Financial Management Pso Project report

95
Pakistan State Oil Acknowledgement In the name of Allah, the most Gracious and the most Merciful. We thank to Allah Almighty who enables us to accomplish our project “Analysis of Financial Statement of PSO”. We are also very thankful to our parents whose prayers and efforts support us to complete our project successfully. We pay regards and gratitude to our most respectable and hardworking instructor Mr. M. Taimoor Hassan Abbasi who gave us his precious time and knowledge along with proficient skills to help us in learning how to handle difficulties in real situations and how to meet with challenges in the actual business environments. By giving us difficult tasks in this project he actually indulge us in the practice of our Quaid’s sayings “work, work and work”. Working on this project with such a sincere instructor is great honor and pleasure for us. We are also very thankful to our Department of Management Sciences and The Islamia University of Bahawalpur which provides us great opportunity to work on such an informative project in a small period of time and the faculty of management sciences who provides us with all possible intellectual human and economic resources to fulfill the requirements of this project. By the combination of all these blessings prayers and mental and physical aids we ultimately completed our project in a period of four months. Department of Management Sciences Page 1

Transcript of Financial Management Pso Project report

Page 1: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Acknowledgement

In the name of Allah, the most Gracious and the most Merciful. We thank to Allah

Almighty who enables us to accomplish our project “Analysis of Financial Statement of

PSO”. We are also very thankful to our parents whose prayers and efforts support us to

complete our project successfully. We pay regards and gratitude to our most respectable

and hardworking instructor Mr. M. Taimoor Hassan Abbasi who gave us his precious

time and knowledge along with proficient skills to help us in learning how to handle

difficulties in real situations and how to meet with challenges in the actual business

environments. By giving us difficult tasks in this project he actually indulge us in the

practice of our Quaid’s sayings “work, work and work”. Working on this project with such

a sincere instructor is great honor and pleasure for us. We are also very thankful to our

Department of Management Sciences and The Islamia University of Bahawalpur which

provides us great opportunity to work on such an informative project in a small period of

time and the faculty of management sciences who provides us with all possible

intellectual human and economic resources to fulfill the requirements of this project. By

the combination of all these blessings prayers and mental and physical aids we

ultimately completed our project in a period of four months.

Department of Management Sciences Page 1

Page 2: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Introduction

PSO is the market leader in Pakistan’s energy sector. The company has the largest network of retail outlets to serve the automotive sector and is the major fuel supplier to aviation, railways, power projects, armed forces and agriculture sector. PSO also provides Jet Fuel to Refueling Facilities at 9 airports in Pakistan and ship fuel at 3 ports. The company takes pride in continuing the tradition of excellence and is fully committed to meet the energy needs of today and rising challenges of tomorrow.

Pakistan State Oil, the largest oil marketing company in the country, is currently engaged in storage, distribution and marketing of various POL products. The company’s current market share of 82.3% in the black oil market and 59.4% share in the white oil market.

The creation of Pakistan State Oil (PSO) can be traced back to the year 1974, when on January 1st; the government took over and merged Pakistan National Oil (PNO) and Dawood Petroleum Limited (DPL) as Premiere Oil Company Limited (POCL).

Soon after that, on 3rd June 1974, Petroleum Storage Development Corporation (PSDC) came into existence. PSDC was then renamed as State Oil Company Limited (SOCL) on August 23rd 1976. Following that, the ESSO undertakings were purchased on 15th September 1976 and control was vested in SOCL. The end of that year (30th December 1976) saw the merger of the Premier Oil Company Limited and State Oil Company Limited, giving way to Pakistan state Oil (PSO).

After PSO’s inception, the corporate culture underwent a comprehensive renewal program which was fully implemented in 2004. This program over the years included the revamping of the organizational architecture, rationalization of staff, employee empowerment and transparency in decision making through cross functional teams. This new corporate renewal program has divided the company’s major operations into independent activities supported by legal, financial, informative and other services. In order to reinforce and monitor this structural change, related check and balances have been established by incorporating monitoring and control systems. Human Resource Development became one of the main priorities on the company’s agenda under this corporate reform.

It is due to this effective implementation of corporate reform and consistent application of the best industrial practices and business development strategies, that PSO has been able to maintain its market leadership in a highly competitive business environment.

January 1, 1974

INCLUDEPICTURE "mhtml:file:///C:\\Documents%20and%20Settings\\M.AHSAN\\Local%20Settings\\Temp\\Temporary%20Directory%201%20for%20PSO.zip\\History.mht!/about_us/images/logo_national.jpg" \*

Department of Management Sciences Page 2

Page 3: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

MERGEFORMAT The federal government took over the management of PNO (Pakistan National Oil) and DPL (Dawood Petroleum Limited), renamed into POCL (Premier Oil Company Limited) under marketing of Petroleum Products (Federal Control Act, 1974).

June 6, 1974

The government incorporates “Petroleum Storage Development Corporation’ PSDC.

August 23, 1976

PSCDC renamed to State Oil Company Limited (SOCL).

September 15, 1976

The Government purchases ESSO undertakings, vests their control in SOCL.

December 30, 1976

The Government merges PNO and POCL into SOCL (State Oil Company Limited) and renames it Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (PSO).

1999

The new vision program is launched with the new logo of PSO.

Department of Management Sciences Page 3

Page 4: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Vision and Mission of PSO

Vision

To excel in delivering value to customers as an innovative and dynamic energy company

that gets to the future first.

Mission

We are committed to leadership in energy market through competitive advantage in

providing the highest quality petroleum products and services to our customers.

Professionally trained, high quality, motivated workforce, working as a team in an

environment, which recognizes and rewards performance, innovation and

creativity, and provides for personal growth and development.

Lowest cost operations and assured access to long-term and cost effective

supply sources.

Department of Management Sciences Page 4

Page 5: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Sustained growth in earnings in real terms.

Highly ethical, safe environment friendly and socially responsible business

practices.

Table of ContentIntroduction iiIncome Statement 1 Balance Sheet 3 Cash Flow Statement 4 Vertical Analysis of Income Statement 5 Interpretation 5 Horizontal Analysis of Income Statement 11 Interpretation 12 Vertical Analysis of Balance Sheet 18 Interpretation 19 Horizontal Analysis of Balance Sheet 27 Interpretation 28 Vertical Analysis of Cash Flow Statement 36 Interpretation 36 Horizontal Analysis of Cash Flow Statement 43 Interpretation 43 Ratio Analysis 50 Interpretation 51 1. Short-term Solvency Ratios 51 2. Activity Ratios 53 3. Long-term Solvency Ratios 57 4. Profitability Ratios 59 Bankruptcy Analysis 65 Interpretation 65 Conclusion & Recommendations 66

Department of Management Sciences Page 5

Page 6: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Income StatementFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 (Rs. In '000) 2006 (Rs. In '000) 2007 (Rs. In '000) 2008 (Rs. In '000) 2009 (Rs. In '000)

Sales Revenue 254,362,981 353,833,345 411,989,979 583,298,190 719,412,244

Less:

Trade Discount & Allowances (586,061) (1,318,472) (932,387) (84,231) (130,068)

Sales Tax (32,673,120) (44,539,632) (52,418,310) (74,249,472) (97,386,723)

Inland Freight Equalization Margin (8,600,150) (9,725,202) (8,932,956) (13,685,954) (9,199,864)

Net Sales 212,503,650 298,250,039 349,706,326 495,278,533 612,695,589

Less Cost of Goods Sold:

Opening Stock 14,992,097 20,604,757 28,190,089 29,583,511 62,381,523

Purchases 204,369,979 288,628,145 338,840,318 498,052,919 588,023,620

Cost of Product Available for Sale 219,362,076 309,232,902 367,030,407 527,636,430 650,405,143

Closing Stock (20,604,757) (28,190,089) (29,583,510) (62,381,522) (40,719,664)

Cost of Sales 198,757,319 281,042,813 337,446,897 465,254,908 609,685,479

Gross Profit / Loss 13,746,331 17,207,226 12,259,429 30,023,625 3,010,110

Less Operating Expenses:

Transportation Cost:

Cost Incured During The Year 6,766,429 6,409,299 6,860,622 8,219,929 9,482,779

Realized Against IFEM (8,600,150) (9,725,202) (8,932,956) (13,685,954) (9,199,864)

Refinery Share 2,774,028 3,382,251 3,042,484 5,998,784 835,398Adjustments from Other Oil Companies

(627,038) 299,447 (600,822) (194,873) (604,640)

313,269 365,795 369,328 337,886 513,673

Distribution & Marketing Expenses:

Salaries, Wages & Benefits 1,251,558 1,225,467 1,332,317 1,672,477 2,070,788

Rent, Rates & Taxes 221,354 185,600 232,589 274,614 381,626

Repair & Maintenance 330,379 468,563 493,732 548,540 596,548

Insurance 35,945 51,808 65,321 73,907 127,893

Travelling & Office Transport 48,761 58,432 82,632 89,824 105,234

Utilities 107,539 95,108 96,733 104,029 123,989

Sales Promotion & Advertisement 209,065 236,364 241,522 285,152 310,861

Others 153,508 171,291 200,443 229,660 244,014

2,358,109 2,492,633 2,745,289 3,278,203 3,960,953

Administrative Expenses:

Salaries, Wages & Benefits 618,451 631,721 673,542 765,027 801,145

Repairs & Maintenance 26,658 35,831 65,790 68,055 58,988

Insurance 44,957 62,751 66,013 63,485 67,479

Donations 22,122 38,838 30,741 98,162 49,826

Others 148,587 166,448 166,626 152,408 174,355

860,775 935,589 1,002,712 1,147,137 1,151,793

Depreciation & Amortization 984,017 1,082,394 1,140,065 1,166,826 1,194,313

Other Operating Expenses:

