Final Proposed School Budget 2014-15

Proposed District Budget 2014-2015

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The preparation of the annual budget is a substantial leadership responsibility. Recent trends in the country’s business community and the school community suggest that quality is achieved through the involvement of many persons.

The development of the proposed 2014-2015 School District budget is consistent with the trends aiming toward quality. The District administrators, building administrators, teachers, staff, parents, and indirectly students, all had input into the development of the

budget. All are to be commended.

Collaboration requires leadership. Keeping people included and focused upon a common mission requires greater leadership and time. The people whose names appear below provided the leadership that made the development of the proposed budget possible.

Ms. Maureen Boozang-Hill, Director of Pupil Personnel Services Ms. Maria Catalina, Executive Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction

Ms. Regina M. Cellio, Principal, Anne M. Dorner Middle School Ms. Jean Chen, Treasurer

Ms. Ann Dealy, Principal, Brookside School Mr. James Dennett, Director of Health, Physical Education, and Athletics

Ms. Joan Garone, Executive Assistant for Human Resources and Title IX Coordinator Mr. Andrew Lennon, Assistant Business Administrator

Mr. Jeremy Luft, Director of Technology Mr. Joshua Mandel, Principal, Ossining High School

Ms. Victoria Marrin, Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent for Business Ms. Kate Mathews, Principal, Claremont School Mr. James Minihan, Transportation Supervisor Mr. Bradley Morrison, Director of Cultural Arts

Ms. Ileana Ortiz, District Clerk Ms. Mirla Puello, Director of Literacy and ESL

Ms. Nicole Reis, Executive Assistant to the Superintendent Dr. Corey Reynolds, Principal, Roosevelt School

Ms. Carrieann Sipos, Principal, Park School Mr. Kenneth Waldron, Director of School Facilities, Operations and Maintenance

Dr. Angela White, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction Ms. Alita Zuber, Assistant Superintendent for Business

The efforts extended by the people named above are gratefully acknowledged.

Mr. Raymond Sanchez Superintendent of Schools

OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Mr. Raymond Sanchez Superintendent of Schools April 23, 2014

CONFIDENTIAL

MEMORANDUM TO: Ossining School District Community FROM: Raymond Sanchez Superintendent of Schools

Alita Zuber Assistant Superintendent for Business Dr. Angela White Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction RE: Board of Education School District Budget: 2014-2015 School Year INTRODUCTION

In the Ossining School District, we are dedicated to ensuring that all students are educated well. Our goal is to prepare our students to be successful in whatever they choose to do after graduating from Ossining High School. The budget serves as a “means to an end,” providing the resources necessary to ensure that we can and will achieve that goal. Yet, at the same time, we must understand and respond to the fiscal needs of our community.

This year’s budget focuses on three areas:

Educational Solvency: Ensuring that we provide educational programs that meet the needs and interests of our students.

Security: Enhancing security equipment throughout our schools to ensure the safety of our students.

Space: Addressing the need for adequate instructional space across the district.

BUDGET PROCESS

The budget process began with a meeting of our Administrative Team to review the effectiveness of our existing programs. At the same time, members of the Citizen’s Budget Advisory Committee lobbied the state on the District’s need for additional Foundation Aid. These efforts included a community forum, letters, meetings with legislators and numerous trips to Albany. We also spoke at the state Budget Hearing.

Due to the efforts of our community, we did receive additional Foundation Aid of $483,690. However, it still remains below the total we are entitled to receive.

2

Our approach to the budget has been both transparent and collaborative. We have worked hard to ensure that the budget provides programs that meet the needs of every child in our District and help to avoid educational insolvency.

GOALS OF OUR BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

It has been noted in our presentations that we had the following goals in mind during the development of this budget.

Avoid educational insolvency by continuing advocacy efforts to increase the Foundation Aid that Ossining is legally entitled to receive, which is projected to be an additional $10M in 2014-15.

Continue to maintain transparency through surveys, informational meetings, and Community Budget Advisory Committee efforts.

Continue to evaluate opportunities for sustainable budget savings and slowing expenditure growth.

AREAS OF FOCUS: EDUCATIONAL SOLVENCY, SECURITY AND SPACE

Educational Solvency:

This budget reflects the continuation of our electives at Ossining High School, the Science Research Program, after school programs at AMD and programs in the arts and athletics. Based on our February 26th Board of Education meeting and survey results, we know our community values teacher to student ratio. We have been experiencing increases in enrollment. Yet, we have made every effort to ensure that we address the need for instructional staff in grades PreK-12. Particular emphasis has been made to address class size at AMD. This budget also seeks to address the needs in Special Education and English as a Second Language classes.

We have dissected every non-instructional area in search of efficiency, economies of scale, and expense reductions wherever possible to preserve as many programs for as long as possible. In 2013, we successfully reversed the trajectory of health costs as well as administrative and transportation expenses growth back to 2009 levels. Additional savings/cost avoidance measures include the following:

Identified $4.6 million in capital improvements with no budget impact through an Energy Performance Contract (EPC).

Received $2.5 million in competitive grants. Negotiated 0% increases for teacher and administrator contracts. Saved $1.2 million over 12 years by re-financing bonds.

3

Throughout the process, we carefully considered the impact that the decisions would have on our students. Our goal is to ensure that the needs of our students are met and that we take into account the values of our community. Again, our focus is to remain educationally solvent.

Safety And Space

The Administration and Board of Education recognize the importance of budgeting for building maintenance and understand the long-term effects of not supporting funds for capital projects. While the capital bond project approved in March 2012 by our community will help to provide significant improvements to our facilities, it does not meet all of the District's needs. As a result, the District continues to recommend the funding of the transfer-to-capital budget line to ensure that we continue to address some of our on-going capital improvements not included in the capital bond. Additionally, one of the Board’s goals is to address future space needs in our elementary schools. The 2014-15 Budget reflects these anticipated needs. It also calls for the relocation of administrative offices. In doing so, it will ensure we have additional space in our elementary schools to support the increasing enrollment.

Student safety continues to be a district priority. As such, the 2014-15 budget contains funds for additional cameras and an improved surveillance system that will help emergency response efforts.

Savings from closing capital projects completed below budget as well as remaining funds from the self-insured health and long-term disability plans no longer needed since the District has moved to predictable premium based plans are being used as appropriated fund balance. These savings and remaining funds will be used to cover non-recurring expenses to avoid a cliff in the following year when the funds are no longer available. New, recurring expenses like the lease for storage and administrative space will be offset with budget reductions in non-instructional areas and revenue increases in building aid

OTHER AREAS OF INTEREST

Transportation

As part of the budget, we will be asking our community to consider voting on decreasing the transportation mileage limits for Claremont School. We are recommending that we decrease the limits to .5 miles for students in grade 4. Below you find details related to the proposal.

Grade Level Current Mileage Limit Proposed Mileage Limit Grade 3 ½ mile ½ mile Grade 4 1 mile ½ mile

This change will not impact the District budget. Yet, our community must vote to make the change. This change will be put to the voters by way of a separate proposition at the annual election and meeting on May 20th.

4

REVENUES

The final New York State legislative budget provides for an additional $1,456,508 in school aid for Ossining School District.

Other Revenue Sources

There are other limited revenue sources that comprise the total revenue to support the budget. The two major areas are composed of state aid and property taxes. At this time, the District anticipates that it will realize approximately $18,024,924 in revenues other than property taxes and appropriation of Fund Balance for the 2014-2015 school year. This compares with $16,425,500 which the District had anticipated last year at this time for the current 2013-2014 school year. We will continue to monitor revenue projections and will adjust accordingly, prior to setting the tax warrant.

Proposed Budget and Tax Levy

Our 2014-2015 proposed budget is below the District Tax Levy Limit or Cap. The proposed budget reflects a budget-to-budget increase of3.72% or a dollar value of $4,113,341. Given the anticipated revenues as referenced above of $18,024,924and an appropriation of Fund Balance in the amount of $2,890,871, the District projects an estimated tax levy of $ 93,630,998which represents a tax levy increase of $2,174,046 or 2.38%, which is below the District Tax Levy Limit or Cap calculated to be 248% for the 2014-2015 school year.

Fund Balance

Through extremely careful planning during the 2013-2014 school year, strategic exercising of cost saving efficiencies, and deferring various projects, it is anticipated that the District will be able to realize an authorized Fund Balance of four percent (4%). This Fund Balance is advantageous within the context of a conservative budget. Given the potential for emergencies and unexpected situations, maintaining a Fund Balance is quite important.

Tax Rates

It should be noted that the tax rates are determined by three independent factors: assessed valuation as determined by the assessor’s office, equalization rates as determined by the New York State Office or Real Property Services, and the tax levy as set by the school district.

It is important to note that there are still outstanding tax certiorari claims that have not been settled. Tax certiorari claims may enable taxpayers to reduce the assessments on their properties. Until such time as the tax rolls are set in August, the impact upon the final tax rate can not be determined.

The potential assessment value decreases will have an impact on the tax rate within the three towns of the Ossining School District. Equalization rate changes, determined by the New York State Office of Real Property Services [ORPS], also will affect apportionment of the school tax levy causing a potential shift in each share of the levy. We provide this information in order to promote greater understanding of the tax rate issues that are well beyond the control of the District.

1

1

5

At this time, we are projecting changes in the tax rates as follows:

Percentage Change in Tax Rate Change in Rate Per Assessed Value

Ossining 2.12% $8.80

New Castle 0.90% $.90

Yorktown: 1.13% $10.69

SUMMARY

As stated previously, our budgetary goal was to ensure that we maintain quality programs for the students we serve in the Ossining School District. We worked to address three areas: educational solvency, safety and space. Furthermore, we continue to support the following areas: academics, athletics, and cultural arts. Yet, the budget still remains below the Tax Levy Cap.

We encourage our community to stay informed throughout the process. Below are a few ways that you can stay connected:

In conclusion, we want to thank everyone who helped to develop the Board of Education Proposed Budget.

