Fiscal Governance and Budgetary Surveillance Reform in the EU€¦ · DG ECFIN 1 Fiscal governance...

DG ECFIN

1

Fiscal governance and budgetary surveillance reform

in the EU

Anna IaraEuropean Commission

ECFIN.C.4 Fiscal governance and fiscal statistics

wiiw, 29 November 2010

DG ECFIN

2

�EU economic governance reform proposal

�Proposal for a Council directive on requirements for domestic budgetary frameworks

�The impact of rules-based national fiscal governance on sovereign bond spreads

Outline

DG ECFIN

3Economic governance reform

Legislative proposals: overview

Budgetary surveillance� Amendments to reg. 1466/97� Amendments to reg. 1467/97� New directive on domestic

budgetary frameworks

Macroeconomic surveillanceNew regulation on preventionand correction of macroeco-nomic imbalances

EnforcementNew regulation on effectiveenforcement of budgetarysurveillance

EnforcementNew regulation on effectiveenforcement of macroeco-nomic surveillance

DG ECFIN


Legislative proposals: budgetary surveillance

Amendments to reg. 1466/97 − EDP preventive arm� to date: medium-term objective � new: expenditure growth/prudent fiscal policy making

Amendments to reg. 1467/97 − EDP corrective arm� to date: deficit criterion� new: operationalising the debt criterion

Requirements on domestic budgetary frameworks� new: strengthen fiscal governance at member states’ level

Enforcement�new: earlier sanctions, reverse voting

DG ECFIN


Legislative proposals: macroeconomic surveillance

Macroeconomic imbalances� to date: Broad Economic Policy Guidelines: � new: focus on imbalances, formalise evaluation� preventive and corrective dimension

Enforcement (euro area)� fine (0.1% GDP) on repeated insufficient corrective

action/plan; reverse voting

DG ECFIN

� Variation in fiscal governance quality across EU members

� Fiscal frameworks effective in supporting sound fiscalpolicies

� EU budgetary framework insufficiently entrenchedin national fiscal governance– enforcement cannot derive only from EU level provisions– EMU needs consistency of domestic and EU budgetary

frameworks


Domestic budgetary frameworks: point of departure

DG ECFIN


Domestic budgetary frameworks: where do member states stand?

CY EL

MT

UK

PT

IE

AT

RO

LV

IT

SK

FI HU

SI

CZBE

FR

DE

PL

LU

SEDK

EE

NL ES

LT

BG

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Fiscal rule index (standardised), 2009

MT

BF

in

dex

(st

and

ard

ised

), 2

009

DG ECFIN

8Reform proposals

Domestic budgetary frameworks: why useful?

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Ave

rage

prim

ary

cycl

ical

ly-a

djus

ted

bala

nce,

as

a pe

rcen

tage

of G

DP

25% lowest values of the fiscal rule

index

Low values of the fiscal rule index (less than median but above

first quartile)

High values of the fiscal rule index (more than median but below fourth

quartile)

25% highest values of the fiscal rule index

DG ECFIN

Minimun requirements:

�accounting and statistics�macroeconomic and budgetary forecasts �numerical fiscal rules�medium-term budgetary frameworks� transparency of general government finances;

comprehensive scope of budgetary frameworks

Compliance of member states expected by end-2013

9Reform proposals

Draft Council directive on requirements for the budgetary frameworks of the Member States

DG ECFIN

10

Rules and risk in the euro area:

does rules-based national fiscal governance contain sovereign bond spreads?

(with Guntram B. Wolff)

Rules & risk

DG ECFIN

11Rules & risk

Sovereign bond spreads in 10 euro area members

DG ECFIN

12Rules & risk

Motivation

�High sovereign spreads - growing public debt

�Fiscal profligacy in good times

�Reform proposals calling to strengthen fiscal governance

�Commitment to consolidate

�Assess impact of fiscal rules on sovereign risk

�Unique and detailed dataset on numerical fiscal rules

Our paper

DG ECFIN

Numerical fiscal rules

Permanent constraints on summary indicators of fiscal performance (Kopits and Symansky, 1998)

Why numerical fiscal rules?

