Final minutes of 204 SEAC meeting dated...
Transcript of Final minutes of 204 SEAC meeting dated...
Minutes of 204th SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
The 204th meeting of SEAC was held in Directorate of Environment, U.P. on
21/02/2015. Following members were present in the meeting along with Secretary,
SEAC:
1. Dr. M. S. Khan, Chairman
2. Shri S.N. Singh Member
3. Dr. S.K. Upadhayay Member
4. Dr. Asheesh Kumar Singh Member
5. Shri S.C. Bramhchari Member
6. Dr. D. C. Gupta, Member
7. Shri Sanjay Kumar, I.A.S. Secretary
The Chairman welcomed the members to the 204th SEAC meeting.
The minutes of 203rd SEAC meeting dated 20/02/2015 were confirmed.
The Members of SEAC unanimously taken following decisions on the agenda points
discussed:
1- Group Housing Project “Cosmic Corporate Park-3” at Plot No-1, Sector-154, Noida,
U.P. M/s Surya Jyoti Software Pvt. Ltd. Sri Sandeep Pahwa, Director, 281, Azad
Mandi, Delhi, File No. 2082/ AD-H.
The committee noted that Mr. Sandeep Pahwa, Director, M/s Surya Jyoti Software
Pvt. Ltd. submitted an application dated 01/10/2013 in the Directorate for environmental
clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Project “Cosmic Corporate Park-3” at Plot No-1,
Sector-154, Noida, U.P. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 07/06/2014
wherein the project proponent did not appear. The committee also observed that the project
reports have also not been circulated to Members. The matter was deferred. The matter was
again scheduled for appraisal in SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Lakhvendar Singh, authorized representative
alongwith their consultant M/s Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata. The committee
observed that plot area of the project is mentioned as 20,002.40 sqm however the possession
on the site has only been provided for plot area 15,000 sqm by the Noida Authority. The
committee also observed that the whole proposal is calculated for plot area 20,002.40 sqm
which should be revised as per actual availability of land. The committee also found that
some constructed areas like parking, basement etc. have not been included in built-up area.
The committee directed the project proponent to revise and submit the matter for appraisal.
The matter is deferred till submission of revised proposals. The matter shall discussed by
committee after submission of information as above.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 2 of 62
2- Expansion of Group Housing Project "Galaxy North Avenue" at plot no. GC-3,
Gaur City-1, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. Ms. Manju Sharma, G.M. Project, D-255, Vivek
Vihar, New Delhi File No. 2277/ DD-Sh.
The committee noted that M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. submitted an
application dated 05/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance of Expansion of
Group Housing Project "Galaxy North Avenue", GC-3, Gaur City, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. The
mater was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 10/01/2015 wherein the project
proponent did not appear. Later, though their letter dated 12/01/2015 the proponent informed
that he could not attend the meeting dated 10/01/2015 due to health reasons and requested to
include the matter in SEAC agenda for consideration. The matter was again scheduled for
appraisal in SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Rajesh Jodhani, project proponent along with their
consultant M/s EQMS India Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and
the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Expansion of Group Housing Project
"Galaxy North Avenue" at plot no. GC-3, Gaur City-1, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. M/s
Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd.
2. M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure (P) Ltd. has taken environment clearance for
development of the Project Integrated Township “Gaur City” at GH-01, Sector-4,
Greater Noida, G.B.Nagar, U.P vide letter no. 470/SEAC/531/2010/AA(S)/ dated
11th January, 2011. M/s Gaursons has also obtained Consent to Establish from
UPPCB for construction of the project vide letter no. F78749 C-1/N/N.O.C-
686/2010/5 dated 12th January, 2011.
• M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure (P) Ltd. has allotted plot no GC-03 (part of
plot GH-01) to M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. for development of
Group Housing Project “North Avenue-I”.
• M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. has developed group housing “North
Avenue-I” at Plot No. GC-3, Gaur City-1, Plot No.GH-01, Sector-4, Greater
Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Plot area of this project is 20000 sq.m (4.942 acres). Project
comprises of development of living facility (Block A-F) and allied facilities like
community building, rain water harvesting facility, power supply, landscaping,
roads, water supply system and waste management system. Built-up area of
72846.836 sqm is constructed at the project site till date.
• M/s Galaxy International Realtech (P) Ltd. has planned to expand the project by
developing an additional Block G comprising of 225 dwelling units within the plot
GC-03 to avail additional purchasable FAR of 75% with permission of GNIDA.
Built-up area of the project after expansion will be 96852.071 sqm.
3. Area details of the project are as follows:
S.
N.
Description Existing
Area (sq m)
Expansion
Area (sq m)
Total Area
(sq m)
Area
Percentage
(%)
1 Plot Area 20000 100%
2 Permissible Ground Coverage (@35%
of plot area)
7000 --
3 Proposed Ground Coverage
(@25.84% of plot area)
3922.789 1246.16 5168.949 25.84 %
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 3 of 62
4 Permissible FAR (@350% of plot
area)
70000 --
5 Proposed FAR (@336.176% of plot
area)
47877.933 19357.281 67235.214 --
6 Permissible 15% FAR 10500 --
7 Proposed 15% of FAR 5183.581 1454.73 6638.311 --
8 Community Hall (included within
FAR)
231.69 0 231.69 --
9 Stilt Area 3020.122 1181.224 4201.346 --
10 Podium 3501.70 0 3501.70 --
11 Basement Area 13264.2 2012.0 15276.2 --
12 Built-up Area 72847.536 24005.235 96852.771 --
13 Open Area 14831.051 74.16 %
37.08%
25.84%
11.24%
14 Green Area (@50% of open area) 7416.0
15 Area Under Roads 5168.593
16 Other Paved Area 2246.458
17 Maximum Height of Building 90 m --
18 No. of dwelling units 590 225 815 --
4. Built-up details of the project are as follows: Tower Total Gr.
Coverage Total FAR 15%
permissible
FAR
Non-FAR /Stilt
Parking Area
Built up No. of Floors
No. of Units/Floor
Total Dwelling
Units
Block A 504.515 6365.382 609.935 478.611 7453.946 B+S+14 6 84
Block B 569.257 7268.604 600.782 541.016 8410.402 B+S+14 8 112
Block C 569.257 7268.604 600.782 541.016 8410.402 B+S+14 8 112
Block D 504.515 6365.382 609.935 478.611 7453.946 B+S+14 6 84
Block E 653.264 8582.446 858.052 590.228 10030.726 B+S+14 6 84
Block F 722.281 12027.515 1504.395 390.64 13922.555 B+S+19 6 114
Block G (Expansion)
1246.16 19357.281 1454.73 1181.224 21993.234 B+S+25 9 225
Podium -- -- -- 3501.70 3501.70 -- -- --
Basement -- -- -- 15276.2 15276.2 -- -- --
Staircase 37.00 -- 37 -- 37 -- -- --
LT HT
Meter
Room
101.45 -- 101.45 -- 101.45 -- -- --
Watchman
Room
9.00 -- 9 -- 9 -- -- --
Water
Tank
155.00 -- 155 -- 155 -- -- --
Platform for
Transformer
72.25 -- 72.25 -- 72.25 -- -- --
HT meter
room
25.00 -- 25 -- 25 -- -- --
Total 5168.9 67235.214 6638.311 22979.246 96852.771 -- -- 815
5. Salient feature of the project is as follows: S.
No.
Description Existing Expansion
1. Geographical coordinates of the
Project Site
Latitude: 28°33’21.86” N, Longitude: 77°26’29.34” E
2. Plot Area 20,000.10 m
2
3. Estimated Population 3393 1294
4. Built-up Area 72847.536 m
2
24005.235 m2
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 4 of 62
5. Solid Waste Generated 1556.65 kg/day 593.45 kg/day
6. Electricity load (Noida Power
Company Ltd.)
2733 KW
1025 KW
7. Backup Power 2000 KVA
8. No. of RWH pits 4 Pits
9. Parking proposed 947 ECS
10. Total Water Requirement 299 KLD 101 KLD
11. Fresh Water Requirement 183 KLD 71 KLD
12. Source of water Municipal Supply
5. Water requirement of the project is as follows: Category Water
Req./capita
(liters)
Existing
Occupancy
(Nos.)/ Area
Existing
Water Req.
(KLD)
Expansion
Occupancy
(Nos.)/
Area
Expansion
Water
Req.
(KLD)
Total
Occupancy
(Nos.)/
Area
Total
Water
Req.
(KLD)
Residents 86 2950 254 1125 97 4075 351
Staff 30 148
4
56 2 204 6
Visitors 15 295 4 113 2 408 6
Domestic Water
Requirement
3393 262 1294 101 4687 363
Landscape 3 l/sq m 7416.0 sq m 22 -- -- 7416.0 sq
m
22
DG
Cooling
0.9l/kVA/hr 2000 kVA 15 -- -- 2000 kVA 15
Total Water
Requirement
-- 299 -- 101 -- 400
6. Waste water details of the project is as follows: Category Existing
Quantity
(KLD)
Expansion
Quantity (KLD)
Total (Existing +
Expansion) KLD
Total Water Requirement 299 101 400
Domestic Water Requirement 262 101 363
Fresh Water Requirement (@70% of dom.
Water req.)
183 71 254
Flushing Water Requirement (@30% of dom.
Water req.)
79 30 109
Sewage Generated (80% fresh water for
domestic use +100% flushing water)
225 87 312
Capacity of STP 375
Recovered Water from STP
• Flushing
• DG Cooling
• Landscaping
• Maintaining artificial water body/ fire-fighting/car & road
washing/Municipal Sewer
250
109.0
15.0
22.0
104.0
7. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee noted that the proponent has submitted revised sanctioned Greater
Noida Industrial Development Authority, Structural design approval from Jamia Millia Islamiya, Fie NOC, Airport Authority of India NOC, Site plan, Plumbing plan, parking plan,
rain water harvesting plan, electrical layout, fire fighting plan, landscape plan, storm water management plan, basement plan. The committee discussed the matter and recommended
grant of environmental clearance to the proposals for Expansion of Group Housing Project
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 5 of 62
"Galaxy North Avenue" at plot no. GC-3, Gaur City-1, Sector-4, Noida, U.P. alongwith
general conditions as prescribed by the authority for construction project and following
specific conditions:
1. All necessary regulatory approvals regarding expansion of the proposed project shall be
obtained after approval of expansion in FAR by GNIDA.
2. Adequate green cover not less than 33% of the plotted area should be provided within
the premises. 3. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more
capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for
designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization. 4. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken with regular testing and monitoring
of treated water. 5. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to
be used in-house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving it to end
users.
6. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision
amounting to Rs. 1.0 crore of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board
of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the
authority.
7. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in
accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as
amended).
8. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan
submitted.
9. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% Solar lighting is to be
provided in the common areas/common stairs. 10. Parking guideline as per Greater Noida Development Authority should be followed.
Parking for disabled persons should be explored. 11. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.
12. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.
13. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after
permission from CGWB.
14. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets
capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building.
15. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP
to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.
16. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.
17. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.
18. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of
residents.
19. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be
followed for construction work.
20. Dual plumbing should be adopted.
21. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent
authority. 22. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any
buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 6 of 62
23. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In
case of default the Environmental Clearance will deem to be cancelled.
24. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for
construction.
25. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.
26. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose.
27. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc. Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including
the proper treatment and the disposal of the wastes.
