FINAL REMEDIAL DESIGN TREATABILITY STUDY REPORT - …of Central Services (DCS) Construction and...
Transcript of FINAL REMEDIAL DESIGN TREATABILITY STUDY REPORT - …of Central Services (DCS) Construction and...
FINAL
REMEDIAL DESIGN TREATABILITY STUDY REPORT
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING COLLINSVILLE, OKLAHOMA
JANUARY 2013
Prepared for
Oklahoma
Department of Environmental Quality
DCS Project # 12069C / PO# 2929014842
Burns & McDonnell Project No. 64496 Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company
Engineers-Architects-Consultants Kansas City, Missouri
007640
Treatability Study Report Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_TOC.docx TC-1 1/15/2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... TC-2 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. TC-2 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................. TC-3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1
1.1 Report Organization ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Site Background and Selected Remedy ................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Overview of the Treatability Study ......................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Remedial Technology Description .......................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Treatability Study Objectives .................................................................................. 1-4
2.0 BENCH TESTING ........................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 Soil and Sediment Sample Collection ..................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stabilization Reagents ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Bench Test ............................................................................................................... 2-2
3.0 FIELD TESTING ............................................................................................................. 3-1
3.1 Field Test ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Soil ..................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Sediment .................................................................................................................. 3-3
4.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1 Bench Test ............................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Field Test ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Full Scale Application and Estimated Cost ............................................................. 4-2
4.3.2 Full Scale Reagent Application ................................................................... 4-2 4.3.3 Full Scale Treatability Application Cost Estimate ...................................... 4-3
5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 5-1
APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Field Log Book APPENDIX B - Analytical Laboratory Reports for Bench Testing APPENDIX C - Field Treatability Photographic Log APPENDIX D - Analytical Laboratory Data for Field Testing APPENDIX E - Preliminary Waste Volume Calculations
007641
Treatability Study Report Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_TOC.docx TC-2 1/15/2013
LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title
1-1 Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for the Toxicity Characteristic (40 CFR 261.24)
2-1 RI/RD Soil/Sediment Results Exceeding 40 CFR 261.24 Criteria 2-2 Bench Scale Treatability Study Results
3-1 Field Test Treatability Study Results
LIST OF FIGURES Table No. Title 2-1 RI and RD Soil Results (0-0.5 BGS)
2-2 RI and RD Sediment Results (0-0.5 BGS)
007642
Treatability Study Report Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_TOC.docx TC-3 1/15/2013
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ALS ALS Laboratories of Houston, Texas bgs below ground surface BMcD Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. CA Cooperative Agreement CFR Code of Federal Regulations DCS Oklahoma Department of Central Services FS feasibility study Ft feet IC institutional control lb pound LTM long-term monitoring mg/L milligrams per liter NCP National Contingency Plan ODEQ Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality O&M operation and maintenance RA remedial action RD remedial design RI remedial investigation ROD Record of Decision SPLP Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure SOW Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel &
Manufacturing Superfund Site TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure TFM Site Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing site in Collinsville, Oklahoma USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency yd3 cubic yard
* * * * *
007643
Treatability Study Report Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_01.docx 1-1 1/15/2013
INTRODUCTION 1.0
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), under contract with the Oklahoma Department
of Central Services (DCS) Construction and Properties Division (DCS Project #12069C / PO#
2929014842) on behalf of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), is conducting a
remedial design (RD) for the Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing site in Collinsville, Oklahoma (TFM Site).
The RD is 100 percent federally funded through a Cooperative Agreement (CA) between the ODEQ and
the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
This Remedial Design Treatability Study Report has been prepared by BMcD, as required in the
Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund
Site ([SOW] ODEQ, 2011) Task 8.0, Treatability Study and Pilot Testing. The following presents a
description of the treatability study (i.e., bench test and field test) performed in conjunction with the RD
at the TFM Site.
REPORT ORGANIZATION 1.1
The Remedial Design Treatability Study Report is organized as follows:
• Section 1.0 – Introduction
• Section 2.0 – Bench Testing
• Section 3.0 – Field Testing
• Section 4.0 – Summary
• Section 5.0 – References
SITE BACKGROUND AND SELECTED REMEDY 1.2
A detailed summary of the TFM Site background is included in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the Remedial
Design Work Plan (BMcD, 2012).
A remedial investigation / feasibility study (RI/FS) was undertaken at the TFM Site from 2005 through
2007, and a Record of Decision (ROD) that describes the selected remedy for the TFM Site based on the
RI/FS was issued by the USEPA on November 24, 2008. The RD involves the design of a consolidation
cell and cap of TFM Site soil, sediment, and waste materials and waste materials present on properties
contiguous to the TFM Site that are contaminated with arsenic, cadmium, and/or lead.
007644
Treatability Study Report Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_01.docx 1-2 1/15/2013
Based on data obtained during the RI, the soil, sediment, and waste materials to be consolidated may
exceed the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level and may be a
characteristic hazardous waste under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261.24 (See Table 1-1 for
regulatory levels). Confirmation TCLP sampling was conducted on the soil, sediment, and waste material
during the RD field investigation.1 Since materials are being left on-site, long-term monitoring (LTM),
site inspections, operation and maintenance (O&M), institutional controls (ICs), and five-year reviews
will be required (USEPA, 2008) as part of the remedy.
A summary of each of the remedies for the on-Site materials, as outlined in the ROD, is provided in the
following paragraphs:
• On-Site Soil and Waste Materials: The selected remedy for on-Site soil and waste materials
includes the consolidation and capping of waste materials that exceed the cleanup levels for
residential or nonresidential arsenic, cadmium, and lead. Confirmation soil sampling will be
conducted in each area of excavation to ensure cleanup levels have been met and all contaminated
soil and waste material has been removed and placed within the consolidation cell (USEPA,
2008).
• Sediment and Surface Water: The selected remedy for the on-Site Ponds, Mid-Site Ravine, and
Strip Mine Pit includes on-site fixation or stabilization and on-site disposal of materials that
exceed the sediment cleanup levels. The areas will be dewatered; sediment will be excavated as
appropriate; and sediment will be consolidated and capped on site. Confirmation sampling will
be conducted in each area of excavation to ensure cleanup levels have been met and all
contaminated sediment has been removed and placed within the consolidation cell (USEPA,
2008).
OVERVIEW OF THE TREATABILITY STUDY 1.3
This Remedial Design Treatability Study Report has been prepared to summarize the sampling, laboratory
bench-scale analysis, and field treatability testing for soils and sediments associated with the TFM Site.
1 The majority of the TFM site consists of a mixture of fine and large waste material. During the RD field investigation, no separating, crushing, or sampling of the large waste material was performed. Only waste material that was sufficiently small enough to not require manipulation such as crushing, grinding, or sieving was submitted to the laboratory for TCLP analysis. Preparation steps that involve physically changing the particle size of the tested material creates samples that are not representative of site conditions and fundamentally alters the sample’s analytical performance. Therefore, only waste materials with small particle size, having the appearance of soil, were submitted for laboratory analysis of TCLP.
007645
Treatability Study Report Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_01.docx 1-3 1/15/2013
The treatability study was performed to identify treatment amendments capable of stabilizing the metals
contaminated soil and sediment. Such amendments are available in a number of different formulations,
and blends including magnesia buffered phosphates, phosphate fertilizers, sulfur, and/or magnesium oxide
were selected for testing. Soil and sediment from sample locations that are hazardous by characteristic
(i.e., results that exceed TCLP criteria) were selected for the treatability study. Sample locations for
treatability analysis were selected based on the results presented in the Final Remedial Investigation
Report (BMcD, 2007) and results of samples collected during the RD field investigation (BMcD, 2013).
REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION 1.4
Stabilization is an effective and well proven treatment for soil and sediment impacted by heavy metals
and is a widely used treatment technology to prevent migration of contamination from a contaminated
media. Stabilization refers to the process that involves a chemical reaction that reduces the leachability of
a waste, so it chemically immobilizes the waste and reduces its solubility, making the material less
harmful or less mobile (USEPA, 2009).
Stabilization treatment is identified in the National Contingency Plan (NCP) as a permanent remedial
alternative for treatment of waste material containing inorganics. Stabilization typically involves mixing
a binding agent into the contaminated media. This can be performed in-situ, by injecting the binding
agent into the contaminated media, or by excavating the materials and machine-mixing them with the
binding agent. Common inorganic binding reagents include cement, fly ash, lime, soluble silicates, or
phosphates (USEPA, 2009). In addition, proprietary reagents are also available to use as binding agents.
The ratio of binding agents to unstabilized material is typically determined by bench-scale treatability
studies, and field pilot testing is often performed to confirm bench-scale results and refine the
stabilization process. Binding reagents can be added in a dry state, with water added as necessary or in a
slurried state, with the goal to achieve a homogeneous mixture (USEPA, 2009).
Stabilization costs vary according to site, contaminants, and ex-situ or in-situ treatment. Average costs
for large-scale ex-situ treatment (approximately 50,000 cubic yards [yd3]) generally cost from $70 to $145
per yd3 (USEPA, 2009). The major cost drivers for ex-situ stabilization are: moisture content,
contaminant type, and system size. Higher percent moisture content increases the amount of reagent
required for treatment. Contaminant concentration and type determine the amount and type of reagents
added to achieve the treatment standards. The volume of binding reagent required for ex-situ treatment
can be as low as one percent for proprietary agents and as much as 30 percent per volume of soil treated.
Excessive addition of binding reagents can increase volume resulting in higher treatment and disposal
costs (USEPA, 2009).
007646
Treatability Study Report Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_01.docx 1-4 1/15/2013
Full-scale treatment application for the TFM Site could include in-situ treatment where the soil and/or
sediment are treated in place and then consolidated within an area of contamination, or full-scale
application could include ex-situ treatment where the soil and/or sediment are removed and treated, and
then, upon stabilization, placed in the on-site consolidation cell.
TREATABILITY STUDY OBJECTIVES 1.5
The objective of the treatability study is to identify stabilization reagents which will improve the chemical
and physical characteristics of the soil and sediment. Stabilization treatment has historically been used to
reduce leachable concentrations of the contaminants of concern. While some reduction in total
concentrations may be observed, the primary function of stabilization is to reduce the leachability of
contaminants from the treated matrix and to improve physical characteristics for handling and final
placement.
* * * * *
007647
Treatability Study Report Bench Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_02.docx 2-1 1/15/2013
2.0 BENCH TESTING
2.1 SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION
Soil and sediment materials for the bench test were collected from locations where RI data and RD data
indicated materials are hazardous by characteristic for arsenic, cadmium, and/or lead (Figure 2-1 and
Figure 2-2). A summary of the RI and RD soil and sediment samples that exhibited results in excess of
the TCLP criteria at any depth interval are provided on Table 2-1.
On May 31, 2012, a composite soil sample was collected from the 0 to 0.5 feet below ground surface (ft
bgs) interval on the western portion of the Site (TR-30, TR-50, and SP-36) and the area directly southwest
of Pond 2 (TR-05 and TR-24) where TCLP criteria exceedances of cadmium and lead were present
(Figure 2-1). The composite sample consisted of a soil and fine grain waste matrix passed through a ¼-
inch sieve. On May 31, 2012 a composite sediment sample was also collected from the 0 to 0.5 ft bgs
interval at four locations along the Mid-Site Ravine (MSR-04, MSR-05, MSR-07, and MSR-08) as
indicated on Figure 2-2. Each of the four sediment sample locations exceeded the TCLP criteria for
cadmium. The composite sample consisted of a fine grained sediment/waste mixture and was passed
through a ¼-inch sieve. The soil and sediment composite samples were sent to ALS Laboratories of
Houston, Texas (ALS) on May 31, 2012 for bench testing. A copy of the field logbook for the sample
collection is provided as Appendix A.
Samples were screened with a ¼-inch sieve prior to collection so that the waste material would be
sufficiently small enough not to require manipulation such at crushing, grinding, or sieving at the
laboratory as required for large-sized particles in USEPA Method SW-846 1311. Preparation steps that
involve physically changing the particle size of the tested waste material would have created samples that
were not representative of site conditions. Altering the sample’s physical size would have fundamentally
altered the samples analytical performance due to the increased surface area and would not have been an
accurate representation of the performance of larger pieces of waste material within the consolidation cell.
2.2 STABILIZATION REAGENTS
Based upon a review of literature and commercially available information, the following soil stabilization
reagents were used for the bench test:
• EnviroBlend 90/10® - The original patented EnviroBlend® chemistry is a magnesia buffered
phosphate that binds with the metals of concern, and stabilizes the pH of the environment to
ensure long-term treatment (i.e., reduced leachability).
007648
Treatability Study Report Bench Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_02.docx 2-2 1/15/2013
• Triple Super Phosphate® - Triple Super Phosphate® is a type of phosphate fertilizer that has been
used for immobilizing and stabilizing metals in contaminated soils and sediment. Triple Super
Phosphate® is produced by the action of phosphoric acid on ground phosphate rock, yielding an
active ingredient of monocalcium phosphate. The phosphorus content of Triple Super
Phosphate® is 17 to 23 percent phosphorus, or 44 to 52 percent measured as phosphorus
pentoxide.
• TerraBond® - TerraBond® is a proprietary sulfur blend used for stabilization of metals in
contaminated soil and other media. It is composed of 40 to 60 percent of a proprietary sulfur
blend, 30 to 40 percent calcium hydroxide, and lesser amounts of calcium carbonate, calcium
chloride, and other inert ingredients.
• FreeFlow 300® - FreeFlow 300® is a proprietary magnesium oxide blend used for stabilization of
metals in contaminated soil and other media. It is composed of 25 to 60 percent of a proprietary
magnesium oxide blend, 40 to 60 percent calcium oxide, 10 to 25 percent sulfur, and lesser
amounts of silicon dioxide, aluminum oxide, and iron oxide.
2.3 BENCH TEST
Preliminary Testing
Preliminary analyses were performed by ALS on the soil and sediment composites, to verify the
suitability of the soil and sediment for use in the bench test. The results of the untreated soil had TCLP
exceedances of cadmium (9.25 milligrams per liter [mg/L]) and lead (26.8 mg/L), and the untreated
sediment had a TCLP exceedance of cadmium (3.27 mg/L). Table 2-2 presents the results of the
untreated composite samples.
Bench Test Results
Appendix B presents all analytical laboratory reports completed for bench testing, and the bench scale
results after the addition of various stabilization reagents is also summarized on Table 2-2.
The initial bench test completed by ALS consisted of mixing three different commercially available soil
stabilization reagents (EnviroBlend®, Triple Super Phosphate®, and TerraBond®) at three different ratios
of soil (wet weight) and the stabilization reagent. The following reagent and percentages by weight were
initially mixed with the soil and sediment samples:
• EnviroBlend 90/10® 1%, 2%, and 3% by wet weight of soil
007649
Treatability Study Report Bench Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_02.docx 2-3 1/15/2013
• Triple Super Phosphate® 1%, 2%, and 3% by wet weight of soil
• TerraBond® 2%, 3%, and 4% by wet weight of soil
Each of the samples was analyzed for TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead after mixing with the above
mentioned reagent/percentage weight ratios had occurred.
All cadmium TCLP results in soil and sediment of the above mixtures were above the TCLP criteria (see
Table 2-2). In addition, lead TCLP results in soil were above the TCLP criteria for Enviroblend ® (1%),
Triple Super Phosphate® (1%), and TerraBond® (2%, 3%, and 4%).
Untreated soil was then mixed with an 8% and 10% by weight mixture of Triple Super Phosphate® in an
effort to achieve cadmium TCLP results below the 1 mg/L TCLP criteria. The additional percentages of
Triple Super Phosphate® did not yield cadmium TCLP results below the criteria, and it was deemed
impractical to continue any additional bench testing or field testing of Triple Super Phosphate®.
Untreated soil and sediment samples were sent from ALS to the EnviroBlend and TerraBond reagent
vendors for additional bench testing. An untreated soil sample was also sent to a reagent vendor of Free
Flow Technologies, Ltd. for bench testing of Free Flow 300® as an additional stabilization reagent option,
since Triple Super Phosphate® was deemed ineffective.
