Final Presentation
description
Transcript of Final Presentation
Final Presentation
JoAnnah MichaelPRTSM 504: Data Mgmt. and Appls. in PRTSM
Dr. Myron Floyd w December 16, 2013
ObjectivesThe objective was to measure the usage of Carmichael Gym by On Campus and Off Campus NCSU Students. This information will be used to determine how marketing efforts should be focused to encourage gym usage.
MethodsReside: Place of Residence was measured as categorical and had a numeric scale ranging from 1 to 2 (1=On Campus, 2=Off Campus).CGYM: Use of Carmichael Gym was measured as continuous and had a numerical scale ranging from 0-3 (0=Do not use, 1=1-2 days, 2=3-4 days, 3=5 or more days).
Descriptive Inferential Statistics
2
Descriptive Statistics
3
Table 1: A Comparison of Gym Usage by Residence Status
On Campus (n=87) Off Campus (n=298)
Mean Use of Carmichael Gym
1.149 1.144
On CampusOff Campus
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
87
298
NCS
U S
tude
nts
Usi
ng G
ym
Figure 1. A Comparison of Carmichael Gym Usage by NCSU Residence Status
Descriptive Statistics
3
Table 2: NCSU Students Surveyed Gender
On Campus (n=87) Off Campus (n=298)
Mean Use of Carmichael Gym
1.149 1.144
3
Table 3: A Comparison of Outdoor Tennis Usage by Residence Status
On Campus (n=87) Off Campus (n=298)
Mean Use of Carmichael Gym
0.09 0.09
On CampusOff Campus
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
87
298
NCS
U S
tude
nts
Usi
ng G
ym
Figure 3. A Comparison of Carmichael Gym Usage by NCSU Residence Status
3
Table 7: A Comparison of Usage of Tennis Courts by Residence Status
On Campus (n=87) Off Campus (n=299)
Mean Use of Outdoor Tennis
0.09 0.09
On Campus Off Campus0
50
100
150
200
250
300
87
299
Figure 3. A Comparison of Outdoor Tennis Usage by Residence Status
NCS
U St
uden
ts U
sing
Gym
3
Table 2: A Comparison of Gym Usage by Gender
Male (n=221) Female (n=168)
Mean Use of Carmichael Gym
1.17 1.09
Male Female0
50
100
150
200
250
221
168
Figure 2. A Comparison of Carmichael Gym Usage by Gender
NCS
U S
tude
nts
Usi
ng G
ym
3
Table 4: A Comparison of Outdoor Tennis Usage by Gender
Male (n=221) Female (n=168)
Mean Use of Outdoor Tennis
0.06 0.14
Male Female0
50
100
150
200
250
221
168
Figure 4. A Comparison of Outdoor Tennis Usage by Gender Status
NCS
U St
uden
ts U
sing
Gym
Is gym usage related to residence status? Is it statistically significant?
The null hypothesis (HO): Mean (On Campus) = Mean (Off Campus)
Inferential Statistics
4
Table 2: Comparison of Mean Usage of Carmichael Gym Using Residence Status
Mean Usage of Carmichael Gym
StandardDeviation
t-statistic P-value
On Campus 1.149 1.006 0.043 0.97
Off Campus 1.144 0.965
Results
5
On Campus Off Campus
Table 3: t-Test: Two Sample Assuming Equal Variances Usage of Carmichael Gym Using Residence Status
Results
Table 3: t-Test: Two Sample Assuming Equal Variances Usage of Carmichael Gym Using Residence Status
There was no difference in time spent in the gym between the residence statuses. P was greater than .05 (p=0.97) We fail to reject the Null Hypothesis.
The Mean (On Campus) =Mean (Off Campus)
There is no need to adjust our marketing strategy at this time. On Campus and Off Campus students visit the gym at the same rates.
Conclusion
6
Thank You!