3- Group Housing Project at Khasra No-962 M, Vill-Noor Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s
Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd. Sri Rajeev Agrawal, Director, R-8/54, Raj
Nagar, Ghaziabad U.P. File No. 2332/AD-Sub
The committee noted that M/s Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd. submitted an
application dated 19/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance for Group
Housing Project at Khasra No-962 M, Vill-Noor Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Bankey Bihari
Infrahome (P) Ltd. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015
wherein the committee observed that the project report has not been received by the
committee members yet and the matter was deferred till next meeting with a instruction to
proponent to communicate the reports to all members. The matter was again schedule for
SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Soumen Joarder, authorized representative of the
project proponent along with their consultant M/s Ascenso Management And Consulting
Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation
made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project at Khasra No-
962M, Vill-Noor Nagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project are as follows:
Name and Location of the Project Group Housing Project at Khasra No-962 M, Village
Noor Nagar, District- Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Developers of the project M/s. Bankey Bihari Infrahome (P) Ltd.
Total Plot Area 8,379.4 m
2
Built-up Area(Proposed FAR + Basement area +
Services area) 39,100.00 m
2
Total Water Consumption 145 KLD
Total Freshwater Requirement 104 KLD
Power Requirement 1,596 KVA Source: PVVNL
Power Backup 3 DG Sets of total capacity of 995 KVA
(1x380+1x200+1x415 KVA)
Total Parking provided 475 ECS
Solid Waste to be Generated 782.85 kg/day
No. of RWH Pits 2 pits
Height of the Tallest Building 55 m
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 7 of 62
3. Area statement of the project is as follows:
S. No. Particulars Area in Sq.m. Percentage
1. Total Plot Area 8,379.40 ……
2. Area for road widening 509.70 6.08% of total Plot Area
3. Net Balance plot area 7,869.70 93.9% of total Plot Area
4. Less 15% Green Area (mandatory) 1,180.50 15% of net balance plot area
5. Provided green area mandatory 1,180.50 15% of net balance plot area
6. Space left for Garbage area 33.00 ……
7. Net Plot Area 6,656.22 79.4% of total Plot Area
8. Permissible Ground Coverage 2,662.49 40% of Net Plot area
9. Achieved Ground Coverage 1,728.90 25.97% of Net plot area
10. Permissible FAR 26,624.88 400% of Net plot area
11. Proposed FAR
• Residential FAR
• Convenient FAR
• Community FAR
26,071.86
25,868.91
75.00
127.95
391.6% of Net plot area
99.2% of Proposed FAR
0.28% of Proposed FAR
0.49% of Proposed FAR
12. Total Basement Area
• Upper Basement Area
• Lower Basement Area
10,699.54
5,349.77
5,349.77
160.16% of Net Plot Area
50 % of Total Basement Area
50% of Total Basement Area
13. Stilt Area 1,525.97 22.92% of Net Plot Area
14. Service Area (Mumty, Machine Room&
Staircase) 803.31 ----
15. Built up Area (Proposed FAR+ Total
Basement Area + Stilt + Services Area) 39,100.68 ----
4. Details of building blocks are as follows:
S. No. Type of Building Storey
1. Block A 2 Basement+ Stilt+15
2. Block B 2 Basement+ Stilt+16
3. Block C 2 Basement+ Stilt+15
4. Convenient Shops 4 Nos. (in Block –A)
5. Community Area in Block –B
(on Ground Floor)
5. Water requirement of the project is as follows:
S.
N.
Description Population /
Area
Unit water
consumption
(liters)
Total water
required
(KLD)
Water
requirement
for Domestic
Use (KLD)
Flushing
Water
(KLD)
A Residential
Population
1548 86 133.12 100.62 32.50
B Visitor 155 15 2.3 0.93 1.39
C Community
Population
110 15 1.65 0.66 0.99
D Horticulture
(1180.5 m2
)
--- 1 liter 1.18 --- ---
E DG Set Cooling
(995 KVA)
--- 0.9 kVA/h 5.37 --- ---
G Fire Fighting Tank -- 1% of total
Water
requirement
1.4 -- --
Total 145.05
Says
145 KLD
102.21
Says
102 KLD
34.89
Says
35 KLD
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 8 of 62
6. Waste water details of the project is as follows:
Details Water (KLD) Water requirement for domestic purpose 102
Wastewater to be generated from domestic use (@ 80% of domestic water requirement) 81.6
Water requirement for Flushing Purpose 35
Wastewater to be generated from Flushing (@ 100% of flushing requirement) 35
Total Wastewater generated 117 KLD
7. A sewage treatment plant with 150 KLD capacity based on FAB technology is
proposed.
8. Solid waste generation details of the project is as follows:
S. N. Category of Solid Waste Waste Generation Occupancy Waste generated 1. Residential 0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 1,703 766.35
2. Community Area 0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 110 16.5
Total waste generated 782.85 kg/day
8. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the proponent to submit following
information:
1- Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding ownership.
2- Block wise/floor wise area details.
3- Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal sewer/drain.
4- Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental management facilities should be submitted. The same should be mentioned in
customer brochure also. 5- A 03 m peripheral green belt shall be left all along the periphery and shall not be
encroached for any other purposes. Plan for the same should be submitted. 6- 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan for the
same should be submitted.
7- Copy of structure design by qualified engineers.
8- All services plan.
9- Alstonia should be added in list of trees.
10- Plan for use of reflecting paints.
11- Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with Rs. 2.50 crore along with
budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.
The Committee decided to issue Environmental Clearance conditionally to submit all information required.
4- Group Housing Project “Sparsh” at Plot No-GH-02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida,
U.P. M/s Enchant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Sri Mradul Srivastava, B-11, Sector-
1, Noida, U.P. File No. 2341/ AD-H
The committee noted that M/s Enchant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. submitted an undated
application for environmental clearance for Group Housing Project “Sparsh” at Plot No-GH-
02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Enchant Infrastructure Private, received in the
Directorate on 28/05/2014. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
31/01/2015 wherein the committee observed that the project report has not been received by
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 9 of 62
Members and the project proponent was directed to communicate the project report to all
Members. The matter was again listed for SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Sanjeev Mahendra, authorized representative of
project proponent along with their consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The
proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the
committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Sparsh” at Plot
No-GH-02D, Sector-12, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Enchant Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Project
Name “Sparsh” Group Housing Project at Sector 12, Greater Noida, UP
Land
Requirement Plot Area
Built-up Area
Remarks
12500 m2 or 3.08
acre
69421 m2 The land is in possession of Proponent. The
land for the proposed project was purchased
in 2012. Lease Agreement
Water
Requirement
Phases Fresh Water in KLD Treated Water in KLD Total Water in
KLD
Construction 4.2 117.5 121.7
Operation 131.5 191.3 323
STP Capacity-270 KLD Based on FAB (Fluidised Aerobic Bio Reactor)Technology
Power
Requirement
Phases Power
Requirement
Source Back-up power supply
Constructio
n
150 kVA
(120 kw)
UP Power Corporation
Ltd.
Back-up of 150 kVA will be
provided by one DG set
Operation 2300 kVA
(1910 kw)
UP Power Corporation
Ltd.
Back-up will be provided by one 2
nos. of DG sets of 750 kva as
working and 1 no. DG set of 500
kVA as standby
Rain Water Harvesting Pits 03 Pits
Parking proposed 534 ECS
3. Area details of the project is as follows:
Category Area (Acre) Area (m
2
) Area (%)
Ground Coverage 0.78 2728.84 21.83
Open Area 1.14 4631.5 37.05
Green area 1.15 4675.3 37.4
Commercial 0.1 435.8 3.5
Meter Room 0.002 9 0.07
Security Room 0.004 19.8 0.15
Total Area 3.08 12500 100
Tower F.A.R Area m2
No. of Dwelling Units No of Floors No. of Basement
A 5589.5 58 G+14 2
F
B 7194.3 94 G+15 2
E
C 8996.5 140 G+17 2
D
Proposed Commercial FAR = 151.15
m2
Meter Room F.A.R =
9 m2
Total Population = 2754
Total F.A.R Area = 43,721.2 m2
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 10 of 62
4. Water requirement details of the project is as follows:
Sl.
No. Description No. of
person Per capita
consumption (LPCD) LPD Total water
requirement
(KLD)
Source
Fresh
water
Treated
Water
A Residential occupants 2754 65 21 236844 236.80
GNDA
& STP B Visitors 275 5 10 4125 4.10
C Service Staff 50 65 21 4300 4.30
D Kitchen and Pantry 10000 10
E Commercial 50 15 30 2250 2.25
F Landscaping - - - 4675 4.67 STP
G Road washing/ Road
side tree watering
- - - 59700 59.79
Subtotal (A+B+C+D+E+F+G) 323
Total Requirement 323 KLD
5. Waste water details of the project is as follows:
Sl.
No. Description Total
Population Fresh
Water
Requirement
(KLD)
Treated
Water
Requirement
(KLD)
Flow
to
sewer
(KLD)
Sewage
Treatment
Plant
a Residential Occupants 2754 115.6 121.1 195.1 270 KLD
Capacity
Based on FAB
Technology
b Visitors 275 1.4 2.75 3.5
c Maintenance Staff 50 3.25 1.05 3.54
d Commercial 50 0.75 1.5 1.95
e Kitchen & Pantry - 10 - 8
f Landscaping - - 4.67 0
g Road Washing / Road Side
Tree Watering
- - 59.7 0
Sub Total 131 190.86 212.09
6. Solid waste generation details of the project is as follows:
Type of waste Quantity
Municipal wastes@ 0.2 kg/capita/day 550 kg/day
Horticultural wastes@ 0.004 kg/m2/day 17.6 kg/day
Street sweepings@ 0.1 kg/capita/day 275.4 kg/day
7. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Land allotment letter.
2. Environmental sensitivity in 10 KM area.
3. Copy of all sanctioned map
4. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its
percentage of total area.
5. Tower/block wise area details.
6. Submit the details of area chart.
7. All services plans.
8. Submit the copy of letter as applied to Noida Development. AUTH. for source of
water supply.
9. Details of surface parking along with road width and movement plan is to be
submitted.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 11 of 62
10. Structure design to be submitted
11. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with Rs. 2.50 crore along with
budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and
submitted.
12. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan
for the same should be submitted.
13. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding
ownership.
14. Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal
sewer/drain.
15. Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental
management facilitates.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
5- Group Housing Project “Ashwaryam” at Sector-16C Noida Extension, U.P. M/s
Wall Rock Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Sri R.K.Gupta, Director, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad.
File No. 2342/ DD-DS
The committee noted that M/s Wall Rock Infratech Pvt. Ltd. submitted an un dated
application for environmental clearance for Group Housing Project “Ashwaryam” at Sector-
16C Noida Extension, U.P. received in the Directorate on dated 28/05/2014. The matter was
earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015 wherein the committee observed that
the project report has not been received by the committee members yet and the matter was
deferred till next meeting with a instruction to proponent to communicate the reports to all
members. The matter was again schedule for SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri R.K. Gupta, Managing Director along with their
consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The proponent, through the documents
submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Ashwaryam” at
Sector-16C Noida Extension, U.P. M/s Wall Rock Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Project Name Group Housing Project Aishwaryam, Sector 16, Noida Extension
Land Requirement Plot Area
Built-up Area
Remarks
10010 m2
or 2.47 acre
55366.10 m
2
FAR area + Facility area =
40273.21 m2
Basement area = 15092.89 m2
The land is a Sub-lease land. The
land for the proposed project was Sub-leased in 2012. Lease
Document
Water Requirement Phases Fresh Water in
KLD
Treated Water in KLD Total Water in KLD
Construction 4.20 93.56 97.76
Operation 96.65 148 244.6
STP Capacity-200 KLD, MBBR technology based.