The additional bench testing provided by EnviroBlend included various reagent mixtures and percentages
by weight for both the soil and sediment samples as indicated on Table 2-2. Results from the
EnviroBlend bench test indicated that EnviroBlend CS® at 10% and 11% by weight were the lowest
effective reagent/soil mixture to yield cadmium and lead TCLP results below the TCLP criteria.
Sediment results indicated that EnviroBlend CS® at 7% and 8% by weight were the lowest effective
reagent/sediment mixture to yield cadmium and lead TCLP results below the TCLP criteria.
Soil and sediment samples were mixed with TerraBond-LA® at 6%, 7%, and 8% by weight during bench
testing performed by the TerraBond reagent vendor. Results from the TerraBond bench test indicate that
TerraBond-LA® at 7% and 8% by weight were the lowest effective soil and sediment/reagent mixture to
yield cadmium and lead results below the TCLP criteria.
Free Flow Technologies Ltd. utilized the reagent Free Flow 300® for a soil/reagent mixture of 5% and 8%
by weight. Both the Free Flow 300® at 5% and 8% were effective in producing TCLP results below the
criteria (Table 2-2) for soil. It was assumed that the Free Flow 300® at 5% and 8% would be as effective
in the sediment matrix as in the soil matrix during bench testing.
007650
Treatability Study Report Bench Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_02.docx 2-4 1/15/2013
Based upon the results of the bench test, the two lowest effective ratios of reagent to soil/sediment matrix
were selected for field testing for each reagent. Therefore, six batches of reagent mixtures were selected
for field testing for each matrix (i.e., three reagents X two dosage ratios per reagent). The soil/sediment
to reagent mixtures recommended for use during the field test were as follows:
• Soil
EnviroBlend CS® – 10% and 11% by wet weight of soil
TerraBond-LA® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of soil
Free Flow 300® – 5% and 8% by wet weight of soil
• Sediment
EnviroBlend CS® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of sediment
TerraBond-LA® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of sediment
Free Flow 300® – 5% and 8% by wet weight of sediment (assumed to be the same as soil)
* * * * *
007651
Treatability Study Report Field Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_03.docx 3-1 1/15/2013
3.0 FIELD TESTING
3.1 FIELD TEST
The full-scale field test was performed on both soil and sediment from September 19 through 20, 2012.
Based on the bench test results, the two lowest ratios of reagent to soil/sediment matrix were field tested
for each reagent. That is, six batches were field tested for each matrix (i.e., three reagents X two dosage
ratios per reagent). The soil/sediment to reagent mixtures used during the field test were as follows:
• Soil
EnviroBlend CS® – 10% and 11% by wet weight of soil
TerraBond-LA® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of soil
Free Flow 300® – 5% and 8% by wet weight of soil
• Sediment
EnviroBlend CS® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of sediment
TerraBond-LA® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of sediment
Free Flow 300® – 5% and 8% by wet weight of sediment (assumed to be the same as soil)
The soil and sediment used in the full-scale field test were obtained from the same locations as the soil
and sediment that were used in the bench test and included all sizes of waste material present at the
selected locations. That is, no separation or physical alteration of waste materials was performed during
the field test. Soil and sediment were evaluated separately.
Approximately 10 cubic yards of soil/sediment was excavated and placed in a mixing container (sealed
roll-off container). The unit weight, as determined during the bench test, was used to calculate the weight
of the soil and sediment. Using the soil/sediment weight and treatment ratios developed in the bench test,
the appropriate amount of reagent was added, and the soil/sediment and reagent were mixed using a
hydraulic excavator equipped with a smooth edge bucket. After completion of mixing, a sample was
collected and submitted to ALS for analysis of TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead. Samples submitted for
TCLP analysis consisted of fine grained materials that did not have to be physically altered to be
analyzed. (A similar sampling approach will be used during the remedial action (RA) to ensure
007652
Treatability Study Report Field Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_03.docx 3-2 1/15/2013
comparable results to the field test).1 The process was repeated for each of the stabilization reagents and
dosage ratios determined for soil and sediment.
After sample collection of each batch was completed the soil/reagent mixture was removed from the
mixing container and placed back in the excavation and restored to the original grade. Sediment/reagent
batches were removed from the mixing container after sample collection and placed on the ground surface
in the area of mixing. Once all sediment/reagent mixing batches were completed, and removed from the
mixing container, the treated sediment was graded to blend in with the existing grade.
The logbook and photographs of the field testing are provided in Appendices A and C, respectively.
Analytical laboratory results for field testing are presented in Appendix D.
3.2 SOIL
Soil used for the field test was excavated from 0 to 1.0 ft in the vicinity of TR-30. The soil excavation
location was selected since TR-30 exhibited the highest TCLP concentration for cadmium (12.6 mg/L),
exceeded the TCLP criteria for lead (10.2 mg/L), and included a representative mixture of media
(soil/waste/fine grained waste) that is present at the TFM Site. Table 3-1 presents the results of the
respective soil/reagent mixtures completed during the treatability field test.
EnviroBlend CS®
Soil was mixed with EnviroBlend CS® at 10% and 11% by weight of soil. The following quantities of
soil and EnviroBlend CS® were mixed to achieve the respective mixture percentages: 10% - 34,000
pounds (lbs) of soil mixed with 3,400 lbs of EnviroBlend CS® and 11% - 34,000 lbs of soil mixed with
3,740 lbs of EnviroBlend CS®. There were no TCLP exceedances noted for the EnviroBlend CS® 10%
mixture; however, an exceedance of TCLP cadmium was noted in the 11% mixture.
TerraBond LA®
Soil was mixed with TerraBond LA® at 7% and 8% by weight of soil. The following quantities of soil
1 Samples were screened with a ¼-inch sieve prior to collection so that the waste material would be sufficiently small enough not to require manipulation such at crushing, grinding, or sieving at the laboratory as required for large-sized particles in USEPA Method SW-846 1311. Preparation steps that involve physically changing the particle size of the tested waste material would have created samples that were not representative of site conditions. Altering the sample’s physical size would have fundamentally altered the samples analytical performance due to the increased surface area and would not have been an accurate representation of the performance of larger pieces of waste material within the consolidation cell.
007653
Treatability Study Report Field Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_03.docx 3-3 1/15/2013
and TerraBond LA® were mixed to achieve the respective mixture percentages: 7% - 34,000 lbs of soil
mixed with 2,380 lbs of TerraBond LA® and 8% - 34,000 lbs of soil mixed with 2,720 lbs of TerraBond
LA®. The TerraBond LA® 7% mixture exceeded the TCLP criteria of cadmium and lead, and the
TerraBond LA® 8% mixture exceeded the TCLP criteria of cadmium. In particular, the TCLP cadmium
results were higher after treatment than prior to treatment.
Free Flow 300®
Soil was mixed with Free Flow 300® at 5% and 8% by weight of soil. The following quantities of soil
and Free Flow 300® were mixed to achieve the respective mixture percentages: 5% - 34,000 lbs of soil
mixed with 1,700 lbs of Free Flow 300® and 8% - 34,000 lbs of soil mixed with 2,720 lbs of Free Flow
300®. The Free Flow 300® 5% and 8% mixtures exceeded the TCLP criteria of cadmium; however,
results for TCLP cadmium were only slightly above criteria in the 8% mixture. The Free Flow 300® 5%
and 8% mixture ratios were utilized during the field test, based upon effective bench test results at the
respective percentages. However, the vendor has suggested that a 10% mixture of Free Flow 300® should
achieve acceptable stabilization criteria.
3.3 SEDIMENT
Sediment used for the field test was excavated from the Mid Site Ravine from locations that had
exceedances of the cadmium TCLP criteria, including between locations MSR-04 (5.1 mg/L) and MSR-
05 (1.45 mg/L), as well as between locations MSR-07 (3.51 mg/L) and MSR-08 (1.97 mg/L). These
areas were identified during the RD, and contained a representative mixture of sediment and fine grained
waste that is present at the TFM Site. Table 3-1 presents the results of the respective sediment/reagent
mixtures completed during the treatability field test.
EnviroBlend CS®
Sediment was mixed with EnviroBlend CS® at 7% and 8% by weight of sediment. The following
quantities of soil and EnviroBlend CS® were mixed to achieve the respective mixture percentages: 7% -
34,000 lbs of sediment mixed with 2,380 lbs of EnviroBlend CS® and 8% - 34,000 lbs of sediment with
2,720 lbs of EnviroBlend CS®. There were no TCLP exceedances noted for the EnviroBlend CS® at 7%
or 8% sediment/reagent mixtures.
TerraBond LA®
Sediment was mixed with TerraBond LA® at 7% and 8% by weight of sediment. The following
007654
Treatability Study Report Field Testing Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_03.docx 3-4 1/15/2013
quantities of soil and TerraBond LA® were mixed to achieve the respective mixture percentages: 7% -
34,000 lbs of sediment mixed with 2,380 lbs of TerraBond LA® and 8% - 34,000 lbs of sediment mixed
with 2,720 lbs of TerraBond LA®. The TerraBond LA® 7% mixture did not have any TCLP exceedences;
however, the TerraBond LA® 8% mixture exceeded the TCLP criteria of cadmium.
Free Flow 300®
Sediment was mixed with Free Flow 300® at 5% and 8% by weight of sediment. The following quantities
of sediment and Free Flow 300® were mixed to achieve the respective mixture percentages: 5% - 34,000
lbs of sediment mixed with 1,700 lbs of Free Flow 300® and 8% - 34,000 lbs of sediment mixed with
2,720 lbs of Free Flow 300®. The Free Flow 300® 5% mixture exceeded the TCLP criteria of cadmium
and lead. TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead were not detected in the Free Flow 300® 8% mixture.
* * * * *
007655
Treatability Study Report Summary Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_04.docx 4-1 1/15/2013
SUMMARY 4.0
The objective of the treatability study was to identify reagents capable of stabilizing the metals
contaminated soil and sediment at the TFM Site that exceeded TCLP criteria outlined in 40 CFR 261.24.
The primary function of stabilization was to reduce the leachability of contaminants from the treated
matrix and to improve physical characteristics for handling and final placement. Soil and sediment from
sample locations that were identified during the RI and RD as hazardous by characteristic (i.e., results that
exceed TCLP criteria) were selected for the treatability study. Treatability study activities included soil
and sediment sampling, bench-scale testing, and full-scale field testing.
4.1 BENCH TEST
Soil and sediment samples were collected from locations where RI and RD data indicated that materials
were hazardous by characteristic for arsenic, cadmium, and/or lead. Samples were submitted to ALS for
bench-scale testing of EnviroBlend 90/10®, Triple Super Phosphate®, and TerraBond®. The initial bench-
scale tests evaluated the performance of three concentrations of each reagent in soil and sediment. None
of the initial tests, which evaluated reagent concentrations ranging from 1% to 4%, produced acceptable
results. Additional testing using higher concentrations of Triple Super Phosphate® was performed by
ALS; however, acceptable results were not achieved using concentrations of 8% or 10% Triple Super
Phosphate® . At this point, it was deemed impractical to continue bench testing or field testing of Triple
Super Phosphate®.
Untreated soil and sediment samples were submitted to reagent vendors EnviroBlend and TerraBond for
additional testing in their facilities. In addition, a soil sample was submitted to reagent vendor Free Flow
Technologies Ltd. for bench testing of Free Flow 300®. Results of the additional vendor bench testing
yielded sample results that were less than TCLP criteria. Based on this additional testing, the two lowest
effective ratios of reagent to soil/sediment matrix were recommended for full-scale field testing as
follows:
• Soil
EnviroBlend CS® – 10% and 11% by wet weight of soil
TerraBond-LA® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of soil
Free Flow 300® – 5% and 8% by wet weight of soil
• Sediment
EnviroBlend CS® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of sediment
TerraBond-LA® – 7% and 8% by wet weight of sediment
007656
Treatability Study Report Summary Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_04.docx 4-2 1/15/2013
Free Flow 300® – 5% and 8% by wet weight of sediment (assumed to be the same as soil)
4.2 FIELD TEST
Based on recommendations from the bench tests, full-scale field testing was completed for the two lowest
effective ratios of reagent to soil/sediment matrix (soil – six batches, sediment – six batches) to evaluate
the effectiveness of the stabilization reagents for full-scale implementation during the RA. A summary
for each reagent is provided in the following paragraphs:
• EnviroBlend CS® – EnviroBlend CS® was effective at stabilizing sediment at both 7% and 8%
mixture ratios, and it was effective at stabilizing soil at a 10% mixture. The Enviroblend CS® at
an 11% mixture in soil did not meet the TCLP stabilization criteria for cadmium.
• TerraBond-LA® – TerraBond-LA® failed to adequately stabilize soil and sediment in a majority
of the reagent batches. In particular, TCLP cadmium results for TerraBond-LA® stabilized soils
appeared higher than non-stabilized soil. TerraBond-LA® was eliminated as a viable option for
full-scale implementation.
• Free Flow 300® – Free Flow 300® did not meet TCLP criteria for cadmium or lead in a 5%
mixture with sediment, but was effective at an 8% mixture with sediment. Both Free Flow 300®
mixtures at 5% and 8% with soil had TCLP exceedances of cadmium; however, the exceedance
for the 8% mixture was minimal. The Free Flow 300® 5% and 8% mixture ratios were utilized
during the field test, based upon effective bench test results at the respective percentages.
However, the reagent vendor recommended using a 10% mixture for soil to achieve acceptable
results.
4.3 FULL SCALE APPLICATION AND ESTIMATED COST
4.3.1 Full Scale Reagent Application
Multiple reagents were tested in bench-scale and/or field-scale treatability tests of soil and sediment from
the TFM Site, including EnviroBlend 90/10®, Triple Super Phosphate®, TerraBond® LA, EnviroMag
Coarse, EnviroBlend CS, and Free Flow 300®. Based upon the results of the field test in combination
with anticipated full scale application conditions, the following reagent to soil/sediment ratios are
anticipated to provide acceptable stabilization during full scale application:
007657
Treatability Study Report Summary Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_04.docx 4-3 1/15/2013
• Soil
EnviroBlend CS® – 10% to 11% by wet weight of soil
Free Flow 300® – 10% by wet weight of soil
• Sediment
EnviroBlend CS® – 7% to 8% by wet weight of sediment
Free Flow 300® – 8% by wet weight of sediment
It should be noted that both the bench-scale and field tests were performed such that fine-grained
materials were preferentially studied. These fine-grained materials represent the likely worst-case
conditions for the TFM Site. The soil and sediment used in the full-scale field test were obtained from the
same locations as the soil and sediment that was used in the bench test but included all sizes of waste
material present at the selected locations. That is, no separation or physical alteration of waste materials
was performed during reagent application in the field test. The application of reagents in the field test
included all waste materials (regardless of size) present at the selected field testing locations. However,
samples submitted for confirmation TCLP analysis after stabilization were screened through a ¼-inch
sieve to minimize sample preparation steps (i.e., sample crushing, grinding, and sieving) at the analytical
laboratory, and test the success of stabilization of fine-grained wastes at the TFM Site.
4.3.2 Full Scale Treatability Application Cost Estimate
The quantities of soil and sediment requiring stabilization that were used to estimate the cost of full scale
treatability application were obtained from the Final Remedial Design Data Evaluation Report (BMcD,
2013). The quantity of soil that will require stabilization was derived from the estimated depth of waste
present throughout the TFM Site. Since waste was correlated with exceedances of TCLP criteria during
the RI and RD investigation, this approach was used to estimate the volume of materials for treatment.
Appendix E presents a figure and table depicting the estimated depths of waste present throughout the
TFM Site that was used as the basis for estimated quantity of waste. Since various sizes of waste
materials are co-mingled throughout the TFM Site and the finer-grained materials (i.e., soil/waste mix,
fine grained waste/broken retort mix, etc.) have consistently exceeded TCLP criteria, it was assumed that
some form of stabilization would be required for the entirety of the waste area. That is, this cost estimate
does not include any attempt to separate larger chunks of waste material from the fine-grained materials.