Workers' Profits Participation Fund 485,600 573,472 364,816 1,132,598 -

Department of Management Sciences Page 6

Page 7: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Workers' Welfare Fund - 235,790 139,834 436,276 -

Exchange Loss - Net - 110,834 6,498 1,558,947 3,508,030

Provision Against: -

Doubtful Trade Debts 325,000 1,045,600 150,748 158,680 477,345

Disputed Demands for Custom Duty 161,219 215,492 - 37,604 -

Others 84,433 217,453 44,537 25,614 2,385

Miscellaneous 19,620 62,290 48,987 3,250 6,629

1,075,872 2,460,931 755,420 3,352,969 3,994,389

Operating Expenses 5,592,042 7,337,342 6,012,814 9,283,021 10,815,121

8,154,289 9,869,884 6,246,615 20,740,604 (7,805,011)

Add Other Operating Income:

Commission & Handling Services 206,924 138,565 290,963 281,898 384,751

Income from CNG Operations 121,616 203,798 354,709 345,738 385,863

Handling, Services & Other Recoveries 593,028 565,793 602,075 707,824 609,952

Others 264,483 42,694 31,185 61,067 71,100

Other Operating Income 1,186,051 950,850 1,278,932 1,396,527 1,451,666

Operating Profit / Loss 9,340,340 10,820,734 7,525,547 22,137,131 (6,353,345)

Less Finance Cost:

Mark-up on Borrowings 256,990 622,346 891,590 745,502 2,953,427

Banks & Other Charges 113,709 261,807 266,522 622,396 3,278,629

Finance Cost 370,699 884,153 1,158,112 1,367,898 6,232,056

8,969,641 9,936,581 6,367,435 20,769,233 (12,585,401)

Add Other Income:

Share of Profit of Associates 221,808 1,038,939 330,306 294,318 451,850

Dividends - 10,331 13,200 60,906 65,821

Markup & Delayed Payment Charges - 3,745 - - 445,065

Liabilities Written Back - 305,450 184,793 113,129 31,026

Penalties & Other Recoveries - 84,611 100,094 84,231 57,637

Others - 38,654 126,151 55,594 177,137

Other Income 221,808 1,481,730 754,544 608,178 1,228,536

Profit / Loss before Tax 9,191,449 11,418,311 7,121,979 21,377,411 (11,356,865)

Less Taxation:

Current - for The Year 3,236,857 4,099,930 2,483,725 7,392,666 201,536

- for Prior Year 250,534 77,236 (58,802) (62,749) (233,929)

Deferred - for The Year 48,185 (283,556) 7,259 (6,300) (4,625,936)

Taxation 3,535,576 3,893,610 2,432,182 7,323,617 (4,658,329)

Net Profit / Loss 5,655,873 7,524,701 4,689,797 14,053,794 (6,698,536)

Department of Management Sciences Page 7

Page 8: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Balance SheetFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 (Rs. In '000) 2006 (Rs. In '000) 2007 (Rs. In '000) 2008 (Rs. In '000) 2009 (Rs. In '000)

Assets

Current Assets:

Cash & Bank Balances 1,921,936 1,898,894 1,522,276 3,018,640 2,883,118

Short-term Investments 10,081 - - - -

Taxation - Net - - - - 709,627

Other Receivables 10,358,006 14,562,628 15,751,198 15,681,790 12,806,779

Deposits & Short-term Prepayments 726,157 1,287,893 1,583,913 401,433 551,803

Loans & Advances 213,248 275,729 365,974 396,220 418,015

Trade Debts 6,791,078 11,715,868 13,599,966 33,904,728 80,509,830

Stock in Trade 20,583,301 28,168,633 29,562,055 62,360,067 40,698,209

Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools 130,559 125,030 127,891 115,814 112,143

Total Current Assets 40,734,366 58,034,675 62,513,273 115,878,692 138,689,524

Non-Current Assets:

Deferred Tax 124,740 408,296 401,037 407,337 5,033,273

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 105,163 74,662 65,913 79,098 83,655 Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables

769,674 698,146 627,972 477,745 405,780

Long-term Investments 2,317,810 3,278,970 2,990,591 2,701,097 2,153,514

Intangibles 144,647 154,819 126,212 105,502 68,872

Property, Plant & Equipment 8,111,482 7,518,956 8,012,317 7,460,549 6,987,025

Total Non-Current Assets 11,573,516 12,133,849 12,224,042 11,231,328 14,732,119

Total Assets 52,307,882 70,168,524 74,737,315 127,110,020 153,421,643

Liabilities & Equity

Liabilities:

Current Liabilities:

Taxation - Net 1,344,268 1,695,250 69,398 726,703 -

Short-term Borrowings 4,811,605 7,648,919 9,064,781 10,997,908 18,654,526

Accrued Interest / Mark-up 63,924 120,731 131,961 217,928 556,380

Provisions 754,227 777,276 688,512 726,116 688,512

Trade & Other Payables 25,790,181 36,814,402 41,431,075 81,067,565 110,123,702

Total Current Liabilities 32,764,205 47,056,578 51,385,727 93,736,220 130,023,120

Non-Current Liabilities:

Retirement & Other Service Benefits 1,323,688 1,554,893 1,644,063 1,574,148 1,673,020

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 675,170 743,994 768,308 834,598 854,718

Total Non-Current Liabilities 1,998,858 2,298,887 2,412,371 2,408,746 2,527,738

Equity:

Share Capital 1,715,190 1,715,190 1,715,190 1,715,190 1,715,190

Reserves 15,829,629 19,097,869 19,224,027 29,249,864 19,155,595

Total Equity 17,544,819 20,813,059 20,939,217 30,965,054 20,870,785

Total Liabilities & Equity 52,307,882 70,168,524 74,737,315 127,110,020 153,421,643

Department of Management Sciences Page 8

Page 9: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Cash Flow StatementFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 (Rs. In '000) 2006 (Rs. In '000) 2007 (Rs. In '000) 2008 (Rs. In '000) 2009 (Rs. In '000)

Cash Generated from Operating Activities:

Cash Generated from Operations 7,350,990 6,553,775 9,103,698 12,479,055 2,905,661

Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables 142,921 71,528 74,511 149,747 71,965

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments (33,970) 30,501 8,749 (13,185) (4,557)

Long-term Deposits - - - 66,290 20,120

Taxes Paid (1,636,104) (3,826,184) (4,050,775) (6,672,612) (1,403,937)

Finance Costs Paid (337,220) (827,346) (1,146,882) (1,281,931) (5,893,604)

Payment against Provisions (80,258) (184,050) (10,126) - (37,604)

Retirement Benefits Paid (160,700) (184,450) (287,721) (610,949) (486,598)

Net Cash Generated / Used In 5,245,659 1,633,774 3,691,454 4,116,415 (4,828,554)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Purchases of Fixed Assets (1,506,408) (751,350) (1,609,467) (620,293) (694,157)

Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets 12,087 261,863 30,740 57,189 20,167

Dividends Received 274,753 291,143 870,774 390,178 671,101

Proceeds from Liquidation of Subsidiaries - 24,657 -

Net Cash Generated / Used In (1,219,568) (173,687) (707,953) (172,926) (2,889)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Repayment of Long-term Loan (4,753) - - - -

Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits 62,162 68,824 24,314 - - Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances

534,000 216,000 3,210,474 (5,335,878) 3,472,487

Dividends Paid (3,616,669) (4,389,267) (4,800,295) (4,380,252) (2,960,697)

Net Cash Generated / Used In (3,025,260) (4,104,443) (1,565,507) (9,716,130) 511,790

Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for The Year 1,000,831 (2,644,356) 1,417,994 (5,772,641) (4,319,653)

Cash at Beginning of The Year (1,192,500) (191,669) (2,836,025) (1,418,031) (7,190,672)

Cash at End of The Year (191,669) (2,836,025) (1,418,031) (7,190,672) (11,510,325)

Department of Management Sciences Page 9

Page 10: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Vertical Analysis of Income StatementFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Sales Revenue 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Trade Discount & Allowances (0.23%) (0.37%) (0.23%) (0.01%) (0.02%)

Sales Tax (12.85%) (12.59%) (12.72%) (12.73%) (13.54%)

Inland Freight Equalization Margin (3.38%) (2.75%) (2.17%) (2.35%) (1.28%)

Net Sales 83.54% 84.29% 84.88% 84.91% 85.17%

Opening Stock 5.89% 5.82% 6.84% 5.07% 8.67%

Purchases 80.35% 81.57% 82.24% 85.39% 81.74%

Cost of Product Available for Sale 86.24% 87.40% 89.09% 90.46% 90.41%

Closing Stock (8.10%) (7.97%) (7.18%) (10.69%) (5.66%)

Cost of Sales 78.14% 79.43% 81.91% 79.76% 84.75%

Gross Profit / Loss 5.40% 4.86% 2.98% 5.15% 0.42%

Transportation Cost 0.12% 0.10% 0.09% 0.06% 0.07%

Distribution & Marketing Expenses 0.93% 0.70% 0.67% 0.56% 0.55%

Administrative Expenses 0.34% 0.26% 0.24% 0.20% 0.16%

Depreciation & Amortization 0.39% 0.31% 0.28% 0.20% 0.17%

Other Operating Expenses 0.42% 0.70% 0.18% 0.57% 0.56%

Other Operating Income 0.47% 0.27% 0.31% 0.24% 0.20%

Operating Profit / Loss 0.15% 0.25% 0.28% 0.23% 0.87%

Finance Cost 0.15% 0.25% 0.28% 0.23% 0.87%

Other Income 0.09% 0.42% 0.18% 0.10% 0.17%

Profit before Tax / Loss 3.61% 3.23% 1.73% 3.66% (1.58%)

Taxation 1.39% 1.10% 0.59% 1.26% (0.65%)

Net Profit / Loss 2.22% 2.13% 1.14% 2.41% (0.93%)

Interpretation

1. Sales

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Interpretation

In vertical analysis we took sales as base so sales of all the years will 100%.

