Construction of Japanese Patent Database and Preliminary Findings on Patenting Activities in Japan
Findings and Results from the CDP Japan 2009 Report
-
Upload
tbli-conference -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
474 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Findings and Results from the CDP Japan 2009 Report
TBLI 2010
Carbon Disclosure Project (www.cdproject.net)[email protected]
Name of presentation
Name of presenter
CDP2010
Background to CDP
The Power of Transparency
Not-for-profit organisation founded in 2000
Annual climate change Information Request sent from:
• 534 investors with assets of $64 trillion
• 50 Supply Chain Members
• 19 public sector bodies
2,500 companies answered the questions in 2009
CDP is the global standard for measurement and reporting of climate change information.
“To collect and distribute high quality information that motivates investors, corporations and governments to take action to prevent dangerous climate change.”
Companies and investors that are
able to assess risks and seize new
opportunities will be ahead of the
curve in terms of global
competitiveness… that is why the
work of the Carbon Disclosure
Project is crucial.
“
”Ban Ki Moon
Secretary-General ,United Nations
CDP’s annual cycle of improvement
Information Request sent to companies on
behalf of CDP signatory investors
Companies disclose against the Information Request; CDP analyses responses and reports findings to signatory investors
Information Request refined with feedback
from investors and companies
3
CDP 2010 Samples
CDP in >60 countries worldwide
800 FTSE All-World Developed
800 S&P/IFCI Emerging Market
Global 500
US companies issuing bonds 180
FTSE Euro first 300
Nordic 200
Asia 135 (ex-JICK)
Central & Eastern Europe 100
Latin America 50
Electric utilities 250
Transport 100
Total 31 samples, 20 country sample including Japan 500
Other Opportunities
Physical Opportunities
Regulatory Opportunities
Other Risks
Physical Risks
Regulatory Risks
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Recognize Don't know Don't recognize
CDP 2009 Japan 500 Result
Japanese companies recognized Regulatory Risk & Opportunities
CDP 2009 – Insights of Japan 500
Japanese companies disclosed emissions Scope 1 & 2
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
4000000
4500000
Outside of Japan Inside of Japan
China
USA
SingaporeThai
Mexcio
Taiwan
Malaysia
Mandantory reporting 650 million tonnes CO2-e
47%
Japan total 1.37 billion tonnes CO2-e
100%
Companies emissions Reporting to CDP
523 million tonnes CO2-e
38% of Japan Total
M tCO2-e
M tCO2-e1500 3000
CDP 2009 Japan 500 Result
46
27
15
47
Absolute targetIntensity based targetBoth absolute and intensity based targetNo reduction planDon't answer
34
123
44
6
Financial boundaryOperational boundaryShare based boundaryOtherNo Answer
Reporting boundary (%) Reduction target (%)
CDP 2009 – Response Trends
International comparison of Response Trends
Report on Annual Re-
port
Disclose GHG emissions
Reduction Targets
Disclose Forecast
Verify Emissions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
70
68
51 45
49 50 52
34 29
26
54 55
35 30 32
67
78
88
68
33
Global 500 US 500 UK 350 Japan 500
Based on response number: 409 of Global 500, 332 of US500, 236 of UK350, 187 of Japan500
CDP 2009 Finding
Based on response number: 409 of Global 500, 332 of US500, 236 of UK350, 187 of Japan500
Business Travel External Distribution Use & Disposal Supply Chain0
10
20
30
40
50
60
40
21 14
15
32
9 5 5
46
17
13 8
24
48
25
18
Global 500 US 500 UK 350 Japan 500
Measurement & Reporting Obligation
TBLI 2010
International comparison of Response Trends of Scope 3
Increasing CDP Data Use
CDP Data available on Bloomberg
CDSB
“CDSB works to develop a globally accepted framework, based on existing standards, for corporate reporting on climate change.”
TBLI 2010
California Climate Action Registry, CDP, CERES, Climate Group, IETA, World Economic Forum, WRI
Climate Disclosure Standard Board (CDSB)
Technical Working Group: Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers
Association of Chartered Certified Accountants
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
International Federation of Accountants
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants
www.cdsb-global.org
CDSB 2010
CDSB Investor Engagement Program 2010
Responde.g., consolidation trends and preferences
to user needs for consistent and comparable information
Understande.g., credibility issues; indeterminate standards for carbon intensities
for the application of climate risk-related disclosures in portfolio construction
Identify e.g., placement of information relative to financial reporting
models supporting use of climate risk-related disclosure
Determinee.g. influence of climate risk-related information on investment decisions,
benefits associated with mainstream climate change-related disclosure
CDSB’s investor engagement program complements the Carbon Disclosure Project’s annual demand for climate information and the recent successful INCR petition to the SEC requiring clearer guidance on reporting climate risk.
CDP Water Disclosure Project
To raise awareness and understanding of the business risks and opportunities around water
To make meaningful reporting on water standard corporate practice globally within 5 to 10 years
To support and accelerate the development of standard measures and performance benchmarks
To provide data that informs decision-making by investors, companies and governments
To catalyse action towards sustainable water management
CDP Water Disclosure – Goals13
CDP Water Disclosure Project 2010
CPD Water Disclosure Project 2010
Focus on world’s largest companies in sectors that are water intensive or face particular water-related risk
– Automotive
– Chemicals
– Food & beverage
– Mining
– Oil & gas
– Pharmaceuticals
– Power generation
– Semiconductors
All companies are encouraged to respond (regardless of whether they are one of the 302)
14
Companies selected for 2010
CDP Water 2010 Information Request
CDP Water Disclosure – 2010 Information Request15
CDP Water Disclosure Project 2010
CDP Water 2010
Questions cover:
For companies’ own operations and supply chains:
– Water stress (% of own ops/key water-intensive inputs in water-stressed areas)
– Physical risks
– Regulatory risks
– Other risks (e.g. product, reputational and litigation risk)
Detrimental water-related impacts in past 5 years
Opportunities
Linkages between water and energy/carbon
16