The cost estimate for full scale treatability implementation utilizing the recommended reagent
soil/sediment ratios from the full scale field test is as follows:
007658
Treatability Study Report Summary Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_04.docx 4-4 1/15/2013
Reagent Dosage Estimated Volume
(cubic yard)
Estimated
Quantity
(Tons)1
Unit
Price/Ton2
Total Price
Soil
EnviroBlend CS® 11% 146,000 219,000 $56.59 $12,393,210
Free Flow 300®3 10% 146,000 219,000 $103.53 $22,673,070
Sediment
EnviroBlend CS® 8% 520 676 $43.91 $29,680
Free Flow 300® 8% 520 676 $88.00 $59,490 1 A conversion factor of 1.5 tons/cubic yard was utilized for soil due to waste density, and a conversion factor of 1.3 tons/cubic yard was utilized for sediment.
2 Unit price includes in-situ treatment and testing of impacted soil/sediment, as well as procurement, delivery, and application of reagent. An estimate of unit costs was obtained from Remediation Services, Inc., which was the treatability study subcontractor.
3 The Free Flow 300® 5% and 8% mixture ratios were utilized during the field test, based upon effective bench test results at the respective percentages. TCLP cadmium did not pass TCLP criteria during the field test, and the vendor has suggested that a 10% mixture of Free Flow 300® should achieve acceptable stabilization criteria. Therefore, a soil dosage of 10% was selected for purposes of developing the cost estimate.
* * * * *
007659
Treatability Study Report References Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Treatability Study Rpt_05.docx 5-1 1/15/2013
5.0 REFERENCES
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007. Final Remedial Investigation Report for
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma. August.
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2012. Remedial Design Work Plan, Tulsa
Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma. February 6. (RD Work Plan)
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2013. Final Remedial Design Data
Evaluation Report, Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma.
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 2011, Consultant Statement of Work for the
Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site, August.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2008. Record of Decision. Tulsa Fuel &
Manufacturing Superfund Site, Collinsville, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. November.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2009. Technology Performance Review:
Selecting and Using Solidification/Stabilization Treatment for Site Remediation, EPA/600/R-
09/148 . November.
* * * * *
007660
TABLES
007661
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\Treatability Study Report\Final\Tables\Table 1-1 TCLP Criteria.xlsxTable 1-1
Page 1 of 1
Table 1-1Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for the
Toxicity Characteristic (40 CFR 261.24)Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design
Parameter UnitsTCLP Regulatory
LevelArsenic, TCLP mg/l 5.0Cadmium, TCLP mg/l 1.0Lead, TCLP mg/l 5.0
CFR - Code of Federal Regulationsmg/l - milligrams per literTCLP - toxicity characteristic leaching procedure
007662
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\Treatability Study Report\Final\Tables\Table 2-1 TCLP Results.xlsxTable 2-1
Page 1 of 1
RI/RD Soil/Sediment Results Exceeding 40 CFR 261.24 Criteria Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design
Sample Point
Sample Designator
Depth Interval (ft bgs)
Date Collected Sample Media Description Units
SoilSP-36 SS01 0.0-0.5 08/01/05 Silt and Fine Sand mg/l 0.05 U 1.69 3.93SP-39 SS02 0.5-2.0 07/29/05 Slag and Fine to Medium Sand mg/l 0.058 1.64 18.5TR-01 SS02 2.5-3.0 07/26/05 Slag/Coarse to Fine Waste mg/l 0.05 U 2.87 72.6TR-05 SS01 0.0-0.5 07/26/05 Silt w/Slag Gravel mg/l 0.05 U 6.03 48.7TR-09 SS02 4.5-5.0 07/27/05 Slag/Coarse to Fine Waste mg/l 0.05 U 3.63 4.87
TR-1002 SS02 4.5-5.0 07/27/05 Field Duplicate of TR-09/SS02 mg/l 0.05 U 3.95 4.98TR-19 SS02 3.0-3.5 07/28/05 Slag/Coarse to Fine Waste mg/l 0.05 U 3.48 47.2TR-24 SS01 0.0-1.0 03/08/12 Fine Grained Waste mg/l 0.01 U 2.8 5.3TR-30 SS01 0.0-1.0 03/05/12 Silty Clay mg/l 0.626 12.6 10.2TR-50 SS01 0.0-0.5 03/08/12 Top Soil/Fine Waste mg/l 0.017 3.3 3.05
SedimentPD1-04 SD01 0.0-0.5 03/13/12 Sediment mg/l 0.01 U 1.07 0.648MSR-04 SD01 0.0-0.5 03/12/12 Sediment mg/l 0.01 U 5.1 1.21MSR-05 SD01 0.0-0.5 03/12/12 Sediment mg/l 0.01 U 1.45 0.424MSR-07 SD01 0.0-0.5 03/12/12 Sediment mg/l 0.01 U 3.51 0.662MSR-08 SD01 0.0-0.5 03/12/12 Fine Grained Waste/Sediment mg/l 0.01 U 1.97 3.73
SMPT-05-05 SD01 0.0-0.5 03/26/12 Fine Grained Waste/Sediment mg/l 0.0174 0.0438 9.46SMPT-10-05 SD01 0.0-0.5 03/26/12 Fine Grained Waste/Sediment mg/l 0.0256 2.04 0.296
Detection exceeded TCLP 40 CFR 261.24 CriteriaDetections are presented in Bold RI Remedial Investigation
bgs below ground surface RD Remedial DesignCFR Code of Federal Regulations TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
ft feet U Compound was not detectedmg/l milligrams per liter
Table 2-1
40 CFR 261.24 CriteriaArsenic Cadmium Lead
5 1 5
007663
1/15/2013 K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\Treatability Study Report\Final\Tables\Table 2-2 Bench Results Summary.xlsxTable 2-2
Page 1 of 1
ALS Global - Bench TestsTCLP Metals (mg/l) TCLP Metals (mg/l) TCLP Metals (mg/l) TCLP Metals (mg/l)
Arsenic Cadmium Lead Arsenic Cadmium Lead Arsenic Cadmium Lead Arsenic Cadmium LeadTCLP Criteria 5 1 5 TCLP Criteria 5 1 5 TCLP Criteria 5 1 5 TCLP Criteria 5 1 5Soil Soil Soil SoilUntreated 0.05 U 9.25 26.8 Untreated 0.03 U 7.06 29.6 Untreated 0.05 U 9.25 26.8 Free Flow 300 - 5% NA 0.002 0.002 UEnviroBlend 1% 0.05 U 6.79 13.8 EnviroMag Coarse 3% 0.03 U 3.32 2.95 TerraBond-LA 6% NA 2.73 0.362 Free Flow 300 - 8% NA 0.041 0.002 UEnviroBlend 2% 0.05 U 4.73 4.69 EnviroBlend CS 6% 0.03 U 4.47 7.24 TerraBond-LA 7% NA 0.112 0.2 UEnviroBlend 3% 0.05 U 3.5 1.77 EnviroBlend CS 7% 0.03 U 4.25 4.53 TerraBond-LA 8% NA 0.095 0.2 UTSP 1% 0.11 6.55 5.98 EnviroBlend CS 8% 0.03 U 3.46 3.46TSP 2% 0.193 5.8 3.05 EnviroBlend CS 10% 0.03 U 0.64 0.26TSP 3% 0.217 4.74 1.73 EnviroBlend CS 11% 0.03 U 0.041 0.11TSP 8% 0.254 1.65 0.354 EnviroBlend CS 12% 0.03 U 0.026 0.13TSP 10% 0.323 1.35 0.249TerraBond 2% 0.05 U 7.61 17.4TerraBond 3% 0.05 U 9.5 14.6TerraBond 4% 0.05 U 10.7 15.6Sediment Sediment SedimentUntreated 0.05 U 3.27 2.65 Untreated 0.03 U 2.79 2.2 Untreated 0.05 U 3.27 2.65EnviroBlend 1% 0.05 U 2.69 1.03 EnviroMag Coarse 3% 0.03 U 1.21 0.093 TerraBond-LA 6% NA 1.95 0.291EnviroBlend 2% 0.05 U 2.56 0.529 EnviroMag Coarse 4% 0.03 U 0.024 U 0.067 U TerraBond-LA 7% NA 0.165 0.2 UEnviroBlend 3% 0.05 U 1.51 0.0993 EnviroBlend CS 6% 0.03 U 2.3 0.31 TerraBond-LA 8% NA 0.05 U 0.2 UTSP 1% 0.141 3.82 0.803 EnviroBlend CS 7% 0.03 U 0.12 0.067 UTSP 2% 0.139 2.2 0.266 EnviroBlend CS 8% 0.03 U 0.027 0.067 UTSP 3% 0.194 2.56 0.208TerraBond 2% 0.05 U 4.09 3.89TerraBond 3% 0.05 U 5.33 3.94TerraBond 4% 0.05 U 5.03 3.49
Detections are presented in BoldDetection was above TCLP 40 CFR 261.24 Criteria
* Free Flow vendor utilized the untreated soil data provided by ALS Global.CFR Code of Federal Regulations
NA Not Analyzedmg/l milligram per Liter
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureTSP Triple Super Phosphate
U Compound was not detected
EnviroBlend - Bench Tests TerraBond - Bench Tests Free Flow - Bench Tests*
Table 2-2
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial DesignBench Scale Treatablity Study Results
007664
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\Treatability Study Report\Final\Tables\Table 3-1 Field Test Results.xlsxTable 3-1
Page 1 of 1
Field Test Treatability Study ResultsTulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design
Sample Point
Depth Interval (ft bgs)
Date Collected Units
Soil1
EnviroBlend CS 10% 0-1.0 09/19/12 mg/l 0.05 U 0.0814 0.05 UEnviroBlend CS 11% 0-1.0 09/19/12 mg/l 0.05 U 4.22 0.125
TerraBond LA 7% 0-1.0 09/19/12 mg/l 0.126 17.1 6.88TerraBond LA 8% 0-1.0 09/19/12 mg/l 0.981 15.6 1.4Free Flow 300 5% 0-1.0 09/19/12 mg/l 0.05 U 4.23 0.15Free Flow 300 8% 0-1.0 09/19/12 mg/l 0.05 U 1.49 0.05 U
Sediment2
EnviroBlend CS 7% 0-1.0 09/20/12 mg/l 0.05 U 0.499 0.05 UEnviroBlend CS 8% 0-1.0 09/20/12 mg/l 0.05 U 0.02 U 0.05 UTerraBond LA 7% 0-1.0 09/20/12 mg/l 0.05 U 0.02 U 0.05 UTerraBond LA 8% 0-1.0 09/20/12 mg/l 0.05 U 2.08 0.935Free Flow 300 5% 0-1.0 09/20/12 mg/l 0.05 U 2.60 6.03Free Flow 300 8% 0-1.0 09/20/12 mg/l 0.05 U 0.02 U 0.05 U
Detections are presented in BoldDetection was above TCLP screening
1
2
bgs below ground surfaceCFR Code of Federal Regulations
ft footmg/l milligram per liter
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureU Compound was not detected
Soil utilized during the field testing was collected within close proximity to TR-30, which was collected during the RD. TCLP results at TR-30 were as follows: Arsenic - 0.626 mg/l, Cadmium - 12.6 mg/l, and Lead - 10.2 mg/l.Sediment utilized during field testing was collected from locations MSR-04, MSR-05, MSR-07 and MSR-08. TCLP exceedences at these locations were limited to cadmium, which ranged from 1.45 mg/l to 5.1 mg/l.
Table 3-1
40 CFR 261.24 CriteriaArsenic Cadmium Lead
5 1 5
007665
FIGURES
007666
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
"Old" U.S.Highway 169
Atchinson TopekaSanta Fe Railroad
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
Pond 4
Pond 3
Access Road/Driveway
Intermitte
nt Drainage
Pond 1Pond 2
Pond 5
Strip Mine Pit
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
SP-60
SP-59SP-58SP-57
SP-56
SP-55
SP-54
TR-12
TR-04
TR-16
TR-17
TR-15TR-14
TR-18
TR-20
TR-08TR-09
TR-10TR-13
TR-19
TR-21
TR-03TR-06
TR-07TR-11
TR-02
TR-05
TR-01
SP-08
SP-12SP-14
SP-15
SP-07
SP-06
SP-05SP-04
SP-02
SP-47
SP-40
SP-53
SP-50SP-51SP-52
SP-49
SP-48SP-46
SP-41
SP-42SP-43
SP-44
SP-38
SP-37SP-36SP-35
SP-34
SP-39
SP-25SP-26
SP-27
SP-28
SP-30SP-31SP-32SP-33
SP-24
SP-23SP-22SP-21SP-20SP-19SP-18SP-17SP-16
SP-09SP-10SP-11SP-13
SP-03SP-01
SP-30
SP-45
SP-29
TR-37
TR-55TR-28
TR-29
TR-27 TR-26
TR-25
TR-54TR-41
TR-53
TR-31
TR-30
TR-32
TR-22
TR-33
TR-23 TR-24
TR-52
TR-40 TR-51TR-50 TR-49
TR-48
TR-46
TR-39
TR-45
TR-42
TR-43
TR-44
TR-34
TR-47 TR-38
TR-35
TR-36
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2012\Fig2-1_RI_RD_Soil_Results_Tulsa_Collinsville_OK.mxd sos Jan 11, 2013
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
RI AND RD SOIL RESULTS(0 - 0.5 BGS)
Figure 2-1
150 0 150
S C A L E I N F E E T
NORTH
LEGEND
Trenching/Test Pit Locations
Surface/Subsurface
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Hydrography
Roads
< Residential RAO
Sample result between residential &nonresidential RAO
> Non residential RAO
Waste present to at least 0 - 0.5 bgs.Samples for total metals were collectedat locations TR-01 through TR-21. Allsamples exceeded the nonresidential RAO
> TCLP criteria
Bench test composite soil samples were collectedfrom 0 - 0.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) atTR-05, TR-24, TR-30, TR-50, and SP-36.
Soil RAOs are as follows:Arsenic : Residential = 37 mg/Kg, Nonresidential = 200 mg/KgCadmium : Residential = 75 mg/Kg, Nonresidential = 60 mg/KgLead: Residential = 500 mg/Kg, Nonresidential = 1,000 mg/Kg
TCLP criteria are as follows:Arsenic = 5.0 mg/LCadmium = 1.0 mg/LLead = 5.0 mg/L
If any constituent exceeded the RAO & TCLP, then thelocation was highlighted as an exceedance.
mg/Kg = milligrams per kilogrammg/L = milligrams per literRAO = Remedial Action ObjectiveTCLP = Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procdure
NOTE:
007667
Strip MinePit
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Pond 5
Pond 4
Pond 3
Pond 2
Pond 1
Intermitte
nt Drainage
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
Access Road/Driveway
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
SMPT
-09
SMPT
-06
SMPT
-07
SMPT-01
SMPT
-08
SMPT-11
SMPT-12
SMPT-10
SMP
T-04
SMPT
-05
SMP
T-03
SMPT-02
PD5-01
PD4-03PD4-02
PD4-01
PD3-06PD3-05
PD3-04
PD3-03
PD3-02
PD3-01
PD2-06PD2-05
PD2-04
PD2-03
PD2-02
PD2-01
PD1-08
PD1-07
PD1-06PD1-05
PD1-04
PD1-03
PD1-02
PD1-01
MSR-08MSR-07
MSR-06MSR-05
MSR-04
MSR-03MSR-02
MSR-01
SMPT-12-05
SMPT-11-50
SMPT-11-05
SMPT-10-05
SMPT-09-05
SMPT-08-50
SMPT-05-05
SMPT-03-05
SMPT-01-05
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2012\Fig2-2_RI_RD_Sediment_Result_0_Half_Ft_Collinsville_OK.mxd sos Jan 11, 2013
150 0 150
S C A L E I N F E E T
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
RI AND RD SEDIMENT RESULTS(0 - 0.5 BGS)
Figure 2-2
NORTH
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Hydrography
Strip Mine Pit Transect
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Roads
> Residential/Nonresidential RAO
> TCLP criteria> Residential/Nonresidential RAOand TCLP criteriaSediment Sample collected during theRemedial Investigation (RI)Sediment Sample collected during theRemedial Design (RD)
PD4
MSR Mid Site RavinePD5 Pond 5
Pond 4PD3 Pond 3PD2 Pond 2PD1 Pond 1
SMPT Strip Mine Pit Transect
Bench test composite sediment samples were collectedfrom 0 - 0.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) at MSR-04,MSR-05, MSR-07, and MSR-08.
Sediment samples collected during the RI wereanalyzed for total metals only.
