Final Report-on PMS
-
Upload
krishna-praveen-puli -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Final Report-on PMS
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
1/65
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
Performance appraisal is a method of evaluating the behavior of employees in the work
spot, normally including both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of job performance. It is the
process of evaluating the performance and qualification of the employees in terms of therequirements of the job for which he is employed, for purpose of administration including
placement, selection for promotions, providing financial rewards and other actions affecting all
members equally. It is the step where the management finds out how effective it has been at
hiring and placing the employees. Performance Appraisal is a process of evaluating an
employees performance of a job for purposes in terms of requirements.
FEATURES OF PERFORMANCE APPRIASAL
Performance appraisal is the systematic description of an employees job relevant
strengths and weaknesses.
The basic purpose is to find out how well the employee is performing the job and
establish a plan of improvement.
Appraisals are arranged periodically according to a definite plan.
Performance appraisal is not job evaluation. It refers to how well someone is doing the
assigned job.
Performance Appraisal is the continuous process in every large scale organization.
COMPONENTS OF APPRAISAL EVALUATION
Performance evaluation can be made for a variety of reasons like counseling, promotion,
research, salary, administration or a combination of these. So it is necessary to begin by stating
very clearly the objectives of the evaluation programs.
WHO WILL APPRAISE
The Appraisal can be accomplished by one or more individuals involving a combination
of the inundate supervisor or Boss and HOD.
WHAT FOR APPRAISE
What of the Performance appraisal means appraising non supervisory employees for
their current performance, and mangers for the future potential.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
2/65
WHY FOR THE APPRAISAL
Creating and maintaining a satisfactory level of performance of employees in their
present job.
Highlighting employee needs and opportunities for personal growth and development.
Aiding in decision making for promotions, transfer, layoffs and discharges and promoting
understanding between the supervisor and the subordinates.
WHEN WILL APPRAISE
When answers the query about the frequency of appraisal. In Visaka employees are
formally evaluated half yearly and annually.
HOW TO APPRAISE
How means the company must decide what different method are available and which
of these may be used for performance appraisal. In Visaka Industries the method of appraisal is
BARS.
COMMON RATING ERRORS
Whilst completing the appraisal form, the appraiser is advised exercise caution, as there amy be
several pitfalls which may skew the assessment.
1. Halo Effect
A person outstanding in one area tends to receive outstanding or better than average
ratings in other areas as well, even when such a rating is undeserved.
2. Negative Effect
A low rating in one area is lower than deserved ratings for other accomplishments.
3. Central Tendency
Assigning an average rating for all qualities.
4. Confrontation Avoidance:
Discomfort in giving negative feedback.
5. Initial Performance:
Rating an employee based solely on initial impressions of the performance.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
3/65
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Performance Management is defined as a strategic and integrated process that delivers
sustained success to organizations by improving employee performance through development of
competencies of individual employees and teams.
Performance management systems if properly designed and implemented can change the course
of growth and pace of impact of organizations. Its a process of creating high performance
organization through integration of organizational vision values, goals, strategies and people.
It is a method used to measure and improve the effectiveness of people in work place.
It is an ongoing communication between boss and subordinate in a bid to identify latters core
functions, relevant objective /goals, monitor the performance process and give constructive
feedback and also develop the competency based there on.
Performance management involves - enhancing performance of:
Individuals
Teams & Strategic Business Unit
Entire Organization
Importance of Performance Management
Helps to clarify the mission, vision, strategy and values of the organization.
Helps in improving various business processes.
Helps in attracting and retaining talent.
Facilitates competency mapping, training and development needs.
Assists management in validating their recruitment and selection processes.
Helps employees attain their full potential.
Factors Affecting Performance:
1) Personal Factors: The individuals skill, competence, motivation and commitment.
2) Leadership Factors: The supervisors support, encouragement and guidance.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
4/65
3) Team Factors: The quality of encouragement, guidance and support provided by team
leaders and members of the team.
4) System Factors: The system of work and facilities provided by the organization.
5) Contextual Factors: Internal and External environmental pressures and changes.
Features of Performance Management
It is a continuous process: setting goals, observing performance, giving coaching and
counseling, identifying development needs and giving feedback are the continous
activities.
It is a strategic process: The individual goals are linked to the strategic goals of the
organization.
It is an integral approach: Links various aspects of HRM
RECRUITMENT AND
SELECTION
HUMAN RESOURCE
PLANNING
INDUSTRIAL
RELATIONS
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT
TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT
MENTORING AND
COUNSELING
REWARD
MANAGEMENT
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
5/65
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Vs PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
S.No PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
1. Annual Exercise. Continuous process.
2. Emphasis is on ratings and evaluation. Emphasis is on performance planning, analysis,
review, development and improvement.