RS/nr

2-25-13 School Budget 2014-2015 Budget Memo to BOE 061

2

2

Ossining Union Free School District 2014-15 Budget

Table of Contents Page

1. Executive Summary – Letter from the Superintendent

2. Table of Contents 1

3. Statistical Information (Gold Section) A. 2014-15 General Fund Budget Pie Chart 2 B. 2013-14 General Fund Budget Pie Chart 3 C. Pupil Enrollment as of October of Each Year 4 D. Administrative Staff 5

4. Budget

A. Budget Summary 6 B. General Support (Pink Section) 7 C. Instructional (Blue Section) 26 D. Transportation (White Section) 69 E. Undistributed (Green Section) 73

5. Appendices

A. Administrative Salary Disclosure 2014-15 78 B. Administrators with Salaries over $128,000 79 C. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – Ossining 80 D. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – New Castle 81 E. Analysis of Assessed Valuations – Yorktown 82 F. Special Aid Fund Projects 2013 – 2014 83 G. Chapter 436 – Budget Presentation 84 H. Analysis of State Aid Received 85 I. 2014-15 Per Pupil Allocations 86 J. Preliminary Income Estimates 87 K. Determination of Estimated Tax Rate 88 L. Exemption Impact Report - Ossining 89 M. Exemption Impact Report – New Castle 91 N. Exemption Impact Report – Yorktown 92 O. Property Tax Report Card 93 P. The New York State District Report Card for 2012-13 94

1

3 .5 %

2 .3 %

3 .3 % 4 .4 % 5 .0 %

5 .2 %

2 5 .0 %

5 1 .3 %

IN S T R U C T IO N E M P L O YE E B E N E F IT S O P E R . & M A IN T E N A N C E

T R A N S P O R T A T IO N D E B T S E R V IC E /IN T E R F U N D A D M IN IS T R A T IO N

C E N T R A L S E R V IC E S N O N -P U B L IC S C H O O L S

$58.72 MILLION

$5.74 MILLION

$4.01 MILLION

$28.69 MILLION

$5.08 MILLION

$2.60 MILLION

$6.01MILLION

$3.7 MILLION

Employee Benefits

Operations & Maintenance

Instruction

Non-Public Schools

Central Services

Administration

Debt Service/Interfund

Transportation

2014-15 GENERAL FUND BUDGET

2

2013-14 GENERAL FUND BUDGET

3 .4 %

2 .2 %

3 .3 % 3 .6 % 4 .9 %

5 .0 %

2 5 .8 %

5 1 .8 %

IN S T R U C T IO N E M P L O YE E B E N E F IT S O P E R . & M A IN T E N A N C E

T R A N S P O R T A T IO N D E B T S E R V IC E /IN T E R F U N D A D M IN IS T R A T IO N

C E N T R A L S E R V IC E S N O N -P U B L IC S C H O O L S

$57.2 MILLION

$5.35 MILLION

$3.79 MILLION

$28.45 MILLION

$4.0 MILLION

$2.45 MILLION

$5.54 MILLION

$3.65 MILLION

Employee Benefits

Operations & Maintenance

Instruction

Non-Public Schools

Central Services

Administration

Debt Service/Interfund

Transportation

3

PRE-K KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY MIDDLEHIGH

SCHOOL TOTAL

OUT OF DISTRICT

PLACEMENTS

2004-05 214 288 1,477 865 1,313 4,157 44

2005-06 251 342 1,476 822 1,251 4,142 41

2006-07 270 323 1444 838 1,287 4,162 44

2007-08 283 342 1,478 829 1,307 4,239 44

2008-09 288 365 1,539 849 1,347 4,388 43

2009-10 276 355 1,588 861 1,370 4,450 38

2010-11 252 351 1,678 871 1,303 4,455 35

2011-12 248 382 1,721 916 1,335 4,602 36

2012-13 238 379 1,801 915 1,312 4,645 30

2013-14* 252 354 1,827 992 1,255 4,680 50

2014-15** 252 349 1,824 1,033 1,269 4,727 47

* Enrollment based on BEDS (Basic Educational Data System) Report dated October 2013 **Projected Enrollment

PUPIL ENROLLMENT AS OF OCTOBER OF EACH YEAR

2004-05 to 2014-15

4

2013-14 2014-15Central Administration

Superintendent of Schools 1.00 1.00Assistant Superintendent for Business 1.00 1.00Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction 1.00 1.00Total 3.00 3.00

School Administration

Elementary Principal 1.00 1.00Elementary Principal 1.00 1.00Elementary Principal 1.00 1.00Elementary Principal 1.00 1.00Middle School Principal 1.00 1.00High School Principal 1.00 1.00Elementary Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00Elementary Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00Middle School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00Middle School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00Middle School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00High School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00High School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00High School Assistant Principal 1.00 1.00Total 14.00 14.00

Program Administration

Director of Pupil Personnel Services 1.00 1.00Assistant Director of Pupil Personnel Services 1.00 1.00Director of Elementary School Literacy and ESL 1.00 1.00Director of Cultural Arts 1.00 1.00Director of Technology 1.00 1.00Assistant Director of Technology 1.00 1.00Director of Health, Physical Education and Athletics 1.00 1.00Total 7.00 7.00

Grand Total 24.00 24.00

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF

5

Appendix A

Administrative Salary Disclosure 2014 - 2015

Superintendent of Schools $232,000 Annual Salary

Breakdown of Annualized Cost of Benefits $ 40,670 - Mandatory TRS Contribution at 17.53% of annual salary $ 11,726 - Contribution to Health/Dental/Vision/Term Life/Workers’ Compensation/Disability Insurance $ 10,712 - Required: Social Security and Medicare

$ 63,108 Annualized Cost of Benefits Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction $179,671 Annual Salary

Breakdown of Annualized Cost of Benefits $ 31,496 - Mandatory TRS Contribution at 17.53% of annual salary

$ 22,260 - Contribution to Health/Dental/Vision/Term Life/Workers’ Compensation/Disability Insurance $ 9,859 - Required: Social Security and Medicare $ 63,615 Annualized Cost of Benefits Assistant Superintendent for Business $198,429 Annual Salary Breakdown of Annualized Cost of Benefits $ 34,785 - Mandatory TRS Contribution at 17.53% of annual salary $ 22,869 - Contribution to Health/Dental/Vision/Term Life/Workers’ Compensation/Disability Insurance $ 10,131 - Required: Social Security and Medicare

$ 67,785 Annualized Cost of Benefits

78

Appendix B

The following information is presented as required by Chapter 474 of the Laws of 1996,

the State of New York.

School Administration

Principal $152,307

Principal $155,184

Principal $158,463

Principal $171,922

Principal $184,656

Principal $197,391

Elementary Assistant Principal $154,268

High School Assistant Principal $159,186



Program Administration

Director of Cultural Arts $141,016

Assistant Director of Technology $146,192

Director of School Facilities, Operations and Maintenance $137,330

Director of Technology $159,896

Director of Pupil Personnel Services $171,922

Director of Elementary Literacy and ESL $171,922

Director of Health, Physical Education and Athletics $171,922

ADMINISTRATORS WITH SALARIES OVER $128,000

2014 ‐ 2015

79

Appendix C

ASSESSED TOTAL SCHOOL TAX

YEAR VALUATION BUDGET RATE

AMOUNT PERCENTAGE AMOUNT PERCENTAGE AMOUNT PERCENTAGE

2004-05 191,897,569 1,210,547 0.63% 77,070,589 5,746,052 8.86% 293.66 24.58 9.13%

2005-06 194,637,934 2,740,365 1.43% 83,915,126 6,844,537 8.88% 319.00 25.34 8.63%

2006-07 194,729,767 91,833 0.05% 90,425,294 6,510,168 7.76% 334.16 15.16 4.75%

2007-08 196,403,010 1,673,243 0.86% 95,979,505 5,554,211 6.14% 353.16 19.00 5.69%

2008-09 196,286,589 (116,421) -0.06% 100,389,446 4,409,941 4.59% 364.62 11.46 3.24%

2009-10 196,755,754 469,165 0.24% 100,832,030 442,584 0.44% 364.83 0.21 0.06%

2010-11 196,023,596 (732,158) -0.37% 101,780,654 948,624 0.94% 376.78 11.95 3.28%

2011-12 196,945,330 921,734 0.47% 103,502,510 1,721,856 1.69% 381.67 4.89 1.30%

2012-13 194,420,462 (2,524,868) -1.28% 106,588,570 3,086,060 2.98% 431.63 49.96 13.09%

2013-14 192,958,634 (1,461,828) -0.75% 110,433,452 3,844,882 3.61% 413.94 -17.69 -4.10%

CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET CHANGE IN TAX RATE

ANALYSIS OF ASSESSED VALUATIONS, SCHOOL BUDGETS AND SCHOOL TAX RATES

OSSINING

80

ASSESSED TOTAL SCHOOL TAX YEAR VALUATION BUDGET RATE


2004-05 76,296,095 (95,998) -0.13% 77,070,589 6,448,743 9.13% 90.24 2.38 2.71%

2005-06 75,967,068 (329,027) -0.43% 83,915,126 6,844,537 8.88% 93.51 3.27 3.63%

2006-07 75,910,306 (56,762) -0.07% 90,425,294 6,510,168 7.76% 102.33 8.82 9.43%

2007-08 75,276,416 (633,890) -0.84% 95,979,505 5,554,211 6.14% 97.26 -5.07 -4.95%

2008-09 74,602,589 (673,827) -0.90% 100,389,446 4,409,941 4.59% 107.50 10.24 10.53%

2009-10 75,272,388 669,799 0.90% 100,832,030 442,584 0.44% 108.37 0.87 0.81%

2010-11 72,415,553 (2,856,835) -3.80% 101,780,654 948,624 0.94% 115.16 6.79 6.27%

2011-12 71,720,339 (695,214) -0.96% 103,502,510 1,721,856 1.69% 114.89 -0.27 -0.23%

