FINE-MAPPING AND CHARACTEIZATION OF A NOVEL FRUIT …tgc.ifas.ufl.edu/TBRT 2018/Quality/Fine-mapping...
Transcript of FINE-MAPPING AND CHARACTEIZATION OF A NOVEL FRUIT …tgc.ifas.ufl.edu/TBRT 2018/Quality/Fine-mapping...
Fine-mapping and characterization of a novel fruit shape locus in tomato
(Solanum lycopersicum L.)
*Edgar Sierra-Orozco, Reza Shekasteband, Samuel Hutton; University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center;
Eudald Illa-Berenguer, Esther van der Knaap; University of Georgia, Department of Horticulture
1
Size Shape
Wild ancestor
Very small, weighs a few grams
Round
Modern tomato
Weighs up to 1 Kg (nearly 1000-fold increase)
round, oblate (flat), long, pear-shaped, torpedo-shaped, bell pepper-shaped, etc.
Source: Tanksley, 2004.Source: Grandillo et al., 1999; van der Knaap et al., 2002; Tanksley, 2004
2
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
The tomato fruit…
~ 30 QTLs account for most of the variation in fruit shape and size (Tanksley, 2004).
Source: Rodriguez et al., 2011
Explained to a large extent by: SUN, OVATE, LC and/or FAS (Rodriguez et al.,
2013; Azzi et al., 2015).
Mutation(s) in six loci seem to have been essential in the transition from wild to modern tomato (fw2.2).
Shape
Size
3
The genetics of fruit shape and size in the domestication process
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
• There is still some fruit variation
• The Flat vs the Globe tomatoes
• Variation in:• Fruit shape
• Fruit size
• Fruit quality
4
Flat and globe shapes in fresh-market tomatoes (large-fruited)
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
HYBRIDS are developed in commercial fresh-market tomatoes (Scott, 2004; Scott et al., 2006;
Gardner, 1990; Gardner, 1992; Gardner, 2000; Panthee and Gardner, 2011)
Shape Flats Globes
Quality*
Size
*Cracking, bursting and weather check
5
The dilemma of flats and globes
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
What are the genetics of flat vs globe in fresh market tomatoes?
• Variation of major fruit shape and size genes is believed to be smaller• Preliminary work showed that FW2.2,
FW3.2, FW11.3, LC and FAS are fixed in several inbred lines of the breeding program of UF
• Knowledge of the location of the gene(s) may improve cultivar development efforts.
https://psmag.com/environment/why-you-should-be-scared-of-someone-stealing-your-genome-58082
6
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
• To fine-map a locus that underlies segregation of fruit shape in fresh-market tomato germplasm
• To characterize its effects on fruit shape, size, and other plant morphology traits
7
Objectives
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
RESULTS
8
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
1. Mapping of the fruit shape locus
9
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
A single locus in Chromosome 12 appeared significantly associated with shape
10
CIM analysis of the SNP array
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
11
Flanking SNPs at 714,799 and 903,522 bp
(Genome Build SL3.0)
CIM analysis of the SNP array, Chromosome 12
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
12
2.5 Mbp
CIM of the upper arm of Chr. 12
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
1 Mbp
Recombinant F4 and F5 for the locus in the upper arm of chr. 12, 1 Mbp region
13
No. Plants M1 M2 FS M4 M5 Shape
F4
6 G/G G/G F/F F/F F/F Flat3 G/G G/G G/G F/G F/G Globe
11 G/G G/G G/G G/G F/G Globe18 F/G F/G G/G G/G G/G Globe8 F/F F/F G/G G/G G/G Globe8 F/F F/F F/F G/G G/G Flat
F5
10 F/F F/F G/G Flat55 F/F G/G G/G Globe1 F/F F/G G/G Flat1 G/G G/G F/G Globe1 G/G F/G F/F Flat
11 G/G G/G F/F Globe55 G/G F/F F/F Flat
400 Kbp region
14
Germplasm surveyINTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
2. Characterization of fruit and plant morphology
15
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Fruit characterization
16
Globe (G/G)Heterozygous (F/G)Flat (F/F)
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Average weight of fruits
17
F/F
F/G
G/G
↑ 36% weight
↑13% weight
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
18
Basic measurements
F/FF/G
G/GF/F
F/G
G/G
↑4.9% height
↑21.9% height
Height Width
↑7.6% width
↑2.6% width
G/G
F/F
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Fruit shoulders
19
G/G
F/F
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
20
Blockiness descriptors
G/G
F/F
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
21
Effects on plant biomass
F/F
F/G
G/G
↓ 20.3% weight
↓5.1% weight
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
22
Effects on fruit pedicel
22
F/FF/G
G/GF/F
F/G
G/G
↑12.1% length
↑88% length↓22.8% width
↓2.8% width
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
• The fruit shape locus was narrowed to a 400 Kb area in the upper arm of chromosome 12.
• There is a strong candidate mutation that segregates completely with shape even in other breeding lines.
• The locus affects several fruit traits, some of the main are fruit size, fruit shape index (width/height), fruit shoulders, fruit height and proximal blockiness.
• The locus also affects plant biomass and fruit pedicel.