3. Rewards, recognition may be based on
the ratings.
Performance based pay is generally an integral
part of the system.
4. KPAs or KRAs are used for bringing
in objectivity.
KPAs and KRAs are used as planning
mechanism.
5. Ownership is mainly with the HR
department.
Ownership is with the line manager.HR
facilitates its implementation.
6. Development needs are identified at
the end of the year on the basis of the
appraisal .
Development needs are identified in the
beginning of the year on the basis of
competence levels required to do job.
7. Emphasis is on relative evaluation of
individuals
Emphasis is on performance improvement of
individual, teams and organization.
THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN VISAKA
MODE OF PMS IN VIL:
Self appraisal and immediate boss = reporting supervisor appraisal
FLOWCHART OF PMS:
ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBILITY DEADLINE1)ORG. yearly
objective2)Strategic planning
Focus on financial measures viz
Liquidity,Revenue,Profitability&also Market share,Productivity &
customer orientation,
Diversification & Expansion of
the business
Top Management
Unit Level Goals Productivity,OTFD,Quality
improvement, systemdevelopment,cost saving incl.
rejection ratio, people
development,safety/Environment
Top Management &
Unit Head/HODs
28th Feb 2011
Planning to achieve Systematic outlining of activities Unit Head/HODs
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
6/65
units Priorities to be undertaken to attain the
objectives
Dept level Goals Derived from unit goals / supportrequired by other departments
Unit Head/HODs 31st march
Individual Goals(KRA Setting)
Derived from Dept. goals andfocus on self and subordinate
development
Employees and IB 31st March
Action Plan In PDCA Format-Strategy to
achieve target
Employee 31st March
Periodical Review To refer KRA sheet and
Supportive documents
IB & Employee Half Yearly
Feedback and
Counseling
Discussion on Contribution and
developmental plans
IB During KRA review
PerformanceReward
Performance based increment andpromotion
Top Management &corporate HR
May-June
Career
Advancement
Job Enrichment/Job
Rotation/Career Progression Plan
IB & HOD,
Facilitated by HR
July
Training &
Development
Personal Development Plan IB & HR May
COMPONENTS OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Performance Planning & Objective Setting
II. Performance Assessment
III. Career Development
IV. Rewards
Purpose of Performance Appraisal
To review the performance of the employees over a given period of time. To judge the gap between the actual and the desired performance. To help the management in exercising organizational control. To diagnose the training and development needs of the future. Provide information to assist in the HR decisions like promotions, transfers etc. Provide clarity of the expectations and responsibilities of the functions to be performed
by the employees.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
7/65
To judge the effectiveness of the other human resource functions of the organization suchas recruitment, selection, training and development.
To reduce the grievances of the employees. Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication between superior subordinates
and management employees.
GOAL SETTING:
Goal setting involves establishing specific, measurable and time bound objectives. In business,
goals encourage employees to put in substantial effort in order to meet business objective.
Goal setting influences individual performance in the following way:
1) Goals focus attention towards goal- relevant activities and away from goal-irrelevant
activities.
2) Goals serve as an energizer; higher goals will induce greater effort.
3) Goals influence persistence; higher energy to work around/manage constraints with
regard to resources.
4) Stretch goals, encourages application of cognitive knowledge, innovation, collaboration
and personal commitment in order to accomplish objectives.
Cumulative individual performance, when aligned, impacts the organizational Performance
in a big way.
ORGANIZATIONAL FINANCIAL GOALS:
Liquidity
Profitability
Growth
Factors related to key business purpose & deliverables
Revenue
New product
Market share
Cost effectiveness
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
8/65
Diversification & Expansion of business
ORGANIZATIONAL NON-FINANCIAL GOALS:
Customer satisfaction
People development
Internal process optimization
Safety and Environment
Critical success factors for business & key deliverables to achieve Non Financial Goals:
1) Customer connect
Feedback mechanism
Response time
Complaint resolution
OTFD (on time full delivery)
Rejection Ratio
Quality
2) People Development
Growth & development of Team
Success planning
Skill Development
3) Internal Process optimization
Inter-departmental Services level agreements
Collaborative goals
Support & adherence to organizational process
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
9/65
4) Safety and Environment
Initiatives, assuring safety of employees & companys property
Pollution free environment & arresting /reducing depletion of natural resources
KRAs: KEY RESULT AREAS
Goal, when broken down into deliverables against each critical element is called KRA.