2012-13 70,536,680 (1,183,659) -1.65% 106,588,570 3,086,060 2.98% 125.93 11.04 9.61%

2013-14 69,976,409 (560,271) -0.79% 110,433,452 3,844,882 3.61% 125.37 -0.56 -0.44%

CHANGE IN TAX RATE

Appendix D


CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET

NEW CASTLE

CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION

81

Appendix E

ASSESSED TOTAL SCHOOL TAX

YEAR VALUATION BUDGET RATE


2004-05 1,401,220 32,491 2.37% 77,070,589 6,449,743 9.13% 811.81 162.76 25.08%

2005-06 1,474,123 72,903 5.20% 83,915,126 6,844,537 8.88% 803.98 -7.83 -0.96%

2006-07 1,551,068 76,945 5.22% 90,425,294 6,510,168 7.76% 821.62 17.64 2.19%

2007-08 1,605,849 54,781 3.53% 95,979,505 5,554,211 6.14% 866.97 45.35 5.52%

2008-09 1,611,891 6,042 0.38% 100,389,446 4,409,941 4.59% 897.63 30.66 3.54%

2009-10 1,634,448 22,557 1.40% 100,832,030 442,584 0.44% 877.30 -20.33 -2.26%

2010-11 2,964,341 1,329,893 81.37% 101,780,654 948,624 0.94% 913.41 36.11 4.12%

2011-12 2,972,777 8,436 0.28% 103,502,510 1,721,856 1.69% 852.22 -61.19 -6.70%

2012-13 2,972,879 102 0.00% 106,588,570 3,086,060 2.98% 974.89 122.67 14.39%

2013-14 2,963,255 (9,624) -0.32% 110,433,452 3,844,882 3.61% 949.24 -25.65 -2.63%


YORKTOWN

CHANGE IN TOTAL BUDGET CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUATION CHANGE IN TAX RATE

82

Appendix F

Project Name Salaries Equipment Other Supplies Fringe Indirect Grand Total

IDEA, Part B Section 611 662,900 0 199,648 24,467 275,446 1,207 1,163,668

IDEA, Part B Section 619 13,125 0 18,566 0 0 0 31,691

Title I A&D 455,239 0 44,930 20,989 49,418 0 570,576

Title II Part A 135,924 0 3,729 0 0 0 139,653

Title III, LEP 80,204 0 0 0 0 0 80,204

Bank Street Teacher Leadership Program 28,759 0 0 0 7,241 0 36,000

Strengthening Teacher Leader Effectiveness 57,321 0 198,357 3,435 13,700 6,598 279,411

Strengthening Teacher Leader Effectiveness II 85,168 0 17,500 2,089 36,743 3,679 145,179

McKinney-Vento Education of Homeless 15,068 0 17,694 400 3,638 0 36,800

Pre-Kindergarten Program 760,378 0 103,619 4,000 341,589 0 1,209,586

Response to Intervention 123,953 0 4,000 0 0 0 127,953

First Steps 218,546 0 1,676 1,624 82,091 0 303,937

Ossining Matters 17,939 19,850 68,868 11,181 4,522 0 122,360

Parent Leadership Project 40,359 0 11,150 225 15,726 0 67,460

Fund for the Improvement of Education 8,736 0 2,234 502 2,383 0 13,855

Race to the Top 10,024 0 27,239 1,000 0 0 38,263

Teacher Centers 22,900 0 500 108 3,702 707 27,917

Total 2,736,543 19,850 719,710 70,020 836,199 12,191 4,394,513

Includes new funding in the current school year.

Excludes all non-federal, non-state grants with new funding less than $25k.

Excludes Extended School Year, Teachers Center (funds raised via charges), Summer Handicap

SPECIAL AID FUND PROJECTS 2013 - 2014

Excludes carry over funds with the exception of Ossining Matters programs funded in 12/13 for the 13/14 Fiscal Year, and PLP and First Steps.

83

APPENDIX G

Code Description

Administrative Program Capital Administrative Program Capital

1010 Board of Education 37,449 0 0 39,988 0 0

1040 Office of District Clerk 70,095 0 0 72,531 0 0

1060 District Meetings 26,770 0 0 28,260 0 0

1240 Office of Chief School Administrator 351,396 0 0 351,915 0 0

1310 Business Administration 955,153 0 0 964,054 0 0

1320 Auditing 62,060 0 0 61,040 0 0

1325 Treasurer 14,733 0 0 13,985 0 0

1420 Legal 30,900 243,180 0 57,780 262,220 0

1430 Human Resources 314,362 0 0 395,101 0 0

1460 Records Management 40,504 0 0 47,295 0 0

1480 Office of Public Information 129,787 0 0 125,802 0 0

1620 Operations & Maintenance 0 0 5,539,460 0 0 6,011,271

1680 Central Data Processing 814,762 0 0 851,026 0 0

1999 Undistributed Expenses 725,633 198,804 184,459 760,406 222,750 188,610

2010 Curriculum Development and Supervision 295,749 614 0 504,631 42,300 0

2020 Building Administration 3,414,452 127,212 0 3,447,455 138,907 0

2022 Director of Physical Education 297,492 3,500 0 237,835 4,500 0

2024 Director of Cultural Arts 175,569 4,000 0 157,466 12,200 0

2060 Research and Evaluation 403,833 0 0 433,580 0 0

2070 In-Service Training 0 221,451 0 0 413,265 0

2110 Instruction-Regular School 0 32,149,679 0 0 32,949,039 0

2111 GO-TV and WOSS-FM 0 91,511 0 0 94,813 0

2112 Textbooks - Other 0 33,280 0 0 29,695 0

2250 Special Education - Instructional 0 6,742,036 0 0 6,942,738 0

2251 Director of Pupil Personnel Services 0 1,066,657 0 0 968,925 0

2252 Special Ed - Tuition & Related Services 0 3,353,860 0 0 3,121,888 0

2253 Special Ed - Speech & Language 0 957,180 0 0 1,018,627 0

2254 Special Ed - BOCES Placements 0 1,941,300 0 0 1,935,000 0

2255 Special Ed - Resource Ed/Consultant 0 668,315 0 0 630,606 0

2280 BOCES - Occupational Education 0 1,623,367 0 0 1,434,893 0

2330 Extended Day/Year and Community Support 0 65,928 0 0 63,328 0

2331 Academic Intervention Services 0 123,938 0 0 161,183 0

2332 Enrichment 0 149,446 0 0 145,703 0

2610 Library - Salaries & Equipment 0 485,409 0 0 589,876 0

2630 Instructional Technology 0 2,115,264 0 0 2,174,131 0

2805 Attendance 0 280,016 0 0 284,371 0

2810 Guidance Department 0 1,000,279 0 0 1,072,316 0

2815 Health Services 0 1,043,835 0 0 1,113,255 0

2820 Psychological Services 0 476,212 0 0 494,946 0

2825 Social Worker 0 286,495 0 0 317,445 0

2850 Co-Curricular Activities 0 200,809 0 0 217,897 0

2855 Interscholastic Athletics 0 675,540 0 0 732,565 0

5510 Transportation 0 601,766 0 0 637,734 0

5540 Contract Transportation 0 6,452,595 0 0 6,748,524 0

8060 Community Learning Center 0 0 0 0 15,000 0

9000 Employee Benefits 3,281,797 23,414,137 1,869,297 3,156,447 23,956,325 1,673,768

9500 Transfer to Capital Funds 0 0 661,000 0 0 1,425,000

9700 Debt Service 0 0 3,338,422 0 0 3,653,855

9900 Transfer to Other Funds 38,205 562,497 0 58,875 881,852 0

Totals 11,480,701 87,360,112 11,592,638 11,765,472 89,828,817 12,952,504

Percentage of Total Budget 10.4% 79.1% 10.5% 10.3% 78.4% 11.3%

Total Budget 110,433,452 114,546,793

CHAPTER 436 - BUDGET PRESENTATION

OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT

2013-2014 Budget 2014-2015 Proposed Budget

84

Appendix H

ANALYSIS OF STATE AID RECEIVED

FISCAL YEAR SCHOOL BUDGET AID RECEIVED TOTAL BUDGET

2003 - 04 70,621,846 7,971,467 11.29%

2004 - 05 77,070,589 7,712,012 10.01%

2005 - 06 84,093,637 8,856,858 10.53%

2006 - 07 91,546,532 10,262,411 11.21%

2007 - 08 95,979,505 11,589,479 12.07%

2008 - 09 100,389,446 13,506,141 13.45%

(1) 2009 - 10 100,832,030 13,657,847 13.55%

(2) 2010 - 11 101,780,654 12,944,529 12.72%

2011 - 12 103,502,510 12,873,431 12.44%

(3) 2012 - 13 106,588,570 13,067,639 12.26%

(4) 2013 - 14 110,433,452 12,886,648 11.67%

(1) Note: 2009 - 10 State Aid includes Federal Economic Stimulus Funding of $1,852,223

(2) Note: 2010 - 11 State Aid includes Federal Economic Stimulus Funding of $855,550

(3) Note: 2012 - 13 State Aid includes Federal Medicaid Aid of $20,695

(4) Note: Estimated 2013-14 State Aid is subject to change as of 2-18-2013

85

APPENDIX J

2013-14 2013-14 2014-2015BUDGETED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED

ACCOUNT NO. ACCOUNT TITLE AMOUNT RECEIPTS AMOUNT

1081 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 70,000 70,000 73,0001120 Nonproperty Tax Distribution by County 1,500,000 1,682,745 1,700,0001330 Textbook Charges from Individuals - 2,006 0