Department of Management Sciences Page 10

Page 11: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

2. Trade Discount

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.23% 0.37% 0.23% 0.01% 0.02%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.23%, 0.37%, 0.23%, 0.01%, and 0.02% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

3. Sales Tax

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 12.85% 12.59% 12.72% 12.73% 13.54%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 12.85%,12.59 %, 12.72%, 12.73%, and 13.54% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

4. Inland Freight equalization margin

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 3.38% 2.75% 2.17% 2.35% 1.28%

.Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 3.38%, 2.75%, 2.17%, 2.35%, and 1.28% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

5. Net Sales

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 83.54% 84.29% 84.88% 84.91% 85.17%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 83.54%, 84.29%, 84.88%, 84.91%, and 85.17% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 11

Page 12: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

6. Opening Stock

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 5.89% 5.82% 6.84% 5.07% 8.67%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 5.89, 5.82%, 6.84%, 5.07%, and 8.67% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

7. Purchases

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 80.35% 81.57% 82.24% 85.39% 81.74%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 80.35%, 81.57%, 82.24%, 85.39%, and 81.74% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

8. Cost of Products available for Sale

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 86.24% 87.40% 89.09% 90.46% 90.41%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 86.24%, 87.40%, 89.09%, 90.46%, and 90.41% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

9. Closing Stock

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (8.10%) (7.97%) (7.18%) (10.69%) (5.66%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 8.10%, 7.97%, 7.18%, 10.69%, and 5.66% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 12

Page 13: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

10. Gross profit / Loss

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 5.40% 4.86% 2.98% 5.15% 0.42%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 5.40%, 4.86%, 2.98%, 5.15%, and 0.42% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

11. Transportation Cost

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.12% 0.10% 0.09% 0.06% 0.07%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.12%, 0.10%, 0.09%,0.06%, and 0.07% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

12. Distribution and marketing expenses

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.93% 0.70% 0.67% 0.56% 0.55%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.93%, 0.70%, 0.67%,0.56%, and 0.55% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

13. Administrative Expenses

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.34% 0.26% 0.24% 0.20% 0.16%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.34%, 0.26%, 0.24%, 0.20%, and 0.16% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 13

Page 14: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

14. Depreciation & Amortization

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.39% 0.31% 0.28% 0.20% 0.17%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.39%, 0.31%, 0.28%, 0.20%, and 0.17% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

15. Other Operating Expenses

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.42% 0.70% 0.18% 0.57% 0.56%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.42%, 0.70%, 0.18%, 0.57%, and 0.56% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

16. Other Operating Income

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.47% 0.27% 0.31% 0.24% 0.20%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.47%, 0.27%, 0.31%, 0.24%, and 0.20% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

17. Other Operating Profit/ Loss

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.15% 0.25% 0.28% 0.23% 0.87%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.15%, 0.25%, 0.28%, 0.23%, and 0.87% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 14

Page 15: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

18. Finance Cost

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.15% 0.25% 0.28% 0.23% 0.87%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.15%, 0.25%, 0.28%, 0.23%, and 0.87% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

19. Other Income

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.09% 0.42% 0.18% 0.10% 0.17%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 0.09%, 0.42%, 0.18%, 0.10%, and 0.17% of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

20. Profit before Tax

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 3.61% 3.23% 1.73% 3.66% (1.58%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 3.61%, 3.23%, 1.73%, 3.66%, and (1.58%) of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

21. Taxation

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 1.39% 1.10% 0.59% 1.26% (0.65%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 1.39%, 1.10%, 0.59%, 1.26%, and (0.65%) of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 15

Page 16: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

22. Net Profit / Loss

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 2.22% 2.13% 1.14% 2.41% (0.93%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cost of sales under vertical analysis taking sales as base is covering almost 2.22%, 2.13%, 1.14%, 2.41%, and (0.93%) of respective sales in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the cost of sales is increasing.

Horizontal Analysis of Income StatementFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Sales Revenue 100% 139.11% 161.97% 229.32% 282.83%

Trade Discount & Allowances 100% 224.97% 159.09% 14.37% 22.19%

Sales Tax 100% 136.32% 160.43% 227.25% 298.06%

Inland Freight Equalization Margin 100% 113.08% 103.87% 159.14% 106.97%

Net Sales 100% 140.35% 164.56% 233.07% 288.32%

Opening Stock 100% 137.44% 188.03% 197.33% 416.10%

Purchases 100% 141.23% 165.80% 243.70% 287.73%

Cost of Product Available for Sale 100% 140.97% 167.32% 240.53% 296.50%

Closing Stock 100% 136.81% 143.58% 302.75% 197.62%

Cost of Sales 100% 141.40% 169.78% 234.08% 306.75%

Gross Profit / Loss 100% 125.18% 89.18% 218.41% 21.90%

Transportation Cost 100% 116.77% 117.89% 107.86% 163.97%

Distribution & Marketing Expenses 100% 105.70% 116.42% 139.02% 167.97%

Administrative Expenses 100% 108.69% 116.49% 133.27% 133.81%

Depreciation & Amortization 100% 110.00% 115.86% 118.58% 121.37%

Other Operating Expenses 100% 228.74% 70.21% 311.65% 371.27%

Other Operating Income 100% 80.17% 107.83% 117.75% 122.39%

Operating Profit / Loss 100% 115.85% 80.57% 237.01% (68.02%)

Finance Cost 100% 238.51% 312.41% 369.01% 1681.16%

Other Income 100% 668.02% 340.18% 274.19% 553.87%

Profit before Tax / Loss 100% 124.23% 77.48% 232.58% (123.56%)

Taxation 100% 110.13% 68.79% 207.14% (131.76%)

Net Profit / Loss 100% 133.04% 82.92% 248.48% (118.44%)

Department of Management Sciences Page 16

Page 17: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Interpretation

1. Sales

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 139.11% 161.97% 229.32% 282.83%

Interpretation

Since the sales of Pakistan State Oil Limited have increased as compared to base Year (2005) significantly we conclude that PSO has improved its sale to more than 182% in 5 years.

2. Trade Discount

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 224.97% 159.09% 14.37% 22.19%

Interpretation

The trade discount of PSO shows an increase in year 2006. Also in 2007 its value is showing increase as compared to base year. After 2007 decreased significantly and same is for the year 2009. Hence this trend showed that PSO has decreased its trade discounts.

3. Sales Tax

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 136.33% 160.43% 227.25% 298.06%

Interpretation

From the above values it is obvious that sales tax is continuously increasing from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year. It also shows that the sales volume is increasing each year as compared to base ear.

4. Inland Freight equalization margin

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 113.08% 103.87% 159.14% 106.978%

Interpretation

From the above values we can see an increasing and decreasing trend of freight margin when compared to the base year. It shows a significant increase in year 2008 as compared to base year.

Department of Management Sciences Page 17

Page 18: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

5. Net Sales

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 140.35% 164.56% 233.07% 288.32%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of net sales are showing a continuous increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the net sales of PSO has been increasing continuously.

6. Opening Stock

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 137.44% 188.03% 197.33% 416.10%

Interpretation

The above values show an increasing trend in the opening stock of the PSO as compared to the base year, even in the year 2009 it shows a significant increase i.e. 416%.

7. Purchases

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 141.23% 165.80% 243.70% 287.73%

Interpretation

Since the above values show an increasing trend as compared to the base year so we can say that the Purchases of the company have increased more than double from the base year till 2009.

8. Cost of Products Sold

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 140.97% 167.32% 240.53% 296.50%

Interpretation

The above calculated values are showing an increase in comparison to the base year but this increase is not negative as the volume of production is also increasing that caused increase in cost of production hence we conclude that it is a positive sign as sales are also increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 18

Page 19: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

9. Closing Stock

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 136.81% 143.58% 302.75% 197.62%

Interpretation

The values of closing stock are increasing as compared to the base year from 2006 to 2009.

10. Gross profit / Loss

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 125.18% 89.18% 218.41% 21.90%

Interpretation

The calculated values of the gross profit show a see-saw model. It increased in next year i.e. 2006 when compared to base year then decreased in 2007. Again it increased sufficiently in 2008 and then decreased again in 2009.

11. Transportation Cost

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 116.77% 117.89% 107.86% 163.97%

Interpretation

From the above calculated values the transportation cost is showing a mixed stream of increasing and decreasing behavior. In first two subsequent years it increased up to 17% and then it decreased in 2008. Again it shows a significant increase in 2009.

12. Distribution and Marketing Expenses

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 105.70% 116.42% 139.02% 167.97%

Interpretation

The above values shows a continuously increase in distribution and marketing expenses in years 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year 2005.

Department of Management Sciences Page 19

Page 20: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

13. Administrative Expenses

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 108.69% 116.49% 133.27% 133.81%

Interpretation

The calculated values of administrative expenses are continuously increasing from years 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year 2005.

14. Depreciation & Amortization

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 110.00% 115.86% 118.58% 121.37%

Interpretation

Depreciation and amortization expenses are continuously increasing as compared to the base year but this is not a significant increase.