Characteristics:
They do not include routine work.
It always focuses on end result but not activities.
They should be written in specific term.
KRA is measurable and frame in time.
Aligned with organizational goal.
Achievable but challenging.
STEPS FOR SETTING KRA:
1) Identify the objectives under the three critical elements that impact the job.
a) To be done along with your reporting supervisor
b) Identify objectives relevant for the job under each of the three elements
c) Ask the following three questions for each of the identified objectives:
Performance: what is the desired outcome?
Process: What will I need to do to achieve it?
Measurement: How will we measure the success?
Selecting Objectives, they should be:
Linked to business priorities- must add value to the larger organization purposes
Linked to results not activities- Outcome driven not activity based.
Comprehensive should cover all performance areas of the role.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
10/65
Mutually exclusive-each KRA should address a distinct performance area and not
overlap.
Attainable-Ensure that objectives are stretched and challenging but attainable
Manageable number- Preferably not more than six to seven KRA for a person.
2) Set measurement standards
An element that allows for specific measurement of performance over a definite period of
time.
All areas of performance need to be expressed in measureable terms related to any of the
below:
Time
Quality
Cost
Volume
Percentage improvement
3) Write KRA statement
The KRA statement should be:
S- Specific: clearly specify the scope of job which needs to be done. Not vague or
ambiguous.
M-Measureable: In terms of cost and time, volume, percentage improvement.
A-Attainable: Should be attainable with a stretch
R-realistic: Should be realistically possible within the time frame and resources available
T-Time bound: Exp: Apr 2010- Mar2011
4) Set KRA Weightage
The total weight age of all KRAs is 100.Based on the significance, effort and time
involved and the overall impact of the deliverable, the weight age for individual KRA
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
11/65
will be decided jointly by the IB and the individual. Weight age is signed to clarify
related importance of each KRA.
During appraisals the rating for each KRA will be based on performance, contributionand weight age assigned
Maximum weight age to KRA is 25%, Minimum weight age to KRA is 10%
Weightage should be given as 10%,15%,20%,25%
5) Setting action plan
The employees will prepare a documented action plan to how to achieve the target.
Action plan provides the how and when for the individual and guides him/her in
fulfilling their defined KRA.
KRA online format
Sr. No KRA Title Description Unit of
measurement(%)
Weight age Annual
Target
1 Absenteeism Reducing
Absenteeismfrom 9% to
6%
% 15% By march
2011
Example:
Action plan for the above KRA could have the following activities
1) Review last 12 months attendance data of habitual absentees in various departments
to know the trend
2) Data about the disciplinary action,
3) Prepare a flow chart for step by step action i.e, right from counseling through various
levels to amend.
Scope for change of KRA
1) In case any KRA is achieved in the mid of the year, the employee can undertake
another KRA in consultation with the IB.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
12/65
2) One employee can also be given a new KRA along with other KRAs in the mid of
the year based on the strategic requirement of the department or the organization.
3) In the above cases the weight age can be redistributed among KRAs based on the
magnitude of their contribution to the organizations objectives.
4) In case of change of existing KRA or inclusion of any new KRA in the mid of the
year, the IB or local HR will approach the corporate Super User for changing
the KRA plan of the concerned employee in the system.
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Objective: To see whether the employee are on the right track viz a viz their
performance goals and to provide adequate resources and support for superior
performance. There are a few environmental factors which influence the
performance of the appraise. The appraise can mention about such factors during
review orally as well as in the review format with a view to get required support
to overcome the hindering factors.
Four facilitating factors:
To identify the factors help employees to reach the level of performance, he/she
achieved in relation to various KRAs and such factors are as follows:
Individual factors- Hard work, knowledge, past experience, competence.
IB Factor- Approachability, fast decision, good guidance, delegation,
support.
Organizational Factors-Flexible policy, staff support, good working
condition, open climate other department support.
External Factors- Liberalization in govt. policies, cooperation from govt.
official due to good rapport, Poor performance of competitors.
Hindering Factors:
Personal Factors- poor health problem or family problem
IB & Environmental factors- Delay in decision making, lack of guidance,
busy boss, resource problem.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
13/65
External Factors- Sudden change in economic, social and political climate,
Delay in supplies.
Developing Factors- The IB is to identify developmental needs for better
performance through creating an empathic atmosphere to share and discuss
subordinates tension and concerns and to encourage him with resource andother support for better performance.
METHODOLOGY FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS:
Steps to performance analysis
1) Be prepared
The IB & Subordinates both need to be prepared for the review.
