FINDING THE WAY BACK: variables in asymmetric route choice Margarita Greene_Rodrigo Mora_Hernán...
-
Upload
sophia-lindsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
description
Transcript of FINDING THE WAY BACK: variables in asymmetric route choice Margarita Greene_Rodrigo Mora_Hernán...
FINDING THE
WAY BACK:
variables in asymmetric
route choice
Margarita Greene_Rodrigo Mora_Hernán Kirsten_Daniel Wurman SSS6
__________________the initial question______________some relevant literature________________________five cases______________________final remarks
FINDING THE WAY
BACK:
variables in asymmetric
route choice
__________________the initial question______________some relevant literature________________________five cases______________________final remarks
recursive asymmetric trips as an opportunity to reveal relevant aspects in route choice
ROUTE CHOICE_cost (time, money)_perception of risk_environmental factor_aesthetics
spatial variables_decision places during the trip_
importance of visual fields_perception of distance_
__________________the initial question______________some relevant literature________________________five cases______________________final remarks
PERCEPTION OF DISTANCE:
_Canter and Kragg (1975)…shorter routes are overestimated, while larger are underestimated
_Sadalla and Staplin (1980), Sadalla and Magel (1980)…perception of distance is affected by turns and intersection
_Montello (1992)…distance assessment can also be affected by memory loading
_Golledge (1995) asymmetric paths in a university campus • individuals paths vary in paper and real-world• individuals generally do not retrace routes, especially in orthogonal environments• they assign a “cost” to turns, preferring paths that demand fewer turns• individuals adapt their navigation decisions constantly
SPACE SYNTAX
and within SPACE SYNTAX:
_Hillier and Iida (2005)
topological and angular properties of urban grids are better predictors of movement patterns than metric properties
_Conroy-Dalton (2003) longest leg and angular deviation play a significant role in route choice
(the British Library theorem)
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Desk Location A
Enquiry Desk
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Desk
Shelves
Shelves
Shelves
Desk Location A
Enquiry Desk
24º
66º
• Spatial decision-making is a negotiation process
• In metric and topological equal conditions, the
longest leg route will be chosen providing that the path offers the minimum
angle of deviation.
MINIMISINGANGLES OF DEVIATION
THE BRITISH LIBRARY THEOREM Conroy-Dalton (2003)
__________________the initial question______________some relevant literature________________________five cases______________________final remarks
FIVE CASES
30 students of the MSc Programme, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chilewere asked to recall a frequent asymmetric route from personal experience
five cases were selected.
Felipe Lanuza
1_Visual Assessment of Metric Distance
• Trip between office and University Campus.
• Trip involves 8 turns and several street crossings.
• It also involves crossing the Mapocho river.
• Two Decision Points were identified: A and B.
• Longest leg versus distance assessment are being negotiated at A and B. Due to street crossing a different balance results in the way to and fro.
O-DD-O
A
B
2_First Leg Theorem and Preservation of Linearity
Daniel Martínez
O
O
x
y
O
D
O
D
38
9
3614 76
9
1242
y
x
• During path OD, the student somehow negotiates between continuing his path _maintaining his inertia_ or saving metric distance, though increasing the trip’s topological cost
• During the return trip, the student faces the same negotiation.
Both O-D trip and D-O trip involve two routes, each of them with one decision point: x and y respectively
3_Enrique Gonzalez
3_Assessing Angles in a Multiple Choice Trip
O
DO
D
xy
wz
2666
4244 63
25
7523
7031
60
21
O
DO
D
xy
wz
• Both O-D and D-O trips involve three possible routes. • Two decision points at each of these trips: x,y and w,z
As the student approximates the destination the angle of deviation changes reducing the “cost” of turning.
Again, as he reaches the origin the angle of deviation changes.
Jose Pablo Flores
4_Environmental Factors in Route Selection
O
D
O
D
3917
O
D74
16
85.5 98.4
the OD route is clearly shorter , nevertheless the student chooses a longer route in the way back
The return trip is longer (98.4 vs 85.5 metres) yet simpler in topological terms.
The student reports choosing the second trip because of its attractiveness.
5_Hernan Kirsten
5_Avoid Backtracking
The OD trip starts with the longest leg and minimum angle deviation, yet is longer in metric terms.The choice of the return trip involves a small deviation _to the bakery_ and stop. This allows a reassessment of the trip, where the minimum angle deviation theorem again encourages the s2 route, specially considering that the backtracking is at the end of the journey and not visible form the Decision Point.
__________________the initial question______________some relevant literature________________________five cases______________________final remarks
Theme/Name Backtrac
king
Topologi
cal vs.
Metric
Compass
Orienta
tion
Inertia
Unstable
Environ
ments
To and
Fro
Program
Visibility
Fields
Longest
Leg
Order
and
Priority
Visual assessment of
metric distance
First leg and
preservation of linearity
Assessing angles in a
multiple choice Trip
Avoiding backtracking
Environmental factors in
route selection
• Backtracking: a natural instinct to avoid retracing steps.
• Angular, topological and metric: negotiating process that individuals undergo negotiating distance against route complexity.
• Compass orientation: a natural instinct towards the orientation of the destination.
• Route inertia: routes have an inertia that has to be broken by an external stimulus
• Unstable environments: urban space changes during the day and so offers a different choice during the day or season (for example car parks or traffic)
• To and fro programs: the way towards a destination is less liable to be affected by secondary programmes, while the return trip looses urgency and is easily diverted
• Visibility fields: length and area of visual fields affect the decision making process in route choice, although they can affect it in opposing ways (attracting or detracting alternatives)
• Longest leg: the visible longest leg in direct route is more attractive in the route choice
• Order and priority: perception of metric or topological costs vary according to the position in a path: a metric gain is perceived as more valuable at the beginning or a topological cost is perceived as less important at the end of the trip.
12
3
FINAL REMARKS: