Final Results Memo - NFPA · Subject: NFPA 1072 First Draft TC FINAL Ballot Results (F2016 Cycle)...

National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Phone: 617-770-3000 • Fax: 617-770-0700 • www.nfpa.org

M E M O R A N D U M

To: NFPA Technical Committee on Hazardous Materials Response Personnel

From: Jenny Depew, Administrator, Technical Projects

Date: May 14, 2015

Subject: NFPA 1072 First Draft TC FINAL Ballot Results (F2016 Cycle)

According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary affirmative votes to pass ballot with the exception of FR-17, shown in the attached report as CI-17, (a First Revision that failed ballot).

33 Members Eligible to Vote 1 Not Returned (C. Makins, Jr.) 4 Affirmative on All Revisions 1 Affirmative with Comment on one or more Revisions (C. Wright) 27 Negative on one or more Revisions (C. Baxter, H. K. Carr, W. Coffey, K.W. Collins, C. D'Onofrio, R. Edinger,

R. Emery, R. Ingram, K. Johnson, T. Lilley, B. Lindley, M. Linsley, W. McNett, L. Miller, T. Miller, G. Noll, J. Porter, L. Preston, T. Rehak, R. Royall, Jr., R. Schnepp, D. Simpson, R. Stenner, F. Terryn, C. Tracy, K. Uzeloc, C. Wright)

0 Abstentions on one or more Revisions The attached report shows the number of affirmative, negative, and abstaining votes as well as the explanation of the vote for each first revision.

There are two criteria necessary for each first revision to pass ballot: (1) simple majority and (2) affirmative 2/3 vote. The mock examples below show how the calculations are determined.

(1) Example for Simple Majority: Assuming there are 20 vote eligible committee members, 11 affirmative votes are required to pass ballot. (Sample calculation: 20 members eligible to vote ÷ 2 = 10 + 1 = 11)

(2) Example for Affirmative 2/3: Assuming there are 20 vote eligible committee members and 1 member did not

return their ballot and 2 members abstained, the number of affirmative votes required would be 12. (Sample calculation: 20 members eligble to vote – 1 not returned – 2 abstentions = 17 x 0.66 = 11.22 = 12 )

As always please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

First Revision No. 1-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 1.1 ]

1.1* Scope.

This standard identifies the minimum job performance requirements (JPRs) for personnel at the scene ofa hazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) incident at the following levels: awareness,operations, operations mission-specific, hazardous materials technician, and incident commander.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Tom McGowan

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Feb 23 19:05:29 EST 2015

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with submitter, first use of term in chapter so the acronym needs to beshown.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 27-NFPA 1072-2014 [Section No. 1.1]

Ballot Results

This item has passed ballot

33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All

0 Affirmative with Comments

0 Negative with Comments

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All

Baxter, Christina M.

Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.

Preston, Lawrence L.

Rehak, Timothy R.

Royall, Jr., Robert W.

Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert

Swingholm, Matthew E.

Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


2 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 2-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 2.3.1 ]

2.3.1 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC 20402.

Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act , Public Law 99–499, 1986.

Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2332a, “Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations Part 1910.120, “Hazardous Waste Operations and EmergencyResponse.

Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations, “Shipping.”

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations “Transportation”.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG), 2012 edition .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter to add Title 49 as a reference and correct minor editorialissues; please items in alphabetical order.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 1072-2014 [Section No. 2.3.1]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald


3 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


4 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections.

NFPA 51, Standard for the Design and Installation of Oxygen–Fuel Gas Systems for Welding, Cutting,and Allied Processes , 2013 edition.

NFPA 70 ® , National Electrical Code ® , 2014 edition.

NFPA 472, Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of MassDestruction Incidents, 2013 edition.

NFPA 1000, Standard for Fire Service Professional Qualifications Accreditation and Certification Systems,2017 edition.


Submitter Full Name: Thomas McGowan

Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Apr 06 07:36:39 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding text to include mandatory reference to the document.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris


5 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


6 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.1* Allied Professional.

That person who possesses the knowledge, skills, and technical competence to provide assistance in theselection, implementation, and evaluation of mission-specific tasks at a hazardous materials/weapons ofmass destruction (WMD) incident. [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter that the term "mission-specific" is too limiting whenaddressing allied professionals as they may be call to assist with any issue at any incident.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


7 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


8 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.3 Awareness Level Personnel.

According to 29 CFR 1910.120, First Responder at the Awareness Level, personnel Personnel who, inthe course of their normal duties, could encounter an emergency involving hazardous materials/weaponsof mass destruction (WMD) and who are expected to recognize the presence of the hazardousmaterials/WMD, protect themselves, call for trained personnel, and secure the scene.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Mar 24 06:03:50 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is removing the direct reference to OSHA.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.


9 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


10 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 21-NFPA 1072-2015 [ New Section after 3.3.4 ]

3.3.5 Chemical Compatibility.

The ability of personal protective clothing and equipment to resist exposure to hazardous materials.

See FR-27

3.3.5.1 Degradation.

A chemical action involving the molecular breakdown of a protective clothing material or equipment dueto contact with a chemical.

See FR-35

3.3.5.2 Penetration.

The movement of a material through a suit's closures, such as zippers, buttonholes, seams, flaps, orother design features of chemical-protective clothing, and through punctures, cuts, and tears. [ 472,2013]

3.3.5.3 Permeation.

A chemical action involving the movement of chemicals, on a molecular level, through intact material.[ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Mar 16 08:08:44 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC recognizes the need to include these definitions and to associate them as subsectionsto the larger component of chemical compatibility.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


11 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


12 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.4 CANUTEC.

The Canadian Transport Emergency Center, operated by Transport Canada, which that providesemergency response information and assistance on a 24-hour basis for responders to hazardousmaterials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) incidents.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with submitter that the grammar "which" or "that" . . . needs to be consistentwith 3.3.4 CHEMTREC and 3.3.62 SETIQ.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


13 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


14 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.9 Container.

A receptacle, piping, or pipeline used for storing or transporting material of any kind. ; synonymous with“packaging” in transportation.

3.3.9.1 Bulk transportation containers.

Containers, including transport vehicles, having a liquid capacity of more than 119 gal (450 L), a solidscapacity of more than 882 lb (400 kg), or a compressed gas water capacity of more than 1001 lb (454kg) that are either on or in a transport vehicle or vessel or constructed as an integral part of the transportvehicle including the following:

(1) Cargo tanks: nonpressure tanks — MC-306/DOT-406 or equivalent; low pressure tanks —MC-307-DOT-407 or equivalent; corrosive liquid tanks — MC – 312/DOT-412 or equivalent; highpressure tanks — MC-331 or equivalent; and cryogenic tanks — MC-338 or equivalent

(2) Portable tanks, including intermodal tanks: nonpressure tanks, pressure tanks, cryogenic tanks,and tube modules

(3) Tank cars: nonpressure tank cars, pressure tanks cars, and cryogenic tank cars

(4) Ton containers

3.3.9.2 Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs).

Pressure, nonpressure, and cryogenic rigid or flexible portable containers, other than cylinders orportable tanks, designed for mechanical lifting.

3.3.9.3 Nonbulk Containers.

Containers having a liquid capacity of 119 gal (450 L) or less, a solids capacity of 882 lb (400 kg) orless, or a compressed gas water capacity of 1001 lb (454 kg) or less.

3.3.9.4 Fixed Facility Storage Tanks.

Atmospheric and low pressure storage tanks; pressurized storage tanks; and cryogenic storage tanks.

3.3.9.5 Pipeline.

A length of pipe including pumps, valves, flanges, control devices, strainers, and/or similar equipmentfor conveying fluids. [ 70, 2014]

3.3.9.6 Piping .

Assemblies of piping components used to convey, distribute, mix, separate, discharge, meter, control, orsnub fluid flows. Piping also includes pipe-supporting elements, but does not include support structures,such as building frames, bents, foundations, or any other equipment excluded from this standard. [ 51 ,2013]

3.3.9.7* Radioactive materials containers .

Containers for radioactive materials, including excepted packaging, industrial packaging, Type A, TypeB, and Type C packaging.

Supplemental Information

File Name Description

FR-23_A.3.3.9.10.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:


15 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC recognizes the need to define container more inclusively and with greater clarity. TheTC is adding annex material to further clarify the definition.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert



16 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


17 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

FR-23, new Annex material

A.3.3.9.10 Radioactive Materials Containers.

Excepted packaging are containers used to transport materials with extremely low levels of radioactivity that meet only general design requirements for any hazardous material. Excepted packaging ranges from a product's fiberboard box to a sturdy wooden or steel crate, and typical shipments include limited quantities of materials, instruments, and articles such as smoke detectors. Excepted packaging will contain non-life-endangering amounts of radioactive material.

Industrial packaging are containers used to transport materials that present limited hazard to the public and the environment. Examples of these materials are contaminated equipment and radioactive waste solidified in materials such as concrete. This packaging is grouped into three categories based on the strength of packaging: IP-1, IP-2, and IP-3. Industrial packaging will contain nonlife endangering amounts of radioactive material.

Type A packaging are containers used to transport radioactive materials with concentrations of radioactivity not exceeding the limits established in 49 CFR 173.431. Typically, Type A packaging has an inner containment vessel made of glass, plastic, or metal and packing material made of polyethylene, rubber, or vermiculite. Examples of materials shipped in Type A packaging are radiopharmaceuticals and low-level radioactive wastes. Type A packaging will contain nonlife endangering amounts of radioactive material.

Type B packaging are containers used to transport radioactive materials with radioactivity levels higher than those allowed in Type A packaging, such as spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Limits on activity contained in Type B packaging are provided in 49 CFR 173.431. Type B packaging ranges from small drums [55 gal (208 L)] to heavily shielded steel casks that sometimes weigh more than 138 tons (125 metric tonnes). Type B packaging can contain potentially life endangering amounts of radioactive material.

Type C packaging are containers used for consignments transported by aircraft of high-activity radioactive materials that have not been certified as “low dispersible radioactive material” (including plutonium). They are designed to withstand severe accident conditions associated with air transport without loss of containment or significant increase in external radiation levels. The Type C packaging performance requirements are significantly more stringent than those for Type B packaging. Type C packaging is not authorized for domestic use but can be authorized for international shipments of high-activity radioactive material consignments. Regulations require that both Type B and Type C packaging be marked with a trefoil symbol to ensure that the package can be positively identified as carrying radioactive material. The trefoil symbol must be resistant to the effects of both fire and water so that it is likely to survive a severe accident and serve as a warning to emergency responders.

The performance requirements for Type C packaging include those applicable to Type B packaging with enhancements on some tests that are significantly more stringent than those for Type B packaging. For example, a 200 mph (321.8 km/hr) impact onto an unyielding target is required instead of the 30 ft (9.1 m) drop test required for Type B packaging; a 60-minute fire test is required instead of the 30-minute test for Type B packaging; and a puncture/tearing test is required. These stringent tests are expected to result in packaging designs that will survive more severe aircraft accidents than Type B packaging designs.


3.3.13 Control.

The procedures, techniques, and methods used in the mitigation of hazardous materials/weapons of massdestruction (WMD) incidents, including containment, extinguishment, and confinement. [472, 2013]

Moved by FR-24

3.3.13.1 Confinement.

Those procedures taken to keep a material, once released, in a defined or local area. [ 472 , 2013

3.3.13.2 Containment.

The actions taken to keep a material in its container (e.g., stop a release of the material or reduce theamount being released). [ 472 , 2013]

3.3.13.3 Extinguishment.

To cause to cease burning.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC recognizes the need to place the definitions of containment (3.3.10), extinguishment(3.3.29), and confinement under 3,3,13 Control. . . . to be consistent with control zones,decontamination, etc.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All



18 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


19 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 25-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 3.3.14 [Excluding any

Sub-Sections] ]

The areas at hazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) incidents within an established/acontrolled perimeter that are designated based upon safety and the degree of hazard. [472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC wishes to fix a typo.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


20 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


21 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 28-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 3.3.16.1 ]

3.3.16.1* Emergency Decontamination.

The physical process of immediately reducing contamination of individuals in potentially life- threateningsituations with or without the formal establishment of a decontamination corridor. [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is clarifying the definition.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


22 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


23 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.17.3* Technical Decontamination.

The planned and systematic process of reducing contamination to a level that is as low as reasonablyachievable. [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC reviewed the associated definitions to Decontamination and decided to remove"Technical Decontamination" from the list to better clarify the intent of decontamination.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 71-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. 3.3.16.2]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


24 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


25 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.18 Degradation.

(1) A chemical action involving the molecular breakdown of a protective clothing material or equipmentdue to contact with a chemical. (2) The molecular breakdown of the spilled or released material torender it less hazardous during control operations. [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC has moved this definition under "chemical Compatibility" for consistency. Refer toFR# 21.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.


26 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


27 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


See FR-24

3.3.30 Extinguishment.

To cause to cease burning.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC has moved the definition under confinement for consistency. Refer to FR# 24.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.


28 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


29 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.29 Hazard/Hazardous Harm .

Capable of posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, or the environment; capable of causing harm.[ 472, 2013] Adverse effect created by being exposed to a hazard.

3.3.30 Hazard.

Capable of causing harm or posing an unreasonable risk to life, health, property, or environment.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC recognizes the need to clarify the terms and added the definition for "harm" to assiston the terminology.

ResponseMessage:


Public Input No. 65-NFPA 1072-2015 [New Section after 3.3.31]


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.


30 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


31 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.33* Hazardous Materials Officer.

(NIMS: Hazardous Materials Branch Director/Group Supervisor.) The person who is responsible fordirecting and coordinating all operations involving hazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction(WMD) as assigned by the incident commander. [472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC added text for consistency.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.


32 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


33 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.35* Hazardous Materials Safety Officer.

(NIMS: Assistant Safety Officer — Hazardous Material.) The person who works within an incidentmanagement system (IMS) (specifically, the hazardous materials branch/group) to ensure that recognizedhazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) safe practices are followed at hazardousmaterials/WMD incidents.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC added text for consistency.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.


34 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


35 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.39 Incident Analysis.

The process of analyzing the risk at an incident by identifying the materials and containers involved,predicting the likely behavior of each container and its contents, and estimating the potential harm oroutcomes associated with that behavior.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter that the "Incident Analysis" needs to be included in thedefinitions.

The phrase "results of the incident analysis" is used in Chapter 7, sections 7.3.1, 7.3.2, 7.3.3,7.3.4, 7.4.1, 7.4.2, 7.4.3.1. This is a new term and does not have a corresponding definition inChapter 3.

If "results of the incident size up" is a better term then the references in Chapter 7 "results of theincident analysis" should be changed for consistency. If the phrases in Chapter 7 are changedthen there will be no need to add this definition to Chapter 3.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald


36 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


37 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.19 Detection and Monitoring Equipment.

Instruments and devices used to detect, identify classify, or quantify materials.



FR-33_move_and_legislative_changes.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC has moved the definition to Detection and Monitoring Equipment. The TC agrees that thedefinition in Chapter 3 as Detection and Monitoring Equipment and again as Monitoring andDetection Equipment (3.3.45) . . . recommend keeping Detection and Monitoring with the addition ofthe word "classify" from 3.3.45 and deleting 3.3.45.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.


38 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Affirmative with Comment

Wright, Charles J.

Believe the TC voted to use the term "classify" in place of "identify" but not both.


39 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

FR-33, move and legislative changes

[move to 3.3.20]3.3.45 Monitoring and DetectionDetection and Monitoring Equipment.

Instruments and devices used to detect, identify, classify, or quantify materials.


See FR-23

3.3.47* Packaging.