15. Other Operating Expenses

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 228.74% 70.21% 311.65% 371.27%

Interpretation

Since the calculated value shows a continuous increase in the operating expenses of PSO limited as compared to the base year yet there is a significant decrease in the year 2007 but again in subsequent years this value increased significantly.

16. Other Operating Income

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 80.17% 107.83% 117.75% 122.39%

Interpretation

The above values of operating income when compared with the base year decreased in first year but it increased continuously in the subsequent years.

Department of Management Sciences Page 20

Page 21: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

17. Other Operating Profit/ Loss

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 115.85% 80.57% 237.01% (68.02%)

Interpretation

Since the computed values of operating profit are does not show a continuous trend so we can say that the profit increased in two non-subsequent year i.e. 2006 and 2008 but it decreased in 2007 as compared to base year. In 2009 it shows a significant loss.

18. Finance Cost

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 238.51% 312.41% 369.01% 1681.16%

Interpretation

The finance cost of the PSO limited shows a significant increase over the years when compared to the base year. It means that the finance cost of the company in increasing continuously.

19. Other Income

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 668.02% 340.18% 274.19% 553.87%

Interpretation

From the above computed values we can see that the other income of the company increased in 2006 very significantly but in next subsequent years it increased with a decreased rate.

20. Profit before Tax

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 124.23% 77.48% 232.58% (123.56%)

Interpretation

The calculated values of profit before tax show an increase as compared to base year in the first year and then a decrease in the next year. However it shows significant positive change in the next year as compared to the base year. Yet in the year 2009 it showed a very significant decrease that is signifies a tax bracket.

Department of Management Sciences Page 21

Page 22: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

21. Taxation

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 110.13% 68.79% 207.14% (131.76%)

Interpretation

The above computed values of taxation are showing increase in 2006 as compared to base year and decrease in the next year 2007. Again the value of tax increases in 2008. However the firm got tax bracket due to operating loss in the year 2009.

22. Net Profit / Loss

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 133.04% 82.92% 248.48% (118.44%)

Interpretation

The computed values of net profits here also show the above zigzag pattern as compared to the base year. However in the last year i.e. 2009 the company shows a significant loss.

Department of Management Sciences Page 22

Page 23: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Vertical Analysis of Balance SheetFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Assets

Current Assets:

Cash & Bank Balances 3.67% 2.71% 2.04% 2.37% 1.88%

Short-term Investments 0.02% - - - -

Taxation - Net - - - - 0.46%

Other Receivables 19.80% 20.75% 21.08% 12.34% 8.35%

Deposits & Short-term Prepayments 1.39% 1.84% 2.12% 0.32% 0.36%

Loans & Advances 0.41% 0.39% 0.49% 0.31% 0.27%

Trade Debts 12.98% 16.70% 18.20% 26.67% 52.48%

Stock in Trade 39.35% 40.14% 39.55% 49.06% 26.53%

Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools 0.25% 0.18% 0.17% 0.09% 0.07%

Total Current Assets 77.87% 82.71% 83.64% 91.16% 90.40%

Non-Current Assets:

Deferred Tax 0.24% 0.58% 0.54% 0.32% 3.28%

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 0.20% 0.11% 0.09% 0.06% 0.05%

Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables 1.47% 0.99% 0.84% 0.38% 0.26%

Long-term Investments 4.43% 4.67% 4.00% 2.13% 1.40%

Intangibles 0.28% 0.22% 0.17% 0.08% 0.04%

Property, Plant & Equipment 15.51% 10.72% 10.72% 5.87% 4.55%

Total Non-Current Assets 22.13% 17.29% 16.36% 8.84% 9.60%

Total Assets 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Liabilities & Equity

Liabilities:

Current Liabilities:

Taxation - Net 2.57% 2.42% 0.09% 0.57% -

Short-term Borrowings 9.20% 10.90% 12.13% 8.65% 12.16%

Accrued Interest / Mark-up 0.12% 0.17% 0.18% 0.17% 0.36%

Provisions 1.44% 1.11% 0.92% 0.57% 0.45%

Trade & Other Payables 49.30% 52.47% 55.44% 63.78% 71.78%

Total Current Liabilities 62.64% 67.06% 68.76% 73.74% 84.75%

Non-Current Liabilities:

Retirement & Other Service Benefits 2.53% 2.22% 2.20% 1.24% 1.09%

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 1.29% 1.06% 1.03% 0.66% 0.56%

Total Non-Current Liabilities 3.82% 3.28% 3.23% 1.90% 1.65%

Equity:

Share Capital 3.28% 2.44% 2.29% 1.35% 1.12%

Reserves 30.26% 27.22% 25.72% 23.01% 12.49%

Total Equity 33.54% 29.66% 28.02% 24.36% 13.60%

Total Liabilities & Equity 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Department of Management Sciences Page 23

Page 24: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Interpretation

1. Cash & Bank Balances

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 3.67% 2.71% 2.04% 2.37% 1.88%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of cash & bank balances under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 3.67%, 2.71%, 2.04%, 2.37%, and 1.88% of total volume of balance sheet in the consecutive last five years. The overall tendency of the cash & bank balances is decreasing.

2. Short-term Investments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.02% - - - -

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Short-term Investments under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.02% of total volume of balance sheet in the year 2005. In the coming years till 2009 company did not invest in short-term assets.

3. Taxation - Net

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage - - - - 0.46%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Taxation - Net under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.46% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years.

4. Other Receivables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 19.80% 20.75% 21.08% 12.34% 8.35%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Other Receivables under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 19.80%, 20.75%, 21.08%, 12.34%, and 8.35% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Other Receivables is increasing in first three years than decreasing in last two years.

Department of Management Sciences Page 24

Page 25: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

5. Deposits & Short-term Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 1.39% 1.84% 2.12% 0.32% 0.36%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Deposits & Short-term Prepayments under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 1.39%, 1.84%, 2.12%, 0.32%, and 0.36% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Deposits & Short-term Prepayments is increasing in first three years than decreasing in last two years.

6. Loans & Advances

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.41% 0.39% 0.49% 0.31% 0.27%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Loans & Advances under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.41%, 0.39%, 0.49%, 0.31%, and 0.27% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Loans & Advances is decreasing.

7. Trade Debts

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 12.98% 16.70% 18.20% 26.67% 52.48%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Trade Debts under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 12.98%, 16.70%, 18.20%, 26.67%, and 52.48% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Trade Debts is increasing.

8. Stock in Trade

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 39.35% 40.14% 39.55% 49.06% 26.53%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Stock in Trade under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 39.35%, 40.14%, 39.55%, 49.06%, and 26.53% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Stock in Trade is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 25

Page 26: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

9. Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.25% 0.18% 0.17% 0.09% 0.07%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.25%, 0.18%, 0.17%, 0.09%, and 0.07% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools is decreasing.

10. Total Current Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 77.87% 82.71% 83.64% 91.16% 90.40%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Total Current Assets under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 77.87%, 82.71%, 83.64%, 91.16%, and 90.40% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of

the Total Current Assets is increasing.

11. Deferred Tax

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.24% 0.58% 0.54% 0.32% 3.28%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Deferred Tax under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.24%, 0.58%, 0.54%, 0.32%, and 3.28% of total volume of

balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Deferred Tax is increasing.

12. Long-term Deposits & Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.20% 0.11% 0.09% 0.06% 0.05%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Long-term Deposits & Prepayments under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.20%, 0.11%, 0.09%, 0.06%, and 0.05% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency

of the Long-term Deposits & Prepayments is decreasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 26

Page 27: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

13. Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 1.47% 0.99% 0.84% 0.38% 0.26%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.23%, 0.37%, 0.23%, 0.01%, and 0.02% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The

overall tendency of the Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables is increasing.

14. Long-term Investments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 4.43% 4.67% 4.00% 2.13% 1.40%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Long-term Investments under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 4.43%, 4.67%, 4.00%, 2.13%, and 1.40% of total

volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Long-term Investments is decreasing.

15. Intangibles

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.28% 0.22% 0.17% 0.08% 0.04%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Intangibles under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.28%, 0.22%, 0.17%, 0.08%, and 0.04% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Intangibles is decreasing.

16. Property, Plant & Equipment

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 15.51% 10.72% 10.72% 5.87% 4.55%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Property, Plant & Equipment under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 15.51%, 10.72%, 10.72%, 5.87%, and 4.55% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Property, Plant & Equipment is decreasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 27

Page 28: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

17. Total Non-Current Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 22.13% 17.29% 16.36% 8.84% 9.60%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Total Non-Current Assets under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 22.13%, 17.29%, 16.36%, 8.84%, and 9.60% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Total Non-Current Assets is decreasing.

18. Total Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Interpretation

We take total assets as base in this vertical analysis so total assets are 100% in every year.

19. Taxation - Net

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 2.57% 2.42% 0.09% 0.57% -

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Taxation - Net under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 2.57%, 2.42%, 0.09% and 0.57% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Taxation - Net is decreasing.

20. Short-term Borrowings

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 9.20% 10.90% 12.13% 8.65% 12.16%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Short-term Borrowings under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 9.20%, 10.90%, 12.13%, 8.65%, and 12.16% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Short-term Borrowings is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 28

Page 29: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

21. Accrued Interest / Mark-up

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 0.12% 0.17% 0.18% 0.17% 0.36%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of accrued Interest / Mark-up under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 0.12%, 0.17%, 0.18%, 0.17%, and 0.36% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the accrued Interest / Mark-up is increasing.

22. Provisions

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 1.44% 1.11% 0.92% 0.57% 0.45%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Provisions under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 1.44%, 1.11%, 0.92%, 0.57%, and 0.45% of total volume of

balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Provisions is decreasing.