Sediment samples collected during the RDfrom Pond 1, Pond 2, Pond 3, Pond 4,and the Mid-Site Ravine were analyzed for TCLP only.
Sediment samples collected during the RD fromthe Strip Mine Pit were selected based uponvisual inspections of core samples and analyzedfor total metals and TCLP.
Sediment Residential/Nonresidential RAOs are asfollows:Arsenic = 181 mg/KgCadmium = 813 mg/KgLead = 500 mg/Kg
TCLP criteria are as follows:Arsenic = 5.0 mg/LCadmium = 1.0 mg/LLead = 5.0 mg/L
If any consituent exceeded the RAO and/or TCLP, thenthe location was highlighted as an exceedence.
mg/Kg = milligrams per kilogrammg/L = milligrams per literRAO = Remedial Action ObjectiveTCLP = Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
NOTE:
007668
APPENDIX A
Field Logbook
007669
S·t5·•o. ''l'l~<o 1). t:llF1HA.~T
o~• Sl' E 11> G£t: ~ope
RePI.AU:: ~oo>~!tf 1'\TTAC.IIi:l> 10 "iH<; j)At>l , (..oc,.c,o;J>. ~
1"\ ..v. ~ w I l'bl'( fl.OP€. Ro>PE LG./1/<> 711 n. ""' . .,.,.~&~"".:; L.€N<.l" /\~ wtl!t·
D.t"~IIAA' oi"Fsrno.
1RIU:VG I'. T 1-(c. oo:-Ft<€".
l TU~~~MY j1AY "?.! :«.ta,
TAs>< c f:l€#C.H Sc.Al."E" s Flo< I)Y 5A"' P<.t C.oU.'"<.I'to»·
c .. H2..ctTtfE'A ~---- __ C::.LouP~ ~ ;A1~D 7D:\___ AI.N'W e.J.;:,..,__ t;) ,s-. _':_~ ___ ,.,_P b __
1 P€1\"<lrv"El '. D,-~NI'l:-L !CAR AAF1T
T
07<3.;}
jO'I~
(I••
JJ;2C
LOAVt
Pt<.w:.
Ail. Ill: liE"
!.AMPL8
i!.EGJ:.V
ICC. o_.C~&"c.ti
v.P Supf'l..l"t::].
<>N li'"IF. i'R(ifAfl€ 71> COllet r LO" I'O.SI:of"l!o'
~It 5€Dl"~AI'r A..Vb so __ ~-~.
C.ott,:C:r~,.t<. ~oo:Mo;JVT <..o"' Po• 7:.To ~
. fi:>M a- o.s' &.~ AT -"I~R- o~l -•·'"'"?. oS", ..... f\!11! :lif!'i, M~R·oS, COllEcT ::/ • 01 G.AllV' 8"U<~~.
liSS. (.ONPI.~ sE'o:t,..0:NY ~Po.snt 5AI'\P(~/III..
AND A!ltA otJ W~St~ Ntnr~ ol" Ttt€ ~F"fG. co<t,ttt"t>
_ Fli'lb C:.I!A~ .. w,o.~n; J"l!~"" AR€/'1 A~ ">O>"U. ;;J • ~ G~''"" ei!.<~<&T.S.
~~~· (.oMPl"'f ~o_r<- 6>1"\P'"l11:" _5A,.PLE,
l~<;o 1>. ~1\RIIAA"t" . oO:I' •J:i)£,
17•• ... 1;>. E~ltl,..._t 1!,}\C.k AL t<<. oFPI:c.e ·
I
007670
{,'1'1%
_ .{.Vti>.Uf~~y 1 S~;l'fcMB.... !9, .0!7 ,
"TA~ k: 'FlOob J1l.f"A~A~L%H tfST
utAT~t\ ·. P·~~A.e. _. -~:t-1) eu·"'--- -~ -s , _ ;>c~ ...,.,., • .._ ', _ DA.VIt?' L £'1\P. HA ;lT
_ O'loo 1:1.;'1\UE k<. 01~1':tU
___ A:~~~~-- 6W.H'Tt:' , R~t ,ALRSAb7' o,JSI'TI:." · R"lo.F"F 13€1'"""'"
iet.t.l:\ '\l.,JJ-b tELtvGP-€0 ~ "!_~!~ :s_:c __ ~_·
~dt(:c.:~ oJl:e~T.I\Tto.J ____ A.v_o -~-F-~Y T84_r..vrN(,_.
__ lp(.~ ___ (;YC4'f_~~~fl( ~~W\1 A~~_ "'t);:~_C:-I.ASJ 1'/fl!,ql"l"'\l!',.vr
_ ~!,.Alii_•__ ~0~~- ,a,eAJPII'\""e'NT Wl:\..L e.t.,~~lt. l=X«5'r.
_ 511~! \))ON .. «~ -Je. ])rSC-•S~ 1"C.€Ar>"\E:Aif A_Rf:n
____ ,tWC) ___ APPi01~:._!!· ~--~1\1 ~"\;:\>eo _"fH.t\r ~r!-._ '-'t'"''
_ _& (<JC.IB:I'eb FtD ""- _ .,.~.- A ~teA "" -rR. s,. <R. ~
8cri!>X'1(l" ?'H(i__ l>~<..~t 'l't,l~ \.IIO.li<S'S. ~4/1 <,AC>I'It""-
ANI> ~Ill> • A""' t•~""':f-"S A Re.-(lt 5~,vTAT zve- MI«Wi£
•r _ J<E'OrA. s~ I'RE5£.vr o.v S~'l€'. _S<>rl usa>_ ""'' T•c nel\'l',.,f?.oll' ..,:t•L BE' ~"'l<(AVAfEI> F~l't Q•_f•-' 1'1"
~..,s.
<ygJI Ji<Colo"'"'- ~ T Ti ·1> ,
___ -""i-____ II lDoJ!>
LooP.~ C)"'\QN_'::I '11(:. ~~1.. ~ 9..01.'-"'~ A'F~~ 1'\.~C.'tvt.
M'Jf'li1l. -~t>'- ~" '>" ,z~Q\,....,.. • .,.,
!il,:).:> l.,~~-'"1
<>"" ~\,r"' ''""'"'' 3 H• L;S\ oF e-N•:i:<o«L<.vt> A r 1i~
~r 11~> ~o~F~s~·r~'--------------~ ~"' ~<.t Gzt.- $M'~Gl§,v/;) (.~ II% L'F~i\ T't.tl~ A•,(-',PL
f_310 C:ot\Pi't 'lP.t?AltO s.n::c- e,~<.k Jb e.-cAVJlT.Ji:tN,
,11\ 'blre.:tal aou.NO __ ~ Wo\T~ --~~L !'W1S'--~-~ flo.e~rs ..
1'\:MC:
_t!>A\_
-.-.1~1.
---~
I'll.>·'& __ 11-~-,
-·""'·S' _ )IS'I>
l'lil j _fW'•IO <B.o~
_llH _ 1'\w·'l~ 1'1.17
13'\~
. -~~~,
l)~~
l?)~f
~~~{~--
\'161
f'llo). ~
f'lu. <I
""-"1-l
r-1!'· \
"'"'·I.
,o.lo
q ....
11:9'11
9-'3L IJ./g
__ 13.~.> Q.tS
-~-
-_ _lll·o'l.
~~.·~
1'-l:of_
"" -f't:'f" f't'- ...
\3 __ ·~-~--
t~.o~
/~ .... : 1':1.~)
1~.~·
{/.<.)
-r:. t~_o_~
-- -~ "'"~€- )_%_ €W'vr~--~ ~'"~~--- _HAR~&g.)!.f ____ _ _..,tll\~0 _
__ ----~- 'SQJ~~~, N~ _______ SAMPl.fF --~~~_l(:"'t'tEO· ~~~~0 SOT<-
----- ~~_]"%,, '"-" --- ~ ,1'\Nt:'-~---lc...~ __ p_ ~
'"T'q.~~'"'EN1" _.
~o __ l! ____ ser.z~G~r __ _
J'-\}Q_ j'=J;"f__ I,'T...,_LIU _ OF ___ ~~~"l;,lA£.1 "'./"''•""' lR~ ol'_ J,..:<. ___ _
007671
q-11·1> ~44,(.. b.fARI-lf\•1
O>U.ol<.T (s..rc. • FlEE:f'<.<IA> f'\(,0 S'%} R>R 'fU.q> As,l./.1/'1.·
OET ._.. . A1 ,....,. ~;. ..,L • U.SI EfNL 1)1.1' Ar 1\fll~ov l.o <.A""" ,.;.., &"T oJR N /Aw·••· "''' f;J.Dl. llA>'tliY AI" Art¥•r 1-~<AU•<t
16~) ~1 . ~,~0 Li.' 00: I"~~ i'\OlJ <.>/ 3'1""0 ~> of' SI>J'.<..
!='Of.. __ A_ ~RR~f=I..O~ R.Ati", __ oF_ '9~/tt,
~icT~otO.-Ff/.fi!J:<a.J /l~o 6'07.1 FoR iC<P As.O,f'(,.
R.:rwlct ~0 S41'<. .,., £'laAVDll'•~·
J~Js ,..,. ~f .6'<_/''" · L we Jl.l$ 'KA2C.. _txt ;p· ,_,.-<or. ~s Co<i<LoN<
1 ''S bET "'' liT """' · 7· ....._-. {~./ Q • hAJ(. piiY Ai' AM!o)r O· 'S' f..I"'.L'"'· il.~'i ~lAP 1\'T "'""'"· "''' 9./B. 31'17~ l)l!lAT M'f'~o)< ;;M <>I«~·
JJ~~q i""~ l:!>!,o !.6\ oF TOlRI'I6oA>O ""(!~coo L<!s •• :;:~TL l"o<'t A ~e;t4!A 11..,0 RA. '1'.1:-o
C.oLUoCI' I ;:5ort • T.;-R'!A e,,vil
oF ?tt/e.
J.A --~~l_---:~~~-~------~e --~s.Gt.P4.
~E\ -\19 1>,} fl'IU··· """· q.,~ \ii>~L-~ ALAI'Pfo> ~·;!' ""'-·
5E1 l,<P AT ..,...,,3,_\,IL' . \\·•1 6/lr'- QO' AT_}Ii'l'l!o) __ ~.o <.A<.
JIXY. d-ill) ~s_ ---~-'"-- ----~~a~\loJJD to:~/ :5,t.J"rW ~-~~-- C?_f_ --~ ______ F~~-
A 'TimAA s ... " tAt"J:D~~ o~ 0'io.
c.ou.~~ r;~,, -·~(~~...,. <A ~'ll' 1 f<L 'll:ll' ~- u.,,..
CoLltLT :su.~~~~--- t.....f\l't'f.. ~eAJ.~E"~i\.
s~~:t ~ I"'._,L_f~i_c_ o:~"
' '· ~· .
9 • II· 12
WI~ Po~<> ~ cDR' - --- -----------
IS ~o f•'-"' 'I c "J))tY
!& '" PDND \ ' l>l'l'
007672
(, ~·191..
THIA!WY-1 Y >.ll:l''r<:n&,~ -<&, :>ot)
IA&I<: f="IEtD "UfllT,M:t't:>>l" Tii'sT
p,;:R'»w«c · \>ArJ'l:'t~ tAIII<AI>T
D-€'AA.MIU•· Ofht.'tt'. ~\Z: e..A~Sf7l: .... _ -~f' __ ~e:-__ r>:: _ .('_~_¢'_~-'=!~. ~0.....v-: TRt:ll'rtr.> ~Cit<.... FRo"' ~ol,t..,.q: A,.. _fl;\GE," "'.v
eJI..cAV/J,TI'oJJ, (,~AQt '\1tt4101) "'"(,WV """"'""'T~, ,RJ;~~
e,(!Ac,<i' "'"~"' ........
i?'.Cc.AV4~ OF- S~,.,_..:;vt.
__ St;r uJ' 1\"tP..t...J-S, bd_:. 12.V8 K4,cc.. t>_Rl' ~,.. 9-'0l~GA'-t.c.us.
"'"'' .,_, _S~ "0 A1' A"'·~. W~' II·~S J3All p«Y Ar- o.S <,AU."'·
_51.!1 u.t-" A't ,...w- S. ~L. ... 11.15" "S-A:{;L 'DP.'t A1 dl .t C'oAlLri.N'S.
. S.."'t ~~ ~1" f\IJ. \. !vL , I~<!)~ 1!/l.~l. '1:1\Y AJ·o. \ G,f'I.L>"'
___ ~> ,;!3 go ~B'> "" re~P.\ )!>.>•1> "'/ 1"1,.,.. <6• •• ~<2'PL ... ,.,..-
>o.9. I< T~P~ f,o,tD IIA'U• •• 1'1~.
c..w.c:c..T GeDr"""'T·'TeflRI\i!<>AID 1-A ?•J Fott
o_'O~~ _-;IT u.~ All"'-":;_ ---~-~--~- 11:6 15<\'l( PR1 -. . .:> ~1---------~-lt~~~
·~'13> 5<"T u.f ~T' }'.Y·>. \.,JL~ r;.o~ ~\.. \llt "1.1./ Cl\<-'."'-' ':>tl i!.P JIT ,...., . ']. "'L' \~-11. ~t.l oAr A.~ ti-L~.>I\~.
q. 3D(I' ,;w9<. 'j). €i>I<IIAIU
o91S" ~ :J.720 <..<SS oF T<:"l!P~ l'>o~ ..,I 8fo<P <.6S oF :>o'i'<. r-ot<
A Tt"llOA i3o.110 RATr'"" O¥" B".4,
••"-t<T \SE"DV"'>.vr -Ttl!liA&/JO ~A B% l>oR ,<cl' A~4l,l'b fMPH 7lW!~ S~br'"'E:""' Flto"' i>O<L><<".
e 9'15' JI:ICJI ~7~· LBf oF (;Aiurtu !Jl.r;~ w r ~'IO<J" Lilt
OF ~ceo.;;.. Qt. 'I" ,:;..< ,1.1-1 .flvv.r~o (JLi!'A/.P II'At:no
,o~~ (§.J.Iicr r5C:(H'MM- §1\jv>::i!OBI.e.<IO cs: II o/., I ..-~ ... 1'<-LP ..... U..Ph- E,._,P?Y ~'E'ATE'Il ser..z-r<e>Vr ~".,;, e<>~\.oF"F;
n 10 I'>E<)M tAEi<JAJc,._ _ a =• ~r;, • ..- E"M<rR•&..<:"" c, 1 3e,;u• ~ ar
<=.F SGI)XM~-~ • .IT l='ot ArV E»W'tlo6U:~P R.A:nv ~F 7-=k.
\\'~0 (.~~'-~-"~---nG<f.or~b/r-E'JJv:tPu&6vt\ c..s 7 ;J f"Ott \C..\.1?
A-,. CJ.l'· Eri\l "IAEA"\€0 ~eor"~""l F~•-" ('lo<U>FP.
Fltt:"C FL;o,!.J 'RATre or:: .:) 0/.:,, I~ ':xJ Fol __ A_
(;;or,..~;.~ F'~H: FLa.> No S % 1 >oo
A,, c_,, Pt. "'"'"'1 ~effl"ep '""'""'•"" f"'" ~ou."' • . \'\'XI '""~ )( :;l._:_'l:?-_? ______ ~~- - ---~-!- __ f_~-~ _A.~ - \..)I 1,'-\ p~ L13!. 0~
s~~l~~N7r-~~~_$~~~~~~~~~
,.u.P ___ Ali.. (c.l._,_ft;,_. __
E.nri7 TR€ATeO ~E"Ol'netvT _F~_o_~ __ f5_;)~-~f~-~ _A--~--
lo,t.~'\€0 :SE'Dl:~liT ~;._,_s_ __ ~~_CQ"r_ct~---- A(-Y:-~$1___ __ ~"'-~:-~:~~L~~----
'"'"-<A<E :ttV ~~fA~ IleA~ 1''1" -oB AI"'> !"M'.-o<-\.
ec~u..vA'i'l;oM. VJ !"lt> ,:tTl: RA'If:.V€ "'"<.1!.1< <o,.., ... nE..P S<i
:pil{'J/(Ar.O "'""-'"' '••UM>E "" •t..,o A~_l'T "l>:<<> ~ho<'
007673
~oP 01'1' ;! CooLG:R> lit: f'E? E'< ill~ ilb""L~v~R:I' 11.>
AL'>-
'1>. E'A~~/IIl.'t __ oN'-"-"rG'· 'll~l: .. C,.."r:t""'t'c.. ,._, L.>M Ar'P __
y~ <"- - . <>:61'-'t.~~ ...
