DISTRIBUTION - INSTALL SECONDARY STEAM SERVICE TO NORTH CAMPUS, BOGUE STREET RIVER CROSSING. $8,370,990


$16,220,806



$182,277


267 - WATER MAINS (#DEF005442) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATING CAST IRON DISTRIBUTION MAIN AND UPSIZE FOR FLOW CAPACITY $719,798

(#DEF005491) WATER DISTRIBUTION - REPLACE DETERIORATING CAST IRON DISTRIBUTION MAINS $2,665,920

$3,385,719

Subtotal for FY 2021: $22,189,861

Subtotal for Utilities: $75,337,838

Appendix G: SFY2017 Capital Outlay Request

of 7

ATTACHMENT B

FISCAL YEAR 2017 CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT REQUEST

Institution Name: Michigan State University

Project Title: STEM Teaching and Learning Facility

Project Focus: ☒ Academic □ Research □ Administrative/Support Typeof Project: □ Renovation □ Addition ☒ New Construction

Program Focus of Occupants: Undergraduate student teaching and learning focused on science, technology, engineering and mathematics

Approximate Square Footage: Approximately 120,000 gross square feet

TotalEstimated Cost: $70.0 million

Estimated Start/Completion Dates: Start: Summer 2017 (upon authorization) Completion: Summer 2019 (Fall Semester 2019 occupancy)

IstheFive-YearPlanposted onthe institution's public internet site? ☒Yes ☐No Istherequestedproject thetoppriority intheFive-Year CapitalOutlayPlan? ☒Yes ☐No Istherequestedproject focusedonasingle, stand-a/one facility? ☒Yes ☐No

Describe the Project Purpose

Over the past ten years Michigan State University has experienced an increase in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) and STEM-related course activities that include a 40 percent increase in overall credit hours, a 27 percent increase in lab course enrollments, a 13 percent increase in the number of courses, and a 24 percent increase in the number of sections. The STEM Teaching and Learning Facility will support the increased demand for STEM education and bring together currently dispersed and outdated teaching laboratories and related instructional and support spaces. The bringing together of dispersed STEM teaching spaces will create a hub for STEM education. The new facility will support the changing curriculums and teaching methods associated with STEM. It will leverage interdisciplinary teaching and learning with goals to improve recruitment, retention and student success. Further, we are intent on graduating individuals that leave Michigan State University prepared to contribute to society in focused and broad ways, with the skills and experiences that support life-long learning and contributions, including economic development in the state and beyond.

While the university has continued to invest in upgrades to instructional space within existing facilities, it has become increasingly difficult to support enrollment growth in STEM disciplines and maintain a quality learning experience for the student. Instructional pedagogy has changed from one that was largely instructor-focused to one that is student-centered. Current instructional laboratory configurations and infrastructure make it challenging for instructors and students alike to be collaborative, innovative, and successful in the classroom. The current disbursement of STEM related instructional laboratories makes it difficult to increase productivity of the space and the essential need for more cross-disciplinary teaching and learning. As we look forward, instructional models have evolved with emphasis on bringing the traditional

of 7

lecture and lab together to improve student learning. Construction of a new instructional facility focused on supporting teaching and learning in STEM disciplines is necessary to continue this programmatic direction. Such a facility would address the continued national and State of Michigan priority to educate increasing numbers of students in STEM disciplines. A new STEM Teaching and Learning facility would include modern wet bench teaching laboratories that incorporate active learning principles, foster cross-disciplinary teaching and learning, and support developing and evolving changes in curriculum and its delivery. This facility will give students a more grounded realistic experience in the STEM disciplines by allowing instructors to further develop pedagogies that will better prepare students for the professional workplace, as well as to develop critical thinking and problem solving skills. This facility would also create opportunities to address the emerging pedagogies that involve project based laboratories using laboratory experiments running multiple days or even an entire semester long. It also creates opportunities for instructors from different disciplines to work collaboratively to explore/create new methodologies to teach STEM courses. The overarching purpose and goal of the facility is to improve and enhance the undergraduate learning experience, support experiential teaching and learning, attract and retain more students in STEM disciplines, and better prepare those students for professional careers in fields of science, health and engineering. In addition, the facility will create opportunities for increased utilization, operational efficiencies, and consolidation of instructional support services. Space that would be vacated by bringing the currently dispersed and obsolete teaching laboratories together, will be re- purposed and renovated to address primarily research laboratory needs of the campus.