Deficit bias…

… common pool problem of governments withoutcentralised spending powers

... time inconsistent preferences

… supranational externality

13Rules & risk

DG ECFIN

�USA: von Hagen (1991); Bayoumi and Eichengreen (1994); Alesina and Bayoumi (1996); Bohn and Inman (1996)

�Creative accounting: von Hagen and Wolff (2006); Buti et al. (2007)

�Enforce compliance: Inman (1996); Ayuso-i-Casals et al. (2009)

�Commitment device: Debrun and Kumar (2007); Debrun (2007); Debrun et al. (2008)

�Forms of fiscal governance: von Hagen, 2010

14Rules & risk

Literature: fiscal rules

DG ECFIN

�Common risk factor: Favero et al. (1997); Lemmen and Goodhart (1999); Codogno et al. (2003)

�Fiscal fundamentals and transparency: Bernoth et al. (2004); Bernoth and Wolff (2008); Heppke-Falk and Wolff (2008); Schulz and Wolff (2009); Schuknecht et al. (2009)

�Banking and external imbalances: Barrios et al. (2009); Gerlach, Schulz and Wolff (2010), Ejsing and Lemke (2010)

�Fiscal institutions: Poterba and Rueben (1999);Hallerberg and Wolff (2008)

15Rules & risk

Literature: determinants of sovereign spreads

DG ECFIN

Risk neutrality – no-arbitrage condition:1 + r* = (1 – θ i, t+1)(1 + ri,t) => ri,t – r*

t = θ i, t+1with r* return to risk-free asset

ri,t return of bond issued by country iθi,t default probability of country i

Allow for risk aversion: 1 + r* = α (1 – θ i, t+1)(1 + ri,t) with α ≥ 1

=> ri,t – r*t = α t θ t

Determinants of sovereign default: θi,t = ξ (Et (Xi,t+1), Et(Bi,t+1), Et(si, t+1), ci)

Thus: ri,t – r*t = f (αt, Et(Xi,t+1), Bi,t, si,t, Et(si,t+1), ci)

16Rules & risk

Our approach

DG ECFIN

17Rules & risk

Our approach

Where do we stand?Risk neutrality – no-arbitrage condition:

1 + r* = (1 – θ i, t+1)(1 + ri,t) => ri,t – r*t = θ i, t+1

with r* return to risk-free assetri,t return of bond issued by country iθi,t default probability of country i

Allow for risk aversion: 1 + r* = α (1 – θ i, t+1)(1 + ri,t) with α ≥ 1

=> ri,t – r*t = α t θ t

Determinants of sovereign default: θi,t = ξ (Et (Xi,t+1), Et(Bi,t+1), Et(si, t+1), ci)

Thus: ri,t – r*t = f (αt, Et(Xi,t+1), Bi,t, si,t, Et(si,t+1), ci)

DG ECFIN

18Rules & risk

Aggregate risk: spread between low grade US corporate and government bonds

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Basis points

DG ECFIN

19DG Ecfin database on fiscal governance

Where do we stand?

Ru

le n

o.

Co

un

try

Typ

e

Sec

tor

Tar

get

/co

nst

rain

t

Des

crip

tio

n

Acc

ou

nti

ng

sys

tem

Tim

e fr

ame

(yea

rs)

Sta

tuto

ry b

ase

Mo

nit

ori

ng

bo

dy

En

forc

emen

t b

od

y

No

n-c

om

plia

nce

act

ion

s

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

1.10

1.11

1.12

1011 AT BBR CG, RG, LG

Budget balance as % of GDP

Deficit targets for the CG, RG (Länder), and LG contained in a National Stability Pact within a multiannual budgetary setting.

ESA 2 . . . .




ESA 4 . . . .




ESA 4 L GS GS Possibility of sanctions

2011 BE ER CG Real expenditure growth rate

Real growth of primary expenditure for CG ought to be equal or lower than 0%.

BA 4 CA IND, NP GS No pre-defined action

2021 BE RR CG Growth of revenues in relation to GDP growth

Growth of fiscal revenues has to be in line with GDP growth (both in nominal terms).

BA 4 CA No body MF, GS No pre-defined action

DG ECFIN

� Dimensions– legal base– room for setting/revising objectives– nature of monitoring/enforcement body – enforcement mechanisms– media visibility

� Aggregation using random weights

� Decreasing benefit from multiple rules

� Adjusted to coverage of general government finance

20Rules & risk

The fiscal rule index

DG ECFIN

21Rules & risk

The fiscal rule index in 11 euro area members

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 year

Fiscal rule index

AT

BE

DE

EL

ES

FI

FR

IE

IT

NL

PT

DG ECFIN

Estimating equationri,t = β1 risk t + β2 bas i,t + β3 risk t bas i,t +

+ β4 fgdp i,t + β5 risk t fgdp i,t + + β6 debt i,t + β7 risk t debt i,t + + β8 bali,t + β9 risk t bal i,t + + β10 fri i,t + β11riskt frii,t + ci + ui,t