!>E't _ ... I ___ l<.t /'.W-'1>. LJ(., J)R_V_
DA:l' A l o, a, (:,A.Uo r<1 S , __
~i ~L. ill __ f'i.<J. 10 . ""- • t),l-5 _ _ D~f A r o. '' .,..,..,.~
~El oP AT "'"'·LI. 1.\L' !\.0~ ____ 13'11''-D~Y A~ 1.•.- GA"'"""----
5<n ... t ~· ~· v-• ~.,.
!"""- ). I.J\...': \\.'!,lo
~-~--:_? _____ . -~~ ~ 1'1-15'
5At\.. D~l' A' 0 ,,f ~lWJo')_~-
o«,Y AT -:l. OS <:oiY-'-""' .J 64t\.
I>UL
~n u.f A-t- ~~---=-! __ t,.J\.." n .. tt. ~': ___ t)Ar __ AT t9.\ l.o'\l..t..•-"'~
~ ~>t p.T I'W- \ ""-' I~.:>"- &AI<- PIIY At "-'" (,f\l.<o!S
'oeT" "-P ;o.."t" __ /"....,_-!. ~·- ~-~e ~\._Dlt'(A7 l.o <>AIVN~
~ ~ ~H_5Z"!f: .
1>-li.A~ M~ 1 o>"< SJ: ~ .
,~c~ovOfl~ a::tt>Befl 151 :1<!>1~
'fA> K · G.ltou.•~ IJ1<_1l:1t ~""·•
t-J2A~H<1'-'· C.L~_AR,_ UP,Ob'Q. 7u \
!)~Gil-~'"""'-'· Dl\rJ~ e-AP-1'11/Z.r
ocro • L>?"v" "><L_ .cef't:<t'
lO'If ,4#-PIIC O_tJ_~_f!'g'L _(!}pG_q LDt.K.. p.te~ ___ p'!_ _____ (D"TE. fJtrtJ ~~---~RD."l'
rs _ UNI<.V<IIoJrJ _:1) _ o.,Titf" IOATt". <AJ.J_.;'f:>_ .SA All- f>ol.JrJ~f? __ ~
_:.Hf:: __ L.J.&.S WJ~Af!£ ___ cF Arv'Y <--~~-----~-£:'!~.41C..EJ: :j:"T ~~~----~f¢DE"4)
'{O ~'\__ ~.
1.so OO'f~%'1£. "" wet" _j?>o_'-'t '"-Tt"<::-~!.
i\OS o~~<o"'!10, ?<J.T Oll'i" l.o<-\<-. __ Btb.W fZai' .. IJ_ oF VATI:-~ ~M1S,
{(:lJ..
__ w~LL
f'W{
{VI.!,J.,
~--··
~ .. :n
"-~' l/.11
9. ~~
ll· 'I'(
i'H~
e stt
TD -'"·at
'"·"-•
IS.S"~
I 'I,,)' __
11. :n
L~·•1 -
007674
APPENDIX B
Analytical Laboratory Reports for Bench Testing
007675
ALS Preliminary and Initial Bench Testing
007676
29-Jun-2012
Remediation Services, IncGrant Sherwwood
Dear Grant,
Re: Tulsa Fuels Work Order: 12051071
Fax: (620) 331-6216Tel: (620) 331-1200
2735 South 10th StreetIndependence, KS 67301
ALS Environmental received 25 samples on 23-May-2012 through 06-Jun-2012 for the analyses presented in the following report.
Project ManagerBethany AgarwalElectronically approved by: Kelsey N. Brown
Certificate No: KS: E-10352
The analytical data provided relates directly to the samples received by ALS Environmental and for only the analyses requested. Results are expressed as "as received" unless otherwise noted. QC sample results for this data met EPA or laboratory specifications except as noted in the Case Narrative or as noted with qualifiers in the QC batch information. Should this laboratory report need to be reproduced, it should be reproduced in full unless written approval has been obtained by ALS Environmental. Samples will be disposed in 30 days unless storage arrangements are made.
The total number of pages in this report is 16.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
ADDRESS 10450 Stancliff Rd, Suite 210 Houston, Texas 77099-4338 | PHONE (281) 530-5656 | FAX (281) 530-5887ALS GROUP USA, CORP Part of the ALS Laboratory Group A Cam pbell Brothers Lim ited Com pany
007677
Date: 29-Jun-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc
Work Order: 12051071Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date ReceivedMatrix Hold12051071-01 Terra Bond SC Soil 5/22/2012 5/23/2012 08:4512051071-02 Enviro Blend 90/10 Coarse Dust 5/22/2012 5/31/2012 10:0012051071-03 Enviro Blend CS Dust 6/6/2012 6/6/2012 10:0012051071-04 Enviro Phos Coarse Dust 6/6/2012 6/6/2012 10:0012051071-05 Enviro Blend 90110 Coarse Dust 6/6/2012 6/6/2012 10:0012051071-06 TFM-Soil Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-07 TFM-Sediment Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-08 Soil/EB/1% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-09 Soil/EB/2% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-10 Soil/EB/3% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-11 Soil/TSP/1% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-12 Soil/TSP/2% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-13 Soil/TSP/3% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-14 Soil/TB/2% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-15 Soil/TB/3% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-16 Soil/TB/4% Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-17 Sed/EB/1% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-18 Sed/EB/2% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-19 Sed/EB/3% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-20 Sed/TSP/1% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-21 Sed/TSP/2% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-22 Sed/TSP/3% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-23 Sed/TB/2% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-24 Sed/TB/3% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:1512051071-25 Sed/TB/4% Sediment 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:15
SS Page 1 of 1
007678
Date: 03-Jul-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc
Work Order: 12051071Case Narrative
No Exceptions
CN Page 1 of 1
007679
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 12051071
ALS Environmental Date: 29-Jun-12
Client Sample ID: TFM-SoilLab ID: 12051071-06A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/14/2012Arsenic 6/15/2012 03:03 AM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/15/2012 04:34 PM0.200 mg/L 1009.25Lead 6/15/2012 04:34 PM0.500 mg/L 10026.8
Client Sample ID: TFM-SedimentLab ID: 12051071-07A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/14/2012Arsenic 6/15/2012 03:12 AM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/15/2012 03:12 AM0.0200 mg/L 103.27Lead 6/15/2012 03:12 AM0.0500 mg/L 102.65
Client Sample ID: Soil/EB/1%Lab ID: 12051071-08A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 06:44 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 06:44 PM0.0200 mg/L 106.79Lead 6/28/2012 06:44 PM0.0500 mg/L 1013.8
Client Sample ID: Soil/EB/2%Lab ID: 12051071-09A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 06:46 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 06:46 PM0.0200 mg/L 104.73Lead 6/28/2012 06:46 PM0.0500 mg/L 104.69
AR Page 1 of 5
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
007680
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 12051071
ALS Environmental Date: 29-Jun-12
Client Sample ID: Soil/EB/3%Lab ID: 12051071-10A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/29/2012 03:13 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/29/2012 03:13 PM0.0200 mg/L 103.50Lead 6/29/2012 03:13 PM0.0500 mg/L 101.77
Client Sample ID: Soil/TSP/1%Lab ID: 12051071-11A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:09 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.110Cadmium 6/28/2012 07:09 PM0.0200 mg/L 106.55Lead 6/28/2012 07:09 PM0.0500 mg/L 105.98
Client Sample ID: Soil/TSP/2%Lab ID: 12051071-12A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:12 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.193Cadmium 6/28/2012 07:12 PM0.0200 mg/L 105.80Lead 6/28/2012 07:12 PM0.0500 mg/L 103.05
Client Sample ID: Soil/TSP/3%Lab ID: 12051071-13A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:15 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.217Cadmium 6/28/2012 07:15 PM0.0200 mg/L 104.74Lead 6/28/2012 07:15 PM0.0500 mg/L 101.73
AR Page 2 of 5
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
007681
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 12051071
ALS Environmental Date: 29-Jun-12
Client Sample ID: Soil/TB/2%Lab ID: 12051071-14A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:17 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:17 PM0.0200 mg/L 107.61Lead 6/28/2012 07:17 PM0.0500 mg/L 1017.4
Client Sample ID: Soil/TB/3%Lab ID: 12051071-15A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:20 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:20 PM0.0200 mg/L 109.50Lead 6/29/2012 11:45 AM0.500 mg/L 10014.6
Client Sample ID: Soil/TB/4%Lab ID: 12051071-16A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:22 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:22 PM0.0200 mg/L 1010.7Lead 6/29/2012 11:47 AM0.500 mg/L 10015.6
Client Sample ID: Sed/EB/1%Lab ID: 12051071-17A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:25 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:25 PM0.0200 mg/L 102.69Lead 6/28/2012 07:25 PM0.0500 mg/L 101.03
AR Page 3 of 5
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
007682
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 12051071
ALS Environmental Date: 29-Jun-12
Client Sample ID: Sed/EB/2%Lab ID: 12051071-18A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:33 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:33 PM0.0200 mg/L 102.56Lead 6/28/2012 07:33 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.529
Client Sample ID: Sed/EB/3%Lab ID: 12051071-19A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:35 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:35 PM0.0200 mg/L 101.51Lead 6/28/2012 07:35 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.0993
Client Sample ID: Sed/TSP/1%Lab ID: 12051071-20A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:38 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.141Cadmium 6/28/2012 07:38 PM0.0200 mg/L 103.82Lead 6/28/2012 07:38 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.803
Client Sample ID: Sed/TSP/2%Lab ID: 12051071-21A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:41 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.139Cadmium 6/28/2012 07:41 PM0.0200 mg/L 102.20Lead 6/28/2012 07:41 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.266
AR Page 4 of 5
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
007683
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 12051071
ALS Environmental Date: 29-Jun-12
Client Sample ID: Sed/TSP/3%Lab ID: 12051071-22A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:43 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.194Cadmium 6/28/2012 07:43 PM0.0200 mg/L 102.56Lead 6/28/2012 07:43 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.208
Client Sample ID: Sed/TB/2%Lab ID: 12051071-23A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:46 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:46 PM0.0200 mg/L 104.09Lead 6/28/2012 07:46 PM0.0500 mg/L 103.89
Client Sample ID: Sed/TB/3%Lab ID: 12051071-24A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:48 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:48 PM0.0200 mg/L 105.33Lead 6/28/2012 07:48 PM0.0500 mg/L 103.94
Client Sample ID: Sed/TB/4%Lab ID: 12051071-25A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SEDIMENT
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 6/28/2012Arsenic 6/28/2012 07:51 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 6/28/2012 07:51 PM0.0200 mg/L 105.03Lead 6/28/2012 07:51 PM0.0500 mg/L 103.49
AR Page 5 of 5
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
007684
Date: 29-Jun-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa Fuels
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 12051071
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 61876 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/15/2012 02:16 AM
Prep Date: 6/14/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2821096
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120614A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKT1-061312-61876
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020NDLead 0.050ND
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/15/2012 02:19 AM
Prep Date: 6/14/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2821097
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120614A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKW4-061412-61876
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020NDLead 0.050ND
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/15/2012 02:22 AM
Prep Date: 6/14/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2821098
LCS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120614A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MLCSW4-061412-61876
000.5Arsenic 109 80-1200.0500.5457000.5Cadmium 107 80-1200.0200.5337000.5Lead 111 80-1200.0500.556
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/15/2012 02:29 AM
Prep Date: 6/14/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2821101
MS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120614A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1206365-02BMS
0-0.0002180.5Arsenic 101 75-1250.0500.505700.0016530.5Cadmium 99 75-1250.0200.496800.017520.5Lead 99.8 75-1250.0500.5163
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/15/2012 02:32 AM
Prep Date: 6/14/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2821102
MSD
Run ID: ICPMS05_120614A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1206365-02BMSD
0.5057-0.0002180.5Arsenic 107 75-125 250.050 5.870.53630.49680.0016530.5Cadmium 103 75-125 250.020 4.120.51770.51630.017520.5Lead 105 75-125 250.050 5.270.5442
QC Page: 1 of 4Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
007685
Project: Tulsa Fuels
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 12051071
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 61876 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/15/2012 02:27 AM
Prep Date: 6/14/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2821100
DUP
Run ID: ICPMS05_120614A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1206365-02BDUP
-0.00021800Arsenic 0 0-0 250.050 0ND0.00165300Cadmium 0 0-0 250.020 0ND
J0.0175200Lead 0 0-0 250.050 00.0161
The following samples were analyzed in this batch: 12051071-06A 12051071-07A
QC Page: 2 of 4Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
007686
Project: Tulsa Fuels
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 12051071
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 62207 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/28/2012 06:36 PM
Prep Date: 6/28/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2839394
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120628A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKT1-062712-62207
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020NDLead 0.050ND
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/28/2012 06:39 PM
Prep Date: 6/28/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2839395
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120628A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKW1-062812-62207
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020NDLead 0.050ND
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/28/2012 06:41 PM
Prep Date: 6/28/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2839396
LCS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120628A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MLCSW1-062812-62207
000.5Arsenic 101 80-1200.0500.5026000.5Cadmium 102 80-1200.0200.511000.5Lead 102 80-1200.0500.5076
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/29/2012 03:18 PM
Prep Date: 6/28/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: Soil/EB/3% SeqNo: 2840617
MS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120629A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 12051071-10AMS
00.012390.5Arsenic 104 75-1250.0500.5317O03.4990.5Cadmium 121 75-1250.0204.106
01.7740.5Lead 114 75-1250.0502.345
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/29/2012 03:21 PM
Prep Date: 6/28/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: Soil/EB/3% SeqNo: 2840619
MSD
Run ID: ICPMS05_120629A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 12051071-10AMSD
00.012390.5Arsenic 102 75-1250.0500.5234O03.4990.5Cadmium 118 75-1250.0204.091
01.7740.5Lead 117 75-1250.0502.359
QC Page: 3 of 4Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
007687
Project: Tulsa Fuels
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 12051071
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 62207 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 6/29/2012 03:16 PM
Prep Date: 6/28/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: Soil/EB/3% SeqNo: 2840614
DUP
Run ID: ICPMS05_120629A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 12051071-10ADUP
0.0123900Arsenic 0 0-0 250.050 0ND3.49900Cadmium 0 0-0 250.020 1.283.4541.77400Lead 0 0-0 250.050 0.4691.782
The following samples were analyzed in this batch: 12051071-08A 12051071-09A 12051071-10A12051071-11A 12051071-12A 12051071-13A12051071-14A 12051071-15A 12051071-16A12051071-17A 12051071-18A 12051071-19A12051071-20A 12051071-21A 12051071-22A12051071-23A 12051071-24A 12051071-25A
QC Page: 4 of 4Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
007688
ALS Environmental Date: 29-Jun-12
QUALIFIERS, ACRONYMS, UNITS
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc
WorkOrder: 12051071
Units Reported Description
Qualifier Description
Acronym Description
Milligrams per Litermg/L
Value exceeds Regulatory Limit*Not accreditedaAnalyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting LimitBValue above quantitation rangeEAnalyzed outside of Holding TimeHAnalyte detected below quantitation limitJManually integrated, see raw data for justificationMNot offered for accreditationnNot Detected at the Reporting LimitNDSample amount is > 4 times amount spikedODual Column results percent difference > 40%PRPD above laboratory control limitRSpike Recovery outside laboratory control limitsSAnalyzed but not detected above the MDLU
Detectability Check StudyDCS
Method DuplicateDUP
Laboratory Control SampleLCS
Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateLCSD
Method BlankMBLK
Method Detection LimitMDL
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Matrix SpikeMS
Matrix Spike DuplicateMSD
Post Digestion SpikePDS
Practical Quantitation LimitPQL
Serial DilutionSD
Sample Detection LimitSDL
Texas Risk Reduction ProgramTRRP
QF Page 1 of 1
007689
• Request for Chemical Analysis and Chain of Custody Re REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.-KS: Remediation SeTVices, Inc
12051071 Project: Tulsa Fuels Bench
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Laboratory: 1-\L S Dol
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 --
9400 Ward Parkway
JO'jf:O :':>h"xJ;fF Roc,,\ Lat
Kansas City, Missouri 64114 Address:
"-·:._;. Phone: (816) 333-9400 Fax: (816) 822-3494 City/State/Zip: \-\cc<dM (X 770 ')19'
Attention: ShMo,, SheJ~o., Telephone: J.'l;l- ,SO:,O- 5G,S(,
Project Number: £2"11~-
Client Name: t;;_ l s" Fcv h Sample Number Sample Event sa0~1fe~t)pth cso~~~~~d
s;~o~~~~e s~~~;· o;!;~~~or l ~ c1l , 1 ~ Remarks
IT\',N\- 'S0:Z:: L () 0 s- IS-">i-1'1 - IX I [X ICo"'Pos•ie IT\"1"1- S£01 fN1(J'I\ 0 I) 5 I,;:-~·-', IX li l>< IC..o'"P'"'h
~ ~
1:-::::::: !----1------
~ v ~--~ 1---
V/§ -~ ___ v
//:--V£ r/----1/:::Jc v
-----~- ~- ?