Any container that holds a material (hazardous or nonhazardous). [ 472, 2013]

3.3.47.1* Bulk Packaging.

Any packaging, including transport vehicles, having a liquid capacity of more than 119 gal (450 L), asolids capacity of more than 882 lb (400 kg), or a compressed gas water capacity of more than 1001 lb(454 kg). [ 472, 2013]

3.3.47.2 Nonbulk Packaging.

Any packaging having a liquid capacity of 119 gal (450 L) or less, a solids capacity of 882 lb (400 kg) orless, or a compressed gas water capacity of 1001 lb (454 kg) or less. [ 472, 2013]

3.3.47.3* Radioactive Materials Packaging.

Any packaging for radioactive materials including excepted packaging, industrial packaging, Type A,Type B, and Type C packaging. [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC has moved this information to "Container" for a more inclusive perspective. Referto FR# 23.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald


40 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


41 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 35-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections 3.3.48, 3.3.49 ]

See FR-21

3.3.48 Penetration.

The movement of a material through a suit's closures, such as zippers, buttonholes, seams, flaps, orother design features of chemical-protective clothing, and through punctures, cuts, and tears. [ 472,2013]

3.3.49 Permeation.

A chemical action involving the movement of chemicals, on a molecular level, through intact material.[ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC has moved these definitions to "Chemical Comparability" for clarity and consistencywithin the document.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade


42 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


43 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.46* Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

The equipment (protective clothing and respiratory equipment) provided to shield or isolate a person fromthe chemical, physical, and thermal hazards that can be hazards encountered at hazardousmaterials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) incidents. [ 472, 2013] incident operations.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with submitter to delete the words "that can be" and further clarifies the definitionto be more inclusive of all types and equipment used for protection and all hazards associated toa hazardous materials/WMD incident.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.


44 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


45 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.47.3* Site Safety and Control Plan.

A site-specific tactical safety document used by within the hazardous materials branch under the incidentcommand system (ICS) to organize information important to hazardous materials response operations.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC has clarified the definition.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


46 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


47 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.50 Protective Clothing.

Equipment designed to protect the wearer from heat and/or hazardous materials or from the hazardouscomponent of a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) contacting the skin or eyes. There are several typesof protective clothing: chemical-protective clothing (CPC), which includes liquid splash–protective clothingand vapor-protective clothing; high temperature–protective clothing; and structural fire-fighting protectiveclothing

3.3.50.1* Chemical-Protective Clothing (CPC).

Items made from chemical-resistive materials, such as clothing, hood, boots, and gloves, which aredesigned and configured to protect the wearer's torso, head, arms, legs, hands, and feet from hazardousmaterials. [ 472, 2013] The ensemble elements (garment, gloves and footwear) provided to shield orisolate a person from the hazards encountered during hazardous materials/WMD incident operations.

3.3.50.2* High Temperature–Protective Clothing.

Protective clothing designed to protect the wearer for short-term high temperature exposures. [472, 2013]

3.3.50.3* Liquid Splash–Protective Clothing Ensemble .

The garment portion of a chemical-protective clothing ensemble that is designed and configured toprotect the wearer against chemical liquid splashes but not against chemical vapors or gases. [472,2013 Multiple elements of compliant protective clothing and equipment products that when worn togetherprovide protection from some risks, but not all risks, of hazardous materials/WMD emergency incidentoperations involving liquids.

3.3.50.4* Structural Fire-Fighting Protective Clothing.

The fire resistant protective clothing normally worn by fire fighters during structural fire-fighting operations,which includes a helmet, coat, pants, boots, gloves, PASS device, and a fire-resistant hood to cover partsof the head and neck not protected by the helmet and respirator facepiece. [472, 2013]

3.3.50.5* Vapor-Protective Clothing.

The garment portion of a chemical-protective clothing ensemble that is designed and configured toprotect the wearer against chemical vapors or gases. [ 472 , 2013] Multiple elements of compliantprotective clothing and equipment that when worn together provide protection from some risks, but not allrisks, of vapor, liquid-splash, and particulate environments during hazardous materials/WMD incidentoperations.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is clarifying the definitions.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters


48 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.


Wright, Charles J.

Agree with the definition changes, but still have a problem with the order the definitions are presented. The orderindicates they are all equal, but "liquid" and "vapor" are actually subsets of CPC.


49 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.54 Risk

The probability or threat of suffering a harm or loss.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC agrees with the submitter that a is required and refined the submitters definition.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


50 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


51 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.57 Safety Data Sheet (SDS).

A form, provided by chemical manufacturers and compounders (blenders) of chemicals thatcontains distributors of hazardous products, containing information about chemical composition, physicaland chemical properties, health and safety hazards, emergency response, and waste disposal of thematerial.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC clarified the definition.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.


52 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


53 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.59 SETIQ.

The Emergency Transportation System for the Chemical Industry in Mexico that provides emergencyresponse information and assistance on a 24-hour basis for responders to emergencies involvinghazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD). [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter for the need to include an explanation of what SETIQ doesto be consistent with CHEMTREC and CANUTEC.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


54 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


55 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.60 Size-Up.

A mental process used to evaluate the influencing factors at an incident prior to committing resources toa course of action. [ 1670 , 2009]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC doesn't wish to include a definition for size-up.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


56 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


57 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.3.61 Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).

A written directive that establishes specific operational or administrative methods to be followedroutinely for the performance of a task or for the use of equipment.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC recognizes the need to add this definition. The term is used within this document.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


58 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


59 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 110-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 3.3.67 [Excluding any

Sub-Sections] ]

(1) Any destructive device, such as any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas bomb, grenade, rocket havinga propellant charge of more than four ounces, missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of morethan one quarter ounce (7 grams), mine, or device similar to the above the preceding description ; (2) anyweapon involving toxic or poisonous chemicals; (3) any weapon involving a disease organism; or (4) anyweapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life. [472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Apr 07 11:51:32 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is changing text for clarity.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


60 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


61 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 109-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections 3.3.67.1, 3.3.67.2 ]

3.3.64.1* Radiological Weapons of Mass Destruction. [472, 2013]

3.3.64.2* Improvised Nuclear Device (IND).

An illicit nuclear weapon that is bought, stolen, or otherwise obtained from a nuclear state (that is, anational government with nuclear weapons), or a weapon fabricated from fissile material that is capable ofproducing a nuclear explosion. [472, 2013]

3.3.64.2.1* Radiation Dispersal Device (RDD).

A device, also referred to as a "dirty bomb," designed to spread radioactive material through a detonationof conventional explosives or other (non-nuclear) means. ; also referred to as a “dirty bomb.” [ 472, 2013]

3.3.64.2.2* Radiation Exposure Device (RED).

Radioactive A device, used interchangeably with the term "radiological exposure device" or "radiationemitting device," consisting of radioactive material, either as a sealed source or as of material withinsome type of container, or a radiation-generating device, such as an x⁄ray device, that directly exposespeople to ionizing radiation; the term is interchangeable with the term radiological exposure device orradiation emitting device . [ 472, 2013] to cause harm by exposure to ionizing radiation.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is changing text to clarify the definitions.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.


62 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


63 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.4.1 Core Competencies.

The knowledge, skills, and judgment needed by operations level responders who respond to releases orpotential releases of hazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD). [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter that since the phase in not used in the document that itdoesn't need to appear in the definitions chapter.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


64 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


65 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


3.4.10 Operations Level Responders Assigned to Use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) .

Persons, competent at the operations level, who are assigned to use personal protective equipment athazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) incidents.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding PPE.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


66 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


67 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


4.1.2*

Awareness personnel shall be are persons who, in the course of their normal duties, could encounter anemergency involving hazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and who are expected torecognize the presence of the hazardous materials/WMD, protect themselves, call for trained personnel,and secure the area but not take actions that require a higher level of training.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC agrees with the submitter to be consistent through out the document.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


68 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


69 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 13-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections 4.2(A), 4.2(B) ]

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. What hazardous materials and WMD are; hazard classes and divisions; hazardsassociated with various hazardous materials/WMD; indicators of typical container shapes that canindicate the presence of hazardous materials/WMD; information available in transportation to and fromfacilities to identify NFPA 704 markings and Globally Harmonized System (GHS); others indicators of thepresence of hazardous materials/WMD; and hazard information available from the U.S. Department ofTransportation (DOT) Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG) or an equivalent document, safety datasheets (SDS), and manufacturer, shipper, and transporter carrier (highway, rail, water, air, pipeline)documents (including shipping papers) and contacts, and how to access manufacturer, shipper, andtransporter carrier resources.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Recognizing the presence of hazardous materials/WMD; identifying hazardousmaterials involved; and identifying the potential hazards associated with the material(s) involved, using theERG or equivalent guide, SDS, and manufacturer, shipper, and transporter carrier documents (includingshipping papers) and contacts.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC agrees with the submitting and includes the changes to this section.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 49-NFPA 1072-2014 [Section No. 4.2(A)]



Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl


70 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


71 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 14-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 4.3(A) ]

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Use of approved documents reference sources to identify recommendedprecautions to be taken to protect responders and the public; policies and procedures for isolating thehazard area and denying entry; and the purpose of and methods for isolating the hazard area and denyingentry.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC agrees with submitter to change to correspond with terminology in 4.3

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


72 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


73 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 15-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.4 ]

5.1.1

Operations level responders shall meet the job performance requirements defined in Sections 4.2through 4.4.

5.1.2

Operations level responders shall meet the job performance requirements defined in Sections 5.2through 5.6.

5.1.3

Operations level responders are those persons responding to or encountering an emergency involvinghazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to protect nearby persons, the environment, orproperty from the effects of the release.

5.1.4

Operations level responders shall have additional competencies that are specific to the response missionand expected tasks as determined by the AHJ.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with submitter that "Level" needs to be included in each of the followingsections: 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, and 5.1.4.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All



74 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


75 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 16-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections 5.2(A), 5.2(B) ]

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Definitions of hazard classes and divisions; types of containers; containeridentification markings, including piping and pipeline markings and contacting information ; types ofinformation to be collected during the hazardous materials/WMD incident survey; availability of shippingpapers in transportation and of safety data sheets (SDS) at facilities; types of hazard information availablefrom, and how to contact contacting CHEMTREC, CANUTEC, and SETIQ, local, state and federalgovernmental authorities, and manufacturers, shippers, and transporters for the types of hazardinformation available from these sources; carriers; how to communicate with carrier representatives toreduce impact of a release; basic physical and chemical properties, including boiling point, chemicalreactivity, corrosivity (pH), flammable (explosive) range [LFL (LEL) and UFL (UEL)], flash point, ignition(autoignition) temperature, particle size, persistence, physical state (solid, liquid, gas), radiation (ionizingand nonionizing), specific gravity, toxic products of combustion, vapor density, vapor pressure, and watersolubility; how to identify the behavior of a material and its container based on the material's physical andchemical properties, and the hazards associated with the identified behavior ; including additionalhazards associated with terrorist or criminal activities, and subsequent harm associated with the identifiedbehavior; and how to estimate outcomes.

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Identifying container types, materials, location of release, and surrounding conditions ata hazardous materials/WMD incident; collecting and interpreting hazard information; communicating withpipeline operators or carrier representatives; describing the likely behavior of the hazardous materials orWMD and its container; and describing the potential hazards, harm, and outcomes associated with thatbehavior.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter in that an operations level responder who is trained to "identify thebehavior of a material and its container based on the material's physical and chemical properties"should be taught to understand certain specific physical and chemical properties. The list of basicphysical and chemical properties is found in the Annex; however, since the Annex is not part of therequirements, adding these properties from the Annex to the requisite knowledge of this JPR willinsure that a person at this level is able to interpret these properties so that they are able "identify thebehavior of a material and its container based on the material's physical and chemical properties".

ResponseMessage:


Public Input No. 51-NFPA 1072-2014 [Section No. 5.2(B)]


Ballot Results



76 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


77 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Committee Input No. 17-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 5.3 ]

This was a First Revision that failed ballot.

5.3* Identify Response Options.

Identify the response options for a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment, policies and procedures, approved reference sources, and the results scope of theincident size-up problem , so that response objectives, response options, safety precautions, suitability ofapproved personal protective equipment (PPE) available, and emergency decontamination needs areidentified.

(A) *

Requisite Knowledge. Policies and procedures for hazardous materials/WMD incident operations; basiccomponents of an incident action plan (IAP); modes of operation; types of response objectives; types ofresponse options; safety procedures; risk analysis concepts; purpose, advantages, limitations, uses, andoperational components of approved PPE to determine if PPE is suitable for the incident conditions; differencebetween exposure and contamination; contamination types; routes of exposure; methods of contamination;and purpose, advantages, and limitations of emergency decontamination.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Identifying response objectives and response options based on known incident conditionsand available resources; identifying whether approved PPE is suitable for the incident conditions; andidentifying emergency decontamination needs.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees that 5.2 addresses identifying the scope of the problem and does not mention size-up,therefore the given in 5.3 should be "scope of the problem" not "results of the incident size-up" to beconsistent with 5.2. The term "size-up" is only mentioned at this point in the document. Also referencethe removal of 3.3..63 "size-up" in the definitions chapter.

The TC believes that the identification of "objectives" doesn't constitute developing objectives and isnecessary at the operational level response. It is the consensus opinion of the NFPA TechnicalCommittee (TC) for Hazardous Materials Response Personnel that a person operating at a hazardousmaterials incident at the Hazardous Materials Operations Level shall be capable of establishingresponse objectives for hazmat response personnel functioning on the hazardous materials site.

The Incident Commander/Unified Command, who by law must be only be trained to the OSHAHazardous Materials Operations Level; will establish response objectives for the incident, and theHazardous Materials Operations Level Responder will either function as the Incident Commander or inUnified Command, or work under the auspices of an Incident Commander/Unified Command asrequired by law (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 (q)/EPA 40 CFR 311.1).

It is the consensus opinion of the TC that the Operations Level Responder must have the requisite skillto:


1 of 4 5/14/2015 3:39 PM

jdepew

Highlight

• Function as the Incident Commander or in Unified Command and develop incident objectives. Theseobjectives should include identification of:

o Safety precautions required to protect personnel performing the response options while operating atthe hazardous materials site

o The suitability of approved personal protective equipment available to the personnel performing theresponse options

o The potential requirements to have emergency decontamination in place for personnel performing theresponse options

• Function under the authority of an Incident Commander/Unified Command and be capable ofidentifying:

o The intent of the response objectives stated by Incident Command/Unified Command

o The response options available to the Operations Level responder to meet the objectives stated byIncident Command/Unified Command, based upon the scope of the problem.

As the Operations Level Responder will potentially be functioning within an exclusion area outside ofdirect supervision of the Incident Commander/Unified Command, it is the consensus opinion of the TCthat the Operations Level Responder must show competency for the requisite skills identified.

ResponseMessage:



Public Input No. 45-NFPA 1072-2014 [Section No. 5.3 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]




Ballot Results

This item has failed ballot

33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned


5 Affirmative All


0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Negative with Comment


Committee oversight

Carr, H. K.

I believe that this section is in error as far as OSHA's requirements for each level of response and that the TechnicalCommittee should take action to clarify that all Opertions level personnel are not required to be trained to the IncidentCommand level. That the decision to be trained to the highter level of Incident should be determined by the individualreceiving the training and the requirements of the Authority having Jurisdiction.

Coffey, William R.


2 of 4 5/14/2015 3:39 PM

Technical Error in , Section 5.3 - Identify Response Options around Incident Commander

Collins, K. Wade

Should be readdressed by the TC for technical accuracy

D'Onofrio, Cris

The Technical Committee's statement that all Operations Level responders must have the requisite skills to functionas the Incident Commander is incorrect. Not all Operations Level responders have the skills to fucntion as IC.