1335 Other Student Fee/Charges - 30,937 02230 Day School Tuition Other Districts 265,000 369,848 245,0002280 Health Services for Other Districts 160,000 159,838 160,0002401 Interest and Earning - G.F. 100,000 104,688 100,0002410 Rental of Real Property 0 0 02450 Commissions 0 0 02620 Forfeiture of Deposits 0 4,575 02665 Sale of Property - 3,389 02690 Other Compensation for Loss - 41,707 02701 Refund of Prior Year Expenditures 430,000 620,927 500,0002705 Gifts and Donations 0 9,971 02730 MTA Payroll Tax 0 0 02770 Other Unclassified Revenue 40,000 52,744 55,0002771 Reimbursement Medicare Part D 0 19,184 03101 State Aid - Basic Formula* 10,891,332 10,978,074 11,974,9513103 State Aid - BOCES 2,115,208 1,497,786 2,484,7373104 State Aid - Tuition for Students with Disabilities 0 35,696 03260 State Aid - Textbook & Library 289,922 270,778 298,3133262 State Aid - Software Materials 76,937 76,937 73,3873263 State Aid - Library Materials 32,100 32,100 30,6193289 State Aid - Other 250,000 631,083 250,0004601 Medicaid Assistance 15,000 58,959 25,0005050 Interfund Transfer - Debt Service 100,000 100,000 54,9175051 Interfund Transfer - Capital 90,000 90,000 0

SUB TOTALS 16,425,500 16,943,973 18,024,924

APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: 2,051,000 2,000,000APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: CLOSE OUT HEALTH DESIGNATION 485,465 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: CLOSE OUT DISABILITY DESIGNATION 287,264 APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE: CLOSE OUT OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 118,142 APPROPRIATION OF ERS RESERVE: 500,000

TOTAL ESTIMATED INCOME AVAILABLE 18,976,500 16,943,973 20,915,795

REVENUE 2014-15

PRELIMINARY INCOME ESTIMATES

Note: *Building Aid on Capital Bond Projects will increase by approximately $538,000 from 2013-14 to 2014-15. This revenue increase offsets the Debt Service expense increase of approximately $316,000 on page 77 resulting in no increases to the tax levy. In fact, there is additional Building Aid revenue of approzimately $222,000.

87

APPENDIX K

2013-14 2014-2015 CHANGE $ CHANGE %

GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS AND PLANNED BUDGET 110,433,452 114,546,793 4,113,341 3.72%LESS: ESTIMATED REVENUES OTHER THAN REAL PROPERTY TAXES 18,976,499 20,915,795 1,939,296 TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXATION 91,456,953 93,630,998 2,174,045 2.38%

CHANGE CHANGETOWN 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 2013-14 2014-2015 $ %

OSSINING 192,958,634 193,585,490 6.10% 6.29% 3,163,256,295 3,077,670,747 87.3319% 87.4014% 79,871,136 81,834,785 413.928802 422.732018 8.80 2.13%NEW CASTLE 69,976,409 70,042,945 20.14% 21.02% 347,449,896 333,220,480 9.5925% 9.4630% 8,772,991 8,860,281 125.370690 126.497830 1.13 0.90%YORKTOWN 2,963,255 3,058,511 2.66% 2.77% 111,400,564 110,415,560 3.0756% 3.1356% 2,812,826 2,935,932 949.235224 959.922165 10.69 1.13%TOTAL 265,898,298 266,686,946 3,622,106,755 3,521,306,787 100.0000% 100.0000% 91,456,953 93,630,998

NOTE: THE TAX RATE IS AN ESTIMATED AMOUNT PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLLS BEING FINALIZED BY OSSINING, YORKTOWN AND NEW CASTLE. THE ASSESSOR'S ARE IN THE PROCESS OF SETTLING TAX CERTIORARI'S, WHICH CAN FURTHER REDUCE ASSESSMENTS.

IN RECENT YEARS THE RESIDENTS OF NEW CASTLE HAVE PETITIONED THE OFFICE OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES FOR A SEGMENT SPECIAL EQUALIZATION RATE. IF A SEGMENT SPECIAL EQUALIZATION RATE IS APPROVED THE TAX RATES WILL BE IMPACTED.

2014-15 BUDGETDETERMINATION OF ESTIMATED TAX RATE

FOR THE OSSINING SCHOOL DISTRICT

PRELIM. EST. TAXDOLLAR SHARE OF RATE PER $1,000 OF

ASSESSED VALUATION EQUALIZATION RATE FULL VALUE PERCENT OF TOTAL TAX LEVY ASSESSED VALUE

88

Appendix O

661401 - OSSINING UFSD

Contact Person: Ms. Alita Zuber Budgeted Proposed Budget * Percent

Telephone Number: (914) 941 - 7700 2013-14 2014-15 Change

(A) (B) (C)

110,433,452 114,546,793 3.72%

91,456,952 93,630,998 2.38%

4,225,843 3,765,785

87,231,109 89,865,213

87,372,849 89,963,022

-141,740 -97,809

4,583 4,631 1.05%

1.46%

Actual Estimated

2013-14 2014-15

(D) (E)

17,350,885 16,761,180

2,551,000 2,890,871

4,403,747 4,581,872

3.99% 4.00%

* Voter approval of this budget authorizes the District to enter into a ten year lease agreement for building space within the Ossining Union Free School District as well as the cost of making alterations to make it a suitable office space.

Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance as a Percent of the Total Budget

Total Proposed Spending

Proposed School Year Tax Levy, Not Including Levy for Permissible Exclusions or Levy to Support Library Debt

Adjusted Restricted Fund Balance

Consumer Price Index

Difference (positive value requires 60.0% voter approval)

Adjusted Unrestricted Fund Balance

Permissible Exclusions to the School Tax Levy Limit

2014-15 Property Tax Report Card

Total Proposed School Year Tax Levy, Including Tax Levy to Support Library Debt 1

Assigned Appropriated Fund Balance

Public School Enrollment

School Tax Levy Limit , Not Including Levy for Permissible Exclusions 2

1 All proposed levies should exclude any prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.

2 For 2014-15, includes any carryover from 2013-14 and excludes any tax levy for library debt or prior year reserve for excess tax levy, including interest.

93

Appendix P

The New York State

District Report Card

for 2012-13

94

4/30/2014 2013 | OSSINING UFSD - Report Card | New York State Education Department Data Site

http://data.nysed.gov/reportcard.php?instid=800000035059&year=2013&createreport=1&enrollment=1&avgclasssize=1&freelunch=1&attendance=1&teacherqu… 1/52

The New York State School Report Card [2012 - 13]NAME: OSSINING UFSD

BEDS Code: 661401030000

SUPERINTENDENT : Raymond Sanchez

ADDRESS: 190 CROTON AVE, OSSINING, NY 10562

PHONE: (914) 941-7700

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raiselearning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/districtenrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and districtperformance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths andweaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.

95



OSSINING UFSD Enrollment (2012 - 13) K-12 Enrollment: 4,416

These enrollment data are collected as part of NYSED's Student Information Repository System (SIRS). These counts are as of "BEDS Day"

which is typically the first Wednesday in October. Available are enrollment counts for public and charter school students by various

demographics for the 2012 - 13 school year. For nonpublic school enrollment data please see the Non-Public School Enrollment and Staff

information on our Information and Reporting Services webpage

Students by Gender

Male

2,289 52%

Female

2,127 48%

Students by Ethnicity

American Indianor Alaska Native

1

0%

Black or AfricanAmerican

560

13%

Hispanic orLatino

2,265

51%

Asian or NativeHawaiian/OtherPacific Islander

222

5%

White

1,283

29%

Multiracial

85

2%

Other Groups

Limited English ProficientStudents

475 11%

Students with Disabilities

543 12%

Economically DisadvantagedStudents

1,987 45%

Students by Grade

Pre-K(Half Day)

237

Kindergarten(Full Day)

374

1st Grade

379

2nd Grade

361

3rd Grade

353

4th Grade

350

5th Grade

343

6th Grade

304

UngradedElementary

21

7th Grade

322

8th Grade

286

9th Grade

327

10th Grade

302

11th Grade

319

12th Grade

350

UngradedSecondary

25

96

http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/statistics/nonpublic/home.html



Average Class Size (2012 - 13)

Common Branch

25

Grade 8 English

26

Grade 8 Mathematics

27

Grade 8 Science

21

Grade 8 Social Studies

27

Grade 10 English

23

Grade 10 Mathematics

17

Grade 10 Science

21

Grade 10 Social Studies

22

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2012 - 13)

Eligible for Free Lunch Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

1,219 28% 422 10%

Attendance and Suspensions (2011 - 12)

Annual Attendance Rate Student Suspensions

96% 106 3%

Teacher Turnover Rate (2011 - 12)

Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of ExperienceTurnover Rate of All Teachers

15% 9%

Teacher Qualifications (2010-11 through 2012-13)

2010 - 11 2011 - 12 2012 - 13

Total Number of Teachers 335 324 325

Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate 0% 0% 0%

Percent Teaching Out of Certification 0% 1% 0%

Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience 3% 2% 2%

Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate 62% 67% 69%

Total Number of Core Classes 817 776 703

Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District 0% 0% 0%

Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Statewide 2% 2% 3%

Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in High-PovertySchools Statewide 5% 4% 6%

Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in Low-Poverty0% 1% 1%97



Schools Statewide

Total Number of Classes 1,071 1,068 972

Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification 0% 1% 0%

98



High School Completers (2012 - 13)

Results by Student Group

Completers(Graduates + IEP

Diplomas)

Graduates(Regents + Local

Diplomas)Regents Diploma

Regents with AdvancedDesignation

Number ofStudents

Number ofStudents

Number ofStudents

Percent ofGraduates

Number ofStudents

Percent ofGraduates

All Students 291 287 273 95% 113 39%

General Education 265 265 260 98% 113 43%

Students with Disabilities 26 22 13 59% 0 0%


Regents with CTE Endorsement Local DiplomasIndividualized EducationProgram (IEP) Diplomas

Number ofStudents

Percent ofGraduates

Number ofStudents

Percent ofGraduates

Number ofStudents

Percent ofCompleters

All Students 0 0% 14 5% 4 1%

General Education 0 0% 5 2% 0 0%

Students with Disabilities 0 0% 9 41% 4 15%

99



High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)