Describe the scope of the project

This new facility will support primarily laboratory based instruction associated with courses in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Preliminary planning anticipates construction of an approximate 120,000 gross square foot facility that would house undergraduate teaching laboratories for biological related sciences, chemistry, neuroscience, physics, and engineering disciplines in a central campus location. The teaching laboratories would emphasize active- learning design concepts, and provide a range of sizes to best accommodate freshman-level and upperclassmen courses. The teaching laboratories would be modular and flexible in design, incorporate and leverage the use of modern building systems and technology, and allow academic programs to respond to changing instructional models, including student research. In addition to wet bench teaching laboratories, the facility is envisioned to also include computer labs, informal study areas, break-out spaces, and potentially a campus-wide computerized testing center. The MSU Board of Trustees recently authorized planning so that a more specific plan can be developed.

Please provide detailed, yet appropriately concise responses to the following questions that will enhance our understanding of the requested project:

1. How does the project enhance Michigan’s job creation, talent enhancement and economic growth initiatives on a local, regional and/or statewide basis?

This project aligns with state and national priorities to increase the number and diversity of STEM and STEM-related graduates. Michigan State University provides educational opportunity to over 50,000 students and has positioned itself to provide the State with the type of graduates employers demand and who drive economic growth in the 21st century. In fact, over the last ten years STEM based student credit hours at MSU have increased by approximately 40 percent. Currently, 14,000 undergraduate students at MSU are enrolled in a STEM degree-granting program, a 50 percent enrollment increase over the past 10 years.

of 7

While enrollments have increased, it is vitally important to educate and graduate even more students in STEM-related disciplines, and to provide the type of curriculum and applied knowledge that successfully transfers to the student’s chosen career. Students graduating in the STEM disciplines generally command a higher salary. In 2013, the average wage among all occupations in Michigan was $21.40 per hour, compared to $34.40 per hour for STEM occupations. (Source: DTMB, Bureau of Labor Market Information and Strategic Initiatives) Further, the state projects that by 2020, approximately 1 in 5 new job opportunities in the state requiring post-high school education will be in STEM related disciplines.

Michigan State University is a national leader for improving science and math education. Its faculty are involved in funded research to improve science and math education. These funded grants contribute to our intellectual capacity, and spur further grant activities, increasing our research expenditures and productivity. They create opportunities for student engagement and success at both the undergraduate and graduate level, and provide economic development by bringing research dollars to the state and local economy. These research projects also inform and advance the methods and approaches for educating students in STEM. Examples of these funded research projects include $5.0 million from the Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow Foundation for STEM Success, designed to help students who didn’t receive the pre-college math and science training they needed to pursue degrees and, ultimately, careers in science- related fields; $1.5M from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to expand efforts for students in science to learn effectively and graduate successfully, especially those who belong to groups underrepresented in science; and part of a national effort to improve science and math education as one of eight sites across the country selected by the Association of American Universities to host a project designed to improve science and math education.

During the planning, design and construction process it is estimated that the project will employ approximately 400 people in jobs ranging from architects and engineers, to skilled trades and laborers for a collective period of approximately 36 months. This does not include the purchase of equipment, materials, and supplies, or the people employed in these businesses that support the construction of a building.

Overall, investment in this project will enhance economic growth regionally and state-wide in a number of ways. It will allow the University to continue to attract and retain talented faculty and students; prepare students for careers in fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; create an environment that encourages innovation and entrepreneurship; and attract federal and corporate research dollars. Long-range economic impact will be realized by producing more highly-trained, sought after graduates for professional careers in science, health, and engineering fields throughout the State of Michigan.