23. Trade & Other Payables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 49.30% 52.47% 55.44% 63.78% 71.78%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Trade & Other Payables under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 49.30%, 52.47%, 55.44%, 63.78% and 71.78% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of

the Trade & Other Payables is increasing.

24. Total Current Liabilities

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 62.64% 67.06% 68.76% 73.74% 84.75%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Total Current Liabilities under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 62.64%, 67.06%, 68.76%, 73.74%, and 84.75% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Total Current Liabilities is increasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 29

Page 30: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

25. Retirement & Other Service Benefits

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 2.53% 2.22% 2.20% 1.24% 1.09%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Retirement & Other Service Benefits under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 2.53%, 2.22%, 2.20%, 1.24%, and 1.09% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Retirement & Other Service Benefits is decreasing.

26. Long-term Deposits & Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 1.29% 1.06% 1.03% 0.66% 0.56%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Long-term Deposits & Prepayments under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 1.29%, 1.06%, 1.03%, 0.66%, and 0.56% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Long-term Deposits & Prepayments is decreasing.

27. Total Non-Current Liabilities

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 3.82% 3.28% 3.23% 1.90% 1.65%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Total Non-Current Liabilities under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 3.82%, 3.28%, 3.23%, 1.90%, and 1.65% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Total Non-Current Liabilities is decreasing.

28. Share Capital

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 3.28% 2.44% 2.29% 1.35% 1.12%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Share Capital under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 3.28%, 2.44%, 2.29%, 1.35%, and 1.12% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Share Capital is decreasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 30

Page 31: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

29. Reserves

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 30.26% 27.22% 25.72% 23.01% 12.49%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Reserves under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 30.26%, 27.22%, 25.72%, 23.01%, and 12.49% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Reserves is decreasing.

30. Total Equity

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 33.54% 29.66% 28.02% 24.36% 13.60%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Total Equity under vertical analysis taking total assets as base is covering almost 33.54%, 29.66%, 28.02%, 24.36%, and 13.60% of total volume of balance sheet in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Total Equity is decreasing.

31. Total Liabilities & Equity

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Interpretation

As we take total assets as base for this analysis so total liabilities & equity is also 100% in every year.

Department of Management Sciences Page 31

Page 32: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Horizontal Analysis of Balance SheetFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Assets

Current Assets:

Cash & Bank Balances 100% 98.80% 79.21% 157.06% 150.01%

Short-term Investments 100% - - - -

Taxation - Net - - - - 100%

Other Receivables 100% 140.59% 152.07% 151.40% 123.64%

Deposits & Short-term Prepayments 100% 177.36% 218.12% 55.28% 75.99%

Loans & Advances 100% 129.30% 171.62% 185.80% 196.02%

Trade Debts 100% 172.52% 200.26% 499.25% 1185.52%

Stock in Trade 100% 136.85% 143.62% 302.96% 197.72%

Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools 100% 95.77% 97.96% 88.71% 85.89%

Total Current Assets 100% 142.47% 153.47% 284.47% 340.47%

Non-Current Assets:

Deferred Tax 100% 327.32% 321.50% 326.55% 4035.01%

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 100% 71.00% 62.68% 75.21% 79.55%

Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables 100% 90.71% 81.59% 62.07% 52.72%

Long-term Investments 100% 141.47% 129.03% 116.54% 92.91%

Intangibles 100% 107.03% 87.26% 72.94% 47.61%

Property, Plant & Equipment 100% 92.70% 98.78% 91.98% 86.14%

Total Non-Current Assets 100% 104.84% 105.62% 97.04% 127.29%

Total Assets 100% 134.15% 142.88% 243.00% 293.31%

Liabilities & Equity

Liabilities:

Current Liabilities:

Taxation - Net 100% 126.11% 5.16% 54.06% 0.00%

Short-term Borrowings 100% 158.97% 188.39% 228.57% 387.70%

Accrued Interest / Mark-up 100% 188.87% 206.43% 340.92% 870.38%

Provisions 100% 103.06% 91.29% 96.27% 91.29%

Trade & Other Payables 100% 142.75% 160.65% 314.33% 427.00%

Total Current Liabilities 100% 143.62% 156.83% 286.09% 396.85%

Non-Current Liabilities:

Retirement & Other Service Benefits 100% 117.47% 124.20% 118.92% 126.39%

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 100% 110.19% 113.79% 123.61% 126.59%

Total Non-Current Liabilities 100% 115.01% 120.69% 120.51% 126.46%

Equity:

Share Capital 100% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Reserves 100% 120.65% 121.44% 184.78% 121.01%

Total Equity 100% 118.63% 119.35% 176.49% 118.96%

Total Liabilities & Equity 100% 134.15% 142.88% 243.00% 293.31%

Department of Management Sciences Page 32

Page 33: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Interpretation

1. Cash & Bank Balances

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 98.80% 79.21% 157.06% 150.01%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Cash & Bank Balances are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Cash & Bank Balances of PSO has been increasing continuously.

2. Short-term Investments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% - - - -

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Short-term Investments is showing that company made short term investment only in 2005 from last five years.

3. Taxation - Net

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage - - - - 100.00%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Taxation – Net is showing that the company has only earned the benefit of taxation in 2009.

4. Other Receivables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 140.59% 152.07% 151.40% 123.64%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Other Receivables are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Other Receivables of PSO has been increasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 33

Page 34: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

5. Deposits & Short-term Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 177.36% 218.12% 55.28% 75.99%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Deposits & Short-term Prepayments are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Deposits & Short-term Prepayments of PSO has been increasing continuously.

6. Loans & Advances

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 129.30% 171.62% 185.80% 196.02%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Loans & Advances are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Loans & Advances of PSO has been increasing continuously.

7. Trade Debts

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 172.52% 200.26% 499.25% 1185.52%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Trade Debts are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Trade Debts of PSO has been increasing continuously.

8. Stock in Trade

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 136.85% 143.62% 302.96% 197.72%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Stock in Trade are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Stock in Trade of PSO has been increasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 34

Page 35: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

9. Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 95.77% 97.96% 88.71% 85.89%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Stores, Spare Parts & Loose Tools are showing a decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Stores; Spare Parts & Loose Tools of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

10. Total Current Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 142.47% 153.47% 284.47% 340.47%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Current Assets are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Current Assets of PSO has been increasing continuously.

11. Deferred Tax

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 327.32% 321.50% 326.55% 4035.01%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Deferred Tax are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Deferred Tax of PSO has been increasing continuously.

12. Long-term Deposits & Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 71.00% 62.68% 75.21% 79.55%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Long-term Deposits & Prepayments are showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Long-term Deposits & Prepayments of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 35

Page 36: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

13. Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 90.71% 81.59% 62.07% 52.72%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables are showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

14. Long-term Investments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 141.47% 129.03% 116.54% 92.91%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Long-term Investments are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2008 and decrease in 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Long-term Investments of PSO has been increasing continuously. However Long-term Investments decreased in 2009.

15. Intangibles

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 107.03% 87.26% 72.94% 47.61%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Intangibles are showing a significant decrease from 2007 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Intangibles of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

16. Property, Plant & Equipment

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 92.70% 98.78% 91.98% 86.14%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Property, Plant & Equipment are showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Property, Plant & Equipment of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 36

Page 37: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

17. Total Non-Current Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 104.84% 105.62% 97.04% 127.29%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Non-Current Assets are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Non-Current Assets of PSO has been increasing continuously except in 2008.

18. Total Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 134.15% 142.88% 243.00% 293.31%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Assets are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Assets of PSO has been increasing continuously.

19. Taxation - Net

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 126.11% 5.16% 54.06% 0.00%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Taxation - Net are showing a significant decrease from 2007 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Taxation - Net of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

20. Short-term Borrowings

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 158.97% 188.39% 228.57% 387.70%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Short-term Borrowings are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Short-term Borrowings of PSO has been increasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 37

Page 38: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

21. Accrued Interest / Mark-up

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 188.87% 206.43% 340.92% 870.38%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Accrued Interest / Mark-up are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Accrued Interest / Mark-up of PSO has been increasing continuously.

22. Provisions

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 103.06% 91.29% 96.27% 91.29%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Provisions are showing a significant decrease from 2007 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Provisions of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

23. Trade & Other Payables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 142.75% 160.65% 314.33% 427.00%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Trade & Other Payables are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Trade & Other Payables of PSO has been increasing continuously.

24. Total Current Liabilities

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 143.62% 156.83% 286.09% 396.85%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Current Liabilities are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Current Liabilities of PSO has been increasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 38

Page 39: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

25. Retirement & Other Service Benefits

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 117.47% 124.20% 118.92% 126.39%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Retirement & Other Service Benefits are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Retirement & Other Service Benefits of PSO has been increasing continuously.

26. Long-term Deposits & Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 110.19% 113.79% 123.61% 126.59%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Long-term Deposits & Prepayments are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Long-term Deposits & Prepayments of PSO has been increasing continuously.

27. Total Non-Current Liabilities

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 115.01% 120.69% 120.51% 126.46%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Non-Current Liabilities are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Non-Current Liabilities of PSO has been increasing continuously.

28. Share Capital

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Interpretation

The computed values of Share Capital are showing that the capital of the company is remained same over the years.

Department of Management Sciences Page 39

Page 40: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

29. Reserves

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 120.65% 121.44% 184.78% 121.01%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Reserves are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Reserves of PSO has been increasing continuously.

30. Total Equity

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 118.63% 119.35% 176.49% 118.96%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Equity are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Equity of PSO has been increasing continuously.