The IB need to fix up the date, timing and place and communicate
the same to subordinate well in advance.
The subordinate before coming for appraisal meeting, need to do
self appraisal and evaluate own achievement of KRAs in the
prescribed review format in HRMS. The subordinates with
relevant data and documents to justify his achievements
The subordinate after assigning himself such rating he/she shouldlist down all factors, help him/ her in accomplishing what ever
he/she has accomplished. Similarly he/she should list out the
factors prevented him or her from doing better performance.
The subordinate should maintain a note book from the begging of
the year to note the facilitating and hindering factors.
The subordinate should assess his strength and weakness and also
to identify the areas of improvement so as to discuss with the IB
for suggestion and finalization of his or her development partduring the review process.
2) IB to conduct performance appraisal meeting
Greet with smiling face
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
14/65
Start with positive note (mention about the good contribution and
strength shown during the year)
Explain normal distribution curve to the appraise. Give chance to
the appraise to speak about his achievements and shortcomings.
Evaluate each KRA.
Reflect and mutually agree upon the short falls or success.
Discuss and agree upon action plan, support and resource required
for improvement and document the same.
Discuss and agree upon the learning opportunities for upgrading
the skills.
Give a overall feedback on the performance.
Give appropriate rating on each KRA
Express trust and confidence in subordinate and encourage him/her
for overcoming the weakness and bigger contribution.
Confirm the agreement on all issues discuss with subordinates by
documenting the same and by putting the signatures.
3) IB Should no focus on previous year failures and should not criticize with
insulting words
Focus on only how to improve performance
Be specific to the performance related issues.
Give honest feedback
Do not focus on previous year failure area to rate the performance
of the current year.
Do not use discouraging words
4) Get on the record, it is important to document the key points of the
meeting if any one disagree with what was discussed or agreed in the
appraisal, the records can be checked
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
15/65
PMS PART-II
Evaluation of critical behavior attributes
At present VIL, the performance of an employee is being appraised by the concerned IB on
certain set of identified behavioral skills. It is felt that the job holders must have those behavioral
skills, as the same make the job holder more effective in his role for higher contribution.
In abid to make the job holders, enriched with certain skills at various levels, the PMS will
continue to provide the scope for appraisal of identified behavioral skills of employee along with
KRA review.
The specific behavior skills will be identified every year by the IB in consultation with the
concerned employee and in coordination with the head HR at locations for an employee,
matching to his or her responsibilities and nature of job at the beginning of the year i.e.; whatskills are required for the job holder to discharge his new responsibilities in a superior manner.
The identification of soft skills feedback well as competency review will be done by job holder
and subsequently by IB in the competency template, available in the PMS module in HRMS. The
IB will also give feedback about the rating of behavioral skills to the subordinates during the
performance review .The IB and subordinate will discuss and agree upon the areas of
improvement in behavioral skills with action plan for further improvement.
PMS-PART-III
SELF APPRAISAL:
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
16/65
Self assessment I
At present in VIL, there is an Employee Self Assessment process in operation in a prescribed
format. The objective is to get feedback about employees achievements in the last financial year
when he/she needs improvement to upgrade his/her competency and knowledge for higher
contribution in the ensuing g year.
This PMS policy will continue to provide the scope of the self assessment process in KRA
template on achievement of own KRA as well as assessment of a set of competencies, identified
for an employee in the competency template available in the PMS module under HRMS.
The training needs can be identified from the early review template, available in PMS module
under HRMS.
Self Assessment-II
The PMS policy provide an opportunity to the employee to assess his/her own contribution
against each KRA in VIL half yearly and yearly performance review and the same will be
reviewed by the IB who will subsequently give his/her own rating based on employees
achievement in the KRA half yearly or yearly template available in PMS module in HRMS.
APPEAL:
1st level:
If the appraise is not convinced with the rating of IB, he/she can
approach the reviewing officer to intervene.
The RO will discuss with the appraise and IB separately initially to
understand the issues and will verify the facts and figures
justifying the level of contribution and rating of the IB
commiserating with quantum of achievement in a specific KRA.
Subsequently the reviewing officer will call both the appraise and
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
17/65
the IB for a collective discussion to resolve the matter. The
decision of the RO will be binding.
2nd level :
If the appraise is agreed with the decision of the RO, he can
approach the unit head at plant level through unit HR head.
The unit head after going through the relevant data will
take decision and can impress upon the IB and RO for an
amendment of rating, if the unit head feels justified.
Otherwise the rating given by the RO will sustain. The unit
head at branch level will be the final appealing authority
under the PMS to prevail over the IB and RO for redressal
of grievance.