Power Requirement 1600 KVA power will be supplied by UPPCL and back-up power will be provided by
3 DG sets of 600 kVA .
Parking Provided 530 ECS
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 12 of 62
3. Water requirement details of the project is as follows:
S.
NO.
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY
(LPCD)
POPULATION/
AREA
FRESH
WATER
(KLD)
TREATED
WATER
(KLD)
WATER
REQUIREMENT
(KLD)
A Domestic Activities
1 Drinking 7 2180 15.26 0 15.26
2 Bathing 20 2180 43.6 0 43.6
3 Flushing 21 2180 0 45.78 45.78
4 Washing 15 2180 32.7 0 32.7
5 Miscellaneous 23 2180 0 50.14 50.14
SUB-TOTAL -A (1+2+3+4+5) 91.56 95.92 187.48
B VISITORS
1 Flushing 5 218 - 1.09 1.09
2 Miscellaneous 10 218 2.18 - 2.18
SUB-TOTAL (B) - - 2.18 1.09 3.27
C COMMERCIAL
1 Flushing 30 50 - 1.5 1.5
2 Miscellaneous 15 50 0.75 - 0.75
SUB-TOTAL (C) - - 0.75 1.5 2.25
D SERVICE STAFF
1 Flushing 65 50 - 3.25 3.25
2 Miscellaneous 21 50 1.05 - 1.05
SUB-TOTAL (D) - - 1.05 3.25 4.3
E HORTICULTURE Area (m
2
) 2491
- 2.49 2.49
F ROAD WASHING
& PLANTATION
- -
- 44.86 44.86
SUB-TOTAL (E+F) - 47.35 47.35
Total Water Demand in KLD 95.54 149.11 244.65
4. Waste water generation details of the project is as follows PARAMETERS UNIT WATER
CONSUMPTION
(KLD)
WASTEWATER GENERATION (KLD)
STP (20%
EXCESS) FRESH TREATED FRESH TREATED TOTAL
80% 95%
Drinking water KLD 15.26 0 12.2 0 12.2 MBBR Technology
STP of
198.36 KL
(Say 200
KL)
Bathing KLD 43.6 0 34.9 0 34.9
Flushing KLD 0 45.78 0 43.5 43.5
Washing KLD 32.7 0 26.16 0 26.2
Misc KLD 0 50.14 0 47.6 47.6
Visitors KLD 1.09 2.18 0.87 2.1 2.9
Commercial KLD 0.75 1.5 0.6 1.4 2.0
Service staff KLD 3.25 1.05 2.6 1.00 3.6
Total in KLD 96.65 100.65 77.32 95.61 172.9
5. Solid waste generation details is as follows:
Municipal solid waste @ 0.2 kg/capita/day 436.0 kg/day
Horticultural waste @ 0.004 kg/m2
/day 160.88 kg/day
Street sweeping @ 0.1 kg/capita/day 218.0 kg/day
6. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as amended.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Land allotment letter.
2. Environmental sensitivity in 10 KM area.
3. Copy of all sanctioned map
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 13 of 62
4. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its
percentage of total area.
5. Tower/block wise area details.
6. All services plans.
7. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with 2.50 crore along
with budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and
submitted.
8. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan
for the same should be submitted.
9. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding
ownership.
10. Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal
sewer/drain.
11. Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental
management facilitates.
12. Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been
permitted.
13. Width of internal roads should be according to length of junction to junction.
It should be corrected accordingly.
14. Land use of the proposed site should be as per proposed activity. Submit the
related papers.
15. Approach road width to be shown.
16. All the documents presented in the meeting should be duly sign by the
Proponent.
17. Structure design to be submitted.
18. Land scape plan to be submitted with list of trees. 03 metre green to be
provided all side of the proposed site.
19. Copy of NOC from fire fighting is to be submitted.
20. Map of surface parking to be submitted.
21. NOC from Air Port Authority to be submitted.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
6- Commercial Project “The Correnthum” at Plot No-A-41, Sector-62, Noida, U.P.
M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd., Sri Sandeep Sahni, , Ground Floor, Plot N0-A-41,
Sector-62, Noida. File No. 2343/ AD-VB
The committee noted that M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd. submitted an undated
application for environmental clearance for Commercial Project “The Correnthum” at Plot
No-A-41, Sector-62, Noida, U.P. M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd. received in the Directorate on
28/05/2014. The matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015 wherein
the committee observed that the project report has not been received by the committee
members yet and the matter was deferred till next meeting with a instruction to proponent to
communicate the reports to all members. The matter was again schedule for SEAC meeting
dated 21/02/2015.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 14 of 62
A presentation was made by Shri Bimal Kachroo, authorized representative of the
project proponent along with their consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The
proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the
committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Commercial Project “The Correnthum” at
Plot No-A-41, Sector-62, Noida, U.P. M/s Shyam Burlap Co. Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Project Name “The Corenthum” Office Complex, Sector 62, NOIDA
Land Requirement Plot Area Built-up Area
20,000 m2
or 4.94 acre
Existing Proposed
50193.45m2
48839.63m2
Water
Requirement
Phases Fresh Water in
KLD
Treated Water in
KLD
Total Water in KLD
Construction 4.20 87.52 91.72
Operation 33.0 109 142.0
STP Capacity-150 KLD, based on Package type Technology
Power
Requirement
5522 KVA power will be be supplied by UP Power Corporation and back-up power
will be provided by 5 nos. of DG sets of 1000 kva as working and 1 no. DG set of 500
kva as standby.
Proposed Parking 1240 ECS
Rain waster harvesting pits
04 Pits
3. Area details of the project is as follows: Category Existing area for (Tower
A & B) m2
Proposed area for
(Tower C) m2
Total Area in m2
Ground Coverage 5,124.62 638.99 5,763.61
Landscape 7,159.02 0 7,159.02
Open area, Road area, Paved area 7583.5 -638.99 6944.51
Guard room 25 0 25
Machine room 105 0 105
Total Plot Area 20,000 20,000 20,000
4. Water requirement of the project is as follows: S.
No.
Description Unit Quantity Population/Area Fresh
water
(KLD)
Treated
Water
(KLD)
Water
Requirement
(KLD)
A DOMESTIC ACTIVITIES
1 Drinking use LPCD 7 4000 28 0 28
2 Bathing use LPCD 0 4000 0 0 0
3 Flushing use LPCD 21 4000 0 84 84
4 Washing use LPCD 0 4000 0 0 0
5 Miscellaneous LPCD 4 4000 0 16 16
Subtotal (1+2+3+4+5) 28 100 128
B VISITORS
1. Flushing LPCD 10 210 2.1 0 2.10
2. Miscellaneous LPCD 5 210 0 1.05 1.05
SUB-TOTAL (B) - - 2.1 1.05 3.15
C MAINTENANCE STAFF
1 Flushing LPCD 65 40 2.6 0 2.60
2 Miscellaneous LPCD 21 40 0 0.84 0.84
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 15 of 62
SUB-TOTAL (C) - - 2.6 0.84 3.44
D Horticulture LS 1L/m
2
7159.02 0 7.15 7.15
Total Water Demand in KLD (A+B+C+D) 33 109 142
5. Waste water generation details of the project is as follows: S.
No.
Description Total
Population
Fresh water
requirement(KLD)
Treated Water
(KLD)
Flow to
sewer
(KLD)
Sewerage
Treatment
Plant
a. Office
Occupants
4000 28 84 102.2 150 KLD
package
type
technology
based STP
b. Visitors 210 2.1 1.05 2.67
c. Staff 40 2.6 0.84 2.87
d. Misc 4000 - 16 12.8
e. Gardening 1L/m
2
- 7.15 0
Sub Total 33 109 121
6. Solid waste generation details is as follows: Description Proposed Quantity
Municipal solid waste @ 0.2 kg/capita/day 850 kg/day
Horticultural waste @ 0.004 kg/m2
/day 71.76 kg/day
Street sweeping@ 0.1 kg/capita/day 425 kg/day
7. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Land allotment letter.
2. Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been permitted.
Revised proposals as per correct FAR should be submitted. 3. Copy of all sanctioned maps.
4. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its percentage of total area.
5. Tower/block wise area details. 6. All services plans.
7. 2% Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.
8. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan for the
same should be submitted.
9. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding ownership.
10. Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal
sewer/drain.
11. Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental
management facilitates.
12. Width of internal roads should be according to length of junction to junction. It should
be corrected accordingly.
13. Land use of the proposed site should be as per proposed activity. Submit the related
papers.
14. Affidavit to be submitted regarding no construction work done.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 16 of 62
7- Office Complex Project “IT cum ITES Centre” at plot no. 1C, Sector-142, Noida,
U.P. M/s Express Infoways Pvt. Ltd. Sri K L Suneja, Director, 21-A, Tughlak Road,
New Delhi. File No. 2352/ DD-Y
The committee noted that M/s Express Infoways Pvt. Ltd. submitted an undated
application for environmental clearance of Office Complex Project “IT cum ITES Centre” at
plot no. 1C, Sector-142, Noida, U.P. received in the Directorate on 30/05/2014. The matter
was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 31/01/2015 wherein the committee observed
that the project report has not been received by the committee members yet and the matter
was deferred till next meeting with a instruction to proponent to communicate the reports to
all members. The matter was again scheduled for SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Amar Singh, authorized representative of project
proponent along with their consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The proponent,
through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Office Complex Project “IT cum ITES
Centre” at plot no. 1C, Sector-142, Noida, U.P. M/s Express Infoways Pvt. Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Project Name IT Cum ITeS Centre, Plot No. 1C, Sector-142, Noida, Uttar Pradesh
Land Requirement Plot Area Built-up Area Remarks
16188 m2
or 4.0 acre
59816 m2
The project was granted E.C in
October 2007 and now it is going
for the renewal of the same.
Water Requirement Phases Fresh Water in
KLD
Treated Water in
KLD
Total Water in KLD
Constructi
on
9.75 104.49 114.24
Operation 55.11 73.70 128.81
STP Capacity-70 KLD, MBBR technology based.
Power Requirement 1278 KW power will be be supplied by UPPCL and back-up power will be provided
by 2 DG set of 1000 kVA as working and 1 DG set of 750 kVA as standby.
Rain water
harvesting
04 Pits
Proposed Parking 762 ECS
3. Area details of the project is as follows:
CATEGORY AREA (ACRE) AREA (M
2
) AREA (%)
Ground Coverage 1.2 4856.4 30
Guard & Metre Room 0.004 30 0.18
Green area 2.04 8256.18 51.0
Road & Ramp Area 0.75 3045.46 18.82
Total Plot Area 4.0 16188 100
4. Water requirement of the project is as follows:
Sl.