Edinger, Richard C.

There is an error in the First Draft language regarding incident commander training which was not what I believe thatthe committee intended to describe in the document.

Emery, Richard B.

Rejects the Technical Committee action and allows the Technical Committee to revisit the Public Input as part of theSecond Draft process.

Ingram, Robert J.

changing my vote to negative after further review

Johnson, Kevin W.

Not all responders trained to the Operations Level are necessarily trained to fill the role of incident commander.

Lilley, Troy

The Committee Statement to the Public Comment implied that all emergency responders who are trained to the FirstResponder Operations level also have the skills to serve as the Incident Commander, which is not accurate.

Lindley, Barry

Correct the technical error.

Linsley, Mark E.

FR-17 may contradict NFPA 1001 and should be reviewed again by the TC

McNett, Wayne

reject the Technical Committee’s action which will allow us to revisit that specific Public Input as part of the SecondDraft process and give us a chance to correct our error

Miller, Leslie A.

Need to revise TC's statement to public comment.

Miller, Thomas D.

will allow us to revisit that specific Public Input as part of the Second Draft process and give us a chance to correctour error.

Noll, Gregory G.

Committee justification does not accurately reflect OSHA HAZWOPER interpretation; Committee should revisit theissue.

Porter, John F.

Due to the implication that was made so that it may be sent back for review.


There is a disconnect between this requirement and NFPA 1001 which requires all Fire Fighter I personnel to betrained to the level of Hazardous Materials Operations. Fire Fighter I personnel according to the standard are tooperate under direct supervision and therefore not trained nor tested to the level of assuming command of anyincident. This 1072 will create unsafe practices and is a clear contradiction with 1001.

Rehak, Timothy R.

There is a disconnect between this requirement and NFPA 1001 which requires all Fire Fighter I personnel to betrained to the level of Hazardous Materials Operations. Fire Fighter I personnel according to the standard are tooperate under direct supervision and therefore not trained nor tested to the level of assuming command of anyincident. This 1072 will create unsafe practices and is a clear contradiction with 1001.


I wish to change my ballot on this FR in an effort to correct an inaccurate Technical Committee response during theSecond Draft process.

Schnepp, Rob

Please see changed ballot to enable committee to reconsider

Simpson, Danny G.

Error in submission by technical committee. suggest error be corrected.

Stenner, Robert

In a second draft, need to fix the contradiction between NFPA 1001 and NFPA 1072 as it pertains to Section 5.3 -


3 of 4 5/14/2015 3:39 PM

Identify Response Options.

Terryn, Fred C.

I believe there is an error in the current language that needs to be addressed in the second draft process.

Tracy, Christopher

While Incident Commanders must be trained to the First Responder Operations level, all First Responder Operationsare not qualified to serve as the Incident Commander.

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

While Incident Commanders must be trained to the First Responder Operations level, all First Responder Operationsare not qualified to serve as the Incident Commander

Wright, Charles J.

The Technical Committee will need to address the technical error in the committee response to this issue ... clarifyingthe comment that is being taken to imply that Operations Level Responders need to be trained to the IncidentCommand Level. Without correction, this could cause confusion in the future should someone review the response. Idon't believe that the committee's intention was to imply that Operations Level Responders had to receive IncidentCommander training to satisfy the Operations Level requirements.

Affirmative All

Beckering, Donald

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Hergenreter, Steven

Minson, Matthew



4 of 4 5/14/2015 3:39 PM


5.4* Action Plan Implementation.

Perform assigned tasks at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment with limited potential of contact with hazardous materials/WMD, policies andprocedures, the scope of the incident problem , and approved tools, equipment, and PPE, so thatprotective actions and scene control are established and maintained, incident managementsystem/incident command system (IMS/ICS) is established, evidence is preserved, safety procedures arefollowed, PPE is used in the proper manner, hazards are avoided or minimized, and assignments arecompleted.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Scene control procedures; procedures for protective actions, including evacuationand sheltering-in-place; procedures for ensuring coordinated communications between responders and tothe public; evidence recognition and preservation procedures; IMS/ICS organization and procedures;capabilities, limitations, inspection, donning, working in, doffing, and maintenance of approved PPEaccording to manufacturers' specifications and recommendations; signs and symptoms of heat/coldstress; safety precautions when working at hazardous materials/WMD incidents; and cleaning,disinfecting, and inspecting tools, equipment, and PPE.

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Performing scene control; recognizing and preserving evidence; establishing anIMS/ICS; inspecting, donning, working in, doffing, and maintaining approved PPE; identifying signs ofheat/cold stress; isolating contaminated tools and equipment; and cleaning, disinfecting, and inspectingapproved tools, equipment, and PPE.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is clarifying text to the section and adding annex materials for 5.4(A).

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


78 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


79 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


5.5 Emergency Decontamination.

Perform emergency decontamination at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident that requires emergency decontamination, an assignment, scope of the problem,policies and procedures, and approved tools, equipment, and PPE for emergency decontamination, sothat exposures are protected and minimized, PPE is used in the proper manner, safety procedures arefollowed, hazards are avoided or minimized, and victims and responders are decontaminated.

(A)

Requisite Knowledge. Contamination, cross contamination, and exposure; purpose of decontamination;policies and procedures for emergency decontamination; approved tools and equipment for emergencydecontamination; and hazard avoidance during decontamination.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Preventing spread of contamination during emergency decontamination; avoidinghazards during emergency decontamination; using PPE in the proper manner; and performing emergencydecontamination.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is clarifying the text.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.


80 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


81 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


6.2* Personal Protective Equipment.

Select, don, work in, and doff approved specialized PPE at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident; a mission-specific assignment in an IAP that requires use of PPE; thescope of the incident problem ; response objectives and options for the incident; access to a hazardousmaterials technician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operatingprocedures; approved PPE; and policies and procedures, so that under the guidance of a hazardousmaterials technician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operatingprocedures, approved PPE is selected, inspected, donned, worked in, decontaminated, and doffed; safetyprocedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; and all reports and documentation pertainingto PPE use are completed.

See FR-95

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Policies and procedures for PPE selection and use; importance of working underthe guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, orstandard operating procedures when selecting and using PPE; the capabilities and limitations of andspecialized donning, doffing, and usage procedures for approved PPE; components of an incident actionplan (IAP); procedures for decontamination, inspection, maintenance, and storage of approved PPE;process for going through decontamination being decontaminated while wearing PPE; and procedures forreporting and documenting the use of PPE.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Selecting PPE for the assignment; inspecting, maintaining, storing, donning, working in,and doffing PPE; going through decontamination (emergency and technical) while wearing the PPE; andreporting and documenting the use of PPE.



Annex_A.6.2_A_.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter for clarity and consistency the text needed to be revised.However the TC doesn't agree with PI 56 and the removal of "objectives" to be consistent with FR#17. Additionally the TC agrees with the submitters (PI 5, 33 and 57) to include information regardingPPE, but chooses to place that as Annex material (refer to attachment A.6.2(A).

ResponseMessage:





82 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM




Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


83 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

A.6.2(A) (add after the existing material that is in A.6.2(A) Approved PPE includes describing the types of personnel protective equipment that are available for response based on NFPA standards and the personal protective equipment options for thermal hazards, radiological hazards, asphyxiating hazards, chemical hazards, etiological/biological hazards and mechanical hazards.


6.3* Mass Decontamination.

Perform mass decontamination for ambulatory and nonambulatory victims at a hazardous materials/WMDincident, given a hazardous materials/WMD incident that requires mass decontamination; an assignmentin an IAP; scope of the problem; policies and procedures; approved tools, equipment, and PPE; andaccess to a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, orstandard operating procedures, so that under the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an alliedprofessional, an emergency response plan, or standard operating procedures, a mass decontaminationprocess is selected, set up, implemented, evaluated, and terminated; approved PPE is selected and used;safety procedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; if contaminated, personnel, tools, andequipment are decontaminated; and all reports and documentation of mass decontamination operationsare completed.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; advantages andlimitations of operations and methods of mass decontamination; policies and procedures for performingmass decontamination; approved tools, equipment, and PPE for performing mass decontamination; crowdmanagement techniques; and mass decontamination unit duties within the command structure.

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE; selecting a mass decontamination procedure to minimize thehazard; setting up and implementing mass decontamination operations; evaluating the effectiveness of themass decontamination process; and completing reporting and documentation requirements.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Mar 22 11:48:20 EDT 2015

Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is clarifying text.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl


84 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


85 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


6.4* Technical Decontamination.

Perform technical decontamination in support of entry operations and for ambulatory and nonambulatoryvictims at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMD incident that requirestechnical decontamination; an assignment in an IAP; scope of the problem; policies and procedures fortechnical decontamination; approved tools, equipment, and PPE; and access to a hazardous materialstechnician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operating procedures, so thatunder the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency responseplan, or standard operating procedures, a technical decontamination process is selected, set up,implemented, evaluated, and terminated; approved PPE is selected and used; safety procedures arefollowed; hazards are avoided or minimized; if contaminated, personnel, tools, and equipment aredecontaminated; and all reports and documentation of technical decontamination operations arecompleted.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; importance of workingunder the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency responseplan, or standard operating procedures; advantages and limitations of operations and methods oftechnical decontamination; policies and procedures for performing technical decontamination; approvedtools, equipment, and PPE for performing technical decontamination; crowd management techniques; andtechnical decontamination unit duties within the command structure.

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE; selecting a technical decontamination procedure to minimizethe hazard; setting up and implementing technical decontamination operations; evaluating theeffectiveness of the technical decontamination process; and completing reporting and documentationrequirements.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding clarifying text.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All




86 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


87 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 20-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9 ]

6.5* Evidence Preservation and Public Safety Sampling.

Perform evidence preservation and public safety sampling at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, givena hazardous materials/WMD incident involving potential violations of criminal statutes or governmentalregulations; an assignment in an IAP; scope of the problem; policies and procedures; and approved tools,equipment, and PPE, so that under the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an alliedprofessional, an emergency response plan, or standard operating procedures, forensic evidence ispreserved; public safety samples are taken; under the guidance of law enforcement or the authorityhaving jurisdiction, potential evidence is seized in accordance with approved protocols and techniques;public safety samples are packaged; approved PPE is selected and used, safety procedures are followed,hazards are avoided or minimized; and,if contaminated, emergency responders, tools and equipment aredecontaminated.

(A)

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; importance of workingunder the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency responseplan, or standard operating procedures as well as law enforcement agencies; unique aspects of asuspicious letter, a suspicious package or device, an illicit laboratory, or a release/attack with a WMDagent; potential violations of criminal statutes or governmental regulations; agencies having responseauthority to collect evidence and public safety samples; agencies having investigative law enforcementauthority to collect evidence or public safety samples; notification procedures for agencies havinginvestigative law enforcement authority and hazardous explosive device responsibility; chain-of-custodyprocedures; securing, characterization, and preservation of the scene and potential forensic evidence;approved documentation procedures; types of evidence; use and limitations of equipment to conduct fieldscreening of samples for admission into the Laboratory Response Network or other forensic laboratorysystem; use of collection kits; collection and packaging of public safety samples; decontamination ofpackaging; prevention of secondary contamination; and protection and transportation requirements forsample packaging; and procedures for going through decontamination while wearing PPE .

(B)

Requisite Skills. Identifying incidents with a potential violation of criminal statutes or governmentalregulations; identifying the agency having investigative jurisdiction over an incident that is potentiallycriminal in nature or a violation of government regulations; operating field screening and samplingequipment; securing, characterizing, and preserving the scene; identifying and protecting potentialevidence until it can be collected by an agency with investigative authority; following chain-of-custodyprocedures; characterizing hazards; performing protocols for field screening samples for admission intothe Laboratory Response Network or other forensic laboratory system; protecting evidence fromsecondary contamination; determining agency having response authority to collect public safety samples;determining agency having investigative law enforcement authority to collect evidence and public safetysamples; collecting public safety samples; packaging and labeling samples; decontaminating samples;going through decontamination while wearing PPE ; and preparing samples for protection andtransportation to a laboratory.

6.6* Product Control.

Perform product control techniques with a limited risk of personal exposure at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMD incident with release of product; anassignment in an IAP; scope of the problem; policies and procedures; approved tools, equipment, controlagents, and PPE; and access to a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergencyresponse plan, or standard operating procedures, so that under the guidance of a hazardous materialstechnician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operating procedures, aproduct control technique is selected and implemented, the product is controlled, approved PPE isselected and used, exposures and personnel are protected, safety procedures are followed, hazards areavoided or minimized, and, if contaminated, personnel, tools, and equipment are decontaminated.


88 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; importance of workingunder the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency responseplan, or standard operating procedures; definitions of control, confinement, containment, andextinguishment; policies and procedures; product control techniques for controlling a release with limitedrisk of personal exposure; safety precautions associated with each product control technique; location andoperation of remote/emergency shutoff devices in cargo tanks and at fixed facilities; characteristics andapplicability of approved product control agents; and use of approved tools and equipment andprocedures for going through technical decontamination when wearing PPE .

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE; selecting and performing product control techniques toconfine/contain the release with limited risk of personal exposure; using approved control agents andequipment on a release involving hazardous materials/WMD; using remote control valves and emergencyshutoff devices on cargo tanks and at fixed facilities; and performing product control techniques; andgoing through technical decontamination while wearing PPE .

6.7* Detection, Monitoring, and Sampling.

Perform detection, monitoring, and sampling at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident; an assignment in an IAP; scope of the problem; policies and procedures;approved resources; detection, monitoring, and sampling equipment; PPE; and access to a hazardousmaterials technician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operatingprocedures, so that under the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, anemergency response plan, or standard operating procedures, detection, monitoring, and samplingmethods are selected; approved equipment is selected for detection, monitoring, or sampling of solid,liquid, or gaseous hazardous materials/WMD present; detection, monitoring, and sampling activities areimplemented as needed; approved PPE is selected and used; safety procedures are followed; hazardsare avoided or minimized; exposures and personnel are protected; results of detection, monitoring, andsampling are read, interpreted, recorded, and communicated; if contaminated, personnel and theirequipment are decontaminated; detection, monitoring, and sampling equipment is maintained; and allrequired reports and documentation pertaining to detection, monitoring, and sampling are completed.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; capabilities and limitationsof approved PPE; importance of working under the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, anallied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operating procedures; approved detection,monitoring, and sampling equipment; policies and procedures for detection, monitoring, and sampling;process for selection of detection, monitoring, and sampling equipment for an assigned task; operation ofapproved detection, monitoring, and sampling equipment; capabilities, limitations, and local monitoringprocedures, including action levels and field testing; how to read and interpret results; methods fordecontaminating detection, monitoring, and sampling equipment according to manufacturers'recommendations or local policies and procedures; procedures for going through technicaldecontamination when wearing PPE; maintenance procedures for detection, monitoring, and samplingequipment according to manufacturers' recommendations or local policies and procedures; and requiredreporting and documentation for detection, monitoring, and sampling activities.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE; field testing and operating approved detection, monitoring,and sampling equipment; reading, interpreting, and documenting the readings from detection, monitoring,and sampling equipment; communicating results of detection, monitoring, and sampling; going throughtechnical decontamination; decontaminating detection, monitoring, and sampling equipment; maintainingdetection, monitoring, and sampling equipment according to manufacturers' specifications or local policiesand procedures; and completing required reporting and documentation for detection, monitoring, andsampling activities.

6.8* Victim Rescue and Recovery.