Where the unit head is the IB, if any such appraise is
aggrieved with the rating of his/her IB, will put forth his
grievance before the vice president-technical in case of AC
division and President-Marketing in case of textile
division.The division of these authority wil be considered
as final and will prevail upon the division of the IB.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
18/65
METHODOLOGY
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY:
To evaluate the functioning of the Performance Management system in this organization.
To know whether the Performance appraisal system of the organization is able to assess
employees performance correctly.
To understand the pitfalls of Performance appraisal system
To know whether the employees are getting adequate or useful feedback or not.
To know whether the performance of the employees are recognized and whether they are
rewarded for their performance or not.
To understand the KRA setting.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
19/65
To understand the effectiveness of performance management over performance appraisal.
METHODOLOGY:-
The total data required for the study has been collected by using primary data andsecondary data. It was made in a systematic manner, as follows.
Primary Data:-
In the due course of the study the primary data was collected through a structured
questionnaire. The questionnaire is one in which all questions and answers are specified. Hence,
there is less scope for the comments made in the own word of the respondents. The questionnaireis prepared.
Secondary Data:-
The secondary data is collected from various sources available with the organizations like
1 Organizational websites
2 Books & Manuals3 Organizations literature (Induction Manual)
Sample Size:
The sample size for Performance Appraisal is 15 & Performance Management system is 30.
Sampling Techniques:
Random & cluster sampling techniques are used.
LIMITATIONS:
The study is conducted with the available data gathered from the organization and
analysis was made accordingly.
The questionnaires for Performance Appraisal were distributed through E-mail so there
was no personal interaction contrary to the Performance Management questionnaires.
The responses for Performance Management system was confined to two locations i.e
Nagpur & Vijayawada Factory, where the PMS was completely implemented.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
20/65
COMPANY PROFILE
ORGANIZATION PROFILE
Present activities of the company
The Company is a multi products/location establishment, presently engaged in the manufacture
and marketing of Building Products and Synthetic Blended Yarn.
Brief history of the company
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
21/65
The Company was incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 on 18 th June 1981 as
Visaka Asbestos Cement Products Limited. With effect from 9th August 1990, the name of the
Company was changed to Visaka Industries Limited.
The Company has a Rs. 606.35 crores in 2008-09 and it is a dividend paying Company, engaged
in the business of Building Products and Synthetic Blended Yarn.
Process and Technology
The Companys Spinning Unit employs the latest spinning machines based on the Air Jet
Spinning Technology procured from Murata of Japan and Visaka is the biggest leader of Air Jet
spinning in the world with highest productivity and efficiency. The Companys three Asbestos
Cement Sheet Manufacturing Units operating above 100%of capacity utilization with ISI
accreditation .These units employ a continuous technology.
Geographical Coverage of Units
UNIT LOCATION
A.C.DIVISION-1
Patancheru
Andhra Pradesh
A.C.DIVISION-2
Paramathi
Tamilnadu
A.C.DIVISION-3
Midnapore
West Bengal
A.C.DIVISION-4
Tumkur
Karnataka
A.C.DIVISION-5
Raebareli
Uttar Pradesh
A.C.DIVISION-6
Vijayawada
Andhra Pradesh
A.C.DIVISION-7
Pune
Maharashtra
Textile Division
Non-Asbestos (V-Boards)
Maharashtra
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
22/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
23/65
Everybody has a pride to work in Visaka with a religious feeling that Organisation First.
Everybody is committed to do what they do with a feeling that he/she is the owner of the
company & is always responsible for his/her deed.
Visakas Image:
The company stands for its image in the society. It is the expectation of the Company that its
employees should contribute in such a way, which will boost up the companys image. As a
result of which both the company along with its employees will be known for its culture in
the public. Every employee should act as an ambassador of the company in magnifying the
image of the company through his/her attitude, integrity, behavior and character by that the
people in the society would take the name of VISAKA with respect. Always we should see
that the Visakas flag flies high in the global arena.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
1 Is the Performance Appraisal system participatory?
YES NO
13 2
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
24/65
INTERPRETATION
According to the survey, Eighty seven percent of the respondents agree that the
performance appraisal system is participatory. Thirteen percent of the respondents
are of opinion that appraisal system is not participatory. It depicts that these
thirteen percent respondents do not accept the appraisal procedure and are of the
views that there should be change in the system.
2Do you think that the prime goal of the Organization is well
communicated to every employee?