22Rules & risk

Empirical approach

Issues� control for liquidity risk� endogeneity� annual data� separated impact of fri dimensions

DataBloomberg, EuroMTS, Ameco

DG ECFIN

23Rules & risk

Estimation resultsuscorp 0.19 *** 0.14 *** 0.08 *** 0.08 *** 0.07 0.08 *** 0.06 ** 0.07 *** 0.05 **

(0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.01) (0.04) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02)

FRI 4.37 *** 3.90 *** -0.88 5.58 -1.14 -10.22 *** -0.48 -9.32 ***

(1.59) (1.32) (1.48) (3.54) (3.05) (3.19) (2.93) (3.19)

uscorp *FRI -0.02 *** -0.02 *** -0.01 ** -0.02 ** -0.02 *** -0.004 -0.02 *** -0.01(0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.00) (0.005) 0.00 0.01

balance -4.04 *** 0.69 -5.27 *** -4.29 *** -0.93 -3.64 *** -1.35(0.61) (1.22) (1.61) (1.03) (1.62) (1.02) (1.62)

debt 0.81 *** 0.75 *** 0.57 *** 1.57 *** 1.63 *** 1.03 ** 1.40 *** 0.97 **

(0.22) (0.18) (0.18) (0.47) (0.45) (0.40) (0.44) (0.39)

uscorp *balance -0.02 *** -0.02 *** -0.01 **

(0.00) (0.01) (0.01)

uscorp *debt 0.001 0.002 ** 0.002 **

(0.001) (0.001) (0.001)

bid-ask spread -13.50 14.15 -357.18 ** -193.61(42.29) (38.20) (148.26) (134.16)

uscorp *bid-ask spread 0.882 ** 0.542(0.366) (0.336)

N 107 107 107 107 117 69 69 69 69

r2 0.60 0.73 0.82 0.86 0.42 0.86 0.91 0.87 0.91

Estimation with panel fixed effects. Standard errors in parentheses. Time period: 1999-2009 (107 observations),

1999-2010 (117 observations), 2003-2009 (69 observations).

DG ECFIN

24Rules & risk

Marginal effect of fiscal rules on sovereign bond spreads

-15

-10

-5

0

5

1 51 101

151

201

251

301

351

401

451

501

551

601

651

701

751

DG ECFIN

25Rules & risk

Whi

ch c

ompo

nent

of

fisc

al r

ules

?

uscorp 0.08 *** 0.06 *** 0.11 *** 0.11 *** 0.13 *** 0.00 -0.040.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.08

FRI 3.90 ***

1.32

uscorp *FRI -0.02***

0.00

FRI1 3.46 ** -10.08 **

1.40 4.85

uscorp *FRI1 -0.02 *** -0.03 *

0.00 0.02

FRI2 4.06 *** 5.171.23 3.88

uscorp *FRI2 -0.02***

-0.020.00 0.02

FRI3 3.24 *** 3.391.09 4.45

uscorp *FRI3 -0.02 *** 0.030.00 0.02

FRI4 3.41 *** 0.651.24 2.67

uscorp *FRI4 -0.02***

0.010.00 0.01

FRI5 3.96 *** 4.781.32 4.70

uscorp *FRI5 -0.02 *** -0.010.00 0.01

balance -4.04 *** -4.18 *** -4.02 *** -4.09 *** -3.90 *** -4.08 *** -4.29 ***

0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.65 0.61 0.62

debt 0.75***

0.72***

0.73***

0.73***

0.79***

0.84***

0.88***

0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.21

N 107 107 107 107 107 107 107

R² 0.82 0.81 0.82 0.82 0.80 0.81 0.84

marginal effect of FRI_i

at uscorp =500 -6.15 -7.12 -4.79 -4.73 -5.72 -5.45 -24.71

DG ECFIN

� Quarterly frequency� Measurement of aggregate risk: VIX� Dataset with longer and better bid-ask spread series

(Gerlach et al. (2010))� Sample: year < 2009; exclude IE

26Rules & risk

Robustness checks

DG ECFIN

� National fiscal rules reduce sovereign spreads in timesof higher risk aversion– economically and statistically significant– effect of up to 100-200 bps

� Important characteristics of rules-based frameworks– legal base of rules– stringency of enforcement

� Possible way for high-risk countries to regain marketconfidence

27Rules & risk

Conclusion

Fiscal Governance and Budgetary Surveillance Reform in the EU€¦ · DG ECFIN 1 Fiscal governance...

Documents

Transcript of Fiscal Governance and Budgetary Surveillance Reform in the EU€¦ · DG ECFIN 1 Fiscal governance...