2. How does the project enhance the core academic and/or research mission of the institution?

The teaching and learning of MSU’s over 50,000 students, including approximately 14,000 STEM-related undergraduate students, is core to our mission. Over 80 percent of MSU’s instructional facilities are at least 40 years old, and of these approximately 70 percent of the STEM-related teaching laboratories are in facilities that are over 40 years old. Further, MSU has not constructed a facility focused on teaching and learning in over 45 years. With the national and state agenda focused on an increase in STEM education, coupled with an aging infrastructure, dispersed facilities, and the increase in STEM course enrollments at MSU, it is a top university priority to create new STEM instructional space.

of 7

Michigan State University is one of eight universities participating in the Association of American Universities’ Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative. The initiative is aimed at improving the quality of undergraduate teaching and learning in STEM fields, encouraging faculty members to use student-centered, active learning pedagogy in their classes. MSU is at the forefront of changing the traditional model of STEM teaching and learning to one that involves three dimensional learning, providing students with opportunities to develop models, construct explanations, and engage in arguments using evidence. This transformational model of teaching and learning requires that courses, and the instructional facilities that support them, be more student-centered, interactive, and technologically robust.

The university recently established CREATE for STEM Institute, a joint endeavor of the College of Natural Science and the College of Education, in coordination with the Office of the Provost. The institute’s mission is to improve teaching and learning in the STEM disciplines for students from grades K-16 through research and development efforts. In addition, the National Science Foundation recently awarded a $3.6 million grant to a team of MSU researchers and colleagues in Finland to develop and test innovative project-based science units in physics and chemistry classes designed to increase student engagement and encourage underrepresented groups of students to continue learning science.

A modern STEM Teaching and Learning Facility will not only leverage the research being conducted at MSU on STEM teaching and learning, but will facilitate scientific interactions at the undergraduate student level and improve the University’s ability to successfully compete for and retain talented students in STEM disciplines. There is untapped training potential that can be developed with the establishment of a facility that places instructors together based on the ability to create and investigate emerging pedagogies. These new pedagogies will help to ensure student success and better prepare students for graduation and professional careers in the fields of scientific discovery, health and engineering.

3. How does the project support investment in or adaptive re-purposing of existing facilities and infrastructure?

By centrally locating the STEM Teaching and Learning facility it would create an opportunity to re-allocate released space in at least 6 of our campus buildings, involving no less than 20-25 spaces that could, through renovations, create much needed additional space for wet bench and computational research needs. The space made available for adaptive repurposing is located within some of our most research intensive buildings including Biomedical and Physical Sciences, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Engineering, Giltner Hall, and Natural Science.

4. Does the project address or mitigate any current health/safety deficiencies relative to existing facilities? If yes, please explain

The majority of instructional laboratory functions that will be placed in the new facility are currently located in buildings that are over 40 years old, including Chemistry, North Kedzie Hall, Natural Science, and Giltner Hall. While there have been renovations to these rooms over time, they come with inherent infrastructure commensurate with the age of the buildings. The new construction will address obsolescence of infrastructure and room configurations that do not support active and interdisciplinary learning. Renovation of the vacated spaces as a subsequent set of projects would bring the spaces into compliance with current codes.

of 7

5. How does the institution measure utilization of its existing facilities, and how does it compare relative to established benchmarks for education facilities? How does the project help to improve the utilization of existing space and infrastructure, or conversely how does current utilization support the need for additional space and infrastructure?