No. Description Unit Quantity Population/Area Fresh
water (KLD)
Treated
Water (KLD)
Water
Requirement (KLD)
A OFFICE OCCUPANTS
1 Flushing LPCD 12 1150 0 13.8 13.8
2 Miscellaneous LPCD 20 1150 23 0 23
SUB-TOTAL (A) - - 23 13.8 36.8
B VISITORS
1 Flushing LPCD 6 40 0 0.24 0.24
2 Miscellaneous LPCD 9 40 0.36 0 0.36
SUB-TOTAL (B) - - 0.36 0.24 0.6
C MAINTENANCE STAFF
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 17 of 62
1 Flushing LPCD 20 70 0 1.4 1.4
2 Miscellaneous LPCD 25 70 1.75 0 1.75
SUB-TOTAL (C) - - 1.75 1.4 3.15
D Water Bodies
make-up and
filter back
wash
LS - - 10 - 10
E Cafeteria LS - - 20 - 20
SUB-TOTAL (D+E) - - 30 - 30
F Cooling
Tower
Ltrs - - 20 20
G Road Side
Washing
Ltrs 30 30
H Irrigation Ltrs 1 8256.18 0 8.26 8.26
SUB-TOTAL (F+G+H) - 58.26 58.26
Total Water Demand in KLD 55.11 73.70 128.81
5. Waste water generation details of the project is as follows:
PARAMETERS UNIT WATER
CONSUMPTION WASTEWATER
GENERATION STP (20%
EXCESS)
(KLD) (KLD)
FRESH TREATED FRESH TREATED TOTAL
80% 95%
Office Occupants KLD 23 13.8 18.4 13.11 31.51 STP of 70
KLD is
Proposed
(MBBR
Technology)
Visitors KLD 0.45 0.3 0.36 0.285 0.645
Maintenance Staff KLD 1.75 1.4 1.4 1.33 2.73
Water Bodies make
up and filter back
wash
KLD 10 0 8 0 8
Cafeteria KLD 20 0 16 0 16
Total in KLD 55.2 15.5 44.16 14.725 58.885
6. Solid waste generation details of the project is as follos:
Description Quantity
Municipal solid waste @ 0.2 kg/capita/day 230.0 kg/day
Horticultural waste @ 0.004 kg/m2
/day 64.75 kg/day
Street sweeping @ 0.1 kg/capita/day 115.0 kg/day
7. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Land allotment letter.
2. Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been
permitted. Revised proposals as per correct FAR should be submitted.
3. Copy of all sanctioned maps.
4. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its
percentage of total area.
5. Tower/block wise area details.
6. All services plans.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 18 of 62
7. 2% Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary
provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.
8. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan
for the same should be submitted.
9. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding
ownership.
10. Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal
sewer/drain.
11. Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental
management facilitates.
12. Width of internal roads should be according to length of junction to junction.
It should be corrected accordingly.
13. Land use of the proposed site should be as per proposed activity. Submit the
related papers.
14. Okhla Bird Sanctuary mentioned to be at 10.5 KM. Verification from
competent authority should be submitted in this regard.
15. Management plan for proposed earth excavation from the project.
16. NOC from for fore, Air port Auth. to be submitted.
17. Affidavit regarding no construction done to be submitted.
18. Area details to be submitted.
19. Management of excavated soil.
20. Plan for use of reflecting paints on roof top and side walls.
21. Structure design to be submitted.
22. NOC from Air port Authority to be submitted.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
8- Rama-Eesh Charitable Trust, Plot No-3, Knowledge Park-I, Greater Noida, U.P. Dri
R C Sharma, Chairman, Rama-Eesh Charitable Trust. File No. 2353/ AD-Sub.
The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the
case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project
proponent.
9- Group Housing Project at Plot No. GH-6B, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Raj
Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Sri R C Goel, Director,M-33, 2nd Floor, Greater Kailash-
1, New Delhi File No. 2358/ OSD-T
The committee noted that M/s Raj Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd. submitted an application
for environmental clearance of Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-6B, Sector-1, Greater
Noida, U.P. M/s Raj Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd. received in the Directorate on 03/06/2014.
A presentation was made by Shri Sukhveer Singh Bhati, authorized representative
along with their consultant M/s Paramars, Lucknow. The proponent, through the documents
submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 19 of 62
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-6B,
Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Raj Hans Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
2. Area details of the project is as follows:
Items Proposed Area (sq m) As per State Byelaws (sq m)
Total plot area 20034.8
Ground Coverage 5441.011(27.16%) 7012.18 (35%)
FAR 70095.552 (3.49) 70121.8 (3.5)
Basic – 2.75 (approved)
Purchasable – 0.75 (applied)
Non-FAR Area on Floors 8540.746
Services on surface
• Machine Room
• Guard Room
• Open
Transformer
• DG Room
760.322
531.322
18.00
99.00
112.00
Stilt under tower & podium 12413.714
Basement 16611.053
Total Built up area 108421.387
Open Area including road 14593.789 @72.8% of total plot area
Landscape Area 7391.162 @50.65% of open area and
@36.89% of total plot area
Proposed activities Residential towers, convenience
shops, children play ground, 24hrs water supply, Generator back up for
common amenities, Landscaped
garden
Height of the Building 57 m (S + 18)
Rain water harvesting pits 04 Pits
3. Block wise details are as follows:
Residential Units Description Set Back
Residential
Towers
Block - A 72 Stilt + 18 Floors 15 m
Block - B 68 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m
Block - C 68 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m
Block - D 68 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m
Block - E 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m
Block - F 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m
Block - G 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m
Block - H 102 Stilt + 17 Floors 9 m
Block - I 72 Stilt + 18 Floors 9 m
Block - J 72 Stilt + 18 Floors 15 m
828 housing units
4. Water requirement of the project is as follows:
Description Total
Occupancy
Rate of water
demand (lpcd)
Total
Fresh
Water
(KLD)
Total
Flushing/Recycled
water (KLD)
Total
Water
(KLD)
Residential 4140 Fresh Water @ 65
LPCD Flushing
Water @ 21 LPCD
269 87 356
Visitors (10%) 414 Fresh Water @ 5
LPCD
Flushing Water @
10 LPCD
2 4 6
Staff 207 Fresh Water @ 30
LPCD
Flushing Water @
6 3 9
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 20 of 62
15 LPCD
Landscape
development
7391.16 sqm 1 l/sqm 7.4 7.4
Cooling water for
DG set
2020 kVA 0.9 l/kVA/Hr 14.54 14.54
Total water 277 115.94
~116
392.94
~393
Water/ Waste water Details
Fresh water 277 KLD
Domestic Flushing water 116 KLD
Horticulture / Landscape 7.4 ~ 8 KLD
Cooling water for DG set 14.54 ~ 15 KLD
Total water requirement 393 KLD
Waste water 314 KLD
STP Capacity 380 KLD (20% extra)
Water Source Municipal water supply
STP sludge 79 kg/day
5. Parking details are as follows:
PARKING PROPOSED
Parking Space & Norms Total Area Area available for parking Total ECS
Podium + Stilt Parking @ 28 ECS 11655.063 465 ECS
14871.196 416 ECS
Total Parking 881 ECS
6. Solid waste generation details are as follos:
S. No. Category Occupancy Per Capita Generation
(kg/day)
Waste
generated (kg/day)
1 Residents 4140 0.50 2070
2 Staff 207 0.25 51.75
3 Visitors 414 0.15 62.1
4 Landscape waste 1.82 acres @ 0.2 kg/acre/day 0.364
TOTAL SOLID WASTE GENERATED 2184.214 ~ 2184
STP Sludge 79
E-waste (<1kg/capita/year) 12
7. Power requirement and backup details are as follows:
Power requirement 2800 kVA
Source of power and supply capacity Noida Power Company Ltd.
Backup power supply arrangement 2 x 1010 kVA
Location of Generator sets At Substation
Stack Height 7.0 m + Highest Building Height
8. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee noted that approved FAR for the project is 2.75 whereas a purchasable
FAR of 0.75 is applied to GNIDA which is not yet approved. However, the project proposals have been prepared on the basis of 3.5 FAR. The committee discussed the matter and
deliberated that appraisal shall be made only on the approved FAR. The project proponents were directed to submit the proposals on the basis of approved FAR. Shri Bhati, authorized
representative of project proponent submitted that it is already 08 months since the submission of the application and requested for early disposal of the matter, the committee
deliberated that the matter may be included in the agenda of next meeting if the revised proposals as above be submitted.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 21 of 62
10. Mirza International Ltd. (Tannery Division) at Village- Magarwara, Unnao. Sri
R.D. Kaushik, 14/6, Civil Lines Kanpur. File No. 1731/ DD-Y
The committee noted that the matter was discussed in joint meeting of SEIAA and
SEAC held on 12/01/2015 wherein following decision was taken:
"It was decided that such projects should be considered as category ‘A’ project and
the exemption should only be considered for projects proposed in Industrial estates
approved by concerned authorities as prescribed in the E.I.A. notification which
clarifies through OM no. J-11013/36/2014-IA-I dated 16-05-2014 that:-
"The expression ‘concerned authorities’ as stated in the aforesaid para of EIA
notification 2006, implies the competent authorities in the State Government/Central
Government, which approve setting up of such Industrial estates or parks. All other
cases as category A should be referred to the Government of India."
The issue of inclusion of industrial land use demarcated in the master plan as eligible
for exemption was also discussed and it was decided that master plan regulations are
for demarcating land uses with or without development as an industrial area/estate and
therefore merely being an Industrial zone in the master plan will not qualify it for
exemption unless it is also an industrial estate as in the EIA notification as above."
The project proponent submitted a letter dated 12/01/2015 received in the Directorate
on 15/01/2015 regarding the matter through which they have submitted certificate from
Public Information Officer, Unnao Shuklaganj Development Authority and letter dated
03/06/1989 of Joint Secretary, Awas Anubhag-3, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh. Alongwith the
same, map of Unnao Shuklaganj Mahayojna have also been submitted wherein land use of
location of Mirza International Ltd., Unnao has been indicated as "Light Industry".
The committee discussed the matter in the light of EIA Notification, 2006 wherein it
has been provisioned that tannery projects outside the notified industrial area shall be treated
as category-A and environmental clearance for them shall be granted by MoEF, Govt. of
India. The committee also discussed the documents submitted by the project proponent and
deliberated that a communication should be made to Industrial Development Department,
Govt. of U.P. to confirm that whether Unnao Shuklaganj Development Authority is
competent to declare Magarwara Unnao as notified industrial area (where M/s Mirza
International Ltd. is situated.). The communication should also include the related documents
submitted by proponent to get comment of Industrial Development Department regarding its
location. A copy of this communication should be endorsed to project proponent also.
The matter shall be discussed after receipt of information from Industrial
Development Department in this regards.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 22 of 62
11- Raw Leather to Finish Leather Having Capacity (8000 Kg/day) M/s Omega
International Unit-III, G-07-08-09-10, Unnao Industrial Estate, Site-II, Unnao,. File
No. 1721/ DD-Y
The committee noted that the terms of reference in the matter were issued through
letter dated 11/10/2013. The final EIA was submitted by the project proponent through letter
dated 08/08/2014. The matter was earlier scheduled for SEAC meeting dated 15/11/2014
wherein the project proponent did not appear. The matter was again scheduled for SEAC
meeting dated 21/02/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Mayank Nigam, authorized representative along
with their consultant Shri Hari Om Sharan Dwivedi. The proponent, through the documents
submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for tannery unit M/s Omega International Unit-
III, at G-07-08-09-10, Unnao Industrial Estate, Site-II, Unnao, U.P.
2. Size of the project is proposed as 80000 kg/day Raw Leather to Finish Leather
Having.
3. The project details are as follows:
Feature Description
Site Plot No – G-07-08-09-10, Unnao Industrial Eastate, Site-II,
Unnao-209 801.
Latitude
Longitudes
26°33'55"N
80°32'14”E
Total area acquired
Existing Plant
Proposed Plant
1 Acres (Approx)
Nill
1 Acre (Approx)
No Additional Land is required for Expansion
Type of Land Non Agricultural land (Industrial Estate)
Nearest Port Nil
Nearest Highway State Highway ( Kanpur, Lucknow) 600 M.