89 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Perform rescue and recovery operations at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident involving exposed and/or contaminated victims; an assignment in an IAP; scopeof the problem; policies and procedures; approved tools, equipment including special rescue equipment,and PPE; and access to a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency responseplan, or standard operating procedures, so that under the guidance of a hazardous materials technician,an allied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operating procedures, the feasibility ofconducting a rescue or a recovery operation is determined; victims are correctly triaged; rescue orrecovery options are selected within the capabilities of available personnel, approved tools, equipment,special rescue equipment, and PPE; victims are rescued or recovered; approved PPE is selected andused; safety procedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; if contaminated, personnel,victims, and equipment used are decontaminated; and all required reports and documentation pertainingto victim rescue and recovery are completed.

(A)

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; capabilities and limitationsof approved PPE; importance of working under the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, anallied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operating procedures; the differencebetween victim rescue and victim recovery; victim triage methods; considerations for determining thefeasibility of rescue or recovery operations; policies and procedures for implementing rescue andrecovery; safety issues; procedures, tactical guidelines, specialized rescue equipment required, andincident response considerations for rescue and recovery in the following situations: (1) line-of-sight withambulatory victims, (2) line-of-sight with nonambulatory victims, (3) non-line-of- sight with ambulatoryvictims, (4) non-line-of-sight with nonambulatory victims, and (5) victim rescue operations versus victimrecovery operations; rescue team positions and their functions; capabilities and limitations of approvedPPE; procedures for going through technical decontamination while wearing PPE; and required reportingand documentation requirements for victim rescue and recovery.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Identifying both rescue and recovery situations; triaging victims; selecting proper rescueor recovery options; using available specialized rescue equipment; selecting and using PPE for the victimand the rescuer; searching for, rescuing, and recovering victims; going through decontamination; andcompleting required reporting and documentation requirements for victim rescue and recovery.

6.9* Response to Illicit Laboratories.

Perform response operations at an illicit laboratory at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident involving an illicit laboratory; an assignment in an IAP; scope of theproblem; policies and procedures; approved tools, equipment, and PPE; and access to a hazardousmaterials technician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, or standard operatingprocedures as well as law enforcement personnel, so that under the guidance of a hazardous materialstechnician, an allied professional, an emergency response plan, standard operating procedures, and lawenforcement personnel, the scene is secured; the type of laboratory is identified; potential hazards areidentified; control procedures are implemented; evidence is preserved; approved PPE is selected andused; safety procedures are followed; exposures and personnel are protected; hazards are avoided orminimized; if contaminated, personnel, victims, tools, and equipment are decontaminated; and all requiredreports and documentation pertaining to illicit laboratory response operations are completed.

See FR-70

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; importance of workingunder the guidance of a hazardous materials technician, an allied professional, an emergency responseplan, or standard operating procedures as well as law enforcement agencies; types of illicit laboratoriesand how to identify them; operational considerations at illicit laboratories; hazards and products at illicitlaboratories; potential booby traps often found at illicit laboratories; law enforcement agencies withinvestigative authority and responsibilities at illicit laboratories; crime coordination with law enforcementagencies; securing and preserving evidence; procedures for conducting a joint hazardousmaterials/hazardous devices site reconnaissance and hazard identification; procedures for determiningatmospheric hazards through detection, monitoring, and sampling; procedures to mitigate immediatehazards; safety procedures and tactics; factors to be considered in the selection of decontamination, inthe selection of detection devices, in the development of a remediation plan, and in decontaminatingtactical law enforcement personnel to include weapons and law enforcement canines ; procedures forgoing through technical decontamination while wearing PPE; and required reporting and documentationrequirements for illicit laboratory response operations.


90 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

(B)

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE; selecting detection, monitoring, and sampling equipment;implementing technical decontamination for personnel; securing an illicit laboratory; going throughtechnical decontamination; identifying and isolating hazards; identifying safety hazards; conducting a jointhazardous materials/hazardous devices operation to mitigate hazards; implementing scene controlprocedures; and completing required reports and documentation pertaining to illicit laboratory responseoperations.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with all the submitters that the for clarity and consistency the text needs to berevised.

However, the TC doesn't agree with PI 59 to add text relative to law enforcement personnel andequipment as it limits the intent of the broader JPR to be "global" to all personnel and equipmentand not specific to one public safety entity for skills requisite, but agrees with the concept of havingthe person be aware of the knowledge aspects related to law enforcement weapons and canines.

ResponseMessage:













Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned


91 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.


Wright, Charles J.

Agree, but 6.9 was not corrected to be consistent with this comment.


92 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


See FR-71

7.2.1 Detection, Monitoring, and Sampling.

Classify hazardous materials/WMD by basic hazard categories and verify the presence andconcentrations of hazardous materials through detection, monitoring, and sampling at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMD incident with released identified andunidentified hazardous materials, an assignment in an incident action plan (IAP), policies and procedures,and approved resources, detection and monitoring equipment, and personal protective equipment (PPE),so that PPE is selected and used; hazardous materials/WMD are classified by their basic hazardcategories; the presence of hazardous materials is verified; the concentrations of hazardous materials inthe atmosphere are determined; samples of solids, liquids, and gases are collected; results of detectionand monitoring equipment are read, interpreted, recorded, and communicated; exposures and personnelare protected; safety procedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; personnel using thedetection and monitoring equipment, as well as the equipment, are decontaminated; field maintenanceand testing are performed; detection and monitoring equipment are maintained; and all reports anddocumentation pertaining to use of detection and monitoring equipment are completed.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Basic hazard categories and their definitions; policies and procedures; monitoringtechnologies; analysis process for classifying the basic hazard categories [e.g., biological, corrosivity,energy (explosivity, radioactivity, reactivity), flammability, oxygen concentration, thermal (heat and cold),and toxicity] of identified solid and liquid materials and unidentified contaminants in the atmosphere;types of detection and monitoring equipment [colormetrics (e.g., tubes, chips, papers, strips, reagents);electrochemical cells (e.g., toxic gas sensors), flammable gas/LEL, noncontact thermal detection device,oxygen concentration, photoionization detector (PID), and radiation detection and monitoring]; process fordetermining radiation dose rates from radioactive material labels; determining background, rate vs dose;determining if a radioactive materials container is leaking/breached by comparing meter readings toTransportation Index (TI); process for monitoring lighter-than-air gases and vapors, heavier-than-airgases and vapors in a confined area, and heavier-than-air gases and vapors in an unconfined area;capabilities and limiting factors of detection and monitoring equipment; detection and monitoringequipment required to identify the basic hazard categories; techniques used to identify unidentifiedcontaminants in the atmosphere ; methods for collecting samples of solids, liquids, and gases; reading,interpreting, recording, and communicating test results of detection and monitoring equipment; and fieldmaintenance and testing procedures for approved detection and monitoring equipment.

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE; classifying determine radiation dose rates from radioactivematerial labels; using each the following types of detection and monitoring equipment [colormetrics (e.g.,tubes, chips, papers, strips, reagents); electrochemical cells (e.g., toxic gas sensors), flammable gas/LEL,noncontact thermal detection device, oxygen concentration, photoionization detector (PID), and radiationdetection and monitoring devices] to either classify hazardous materials by basic hazard category;verifying categories, verify the presence of hazardous materials; determining determine the concentrationof hazardous materials; determining radiation dose rates from radioactive material labels; collecting , takea wipe sample, or collect samples of gases, liquids, and solids; , and monitoring] reading, interpreting,recording, and communicating readings from detection and monitoring equipment; going throughdecontamination while wearing PPE; decontaminating detection and monitoring equipment; performingfield maintenance and testing for detection and monitoring equipment; and completing required reportingand documentation for detection, monitoring, and sampling activities.




Street Address:

City:


93 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees that “Basic Hazard Categories” is subjective. DOT Nine Hazard Classes has adefined description that lists the primary hazard that each class presents. Additionally, the TCrecognized that there are specific detection and monitoring devices that are integral for HMT use.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 111-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. 7.2.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]


Public Input No. 85-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. 7.2.1(A)]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


94 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


95 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.2.2* Hazard and Response Information Collection and Interpretation.

Collect and interpret hazard and response information at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident, an assignment in an IAP, policies and procedures, approvedreference sources, and approved tools and equipment, so that hazard and response information iscollected, interpreted, and communicated.

(A)

Requisite Knowledge. Types, advantages, and limitations of hazard and response information availablefrom approved reference sources; significance and application of hazard and response terms, includingchemical and physical properties, radiation terms, exposure terms (air reactivity, autorefrigeration,biological agent and biological toxin, blood agent, catalyst, chemical change, chemical interactions,compound and mixture, concentration, corrosive (acids, bases, alkaline), critical temperature andpressure, cryogenic liquid heat transfer processes (conduction, convection, radiation, and direct contact),dissociation (acid/base), dose, dose response, endothermic, exothermic, expansion ratio, half-life,halogenated hydrocarbon, inhibitor, instability, ionic and covalent compounds, irritant, maximum safestorage temperature (MSST), melting point and freezing point, miscibility, organic and inorganic, oxidationpotential, pH, physical change, radioactivity, reactivity, riot control agents, saturated and unsaturated(straight and branched) and aromatic hydrocarbons, self-accelerating decomposition temperature(SADT), solubility, solution and slurry, strength, sublimation, temperature of product, vesicants (blisteragents), viscosity, and volatility, as well as a higher level of understanding of operations-level terms:boiling point, fire point, flammable range (LFL and UFL) and explosive range (LEL and UEL), flash point,ignition (autoignition) temperature, persistence, physical state (solid, liquid, gas), polymerization, specificgravity, toxic products of combustion, vapor density, and vapor pressure); principles of heat transferassociated with cryogenic liquid spills; signs and symptoms and target organ effects of exposure tohazardous materials/WMD; methods for determining the pressure and amount of lading in bulkpackaging containers and facility containers; and hazard and response information to be communicated.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Collecting and interpreting hazard and response information; identifying signs andsymptoms of exposure to hazardous materials/WMD, including target organ effects of exposure tohazardous materials/WMD; and determining radiation dose rates from labels attached to radioactivematerials.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC recognizes the submitters request and added specific text to this section. The TC alsomoved the information from the annex material to the main body of the document.

ResponseMessage:



Ballot Results


96 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


97 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.2.3* Assessing Container Condition.

Assess the condition of a container and its closures at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given anincident involving hazardous materials/WMD; an assignment in an IAP; policies and procedures; thescope of the incident, identity of material(s) involved and their hazards, including results of detection,monitoring, and sampling; a container with required markings; and approved resource resources andPPE, so that PPE is selected and used; the container and its closures are inspected; the type of damageto the container and closures is identified; the type of stress on the container is identified; the level of riskassociated with container and closure damage and stress is identified; safety procedures are followed;hazards are avoided or minimized; if contaminated, personnel, tools, and equipment are decontaminated;and a description of the condition of the container and its closures is communicated.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Policies and procedures for assessing container condition; basic design andconstruction features, including closures for bulk and nonbulk containers, fixed facility containers,radioactive material packaging materials containers , and piping and pipelines; process for assessingcontainer damage; types of damage and their level of risk; types of stress; specification markings; andmethods for determining the pressure and quantity of lading remaining in containers.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Assessing the condition of the container and its closures, identifying the type of damageand level of risk associated with the damage, identifying stress(es) on the container, and communicatingthe condition of the container and its closures and the level of risk associated with that condition.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC changed the text for consistency.

Response Message:



Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


98 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


99 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.2.5* Estimating Outcomes.

Estimate the potential outcomes at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, an assignment in an IAP, policies and procedures, results of the incidentanalysis, and approved resources and equipment, so that the concentrations of materials within theendangered area are measured or predicted; physical, health, and safety hazards within the endangeredarea are identified; areas of potential harm in the endangered area are identified; potential outcomeswithin the areas of potential harm in endangered area areas are identified; and potential outcomes arecommunicated.

See FR-100

(A)

Requisite Knowledge. Methods for determining concentrations of materials within the endangered area;methods for identifying physical, health, and safety hazards within the endangered area; health hazardterms and exposure values (counts per minute, kilocounts per minute, intermediately dangerous to lifeand health, incubation period, infectious dose, lethal concentrations, lethal dose, parts per billion, partsper million, permissible exposure limit, radiation absorbed dose, roentgen equivalent man, millirem,microrem, threshold limit value ceiling, threshold limit value short-term exposure limit, threshold limit valuetime weighted average) and their significance in the analysis process; methods for identifying areas ofpotential harm within the endangered area; methods for identifying potential outcomes in the areas ofpotential harm within the endangered area; and procedures for communicating potential outcomes.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Use of approved resources and equipment; measuring and predicting concentrations ofmaterials within the endangered area; identifying the physical, health, and safety hazards within theendangered area; identifying the areas of potential harm in the endangered area; estimating the potentialoutcomes within the areas of potential harm in endangered area areas ; and communicating the potentialoutcomes.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC believes this is information that is important to the main part of the document andend user.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All


100 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Negative with Comment

Wright, Charles J.

Endangered area within this JPR should be singular although others areas are found within the endangered area.


101 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 82-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 7.3.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]

]

Develop and recommend to the incident commander or hazmat officer, response objectives and responseoptions at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMD incident; anassignment in an IAP; results of the incident analysis, including incident-related information, life safetyrisks, environmental risks, and property risks; available resources; and policies and procedures, so thatresponse objectives are identified for the incident and response options are identified for each responseobjective.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC agrees in part with the submitter but believes the action should be different.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.


102 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.


Wright, Charles J.

The term "hazmat" is not used in this document - term should be "hazardous materials"!


103 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.3.2* Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Selection.

Select the PPE ensemble required for a given response option at a hazardous materials/WMD incident,given a hazardous materials/WMD incident, results of the incident analysis, response objectives andoptions for the incident, approved references, and policies and procedures, so that required PPE isidentified for each response option.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge.Four levels of PPE; NFPA PPE standards and certification levels; advantages ofusing certified PPE; levels of PPE; types of PPE available for various hazards; factors to be considered inselecting respiratory protection; factors to be considered in selecting chemical-protective clothing (CPC);significance of degradation, penetration, and permeation on the selection of CPC protective clothing ;indications of material degradation of CPC protective clothing ; different designs of vapor- liquidprotective splash–protective clothing ensembles and splash vapor -protective clothing ensembles andtheir advantages and disadvantages; types, advantages, and disadvantages of heat exchange units usedfor cooling personnel who are wearing PPE; information provided on chemical compatibility charts; andeffects of physiological and psychological stresses on users of PPE.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Selecting PPE ensemble (both respiratory protection and CPC) for a specified responseoption and determining the effectiveness of protective clothing construction material using chemicalcompatibility charts.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC us clarifying text based on other NFPA documents

Response Message:

Public Input No. 77-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. 7.3.2(B)]




Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


104 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


105 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.3.4* Action Plan Development.

Develop a plan of action for a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment in an IAP, results of the incident analysis, response objectives and options for thegiven incident, available resources, and policies and procedures, so that a plan of action is developed, thetasks and resources required to meet the response objectives are identified, specified responseobjectives and response options are addressed, plan is consistent with the emergency response plan andpolicies and procedures, and plan is within the capability of available personnel, PPE, and controlequipment.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Components of an IAP and subplans; definitions of control, confinement,containment, and extinguishment; purpose of, procedures for, required tools and equipment for, and safetyprecautions for various techniques for hazardous materials/WMD (product) control; components of asafety briefing; atmospheric and physical safety hazards associated with hazardous materials/WMD inconfined spaces; pre-entry activities to be performed; and procedures, equipment, and safety precautionsfor preserving and collecting legal evidence.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Preparing an action plan, identifying site safety and control components, identifyingpoints for a safety briefing, identifying pre-entry activities, identifying atmospheric and physical safetyhazards when incident involves a confined space, and preserving and collecting legal evidence.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC added text to clarify the intent.