Michigan State University engages in a multi-faceted process for measuring and optimizing utilization of its existing facilities. For instructional space the University tracks and measures utilization of both day-time use and distribution, as well as enrollment and seat usage. The overall utilization rate for instructional space ranks comparably with our peer institutions of the Big 10. The proposed project will include a planning principle to facilitate the sharing of these resources, including equipment and staff with the intent to increase the overall utilization. For research laboratories and academic office space the University employs a university-wide process that includes space metrics for quantitatively measuring the productivity and utilization. Over the last ten years, the productivity and utilization of research labs and academic office space has improved by approximately 30 percent in terms of research expenditures per square foot. During the same time period, research and office space square feet per FTE has remained steady, thus achieving improved efficiency and growth within existing facilities. This space is benchmarked using data from the National Science Foundation Science and Engineering Survey.

Many of the university’s STEM-related instructional labs are housed in buildings that are over 40 years old with obsolete and aging infrastructure, comprising over 70 percent of the space currently serving STEM-related laboratory instruction. With few exceptions, the instructional labs have received minimal upgrades, are inefficiently configured, and ineffective for supporting active-learning principles required for student success.

This project will co-locate 20-25 existing instructional labs, which are currently dispersed among seven buildings, into a central location which will improve cross-disciplinary teaching and utilization, and operational efficiencies. The new facility will provide modern building systems and technology infrastructure for enhancing the learning experience, as well as flexible lab configurations to foster collaborative and interdisciplinary instructional methods and support experiential learning. In addition to significantly improving the learning experience, the new facility will also address the needed capacity to support the recent 40 percent growth in STEM- related credit hours, and support continued growth in STEM-related fields. Furthermore, overall space utilization will be improved through the repurposing of several existing instructional labs to meet research space needs in STEM fields.

6. How does the institution intend to integrate sustainable design principles to enhance the efficiency and operations of the facility?

Michigan State University's design guidelines and construction standards require that all new buildings and major renovation projects are designed to qualify for at least LEED Silver Certified as defined by the most current version of the United States Green Building Council LEED design requirements. Where appropriate and cost effective, selection of materials and equipment will be considered that would move the facility beyond LEED Silver. In addition, the University's Energy Transition Plan includes long range energy models for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced energy consumption of existing and new facilities, including a goal of 15 percent of energy consumption from renewable sources by the end of 2015. To that end, the university recently approved the installation of solar array panels on five parking lots, and transition away from coal use by 2016. The university also evaluates

of 7

functional requirements, and seeks opportunities for efficiency and productivity improvements in its space design and allocation.

7. Are match resources currently available for the project? If yes, what is the source of the match resources? If no, identify the intended source and the estimated timeline for securing said resources?

Yes. It is expected that the match will be from MSU capital and/or bonding paid from general fund revenue capital.

8. If authorized for construction, the state typically provides a maximum of 75% of the total cost for university projects and 50% of the total cost for community college projects. Does the institution intend to commit additional resources that would reduce the state share from the amounts indicated? If so, by what amount?

We respectfully request state consideration and authorization of 75% of the total project cost. Should the state authorization be less than 75% we are open to funding a higher share of the project cost, but doing so would require the university to re-prioritize other high priority needs in order to contribute a higher amount.

9. Will the completed project increase operating costs to the institution? If yes, please provide an estimated cost (annually, and over a five-year period) and indicate whether the institution has identified available funds to support the additional cost.

Building operating costs for utilities, custodial, and maintenance are estimated at approximately $800,000 annually, or $4.0M over a 5-year period, based on current dollars. Efficiency gains are anticipated for instructional laboratory operations as a result of centralizing the laboratories that will enable the sharing of equipment and staff resources. The building will also be designed with energy efficiency features to minimize the cost of operations. Further the conversion of the vacated instructional laboratories to research space will partially off-set the operating expenses by cost avoidance for construction of approximately 60,000 net square feet of research space. Yes, funding is identified in the long-range funding model.

10. What impact, if any, will the project have on tuition costs?

This project will not have any direct impact on tuition costs.

