Finding A Better Way to Cleaner Air in Texas Departing from the SIP Process.
-
Upload
lynne-fleming -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Finding A Better Way to Cleaner Air in Texas Departing from the SIP Process.
Finding A Better Finding A Better Way to Cleaner Way to Cleaner
Air in TexasAir in Texas
Departing from the SIP Departing from the SIP ProcessProcess
State Implementation State Implementation Plan ProcessPlan Process
State must develop plan State must develop plan demonstrating attainmentdemonstrating attainment
Based on science and best guesses Based on science and best guesses about the futureabout the future
Includes federal controls and Includes federal controls and additional state/local controls additional state/local controls necessary to make up any shortfallnecessary to make up any shortfall
Huge, complex document that Huge, complex document that requires constant review and requires constant review and revisionrevision
Reasons to Depart from the
SIP Process1. SIP-related emissions now dominated by Federal sources
2. Increased role of interstate/international pollution
3. Federal controls reducing SIP effectiveness
4. State/local controls more costly, less effective
5. SIP process emphasizes procedure over results
6. SIP process focuses state myopically on short-term
7. SIP process encourages delay tactics
SIP Related Emissions Now SIP Related Emissions Now Dominated by Federal Sources Dominated by Federal Sources
that the State Cannot as that the State Cannot as Efficiently and Effectively Efficiently and Effectively
ControlControlNatural Sources
5% Cars & Trucks
29%Industry32%
Off-Road34%
Houston 2007
Dallas 2007
Interstate/International Transport Interstate/International Transport More of an Issue and Outside of More of an Issue and Outside of
State’s ControlState’s Control EPA found in CAIR that
Arkansas significantly contributes to Houston ozone
TX in CAIR because impacts 2 counties in Illinois
Over ½ of ozone in DFW is background
Cannot tell another state what to do
→→
Federal Controls Making SIP Federal Controls Making SIP Process Less Effective at Process Less Effective at
Reducing EmissionsReducing Emissions
290 Counties in 2002 27 Counties in 2020
Federal SIP Controls Are Less Federal SIP Controls Are Less Expensive than State/Local Expensive than State/Local
ControlsControls
Federal SIP Controls Generally Federal SIP Controls Generally More Effective and More Effective and
Enforceable than State/Local Enforceable than State/Local ControlsControls
No-drive days 55 mph limit Idling restriction Delay commercial
hours Reduced power
take-offs Barbecue ban
SIP Process Places Emphasis on SIP Process Places Emphasis on Process over ResultsProcess over Results
Huge, complex documents requiring constant Huge, complex documents requiring constant review and revisionreview and revision
More important to have EPA approved SIP More important to have EPA approved SIP than to achieve attainment (sanctions vs. than to achieve attainment (sanctions vs. bump-up)bump-up)
Little incentive to evaluate real-world control Little incentive to evaluate real-world control effectivenesseffectiveness
Focus should be public health—not Focus should be public health—not paperworkpaperwork
SIP Process Focuses State and SIP Process Focuses State and Local Local
Government Myopically on Government Myopically on Finding Finding
Short-Term SolutionsShort-Term Solutions Houston Control Development Deadline Houston Control Development Deadline
Mar. 2006Mar. 2006
Rule Development DeadlineRule Development Deadline
Sept. 2006Sept. 2006
All Controls ImplementedAll Controls Implemented
Dec. 2008Dec. 2008
SIP Process Encourages SIP Process Encourages Resources to be Spent on Resources to be Spent on
Delay TacticsDelay TacticsEx./ Houston 8-hour SIPEx./ Houston 8-hour SIP 2010 deadline, 2007 submittal 65% NOx reduction needed Cannot timely attain—but
compelled to spend tens of millions: (1) developing unviable control strategies (that will eventually be thrown out) and (2) justifying a bump-up
money would be better spent reducing pollution
A Better PathA Better Path
Goals of Replacement Goals of Replacement StrategyStrategy
More real-world emission reductions at less More real-world emission reductions at less costcost
Address community multi-pollutant Address community multi-pollutant concerns historically overshadowed by concerns historically overshadowed by demands to focus on ozonedemands to focus on ozone
Find it and fix it (increased compliance Find it and fix it (increased compliance assistance and enforcement)assistance and enforcement)
Increased monitoring and measurementsIncreased monitoring and measurements Improve emission reduction technologiesImprove emission reduction technologies
Proposed SolutionProposed Solution Transform SIP Transform SIP Process into National Multi-Process into National Multi-
Pollutant Planning Process and Pollutant Planning Process and Give EPA Primary ResponsibilityGive EPA Primary Responsibility Give EPA primary responsibility to achieve Give EPA primary responsibility to achieve
NAAQSNAAQS EPA can regulate all sources and do so more EPA can regulate all sources and do so more
efficiently and effectively efficiently and effectively EPA can address interstate and international EPA can address interstate and international
transport which states cannottransport which states cannot States can assist EPA in achieving NAAQSStates can assist EPA in achieving NAAQS
Allows states to focus more on local pollution Allows states to focus more on local pollution concerns and reducing emissionsconcerns and reducing emissions
Develop National Multi-pollutant Planning ProcessDevelop National Multi-pollutant Planning Process
Initial Reaction to Our SIP Initial Reaction to Our SIP Reform EffortReform Effort
This is too big and difficult This is too big and difficult Politically this is not the right Politically this is not the right
timetime This is an idealistic endeavor This is an idealistic endeavor
that is bound to failthat is bound to fail I benefit from the status quoI benefit from the status quo This is better handled by This is better handled by
others”others”
““This is the right thing to do This is the right thing to do for the environment and for the environment and business, but:business, but:
Thankfully the people in these pictures did the right thing for our nation despite being told it could not be done