Nearest Railway Station Unnao (6 km)
Nearest Airport Lucknow (45 KM)
Nearest Reserved Forest None within 10 km Radius
4. Land use details are as follows:
Land Use Total area (SQM) % of Total Plot
Area under plots 4180
Road and Parking area 540 13
Common Facilities plant and
machinery
1640 40
Green Spaces 1400 34
ETP, Salt recovery and chrome
recovery unit
520 12
Basement nill
5. Raw material details are as follows:
Sr. No. Name of Raw Material Daily Capacity
01 Raw Hide 8000 Kg
02 Sodium Format 75kg/day
03 BCS 375kg/day
04 Synthetic Tanning Agents 750kg/day
06 . Fat Liquors 500 kg/day
07 Dyes 100kgs/day
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 23 of 62
08 Binders 150kgs/day
09 Pigments 15 kg/day
10 Top coats 150kg/day
11 Wax Emulsions 20kg/day
12 Feel Modifiers 7/5 kg/day
6. 04 nos. rain water harvesting is proposed for the project.
7. Solid waste generation details are as follows:
Sr. No. Type of Waste Quantity Generation
(MT/Month)
Utilization / Disposal Plan
1. Coal Ash (Generated through
Boiler)
2 - 3 Utilization for as per fly ash rule.
2. ETP sludge 4 - 5 Dispose through TSDF site.
3. Used Oil
(Generated through stand by
DG set)
50 liter/Month Partial used in Boiler and partial sell to
register recycler.
4. Small pieces of leather 2-3 • Smaller particle (saver dust) will sell to feeder and fertilizer
industry.
• Bigger part will sell to end user.
8. The project is covered under category 4"f" of EIA notification, 2006.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Approved building plan.
2. NOC granted by UPPCB.
3. Status on air monitoring as per NAAQS standards dated 16/11/2009.
Monitoring data of H2S.
4. Proposal of raw material storage.
5. All services/ environmental facilities should be earmarked on plan layout.
6. OHT to be proposed in rear setback. Plan for same should be submitted.
7. Proposal of diffusers in aeration process.
8. Projection about emission level in operational phase of proposed project.
9. Route map of drain where discharge of tanneries effluent is proposed.
10. Costing of proposed Environmental Management Facilities in the industry.
11. Details of the pollution load at the intermediate and the ultimate discharge
points with flow diagram should be furnished. Scheme for the reduction in
TDS as per the norms of CPCB should be detailed separately with calculation
sheet.
The committee also directed to get a status report regarding construction at site
as required from Member Secretary, UPPCB vide letter dated 26/05/2014 of SEAC.
12- Group Housing “Grand City” at Plot No-04/B.S.-1&5, Sidharth Vihar, Ghaziabad.
Sri Rajesh Agrawal, File No. 2390/ AD-H
The committee noted that the environmental clearance in the matter has already been
issued. However, due to non-updation of status at Secretariat Computer Section, the project
got listed again inadvertently. The committee directed to update the status and delist the matter
from the agenda of the SEAC meeting dated 21/02/2015.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 24 of 62
13- Group Housing Project “Golf Vista”, No-3, Sector-M, Sushant City Extension,
Lucknow, U.P. File No. 2242/ DD-Sh.
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
13/12/2014 for grant of Terms of Reference, wherein the project proponents were directed
to submit information. The project proponent submitted their information through letter dated 24/12/2014 received in the Directorate on 02/01/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Vinod Tikku, Executive Director along with their
consultant M/s Minmec Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents
submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Golf Vista”, No-3,
Sector-M, Sushant City Extension, Lucknow, U.P. M/s Ansal Properties And
Infrastructure Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Project Feature Description
Type of Project “Golf Vista” Group Housing (residential building)
Location GH no. 3, Sector-M, Sushant Golf Hi-Tech City (extension area),
Lucknow
Project Proponent M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.
Category of Project Category B, Sl. No. 8(b)
Total Site Area 64,218.54 sq.m. or 15.86 acres
Net Plot Area planned same as above
Ground Coverage Achieved - 7822.436 sq.m. (12.18%)
Permissible - 22,476.49 sq.m. (35% of plot area)
Built-up Area 1,76,460.022 sq.m.
FAR Achieved - 147455.17 sq.m. (@2.75)
Permissible - @2.75
No. of towers 12
No. of floors S+19-24
Maximum height of tallest tower 79.7
No. of Dwelling units 1049
Population 5769 (Residential 5245 + floating 524)
Parking (nos. of ECS) Required = 1.25 cars/unit i.e. 1311; Provided = 1369
Parking location (a) surface = 787; (b) stilt = 134; (c) First basement = 448
Total daily water demand 741.35 KLD (GH, green area)
Fresh water demand 487.7 KLD
Source of Water Ground water through 2 nos. tube well & treated waste water from STP Total Sewage Generation 682.89 KLD
Common STP capacity Centralised STP (23 MLD capacity) of mother city is nearest to this project & will cater to its sewage
Power Requirement 1875 KVA
Source of Power UPPCL Stand by DG sets 1 X 160 KVA and 1X240 KVA
Green area proposed 9632.78 sq. m i.e. 15% of the total plot area, in which 401 trees will be planted
Quantity of solid waste generation 3.56 TPD
Quantity of sludge from STP 0.20 tonnes/day Quantity of e-waste 10.43 kg/day
Quantity of hazardous wastes variable on DG maintenance Cutting/ filling Cutting 3500 cum & filling 2700 cum
Quantity of RW to be harvested 166.23 cum/hr (roof top)
Volume of RWH pits is proposed 14.3 cum Total no of proposed RWH pits 3 RWH structures + 1 surface water body
Depth to water table 6 mbgl
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 25 of 62
3. Water calculation details of the project is as follows:
Particulars Total
Population
Water Requirement /Person/Unit Total Water Requirement
Domestic Flushing
(treated
waste
water)
Total Domestic
(LPD)
Flushing
(LPD)
(treated
waste
water)
Total
(LPD)
Residential 5245 90 45 135 472050 236025 708075
Floating 524 15 30 45 15720 7860 23580
Sub Total 487770 243885 731655
Sub Total in KLD 487.78 243.89 731.66
Green Area (sq. m.) in KLD (treated waste water) 9.69
Total Daily Water Requirement (in KLD) 741.35
15% unaccounted for water (UFW) in KLD (emergency use, occasional leakages or
losses--> occasional demand)
110.00
Fire fighting demand [100(P)0.5
] in KLD, P- Population in Thousand (1 time requirement) in KLD (1 time requirement)
240.19
4. Solid waste generation and management details are as follows:
Sl. No. Solid waste Quantity Disposal/ Management
Construction Stage
1 Cutting 3500 2700 cum material shall be required for filling
within the project site.
2 MSW Approx 7.5 kg/d
for @50 labour
Sent to landfill site
Operation Stage
1 STP Sludge 0.20 TPD Used as manure after composting
2 Municipal Solid Waste 3.57 TPD • Segregation at source into (i) biodegradable, (ii) recyclable and (iii) non-biodegradable
categories
• Organic waste shall be utilized for preparation of manure by composting
• Recyclable material shall be sold for recycling to authorized vendors.
• The non compostable and non recyclable
material shall be put into landfill.
3 e-waste 10.43 kg/day Separate e-waste bin on project site from where
periodic evacuation by authorized vendors
(approved by CPCB).
5. The project proposals are covered under category 8"b" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the replies submitted by project proponent and
recommended following TORs and general guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding
the proposals:
Additional TORs
1. Land use approved by the competent authority.
2. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which
environment clearance is sought.
3. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and
topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with
photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 26 of 62
information.
4. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.
5. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard
electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.
6. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.
7. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting
landscape plan is to be submitted.
8. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure
covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal
of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.
9. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for
discharge.
10. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central
Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.
11. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,
should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated
water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.
12. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment
facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.
13. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between
habitation and proposed project.
14. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.
15. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.
16. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and
other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.
17. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.
18. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may
be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.
19. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their
disposal.
20. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.
21. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.
22. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the
common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all
effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.
Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.
23. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be
described.
24. Disaster management plan should be prepared.
25. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be
described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.
26. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-
laws or construction manual of the MoEF
27. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 27 of 62
clearly mentioned
28. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.
29. Use of local building materials should be described.
30. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack
details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.
31. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.
32. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources
of energy in the light of ECBC code.
33. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project
affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should
be prepared.
34. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for
Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.
35. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of
minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need
base assessment study in the study area.
36. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.
37. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of
generated waste water.
38. Project falling with in 05 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance
from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not
earmarked.
39. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management
services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water
Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.
40. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to
the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District
Magistrate of related District.
General Guidelines
a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly
attested by Public Notary, stating that:
I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is
proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for
any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project
proponent.”
II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil
construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from
getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing
has not been done, then the same may be deleted).
III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,
enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and
I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to
be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,
if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 28 of 62
IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified
under any law.
b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been
complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented
are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted
along with EIA.
c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions
indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,
and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,
so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.
d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA
notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):
Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental
attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.
e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically
mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which
this EIA is prepared.
f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm
along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.
g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated
with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through
which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly
be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th
August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.
h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.
The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be
submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the
information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA.
14- Proposed School DPS-Indrapuram Branch at Khasra No- 851,852-853, Vill-Morta,
Rajnagar Extension, Ghaziabad, U.P. File No. 2248/ AD-Sub
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
13/12/2014 wherein the project proponents were directed to submit information. The project
proponent submitted their information through letter dated 20/01/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Mahendra Pandey, authorized representative and
consultant of project proponent The proponent, through the documents submitted and the
presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Proposed Higher Secondary School, DPS,
Indrapuram Branch at Khasra No- 851, 852, 853, Vill-Morta, Rajnagar Extension,
Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Nirbhay Realtors Private Limited
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Plot area 31931 m
2
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 29 of 62
Permissible Ground Coverage 11175.85 m
2
(35%)
Proposed Ground Coverage 6163.403 m
2
(19.3 %)
Permissible FAR 38317.2 m
2
(120)
Proposed FAR 28473.091 m
2
Basement Yes
Built up area 28473.091 m
2
Green Area 16676.658 m
2
(approx. 52 % of plot area)
Population 5050 students; 350 faculty & staff
Water Consumption 320 KLD (243 KLD Domestic + 17 KLD Horticulture + 60 KLD
HVAC)
Waste water 218 KLD
STP Capacity 250 KLD
Treated Wastewater 210 KLD (160 KLD Flushing + 17 KLD Horticulture + 53 KLD
Cooling)
Electricity requirement 2000 kW
DG sets Only for emergency use, (2000 KVA + 250 KVA)
Connectivity Sector Roads, N.H. 58
Solid Waste 1080 kg/day (540 kg Organic + 324 kg recyclable + 216 kg others)
Facilities Cafeteria, medical room, Hobbies Clubs, green space, parks
Parking facility 389 cars; 20 buses on ground + 2-wheelers
Total soil excavation 24,000 m3
3. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the replies and recommended grant of environmental
clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority earlier and following specific conditions:
1. Off street parking shall be provided within the proponent land to be used for the
purpose of school vans and guardian/teacher vehicles. 2. 2% of total cost of project should be earmarked for CSR activities. A regular
compliance in this regards shall be submitted. The cost of CSR shall not be transferred on students and should be mentioned explicitly in the school brochure.
3. Provision of 100% solar lighting along the roads, parks and common places. 4. Use of reflecting paints on roof top and all side walls shall be undertaken.