Dropped OutEntered Approved High School

Equivalency Preparation Program Total Noncompleters

Number ofStudents

Percent ofStudents

Number ofStudents

Percent ofStudents

Number ofStudents

Percent ofStudents

All Students 16 1% 32 2% 48 4%

General Education 15 1% 24 2% 39 3%

Students with Disabilities 1 1% 8 4% 9 5%

100



Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)

Results by Student Group To Four-Year College To Two-Year CollegeTo Other Post-

Secondary To the Military

Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


All Students 172 59% 88 30% 4 1% 5 2%

General Education 167 63% 78 29% 2 1% 5 2%

Students with Disabilities 5 19% 10 38% 2 8% 0 0%

Results by Student Group To Employment To Adult Services To Other Known Plans Plan Unknown

Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


All Students 15 5% 3 1% 3 1% 1 0%

General Education 11 4% 0 0% 1 0% 1 0%

Students with Disabilities 4 15% 3 12% 2 8% 0 0%

101



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

40%40%40%

33%33%33%

26%26%26%

1%1%1%

28%28%28%

9%

26%26%26%

53%53%53%

12%12%12%

64%64%64%

36%36%36%33%33%33%

27%27%27%

4%

31%31%31%

14%14%14%

31%31%31%

49%49%49%

7%

56%56%56%

Percentage Scoring at LevelsMean Score

Grade 3 English Language Arts

2013

295

2012

668

Results by Student Group 2013 2012

TotalTested

Percent Scoring at Level(s)

1 2 3 4

%Proficient(Levels3 and 4)

TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 349 40 33 26 1 28 346 9 26 53 12 64

General Education 307 33 36 29 2 31 312 4 27 56 13 69

Students with Disabilities 42 90 7 2 0 2 34 56 24 18 3 21

American Indian or Alaska Native 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 21 29 19 48 5 52 16 _ _ _ _ _

Black or African American 33 55 21 21 3 24 44 11 30 50 9 59

Hispanic or Latino 191 48 38 14 0 14 190 12 35 48 5 53

White 98 22 30 45 3 48 93 4 11 59 26 85

Multiracial 5 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _

Small Group Total 6 17 33 50 0 50 19 0 11 68 21 89

Female 165 36 30 33 1 34 167 5 28 56 11 68

Male 184 43 35 20 2 22 179 13 25 49 12 61

English Proficient 287 32 34 32 2 33 308 8 21 57 13 71

Limited English Proficient 62 76 24 0 0 0 38 21 66 13 0 13

Economically Disadvantaged 167 52 34 13 1 14 182 14 37 45 4 49

Not Economically Disadvantaged 182 29 32 38 2 40 164 4 14 62 20 82

Migrant 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 348 _ _ _ _ _ 346 9 26 53 12 64

102



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

30%30%30%

42%42%42%

23%23%23%

5%

28%28%28%

12%12%12%

34%34%34%

51%51%51%

3%

55%55%55%

30%30%30%

39%39%39%

21%21%21%

9%

30%30%30%

9%

31%31%31%

55%55%55%

5%

59%59%59%



2013

298

2012

671


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 352 30 42 23 5 28 339 12 34 51 3 55



Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 17 6 47 18 29 47 22 9 14 59 18 77



White 95 9 41 40 9 49 103 5 18 71 6 77

Multiracial 5 0 40 20 40 60 6 0 17 83 0 83

Female 171 25 46 23 6 29 182 8 32 56 3 59

Male 181 36 38 23 3 26 157 15 36 46 3 49





Not Migrant 352 30 42 23 5 28 339 12 34 51 3 55

103


http://data.nysed.gov/reportcard.php?instid=800000035059&year=2013&createreport=1&enrollment=1&avgclasssize=1&freelunch=1&attendance=1&teacherq… 10/52

District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

37%37%37% 38%38%38%

20%20%20%

4%

24%24%24%

12%12%12%

34%34%34%

49%49%49%

5%

54%54%54%

34%34%34%36%36%36%

22%22%22%

9%

30%30%30%

11%11%11%

32%32%32%

53%53%53%

5%

58%58%58%



2013

296

2012

670


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 343 37 38 20 4 24 300 12 34 49 5 54






White 100 19 41 31 9 40 86 3 15 69 13 81

Multiracial 8 25 50 25 0 25 2 _ _ _ _ _


Female 179 34 41 20 6 25 143 10 30 53 6 59

Male 164 41 35 21 3 24 157 13 37 45 4 50





Not Migrant 343 37 38 20 4 24 300 12 34 49 5 54

104



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

31%31%31%

41%41%41%

14%14%14% 13%13%13%

27%27%27%

16%16%16%

32%32%32%

47%47%47%

5%

52%52%52%

29%29%29%

42%42%42%

16%16%16%14%14%14%

30%30%30%

11%11%11%

34%34%34%

53%53%53%

2%2%2%

56%56%56%



2013

297

2012

663


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 299 31 41 14 13 27 319 16 32 47 5 52



Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 10 _ _ _ _ _ 13 _ _ _ _ _



White 82 12 30 29 28 57 106 8 24 62 7 69

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 143 26 41 15 17 33 149 11 29 54 6 60

Male 156 37 41 13 10 22 170 20 35 42 4 45





Not Migrant 299 31 41 14 13 27 319 16 32 47 5 52

105



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

39%39%39% 39%39%39%

17%17%17%

5%

22%22%22%

7%

37%37%37%

52%52%52%

3%

55%55%55%

32%32%32%

37%37%37%

23%23%23%

8%

31%31%31%

8%

39%39%39%

49%49%49%

4%

52%52%52%



2013

293

2012

665


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 321 39 39 17 5 22 284 7 37 52 3 55






White 103 28 35 25 12 37 82 4 23 67 6 73

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _


Female 149 30 40 25 5 30 133 7 34 55 5 59

Male 172 46 38 10 5 16 151 8 40 50 2 52





Not Migrant 321 39 39 17 5 22 284 7 37 52 3 55

106



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

26%26%26%

42%42%42%

25%25%25%

7%

32%32%32%

5%

39%39%39%

54%54%54%

1%1%1%

56%56%56%

30%30%30%

37%37%37%

23%23%23%

10%10%10%

34%34%34%

7%

42%42%42%

48%48%48%

2%2%2%

50%50%50%



2013

300

2012

661


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 286 26 42 25 7 32 304 5 39 54 1 56






White 85 14 38 34 14 48 103 2 24 71 3 74

Multiracial 5 0 100 0 0 0 1 _ _ _ _ _


Female 133 24 39 26 11 37 138 4 34 59 3 62

Male 153 27 44 24 5 28 166 7 43 50 0 50





Not Migrant 286 26 42 25 7 32 304 5 39 54 1 56

107



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

31%31%31%

37%37%37%

23%23%23%

9%

33%33%33%

8%

29%29%29%

50%50%50%

13%13%13%

63%63%63%

30%30%30%

35%35%35%

22%22%22%

12%12%12%

34%34%34%

9%

30%30%30%

48%48%48%

13%13%13%

61%61%61%


Grade 3 Mathematics

2013

298

2012

688


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 349 31 37 23 9 33 348 8 29 50 13 63



American Indian or Alaska Native 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0




White 96 18 29 35 18 53 93 3 15 58 24 82

Multiracial 5 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 165 28 36 27 9 36 168 5 31 54 11 64

Male 184 33 37 21 9 30 180 11 27 47 15 62





Migrant 1 _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 348 _ _ _ _ _ 348 8 29 50 13 63

108



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

33%33%33%

39%39%39%

19%19%19%

9%

28%28%28%

7%

29%29%29%

39%39%39%

25%25%25%

63%63%63%

29%29%29%

35%35%35%

23%23%23%

13%13%13%

36%36%36%

5%

25%25%25%

39%39%39%

30%30%30%

69%69%69%


Grade 4 Mathematics

2013

294

2012

685


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 358 33 39 19 9 28 346 7 29 39 25 63






White 97 18 37 31 14 45 104 6 15 38 40 79

Multiracial 5 20 40 20 20 40 6 0 17 50 33 83

Female 176 34 44 18 5 23 184 8 27 40 24 65

Male 182 32 35 21 12 33 162 6 32 37 25 62





Not Migrant 358 33 39 19 9 28 346 7 29 39 25 63

109



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

45%45%45%

31%31%31%

16%16%16%

8%

24%24%24%

7%

29%29%29%32%32%32% 32%32%32%

64%64%64%

40%40%40%

30%30%30%

21%21%21%

9%

30%30%30%

7%

26%26%26%

38%38%38%

28%28%28%

67%67%67%


Grade 5 Mathematics

2013

297

2012

690


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 347 45 31 16 8 24 298 7 29 32 32 64






White 101 28 36 21 16 37 86 3 16 21 59 80

Multiracial 8 25 38 25 13 38 2 _ _ _ _ _


Female 182 45 33 13 9 22 141 4 28 38 30 67

Male 165 44 30 18 8 26 157 10 30 26 34 61





Not Migrant 347 45 31 16 8 24 298 7 29 32 32 64

110



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

39%39%39%

32%32%32%

17%17%17%

11%11%11%

28%28%28%

10%10%10%

33%33%33%

27%27%27% 29%29%29%

57%57%57%

29%29%29%

41%41%41%

18%18%18%

12%12%12%

31%31%31%

8%

27%27%27%

35%35%35%31%31%31%

65%65%65%


Grade 6 Mathematics

2013

295

2012

678


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 303 39 32 17 11 28 321 10 33 27 29 57






White 81 21 26 30 23 53 106 7 21 28 44 73

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 146 40 30 17 12 29 149 9 35 28 28 56