,...,../",/
/~/-
----~ _./~-~--
~~-
~- h(///r:Z',,;,_( &r"'rr I V~"'P'0' '0'"' J Special Instructions:
/}
1ZZ?Z:Z 6 l~;~~;,~J Received ~•J• -Zcf2~~~:~ I ~:s l:~~nt in Co~~'n['J I Temperature Upon Receipt:
;_eHnquish8ci By I Date/Time I By Date/Time "Y
007690
ilf "if
" !I
~ ~
il ~ ~·
-
~I f
-
i -
I - -
El l': ~I fi 6E££
£9P0
08l
XJP
'J'OO
OBI
woo
·xap
aj
007691
ALS Environmental
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client Name: REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.-
Work Order: 12051071
Date/Time Received: 06-Jun-12 09:15
Received by: RDH
Checklist completed byeSignature Date
Reviewed by:DateeSignature
Matrices: soilCarrier name: FedEx
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present
Chain of custody present? Yes No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No
Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No
Sample containers intact? Yes No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No
All samples received within holding time? Yes No
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? Yes No
Yes No No VOA vials submittedWater - VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No N/A
Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s): Ambient
Login Notes:
N/A
Cooler(s)/Kit(s):
24-May-12 08-Jun-12 Robert D. Harris Bethany Agarwal
pH adjusted? Yes No N/ApH adjusted by:
Date/Time sample(s) sent to storage:
CorrectiveAction:
Comments:
Client Contacted: Date Contacted: Person Contacted:
Contacted By: Regarding:
SRC Page 1 of 1007692
ALS Supplemental Bench Testing
007693
19-Jul-2012
Remediation Services, IncGrant Sherwwood
Dear Grant,
Re: Tulsa Fuels Work Order: 1207646
Fax: (620) 331-6216Tel: (620) 331-1200
2735 South 10th StreetIndependence, KS 67301
ALS Environmental received 2 samples on 06-Jun-2012 09:15 AM for the analyses presented in the following report.
Project ManagerBethany AgarwalElectronically approved by: Kelsey N. Brown
Certificate No: KS: E-10352
The analytical data provided relates directly to the samples received by ALS Environmental and for only the analyses requested. Results are expressed as "as received" unless otherwise noted. QC sample results for this data met EPA or laboratory specifications except as noted in the Case Narrative or as noted with qualifiers in the QC batch information. Should this laboratory report need to be reproduced, it should be reproduced in full unless written approval has been obtained by ALS Environmental. Samples will be disposed in 30 days unless storage arrangements are made.
The total number of pages in this report is 10.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
ADDRESS 10450 Stancliff Rd, Suite 210 Houston, Texas 77099-4338 | PHONE (281) 530-5656 | FAX (281) 530-5887ALS GROUP USA, CORP Part of the ALS Laboratory Group A Cam pbell Brothers Lim ited Com pany
007694
Date: 19-Jul-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc
Work Order: 1207646Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date ReceivedMatrix Hold1207646-01 Soil/TSP/8% 12051071-06
TSP/8%Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:15
1207646-02 Soil/TSP/10% 12051071-06 TSP/10%
Soil 5/31/2012 6/6/2012 09:15
SS Page 1 of 1
007695
Date: 19-Jul-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc
Work Order: 1207646Case Narrative
No Exceptions
CN Page 1 of 1
007696
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 1207646
ALS Environmental Date: 19-Jul-12
Client Sample ID: Soil/TSP/8%Lab ID: 1207646-01A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 7/17/2012Arsenic 7/17/2012 05:27 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.254Cadmium 7/17/2012 05:27 PM0.0200 mg/L 101.65Lead 7/17/2012 05:27 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.354
Client Sample ID: Soil/TSP/10%Lab ID: 1207646-02A Collection Date: 5/31/2012
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 7/17/2012Arsenic 7/17/2012 05:29 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.323Cadmium 7/17/2012 05:29 PM0.0200 mg/L 101.35Lead 7/17/2012 05:29 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.249
AR Page 1 of 1
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
007697
Date: 19-Jul-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa Fuels
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 1207646
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 62689 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 7/17/2012 04:45 PM
Prep Date: 7/17/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2862643
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120717A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKT1-071612-62689
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020NDLead 0.050ND
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 7/17/2012 04:48 PM
Prep Date: 7/17/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2862644
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120717A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKW2-071712-62689
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020NDLead 0.050ND
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 7/17/2012 04:50 PM
Prep Date: 7/17/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2862645
LCS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120717A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MLCSW2-071712-62689
000.5Arsenic 102 80-1200.0500.5103000.5Cadmium 105 80-1200.0200.5234000.5Lead 103 80-1200.0500.5164
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 7/17/2012 05:06 PM
Prep Date: 7/17/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2862651
MS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120717A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1207566-11CMS
0-0.0016930.5Arsenic 101 75-1250.0500.505600.002580.5Cadmium 102 75-1250.0200.511100.0039060.5Lead 99.7 75-1250.0500.5023
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 7/17/2012 05:08 PM
Prep Date: 7/17/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2862652
MSD
Run ID: ICPMS05_120717A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1207566-11CMSD
0.5056-0.0016930.5Arsenic 101 75-125 250.050 0.1520.50480.51110.002580.5Cadmium 104 75-125 250.020 1.980.52130.50230.0039060.5Lead 101 75-125 250.050 1.350.5092
QC Page: 1 of 2Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
007698
Project: Tulsa Fuels
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 1207646
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 62689 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 7/17/2012 04:58 PM
Prep Date: 7/17/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2862648
DUP
Run ID: ICPMS05_120717A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1207566-11CDUP
-0.00169300Arsenic 0 0-0 250.050 0ND0.0025800Cadmium 0 0-0 250.020 0ND
0.00390600Lead 0 0-0 250.050 0ND
The following samples were analyzed in this batch: 1207646-01A 1207646-02A
QC Page: 2 of 2Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
007699
ALS Environmental Date: 19-Jul-12
QUALIFIERS, ACRONYMS, UNITS
Project: Tulsa FuelsClient: Remediation Services, Inc
WorkOrder: 1207646
Units Reported Description
Qualifier Description
Acronym Description
Milligrams per Litermg/L
Value exceeds Regulatory Limit*Not accreditedaAnalyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting LimitBValue above quantitation rangeEAnalyzed outside of Holding TimeHAnalyte detected below quantitation limitJManually integrated, see raw data for justificationMNot offered for accreditationnNot Detected at the Reporting LimitNDSample amount is > 4 times amount spikedODual Column results percent difference > 40%PRPD above laboratory control limitRSpike Recovery outside laboratory control limitsSAnalyzed but not detected above the MDLU
Detectability Check StudyDCS
Method DuplicateDUP
Laboratory Control SampleLCS
Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateLCSD
Method BlankMBLK
Method Detection LimitMDL
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Matrix SpikeMS
Matrix Spike DuplicateMSD
Post Digestion SpikePDS
Practical Quantitation LimitPQL
Serial DilutionSD
Sample Detection LimitSDL
Texas Risk Reduction ProgramTRRP
QF Page 1 of 1
007700
ALS Environmental
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client Name: REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.-
Work Order: 12051071
Date/Time Received: 06-Jun-12 09:15
Received by: RDH
Checklist completed byeSignature Date
Reviewed by:DateeSignature
Matrices: soilCarrier name: FedEx
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present
Chain of custody present? Yes No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No
Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No
Sample containers intact? Yes No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No
All samples received within holding time? Yes No
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? Yes No
Yes No No VOA vials submittedWater - VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No N/A
Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s): Ambient
Login Notes:
N/A
Cooler(s)/Kit(s):
24-May-12 08-Jun-12 Robert D. Harris Bethany Agarwal
pH adjusted? Yes No N/ApH adjusted by:
Date/Time sample(s) sent to storage:
CorrectiveAction:
Comments:
Client Contacted: Date Contacted: Person Contacted:
Contacted By: Regarding:
SRC Page 1 of 1007701
- Request for Chemical Analysis and Chain of Custody Re REMEDIATIO~ .
12051071 021706 FormWCD-KC1
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Laboratory: ;-\I . S Do(
IIIII --9400 Ward Parkway
/O'jf:O :':>h"xJ;fF Roc,,\ Lat
Kansas City, Missouri 64114 Address:
r--1 Phone: (816) 333·9400 Fax: (816) 822-3494 City/State/Zip: \-\cc<dM (X 770 'J'';}
Attention: ShMo., SheJ~o., Telephone: J.'l;l- ,;::,o. st.s(, ·% Project Number: C,'-/"I}C:, Sample Type ~ ~ --
~i .f Client Name: lv-ls" Fcceb Matrix ~
Sample Number Sample Event Sa(1~~f~~t)Pth cso~~~~~d ~ :!2
i~ i), Group or s~~~;· o;;;~~()' g ;jj ~
~ SWMU Name Date Time (!),
T\=i'\· Sc>I:L () 0 s- ls-"'>H'~ - IX I ICo"'Pos•ie ITrt"~· SED! i""ct~l 0 I) 5 I,;:.~._,, IX i lX !Co•"f''"'h
~
---------)...---!----' 1-
/0 J v ~-~ 1---+-
V/~ "(L: ------
v !A <I ~--/
I/~~~ ;:.----··
.------~-c;. p·
/ .. //-
-~----
--------~---___ ____..I-"
r~-
~ h(///~,,;,_{ &rlv.rl ~- I Special Instructions:
1 va•,~•c• '""""'"'"!·
/J
1ZZ.?Z:Z 6 l~:~/;,~J Received ~"!' c:-cf2~~·:im: I ~:s)::~r~in co~~in['j ,~,,~~•a<uoc vpu" • '"""'P
;_eHnquish8ci By I Date/Time Received By Date/Time .. ,
007702
~:~1li8766 5759 7075
! Your Internal Billing Reference
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 876657597075
007703
Free Flow Vender Bench Testing
007704
~~~ First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation# 100292
- ---=· - 1600 Shore Road o Naperville, Illinois 60563 o Phone (630) 778-1200 • Fax (630) 778-1233 -~
August 07, 2012
Mr. John Renkes
FREE FLOW TECHNOLOGIES 9918 N. Alpine Rd.
McChesney Park, IL 61115
Project ID: 367.01 ALS Global
First Environmental File ID: 12-3711
Date Received: August 03, 2012
Dear Mr. John Renkes:
The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record.
All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAP/NELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QA/QC documentation and raw data will remain on file for future reference. Our accreditation number is 100292 and our current certificate is number 002902: effective 03/08/2012 through 02/28/2013.
I thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to working with you again in the future. Should you have any questions regarding any of the enclosed analytical data or need additional information, please contact me at (630) 778-1200.
Sincerely,
Bill Mottashed Project Manager
Page I of4
007705
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation# 100292
Case Narrative
FREE FLOW TECHNOLOGIES
Project ID: 367.01 ALS Global First Environmental File ID: 12-3711 Date Received: August 03, 2012
I Flagl De cripfion < Analyte not detected at or above the reporting limit.
B Analyte detected in associated method blank.
C Identification confirmed by GC/MS.
0 Surrogates diluted out; recovery not available.
E Estimated result; concentration exceeds calibration range.
F Field measurement.
G Surrogate recovery outside control limits; matrix effect.
H .. I Analysis or extraction holding time exceeded.
J _ I Estimated result; concentration is less than calib range.
K 1 RPD outside control limits. r
I Routine Reporting Limit (Lowest amount that can be
RL detected when routine weights/volumes are used without dilution.)
I Flag I Descrlption I L+ LCS recovery outside control limits; high bias.
L· LCS recovery outside control limits; low bias.
/ M MS recovery outside control limits; LCS acceptable.
I M+ MS recovery outside control limits high bias; LCS acceptable.
M- MS recovery outside control limits low bias; LCS acceptable.
N Analyte is not part of our NELAC accreditation.
NO Analyte was not detected using a library search routine; No calibration standard was analyzed.
P Chemical preservation pH adjusted in lab.
Q The analyte was determined by a GC/MS database search.
S 1 Analyte was sub-contracted to another laboratory for analysis.
I T Sample temperature upon receipt exceeded 0-6°C
W Reporting limit elevated due to sample matrix.
All quality control criteria, as outlined in the methods, have been met except as noted below or on the following analytical report.
Sample Batch Comments:
Time of sample collection was not provided.
Page 2 of4
007706
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation # 100292
Client:
Analytical Report FREE FLOW TECHNOLOGIES Date Collected: 08/01112
Time Collected: Project ID: 367.01 ALS Global
Sample ID: 5% MGO Pure Soil
Sample No: 12-3711-001
Analyte
TCLP Extraction Analysis Date: 08/03/12
TCLP Extraction
pH @ 25°C, TCLP Initial Analysis Date: 08/03/12
pH@ 25°C, TCLP Initial
pH @ 25°C, TCLP Final Analysis Date: 08/06/12
pH@ 25°C, TCLP Final
TCLP Metals Method 1311 Analysis Date: 08/06/12
Cadmium Lead
Date Received: 08/03/12
Date Reported: 08/07/12
Result R.L. Units
Method: 1311
Fluid #I
Method: 1311/9040B
2.46 Units
Method: 1311/9040B
9.94 Units
Method: 6010B Preparation Method 3010A Preparation Date: 08/06/12
0.002 0.001 mg/L < 0.002 0.002 mg/L
Flags
Page 3 of4
007707
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP 1 NELAC Accreditation# 100292
-IIIII!!!_ !-~-!-!,_!.!! 1600 Shore Road • Naperville, Illinois 60563 • Phone (630) 778-1200 • Fax (630) 778-1233 -~
Client:
Analytical Report FREE FLOW TECHNOLOGIES Date Collected: 08/01/12
Time Collected: Project ID: 367.01 ALS Global
Sample ID: 8% MGO Pure Soil
Sample No: 12-3711-002
Analyte
TCLP Extraction Analysis Date: 08/03/12
TCLP Extraction
pH @ 25°C, TCLP Initial Analysis Date: 08/03/12
pH @ 25°C, TCLP Initial
pH @ 25°C, TCLP Final Analysis Date: 08/06/12
pH@ 25°C, TCLP Final
TCLP Metals Method 1311 Analysis Date: 08/06/12
Cadmium Lead
Date Received: 08/03/12
Date Reported: 08/07/12
Result R.L. Units
Method: 1311
Fluid #2
Method: 1311/9040B
5.01 Units
Method: 1311/9040B
9.24 Units
Method: 6010B Preparation Method 3010A Preparation Date: 08/06112
0.041 0.001 mg/L < 0.002 0.002 mg/L
Flags
Page 4 of4
007708
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Page_L of _\_ pgs
Company Name: -=: .......... 1::1 ........ T ....... "--1--~ ... .-I t CiG" I IV WW IIC't;.,j U iV•V'gH:;';:»
Street Address: 001 A 1\1 A I nino Qrl ._._ ~ - .-~ • · '- l FT.--.-~--.;;;;;Jf9 First Environmental Laboratories
1600 Shore Road, Suite D Citv: Machesney PeRk. I L 6~1t15 Zip: Naperville, lllinois 60563 Phone: (630) 778-1200 • Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail: [email protected] IEPA Certification #100292
Project l.D.: 3//J 1 , 0 I P.o.#.: 11-L _~ {;2/.tJ .6/-'I
Matrix Codes: S = Soil W = Water 0 = Other Datelfime Taken Sample Description
PJ/t/1 L. 5 r,... lt1 6-o K.t....-~ , .- ... SO) I ~
_..,
'till I fL- <Y /o _1?1 G-cJ f/v-e <;: o,· 1
Phone:
Send Re.pon To: Sampled By:
Matrix
s X..