5. This environmental clearance issued with respect to the environmental consideration
and it does not mean that State Level Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA)
approved the proposed land use.
6. The height, Construction built up area of proposed construction shall be in accordance
with the existing FSI/FAR norms of the urban local body & it should ensure the same
along with survey number before approving layout plan & before according
commencement certificate to proposed work. Plan approving authority should also
ensure the zoning permissibility for the proposed project as per the approved
development plan of the area.
7. All required sanitary and hygienic measures should be in place before starting
construction activities and to be maintained throughout the construction phase.
8. Project proponent shall ensure completion of STP, MSW disposal facility. green belt
development prior to occupation of the buildings. No physical occupation or allotment will be given unless all above said environmental infrastructure is installed and made
functional including water requirement.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 30 of 62
9. Provision shall be made for the housing of construction labour within the site with all
necessary infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile toilets, mobile
STP, safe drinking water, medical health care, crèche and First Aid Room etc.
10. Adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities should be provided for construction
workers at the site. Provision should be made for mobile toilets. The safe disposal of
wastewater and solid wastes generated during the construction phase should he
ensured. 11. The solid waste generated should be properly collected and segregated. dry/inert solid
waste should be disposed off to the approved sites for land filling after recovering recyclable material.
12. Wet garbage should be treated by Organic Waste Converter and treated waste (manure) should be utilized in the existing premises for gardening. And, no wet
garbage will be disposed outside the premises. Local authority should ensure this. 13. Arrangement shall be made that waste water and storm water do not get mixed.
14. All the topsoil excavated during construction activities should be stored for use in
horticulture / landscape development within the project site.
15. Additional soil for leveling of the proposed site shall be generated within the sites (to
the extent possible) so that natural drainage system of the area is protected and
improved.
16. Green Belt Development shall be carried out considering CPCB guidelines including
selection of plant species and in consultation with the local DFO/ Agriculture Dept.
17. Alstonia tree to be added in list of trees.
18. Effluents from laboratories shall be pre treated before STP upto STPs intake
standards. 19. Disposal of muck during construction phase should not create any adverse effect on
the neighboring communities and be disposed taking the necessary precautions for general safety and health aspects of people, only in approved sites with the approval
of competent authority. 20. Any hazardous waste generated during construction phase should be disposed off as
per applicable rules and norms with necessary approvals of the Maharashtra Pollution
Control Board.
21. The diesel generator sets to be used during construction phase should be low sulphur
diesel type and should conform to Environments (Protection) Rules prescribed for air
and noise emission standards.
22. Vehicles hired for bringing construction material to the site should be in good
condition and should have a pollution check certificate and should conform to
applicable air and noise emission standards and should be operated only during
nonpeak hours.
23. Ready mixed concrete must be used in building construction.
24. The approval of competent authority shall be obtained for structural safety of the buildings due to any possible earthquake, adequacy of fire fighting equipments etc. as
per National Building Code including measures from lighting. 25. The ground water level and its quality should be monitored regularly in consultation
with Ground Water Authority. 26. Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points from the roads adjoining the
proposed project site must be avoided. Parking should be fully internalized and no public space should be utilized.
27. The building should have adequate distance between them to allow movement of fresh air and passage of natural light, air and ventilation.
28. In the case of any change (s) in the scope of the project, the project would require a
fresh appraisal by this Department.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 31 of 62
29. A separate environment management cell with qualified staff shall be set up for
implementation of the stipulated environmental safeguards.
30. Separate funds shall be allocated for implementation of environmental protection
measures/EMP along with item-wise breaks-up. These cost shall be included as part
of the project cost.
15- Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd at Bhartiagram, Gajraula, Amroha File
No. 2537/ SPO-V
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated 13/12/2014 for grant of Terms of Reference, wherein the project proponents were directed
to submit information. The project proponent submitted their information through letter dated 20/01/2015 received in the Directorate on 30/01/2015.
A presentation was made by Shri Arun Kumar Arya, authorized representative along
with their consultant M/s Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the
documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd. Situated
at Bhartiagram, District-Amroha, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh.
2. Area details of the project is as follows:
Particulars Area (sq. m) Percentage (%)
Plant Area, Office Area ( all covered area) 9275 31.70
Paved Area ( Road, Corridor, Parking and drainage) 6000 20.51
Green Belt Area 9747.4 33.31
Open Area 4237.3 14.48
Total Plot area 29259.77 100
3. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Particulars Details
Project Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Ltd.
Location Bhartiagram, District-Amroha, Gajraula-244223, Uttar Pradesh
Category “B” of 5 (f) of EIA notification 2006 and its subsequent
amendments.
Total Land Area 7.23 acre or 29,259.77 sqmts (JACPL Polymer section)
Water Requirement Total Water demand will be 83 KLD (82 industrial and 1 KLD
domestic)
Source of water Water requirement for the proposed project will be sourced from
Jubilant Life science unit
Man Power Total number = 25 persons will be employed
Power Demand 3000 kW per day
Power will be sourced from Cogeneration power plant of Jubilant
Life Science Limited.
End Use Chewing gum industry; as emulsifier in beverages; also used in ink,
paint, varnish, adhesive, packaging, and other non-food items.
4. Raw material details is as follows:
S. no. Particular Quantity (TPA/TPD/kg.)
1 Gum Rosin 6000 TPA/18 TPD
2 Glycerol 700 TPA/ 2 TPD
3 TPP (Catalyst) 6 TPA/ 18 Kg/day
5. Daily fresh water demand is 83 KLD (Industrial purpose 82 KLD, Domestic purpose
01 KLD). Water demand of the industry will be sourced from Jubilant Life Science
Ltd.
6. Water from cooling tower will be in continuous loop during the process. Wastewater
generated from domestic purpose will be to the tune of 0.5 KLD, which will be
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 32 of 62
treated in the existing STP. The changes will be localized and no change in the
physical environment will be observed as zero discharge will be maintained. 7. Solid waste generation details is as follows:
S.No. Waste Description Category as per
HWMR rules
Qty generated
/Annum/day
Unit Method of
disposal
1 GI barrel waste (Metal
Scrap)
-- 600 Kg/day To be sent to
Market
2 Bag waste/ Paper waste -- 3.2 kg/ Day To be sent to
Market
3 Ethyl acetate Waste from reactor cleaning
20.2 1200 KL/annum To be sent to authorized
Recyclers
8. The project proposals are covered under category 5"f" of EIA Notification, 2006, as
amended.
The committee discussed the replies submitted by project proponent and
recommended following TORs for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:
Additional TORs 1. Executive summary of the project.
2. Project location and plant layout. 3. Promoters and their back ground.
4. Regulatory framework.
5. Base line data given needs to be elaborated.
6. Data for the stack emission, fugitive emission; water requirement and water balance
chart; waste water generation, treated effluent quality, re-utilization and disposal of
solid/hazardous waste for existing unit.
7. A map indicating location of the project and distance from severely polluted area.
8. Infrastructure facilities including power sources.
9. Total cost of the project along with total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures.
10. Project site location along with site map of 10 km area and site details providing various industries, surface water bodies, forests etc.
11. Present land use based on satellite imagery for the study area of 10 km radius. 12. Location of National Park/Wild Life Sanctuary/Reserve Forest within 05 km radius.
13. Details of the total land and break-up of the land use for green belt and other uses. 14. List of the products along with the production capacities.
15. Detailed list of raw material required and source, mode of storage and transportation.
16. Manufacturing process details along with the chemical reaction and process flow
chart.
17. Site-specific micro-metrological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly
wind speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
18. Ambient air quality monitoring at 6 locations within the study area of 5 km., aerial
coverage from project site as per NAAQES notified on 16th September, 2009.
Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction. 19. One season site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative
humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except monsoon) for PM10, SO2, NOx including HC and VOCs should be collected. The
monitoring station should take into account the pre-dominant wind direction,
population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests. Data for water and
noise monitoring should also be included.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 33 of 62
20. Air pollution control measures proposed for the effective control of gaseous emission
within permissible limits.
21. Name of all the solvents to be used in the process and details of solvent recovery
systems.
22. Design details of ETP, incinerator, boiler, scrubbers/bag filters etc.
23. Details of water and air pollution and its mitigation measures plan.
24. Action plan to control ambient air quality as per NAAQES standards notified by the Ministry on 16th September, 2009.
25. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources.
26. Water balance chart including quantity of effluent generated recycled and reused and discharged.
27. Action plan for ‘Zero’ discharge of effluent should be included. 28. Ground water quality monitoring minimum at 6 locations should be carried out.
Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area and ecological status
(Terrestrial and Aquatic).
29. The details of solid and hazardous wastes generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly related to the hazardous waste.
30. Action plan for management of fly ash generated from boiler should be included. Tie-
up or agreement with brick manufacturers to be provided.
31. Precautions to be taken during storage and transportation of hazardous chemicals
should be clearly mentioned and incorporated.
32. A copy of the Memorandum of understanding signed with cement manufacturing
indicating clearly that they will utilized all the organic solid waste generated.
33. A copy of ‘Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with coal supplier for
imported coal and brick manufactures for management of fly ash.
34. Authorization/Membership for the disposal of liquid effluent in CETP and solid/hazardous waste in TSDF, if any.
35. Risk assessment for storage for chemicals/solvents. 36. Material safety data sheet of chemicals to be submitted.
37. An action plan to develop green belt in 33% area. 38. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site should be included to
harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water.
39. Details of occupational health programme. To which chemicals, workers are exposed
directly or indirectly:
a. Whether these chemicals are within threshold Limit values (TLV)/ Permissible
Exposure Levels as per ACGIH recommendation.
b. What measures company has taken to keep these chemicals within PEL/TLV.
c. How the workers are evaluated concerning their exposure to chemicals during pre-
placement and periodical medical monitoring.
d. What are onsite and offsite emergency plan during chemical disaster.
e. Liver function tests (LFT) during preplacement and periodical examination.
f. Details of occupational health surveillance programme.
40. Socio-economic development activities should be in place.
41. Note on compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines.
42. Detailed Environment Management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to details of air pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency,
responsibility and time bound implementation plan for mitigation measures should be provided.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 34 of 62
43. EMP should include the concept of water minimization, recycle/reuse/recover
techniques, Energy conservation and natural resource conservation.
44. Corporate Environmental Responsibility
a) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board
of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.
b) Does the Environmental Policy prescribe for standard operating process/procedures to
bring into focus any infringement/ deviation/violation of the environmental or forest norms/conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.
45. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions. Details
of this system may be given. 46. Does the company have a system of reporting of noncompliance / violations of
environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or stakeholders at large? The reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA
report.
47. Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any
court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
48. Public hearing to be conducted and issues raised and commitments made by the
project proponent on the same should be included in EIA/EMP report in the form of
tabular chart with financial budget for complying with the commitments made.
16- Proposed 227.40 acre OPUS Integrated Township near Ghaziabad. Mr. A
Raghunath, General Manager, H-87, Ist Floor, Sector-63, NOIDA. File No. 1312/
DD-Y
The project proponent informed the committee that:
1. Recommendations for environmental clearance of the project were made by the
committee in its meeting dated 16/07/2014.
2. The Authority in its meeting dated 12/08/2014 made following observations:
"
The SEIAA gone through the recommendations of the SEAC regarding the matter and
examined the respective project file. The SEIAA directed the project proponent to-
1. Submit plan for LIG and EWS housing as per Local Development Authority bye-
laws.