Response Message:



Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned


106 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


107 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.4.1 Performing Assigned IMS/ICS Duties.

Perform incident management system/incident command system (IMS/ICS) function assigned at ahazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMD incident; an assignment in an IAP;results of the incident analysis, policies and procedures, including an emergency response plan andstandard operating procedures; results of the incident analysis; the IAP; and approved resources, so thatthe assigned functions within the hazardous materials branch or group are completed.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. IMS/ICS organizational structure; responsibilities of hazardous materials branchor group functions; resources available to complete assigned functions; reporting structure; andprocedures for communicating within the hazardous materials branch.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Implement hazardous materials branch or group organization and functions; presenthazardous materials site safety briefing based on the IAP; and communicate observations to hazardousmaterials branch director/group supervisor, ICS operations section chief, or incident commander.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC added text to clarify the intent of the JPR.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.


108 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


109 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.4.2* Personal Protective Equipment Use.

Don, work in, and doff PPE at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment in an IAP, policies and procedures, the results of the incident analysis, responseobjectives and options for the incident, and PPE ensembles as identified in the IAP, so that PPE isselected, inspected, donned, worked in, decontaminated, and doffed; safety procedures are followed;hazards are avoided or minimized; equipment is maintained and stored properly; and the use of PPE isrecorded and reported.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; capabilities, limitations,selection, and use of PPE; components of an IAP; safety procedures for personnel working in CPC PPE ;additional safety concerns of working in the hot zone; procedures for decontamination, maintenance,inspection, and storage of PPE; procedures for being decontaminated while wearing PPE; procedures formaintenance, testing, inspection, and storage of PPE according to manufacturers' specifications or localpolicies and procedures; and forms and procedures for reporting and documenting PPE use.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Inspecting, donning, working in, going through technical decontamination, and doffingPPE liquid splash–protective and vapor-protective–chemical-protective clothing ensembles (includingrespiratory protection) and any other approved specialized personal protective equipment; going throughtechnical decontamination while wearing PPE; completing required reports and documents for the use ofCPC; and repairing and testing of CPC according to manufacturers' specifications or local policies andprocedures PPE .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC agrees with the submitters.

Response Message:





Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



110 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


111 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.4.3.1* Product Control.

Perform product control techniques at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident with release of product, an assignment in an IAP, policies and procedures forproduct control, the results of the incident analysis, response objectives and options for the incident, andapproved tools, equipment, control agents, and PPE, so that an approved product control technique isselected and implemented; the product is controlled; approved PPE is selected and used; exposures andpersonnel are protected; safety procedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; ifcontaminated, personnel, victims, tools, and equipment used are decontaminated; tools and equipmentare inspected and maintained; and all required reports and documentation are completed.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; policies and proceduresfor product control; product control techniques (absorption, adsorption, blanketing, damming, diking,dilution, dispersion, diversion, neutralization, overpacking, patching, plugging, sealing closures, retention,remote valve shutoff, vapor dispersion, and vapor suppression); purpose of, procedures for, required toolsand equipment for, and safety precautions for hazardous materials/WMD control techniques; location andoperation of remote emergency shutoff devices in cargo tanks and at fixed facilities ; characteristics,applicability, and use of approved product control agents; use of approved tools and equipment; andprocedures for inspection and maintenance of tools and equipment.

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE, selecting and using approved control agents and equipmenton a release involving hazardous materials/WMD, using container control valves and remote emergencyshutoff devices on cargo tanks and at fixed facilities , performing product control techniques, andinspecting and maintaining tools and equipment.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC deleted text for consistency. The TC also added text for clarification.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 139-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. 7.4.3.1(B)]


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



112 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


113 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.4.3.2* Controlling Container Leaks.

Control leaks from various containers and their closures at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident; an assignment in an IAP; results of the incident analysis; threescenarios, including a leak from a container or its closures; , a leak from a nonbulk liquid container or itsclosures, and a leak from a bulk or nonbulk pressure liquid container or its closures; policies andprocedures for controlling leaks from containers and/or their closures ; and approved tools, equipment,and PPE, so that an approved product control technique is selected and used; leaks are controlled;approved PPE is selected and used; exposures and personnel are protected; safety procedures arefollowed; hazards are avoided or minimized; hazard monitoring is completed; leaks are controlled(confined or contained); if contaminated, emergency responders, tools, and equipment used aredecontaminated; and tools and equipment are inspected and maintained. ; and all required reports anddocumentation are completed.

(A)*

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used, policies and proceduresfor controlling leaks in nonbulk and radioactive material packaging and ton and intermediate bulkcontainers, product control; types of containers and their closures; , ways in which containers and theirclosures develop leaks, hazards associated with of and safety precautions for controlling;container/closure leaks and ; methods for controlling those leaks, techniques to control container/closureleaks, or closure leaks on non-bulk, intermediate bulk, radioactive, facility containers, and pipes andpipelines; location and operation of remote emergency shutoff devices on cargo tanks and at facilities;characteristics, applicability, and use of approved product control agents; and approved tools andequipment used to control container/closure leaks, ; and equipment procedures for inspection andmaintenance procedures of tools and equipment .

(B)*

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE, selecting and using approved control agents and equipment;controlling leaks on containers and their closures, closing open open (patching, plugging, sealingclosures, remote valve shutoff, closing valves, replacing missing plugs, and tightening loose plugs,following safety procedures, avoiding or minimizing hazards, going through technical decontaminationwhile wearing PPE, fittings); decontaminating tools and equipment; , and inspecting and maintaining toolsand equipment.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC recognized the need to change the text to better reflect the intent of the JPR.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 116-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. 7.4.3.2 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Public Input No. 62-NFPA 1072-2014 [Section No. 7.4.3.2(A)]





114 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


Public Input No. 82-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. 7.4.3.2]




Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


115 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.4.3.3* Overpacking Nonbulk and Radioactive Materials Packaging Containers .

Overpack damaged or leaking packaging nonbulk and radioactive materials containers at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardous materials/WMD incident, an assignment in an IAP, results ofthe incident analysis, a loaded damaged or leaking package container , a suitable overpack container,policies and procedures, and approved tools, equipment, and PPE, so that an approved overpacktechnique is selected; the damaged or leaking package container is placed into a suitable overpack andthe overpack is closed, marked, and labeled; approved PPE is selected and used; exposures andpersonnel are protected; safety procedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; ifcontaminated, emergency responders, tools, and equipment are decontaminated; and tools andequipment are inspected and maintained.

(A)

Requisite Knowledge. Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used, ; policies and proceduresfor overpacking damaged or leaking nonbulk and radioactive materials packaging container , ways inwhich nonbulk and radioactive material packaging materials containers are damaged, ; hazardsassociated with overpacking damaged or leaking nonbulk and radioactive materialspackaging containers; , methods to overpack damaged or leaking nonbulk and radioactive materialspackaging containers , marking and labeling overpack containers, ; the tools and equipment used tooverpack damaged or leaking nonbulk and radioactive materials packaging containers , ; and equipmentand maintenance procedures.

(B)

Requisite Skills. Selecting and using PPE, placing a damaged or leaking nonbulk and radioactivematerials packaging containers into the overpack container, following safety procedures, minimizing andavoiding hazards, decontaminating tools and equipment, and inspecting and maintaining tools andequipment.

7.4.3.4 Liquid Product Transfer.

Transfer liquids from leaking nonpressure containers at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident; an assignment in an IAP; results of the incident analysis; a leakingnonpressure container and a recovery container; policies and procedures for transferring liquids fromleaking nonpressure containers; and approved tools, equipment, and PPE, so that an approved producttransfer method is selected and used; approved PPE is selected and used; exposures and personnelare protected; safety procedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; hazard monitoring iscompleted; the containers are bonded and grounded; product is transferred to the recovery container; ifcontaminated, emergency responders, tools, and equipment used are decontaminated; and tools andequipment are inspected and maintained; and all required reports and documentation are completed.

(A) Requisite Knowledge.

Types of PPE and the hazards for which they are used; policies and procedures for liquid producttransfer; identifying a compatible recovery container; requirements for hazard monitoring; methods fortransferring liquid product; grounding and bonding methods; methods for vapor suppression; use ofapproved tools and equipment; and procedures for inspection and maintenance of tools and equipment.

(B) Requisite Skills: Requisite Skills.

Selecting and using PPE; identifying a compatible recovery container and transfer equipment;monitoring for hazards; grounding and bonding containers; transferring liquid product from a leakingcontainer to a recovery container; suppressing vapors; decontaminating tools and equipment; andinspecting and maintaining tools and equipment.




Street Address:

City:

State:


117 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC is clarifying text for consistency. The TC is adding text to complete the transfer ofproduct.

Response Message:



Public Input No. 83-NFPA 1072-2015 [New Section after 7.4.3.3(B)]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob


118 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


119 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 93-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. 7.4.4.2 [Excluding any

Sub-Sections] ]

Perform Establish and implement technical decontamination in support of entry operations and forambulatory and nonambulatory victims at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident requiring technical decontamination; an assignment in an IAP; policies andprocedures; and approved PPE, tools, and equipment, so that approved PPE is selected and used; atechnical decontamination procedure is selected, set up, implemented, evaluated, and terminated; victimsare decontaminated; safety procedures are followed; hazards are avoided or minimized; if contaminated,personnel, tools, and equipment are decontaminated; and all reports and documentation of technicaldecontamination operations are completed.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Decontamination is a skill that can be performed by hazardous materials operations-levelresponders. In 6.4 of this document, operations-level responders can perform technical decon under"...the guidance of a hazardous materials technician...". It appears if the Technician may be calledinto the role of "guiding" responders in how to perform the function, the higher-order analysis andknowledge are the most important piece. The questions this section should answer is can thetechnician-level responder research and select the appropriate technical decontamination practice,can the process be set-up correctly to minimize secondary contamination and reduce the risk to theresponder, and can it be implemented safely and effectively.

ResponseMessage:





Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned


120 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


121 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 49-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. A.1.1 ]

A.1.1

The committee recognizes that emergency services organizations might have to invest considerableresources to provide the equipment and training needed to respond to incidents involving hazardousmaterials or weapons of mass destruction (WMD) safely and efficiently. The committee does not mean toimply that organizations with limited resources cannot provide response services, only that the individualscharged with responsibilities are qualified to specific levels according to this standard.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC adds this text for consistency.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 117-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. A.1.1]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


122 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


123 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 50-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. A.3.3.1 ]

A.3.3.1 Allied Professional.

Examples could include Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Certified Health Physicist (CHP), CertifiedIndustrial Hygienist (CIH), Radiation Safety Officer (RSO), or similar credentialed or competent individualsas determined by the AHJ. May Might also be referred to as a Technical Specialist of Subject MatterExpert (SME) in a mission-specific area. [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding text to clarify definition.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.


124 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


125 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 52-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. A.3.3.16.2 ]

A.3.3.16.2 Mass Decontamination.

Mass decontamination is initiated where the number of victims and time constraints do not allow theestablishment of an in-depth decontamination process. Mass decontamination is a gross decontaminationprocess utilizing large volumes of low-pressure water to reduce the level of contamination. Asoap-and-water solution or universal decontamination solution would be more effective; however,availability of such solutions in sufficient quantities cannot always be ensured. [ 472, 2013]

Extensive research into mass decontamination operations at terrorist incidents involving hazardousmaterials and chemical warfare agents has been conducted by the U.S. Army's Research, Development,and Engineering Command (RDECOM), and the resulting guidelines and documents are available on theInternet. [ 472, 2013]

Mass decontamination should be established quickly to reduce the harm being done to the victims by thecontaminants. Initial operations will likely be through handheld hose lines or master streams supplied fromfire apparatus while a more formal process is being set up. Examples of mass decontamination methodsare the ladder pipe decontamination system and the emergency decontamination corridor system, both ofwhich are described in RDECOM's guidelines. [ 472, 2013] A formal technical decontamination might benecessary if it is determined through detection, observation, or concern that the initial emergencydecontamination was not effective. For example, this could be the case for victims exposed to aradiological dispersal device (RDD) or an aerosolized biologic agent.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding this text for consistency.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 72-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. A.3.3.16.2]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl


126 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


127 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.3.3.28 Fissile Material.

Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations define fissile material as plutonium-239,plutoniun plutonium -242, uranium-233, uranium-235, or any combination of these radionuclides. Thismaterial is usually transported with additional shipping controls that limit the quantity of material in any oneshipment. Packaging Containers used for fissile material is designed and tested to prevent a fissionreaction from occurring during normal transport conditions as well as hypothetical accident conditions.[ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is changes text for consistency.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


128 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


129 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.3.3.35 Hazardous Materials Safety Officer.

This individual might also serve as a technical specialist for incidents that involve hazardousmaterials/WMD. The National Incident Management System (NIMS) identifies this person as the AssistantSafety Officer — Hazardous Material.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding text to clarify the HM position.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 21-NFPA 1072-2014 [Section No. A.3.3.36]


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


130 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


131 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 55-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections A.3.3.44.1, A.3.3.47 ]

See FR-34

A.3.3.47 Packaging.

Packaging for hazardous materials includes bulk and nonbulk packaging. [ 472, 2013]

A.3.3.47.1 Bulk Packaging.

Bulk packaging can be either placed on or in a transport vehicle or vessel or constructed as an integralpart of the transport vehicle. [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is deleting these annex items and related definitions for this section.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


132 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


133 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.3.3.47.1 Emergency Response Plan (ERP).

Emergency response plans can be developed at organizational, and governmental levels ( agency, local,state, provincial, territorial, tribal , and federal levels) . [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adds text to clarify the definition.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


134 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


135 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 57-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Sections A.3.3.54.1, A.3.3.54.2, A.3.3.54.3,

A.3.3.54.4, A.... ]

A.3.3.50.1 Chemical-Protective Clothing (CPC).

Chemical-protective clothing (garments) can be constructed as a single- or multi-piece multi-piecegarment. The garment can completely enclose the wearer either by itself or in combination with thewearer's respiratory protection, attached or detachable hood, gloves, and boots. [472, 2013]

A.3.3.50.2 High Temperature–Protective Clothing.

This type of clothing is usually of limited use in dealing with chemical commodities. [472, 2013]

A.3.3.50.3 Liquid Splash–Protective Clothing Ensembles .

This type of protective clothing is a component of EPA Level B chemical protection. Liquid splash–protective clothing Ensembles should meet the requirements of NFPA 1992, Standard on Liquid Splash–Protective Ensembles and Clothing for Hazardous Materials Emergencies . [ 472 , 2013]

A.3.3.50.4 Structural Fire-Fighting Protective Clothing.

Structural fire-fighting protective clothing provides limited protection from heat but might not provideadequate protection from the harmful gases, vapors, liquids, or dusts that are encountered duringhazardous materials/WMD incidents. [ 472, 2013] The NFPA 1971 CBRN option is intended to addchemical protection to structural fire-fighting protective clothing.

A.3.3.50.5 Vapor-Protective Clothing Ensembles .

This type of protective clothing is a component of EPA Level A chemical protection. Vapor-protectiveclothing should meet the requirements of NFPA 1991 or NFPA 1994 . [ 472, 2013]

A.3.3.52 Respiratory Protection.