31. Total Liabilities & Equity

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100.00% 134.15% 142.88% 243.00% 293.31%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Liabilities & Equity are showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Liabilities & Equity of PSO has been increasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 40

Page 41: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Vertical Analysis of Cash Flow StatementFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Cash Generated from Operating Activities:

Cash Generated from Operations (3,835.3%) (231.09%) (642%) (173.55%) (25.24%)

Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables (74.57%) (2.52%) (5.25%) (2.08%) (0.63%)

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 17.72% (1.08%) (0.62%) - -

Long-term Deposits - - - (0.92%) (0.17%)

Taxes Paid 853.61% 134.91% 285.66% 92.80% 12.20%

Finance Costs Paid 175.94% 29.17% 80.88% 17.83% 51.20%

Payment against Provisions 41.87% 6.49% 0.71% 0.00% 0.33%

Retirement Benefits Paid 83.84% 6.50% 20.29% 8.50% 4.23%

Net Cash Generated / Used In Operations (2,736.8%) (57.61%) (260.3%) (57.25%) 41.95%

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Purchases of Fixed Assets 785.94% 26.49% 113.50% 8.63% 6.03%

Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets (6.31%) (9.23%) (2.17%) (0.80%) (0.18%)

Dividends Received (143.35%) (10.27%) (61.41%) (5.43%) (5.83%)

Proceeds from Liquidation of Subsidiaries - (0.87%) - - -

Net Cash Generated / Used In Investments 636.29% 6.12% 49.93% 2.40% 0.03%

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Repayment of Long-term Loan 2.48% - - - -

Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits (32.43%) (2.43%) (1.71%) - - Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances

(278.61%) (7.62%) (226.40%) 74.21% (30.17%)

Dividends Paid 1886.93% 154.77% 338.52% 60.92% 25.72%

Net Cash Generated / Used In Financing 1578.38% 144.73% 110.40% 135.12% (4.45%)

Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for The Year (522.17%) 93.24% (100%) 80.28% 37.53%

Cash at Beginning of The Year 622.17% 6.76% 200% 19.72% 62.47%

Cash at End of The Year 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Interpretation

1. Cash Generated from Operations

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (3,835.25%) (231.09%) (642.00%) (173.55%) (25.24%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Cash Generated from Operations under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 3,835.25%, 231.09%, 642.00%, 173.55%, and 25.24% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. It is showing that Company using more cash than it generated from operations.

Department of Management Sciences Page 41

Page 42: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

2. Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (74.57%) (2.52%) (5.25%) (2.08%) (0.63%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 74.57%, 2.52%, 5.25%, 2.08%, and 0.63% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables is decreasing.

3. Long-term Deposits & Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 17.72% (1.08%) (0.62%) - -

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Long-term Deposits & Prepayments under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 17.72%, 1.08%, and 0.62% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Long-term Deposits & Prepayments is decreasing.

4. Long-term Deposits

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage - - - (0.92%) (0.17%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Long-term Deposits under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base company made long term deposits at 0.92% and 0.17% of respective Cash at End of The Year only in 2008 and 2009.

5. Taxes Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 853.61% 134.91% 285.66% 92.80% 12.20%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Taxes Paid under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 853.61%, 134.91%, 285.66%, 92.80%, and 12.20% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Taxes Paid is decreasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 42

Page 43: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

6. Finance Costs Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 175.94% 29.17% 80.88% 17.83% 51.20%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Finance Costs Paid under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base almost 175.94%, 29.17%, 80.88%, 17.83%, and 51.20% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Finance Costs Paid is decreasing.

7. Payment against Provisions

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 41.87% 6.49% 0.71% 0.00% 0.33%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Payment against Provisions under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 41.87%, 6.49%, 0.71%, 0.00%, and 0.33% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Payment against Provisions is decreasing.

8. Retirement Benefits Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 83.84% 6.50% 20.29% 8.50% 4.23%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Retirement Benefits Paid under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 83.84%, 6.50%, 20.29%, 8.50%, and 4.23% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Retirement Benefits Paid is decreasing.

9. Net Cash Generated / Used In

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (2,736.83%) (57.61%) (260.32%) (57.25%) 41.95%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Net Cash Generated / Used In under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 2,736.83%, 57.61%, 260.32%, 57.25%, and 41.95% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Net Cash Generated / Used In is decreasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 43

Page 44: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

10. Purchases of Fixed Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 785.94% 26.49% 113.50% 8.63% 6.03%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Purchases of Fixed Assets under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 785.94%, 26.49%, 113.50%, 8.63%, and 6.03% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Purchases of Fixed Assets is decreasing.

11. Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (6.31%) (9.23%) (2.17%) (0.80%) (0.18%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 6.31%, 9.23%, 2.17%, 0.80%, and 0.18% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets is decreasing.

12. Dividends Received

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (143.35%) (10.27%) (61.41%) (5.43%) (5.83%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Dividends Received under vertical analysis taking Cash at the End of The Year as base is covering almost 143.35%, 10.27%, 61.41%, 5.43%, and 5.83% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Dividends Received is decreasing.

13. Proceeds from Liquidation of Subsidiaries

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage - (0.87%) - - -

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Proceeds from Liquidation of Subsidiaries under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering 0.87% of respective Cash at End of The Year only in 2006.

Department of Management Sciences Page 44

Page 45: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

14. Net Cash Generated / Used In

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 636.29% 6.12% 49.93% 2.40% 0.03%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Net Cash Generated / Used In under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 636.29%, 6.12%, 49.93%, 2.40%, and 0.03% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Net Cash Generated / Used In is decreasing.

15. Repayment of Long-term Loan

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 2.48% - - - -

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Repayment of Long-term Loan under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is repay 0.02% of respective Cash at End of The Year only in 2005.

16. Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (32.43%) (2.43%) (1.71%) - -

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 32.43%, 2.43% and 1.71% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the years from 2005 to 2007. The overall tendency of the Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits is decreasing. 17. Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (278.61%) (7.62%) (226.40%) 74.21% (30.17%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 278.61%, 7.62%, 226.40%, 74.21%, and 30.17% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances is decreasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 45

Page 46: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

18. Dividends Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 1886.93% 154.77% 338.52% 60.92% 25.72%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Dividends Paid under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 1886.93%, 154.77%, 338.52%, 60.92%, and 25.72% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Dividends Paid is decreasing.

19. Net Cash Generated / Used In

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 1578.38% 144.73% 110.40% 135.12% (4.45%)

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Net Cash Generated / Used In under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 1578.38%, 144.73%, 110.40%, 135.12%, and 4.45% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Net Cash Generated / Used In is decreasing.

20. Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for the Year

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage (522.17%) 93.24% (100%) 80.28% 37.53%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for the Year under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 522.17%, 93.24%, 100%, 80.28%, and 37.53% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for the Year is decreasing.

Department of Management Sciences Page 46

Page 47: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

21. Cash at Beginning of the Year

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 622.17% 6.76% 200% 19.72% 62.47%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Cash at Beginning of the Year under vertical analysis taking Cash at End of The Year as base is covering almost 622.17%, 6.76%, 200%, 19.72%, and 62.47% of respective Cash at End of The Year in the last five consecutive years. The overall tendency of the Cash at Beginning of the Year is decreasing.

22. Cash at End of the Year

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Cash at End of the Year under vertical analysis is taking as base year.

Department of Management Sciences Page 47

Page 48: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Horizontal Analysis of Cash Flow StatementFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Cash Generated from Operating Activities:

Cash Generated from Operations 100% 89.15% 123.84% 169.76% 39.53%

Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables 100% 50.05% 52.13% 104.78% 50.35%

Long-term Deposits & Prepayments 100% (89.79%) (25.76%) 38.81% 13.41%

Long-term Deposits - - - 100% 30%

Taxes Paid 100% 233.86% 247.59% 407.84% 85.81%

Finance Costs Paid 100% 245.34% 340.10% 380.15% 1747.70%

Payment against Provisions 100% 229.32% 12.62% - 46.85%

Retirement Benefits Paid 100% 114.78% 179.04% 380.18% 302.80%

Net Cash Generated / Used In 100% 31.15% 70.37% 78.47% (92.05%)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Purchases of Fixed Assets 100% 49.88% 106.84% 41.18% 46.08%

Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets 100% 2166.48% 254.32% 473.14% 166.85%

Dividends Received 100% 105.97% 316.93% 142.01% 244.26%

Proceeds from Liquidation of Subsidiaries - 100% - - -

Net Cash Generated / Used In 100% 14.24% 58.05% 14.18% 0.24%

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Repayment of Long-term Loan 100% - - - -

Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits 100% 110.72% 39.11% - - Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances

100% 40.45% 601.21% (999.23%) 650.28%

Dividends Paid 100% 121.36% 132.73% 121.11% 81.86%

Net Cash Generated / Used In 100% 135.67% 51.75% 321.17% (16.92%)

Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for The Year 100% (264.22%) 141.68% (576.78%) (431.61%)

Cash at Beginning of The Year 100% 16.07% 237.82% 118.91% 602.99%

Cash at End of The Year 100% 1479.65% 739.83% 3751.61% 6005.31%

Interpretation

1. Cash Generated from Operations

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 89.15% 123.84% 169.76% 39.53%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of are Cash Generated from Operations showing a significant increase in 2007 and 2008 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Cash Generated from Operations of PSO has been increasing continuously. However there is a significant decrease in 2009.

Department of Management Sciences Page 48

Page 49: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

2. Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 50.05% 52.13% 104.78% 50.35%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Long-term Loans, Advances & Receivables of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

3. Long-term Deposits & Prepayments

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% (89.79%) (25.76%) 38.81% 13.41%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Long-term Deposits & Prepayments showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Long-term Deposits & Prepayments of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

4. Long-term Deposits

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage - - - 100% 30%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Long-term Deposits are showing that company has made investment in long term deposits only in last two years from last consecutive five years.