2. As under the heading of "Environmental Sensitivity" of from-1 it is mentioned
that there is a natural lake within 15 K.M. of the proposed project boundary.
Submit exact location of the lake on the map with reference to project site with
estimated impacts with proper drainage plan mentioning its final disposal.
3. As the project proponent has submitted that revised layout plan with increased
green belt up to 21% from of 15% map/plan showing 21% green belt should be
submitted.
4. Explain whether the project is submitted for infrastructure development only or it
includes development of all facilities i.e. residential/commercial/facility areas etc.
5. Submit a copy of Land allotment letter in the name of owner of land.
"
3. The project proponent submitted their reply through his letter dated 18-09-214. The
project proponent letter dated 18-09-2014 was put up and discussed in the SEIAA meeting dated 03/12/2014. The SEIAA observed that the information submitted by
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 35 of 62
the project proponent is very short and not clear. The SEIAA also observed that there
is a natural lake (waster body) adjacent to the project as informed by project
proponent however, no specific details have been submitted by the project proponent.
Hence, the authority directed to refer the matter back to the committee to appraised
the matter in view of issues raised by the authority and to considered sensitivity
around the project.
The committee discussed the matter in light of issues raised by SEIAA and directed the proponent to make a presentation on the queries raised by the SEIAA.
The proponent requested to appear alongwith presentation in next meeting. The committee agreed to include the matter in next SEAC meeting. Copy of reply to be
submitted also to all members of the committee.
17- Mixed use IT/ITES Project “Auriel Towne” at Plot No-31, Sector-KP-V, Greater
Noida, G B Nagar, Sri Rajneesh Gupta, Director, H-38, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. File
No. 2204/ AD-Sub.
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
15/11/2014 wherein the project proponents were directed to submit information. The project
proponent submitted their information through letter dated 10/12/2014.
A presentation was made by Shri K.C. Tripathi, authorized representative of project
proponent along with their consultant M/s Ascenso Management And Consulting Services
Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,
informed the committee that:-
1- The environmental clearance is sought for Mixed use IT/ITES Project “Auriel
Towne” at Plot No-31, Sector-KP-V, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Shubh Advisors Pvt.
Ltd.
2- Detailed area statement of the project is as follows:
S. No Particulars Area (m2
) In percentage
1 Total Plot Area 40,500.00 --
2 Permissible Ground Coverage 12,150.00 30% of Plot Area
3 Proposed Ground Coverage 11,956.25 29.52 % of Plot Area
4 Permissible FAR @ 2 81,000.00 200 % of Total Plot Area
5 5% FAR for Green Building 4,050.00 5% of Permissible FAR
6 Proposed FAR Area @1.99
· Facility Area
· IT Area
· Commercial Area
· Residential Area
80,933.40
10,464.61
46,402.82
12,016.59
12,049.00
199% of Total Plot Area
12.92% of Proposed FAR
57.33 %of Proposed FAR
14.84 % of Proposed FAR
14.88% of Proposed FAR
7 Service Area
• IT/ITES Area/ Commercial Area/Facility Area
• Residential
8,150.10
6,392.77
1,757.33
10.06% of Permissible FAR
78.43% of service Area
21.56% of service Area
8 Free FAR Area 1,653.48 2% of Permissible FAR
9 Stilt Area 305.14 --
10 Basement Area
· Basement 1
· Basement 2
54367.60
34511.59
19856.01
--
11 Built-up Area (5+6+7+8+9+10) 1,49,459.74 --
12 Open area 28,543.75 70.47 % of plot area
13 Landscape Area 14,859.48 52 % of open area
14 Height of Highest Tower 99.75 m --
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 36 of 62
3- Project details are as follows:
Name and Location of the Project Mixed Use IT/ITES Project “Auriel Towne”, at Plot no. 31,
KP- V, Greater Noida, Distt- Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.
Developers of the project M/s. Shubh Advisors Pvt. Ltd.
Total Plot Area 40,500 m
2
.
Built-up Area (Proposed FAR + Basement
area + Services area) 1,49,459.749 m
2
.
Total Water Consumption 505 KLD
Total Freshwater Requirement 184 KLD
(Domestic water = 179 KLD + Swimming Pool water = 5
KLD)
Power Requirement 7.5 MVA Says 7500 KVA
Power Backup 6 DG Sets of total capacity of 8250 KVA
(2 x 1250+ 3x 1500) 1 DG Sets of 1250 KVA is on standby
Total Parking provided 1635 ECS
Solid Waste to be Generated 6089.25 kg/day
No. of RWH Pits 16
4- Population details of the project are as follows:
S. No. Types No of unit / Area in m sq Person Per Unit Population
1 Commercial Area 8,516.879 1 person/ 6 sq m 1419
2 Facility Area 10,464.614 1 person/ 6 sq m 1744
3 IT Block 46,402.82 1 person/10 sq m 4640
4 Group Housing 39 unit 4.5 175.5
5 Villas Type 1 50 unit 7 350
6 Villas Type 2 10 unit 7 70
7 Studio Apartments 96 unit 3 288
8 Visitor
(10 % of overall Project)
868
Total Population 9,555
5- Water calculation details are as follows: S. N. Description Population Unit water
consumption
(liters)
Total water
required (KLD)
Water
requirement for
Domestic Use
(KLD)
Flushing
Water
(KLD)
A Residential
Population
883 86 75.93 57.39 18.54
B Staff/Servants 7803 45 351.13 117.04 234.09
C Visitor 868 15 13.02 5.20 7.812
D Swimming Pool --- --- 5 --- ---
E Horticulture
(14859.48 m2
)
--- 1 liter 14.85 --- ---
F DG Set Cooling
(3*1250+ 3*1500)
--- 0.9 kVA/h 45 --- ---
Total 505 KLD 179 KLD 260
KLD
6- Solid waste calculation details are as follows: Category of Solid Waste Waste Generation Average Occupancy Waste
generated
Residential 0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 0.45 1751 787.95
Commercial Area 0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 1.5 1419 2128.5
Facility Area 0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 1.5 1744 2616
IT Area 0.05 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 0.12 4640 556.8
Total waste generated 6,089.25
7- The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 37 of 62
The committee discussed the replies and recommended grant of environmental
clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority
earlier and following specific conditions:
1. Adequate green cover not less than 33% of the plotted area should be provided within
the premises. 2. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more
capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for
designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization.
3. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken with regular testing and monitoring
of treated water.
4. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to
be used in-house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving it to end
users.
5. Copy of Green building Certificate to be submitted regarding extra FAR.
6. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of
Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority.
7. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as
amended). 8. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan
submitted.
9. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% Solar lighting is to be
provided in the common areas/common stairs.
10. Parking guideline as per Greater Noida Development Authority should be followed.
Parking for disabled persons should be explored.
11. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.
12. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from
the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.
13. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done
only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after
permission from CGWB.
14. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets
capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building. 15. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP
to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines. 16. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.
17. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made. 18. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of
residents. 19. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be
followed for construction work.
20. Dual plumbing should be adopted.
21. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be
restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent
authority.
22. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any
buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 38 of 62
23. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In
case of default the Environmental Clearance will deem to be cancelled.
24. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for
construction.
25. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.
26. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose.
27. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc. Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including
the proper treatment and the disposal of the wastes.
18- BEAVE HEART Raj Nagar (Housing Complex) Khasra N0- 1083, Vill-Noor Nagar,
Ghaziabad, U.P.Sri J.P. Malpani, Vice President, B-49, Sector-67, G B Nagar,
NOIDA, U.P. File No. 1667/JDCA-S
The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the
case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project
proponent.
19- Group Housing at Khasra No-239 & 250, ward Mohanlalganj, Madharmau Village,
Sultanpur Road, Lucknow. Sri Sarvesh Kumar, 8, J C Bose Marg, Hazaratganj,
Lucknow. File No. 2199/ AD-H
The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the
case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project proponent.
20- Group Housing “Speed Way Avenue” at GH-A2,Jaypee Sports City, Sector 25,SDZ,
Yamuna Expressway Greater Noida. Mr Sanjeev Sharma,A-14,Kailash Colony,
Near Metro Station, New Delhi. File No. 2251/DD-DS
The committee noted that the reply in the matter has been submitted on 18/02/2015 hence the matter should be taken on its chronology. Accordingly the matter is delisted from
the agenda of the meeting and should be taken up as per chronology.
21- Special Development Zone, Sec.125 Yamuna Exp.Way, Noida, G.B. Nagar. Mr
Sameer Gaur, M.D. & CEO,JPSK Sports Pvt. Ltd. Sector-128, Noida. File No. 1806/
DD-Y
The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the
case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project
proponent.
22- “Awadh Vihar Bhoomi Vikas Evam Grahisthan Yojna, Vill-Devamau, Sarsavan,
Barauli Khalilabae, Brauna, Ghusval Kalan, Hariharpur, Sevain, Ahmamau,
Sulatanpur Road, Lucknow. U.P. Avas Evm Vikas Parishad Office Complex, IIIrd
Floor, Sec-9A, Vrinavan Yojna, Lucknow. File No. 2278/ AD-H
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
21/10/2014 wherein the committee made following observation:
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 39 of 62
"The committee noted that the project is covered under category 8 "b" with plot area
572.961 ha. The committee after going though the document submitted by the project
proponent deliberated that the project involves a large area and may include sensitivities
which should be explained through DPR of the project. The project proponent should be
directed to submit the detailed project report of the project so that the terms of reference may
be issued in view of details of the project. "
The project proponent submitted their information through letter dated 24/12/2014. A
presentation was made by Shri A.K. Mishra, Executive Engineer along with their consultant
M/s Sawen Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. The proponent, through the documents submitted
and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-
1- The environmental clearance is sought for “Awadh Vihar Bhoomi Vikas Evam
Grahisthan Yojna, Vill-Devamau, Sarsavan, Barauli Khalilabae, Brauna, Ghusval
Kalan, Hariharpur, Sevain, Ahmamau, Sulatanpur Road, Lucknow. M/s U.P. Avas
Evm Vikas Parishad.
2- Area detail of the project is as follows:
Land Uses Pocket-1 Pocket-2 Total
Area
(Acre)
Total
%
Total
Area
(Hac)
Area
(Acre)
% Area
(Hac)
Area
(Acre)
% Area
(Hac)
Residential
Area
688.97 55.66 278.82 60.56 34.06 24.51 749.53 52.95 303.33
Commercial
Area
62.44 5.04 25.268 4.99 2.81 2.019 67.43 4.76 27.288
Institutional
Area
24.565 1.98 9.94 27.787 15.63 11.245 52.352 3.69 21.186
Green Area 229.005 18.5 92.67 40.1835 22.6
16.262
269.188 19.02
108.938
Road Area 194.20 15.69 78.59 26.26 14.77 10.626 220.46 15.57 89.217
Village Abadi
Area
38.70 3.13 15.66 18.03 10.14 7.296 56.73 4.01 22.958
Total Area 1237.88 100 500.945 177.81 100 71.958 1415.69 100 572.916
3- Proposed facilities are as follows:
S. No. Facilities Numbers
1 Nursery School 85
2 Primary School 50
3 J. High School 33
4 Inter College 24
5 Degree College 3
6 Police Station 4
7 Police Chawki 10
8 Electrical Sub Station 10
9 Telephone Exchange 2
10 N.H. Play Area 1
11 General Hospital 2
12 Health Centre 12
13 Community Centre 10
14 B.K. & P.G. 6
15 U.G.R. 9
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 40 of 62
16 Fire Station 1
17 Zonal Sport Centre 3
4- Salient features details are as follows:
• Total Expected Population of Township: 511854 Persons
• Source of Water Supply: 12 nos. of Bore wells (18”)
• Total Consumption of Water: 44.40 MLD
• Waste Water Treatment: STP of 45 MLD capacity (split in 4.5 -5.0 MLD STP s) &
ETP of 70 KLD Capacity
• Total No. of Rain Water Harvesting Pits: 102 pits
• Total Municipal Solid Waste generated: 318.885 MTD
• Total Biomedical Waste generated: 112 kg/ day
• The water shall be withdrawn from 12 nos. of bore wells 18”
• The one time water requirement for firefighting : 2.49 MLD
5- Population details are as follows:
S.