Male 157 38 34 18 10 27 172 11 31 27 30 58





Not Migrant 303 39 32 17 11 28 321 10 33 27 29 57

111



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

42%42%42%

29%29%29%

23%23%23%

6%

29%29%29%

10%10%10%

28%28%28%32%32%32% 30%30%30%

62%62%62%

38%38%38%34%34%34%

20%20%20%

7%

28%28%28%

9%

26%26%26%

34%34%34%31%31%31%

65%65%65%


Grade 7 Mathematics

2013

298

2012

676


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 326 42 29 23 6 29 284 10 28 32 30 62






White 103 24 31 36 9 45 82 2 16 30 51 82

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _


Female 151 42 27 27 4 31 133 11 26 35 29 64

Male 175 42 31 19 8 27 151 9 30 30 30 60





Not Migrant 326 42 29 23 6 29 284 10 28 32 30 62

112



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

37%37%37%

48%48%48%

11%11%11%

5%

16%16%16%

6%

33%33%33%

48%48%48%

13%13%13%

61%61%61%

31%31%31%

41%41%41%

20%20%20%

7%

28%28%28%

7%

31%31%31%

42%42%42%

20%20%20%

61%61%61%


Grade 8 Mathematics

2013

293

2012

676


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 288 37 48 11 5 16 307 6 33 48 13 61






White 82 22 49 22 7 29 103 1 22 51 25 77

Multiracial 5 60 40 0 0 0 1 _ _ _ _ _


Female 134 33 51 11 4 16 139 6 29 49 16 65

Male 154 40 44 11 5 16 168 7 36 47 10 57





Not Migrant 288 37 48 11 5 16 307 6 33 48 13 61

113



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

3%3%3%

5%

32%32%32%

60%60%60%

92%92%92%

3%3%3%

13%13%13%

37%37%37%

47%47%47%

84%84%84%

2%2%2%8%

33%33%33%

57%57%57%

90%90%90%

3%3%3%9%

32%32%32%

57%57%57%

89%89%89%


Grade 4 Science

2013

83

2012

80


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 354 3 5 32 60 92 344 3 13 37 47 84






White 95 1 2 13 84 97 103 1 6 15 79 93

Multiracial 5 0 0 20 80 100 6 0 0 50 50 100

Female 175 3 1 35 61 96 183 3 14 36 47 83

Male 179 3 9 29 59 88 161 4 12 38 47 84





Not Migrant 354 3 5 32 60 92 344 3 13 37 47 84

114



District: 2013

District: 2012

Statewide: 2013

Statewide: 2012

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

10%10%10% 11%11%11%

48%48%48%

31%31%31%

79%79%79%

9% 8%

46%46%46%

38%38%38%

84%84%84%

6%

21%21%21%

43%43%43%

30%30%30%

73%73%73%

7%

20%20%20%

42%42%42%

30%30%30%

73%73%73%

Percentage Scoring at Levels

Mean Score

Grade 8 ScienceData in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students w ho took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students w ho took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean

scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students w ho took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

2013

51

2012

54


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 9 33 22 44 0 44 12 33 33 33 0 33

General Education 5 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _

Students with Disabilities 4 _ _ _ _ _ 8 _ _ _ _ _

Black or African American 4 _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _

Hispanic or Latino 4 _ _ _ _ _ 6 33 33 33 0 33

White 1 _ _ _ _ _ 2 _ _ _ _ _


Female 1 _ _ _ _ _ 5 20 40 40 0 40

Male 8 _ _ _ _ _ 7 43 29 29 0 29

English Proficient 6 _ _ _ _ _ 9 _ _ _ _ _

Limited English Proficient 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _

Economically Disadvantaged 4 _ _ _ _ _ 7 43 43 14 0 14

Not Economically Disadvantaged 5 _ _ _ _ _ 5 20 20 60 0 60

Not Migrant 9 33 22 44 0 44 12 33 33 33 0 33

115



Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test

Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


TotalTested


1 2 3 4


All Students 281 9 10 48 32 80 292 8 7 46 40 86

116



Recently Arrived LEP Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP: Grade 3

2013

3

2012

2

Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 3

2013

3

2012

2


2013

6

2012

4


2013

6

2012

4


2013

3

2012

1


2013

3

2012

1


2013

5

2012

2


2013

5

2012

2




2013

4

2012

0


2013

4

2012

0


2013

5

2012

3


2013

6

2012

2

118



Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP(2012 - 13)

NAEP Grade 4 Reading

% Below Basic % Basic % Proficient % Advanced

All Students 30 33 28 9

American Indian or Alaska Native * * * *

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 19 27 36 18

Black or African American 45 34 18 3

Hispanic or Latino 44 35 17 4

White 20 33 35 12

Multiracial * * * *

Students with Disabilities 69 22 7 2

Limited English Proficient 75 21 4 *

Economically Disadvantaged 43 34 19 4

NAEP Grade 4 Mathematics







White 9 41 42 8

Multiracial * * * *




*Reporting standards not met.

119



Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012- 13)

NAEP Grade 8 Reading







White 14 40 40 6

Multiracial * * * *

Students with Disabilities 56 36 8 *



NAEP Grade 8 Mathematics







White 15 41 34 10

Multiracial * * * *


Limited English Proficient 75 21 3 1


*Reporting standards not met.

120



Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012- 13)

NAEP Participation Rates

Grade 4 Reading Participation Rate

Students with Disabilities 94

Limited English Proficient 93

Grade 4 Mathematics Participation Rate



Grade 8 Reading Participation Rate



Grade 8 Mathematics Participation Rate



121



District: 2009

Cohort

District: 2008

Cohort

Statewide: 2009

Cohort

Statewide: 2008

Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4%4%4% 3%3%3%

47%47%47%

38%38%38%

84%84%84%

3%3%3% 2%2%2%

37%37%37%

47%47%47%

84%84%84%

4%4%4% 4%4%4%

44%44%44%

38%38%38%

81%81%81%

4%4%4% 3%3%3%

44%44%44%

38%38%38%

82%82%82%


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Yearsof InstructionTotal cohort results are those for New York State Regents examinations only.

Results by Student Group 2009 Cohort 2008 Cohort

Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


All Students 341 4 3 47 38 84 333 3 2 37 47 84






White 147 0 0 37 59 96 108 1 1 22 72 94

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 161 2 2 46 45 91 142 2 2 32 55 87

Male 180 4 4 47 32 79 191 3 2 41 41 82





Not Migrant 341 4 3 47 38 84 333 3 2 37 47 84

122



District: 2009

Cohort

District: 2008

Cohort

Statewide: 2009

Cohort

Statewide: 2008

Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

3%3%3%

6%

62%62%62%

24%24%24%

87%87%87%

7% 7%

61%61%61%

20%20%20%

81%81%81%

4%4%4%

5%

60%60%60%

24%24%24%

84%84%84%

4%4%4%

5%

60%60%60%

22%22%22%

82%82%82%


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years ofInstructionTotal cohort results are those for New York State Regents examinations only.


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


All Students 341 3 6 62 24 87 333 7 7 61 20 81






White 147 1 2 54 40 94 108 2 1 60 35 95

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 161 1 4 61 30 91 142 2 11 58 25 82

Male 180 4 7 63 19 82 191 10 5 63 17 81





Not Migrant 341 3 6 62 24 87 333 7 7 61 20 81

123



District: 2009

Cohort

District: 2008

Cohort

Statewide: 2009

Cohort

Statewide: 2008

Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

2%2%2% 3%3%3%

51%51%51%

35%35%35%

86%86%86%

7%

4%4%4%

50%50%50%

29%29%29%

79%79%79%

6% 5%

48%48%48%

30%30%30%

78%78%78%

6%

4%4%4%

45%45%45%

32%32%32%

77%77%77%


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after FourYears of InstructionTotal cohort results are those for New York State Regents examinations only.


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


All Students 341 2 3 51 35 86 333 7 4 50 29 79






White 147 2 2 42 52 95 108 2 2 52 41 93

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 161 1 4 52 40 91 142 5 4 52 31 83

Male 180 3 3 51 31 82 191 8 4 49 28 76





Not Migrant 341 2 3 51 35 86 333 7 4 50 29 79

124



District: 2009

Cohort

District: 2008

Cohort

Statewide: 2009

Cohort

Statewide: 2008

Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4%4%4% 3%3%3%

35%35%35%

49%49%49%

84%84%84%

4%4%4%

6%

41%41%41% 39%39%39%

80%80%80%

4%4%4% 3%3%3%

37%37%37%42%42%42%

79%79%79%

4%4%4% 3%3%3%

36%36%36%

42%42%42%

78%78%78%


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after FourYears of InstructionTotal cohort results are those for New York State Regents examinations only.


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


All Students 341 4 3 35 49 84 333 4 6 41 39 80






White 147 0 1 27 69 96 108 0 1 34 62 96

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 161 2 2 33 56 89 142 3 6 40 42 82

Male 180 4 3 36 43 79 191 4 5 41 37 77





Not Migrant 341 4 3 35 49 84 333 4 6 41 39 80

125



District: 2009

Cohort

District: 2008

Cohort

Statewide: 2009

Cohort

Statewide: 2008

Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4%4%4% 4%4%4%

46%46%46%

40%40%40%

86%86%86%

5% 5%

51%51%51%

33%33%33%

83%83%83%

4%4%4% 4%4%4%

46%46%46%

36%36%36%

82%82%82%

4%4%4% 4%4%4%

47%47%47%

34%34%34%

81%81%81%


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of InstructionTotal cohort results are those for New York State Regents examinations only.