Respiratory protection is divided into three types:

(1) Positive pressure self Self -contained breathing apparatus (should meet the requirements of NFPA1981 , which also incorporates the Statement of Standard for NIOSH CBRN SCBA Testing)

(2) Positive pressure Supplied air-line respirators

(3) Powered air-purifying respirators (should meet the Statement of Standard for NIOSH CBRN PAPRTesting)

(4) Air-purifying respirators (should meet the Statement of Standard for NIOSH CBRN APR Testing)

[ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is changing the text for consistency.

Response Message:



Ballot Results


136 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.


Wright, Charles J.

Presentation of protective clothing needs to be consistent CPC includes Liquid ensembles and vapor ensemblesand these ensembles should be included as subsets of CPC.


137 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.3.3.64 Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD).

The source of this definition is 18 USC 2332a. [472, 2013]

Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) are known by many different abbreviations and acronyms, the mostcommon of which is CBRN, which is the acronym for chemical, biological, and radiological/nuclear, andexplosives particulate agents that could be released as the result of a terrorist attack. CBRN agents arefurther categorized as follows:

(1) Chemical terrorism agents are materials used to inflict lethal or incapacitating casualties, generallyon a civilian population, and include chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals:

(a) Chemical warfare agents are solid, liquid, gaseous, and vapor agents, including, but not limitedto, GB (Sarin), GD (Soman), HD (sulfur mustard), and VX.

(b) Toxic industrial chemicals include chlorine and ammonia, which have been identified as masscasualty threats.

(2) Biological terrorism agents are liquid or particulate agents that can consist of a biologically derivedtoxin or pathogen to inflict lethal or incapacitating casualties, such as bacteria, viruses, or the toxinsderived from biological material.

(3) Radiological particulate terrorism agents are particles that emit ionizing radiation in excess of normalbackground levels used to inflict lethal or incapacitating casualties, generally on a civilian population,as the result of a terrorist attack.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC agrees with submitter and has added text.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


138 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.


Wright, Charles J.

Need to clean up explanation of CBRN or CBRNE for accuracy CBRN does not include explosives as statedwhile CBRNE does.


139 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 60-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. A.3.3.67.2.1 ]

A.3.3.64.2.2 Radiation Exposure Device (RED).

Sealed source means radioactive material encased in a capsule or closely bonded to another material inorder to contain the radioactive material and prevent its leakage or escape under normal conditions ofintended use. Radioactive material may be in a sealed or unsealed (dispersible) form. Shipments ofsealed and dispersible forms of radioactive material are made in accordance with Department ofTransportation regulations in a variety of packaging containers dependent on the physical and chemicalform of the material, quantity of radioactive material present, and associated radiation levels on theexterior of the packaging container . [ 472, 2013]

An RED might cause a few deaths but normally would not cause widespread radiological contamination.An RED could be concealed in public transportation (under a bus or subway seat), a busy shopping mall(e.g., the food court), a movie theater, or any other location where a large number of people sit, stand, orpass close by. Individuals who come in contact with, touch, or sit on a radioactive material container donot become contaminated. The danger is from exposure for extended periods of time to high levels ofradiation close to the radioactive material or generating device. If an RED contains radioactivematerial materials and the device were to break open, some of the radioactive material could be released,causing contamination. If that occurs, the RED becomes a radiological dispersal device (RDD), andpeople coming in contact with the radioactive material could spread contamination elsewhere.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC changed the text for consistency.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


140 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


141 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.3.3.64.2 Improvised Nuclear Device (IND) .

The nuclear explosion from an IND produces extreme heat, powerful shockwaves, and prompt radiationthat would be acutely lethal for a significant distance. It also produces potentially lethal radioactive fallout,which may spread and deposit over very large areas. It also produces potentially lethal radioactive fallout,which may spread and deposit over very large areas. A nuclear detonation in an urban area could resultin over 100,000 fatalities (and many more injured), massive infrastructure damage, and thousands ofsquare kilometers of contaminated land. If the IND fails to work correctly and does not create a nuclearexplosion, then the detonation of the conventional explosives would likely disperse radioactive materiallike an explosive radiological dispersal device (RDD). [ 472, 2013]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC has added text to clarify the definition.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.


142 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


143 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.4.2

At the awareness level, approved resources include the ERG or an equivalent guide; manufacturer,shipper, and transporter/ carrier documents (including shipping papers) and contacts; the U.S.DOT, Hazardous Materials Marking, Labeling and Placarding Guide; and safety data sheets (SDS).

In transportation, the name, placard applied, or identification number of the material provides access toinformation in the ERG or an equivalent document.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with submitter that the change should occur for consistency with standardlisting throughout document.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris


144 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


145 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 62-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. A.4.2(A) ]

A.4.2(A)

Instructors should include indicators of terrorist attacks and other potentials, emphasizing that “if you cansmell it, taste it, or feel it, you are now (or might be) part of the problem.”

While this is a minimum requirement, the AHJ has the option to select additional information from theoperations chapter (Chapter 5) regarding container and hazard information as necessary, based on localconditions and circumstances.

Awareness level personnel should be able to match the hazard classes and divisions with the primaryhazards and examples.

Indicators of the presence of hazardous materials include occupancy and locations, including fixedfacilities and transportation; container shape (general shape of the container); container owner/operatorsignage; placards and labels; markings, including NFPA 704 markings, military markings, transportationmarkings such as identification number marks, marine pollutant marks, elevated temperature marks,commodity markings, inhalation hazard marks, and pipe and pipeline markings and colors; shippingdocuments and SDS; and sensory clues (dead birds or fish, color of vapors, unusual odors, etc. sheen,hissing noise, dead vegetation , etc. ). Other items, such as fume hood exhaust stacks and vents on theexterior of a building, could indicate hazardous materials and can be identified in advance throughpre-incident survey activities.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the submitter that additional examples of sensory clues and additional typeclue for the presence of hazardous materials (signage/markers) helps to clarify the text.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 122-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. A.4.2(A)]


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


146 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


147 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.4.3

People not directly involved in emergency response operations should be kept away from the hazardarea, and control should be established over the area of operations. Unprotected emergency respondersshould not be allowed to enter the isolation zone.

At the awareness level, approved resources reference sources include the ERG or an equivalent guide;manufacturer, shipper, and transporter/ carrier documents (including shipping papers) and contacts; andsafety data sheets ( SDS) .




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The stem of the JPR specifies "approved reference sources" so it seems logical for the Annex touse the term "approved reference sources" rather than approved documents when listing whatthese items are. May reduce some confusion.

ResponseMessage:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.


148 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


149 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.4.3(A)

Basic Recommended precautions found on numbered guides in the ERG include public safety issues;recommended protective clothing; evacuation, ; emergency response to fire, spill, and leak; and first aidsections.

Examples of required knowledge include precautions for providing emergency medical care to victims;typical ignition sources; ways hazardous materials/WMD are harmful to people, the environment, andproperty; general routes of entry for human exposure; emergency action (fire, spill, or leak; first aid);protective recommended actions not to be performed (i.e., closing of pipeline valves); protective actions( isolation of area and denial of entry, evacuation, shelter-in-place); size and shape of recommended initialisolation and protective action distances; difference between small and large spills; conditions requiringthe use of the Table of Initial Isolation and Protective Action Distances, which is found in the ERG, and theisolation distances in the numbered guide in the ERG; techniques for isolating the hazard area anddenying entry to unauthorized persons; how to recognize and protect evidence; and use of approved toolsand equipment.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

Included a key element of response to pipeline incidents that can reduce possibly expanding adisaster or creating a worse condition - shutting a pipeline valve.

ResponseMessage:



Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl


150 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


151 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.5.2 Approved reference sources.

At the operations level, resources approved reference sources should include a minimum of ERG, SDS,and CHEMTREC, CANUTEC, and SETIQ; local, state, and governmental authorities; and manufacturer,shipper, and transporter/ carrier documents (including shipping papers) and contacts.

Surrounding conditions include topography; land use, including utilities and fiber-optic cables;accessibility; weather condition conditions ; bodies of water, including recharge ponds; public exposurepotential; patient presentation; overhead and underground wires and pipelines; storm and sewer drains;possible ignition sources; adjacent land use such as rail lines, highways, and airports; and the nature andextent of injuries. Building information, such as floor drains, ventilation ducts, and air returns, also shouldbe included where appropriate.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is changing text for consistency.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.


152 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


153 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM



154 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

A.5.2(A)


155 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

At the operations level, responders should be able to recognize the following containers and identify themby name: rail tank cars (pressure, nonpressure, and cryogenic tank cars); highway cargo tanks(compressed gas tube trailers, corrosive liquid tanks, cryogenic tanks, dry bulk cargo tanks, high- pressuretanks, low- pressure chemical tanks, and nonpressure liquid tanks); UN portable tanks/intermodal tanks(nonpressure, pressure, cryogenic, and tube modules); storage tanks (nonpressure, pressure, andcryogenic storage tanks); piping and pipelines; intermediate bulk containers (IBC) and ton containers;radioactive materials packages (excepted, industrial, Type A, and Type B packages); and nonbulkpackaging containers (bags, carboys, cylinders, drums, and Dewar flasks for cryogenic liquids).

In an effort to ensure that operations level personnel also understand how to obtain information pertainingto a pipeline-involved incident, line markers or pipeline markers are added to supplement the list ofinformation sources. In a pipeline incident, the pipeline markers would be the source of information usedsince no shipping papers, placards, UN numbers, or other information would be available.

Hazardous materials incident survey information includes location, weather conditions, topography,populated buildings, bodies of water, other buildings, remedial actions taken, container/package, contents,release, container damage, time of day, and other factors that help determine the scope of the problem.

Physical and chemical properties. Predicting behavior of hazardous materials/WMD relies onunderstanding certain characteristics of the material. Information identifying the following characteristicsshould be collected and interpreted: boiling point, chemical reactivity, corrosivity (pH), flammable(explosive) range [LFL (LEL) and UFL(UEL)], flash point, ignition (autoignition) temperature, particle size,persistence, physical state (solid, liquid, gas), radiation (ionizing and nonionizing), specific gravity, toxicproducts of combustion, vapor density, vapor pressure, and water solubility.

Identifying hazards. The process for predicting/identifying the behavior of a hazardous material/WMD andits container under emergency conditions is based on the simple concepts that containers of hazardousmaterials/WMD under stress can open up and allow the contents to escape. This content release will varyin type and speed. A dispersion pattern will be formed by the escaping product, potentially exposingpeople, the environment, or property to physical and/or health hazards.

This overall concept for identifying the likely behavior of a container and its contents under emergencyconditions is often referred to as a general behavior model. The general behavior model considers thetype of stress on the container involved and the potential type of breach, release, dispersion pattern,length of contact, and the health and physical hazards associated with the material and its container, asfollows:

(1) Stress. The three types of stress that could cause a container to release its contents are thermalstress, mechanical stress, and chemical stress.

(2) Breach. The five ways in which containers can breach are disintegration, runaway cracking, closuresopening up, punctures, and splits or tears.

(3) Release. The four ways in which containment systems can release their contents are detonation,violent rupture, rapid relief, and spill or leak.

(4) Dispersion. Seven dispersion patterns can be created upon release of agents: hemisphere, cloud,plume, cone, stream, pool, and irregular.

(5) Contact. The three general time frames for predicting the length of time that an exposure can be incontact with hazardous materials/WMD in an endangered area are short term (minutes and hours),medium term (days, weeks, and months), and long term (years and generations).

(6) Hazards. The seven health and physical hazards that could cause harm in a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident are thermal, mechanical, poisonous, corrosive, asphyxiating, radiological,and etiologic.

Identifying outcomes. At the operations core level, the process for identifying the potential harm andassociated outcomes within an endangered area at a hazardous materials/WMD incident includesidentifying the size and shape of the endangered area, the number of exposures (people, property,environment, and major systems) within the endangered area, and the physical, health, and safetyhazards within the endangered area determined from approved resources.

Resources for determining the size of an endangered area of a hazardous materials/WMD incident are thecurrent edition of the ERG and plume dispersion modeling results from facility pre-incident plans.

The factors for determining the extent of physical, health, and safety hazards within an endangered areaat a hazardous materials/WMD incident are victim presentation (including nonclinical indicators or clues of


156 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

a material's presence), surrounding conditions, indication of the behavior of the hazardous materials andits container, and the degree of hazard.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew


157 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


158 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.5.3

At the operations level, resources approved information sources should include a minimum of ERG; SDS;CHEMTREC, CANUTEC, or SETIQ; local, state, and governmental authorities; and manufacturers',shippers', and transporters'/ carriers' documents (shipping papers) and contacts.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: Consistent use of terminology.

Response Message:


Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.


159 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


160 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.5.4

Protective actions include isolating the hazard area, denying entry, evacuation, and shelter-in-place.

Scene control includes establishing control zones, performing emergency decontamination, andcommunicating to the public.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is moving text to subsection.

Response Message:



Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


161 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


162 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.6.2

At this level, PPE refers to personal protective equipment that would be used in situations where contactwith hazardous materials/WMD is possible or expected. Such equipment can include chemical-protectiveclothing, bomb suits, respirators, or other equipment that typically would not be worn by operations levelresponders. Specialized PPE also refers to operations level responders' PPE that requires changes todonning, doffing, and usage procedures — for example, taping gaps in fire-fighter protective clothing,doffing in a decontamination corridor, or working in the hot zone as a member of a buddy system.Personnel should be able to describe the types of PPE available and the options for thermal hazards,radiological hazards, asphyxiation hazards, chemical hazards, etiological/biological hazards, andmechanical hazards. (See also A.6.1.5.)




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is clarifying text.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris


163 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


164 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.6.2(A)

Limitations of PPE include permeation, penetration, and degradation of protective clothing and limitationsof respiratory protective equipment, such as air-purifying respirators.

Requisite knowledge includes the ability to describe the types of PPE that are available for responsebased on NFPA standards and the PPE options for thermal hazards, radiological hazards, asphyxiatinghazards, chemical hazards, etiological/biological hazards, and mechanical hazards.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC recognizes that additional material for clarification is needed for the annex.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven


165 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


166 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.6.9(A)

Types of illicit laboratories include chemical, biological, explosive, and drug manufacturing. Booby trapsfound at illicit laboratories include anti-personnel devices. Clearance of such devices is carried out byexplosive ordnance disposal (EOD) personnel trained for these procedures.

Law enforcement agencies having investigative jurisdiction might differ based on whether the situationinvolves illicit drug manufacturing, illicit WMD manufacturing, or environmental crimes resulting from illicitlaboratory operations. Law enforcement jurisdiction, investigative guidelines, and investigative prioritiesare complex and dynamic. Specific jurisdictional situations should be identified with local, state, andfederal investigative agencies such as the FBI, DEA, United States Postal Inspection Service, andEPA governmental investigative agencies .

Considerations for decontaminating tactical law enforcement personnel include being aware of specializedequipment used by law enforcement, including weapons; ammunition; concussion devices; persons incustody; procedures for securing evidence, weapons, and ammunition; and coordination to ensure a safeoperating zone.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is using clarifying text.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald


167 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


168 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.7.2.1

Basic categories of hazardous materials include biological potential, corrosivity, flammability, oxidationpotential, oxygen deficiency, radioactivity, thermal energy, and toxic potential.

Detection and monitoring equipment, test strips, and reagents include biological indicator, colorimetricindicators (colorimetric detector tubes) and indicating papers (pH, potassium iodide-starch, fluoride, andwater finding), combustible gas indicator, electrochemical cells (carbon monoxide meter, oxygen meter),metal oxide sensor, pH indicators, pH meters, photoionization detectors, radiation detection andmeasurement instruments, reagents, thermal detector (e.g., infrared thermometer and thermal imager),and other approved equipment.