5. Taxes Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 233.86% 247.59% 407.84% 85.81%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Taxes Paid showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2008 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Taxes Paid of PSO has been increasing continuously. However there is a significant decrease in 2009.

Department of Management Sciences Page 49

Page 50: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

6. Finance Costs Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 245.34% 340.10% 380.15% 1747.70%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Finance Costs Paid showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Finance Costs Paid of PSO has been increasing continuously.

7. Payment against Provisions

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 229.32% 12.62% - 46.85%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Payment against Provisions showing a significant decrease from 2007 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Payment against Provisions of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

8. Retirement Benefits Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 114.78% 179.04% 380.18% 302.80%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Retirement Benefits Paid showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Retirement Benefits Paid of PSO has been increasing continuously.

9. Net Cash Generated / Used In

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 31.15% 70.37% 78.47% (92.05%)

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Net Cash Generated / Used In showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Net Cash Generated / Used In of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 50

Page 51: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

10. Purchases of Fixed Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 49.88% 106.84% 41.18% 46.08%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Purchases of Fixed Assets showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Purchases of Fixed Assets of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

11. Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 2166.48% 254.32% 473.14% 166.85%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Proceeds from Disposal of Operating Assets of PSO has been increasing continuously.

12. Dividends Received

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 105.97% 316.93% 142.01% 244.26%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Dividends Received showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Dividends Received of PSO has been increasing continuously.

13. Proceeds from Liquidation of Subsidiaries

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage - 100% - - -

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Proceeds from Liquidation is showing that company made investment in Proceeds from Liquidation only in 2006, from 2005-09.

Department of Management Sciences Page 51

Page 52: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

14. Net Cash Generated / Used In

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 14.24% 58.05% 14.18% 0.24%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Net Cash Generated / Used In showing a significant decrease from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Net Cash Generated / Used in of PSO has been decreasing continuously.

15. Repayment of Long-term Loan

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% - - - -

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Repayment of Long-term Loan showing that company made repayment of long term loan only in base year.

16. Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 110.72% 39.11% - -

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Proceeds from / Repayment of Long-term Deposits showing a significant increase 2006 as compared to base year. However there is a significant decrease in 2007. 17. Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 40.45% 601.21% (999.23%) 650.28%

Interpretation Since the computed values of Proceeds from / Repayment of Short-term Finances showing a significant increase in 2007 and 2009 as compared to base year. However there is a significant decrease in 2006.

Department of Management Sciences Page 52

Page 53: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

18. Dividends Paid

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 121.36% 132.73% 121.11% 81.86%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Dividends Paid showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Dividends Paid from Operations of PSO has been increasing continuously. However there is a decrease in 2009.

19. Net Cash Generated / Used In

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 135.67% 51.75% 321.17% (16.92%)

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Net Cash Generated / Used In showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2008 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Net Cash Generated / Used in of PSO has been increasing.

20. Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for the Year

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% (264.22%) 141.68% (576.78%) (431.61%)

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for the Year showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Total Net Cash Generated / Used In for the Year of PSO has been increasing continuously. 21. Cash at Beginning of the Year

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 16.07% 237.82% 118.91% 602.99%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Cash at Beginning of the Year showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Cash at Beginning of the Year of PSO has been increasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 53

Page 54: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

22. Cash at End of the Year

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Percentage 100% 1479.65% 739.83% 3751.61% 6005.31%

Interpretation

Since the computed values of Cash at End of the Year showing a significant increase from 2006 to 2009 as compared to base year we can conclude that the Cash at End of the Year of PSO has been increasing continuously.

Department of Management Sciences Page 54

Page 55: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Ratio AnalysisFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Short-term Solvency Ratios

Current Ratio 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.24 1.07

Acid Test Ratio 0.59 0.60 0.61 0.57 0.75

Net Working Capital 7,970,161 10,978,097 11,127,546 22,142,472 8,666,404

Activity Ratios

Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio 31.29 25.46 25.71 14.61 7.61

Average Collection Period 11.50 14.14 14.00 24.64 47.30

Accounts Payable Turnover Ratio 7.71 7.63 8.14 5.74 5.54

Average Payment Period 46.71 47.16 44.20 62.73 65.02

Inventory Turnover Ratio 9.66 9.98 11.41 7.46 14.98

Average Conversion Period 37.28 36.08 31.54 48.25 24.03

Total Asset Turnover Ratio 406.26% 425.05% 467.91% 389.65% 399.35%

Gross Fixed Assets 63.68% 91.57% 54.28% 177.04% (90.61%)

Long-term Solvency Ratios

Long-term Debt Equity Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.08 0.12

Debt Equity Ratio 1.98 2.37 2.57 3.10 6.35

Time Interest Earned Ratio 25.20 12.24 6.50 16.18 (1.02)

Total Capitalization Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.11

Debt Ratio 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.76 0.86

Profitability Ratios

Gross Profit Ratio 6.47% 5.77% 3.51% 6.06% 0.49%

Net Profit Ratio 2.66% 2.52% 1.34% 2.84% (1.09%)

Earning Per Share 32.98 43.87 27.34 81.94 (39.05)

Price Earning Ratio 310.21% 276.60% 446.48% 220.33% (311.57%)

Earning Yield Ratio 32.24% 36.15% 22.40% 45.39% (32.10%)

Dividend Per Share 26.00 34.00 21.00 23.50 5.00

Dividend Payout Ratio 78.85% 77.50% 76.80% 28.68% 12.80%

Dividend Yield Ratio 25.42% 28.02% 17.20% 13.02% 4.11%

ROE (Return On Equity) 32.24% 36.15% 22.40% 45.39% (32.10%)

ROI (Return On Investment) 105.17% 131.69% 87.10% 278.87% (85.94%)

Department of Management Sciences Page 55

Page 56: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Interpretation

1. Short-term Solvency Ratios

i. Current Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Current Assets

Current Liabilities1.24:

1 1.23 :1 1.22:1 1.24 :1 1.07 :1

Interpretation

The computed values of Current Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09. It is decreasing because the current liabilities of firm increasing but the current assets are not increasing. It is therefore suggested that the company should lower its current liabilities; increase the value of current assets thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

Department of Management Sciences Page 56

Page 57: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

ii. Acid Test Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Current Assets - (Prepaid Expenses + Inventory)

Current Liabilities0.59:1 0.60:1 0.61:1 0.57:1 0.75:1

Interpretation

The computed value of Acid Test Ratio is showing an increasing trend from year 2005-09. It is increasing because increase in the inventory of the. It is therefore suggested that the company should increase its level of inventory thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

iii. Net Working Capital

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Current Assets -

Current Liabilities(Rs.) 7,970,161 10,978,097 11,127,546 22,142,472 8,666,404

Interpretation

The Net Working Capital of the company has remained positive throughout the last five years. It happens due to increase in the current assets of the firm. So it is therefore suggested that the company should maintain this level of current assets & liabilities, or it can be improved.

Department of Management Sciences Page 57

Page 58: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

2. Activity Ratios

i. Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Net Credit Sales

Average Accounts ReceivableX (Times) 31.29 25.46 25.71 14.61 7.61

Interpretation

The computed values of Account Receivables Turnover Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09. It is decreasing because the receivables of the firm increased and company make sales on credit basis of firm. It is therefore suggested that the company should lower its receivables thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

ii. Average Collection Period

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009360

Accounts Receivable Turnover RatioDays 11.50 14.14 14.00 24.64 47.30

Interpretation

The computed values of Average collection period shows increasing trend from year 2005-09. The value of the average collection period increases because the firm mostly has relaxed its credit terms due to which it takes more time to collect its debt from its creditors. It is therefore suggested that the company should lower its credit sales and tight its credit terms thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

Department of Management Sciences Page 58

Page 59: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

iii. Accounts Payable Turnover Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Net Credit Purchases / C.G.S.

Average Accounts PayableX (Times) 7.71 7.63 8.14 5.74 5.54

Interpretation

The computed value of Accounts Payable Turnover Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09, which is a positive sign for the company. The reason for this decrease is that the proportion increase in accounts payable is greater than the proportion increase in cost of sales.

iv. Average Payment Period

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009360

Accounts Payable Turnover RatioDays 46.71 47.16 44.20 62.73 65.02

Interpretation

The computed value of Average Payment Period shows increasing trend from year 2005-09. This increase in the value is due to the lower value of the Account Payable Turnover Ratio. It is a positive sign for the company.

Department of Management Sciences Page 59

Page 60: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

v. Inventory Turnover Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009C.G.S.

Average InventoryX (Times) 9.66 9.98 11.41 7.46 14.98

Interpretation

The computed value of Inventory Turnover Ratio shows increasing trend from year 2005-09. The increase in the value is due the cost of goods sold of the firm is increasing consistently as compare to the cost of inventory. It is therefore suggested that the company should maintain this level or it can be improved to gain optimum Capital Structure.

vi. Average Conversion Period

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009360

Inventory Turnover RatioDays 37.28 36.08 31.54 48.25 24.03

Interpretation

The computed value of Average Conversion Period is showing decreasing trend from year 2005-09. The decrease in the value of conversion period shows the firm becomes efficient in selling of inventory and converts its inventory into cash in fewer time frames. It is therefore suggested that the company should keeps its conversion period low thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

Department of Management Sciences Page 60

Page 61: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

vii. Total Assets Turnover Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Annual Sales

Total Gross AssetsX 100 406.26% 425.05% 467.91% 389.65% 399.35%

Interpretation

The computed value of Total Assets Turnover Ratio shows a mix trend from year 2005-09, but mainly decreasing. This happens due to decrease in the sales volume as compare to the total assets of the company, which have not increased with the same proportion. It is therefore suggested that the company should maintain its sales and total assets level. Thus it can maintain an optimum Capital Structure.

viii. Gross Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Annual Sales

Gross Fixed AssetsX 100 63.68% 91.57% 54.28% 177.04% (90.61%)

Interpretation

The computed value of Gross Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio shows increasing trend for the years 2005-08, but a loss in 2009. This increase is due to the low increase in the values of both tangible and intangible assets of the firm. So it is suggested that the company should increase its non-current assets.