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


Numberof

Students


1 2 3 4


All Students 341 4 4 46 40 86 333 5 5 51 33 83






White 147 1 2 38 58 96 108 2 0 40 56 95

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ _ _


Female 161 3 2 48 44 92 142 2 5 51 35 87

Male 180 4 5 44 37 81 191 6 5 50 31 81





Not Migrant 341 4 4 46 40 86 333 5 5 51 33 83

126



Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)

Results by Student Group Comprehensive English Integrated Algebra

TotalTested

Percent of students scoring at or above

55 65 85

TotalTested


55 65 85

All Students 338 94 84 24 410 90 81 15

General Education 298 96 88 26 356 93 86 17

Students with Disabilities 40 78 58 10 54 67 44 2

American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander11 _ _ _ 15 _ _ _

Black or African American 60 90 77 13 75 83 76 5

Hispanic or Latino 156 92 79 13 217 87 74 9

White 109 97 95 43 100 98 96 26

Multiracial 2 _ _ _ 3 _ _ _

Small Group Total 13 100 92 38 18 100 94 61

Female 166 95 89 25 185 91 82 16

Male 172 93 80 23 225 88 80 14

English Proficient 313 96 88 26 357 92 84 17

Limited English Proficient 25 64 32 0 53 70 57 0

Economically Disadvantaged 120 90 74 9 178 83 71 8

Not Economically Disadvantaged 218 96 90 32 232 94 88 20

Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 338 94 84 24 410 90 81 15

127




Results by Student Group Geometry Algebra 2/Trigonometry

TotalTested


55 65 85

TotalTested


55 65 85

All Students 216 95 82 23 146 85 72 37

General Education 213 _ _ _ 142 _ _ _

Students with Disabilities 3 _ _ _ 4 _ _ _


Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander15 _ _ _ 11 91 91 55



White 96 95 90 29 68 88 74 43

Multiracial 2 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0


Female 112 96 86 27 81 81 68 38

Male 104 94 78 19 65 89 77 35

English Proficient 208 95 84 24 144 _ _ _

Limited English Proficient 8 88 38 0 2 _ _ _



Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 216 95 82 23 146 85 72 37

128




Results by Student Group Global History and Geography U.S. History & Government

TotalTested


55 65 85

TotalTested


55 65 85

All Students 344 91 80 35 320 92 83 40







White 109 97 93 57 108 98 95 62

Multiracial 3 _ _ _ 4 _ _ _


Female 174 92 79 36 151 92 82 40

Male 170 91 81 34 169 92 83 41





Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 344 91 80 35 320 92 83 40

129




Results by Student Group Living Environment Physical Setting/Earth Science

TotalTested


55 65 85

TotalTested


55 65 85

All Students 361 89 79 34 381 86 71 26




Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander16 _ _ _ 14 100 100 64



White 112 98 96 57 97 94 87 45

Multiracial 2 _ _ _ 6 100 83 0


Female 171 89 78 37 192 86 68 24

Male 190 89 79 31 189 85 74 29





Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 361 89 79 34 381 86 71 26

130




Results by Student Group Physical Setting/Chemistry Physical Setting/Physics

TotalTested


55 65 85

TotalTested


55 65 85

All Students 167 95 75 10 66 95 79 33

General Education 163 _ _ _ 64 _ _ _

Students with Disabilities 4 _ _ _ 2 _ _ _



Black or African American 24 92 63 0 2 _ _ _


White 73 95 84 12 46 96 80 39

Multiracial 1 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0


Female 87 97 78 10 26 92 69 23

Male 80 93 73 9 40 98 85 40

English Proficient 166 _ _ _ 66 95 79 33

Limited English Proficient 1 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0



Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 167 95 75 10 66 95 79 33

131



Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)

Results by Student Group Reading Writing Math

Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing

All Students 19 42 7 86 3 _

General Education 1 _ 0 0 0 _

Students with Disabilities 18 _ 7 86 3 _

American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0 0 0 0

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0

Black or African American 11 36 4 _ 2 _

Hispanic or Latino 6 _ 2 _ 1 _

White 2 _ 1 _ 0 0

Multiracial 0 0 0 0 0 0

Small Group Total 8 50 7 86 3 _

Female 6 33 3 _ 2 _

Male 13 46 4 _ 1 _

English Proficient 17 _ 5 _ 2 _

Limited English Proficient 2 _ 2 _ 1 _

Economically Disadvantaged 11 45 3 _ 1 _

Not Economically Disadvantaged 8 38 4 _ 2 _

Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 _

Not Migrant 19 42 7 86 3 _

132



Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)

Results by Student Group Global Studies U.S. History & Government Science

Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing Total Tested Percent Passing

All Students 8 38 6 17 8 50

General Education 0 0 0 0 1 _

Students with Disabilities 8 38 6 17 7 _

American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0 0 0 0

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0

Black or African American 3 _ 1 _ 4 _

Hispanic or Latino 4 _ 4 _ 3 _

White 1 _ 1 _ 1 _

Multiracial 0 0 0 0 0 0

Small Group Total 8 38 6 17 8 50

Female 2 _ 1 _ 1 _

Male 6 _ 5 _ 7 _

English Proficient 7 _ 5 _ 6 _

Limited English Proficient 1 _ 1 _ 2 _

Economically Disadvantaged 3 _ 2 _ 4 _

Not Economically Disadvantaged 5 _ 4 _ 4 _

Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0

Not Migrant 8 38 6 17 8 50

133



New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)

Grade/Subject Total TestedNumber Scoring at Level(s)

1 2 3 4

% Proficient (Levels3 and 4)

Grade 3 ELA 2 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 3 Math 2 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 4 ELA 1 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 4 Math 1 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 4 Science 1 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 5 ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 5 Math 3 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 6 ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 6 Math 3 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 7 ELA 2 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 7 Math 2 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 8 ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 8 Math 3 _ _ _ _ _

Grade 8 Science 3 _ _ _ _ _

Secondary-Level ELA 3 _ _ _ _ _

Secondary-Level Math 3 _ _ _ _ _

134



New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)Results (2012 - 13)

Kindergarten Total TestedPercent of Students Scoring at Level(s)

Beginning Intermediate Advanced Proficient

All Students 61 2% 3% 39% 56%

General Education 58 _ _ _ _

Students with Disabilities 3 _ _ _ _

Grade 1 Total TestedPercent of Students Scoring at Level(s)


All Students 52 2% 33% 50% 15%





All Students 62 6% 13% 69% 11%

General Education 55 7% 11% 69% 13%

Students with Disabilities 7 0% 29% 71% 0%



All Students 65 2% 17% 60% 22%





All Students 35 9% 17% 43% 31%





All Students 27 11% 11% 44% 33%





All Students 28 11% 18% 57% 14%





13 0% 8% 85% 8%



All Students 26 15% 27% 42% 15%





All Students 18 44% 0% 50% 6%





All Students 31 13% 29% 26% 32%





All Students 19 26% 42% 26% 5%





All Students 33 33% 15% 36% 15%





All Students 27 0% 37% 52% 11%



136



Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

Student Group MadeAYP

Tested95%

StudentsEnrolled During

the TestAdministration

Period

Percent ofEnrolled

Students w ithValid Test

Scores

PI >= EAMOor Safe

Harbor Target

TestedStudents

Enrolled onBEDS Day

PI EAMOSafe

HarborTarget

All Students ✔ ✔ 1,994 100% ✔ 1,930 96 80 80

American Indian or Alaska Native ― ― 1 ― ― 1 ― ― ―

Black or African American ✔ ✔ 253 100% ✔ 245 87 52 52

Hispanic or Latino ✔ ✔ 1,045 100% ✔ 1,003 72 62 62

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander ✔ ✔ 95 100% ✔ 94 147 106 106

White ✔ ✔ 571 100% ✔ 558 134 100 100

Multiracial ― ― 29 ― ― 29 ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities ✔ ✔ 284 99% ✔ 291✝ 29✝ 29 29

Limited English Proficient ✘ ✔ 200 99% ✘ 309‡ 30‡ 33 33

Economically Disadvantaged ✔ ✔ 936 100% ✔ 915 64 62 62

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

Student Group Students Enrolled During theTest Administration Period

Percent of Enrolled Studentswith Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled onBEDS Day

PI

Not American Indian or AlaskaNative 1,993 100% 1,929 96

Not Black or African American 1,741 100% 1,685 97

Not Hispanic or Latino 949 100% 927 122

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 1,899 100% 1,836 93

Not White 1,423 100% 1,372 80

Not Multiracial 1,965 100% 1,901 96

General Education 1,710 100% 1,651 108

English Proficient 1,794 100% 1,762 103

Not Economically Disadvantaged 1,058 100% 1,015 124

Male 1,034 100% 998 88

Female 960 100% 932 104

Migrant 1 ― 1 ―

Not Migrant 1,993 100% 1,929 96

✔ Yes

✘ No

― There w ere few er than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students w ith Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there w ere few er than

30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

✝ Includes former students w ith disabilities because the number of students w ith disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

‡ Includes former limited English proficient students because the number of limited English proficient students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

137



Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability



Tested95%



Period

Percent ofEnrolled


Scores

PI >= EAMOor Safe

Harbor Target

TestedStudents

Enrolled onBEDS Day

PI EAMOSafe

HarborTarget

All Students ✔ ✔ 1,994 100% ✔ 1,935 90 77 77



Hispanic or Latino ✔ ✔ 1,045 100% ✔ 1,015 72 59 59

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander ✔ ✔ 95 99% ✔ 93 147 124 124

White ✔ ✔ 570 99% ✔ 552 125 94 94

Multiracial ― ― 29 ― ― 29 ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities ✘ ✔ 283 99% ✘ 289✝ 30✝ 31 31

Limited English Proficient ✔ ✔ 200 100% ✔ 321‡ 39‡ 37 37






PI

Not American Indian or AlaskaNative 1,993 100% 1,934 91

Not Black or African American 1,740 100% 1,690 94


Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 1,899 100% 1,842 88

Not White 1,424 100% 1,383 77

Not Multiracial 1,965 100% 1,906 90

General Education 1,711 100% 1,658 101

English Proficient 1,794 100% 1,754 97

Not Economically Disadvantaged 1,059 99% 1,009 115

Male 1,033 99% 998 90

Female 961 100% 937 91

Migrant 1 ― 1 ―

Not Migrant 1,993 100% 1,934 91

✔ Yes

✘ No


30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.