YES NO
12 3
INTERPRETATION
Eighty percent of the respondents are aware of the goals and target they have to
achieve whereas twenty percent of the respondents are unknown about the
organizational goals which depicts that either the organizational goals are not well
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
25/65
communicated to these set of respondents or the understanding level of them is
low.
3Does an employee know the annual goals of the Organization &
his/her Immediate Boss?
YES NO
12 3
INTERPRETATION
Knowledge about the annual goals of the organization and his/ her immediate boss
is essential for any employee in order to contribute to the organizational
development. According to the survey, eighty percent of the respondents know
about the annual goals of the organization whereas twenty percent of the
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
26/65
respondents are not aware about it which means that these twenty percent
respondents are not active and participatory.
4Does your current system tell employees at the beginning of the
year that what they are expected to perform during the yearinstead of at the end of year?
YES NO
11 4
INTERPRETATION
In every organization the employees are well communicated about what they
expected to do during the year at the beginning itself but twenty seven percent of
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
27/65
the respondents deny with this fact which shows that there might be barriers in the
flow of information.
5Does your appraisal system have any scope for periodical review
of performance of employee?
YES NO
10 5
INTERPRETATION
Thirty three percent of the respondents are of the opinion that there is no scope for
periodical review. This can be attributed to the few departments which are directly
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
28/65
involved in the production activities. They might be busy with the routine schedule
which does not provide them the time to go for periodical review.
6Do you think that any employee, not performing well is given feedback by his/her IB to improve in the middle of the year rather thanwait till end of the year?
YES NO
11 4
INTERPRETATION
According to the survey, twenty seven percent of the respondents do not provide
feedback to the low performing employees. This could be due to not carrying out
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
29/65
periodical review or the irresponsibility of the Immediate Boss. It might also be that
the IBs wait for the final appraisal period due to which they do not guide the low
performers to perform better through their feedback.
7Whether the appraisal rating is opened to the employees through aface to face review with IB and subsequently both employee &
Boss make the developmental plan.
YES NO
9 6
INTERPRETATION
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
30/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
31/65
INTERPRETATION
The more transparent is the system the more better it is for the organization and
the employees. The employees should be made aware about the assessment of
their IBs so as to help them improve themselves and perform better in the future.
Ninety three percent of the respondents agree with this fact.
9 Is the present Appraisal system transparent?
YES NO
10 5
INTERPRETATION
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
32/65
As per the survey, sixty seven percent of the respondents say that the Appraisal
system is transparent whereas thirty three percent of them believe that the system
is not transparent because they might feel that there are biases shown during
rating.
10 Is the appraisal system integrated to annual increment process?
YES NO
14 1
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
33/65
INTERPRETATION
As per the survey, ninety three percent respondents agree that the appraisal system is integrated
to the annual increment process which means that the employees are paid for their hard work and
are accustomed to it.
11
Does the appraisal system identify the training needs at thebeginning of the year for development of skill to achieve the targetset for the year?
YES NO
12 3
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
34/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
35/65
INTERPRETATION
Though it may look unusual, ninety three percent i.e majority of the respondents agree that
Immediate bosses counsel the employee to overcome the weak areas.
Only seven percent are of the different opinion.
13
Do you feel that the employees are happy with the presentPerformance Appraisal system?
YES NO
10 5
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
36/65
INTERPRETATION
Sixty seven percent of the respondents feel that they are happy with the present Appraisalsystem. The remaining thirty three percent are not at all happy with the present system. This
could be due to the thought that the system is not transparent and does not provide scope for
developing.
15
Does Performance Appraisal helps in charting the career graph foryour employees within the organizations?
YES NO
11 4
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
37/65
INTERPRETATION
According to the survey, seventy three percent respondents accept that the performance appraisal
system helps in charting the career graph of the employees whereas twenty seven percent do not
agree with it.
16 Are the High performing employees identified?
YES NO
12 3
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
38/65
INTERPRETATION
Eighty percent respondents say that the high performing employees are identified whereas
twenty percent are against it which means there must be bias in practice which fails to identify
the actual performers.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRATATION
1Whether the organization goals are communicated to you? If yes,do you understand the goal and your responsibility for attaining
these goals?
YES NO
25 4
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
39/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
40/65
INTERPRETATION
In order to achieve the targets, the individual goals are to be aligned to the organizational goals.
In the survey we found out that eighty three percent of the respondents feel that the individual
goals are aligned to the organizational goals, while remaining seventeen percent are in
contradiction to the above view. These small percent of the respondents may be of the ground
level that doesnt have the clarity of the organizational goals.
2(b)
Are your goals designed in consultation with immediate Boss?