A.7.2.1(A)

The committee determined that the basic hazard categories [corrosivity, energy (explosivity,radioactivity, reactivity), flammability, oxygen concentration, thermal (heat and cold), and toxicity] arecore components of a hazardous materials technician's requisite knowledge. The technical committeewanted to specify the hazard categories to eliminate any potential ambiguity.

A.7.2.1(B)

All hazardous materials technicians must be able to protect themselves and the public from basiceveryday response hazards. Therefore, the committee determined that all hazardous materialstechnicians must have the knowledge and skills necessary to operate each of the following pieces ofdetection and monitoring equipment: colorimetrics (e.g., tubes, chips, papers, strips,reagents);electrochemical cells (e.g., toxic gas sensors), flammable gas/LEL noncontact thermaldetection, oxygen concentration, and photoionization detector (PID) devices; and radiation detectionand monitoring devices.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC added this text to clarify for consistency and eliminate any potential ambiguity.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention


169 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


170 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.7.2.2

Approved reference sources beyond the ERG and SDS, to should include hazardous materials computerdatabases; information obtained from detection, monitoring, and sampling activities; reference manuals;technical information centers, including CHEMTREC, CANUTEC, or SETIQ; local, state, andfederal governmental authorities; and technical information specialists.

Equipment includes monitoring and detection equipment, computers, printers, communication equipment,and so forth.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC adding clarifying text for consistency.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


171 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


172 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 79-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. A.7.2.2(A) ]

A.7.2.2(A)

Hazard and response terms at this level include new terms: air reactivity, autorefrigeration, biologicalagent and biological toxin, blood agent, catalyst, chemical change, chemical interactions, compoundand mixture, concentration, corrosive (acids, bases, alkaline), critical temperature and pressure,cryogenic liquid heat transfer processes (conduction, convection, radiation, and direct contact),dissociation (acid/base), dose, dose response, endothermic, exothermic, expansion ratio, half-life,halogenated hydrocarbon, inhibitor, instability, ionic and covalent compounds, irritant, maximum safestorage temperature (MSST), melting point and freezing point, miscibility, organic and inorganic,oxidation potential, pH, physical change, radioactivity, reactivity, riot control agents, saturated andunsaturated (straight and branched) and aromatic hydrocarbons, self-accelerating decompositiontemperature (SADT), solubility, solution and slurry, strength, sublimation, temperature of product,vesicants (blister agents), viscosity, and volatility, as well as a higher level of understanding ofoperations-level terms: boiling point, fire point, flammable range (LFL and UFL) and explosive range(LEL and UEL), flash point, ignition (autoignition) temperature, persistance, physical state (solid, liquid,gas), polymerization, specific gravity, toxic products of combustion, vapor density, and vapor pressure.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC recognizes the need to ensure that all this information is addressed and notneglected by leaving as annex material.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All



173 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


174 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.7.2.3

The condition of a container can be damaged with no product release, undamaged with no productrelease, damaged with product release, and undamaged with product release.

Containers include bulk, nonbulk, fixed bulk facility containers, radioactive material packaging materialscontainers , and pipelines and piping, as well as their closures.

Required markings include specification markings for bulk transportation containers, including tank cars(cryogenic liquid, nonpressure, pneumatically unloaded covered hopper cars, and pressure), intermodaltanks/UN portable tanks (nonpressure, pressure, cryogenic liquid, and tube modules), and cargo tanks(compressed gas tube trailers, corrosive liquid, cryogenic liquid, dry bulk, high highpressure,low-pressure chemical, and nonpressure liquid).

Approved resources include printed and technical resources, computer databases, and specialists in thefield.

Types of damage to containers include cracks, scores, gouges, dents, closures problems (closures notsecure, worn, damaged, or missing), and structural damage to container.

Types of stress on containers include thermal, mechanical, and chemical.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC changed text for consistency.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


175 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


176 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.7.2.5(A)

Health hazard terms and exposure values include counts per minute (cpm) and kilocounts per minute(kcpm), immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH) value, incubation period, infectious dose, lethalconcentrations (LC 50 ), lethal dose (LD 50 ), parts per billion (ppb), parts per million (ppm), permissible

exposure limit (PEL), radiation absorbed dose (rad), roentgen equivalent man (rem), millirem (mrem),microrem (µrem), threshold limit value ceiling (TLV-C), threshold limit value short-term exposure limit(TLV-STEL), and threshold limit value time-weighted average (TLV-TWA). [See also A.5.2(A) .]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC deleted this section as it is explained in the main section of the document.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.


177 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


178 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.7.3.2

PPE ensembles include both respiratory protection and liquid splash–protective clothing ensembles ,vapor-protective clothing, high temperature–protective clothing ensembles , and structural fire-fightingprotective clothing.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC changed the text for consistency with other documents.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

31 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.


179 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.


Wright, Charles J.

7.3.2 seems to address CPC, so why address HTPC and SFFPC. vapor-protective clothing should be vapor-protective ensembles


180 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


A.7.3.2(A)

Levels of protection specified by the EPA and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH) OSHA/EPA are Level A, Level B, Level C, and Level D with explanations.Table A.7.3.2(A)cross-references the OSHA/EPA Level with the NFPA PPE Standards.

Table A.7.3.2(A) Ensemble Description

Ensemble Description Using Performance-Based Standard(s) OSHA/EPA Level

NFPA 1991 worn with NFPA 1981 SCBA A

NFPA 1992 work with NFPA 1981 SCBA B

NFPA 1994 Class 2 worn with NFPA 1981 SCBA B

NFPA 1994 Class 3 work with NFPA 1981 SCBA C

NFPA 1994 Class 3 work with NIOSH CBRN PAPR C

NFPA 1994 Class 3 work with NIOSH CBRN APR C

Hazards include thermal, radiological, asphyxiating, chemical (liquids and vapors), etiological (biological),and mechanical (explosives).



FR-75_Table_A.7.3.2_A_.docx




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding text for consistency from a combination of several NFPA documents.

Response Message:

Public Input No. 125-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. A.7.3.2(A)]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All




181 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


182 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

FR-75, new table

Table A.7.3.2(A)

Ensemble Description Using Performance-Based Standard(s) OSHA/EPA Level

NFPA 1991 worn with NFPA 1981 SCBA A

NFPA 1992 work with NFPA 1981 SCBA B

NFPA 1994 Class 2 worn with NFPA 1981 SCBA B

NFPA 1994 Class 3 work with NFPA 1981 SCBA C

NFPA 1994 Class 3 work with NIOSH CBRN PAPR C

NFPA 1994 Class 3 work with NIOSH CBRN APR C


A.7.4.3.2

Containers include nonbulk packaging containers (bags, barrels, bottles, boxes, jerry cans, pails, drums,and cylinders, including UN pressure receptacles and “y” cylinders), ton containers, intermediate bulkcontainers (FIBCs and RIBCs), and radioactive material packaging radioactive materials containers(excepted, ; industrial, Type A, Type B).

Closures include valves, pressure relief devices (pressure relief valves, rupture disks discs , fusibleplugs), manways, flanged fittings, screwed caps, plugs, packing glands, drum bungs, and drum lids.

Leaks include punctures (nail holes, fork truck punctures); rips, tears, splits, cracks, and ruptures; chimeleaks; and leaking closures [screwed fitting leaks (bung leaks), open valves, missing plugs, packing glandleaks, flange leaks, gasket leaks, blown rupture discs].




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade


183 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


184 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 3-NFPA 1072-2015 [ New Section after B.5 ]

Annex D National Fallen Firefighters Foundation

D.1 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives

This annex is not a part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informationalpurposes only.

In 2004, the NFFF held an unprecedented gathering of the fire service leadership when more than 200individuals assembled in Tampa, Florida to focus on the troubling question of how to prevent line-of-dutydeaths and injuries. Every year approximately 100 fire fighters lose their lives in the line of duty in theUnited States; about one every 80 hours. Every identifiable segment of the fire service was representedand participated in the Summit.

The first Firefighter Life Safety Summit marked a significant milestone, because it not only gathered allthe segments of the fire service behind a common goal but it also developed the “16 Firefighter LifeSafety Initiatives.” The summit attendees agreed that the “16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives” serve asa blueprint to reduce line–of–duty deaths and injuries. In 2014, a second Life Safety Summit was heldand more than 300 fire service leaders gathered. At the second Firefighter Life Safety Summit, the “16Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives” were reaffirmed as being relevant to reduce line–of–duty deaths andinjuries.

NFFF “16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives.”

(1) Define and advocate the need for a cultural change within the fire service relating to safety;incorporating leadership, management, supervision, accountability and personal responsibility.

(2) Enhance the personal and organizational accountability for health and safety throughout the fireservice.

(3) Focus greater attention on the integration of risk management with incident management at alllevels, including strategic, tactical, and planning responsibilities.

(4) All fire fighters must be empowered to stop unsafe practices.

(5) Develop and implement national standards for training, qualifications, and certification (includingregular recertification) that are equally applicable to all fire fighters based on the duties they areexpected to perform.

(6) Develop and implement national medical and physical fitness standards that are equallyapplicable to all fire fighters, based on the duties they are expected to perform.

(7) Create a national research agenda and data collection system that relates to the initiatives.

(8) Utilize available technology wherever it can produce higher levels of health and safety.

(9) Thoroughly investigate all fire fighter fatalities, injuries, and near misses.

(10) Grant programs should support the implementation of safe practices and/or mandate safepractices as an eligibility requirement.

(11) National standards for emergency response policies and procedures should be developed andchampioned.

(12) National protocols for response to violent incidents should be developed and championed.

(13) Fire fighters and their families must have access to counseling and psychological support.

(14) Public education must receive more resources and be championed as a critical fire and life safetyprogram.

(15) Advocacy must be strengthened for the enforcement of codes and the installation of home firesprinklers.

(16) Safety must be a primary consideration in the design of apparatus and equipment.



185 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM



Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the principles and concepts associated with NFFF 16 Fire Fighter Life SafetyInitiatives. However the TC recognizes that it is unsure where in the document to best place eitherthe whole or part of the Initiatives. It is recognized that this is a Correlating Committee on Pro-Qualitem that needs further consideration. For now the TC is placing it as a separate annex item. Referto FR 4 (PI 75) in Annex C.

ResponseMessage:



Public Input No. 74-NFPA 1072-2015 [Chapter A [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne


186 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


187 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 94-NFPA 1072-2015 [ New Section after B.5 ]

Annex C An Overview of JPRs for Hazardous Materials/WMD Response Personnel

This annex is not part of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for informationalpurposes only.


188 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

C.1 Hazardous Materials/WMD Response Personnel.


189 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

The matrices shown in Table C.1 are included to provide the user of the standard with an overview ofthe JPRs and the progression of the various levels found in the document. They are intended to assistthe user of the document with the implementation of the requirements and the development of trainingprograms using the JPRs.

Table C.1 Overview of JPRs for Hazardous Materials/WMD Response Personnel

Awareness Operations Technician

4.2 Recognize andidentify the hazardousmaterials/WMD andhazards involved in ahazardousmaterials/WMDincident, given ahazardousmaterials/WMDincident, an assignment,and approved referencesources, so that thepresence of hazardousmaterials/WMD isrecognized and thematerials and theirhazards are identified.

5.2 Identify the scope of theproblem at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, givena hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment,policies and procedures, andapproved reference sources,so that container types,materials, location of anyrelease, and surroundingconditions are identified,hazard information iscollected, the potentialbehavior of a material and itscontainer is identified, and thepotential hazards, harm, andoutcomes associated with thatbehavior are identified.

7.2.1 Classify hazardous materials/WMD byand verify the presence and concentrations ofhazardous materials through detection,monitoring, and sampling at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident with releasedidentified and unidentified hazardousmaterials, an assignment in an incident actionplan (IAP), policies and procedures, andapproved resources, detection and monitoringequipment, and personal protective equipment(PPE), so that PPE is selected and used;hazardous materials/WMD are classified bytheir basic hazard categories; the presence ofhazardous materials is verified; theconcentrations of hazardous materials in theatmosphere are determined; samples ofsolids, liquids, and gases are collected; resultsof detection and monitoring equipment areread, interpreted, recorded, andcommunicated; exposures and personnel areprotected; safety procedures are followed;hazards are avoided or minimized; personnelusing the detection and monitoring equipment,as well as the equipment, are decontaminated;field maintenance and testing are performed;detection and monitoring equipment aremaintained; and all reports and documentationpertaining to use of detection and monitoringequipment are completed.

4.3 Isolate the hazardarea and deny entry ata hazardousmaterials/WMDincident, given ahazardousmaterials/WMDincident, an assignment,policies andprocedures, andapproved referencesources, so that theincident is isolated andsecured, personalsafety procedures arefollowed, hazards areavoided or minimized,and additional peopleare not exposed tofurther harm.

5.3 Identify the responseoptions for a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, givena hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment,policies and procedures,approved reference sources,and the scope of the problem,so that response objectives,response options, safetyprecautions, suitability ofapproved personal protectiveequipment (PPE) available,and emergencydecontamination needs areidentified.

7.2.2 Collect and interpret hazard andresponse information at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, an assignment in anIAP, policies and procedures, approvedreference sources, and approved tools andequipment, so that hazard and responseinformation is collected, interpreted, andcommunicated.


190 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


4.4 Initiate requirednotifications at ahazardousmaterials/WMDincident, given ahazardousmaterials/WMDincident, an assignment,policies andprocedures, andapprovedcommunicationsequipment, so that thenotification process isinitiated and thenecessary information iscommunicated.

5.4 Perform assigned tasks ata hazardous materials/WMDincident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, anassignment with limitedpotential of contact withhazardous materials/WMD,policies and procedures, thescope of the problem, andapproved tools, equipment,and PPE, so that protectiveactions and scene control areestablished and maintained,incident managementsystem/incident commandsystem (IMS/ICS) isestablished, evidence ispreserved, safety proceduresare followed, PPE is used inthe proper manner, hazardsare avoided or minimized, andassignments are completed.

7.2.3 Assess the condition of a container andits closures at a hazardous materials/WMDincident, given an incident involving hazardousmaterials/WMD; an assignment in an IAP;policies and procedures; the scope of theincident, identity of material(s) involved andtheir hazards, including results of detection,monitoring, and sampling; a container withrequired markings; and approved resourcesand PPE, so that PPE is selected and used;the container and its closures are inspected;the type of damage to the container andclosures is identified; the type of stress on thecontainer is identified; the level of riskassociated with container and closure damageand stress is identified; safety procedures arefollowed; hazards are avoided or minimized; ifcontaminated, personnel, tools, andequipment are decontaminated; and adescription of the condition of the containerand its closures is communicated.

5.5 Perform emergencydecontamination at ahazardous materials/WMDincident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident thatrequires emergencydecontamination, anassignment, scope of theproblem, policies andprocedures, and approvedtools, equipment, and PPE foremergency decontamination,so that exposures areprotected and minimized, PPEis used in the proper manner,safety procedures arefollowed, hazards are avoidedor minimized, and victims andresponders aredecontaminated.

7.2.4 Predict the behavior of the hazardousmaterials/WMD involved in a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given an incidentinvolving multiple hazardous materials/WMD;an assignment in an IAP; policies andprocedures; physical and chemical propertiesof the materials involved; results of detection,monitoring, and sampling; condition of thecontainer (damage and stress); surroundingconditions; and approved reference sources,so that the behavior of each hazardousmaterials/WMD container and its contents isidentified, the reactivity issues and hazards ofthe combined materials are identified, and adescription of the likely behavior iscommunicated.