138



Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability



Tested80%



Period

Percent ofEnrolled


Scores

PI >= EAMOor Progress

Target

TestedStudents

Enrolled onBEDS Day

PI EAMOProgress

Target

All Students ✔ ✔ 655 99% ✔ 628 180 177 177



Hispanic or Latino ✔ ✔ 344 99% ✔ 331 174 163 163

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander ✔ ― 30 ― ✔ 30 200 171 171

White ✔ ✔ 185 98% ✔ 175 191 184 184

Multiracial ― ― 10 ― ― 10 ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities ✘ ✔ 79 97% ✘ 80✝ 125✝ 147 147

Limited English Proficient ✔ ✔ 54 98% ✔ 65‡ 143‡ 143 143






PI

Not American Indian or AlaskaNative 655 99% 628 180

Not Black or African American 569 99% 546 181


Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 625 99% 598 179

Not White 470 99% 453 175

Not Multiracial 645 99% 618 179

General Education 576 99% 552 188

English Proficient 601 99% 585 184

Not Economically Disadvantaged 349 99% 327 191

Male 341 99% 325 180

Female 314 99% 303 180

Migrant 0 ― 0 ―

Not Migrant 655 99% 628 180

✔ Yes

✘ No


30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.



139



Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability



Tested95%

12th GradersPercent of

12th Graderswith Valid

Test Scores

PI >= EAMOor Safe

Harbor Target

2009Accountability

CohortMembers

PI EAMOSafe

HarborTarget

All Students ✔ ✔ 340 100% ✔ 317 161 157 157




Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander ― ― 14 ― ― 14 ― ― ―

White ✔ ✔ 142 100% ✔ 142 187 167 167

Multiracial ― ― 2 ― ― 3 ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities ✔ ― 30 ― ✔ 35✝ 94✝ 90 90

Limited English Proficient ― ― 29 ― ― 21 ― ― ―

Economically Disadvantaged ✘ ✔ 102 100% ✘ 88 128 135 135


Student Group 12th Graders Percent of 12th Graders withValid Test Scores

2009 Accountability CohortMembers

PI





Not White 198 100% 175 139





Male 174 100% 169 150

Female 166 100% 148 173

Migrant 0 ― 0 ―

Not Migrant 340 100% 317 161

✔ Yes

✘ No

― There w ere few er than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders w ith Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there w ere few er than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort,

so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.


140



Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability



Tested95%

12th GradersPercent of

12th Graderswith Valid

Test Scores

PI >= EAMOor Safe

Harbor Target

2009Accountability

CohortMembers

PI EAMOSafe

HarborTarget

All Students ✔ ✔ 340 100% ✔ 317 145 136 136




Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander ― ― 14 ― ― 14 ― ― ―

White ✔ ✔ 142 100% ✔ 142 165 149 149

Multiracial ― ― 2 ― ― 3 ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities ✘ ― 30 ― ✘ 35✝ 69✝ 77 77

Limited English Proficient ― ― 29 ― ― 21 ― ― ―



Student Group 12th Graders Percent of 12th Graders withValid Test Scores

2009 Accountability CohortMembers

PI





Not White 198 99% 175 129





Male 174 99% 169 131

Female 166 100% 148 161

Migrant 0 ― 0 ―

Not Migrant 340 100% 317 145

✔ Yes

✘ No

― There w ere few er than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders w ith Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there w ere few er than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort,

so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.


141



Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

Student GroupElementary/

Middle-Level ELAPI

Elementary/Middle-Level Math

PI

Secondary-LevelELA PI

Secondary-LevelMath PI

Unweighted CombinedPI

All Students 96 90 161 145 123

American Indian or Alaska Native ― ― ― ― ―

Black or African American 87 69 141 117 104

Hispanic or Latino 72 72 134 126 101

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 147 147 ― ― 147

White 134 125 187 165 153

Multiracial ― ― ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities 29 30 94 69 56

Limited English Proficient 30 39 ― ― 35

Economically Disadvantaged 64 63 128 123 95

― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

142



Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability


Student Group Made AYP

All Students ✔

American Indian or Alaska Native ―

Black or African American ✔

Hispanic or Latino ✘

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander ―

White ✔

Multiracial ―

Students With Disabilities ✔

Limited English Proficient ✘

Economically Disadvantaged ✔

✔ Made AYP

✘ Did not make AYP

― There w ere not enough students to make an AYP determination.

143



Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

Student GroupMet Graduation-Rate

Criterion

2008 Four-YearGraduation-Rate

Total CohortGraduation Rate State Standard Progress Target

All Students ✘ 333 77% 80% 78%

American Indian or Alaska Native ― 0 ― ― ―

Black or African American ✔ 52 77% 80% 76%

Hispanic or Latino ✘ 154 64% 80% 65%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander ― 16 ― ― ―

White ✔ 108 96% 80% 80%

Multiracial ― 3 ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities ✔ 64✝ 67%✝ 80% 61%

Limited English Proficient ✘ 37‡ 24%‡ 80% 45%

Economically Disadvantaged ✔ 121 69% 80% 64%

✔ Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.

✘ Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.

― There w ere few er than 30 students in the cohort.



144



Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

Student GroupMet Graduation-Rate

Criterion

2007 Five-YearGraduation-Rate

Total CohortGraduation Rate State Standard Progress Target

All Students ✔ 350 80% 80% 80%

American Indian or Alaska Native ― 0 ― ― ―

Black or African American ✔ 59 80% 80% 79%

Hispanic or Latino ✘ 136 68% 80% 70%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander ― 17 ― ― ―

White ✔ 136 90% 80% 80%

Multiracial ― 2 ― ― ―

Students With Disabilities ✔ 41✝ 66%✝ 80% 63%

Limited English Proficient ✘ 46‡ 50%‡ 80% 53%

Economically Disadvantaged ✘ 99 70% 80% 71%

✔ Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.

✘ Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.




145



Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability


Student Group

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

2008 Four-YearGraduation-Rate Total

CohortGraduation Rate

2007 Five-YearGraduation-Rate Total

CohortGraduation Rate

Not American Indian or AlaskaNative 333 77% 350 80%

Not Black or African American 281 77% 291 80%

Not Hispanic or Latino 179 88% 214 88%

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/OtherPacific Islander 317 78% 333 79%

Not White 225 68% 214 74%

Not Multiracial 330 77% 348 80%

General Education 269 80% 309 82%

English Proficient 303 83% 316 85%

Not Economically Disadvantaged 212 82% 251 84%

Male 191 74% 178 78%

Female 142 81% 172 82%

Migrant 0 ― 0 ―

Not Migrant 333 77% 350 80%


Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsementfor Accountability

Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:

Regents Diploma with an AdvancedDesignation (This District)

40%

Regents Diploma with an AdvancedDesignation (Statewide)

30%

Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide

YES

Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (ThisDistrict)

0%

Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement(Statewide)

3%

Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide

NO

© Copyright 2014 NYSED. This document was created on: April 30, 2014, 1:22 pm

EST

146

4/30/2014 2013 | OSSINING UFSD - Fiscal Summary | New York State Education Department Data Site

http://data.nysed.gov/fiscal.php?year=2013&instid=800000035059 1/3

Fiscal Accountability Summary

Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general education and special

education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts and all public schools.

The required ratios for this district are reported below.

The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the

State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the Student Information

Repository System (SIRS). These data are from the 2011 - 12 school year.

This School District General Education Special Education

Instructional Expenditures $58,986,743 $24,225,287

Pupils 4,339 580

Expenditures Per Pupil $13,595 $41,768

Similar District Group (AverageNeed/Resource Capacity) General Education Special Education

Instructional Expenditures $8,266,153,234 $3,167,391,005

Pupils 785,995 108,241


All School Districts General Education Special Education

Instructional Expenditures $31,088,294,986 $12,418,610,168

Pupils 2,676,495 411,123


Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding

Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and instructional support expenditures.

These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education

setting. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not

included.

The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the

district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all pupils, including those classified

as having disabilities and those not classified, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district.

147



;

Pupils resident in the district but attending a charter school are included.For districts in which a county jail

is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education

program.

Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities

(including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-level administrative and

instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-

wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the 2011-12 school

year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus students for whom the

district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private

placements and out-of-state placements are included.

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The

total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both general- and special-education

expenditures. Special-education services provided in the generaleducation classroom may benefit students

not classified as having disabilities.

Total Expenditures Per Pupil

This School District

$24,509

Similar District Group

$19,290

NY State

$20,906

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total

Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as expenditures for

transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the

Instructional Expenditure values for General Education and Special Education. As such, the sum of General

Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.

Information about Students with Disabilities (2012 - 13)

Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in

general education classrooms and the classification rate of students with disabilities. These data are to be

compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this

district are reported below.

Student PlacementThis School District

Similar District Group(Average Need/Resource

Capacity)NY State

148



(Percent of Time InsideRegular Classroom)

Number ofStudents

Percent ofStudents Percent of Students Percent of Students

80% or more 324 61.1% 57.7% 57.8%

40% - 79% 118 22.3% 18.8% 11.7%

Less than 40% 58 10.9% 16.9% 21.4%

Separate Settings 19 3.6% 4.1% 6.2%

Other Settings 11 2.1% 2.5% 2.9%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository

System (SIRS) and verified in Verification Report 5. The counts are numbers of students reported in the

least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on October 3, 2012. The

percentages represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms,

regardless of the amount and cost of special education services they receive. Rounding of percentage

values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

School-age Students with Disabilities Classfication Rate

This School District

11.0%

Similar District Group

12.1%

NY State

13.1%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of

all school-age students in the school district, including students who are parentally placed in nonpublic

schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district

has Committee on Special Education (CSE) responsibility to ensure the provision of special education

services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of

parentally placed students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the

nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the Basic

Education Data System (BEDS).

Similar District Groups are identified according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information

is available on our NRC capacity categories page.

© Copyright 2014 NYSED. This document was created on: April 30, 2014, 1:24 pm

EST

149

http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/2011-12/NeedResourceCapacityIndex.pdf

Final Proposed School Budget 2014-15

Education

Transcript of Final Proposed School Budget 2014-15