23
Conclusions
INTRODUCTION RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Acknowledgements
• My advisor Dr. Samuel Hutton
• Tomato Breeding lab team at the GCREC• Lab staff: Tim, Nate, Judith, Dolly, Jose, Keri, Kazuyo
• Lab Grads: Rebecca, Jessica and Jazmin
• Committee members: Dr. Tong Geon Lee, Dr. Shinsuke Agehara, Dr. Esther van der Knaap
• COMEXUS Fulbright-Garcia Robles scholarship
• Dr. Reza Shekasteband and Dr. Gill Upinder
24
Literature
Azzi L., Deluche C., Gevaudant F., Frangne N., Delmas F., Hernould M., Chevalier C. (2015). Fruit growth-related genes in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 66, No. 4: 1075-1086. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru527
Brewer M.T., Lang L., Fujimura K., Dujmovic N., Gray S., and van der Knaap E. (2006). Development of a controlled vocabulary and software application to analyze fruit shape variation in tomato and other plant species. Plant Physiology, 141: 15-25.
Causse, M., Friguet, C., Coiret, C., Lépicier, M., Navez, B., Lee, M., . . . Grandillo, S. (2010). Consumer Preferences for Fresh Tomato at the European Scale: A Common Segmentation on Taste and Firmness. Journal of Food Science, 75(9).
Fulton M., Chunwongse J., and Tanksley S. 1995. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 13(3), 207-209. Gardner R., (1990). ‘Mountain Delight’ tomato; NC 8288 tomato breeding line. HortScience 25(8): 989-990.
Gardner R., (1990). ‘Mountain Delight’ tomato; NC 8288 tomato breeding line. HortScience 25(8): 989-990.Gardner R. (1992). ‘Mountain Spring’ tomato; NC 8276 and NC 84173 tomato breeding lines. HortScience 27(11): 1233-1234.Gardner R. (2000). ‘Carolina Gold’, a hybrid tomato, and its parents, NC 1Y and NC 2Y. HortScience 35(5): 966-967.Grandillo S., Ku H.M., and Tanksley S.D. (1999). Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. Theor Appl Genet, 99: 978-987.Huang Z., van Houten J., Gonzalez G., Xiao H., and van der Knaap E. (2013). Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression analysis of SUN, OFP and YABBY gene family in
tomato. Mol Genet Genomics, 288: 111-129. doi:10.1007/s00438-013-0733-0Panthee D., and Gardner R. (2011). ‘Mountain Majesty’: A tomato spotted wilt virus-resistant fresh-market hybrid tomato and its parents NC 714 and NC 1CS. HortScience 46(9):
1321-1323.R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL. https://www.R-project.org/.Rodriguez G., Muños S., Anderson C., Sim S., Michel A., Causse M., McSpadden B., Francis D., and van der Knaap E. 2011. Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC and FAS in the tomato
germplasm and the relationship to fruit shape diversity. Plant Physiology. Vol. 156.Rodriguez G.R., Kim H.J., van der Knaap E. (2013). Mapping of two suppressors of OVATE (sov) loci in tomato. Heredity, 111: 256-264. doi:10.1038/hdy.2013.45Scott JW. (2004). Fla. 7946 tomato breeding line resistant to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici races 1, 2 and 3. HortScience 39(2): 440-441.Scott JW., Olson SM., Bryan HH., Bartz JA., Maynard DN., and Stoffella PJ. (2006). ‘Solar Fire’ Hybrid tomato: Fla. 7776 tomato breeding line. HortScience 41(6): 1504-1505.Tanksley S.D. (2004). The genetic, developmental, and molecular basis of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. The Plant Cell, Vol. 16, S181-189. van der Knaap E., Lippman Z.B., Tanskley S.D. (2002). Extremely elongated tomato fruit controlled by four quantitative trait loci with epistatic interactions. Theor Appl Genet, 104:
241-247. doi:10.1007/s00122-001-0776-1Wang, J., H. Li, L. Zhang, and L. Meng. (2016). Users’ Manual of QTL IciMapping. The Quantitative Genetics Group, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural
Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, China, and Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico, D.F., Mexico25
Materials and Methods
26
INTRODUCTION M&M RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
• Mapping:• Progeny from Fla. 8111B (globe) x Fla. 8000 (flat)
• Characterization:• NILs from three different backgrounds:
• Fla. 8735 x Fla. 8059
• Fla. 7776 x Fla. 7946
• Fla. 8022 x Fla. 8021• The first, globe, recurrent parent, the second the flat
27
INTRODUCTION M&M RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Plant Material
1. Illumina Infinium SolCAP SNP array (7,720 SNPs)
28
Composite Interval Mapping Analysis (CIM) (QTL ICiMapping 4.1, Wang et al., 2016)
INTRODUCTION M&M RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Mapping of the fruit shape locus
2. Additional sequencing-based markers
Genotype a large population of segregating F2 plants
3. Markers for fine mapping
Germplasm survey using the marker at the locus
• 3 different genetic backgrounds
• Both parents and F1 set in a CRBD with 4 reps of 15 plants each• 4 weekly harvests of 8 plants
• Traits to measure:• Fruit size
• Several fruit shape traits (Tomato Analyzer 2.2, Brewer et al., 2006)
• Plant biomass
• Fruit pedicel (length and width)
29
INTRODUCTION M&M RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Characterization
Statistical Analysis• Linear Mixed Effects Model
• Fixed effect: Genotype• Random effect: Block
• post hoc analysis by Tukey’s HSD (P≤0.05)
• R software
Fruit shape index
30
INTRODUCTION M&M RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
• Flats are more top heavy
• Even though fruits are asymmetric both horizontally and vertically, the locus only affected the horizontal asymmetry and not the vertical asymmetry of the fruit
• Globes fit better a circular shape whereas globes fit better a rectangular fit
31
INTRODUCTION M&M RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Other fruit shape traits affected by the locus