5 ~
!:!Jf II /C.. / 0~ fJ1G-O ruve .s )(
So/1
FOR LAB USE ONLY:
Cooler Temperature: 0.1-62C Yes_ No._ 2C Sample Refrigerated: Yes_ No_ Received within 6 hrs. of collection:___ Refrigerator Temperature:___ 2C Ice Present: Yes_ No_ 5035 Vials Frozen: Yes_ No_
Freezer Temperature: ___ 2C
Fax: _!el f!.1 .~-~~~-~'!_~~mail : t-ax ~n o-0311r.~U 0
Analyses
. r11 v
G \)-31\ \ Comments Labi.D.
X.. ~ - ~. ~/ , f ()\[)\ .... --~ l (lJ -"' -LJ
' - fl
X ,_ 1/l)..._LH_ rt;J;J., '- .....
X .#" .J../0/d ~-..c:: .......
Containers Received Preserved: DYes D No
Need to meet: IL. TACO D IN. RISC D
Notes and Special Instructions: ---------- ---------------------------- --------------
2.-0Q Relinquished By: l 4-- r __ r ---.J.L ' Datc:!Iime ca\ ~\I 2.... I ~ Received By: ~cp-- Datelfime 8 \ a\ 11 Relinquished By:t/ 1!:2... Datelfime Received By: Datelfime ___ \ ___ \~------Rev. 9/08
007709
EnviroBlend Vendor Bench Testing
007710
Sample Name Ursus Lab ID Arsenic Cadmium Lead
TFM ‐ Soil 12‐06006 47.4 322 9,410 Ursus Lab ID Chemical Percentage Pretest pH Solution Final pH Arsenic mg/l Cadmium mg/L Lead mg/L
TFM ‐ Sediment 12‐06007 17.0 211 3,512 TFM ‐ Soil 12‐06006 Untreated ‐ 1.88 TCLP 1 5.54 <0.030 7.06 29.6
EnviroMag® Coarse 3.0% ‐ TCLP 1 7.03 <0.030 3.32 2.954.0% 5.07 TCLP 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
EnviroBlend® CS 6.0% ‐ TCLP 2 6.55 <0.030 4.47 7.24
7.0% ‐ TCLP 2 6.70 <0.030 4.25 4.53
8.0% ‐ TCLP 2 6.90 <0.030 3.46 3.46
10.0% ‐ TCLP 2 7.97 <0.030 0.64 0.26
11.0% ‐ TCLP 2 9.18 <0.030 0.041 0.1112.0% ‐ TCLP 2 9.23 <0.030 0.026 0.13
TFM ‐ Sediment 12‐06007 Untreated ‐ 2.64 TCLP 1 4.94 <0.030 2.79 2.20
EnviroMag® Coarse 3.0% ‐ TCLP 1 7.34 <0.030 1.21 0.0934.0% 4.06 TCLP 1 9.37 <0.030 <0.024 <0.067
EnviroBlend® CS 6.0% ‐ TCLP 2 6.41 <0.030 2.30 0.31
7.0% ‐ TCLP 2 8.53 <0.030 0.12 <0.0678.0% ‐ TCLP 2 9.12 <0.030 0.027 <0.067
TREATABILITY STUDY RESULTSPremier: Burns & McDonnell ‐ Tulsa Fuels
June 11, 2012
NOTES:
1. The screening TCLP test is a modified, scaled‐down TCLP leaching test that gives results that are similar to those of a standard TCLP test on the waste material. The screening test is not suitable for regulatory submittals.
2. Premier Chemicals product EnviroBlend® in the ground form was used in the treatability study. Other products and particle sizes should be tested to ensure that they provide comparable results prior to using the other products.
3. The treatability results demonstrate the effect of the treatment on the samples tested. Extrapolation of the results to waste streams or contaminated sites depends on the representativeness of the samples collected.
Compositional Results (mg/kg)
Sample Name
EnviroBlend® Dosage Screening Leaching Test Results
Leaching Results
007711
Client Premier Magnesia, LLC West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2998 (PH):610-828-6929
Comments Comp and TCLP As, Cd, Pb. EB study.
Contact: Derek Pizarro Date Received: 6/6/2012Project Name: Burns & McDonnell - Tusla Fuels Ursus Batch ID: 12-055Project Type: Metals
Ursus Lab ID Sample Name Sample Date Sample Matrix Sample wt. (g) Sample Comments12-06006 TFM - Soil 5/31/2012 Soil 2 gal Untreated waste12-06007 TFM - Sediment 5/31/2012 Soil 2 gal Untreated waste
Sample Login Report
007712
TerraBond Vendor Bench Testing
007713
Tulsa Fuels
Sample Description TCLP As TCLP Cd TCLP Pb LAboratory ID
Untreated 0.05 U 9.25 26.8 ALS
6% TerraBond-LA na 2.73 0.362 12008940-1
7% TerraBond-LA na 0.112 <0.200 12008940-2
8% TerraBond-LA na 0.095 <0.200 12008940-3
Untreated 0.05 U 3.27 2.65 ALS
6% TerraBond-LA na 1.95 0.291 12008940-4
7% TerraBond-LA na 0.165 <0.200 12008940-5
8% TerraBond-LA na <0.050 <0.200 12008940-6
Soil
Sediment
007714
APPENDIX C
Field Treatability Photographic Log
007715
Adding reagent to soil. Mixing reagent and soil.
007716
Mixing reagent and soil. Treated soil placed back in excavataion.
007717
Sediment removed from the Mid Site Ravine Sediment removed from the Mid Site Ravine
007718
Sediment removed from the Mid Site Ravine
Mixing reagent and sediment.
007719
APPENDIX D
Analytical Laboratory Data for Field Testing
007720
01-Oct-2012
Remediation Services, IncGrant Sherwwood
Dear Grant,
Re: Tulsa Fuels Bench Work Order: 1209748
Fax: (620) 331-6216Tel: (620) 331-1200
2735 South 10th StreetIndependence, KS 67301
ALS Environmental received 12 samples on 21-Sep-2012 08:55 AM for the analyses presented in the following report.
Project ManagerBethany McDanielElectronically approved by: Luke F. Hernandez
Certificate No: KS: E-10352
This is a REVISED REPORT. Please see the Case Narrative for discussion concerning this revision.
The total number of pages in this revised report is 14.
Regards,
ADDRESS 10450 Stancliff Rd, Suite 210 Houston, Texas 77099-4338 | PHONE (281) 530-5656 | FAX (281) 530-5887ALS GROUP USA, CORP Part of the ALS Laboratory Group A Cam pbell Brothers Lim ited Com pany
1 of 14007721
Date: 01-Oct-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa Fuels BenchClient: Remediation Services, Inc
Work Order: 1209748Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date ReceivedMatrix Hold1209748-01 Soil-Enviroblend CS 10% Soil 9/19/2012 11:30 9/21/2012 08:551209748-02 Soil -Enviroblend CS 11% Soil 9/19/2012 13:06 9/21/2012 08:551209748-03 Sediment -Enviroblend CS 7% Soil 9/20/2012 11:30 9/21/2012 08:551209748-04 Sediment-Enviroblend CS 8% Soil 9/20/2012 10:25 9/21/2012 08:551209748-05 Soil -Terrabond LA 7% Soil 9/19/2012 17:05 9/21/2012 08:551209748-06 Soil -Terrabond LA 8% Soil 9/19/2012 17:55 9/21/2012 08:551209748-07 Sediment -Terrabond LA 7% Soil 9/20/2012 08:25 9/21/2012 08:551209748-08 Sediment -Terrabond LA 8% Soil 9/20/2012 09:35 9/21/2012 08:551209748-09 Soil -Free Flow MGO 5% Soil 9/19/2012 15:00 9/21/2012 08:551209748-10 Soil -Free Flow MGO 8% Soil 9/19/2012 16:00 9/21/2012 08:551209748-11 Sediment -Free Flow MGO 5% Soil 9/20/2012 12:30 9/21/2012 08:551209748-12 Sediment -Free Flow MGO 8% Soil 9/20/2012 13:20 9/21/2012 08:55
SS Page 1 of 12 of 14
007722
Date: 01-Oct-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa Fuels BenchClient: Remediation Services, Inc
Work Order: 1209748Case Narrative
This report was revised on October 1, 2012 to correct client sample ID's for 1209748-07 and 1209748-08.
CN Page 1 of 1
3 of 14
007723
Project: Tulsa Fuels BenchClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 1209748
ALS Environmental Date: 01-Oct-12
Client Sample ID: Soil-Enviroblend CS 10%Lab ID: 1209748-01A Collection Date: 9/19/2012 11:30:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 04:47 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 04:47 PM0.0200 mg/L 100.0814Lead 9/26/2012 04:47 PM0.0500 mg/L 10ND
Client Sample ID: Soil -Enviroblend CS 11%Lab ID: 1209748-02A Collection Date: 9/19/2012 1:06:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 04:49 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 04:49 PM0.0200 mg/L 104.22Lead 9/26/2012 04:49 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.125
Client Sample ID: Sediment -Enviroblend CS 7%Lab ID: 1209748-03A Collection Date: 9/20/2012 11:30:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 04:52 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 04:52 PM0.0200 mg/L 100.0499Lead 9/26/2012 04:52 PM0.0500 mg/L 10ND
Client Sample ID: Sediment-Enviroblend CS 8%Lab ID: 1209748-04A Collection Date: 9/20/2012 10:25:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 04:54 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 04:54 PM0.0200 mg/L 10NDLead 9/26/2012 04:54 PM0.0500 mg/L 10ND
AR Page 1 of 3
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
4 of 14
007724
Project: Tulsa Fuels BenchClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 1209748
ALS Environmental Date: 01-Oct-12
Client Sample ID: Soil -Terrabond LA 7%Lab ID: 1209748-05A Collection Date: 9/19/2012 5:05:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 04:56 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.126Cadmium 9/27/2012 02:00 PM0.200 mg/L 10017.1Lead 9/26/2012 04:56 PM0.0500 mg/L 106.88
Client Sample ID: Soil -Terrabond LA 8%Lab ID: 1209748-06A Collection Date: 9/19/2012 5:55:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 04:59 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.0981Cadmium 9/26/2012 04:59 PM0.0200 mg/L 1015.6Lead 9/26/2012 04:59 PM0.0500 mg/L 101.40
Client Sample ID: Sediment -Terrabond LA 7%Lab ID: 1209748-07A Collection Date: 9/20/2012 8:25:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 04:26 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 04:26 PM0.0200 mg/L 10NDLead 9/26/2012 04:26 PM0.0500 mg/L 10ND
Client Sample ID: Sediment -Terrabond LA 8%Lab ID: 1209748-08A Collection Date: 9/20/2012 9:35:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 05:01 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 05:01 PM0.0200 mg/L 102.08Lead 9/26/2012 05:01 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.935
AR Page 2 of 3
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
5 of 14
007725
Project: Tulsa Fuels BenchClient: Remediation Services, Inc Work Order: 1209748
ALS Environmental Date: 01-Oct-12
Client Sample ID: Soil -Free Flow MGO 5%Lab ID: 1209748-09A Collection Date: 9/19/2012 3:00:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 05:03 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 05:03 PM0.0200 mg/L 104.23Lead 9/26/2012 05:03 PM0.0500 mg/L 100.150
Client Sample ID: Soil -Free Flow MGO 8%Lab ID: 1209748-10A Collection Date: 9/19/2012 4:00:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 05:05 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 05:05 PM0.0200 mg/L 101.49Lead 9/26/2012 05:05 PM0.0500 mg/L 10ND
Client Sample ID: Sediment -Free Flow MGO 5%Lab ID: 1209748-11A Collection Date: 9/20/2012 12:30:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 05:21 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 05:21 PM0.0200 mg/L 102.60Lead 9/26/2012 05:21 PM0.0500 mg/L 106.03
Client Sample ID: Sediment -Free Flow MGO 8%Lab ID: 1209748-12A Collection Date: 9/20/2012 1:20:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedReport Limit
Dilution Factor
TCLP METALS SW1311/6020 Analyst: SKSPrep Date: 9/26/2012Arsenic 9/26/2012 05:24 PM0.0500 mg/L 10NDCadmium 9/26/2012 05:24 PM0.0200 mg/L 10NDLead 9/26/2012 05:24 PM0.0500 mg/L 10ND
AR Page 3 of 3
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
6 of 14
007726
Date: 01-Oct-12ALS Environmental
Project: Tulsa Fuels Bench
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 1209748
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 64500 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 9/26/2012 04:17 PM
Prep Date: 9/26/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2957730
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120926A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKT1-092212-64500
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020ND
JLead 0.0500.007847
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 9/26/2012 04:20 PM
Prep Date: 9/26/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2957731
MBLK
Run ID: ICPMS05_120926A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MBLKW3-092612-64500
Arsenic 0.050NDCadmium 0.020NDLead 0.050ND
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 9/26/2012 06:18 PM
Prep Date: 9/26/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: SeqNo: 2957861
LCS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120926A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: MLCSW3-092612-64500
000.5Arsenic 111 80-1200.0500.5533000.5Cadmium 114 80-1200.0200.571000.5Lead 113 80-1200.0500.5669
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 9/26/2012 04:31 PM
Prep Date: 9/26/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: Sediment -Terrabond LA 7% SeqNo: 2957736
MS
Run ID: ICPMS05_120926A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1209748-07AMS
00.011070.5Arsenic 115 75-1250.0500.587200.0006150.5Cadmium 110 75-1250.0200.550300.041270.5Lead 109 75-1250.0500.5873
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 9/26/2012 04:33 PM
Prep Date: 9/26/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: Sediment -Terrabond LA 7% SeqNo: 2957737
MSD
Run ID: ICPMS05_120926A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1209748-07AMSD
0.58720.011070.5Arsenic 104 75-125 250.050 10.30.52980.55030.0006150.5Cadmium 103 75-125 250.020 6.960.51330.58730.041270.5Lead 105 75-125 250.050 3.360.5679
QC Page: 1 of 2Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
7 of 14007727
Project: Tulsa Fuels Bench
Client: Remediation Services, IncWork Order: 1209748
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID: 64500 Instrument ID ICPMS05 Method: SW1311/6020
QualRPD Limit
Analysis Date: 9/26/2012 04:29 PM
Prep Date: 9/26/2012
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units: mg/L
PQL
Client ID: Sediment -Terrabond LA 7% SeqNo: 2957735
DUP
Run ID: ICPMS05_120926A
SPK ValSPK Ref