5.6 Evaluate and report theprogress of the assignedtasks for a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, givena hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment,policies and procedures,status of assigned tasks, andapproved communicationtools and equipment, so thatthe effectiveness of theassigned tasks is evaluatedand communicated to thesupervisor, who can adjust theIAP as needed.

7.2.5 Estimate the potential outcomes at ahazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident, anassignment in an IAP, policies andprocedures, results of the incident analysis,and approved resources and equipment, sothat the concentrations of materials within theendangered area are measured or predicted;physical, health, and safety hazards within theendangered area are identified; areas ofpotential harm in the endangered area areidentified; potential outcomes within the areasof potential harm in endangered areas areidentified; and potential outcomes arecommunicated.


191 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.3.1 Develop and recommend to the incidentcommander or hazmat officer responseobjectives and response options at ahazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident; anassignment in an IAP; results of the incidentanalysis, including incident-relatedinformation, life safety risks, environmentalrisks, and property risks; available resources;and policies and procedures, so that responseobjectives are identified for the incident andresponse options are identified for eachresponse objective.

7.3.2 Select the PPE ensemble required for agiven response option at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, results of the incidentanalysis, response objectives and options forthe incident, approved references, and policiesand procedures, so that required PPE isidentified for each response option.

7.3.3 Select the decontamination procedurefor a given response option at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, results of the incidentanalysis, response objectives and options forthe incident, available resources, and policiesand procedures, so that a decontaminationprocedure to minimize the hazards for eachresponse option is identified and theequipment required to implement thedecontamination procedure is identified.

7.3.4 Develop a plan of action for a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, an assignment in anIAP, results of the incident analysis, responseobjectives and options for the given incident,available resources, and policies andprocedures, so that the tasks and resourcesrequired to meet the response objectives areidentified, specified response objectives andresponse options are addressed, plan isconsistent with the emergency response planand policies and procedures, and plan iswithin the capability of available personnel,PPE, and control equipment.

7.4.1 Perform incident managementsystem/incident command system (IMS/ICS)function assigned at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident; an assignment in anIAP; results of the incident analysis, policiesand procedures, including an emergencyresponse plan and standard operatingprocedures; results of the incident analysis;the IAP; and approved resources, so that theassigned functions within the hazardousmaterials branch or group are completed.


192 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


7.4.2 Don, work in, and doff PPE at ahazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident, anassignment in an IAP, policies andprocedures, results of the incident analysis,response objectives and options for theincident, and PPE ensembles as identified inthe IAP, so that PPE is selected, inspected,donned, worked in, decontaminated, anddoffed; safety procedures are followed;hazards are avoided or minimized; equipmentis maintained and stored properly; and the useof PPE is recorded and reported.

7.4.3.1 Perform product control techniques ata hazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident withrelease of product, an assignment in an IAP,policies and procedures for product control,results of the incident analysis, responseobjectives and options for the incident, andapproved tools, equipment, control agents,and PPE, so that an approved product controltechnique is selected and implemented; theproduct is controlled; approved PPE isselected and used; exposures and personnelare protected; safety procedures are followed;hazards are avoided or minimized; ifcontaminated, personnel, victims, tools, andequipment used are decontaminated; toolsand equipment are inspected and maintained;and all required reports and documentationare completed.

7.4.3.2 Control leaks from containers and theirclosures at a hazardous materials/WMDincident, given a hazardous materials/WMDincident; an assignment in an IAP; results ofthe incident analysis; three scenarios,including a leak from a container or itsclosures, a leak from a nonbulk liquidcontainer or its closures, and a leak from abulk liquid container or its closures; policiesand procedures for controlling leaks fromcontainers and/or their closures; and approvedtools, equipment, and PPE, so that anapproved product control technique is selectedand used; approved PPE is selected andused; exposures and personnel are protected;safety procedures are followed; hazards areavoided or minimized; hazard monitoring iscompleted; leaks are controlled (confined orcontained); if contaminated, emergencyresponders, tools, and equipment used aredecontaminated; and tools and equipment areinspected and maintained; and all requiredreports and documentation are completed.

7.4.3.3 Overpack damaged or leaking nonbulkand radioactive materials containers at ahazardous materials/WMD incident, given a


193 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


hazardous materials/WMD incident, anassignment in an IAP, results of the incidentanalysis, a loaded damaged or leakingcontainer, a suitable overpack container,policies and procedures, and approved tools,equipment, and PPE, so that an approvedoverpack technique is selected; the damagedor leaking container is placed into a suitableoverpack and the overpack is closed, marked,and labeled; approved PPE is selected andused; exposures and personnel are protected;safety procedures are followed; hazards areavoided or minimized; if contaminated,emergency responders, tools, and equipmentare decontaminated; and tools and equipmentare inspected and maintained.

7.4.3.4 Transfer liquids from leakingnonpressure containers at a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident, given a hazardousmaterials/WMD incident; an assignment in anIAP; results of the incident analysis; a leakingnonpressure container and a recoverycontainer; policies and procedures fortransferring liquids from leaking nonpressurecontainers; and approved tools, equipment,and PPE, so that an approved product transfermethod is selected and used; approved PPEis selected and used; exposures andpersonnel are protected; safety proceduresare followed; hazards are avoided orminimized; hazard monitoring is completed;the containers are bonded and grounded;product is transferred to the recoverycontainer; if contaminated, emergencyresponders, tools, and equipment used aredecontaminated; and tools and equipment areinspected and maintained; and all requiredreports and documentation are completed.

7.4.4.1 Perform mass decontamination forambulatory and nonambulatory victims at ahazardous materials/WMD incident, given ahazardous materials/WMD incident requiringmass decontamination; an assignment in anIAP; policies and procedures; and approvedPPE, tools, and equipment, so that PPE isselected and used; a mass decontaminationprocedure is selected, set up, implemented,evaluated, and terminated; victims aredecontaminated; exposures and personnel areprotected; safety procedures are followed;hazards are avoided or minimized; ifcontaminated, personnel, tools, andequipment are decontaminated; and all reportsand documentation of mass decontaminationoperations are completed.

7.4.4.2 Establish and implement technicaldecontamination in support of entry operationsand for ambulatory and nonambulatory victims


194 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


at a hazardous materials/WMD incident, givena hazardous materials/WMD incident requiringtechnical decontamination; an assignment inan IAP; policies and procedures; andapproved PPE, tools, and equipment, so thatapproved PPE is selected and used; atechnical decontamination procedure isselected, set up, implemented, evaluated, andterminated; victims are decontaminated; safetyprocedures are followed; hazards are avoidedor minimized; if contaminated, personnel,tools, and equipment are decontaminated; andall reports and documentation of technicaldecontamination operations are completed.

7.5 Evaluate and report the progress ofassigned tasks at a hazardous materials/WMDincident, given a hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment in an IAP, currentincident conditions, response options andactions taken, and approved communicationequipment, so that the actual behavior ofmaterial and container is compared to thatpredicted, the effectiveness of responseoptions and actions in accomplishing responseobjectives is determined, modifications to theresponse options and actions are made, andthe results are communicated.

7.6 Terminate a hazardous materials/WMDincident, given a hazardous materials/WMDincident, an assignment in an IAP, policies andprocedures, operational observations ofactivities (incident information), and approvedforms for documentation and reporting, so thatassistance in scheduled incident debriefingsand critiques is provided, and documentationand reporting requirements are completed.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC recognizes the intent of the Correlating Committee to be consist with the material foundin each Pro-Qual document. As a result the TC is adding Annex C JPR matrix.

ResponseMessage:

Ballot Results


195 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


196 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 108-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. C.1.1 ]

E.1.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 11 , Standard for Low-, Medium-, and High-Expansion Foam , 2010 edition.

NFPA 30 , Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code , 2012 edition.

NFPA 58 , Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code , 2008 edition.

NFPA 472 , Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of MassDestruction Incidents , 2013 edition.

NFPA 473 , Standard for Competencies for EMS Personnel Responding to HazardousMaterials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents , 2008 edition.

NFPA 704, Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response,2011 2017 edition.

NFPA 1001 , Standard for Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications , 2013 edition.

NFPA 1971, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting and Proximity Fire Fighting,2013 edition.

NFPA 1981 , Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for EmergencyServices, 2013 edition.

NFPA 1991, Standard on Vapor-Protective Ensembles for Hazardous Materials Emergencies, 2005 2016edition.

NFPA 1992, Standard on Liquid Splash–Protective Ensembles and Clothing for Hazardous MaterialsEmergencies, 2012 2017 edition.

NFPA 1994, Standard on Protective Ensembles for First Responders to CBRN Terrorism Incidents,2012 2017 edition.

Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Response Handbook, 2008.

Wright, Charles J., “Managing the Hazardous Materials Incident,” Section 13, Chapter 8 in Fire ProtectionHandbook, 20th edition, 2008.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC updated the edition dates.

Response Message:

Ballot Results



197 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


198 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


E.1.2 Other Publications.

E.1.2.1 American Chemistry Council Publications.

American Chemistry Council, 700 Second St., NE, Washington, DC 20002.

Recommended Terms for Personal Protective Equipment , 1985.

E.1.2.2 API Publications.

American Petroleum Institute, 1220 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005-4070.

API 2021, Guide for Fighting Fires in and Around Flammable and Combustible Liquid AtmosphericPetroleum Storage Tanks , 2001.

API 2510-A, Fire Protection Considerations for the Design and Operation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas(LPG) Storage Facilities , 1996.

E.1.2.3 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM E 2770, Standard Guide for Operational Guidelines for Initial Response to a SuspectedBiothreat Agent , 2010.

ASTM E 2458, Standard Practices for Bulk Sample Collection and Swab Sample Collection of VisiblePowders Suspected of Being Biothreat Agents from Nonporous Surfaces, 2010.

E.1.2.4 IMO Publications.

International Maritime Organization, 4 Albert Embankment, London SEI 7SR, UK.

Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk , (BCHCode).

International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk(IBC Code).

International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Dangerous Liquefied Gases inBulk (IGC Code).

International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code).

MARPOL 73/78 .

Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) .

E.1.2.5 NRT Publications.

U.S. National Response Team, Washington, DC 20593, www.nrt.org.

NRT-1, Hazardous Materials Emergency Planning Guide , 2001.


199 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

E.1.2.1 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Responder Knowledge Base. http://www.rkb.mipt.org

Environmental Protection Agency, Standard Operating Safety Guides, June 1992.

National Incident Management System (NIMS), Site Safety and Control Plan (formerly ICS 208 HM)

National Toxicology Program, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 9th Report onCarcinogens , Washington, DC, 2011.

National Incident Management System (NIMS), March 2004, http://www.fema.gov/nims/nims_compliance.shtm#nimsdocument.

National Preparedness Goal, March 2005, https://www.llis.dhs.gov.

National Preparedness Guidance, April 2005, https://www.llis.dhs.gov.

National Response Plan, December 2004, http://www.dhs.gov/Xprepresp/committees/editorial_0566.shtm.

NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste SiteActivities , October 1985.

NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards , DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2007-149, September 2007:http://www.cdc.gov/niosh.npg.

Target Capabilities List, May, 2005, https://www.llis.dhs.gov.

Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 2332a, “Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction.”

Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1910.119–1910.120.

Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1910.134.

Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, “Navigation and Navigable Waters.”


Title 40, Code of Federal Regulation s , Part 302.

Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 355.

Title 46, Code of federal Regulations, “Shipping.”

Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 170–180.


Universal Task List, May 2005, https://www.llis.dhs.gov.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Emergency Response Guidebook , 2008 edition.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Hazardous Materials Marking, Labeling and Placarding Guide.

E.1.2.7 Additional Publications.

International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals , Witherby Seamanship International, 5thedition, 2006.

International Chamber of Shipping Tanker Safety Guide (chemicals), 3rd edition, Witherby and Co.,London, 1990.

International Chamber of Shipping Tanker Safety Guide (liquefied gases), 2nd edition, Witherby andCo., London, 1996.

OCIMF Ship to Ship- Transfer Safety Guide (petroleum) (liquefied gases), 3rd edition, InternationalChamber of Shipping OCIMF, London, 1997.

SIGTTO Liquefied Gas Handling Principles on Ships and in Terminals , 3rd edition, McGuire and White(Authors) London, 2000, Witherby Seamanship International.

Provisional Categorization of Liquid Substances , MEPC.2/Circ.10 2004, International MaritimeOrganization, London.


200 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

E.1.2.2 Other Publications.

“16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives,” National Fallen Firefighters Foundation, Emmitsburg, MD, 2004,reaffirmed 2014.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeStatement:

The TC agrees with the concept and principles related to the 16 Firefighter Life Safety Initiatives.The TC is placing them in a separate annex until the CC addresses the issue within the document.As a result of the placement in the annex the TC is referencing them in reference annex. Refer toFR# 3.

ResponseMessage:

Public Input No. 75-NFPA 1072-2015 [Section No. C.1.2]

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry


201 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


202 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM


E.2.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 11 , Standard for Low-, Medium-, and High-Expansion Foam , 2016 edition.

NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems,2011 2017 edition.

NFPA 30 , Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code , 2015 edition.

NFPA 58 , Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code , 2014 edition.

NFPA 306, Standard for the Control of Gas Hazards on Vessels, 2009 2014 edition.

NFPA 424, Guide for Airport/Community Emergency Planning, 2013 edition.

NFPA 473, Standard for Competencies for EMS Personnel Responding to Hazardous Materials/Weaponsof Mass Destruction Incidents, 2013 edition.

NFPA 600, Standard on Industrial Fire Brigades, 2015 edition.

NFPA 1031, Standard for Fire Inspector and Plan Examiner Professional Qualifications, 2014 edition.

NFPA 1404, Standard for Fire Service Respiratory Protection Training, 2006 2013 edition.

NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety and Health Program, 2013 edition.

NFPA 1561, Standard on Emergency Services Incident Management System, 2008 2014 edition.

NFPA 1581, Standard on Fire Department Infection Control Program, 2010 2015 edition.

NFPA 1951, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Technical Rescue Incidents, 2013 edition.

Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Response Handbook , 2008.

Wright, Charles J., “Managing the Hazardous Materials Incident,” Section 13, Chapter 8 in Fire ProtectionHandbook , 20th edition, 2008.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC updated edition dates.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned


203 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


204 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

First Revision No. 106-NFPA 1072-2015 [ Section No. C.3 ]

E.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections. (Reserved)

NFPA 472, Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of MassDestruction Incidents , 2013 edition.




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Statement: The TC is adding text to recognize extract in annex material.

Response Message:

Ballot Results


33 Eligible Voters

1 Not Returned

32 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Makins, Jr., Carl

Affirmative All


Beckering, Donald

Carr, H. K.

Carrasco, Jorge A.

Coffey, William R.

Collins, K. Wade

D'Onofrio, Cris

Edinger, Richard C.

Emery, Richard B.

Hergenreter, Steven

Ingram, Robert J.

Johnson, Kevin W.

Lilley, Troy


205 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Lindley, Barry

Linsley, Mark E.

McNett, Wayne

Miller, Leslie A.

Miller, Thomas D.

Minson, Matthew

Noll, Gregory G.

Porter, John F.


Rehak, Timothy R.


Schnepp, Rob

Simpson, Danny G.

Stenner, Robert


Terryn, Fred C.

Tracy, Christopher

Uzeloc, Kenneth W.

Wright, Charles J.


206 of 206 5/14/2015 3:30 PM

Final Results Memo - NFPA · Subject: NFPA 1072 First Draft TC FINAL Ballot Results (F2016 Cycle)...

Documents

Transcript of Final Results Memo - NFPA · Subject: NFPA 1072 First Draft TC FINAL Ballot Results (F2016 Cycle)...