11. If this project is not authorized, what are the impacts to the institution and its students?

The students and faculty will be disadvantaged in both learning experiences and research activities as we have to accommodate programs in spaces that are insufficient in capacity, have obsolete infrastructure, and physical designs that do not support the evolving pedagogical methods for STEM-related instruction. Further it hinders our ability to attract, retain, and graduate students when their experiences are limited due to facility constraints. This will affect the quality of the University’s teaching and outreach efforts in STEM disciplines, its ability to increase undergraduate student research opportunities, and its ability to attract and retain talented faculty and students. It also will affect the University’s ability to compete for federally funded contracts and grants that ultimately would have a positive impact, both economically and intellectually on the campus and throughout the state of Michigan.

of 7

12. What alternatives to this project were considered? Why is the requested project preferable to those alternatives?

The University has for many years focused on renovation of existing instructional spaces, including teaching laboratories. Over the last 10 years a significant number of instructional rooms have received some form of renovation and/or technology upgrade. However, in recent years it has become clear that this approach is no longer sufficient. Replacing the furniture, finishes, and technology in the existing rooms does not address the issues of increasing enrollments, or changes in curriculum and learning methods. In many instances we cannot accommodate the necessary changes, such as increased space per student station and increased capacity to meet enrollment demands. This results in sub-optimal learning spaces. The emphasis on active learning, supported by research, has led us to plan much more strategically on how we address this need. It has become clear that accommodating broader changes, at a quicker pace is necessary to provide our faculty and students with the tools they need to succeed in the classroom and beyond. As a result of this the preferred alternative is to construct a new instructional laboratory facility.

Michigan State University has not constructed a dedicated instructional facility in over 45 years. As previously noted a majority of the instructional laboratories are located in facilities over 40 years old, dispersed across campus, and embedded in primarily research intensive facilities. The requested project will create a hub for STEM education by placement of 20-25 instructional laboratories and related instructional spaces in one place, in a central campus location. This will allow us to put science on display and engage the broader student body and community in ways today that we can only imagine. Further, MSU has seen a 38% increase in overall STEM credit hours. Accommodating this growth in existing space has become increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to accommodate. For example, the Chemistry lecture hall cannot be expanded to accommodate increased enrollments or active learning principles. Expanding the footprint of the lecture hall into adjacent space is not feasible due to infrastructure reasons and would also displace other functions. By creating this STEM hub we believe it positions the university to support and encourage increased student participation in these disciplines. It will allow us to create spaces that support and encourage active learning principles, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, and higher enrollments in STEM.

Appendix H: Facility for Rare Isotope Beams

Facility for Rare Isotope Beams

Background

The Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) is a critical project for American science and the State of Michigan. FRIB not only will keep MSU on the cutting edge of nuclear science, but also will ensure the training of the nuclear scientists of tomorrow while bolstering the economies of mid-Michigan and the entire State. FRIB will cost $730 million to design and build. In FY14, the State made a commitment to bond and service the community cost share of $94.5 million. Construction began in 2014 and will be completed by 2022, with current forecasts anticipating early completion in fiscal year 2021. FRIB is projected to create hundreds of jobs in Michigan, while bringing in more than $1 billion of economic activity to Michigan in the next 10 years. MSU looks forward to continuing its partnership with the State of Michigan to assure the successful completion of this project.

MSU continues to work with the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) in developing FRIB and continues to manage against the annual plan prepared by MSU and approved by DOE-SC. On August 1, 2013, the DOE-SC approved Critical Decisions (CD) 2-3a, baselining the scope, cost and schedule, and authorizing the start of civil construction. The project received CD-3b approval (start of technical construction) in August 2014 with project progress well in advance of DOE-SC targets, a necessary approval for assuring fiscal year 2021 completion.

The centerpiece of the new user facility will be a superconducting linear accelerator that will increase dramatically the reach of rare-isotope research in the United States. The accelerator will produce isotopes that normally exist only in the most extreme environments in the universe and will expand the usefulness of isotopes in a broad range of applications from modeling stars to understanding the workings of nanoscale electronic devices, opening the door for critical applications in fields such as medicine, homeland security and industry.

Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Information · understanding and make a positive difference, both locally...

Documents

Transcript of Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Information · understanding and make a positive difference, both locally...