YES NO
29 0
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
41/65
INTERPRETATION
In the previous Appraisal system, around seventy three percent of the respondents felt that their
immediate bosses had clearly stated their goals, but in the Performance Management system the
KRA settings of the employees is done in consultation with their immediate bosses. So it is
obvious that the every respondent would support this statement.
2(c)
Do you have any action plan as to how to achieve your KRAs?
YES NO
25 4
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
42/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
43/65
INTERPRETATION
KRAs to be achieved should be reasonable and match the job profile of the employee. Anythingwhich is not within their reach can bring pressure on the employee and reduce his capabilities of
doing the work efficiently. Here ninety seven percent of the respondents feel that their KRAs are
within their reach as these are initially prepared by themselves.
4Do you feel that the PMS helps in identifying gap in individual'sperformance?
YES NO
26 3
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
44/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
45/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
46/65
INTERPRETATION
The main concern in Performance Appraisal System was biasness in the rating. The new system
has got more support in terms of transparency compared to the old one. Ninety three percent of
respondents are of the opinion that the current system would reduce biasness to large extent.
7 Does this system motivate you to contribute more towards
organizational goals?
YES NO
28 1
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
47/65
INTERPRETATION
Ninety seven percent of respondents say they are being motivated to contribute more towards
their organizational goals with the introduction of PMS; this is because the KRAs are preparedby themselves and in consultation with their immediate bosses. So they are aware of what they
have to perform.
8Do you feel that the existing system is effective one or any furtherimprovement is required to improve the system?
YES NO
21 8
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
48/65
INTERPRETATION
Seventy two percent of the respondents feel that the existing system is effective as it is
transparent , where as twenty eight percent feel it is not effective as the ground level employees
requires training to understand PMS more better.
9Do you feel the current system is better than earlier Appraisal
system in Visaka?
YES NO28 1
INTERPRETATION
Ninety seven percent of the respondents feel that the current system is better than the earlier
appraisal system, because they feel it is more transparent, focuses on performance improvement
of individuals, teams and organization and ensures fair appraisal.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
49/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
50/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
51/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
52/65
Vision, Mission & Goals should be designed, so as to direct the employees in a right
direction.
Focus should be there on Career development plan so as to retain talented employees and
help motivate them to perform better.
Performance Management audit has to be conducted so as to check the effectiveness of
the system.
Succession planning needs to be clearly defined in the company policy.
CONCLUSION
It has been a knowledgeable and explorative experience at VISAKA INDUSTRIES where the
study on performance management system has been carried out .it was a great opportunity to
work with some of the big guns of the organization like the vice president HR who had immense
knowledge about the subject and who was an ideal guide in the study. Learning about the past
system at VISAKA INDUSTRIES gave us an idea as to how performance appraisal system
works practically in a production based organization. This experience gave us the much requiredinsight on how all the departments and their processes are interlinked to each other based on
which the performance management system has been designed. A transition from the present
appraisal system to the much talked about performance management system is highly essential to
VISAKA INDUSTRIES if it wants to improve the overall effectiveness of the organization by
upgrading the performance levels of the individuals.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
53/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
54/65
PERFORMANCE REVIEW & PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Period of Appraisal: 1st
April 2010 to 31st
March 2011
Appraised by Immediate Boss & Head of the Department
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
Employee Name Mr. Anjaneyulu Pola Employee Code 10110
Date of Birth 20-Dec-1967 Date of Joining 26-Aug-1992
Location Corporate Office Designation Sr. Accounts Officer
Qualifications PGDIM, B.Com
Previous Experience 5 Years
Visakas Experience 18 Years 8 Months
Experience in present
position
2 Years
FACTORS OF ASSESSMENT
Performance Ratings Point per each rating Overall rating
Excellent 10 80 & above
Good 08 60 & above
Average 06 50 & above
Poor 04 Below 50
a) Job Knowledge and Learning IB HOD
1. Demonstrates a basic knowledge of all aspects of job and applies this
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
55/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
56/65
e) Organising and Resource utilization IB HOD
1. Ability of organising the things properly and effective utilisation of
resources: tools and equipment, human resources and in terms money:
cost effectiveness.