Department of Management Sciences Page 61

Page 62: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

3. Long-term Solvency Ratios

i. Long-term Debt Equity Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Long-term Debt

EquityX (Times) 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.08 0.12

Interpretation

The computed value of Long-term Debt Equity Ratio shows a consistent trend from year 2005-09. This is because the company has not obtained any long-term loan & equity. It is therefore suggested that the company should increase its long-term debt; thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

ii. Debt Equity Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Total Debt

EquityX (Times) 1.98 2.37 2.57 3.10 6.35

Interpretation

The computed value of Debt Equity Ratio shows increasing trend from year 2005-09. It means the ratio of debt in the business structure is not an appropriate, which is not a healthy sign for the business. It is therefore suggested that the company should lower the value of debt or increase the value of equity to maintain the ratio of 60:40 as per the rules of State Bank of Pakistan, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

Department of Management Sciences Page 62

Page 63: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

iii. Time Interest Earned Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009EBIT

Interest Expense25.20:

112.24:1 6.50:1 16.18:1 (1.02):1

Interpretation

The computed value of Time Interest Earned Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09. The decrease in the value is due to the slight increase in the interest charges on short term borrowings of the company in comparison to the earning for the same year. It is therefore suggested that the company should improve its interest payment on borrowings, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

iv. Total Capitalization Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Long-term Debt

Long-term Debt + EquityX (Times) 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.11

Interpretation

The computed value of Total Capitalization Ratio shows a consistent trend from year 2005-09. This shows that company is maintain this ratio of debt and equity for the last five years. It is therefore suggested that the company should improve this ratio so that it can be able to capture a bigger portion of market.

Department of Management Sciences Page 63

Page 64: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

v. Debt Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Total Liabilities

Total Assets0.66:

10.70:1 0.72:1 0.76:1 0.86:1

Interpretation

The computed value of Debt Ratio shows increasing trend from year 2005-09. The increase in the Debt Ratio shows that the debt paying ability of the company has increased because the company is increasing its total assets and company is moving towards growth.

4. Profitability Ratios

i. Gross Profit Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Gross Profit

Net SalesX 100 6.47% 5.77% 3.51% 6.06% 0.49%

Interpretation

The computed value of Gross Profit Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09.The decrease in the value shows that the company’s sales are decreasing and the cost of goods sold of the firm is also increasing which ultimately decreases the gross profit of the company. It is therefore suggested that the company should increase its sales and decrease its cost of goods sold, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

ii. Net Profit Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Department of Management Sciences Page 64

Page 65: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Net ProfitNet Sales

X 100 2.66% 2.52% 1.34% 2.84% (1.09%)

Interpretation

The computed value of Net Profit Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09. The decrease in the value is due to the decrease in the profit of the firm due to increase in the operating expenses largely and finance cost of the firm also increased. It is therefore suggested that the company should reduce its operating expenses and also finance cost, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

iii. Earning Per Share

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009EACS

Number of Share OutstandingRs. 32.98 43.87 27.34 81.94 (39.05)

Interpretation

The computed value of Earning per Share Ratio shows increasing trend from year 2005-08, but in 2009 the company did not earn any profit so it became negative. The increase in the value shows that the earning per share of the company increased up to Rs 81.94. In year 2008 it is maximum after that company experience the loss. It is therefore suggested that the company should increase its profits, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

iv. Price Earning Ratio

Department of Management Sciences Page 65

Page 66: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Market Price Per Share

Earning Per ShareX 100 310.21% 276.60% 446.48% 220.33% (311.57%)

Interpretation

The computed value of Price Earning Ratio shows fluctuating trend from year 2005-08, but in 2009 company incurred loss. The fluctuation is due to increase or decrease in the market price of the shares of the company. It is therefore suggested that the company should maintain the level of its shares in the market, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

v. Earning Yield Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Earning Per Share

Market Price Per ShareX 100 32.24% 36.15% 22.40% 45.39% (32.10%)

Interpretation

The computed value of Earning Yield Ratio shows increasing trend from year 2005-08, but in 2009 company incurred loss. The increase in the value is due to the consistent value of market price. It is therefore suggested that the company should increase its market price so it can attain the optimum Capital Structure.

Department of Management Sciences Page 66

Page 67: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

vi. Dividend Per Share

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Dividend Paid

Number of Shares OutstandingRs. 26.00 34.00 21.00 23.50 5.00

Interpretation

Since the computed value of Dividend Per Share Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09. The decrease in the value is due to the less amounts of dividend paid. It is therefore suggested that the company should lower its number of shares outstanding or increase the value of dividend paid thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

vii. Dividend Payout Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Dividend Per ShareEarning Per Share

X 100 78.85% 77.50% 76.80% 28.68% 12.80%

Interpretation

The computed value of Dividend Payout Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09. There is a continuous decrease in the ratio which is due to distributing lower portion of earning as dividend by the company. It also clarifies that company is retaining the maximum portion of profit to capture high market share. It is therefore suggested that the company should maintains proper policy for the distribution of its dividend, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

Department of Management Sciences Page 67

Page 68: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

viii. Dividend Yield Ratio

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Dividend Per Share

Market Price Per ShareX 100 25.42% 28.02% 17.20% 13.02% 4.11%

Interpretation

The computed value of Dividend Yield Ratio shows decreasing trend from year 2005-09. The decrease in the value is due to the larger amounts of market price & Lower levels of dividend per share. It is therefore suggested that the company should increase the value of dividend per share and decrease the market price per share so that it can achieve an optimum Capital Structure.

ix. ROE (Return On Equity)

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009EACSEquity

X 100 32.24% 36.15% 22.40% 45.39% (32.10%)

Interpretation

The computed value of ROE shows a mix trend from year 2005-09. This ratio increase in first two years but in 2007 it decreases than again in 2008 it increases, but in 2009 company incurred a loss. So it is therefore suggested that the company should increase the value of net profit, thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

x. ROI (Return On Investment)

Years 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Department of Management Sciences Page 68

Page 69: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Operating ProfitAverage Operating Assets

X 100 105.17% 131.69% 87.10% 278.87% (85.94%)

Interpretation

The computed value of the ratio shows mix trend. The ROI has increased in year 2005 and 2008 which is a positive sign for both investors and company. The reason for increase in the return on investment is an increase in the operating profit of the company. In year 2009 the ratio is showing weak position of the company because it is negative in this year which is alarming sign for the company. It is therefore suggested that the company should increase the value of return on investment thus by maintaining an optimum Capital Structure.

Bankruptcy AnalysisFor The Period of 5 Years ended on June 31st, 2009

Department of Management Sciences Page 69

Page 70: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Univariate Model

Years

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

(Cash Flow / Total Debt)*100(0.551

)(5.746

)(2.636

)(7.479

)(8.684

)

(Net Income / Total Assets)*100 10.813 10.724 6.2750 11.056(4.366

)(Total Debt / Total Assets)*100 66.459 70.339 71.983 75.639 86.397

Multivariate Model / Z - Score

Particulars 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

.012 * ((X1 = Networking Capital / Total Assets)*100) 0.1828 0.1877 0.1787 0.2090 0.0678

.014 * ((X2 = Retained Earnings / Total Assets)*100) 0.4237 0.3810 0.3601 0.3222 0.1748

.033 * ((X3 = Earnings Before Interest & Taxes / Total Assets)*100) 0.6033 0.5786 0.3656 0.5905 0.1102

.006 * ((X4 = Market Value of Equity / Book Value of Total Debt)*100) 1.1427 0.8049 0.7384 0.4132 0.2997

.010 * ((X5 = Sales / Total Assets)*100) 4.0626 4.2505 4.6791 3.8965 3.9935

Z – Score 6.4150 6.2027 6.3219 5.4313 4.4256

InterpretationUnivariate

Since the computed values of first two ratios are showing decreasing trend and the last one is showing increasing trend so we can conclude that the company is moving towards bankruptcy.

Multivariate

Since the computed values of Z-score in each year is above then our bench mark i.e. more than 2.675 so we can conclude that the company is far away from bankruptcy but actually the trend of Z-score is showing a decreasing rate which may be alarming in the future if it continues.

Department of Management Sciences Page 70

Page 71: Financial Management Pso Project report

Pakistan State Oil

Conclusion & Recommendations

As the financial position of the company shows that the overall profitability of the company is decreasing. The volume of profit is decreasing from year 2004 to year 2009 continuously. This continuous decrease in profit is not a good sign for the PSO because due to this the firm may suffers a lot and the price of the shares can be decreases. So company should improve its operations so that it can earn more profits.

In bankruptcy analysis, the company shows weak financial position in univariate model. On the basis of this we can conclude that the company is not working efficiently and not provides any opportunity of dividend or capital gain to its investors. Due to this weak position the chances of bankruptcy increase rapidly. But in multivariate the company is showing good results. But the trend analysis of the last five years is showing decreasing trend. So we can say that the company may become bankrupt in the future. So company should mange its assets efficiently so that this situation can be solved.

However the sale of the company increases over the period of last five years it shows that the company is moving towards progress and try to improve its operations by this the profit of the company increases. So it is recommended that the company needs a lot of efforts so it is necessary that the company should have to improve its operations to compete with others and capture the market share.

Department of Management Sciences Page 71