ValueRPD Ref
ValueControl
Limit
DF: 10
Sample ID: 1209748-07ADUP
0.0110700Arsenic 0 0-0 250.050 0ND0.00061500Cadmium 0 0-0 250.020 0ND
J0.0412700Lead 0 0-0 250.050 00.04189
The following samples were analyzed in this batch: 1209748-01A 1209748-02A 1209748-03A1209748-04A 1209748-05A 1209748-06A1209748-07A 1209748-08A 1209748-09A1209748-10A 1209748-11A 1209748-12A
QC Page: 2 of 2Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
8 of 14007728
ALS Environmental Date: 01-Oct-12
QUALIFIERS, ACRONYMS, UNITS
Project: Tulsa Fuels BenchClient: Remediation Services, Inc
WorkOrder: 1209748
Units Reported Description
Qualifier Description
Acronym Description
Milligrams per Litermg/L
Value exceeds Regulatory Limit*Not accreditedaAnalyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting LimitBValue above quantitation rangeEAnalyzed outside of Holding TimeHAnalyte detected below quantitation limitJManually integrated, see raw data for justificationMNot offered for accreditationnNot Detected at the Reporting LimitNDSample amount is > 4 times amount spikedODual Column results percent difference > 40%PRPD above laboratory control limitRSpike Recovery outside laboratory control limitsSAnalyzed but not detected above the MDLU
Detectability Check StudyDCS
Method DuplicateDUP
Laboratory Control SampleLCS
Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateLCSD
Method BlankMBLK
Method Detection LimitMDL
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Matrix SpikeMS
Matrix Spike DuplicateMSD
Post Digestion SpikePDS
Practical Quantitation LimitPQL
Serial DilutionSD
Sample Detection LimitSDL
Texas Risk Reduction ProgramTRRP
QF Page 1 of 1
9 of 14
007729
ALS Environmental
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client Name: REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.-
Work Order: 1209748
Date/Time Received: 21-Sep-12 08:55
Received by: RDN
Checklist completed byeSignature Date
Reviewed by:DateeSignature
Matrices: soilCarrier name: FedEx
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present
Chain of custody present? Yes No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No
Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No
Sample containers intact? Yes No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No
All samples received within holding time? Yes No
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? Yes No
Yes No No VOA vials submittedWater - VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No N/A
Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s): 2.9 C,3.3 C/uc
Login Notes:
IR Gun
Cooler(s)/Kit(s): 3243/3722
21-Sep-12 24-Sep-12 Johnnie B. Allen Bethany McDaniel
pH adjusted? Yes No N/ApH adjusted by:
Date/Time sample(s) sent to storage: 09/21/12 16:50
CorrectiveAction:
Comments:
Client Contacted: Date Contacted: Person Contacted:
Contacted By: Regarding:
SRC Page 1 of 110 of 14
007730
11 of 14
Enuironmrental
Cindnna\i, OH +1 513 733 5336
Everett, WA + 1 4Z5 356 Z600
For\ Collins, CO +1 9704901511
Holland, Ml +16163996070
-
Chain of Custody Form I Page _!_of .2__ I
coc 10:68408 ALS· Project Manager:
Customer Information Project Information
1209748 I • . . I
REMEDIATION SERVICES, INC.-KS: Remediation Services, Inc
Project: Tulsa Fuels Bench ~ :
I IIIII I IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII 1111111111 1111 II II
PYrcha~:Order __ _:?..L~"j_:_~--------f=-~~:e:ctNafl1:c-LTuisa Fuels Be~J<h "'oi:"~------· / ~ -~LP Melals_~'W-846) Pb,Cd,As ··-:
~.,)~~~3~d•[c_ --------------.. --.. --G~r()j~t~~!Tl~~'- --- ,Zl_~3 d-.__ _____ .... ·'" ·--·-·-·· ·-------·---------------- -------~
I :~~;:;~~;: · _·_:_:~_~e_di .. :t_,~:_:~~-:;r __ v_c~s-. \-nc __________ -__ -_ j~~~~:~~~~ _ :::~:~:~::.:3ertices:l~--- _ c ____ ---===---.,_-----··---··--·~---------------------~------~------_-.: ---==-~-.. --f t • . . , I
Ad~\~~~·:,< 273!3 South 10th ~~tn•et I Address 27:35 South 10th Street ~ _____ __ __ -~
;'>·, .. :>:.~~-·: ... -'::_~ ------·-- _ __j________ ----------- - - ------------------------------
.... · .. Ph~re (620) 331-1:'00 Phone (620) 331-1200 H
[-7~-~ f#, (6;;;;~- ------ --~;~ ~;~-6-----------Pt P--e-·-Maii_A_. d-d(es~ --- e-Mail Address TJr ----· ------·--------------------No. ---·--~~e.scr_iPti~r oa·te Tirile Matrix Pres. ! .. # .. sottl_es A ~ p o E. ': F.~:-TJf--.1-. -~rffHOid~
~ Soil_- Enviroblend CS!O% ________ ~-"!_: IH::l_ t,Jl"!,_;) _____ s""_j ___ _,----L---j-+---j--~---~ -, -j- __ j ___ D !_ Sotl- Enviroblend CS1'1% __ -~..1.: .. tq-J-:J_ ___ j __ l~ob_ __ ~0~--- +---1---- __ --1--~--l----f------1-- __________ j i]
Sed1ment- Envtroblend c::· -- · - 1
r · ~oil _ Te,;~b:·~~~;,::'i~; cs /3% __ -·-···1 ,",:::· . I ',';;, ~~ : · ·----1 _ !__ - 1
__
1 J-j--1-1 1
: -F o-" __ 6 ____ ~~~~_t:::._~-------.. ~"~··1-t-:> ____ -~~~ __ _!.."ii_ _____ f _=:]j l. - !-. +-···· J ] __ _!_ ._J _____ _ _!__ Sedrment - Terrabond LA 7% ________ 1· ,.,_,, _ ___Lo·ps ___ _ Soil _ 1 f- : _ __ I ____ [-l ··• \ 0 __
I a _Sr)dir~_ent ~Terrabong LA 3'7~--------1 'i-~-"· o --~--cH5" ___ _j__ Soil ---,~--~~·--+- --+---l---,---+-~-1------;~~ ::;;; : :;;: :;;~~ ~~-~~ ::~------ -----t~~ ;~~ :: I_~~~- --~-:::: -----1-------1--·······1---+---·!--...... -- ____ jl_ :--!-) __ "~-----!-------
1 , , lo I
s. am.pler.{s).Pieasep_.r,.lnt&·~.U_._ /_.· ·/· .' Shipm_:ntMethod ResultsDue·-oate:
']) .. .,;.t ~1.,..1- ~ lP r: .. ~ f• - .. --
:~~~-_:_--:-1
T•mk , [ Aece.,ed by; · -- -··- -· ···----- -- No::~leitD 10 ~:~,:,::~p. QC Package: {Chiick One Box Below} I
' V\) .. &~ Level il Sld QC C) TRRP ClleckUs! logge~.by (Labo'rato!YJ.i i !.Time: [J i...evel :n s.td QCJRaw Dala C} TRRP L~ve! IV
~---"·: ____ .,, .. ~"---'-:---""'"'-j_: -,---··--·--· _"_J_ .. .:. __ .-L_...,~-·· ._ _ _;_[_ ___ . ·--~·-··--·-------- [J Leve-l N SW84G/CLP ' Preservative Key: ~1-HCI 2.-HN03 3-H,S04 4-NaOH 8-4oC 9·5035 _[]_ 01iwr IEDP
Note: 1. Any changes must be made in writing once samples and COC Form have been submitted to ALS Envir-onmental. Copyright 2011 by ALS El-tvironmental. 2. Unless otherwise agreed in a form~li contract, services provided by ALS Envinmmentat are expressly limited to the terms and conditions st01ted on the reverse. · 3. The Chain of Custody is a legal document. All information must be completed accurately.
007731
12 of 14
Cincinnati, OH +1 513 733 5336
Everett, WA + 1 425 356 2600
Fort Collins, CO +1 9704901511
Holland, Ml + 1 616 399 6070
Chain of Custody Form I Page ~~~.:2._ I
COC ID: 6 8 4 Q 7
Houston, TX +1 281 530 5656
Middletown, PA +1 717944 5541
Spring City, PA +16109484903
Salt Lake City, UT + 1 801 266 7700
South :charleston, WV +1 304 356 3168
York, PA +1 71'? 505 5280
Enuironmental I AI.S Project Manager:J i I AI.SWorkOrcler#:J (,J.() '117&/!if? t Customer Information Project Information Parameter/Method Request for Analysis
L_P_u_r_ch_a_se_o_rd_e_r --~-/_d-._~_3_::::2---____________ 1 ""~ '~' '""' '"'' •- ~>< Work Order Project Number 8
AI TCLP Metals (SW-846) Pb,Cd,As
t~.:·p·;·i;·y·.-P·:·;·· .. :·· .. ··:·.··.: .. ,:.~ .•. ".,: ... ~ .. ~.- ~=~~;;;;~~ ~-~------- '·~:; .• :.;·~· -- '' ~.~====-~-· · .• Ad~res~ Address, rF --------- I
, ____ ;-:-f~-·~::<·>·:::·:_·._ .. :~ --··-- G. ·r -~i9S~~~-~{~_i:~:·.~ Independence, KS 67301 ·-~~-.· -. !ndep~-~:!ence, KS 67301 ___ .. :--1 ---·-~·--- ...... -~---~-------1-·
tj ... •··.•.· .. ···.·.·~.P.: •. -.. h·o•.·.·.··.".·.e····.·.· .... -.-.\ (620)331::_12_1l_CJ______ ... --.P ...• h.one. (620)331-1200 H.·L· .. ·· ---·--~-~---~-~--~--ISJ~> • • Fax (620) 331-6216 Fax (620) 331-62'16 1
·:·· e~Mau Add~!9s~ -- I e-MaitAddr:ess J - J \
I e f Time I . ~atrix I Pres: I #Bottles} A I B II iC I D -~ E I F I 9. r 1;1 I I I ~ I Hold .i:
-1- ~~;; I :::: I I ~--1--J : --1-+ I nl i ~~ __J
!l.
I ----+- 11-------t-
-·1----~ I
3 1-:-':'+- --- 1-- . ----1--------t--
4
~ - -+-7
-+-I
i ~-
---j --- - ---r------ t' 1--~--- 4----~1-------t---r , --1---~-, -- 4 ----TI ---+---+--1· ---r-
1 --1--, 9
8
10
Sam .. · pler(.s}·Pie~.se Pr_int & Signij~A. ----------- -~-Shipment MethOd_____ I Required TurnaroundTime.--:--(C.lieck Box) . _ .;
U;,;.t ~ci- __$./ .!f& ,::;,) t:)r lviStdiOWKDavs il5WKDavs PI~~J~Days r124Hour
I Results Due Date: l f
107-.U:~-~;_ ITimj:<../30
I Received by: Notes: '!O Da.yTAT.
··-·~--TO --~ -----~1 Time: -~~=·- "TRCCeive-:- (La~atory): ··---~~---·---1--::C-oo-:t-.,-:,::D-t, "l'"'::c:-o-ot:-.-,.t:e:-m-p:-_-r-:Q:-:C~P::'a-c7k-ag-e-,-:(:::C:-he,.c":k":O::'n-e-:B::-o-x-:B:;e-:to"'w-:):-+--..-,----H
I 2 d{, : .. S ~ ! 'i;-...) ! LewH I! Std ClC 1·1 :1RRP Chock\. Logged by (Laboratory): j D_ j i Time: Level m S!d QC/Raw Data [J TRRP Love! IV
;-":~----·----·-- .. ·~------·-·-·-··----~·--1-L-----·-·-L .. __ ~ .. : --~--.-.. -........ " .... ---------;..__--.... -~--· ....... ~- Level iV SW34fl/CLP PreservativeKey: 1'HCI 2cHNO, 3cH2S04 4-NaOH 6'NaHS04 7-0ther 8-4°C 9-5035 OtheriEDD
' Note: l. Any changes must be made in writing once samples and COC Form have been submitted to ALS Environmental. 2. Unless otherwise agreed in a formal contract, services provided by ALS Environmental nrc expressly limited to the terms and conditions stated on the reverse. ~ Tlw C'h:1in nff'n.::tnrlv i.:: n lpo:1l ilm•mnPnt_ All infnrmntinn mlt<;t lw cnmnlefed ~lccuratelv.
Copyright 2011 by ALS' Environmental.
007732
13 of 14
007733
14 of 14
~·· ~~ ~. .. : .· .. ,.
Seat Broken By!
Pa.te-:
007734
APPENDIX E
Preliminary Waste Volume Calculations
007735
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
"Old" U.S.Highway 169
C
Atchinson TopekaSanta Fe Railroad
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
Pond 4
Pond 3
Access Road/Driveway
Intermitte
nt Drainage
Pond 1Pond 2
Pond 5
Strip Mine Pit
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
SP-60
SP-59SP-58SP-57
SP-56
SP-55
SP-54
TR-12
TR-04
TR-16
TR-17
TR-15TR-14
TR-18
TR-20
TR-08TR-09
TR-10TR-13
TR-19
TR-21
TR-03TR-06
TR-07TR-11
TR-02
TR-05
TR-01
SP-08
SP-12SP-14
SP-15
SP-07
SP-06
SP-05SP-04
SP-02
SP-47
SP-40
SP-53
SP-50SP-51SP-52
SP-49
SP-48SP-46
SP-41SP-42
SP-43SP-44
SP-38
SP-37SP-36SP-35SP-34
SP-39
SP-25SP-26
SP-27
SP-28
SP-30SP-31SP-32SP-33
SP-24
SP-23SP-22SP-21SP-20SP-19SP-18SP-17SP-16
SP-09SP-10
SP-11SP-13
SP-03SP-01
SP-30
SP-45
SP-29
TR-37
VP-69
VP-68
TP-07
TR-55TR-28 VP-55
TR-29
VP-70
VP-54
TR-27 TR-26
VP-50VP-51
VP-53
VP-52
TR-25
VP-67
TR-54TR-41
TR-53
TR-31
TR-30
TR-32
TR-22
TR-33
VP-42
VP-43VP-44
VP-45
VP-46
TR-23
VP-49
TR-24
VP-48TR-52
TR-40 TR-51TR-50
VP-66
TP-05VP-65 TR-49
VP-64
VP-63
TR-48
TR-46
TR-39
TR-45VP-62
TR-42
VP-56VP-57
VP-58
TR-43
VP-59VP-60
TR-44
TR-34
TR-47
TR-38
TR-35
TR-36
VP-47
TP-04
TP-01
TP-02
TP-03
TP-06
VP-61
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2012\Renumber\Fig3-2_Estimated_Depth_of_Waste_Collinsville_OK.mxd sos Nov 2, 2012
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
ESTIMATED DEPTH OFWASTE MATERIALS
Figure 3-2
LEGEND
Visual Pits
Surface/Subsurface (RI)
Trenching/Test Pit Locations
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Hydrography
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Roads
150 0 150
S C A L E I N F E E T
Areas where smelter waste was visually observedduring the Remedial Investigation and RemedialDesign are shown.
The values presented on the figure indicate themaximum depth at which waste materials wereobserved.
The Access Road/Driveway is composed of wastematerials < 1 ft bgs.
FT BGS = Feet below ground surface
NORTH
NOTE:
< 1 FT BGS
1 -2 FT BGS
2 - 3 FT BGS
3 - 5 FT BGS
5 - 7 FT BGS
Estimated Depth of Waste VisuallObserved During RI and RD
007736
Oklahoma DEQ\64496\Treatability Rpt\Table E-1_Fig3-2_Estimated_Depth_of_Waste.xlsx Page 1 of 1
Table E-1Estimated Waste Volume1
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design
Depth Layer Perimeter Impacted Area in Sq Ft Cubic Ft Cubic Yards2
< 1 FT 766.36 19032.60< 1 FT 4557.99 14798.46< 1 FT 727.31 29841.69< 1 FT 327.76 7882.44< 1 FT 217.14 3729.52< 1 FT 817.29 38061.49< 1 FT 836.61 28340.49< 1 FT 680.07 32599.96Total 174286.66 174286.66 6455.06
1-2 FT 1008.98 12372.101-2 FT 224.82 3738.171-2 FT 588.20 13888.661-2 FT 2970.22 146398.021-2 FT 954.15 8287.021-2 FT 195.29 2363.741-2 FT 895.52 12095.73Total 199143.43 398286.86 14751.37
2-3 FT 1374.46 28721.602-3 FT 1869.07 84204.612-3 FT 3299.57 180974.64Total 293900.85 881702.54 32655.65
3-5 FT 418.24 11434.773-5 FT 922.31 14203.473-5 FT 1041.93 9599.963-5 FT 68.97 35.213-5 FT 3183.92 154188.593-5 FT 361.28 6458.833-5 FT 386.58 7888.87Total 203809.71 1019048.53 37742.54
5-7 FT 596.08 11500.535-7 FT 575.62 13622.945-7 FT 3003.01 183470.42Total 208593.88 1460157.16 54079.89
Total Waste Volume 145684.51
ft = feetsq ft = square feet
1Waste volumes were estimated using the waste areas and depth intervals identified on Figure 3-2 Estimated Depth of Waste Materials from the Remedial Design Data Evaluation Summary Report.
2Cubic yards were calculated assuming the lowest depth interval to the waste. For example, the volume calcualtion for the 1-2 ft depth layer = (sq ft of impacted area x 2 ft deep) / 27 cubic ft per cubic yard
007737