2. Maximizing the productivity
Weighted Average
f) Decision Making IB HOD
1. Close analysis of the job and relevant facts
2. Evaluate various alternatives
3. A realistic plan of action
Weighted Average
g) Team Work of co-operation IB HOD
1. Spontaneous co-operation whenever required
2. Contributes by sharing knowledge
3. Enhances team performances through personal effectiveness
4. Looks team performances through personal effectiveness
5. Looks beyond the requirement of job and other suggestions for the
improvement of team performance
6. Leadership qualities.
Weighted Average
h) Problem Solving IB HOD
1. Solves problems logically/Manages situations
2. Seeks own knowledge and experience base in trouble shooting
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
57/65
3. Demonstrates creativity in problem solving
Weighted Average
i) Personal Effectiveness IB HOD
1. Displays emotional control and maturity by showing the ability to not
personalise issues in work situation
2. Seeks and reinforces positive feedback and works on shortcomings
3. Applies time management skills by respecting time of others and self
4. Ability to treat specific information as confidential
Weighted Average
j) Organisational commitment & conduct IB HOD
1. Upholds Visaka Image
2. Gives priority to customers/suppliers above personal interests
3. Provides constructive criticism and valuable suggestions.
4. Attitude
5. Punctuality
6. Obedience / Subordination
Weighted Average
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Recommendation for promotion to the next position and specific comments as achievements and
justification for promotion.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
58/65
Present Designation: To be Promoted As:
TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
Specify the areas where need to be trained.
1.
2.
3.4.
5.
Signature of Immediate Boss Signature of HOD Personnel Dept.
Date:
PART - B
SELF ASSESSMENT FORM
Period of Appraisal: 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2011
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
59/65
Name: Designation:
Department:
1. Your specific achievements in the present job in the last 1 year
2. To fulfill the above achievements what way your superiors/colleagues/sub-ordinates helped you?
3. What is the role you are playing in the organization to meet the organizational goals?
4. What is that gives you satisfaction in your job and what additional responsibilities you propose to
shoulder?
5. What are your suggestions on the existing working environment?
6. Write your objectives for the next one year along with the action plan.
7. Specify your strengths and weaknesses.
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
60/65
Strengths: Weaknesses:
8. What type of training programme& support from the company will be helpful to you to improve youroverall performance?
Signature of Employee.
Date:
Note: if required use separate Sheet.
QUESTIONNAIRE
We, Krishna Praveen Puli and Aayushi Jain the students of Gitam University have prepared this
questionnaire as a part of our study on Performance Management System. The data collection is solely for
the project purpose and will be kept confidential and undisclosed to the outsiders. Your kind cooperation
would be mutually beneficial.
Questions & Answer
1- Is the Performance Appraisal system participatory?
2- Do you think that the prime goal of the Organization is well communicated to everyemployee?
NAME OF RESPONDER: DESIGNATION:
NUMBER OF APPRAISALS DONE TILL DATE: NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
APPRAISED BY YOU:
NO
YES
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
61/65
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
62/65
13- Do you feel that the employees are happy with the present Performance Appraisal
system?
14- Does the organization feel the need of competency development of employees for theirsuperior contribution in productivity & culture development and higher customer
satisfaction?
15-Does Performance Appraisal helps in charting the career graph for your employees within
the organizations?
16- Are the High performing employees identified?
QUESTIONNAIRE ON PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
1) Have you been educated by the HR department about the PMS concept and your
responsibility under the new system?
2) Is there transparency in the current system?
a) Whether the organization goals are communicated to you? If yes, do you understand
the goal and your responsibility for attaining these goals?
b) Are your goals (KRAs) aligned to the organizational goals?
c) Are your goals designed in consultation with immediate Boss?
NO
YES
NO
YES
OS
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NOYES
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
63/65
d) Do you have any action plan as to how to achieve your KRAs?
3) Are you involved in the KRA setting?
4) Do you feel that your Kras are reasonable and within the reach?
5) Do you feel that the PMS helps in identifying gap in individuals performance?
6) Do the PMS help in individual development (Skill & Performance)?
7) Do you think that the present system is free from biasness?
8) Does this system motivate you to contribute more towards organizational goals?
9) Do you require further coaching for better understanding of PMS concept and doubts
clarification?
10) Do you feel that the existing system is effective one or any further improvement is
required to improve the system? If yes, please feel free to give your suggestions.
11) Do you feel the current system is better than earlier Appraisal system in Visaka? If
yes/No state the reasons.
NO
YES
OS
OS
NO
YES
OS
OS
OS
OS
OS
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
64/65
12) Did you face any problems while implementing PMS? If so mention.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
Performance Management, A.S KOHLI, TAPOMOY DEB
Performance Management and Appraisal Systems, T.V. RAO
Performance Managementand Culture,SETHI DIPTI GAGAN
Booklet on the companys profile
OS
OS
-
8/7/2019 Final Report-on PMS
65/65
WEBSITE
www.citehr.com
www.visaka.in
www.wikipedia.com