No.
Land Use Pocket 1 Pocket 2 Total Area
(Acre)
Total
Area
(Hec.)
Population
Density
assumed
(Persons/
hac)
Total
Population
1 Residential 688.97 60.56 749.53 303.33 1625 492912
2 Institutional 24.565 27.787 52.352 21.186 250 5297
3 Commercial 62.44 4.99 67.43 27.29 500 13645
Total 511854
6- Water requirement details are as follows:
S.
No.
Location Per Capita
Water Demand
(LPCD)
Population/
Area (Sq. m.)
Total Water
Requirement
(KLD)
Waste Discharge
(KLD)
1 Residential 86 492912 42390.43 33912.35
2 Commercial 45 13645 614.025 491.22
3 Institutional 45 5297 238.365 190.69
Total Domestic Water Requirement 43242.82 34594.26
4 General Hospital 340 200 68.00 54.4
7 Horticulture &
Landscaping 1 l/ m
2
1089378.94 1089.379 NIL
Total Water Requirement & Discharge 44400.199 34648.66
7- Municipal soild waste generation details are as follows:
Type of Waste Colour of Bins Category Disposal Total Waste (Kg/day)
Organics
(vegetable leaves
& grass)
Green Bio Degradable Municipal Solid
Waste Site
175386.77
Paper/ Plastic/
Glass /ceramics/
Metal/
Blue Recyclable Approved Recycler 41455.056
Stones, Ashes &
Miscellaneous
Grey Non-Bio degradable Municipal Solid waste
Site
102043.21
Therefore, total expected MSW waste = 318.885 MTPD.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 41 of 62
8- The project proposals are covered under category 8"b" of EIA Notification, 2006.
The committee discussed the replies submitted by project proponent and
recommended following TORs and general guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding
the proposals:
Additional TORs
1. No. of trees to be felled, if any. Status of permission of Forest Department in this
regard.
2. Land use approved by the competent authority.
3. Complete Details of facilities to be developed by the project proponent i.e. for which
environment clearance is sought.
4. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and
topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with
photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background
information.
5. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.
6. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard
electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.
7. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.
8. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting
landscape plan is to be submitted.
9. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure
covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal
of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.
10. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for
discharge.
11. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central
Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.
12. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,
should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated
water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.
13. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment
facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.
14. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between
habitation and proposed project.
15. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.
16. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.
17. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and
other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.
18. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.
19. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may
be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.
20. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their
disposal.
21. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 42 of 62
22. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.
23. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the
common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all
effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.
Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.
24. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be
described.
25. Disaster management plan should be prepared.
26. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be
described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.
27. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-
laws or construction manual of the MoEF
28. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be
clearly mentioned
29. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.
30. Use of local building materials should be described.
31. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack
details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.
32. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.
33. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources
of energy in the light of ECBC code.
34. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project
affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should
be prepared.
35. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for
Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.
36. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of
minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need
base assessment study in the study area.
37. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.
38. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of
generated waste water.
39. Project falling with in 05 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance
from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not
earmarked.
40. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management
services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water
Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.
41. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to
the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District
Magistrate of related District.
General Guidelines
a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly
attested by Public Notary, stating that:
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 43 of 62
I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is
proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for
any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project
proponent.”
II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil
construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from
getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing
has not been done, then the same may be deleted).
III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,
enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and
I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to
be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,
if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”
IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified
under any law.
b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been
complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented
are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted
along with EIA.
c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions
indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,
and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,
so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.
d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA
notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):
Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental
attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.
e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically
mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which
this EIA is prepared.
f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm
along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.
g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated
with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through
which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly
be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th
August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.
h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.
The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be
submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the
information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 44 of 62
23- es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23es0 bf.M;u vkW;y dkiksZjs'ku ds i= fnukad 23----01010101----2222015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus 015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus 015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus 015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus gsrqAgsrqAgsrqAgsrqA
The committee was informed that M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Lucknow has submitted a letter dated 23/01/2015 through which they have informed that:
1. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, is proposing to set up a new Lube Blending
cum filling plant at Plot no.: 491, 492 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500,
501,502,503,504,505Kha, 506,507,508 & 510 Village: Amousi Distt:
Lucknow. In this plant they will prepare different grades of Lubricants by
mixing of base oil with additives.
2. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd want to inform SEIAA that all the products
i.e. Base oil, Additives and Lubricants are non- Hazardous in nature. They
have attached project report with detailed products specifications & operation
design basis and communication from our Quality Control Department
regarding nature of the products proposed to be handled at Lube plant. They
have also received NOC for the project from State Pollution Control Board
(UPPCB) copy of the same.
3. As per point 6(b) of schedule attached notification issued by Ministry of Environment & Forests dated 14.09.2006, hazardous petroleum products fall
under Category B . Since the product which M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd are proposing to handle is non-hazardous in nature so they need SEIAA
guidance whether Environmental Clearance for the project is applicable for their project.
4. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd has attached the details of the project with process flow diagram Environment management plan for your kind reference.
The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that project proponent
should go through the provisions of EIA Notification, 2006 and should decide whether they require a clearance this activity. It is necessary to submit a project in
prescribed form-1 and other documents to SEIAA for making any decision in this regards which has not been submitted by the project proponent. However, the
committee directed that Secretariat examine the matter on the basis of provisions of
EIA Notification and put up a note for Authority.
24- es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20es0 ,l0ds0oh0 bUQksVsd izk0 fy0] ds i= fnukad 20----01010101----2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s 2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s 2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s 2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus gsrqAtkus gsrqAtkus gsrqAtkus gsrqA
The committee noted that M/s SKV Infotech through their letter dated 20/01/2014 has submitted that they have applied for environmental clearance of Institutional Complex
"Wisten Park" at plot no. 17, knowledge park-V, Greater Noida on 13/10/2014 and has
not been appraised till date. They have also submitted that the project has also been
submitted for green building certification of IGBC hence, they should be given priority in
appraisal as per MoEF OM dated 10/05/2011.
The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that matters at SEAC are being
considered in chronological order and the said matter shall also be taken up
chronologically. However, the committee is trying its level best to increase the frequency
of meetings so that the pendency can be disposed at the earliest. The committee also
deliberated that priority shall be given to only those project which have applied alongwith
precertification of Green Building. In present matter no precertification has been
submitted hence, the project proponent can not claim for priority on the basis of mere
submission of application to IGBC.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 45 of 62
25- Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29Jh lat; JhokLro] ,MoksdsssV ds i= fnukad 29----01010101----2015 ij lfef2015 ij lfef2015 ij lfef2015 ij lfefr }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus r }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus r }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus r }kjk fopkj&foe'kZ fd;s tkus gsrqAgsrqAgsrqAgsrqA
The committee was informed that Shri Sanjay Srivastava, Advocate, High Court
through his letter dated 29/01/2015 has legally advised that project proposal "Arsha
Sumangalam", 14/GH-13-C, Sector-14, Vrindavan Yojna, Lucknow is pending at SEIAA
since 17/07/2014 for environmental clearance and has not cleared it in statutory period.
they has requested to kindly take up the project in the said matter at the earliest in the next
meeting, failure to which will lead appropriate actions against SEAC.
The committee discussed the matter and deliberated that the matters at SEAC are
being considered in chronological order and the said matter shall also be taken up
chronologically. However, the committee is trying its level best to increase the frequency
of meetings so that the pendency can be disposed at the earliest.
26- Expansion & Modification of Township “Gaur City” at Plot no. GH-01, Sector-4,
Noida. M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. 305, Arunachal, 19
Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. File No. 2327/ AD-H
The committee noted that M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. submitted an
application dated 10/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance for Expansion &
Modification of Township “Gaur City” at Plot no. GH-01, Sector-4, Noida.
A presentation was made by Shri Devendra Bhandari, representative of project
proponent. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,
informed the committee that:-
1. Environmental clearance for Tonwhsip "Gaur City" at plot no. GH-01, Sector-4,
Greater Noida was issued through SEIAA letter no. 470/SEAC/531/2010/AAS dated
11/01/2011. Now modification and expansion of the proposed integrated township is
submitted for environmental clearance.
2. The environmental clearance is sought for Expansion & Modification of Township
“Gaur City” at Plot no. GH-01, Sector-4, Noida. M/s Gaursons Hi-tech Infrastructure
Pvt. Ltd.
3. Area details of the project is as follows:
DESCRIPTION OF AREA AREA (Sqm) % OF AREA FOR
DEVELOPMENT
Total Area of Scheme 5,03,216 100.00
Sold Land 60947.08 12.10
Balance Area 4,42,268.92 87.90
DESCRIPTION OF AREA AREA (Hectare) % OF AREA FOR
DEVELOPMENT
Residential Land Use, including Facilities
i.e. Schools, Health and Community
Centers, etc.
19.07 43.17
Institutional Area 2.52 5.70
Commercial Land Use 5.03 11.32
Parks, Open Spaces and Roads 17.61 39.81
Total 44.23 100.00
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 46 of 62
4. Comparative Statement of the project is as follows:
S No. Details Previous EC Proposed
Modifications
Remarks
1 Plot Area (sqmt) 5,03,216.00 4,42,268.92 Part Residential Plot Sold
2 FAR (sqmt) 2.750 3.675 [Purchasable
(0.75 & IGBC
0.175)]
Bye-Laws Revised
3 Built up Area (sqmt) 12,63,072. 13,66,268 FAR Increased
(Built-up area increased due to
increase in FAR: from 2.75 to
3.675)
4 Population Density
(PPH)
1650 2100 Bye-Laws Revised
5 Population 41515 40039 Part Residential Plot Sold
6 Category 8 (b) 8 (b) Un-changed
7 No. of dwelling units (DUs)
8303 8898 -
8 Maximum Height of the
building (in mtrs.)
150 150 Airport NOC obtained
9 Area for the Green 45% 45% Un-changed
10 Recycled waste water
requirement for
horticulture
1.4 lt./m2 1 lt./m2 By – Laws Revised
5. Comparative salient features details are as follows:
Details Previous EC Proposed Modifications
Parking 10644 ECS 8758 ECS as per GNIDA
Power
requirement
38.40 MVA from Grid Power 43.30 MVA from Grid Power
Power requirement has increased due to increase in FAR.
Power back-up Provide Backup DG Sets as per
requirement
Provide Backup DG Sets as per requirement
Water
requirement,
source &
Sewage
Disposal
Fresh water : 6950 KLD, Greater Noida
Water Supply (@ 135 lpcd)
Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 KLD
(From Greater Noida CSTP)
Total water requirement : 8450 KLD
Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to
Greater Noida CSTP
Sewage Flow: 5560 KLD
Fresh water : 2987 KLD, Greater Noida
Water Supply (@ 86 lpcd)
Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 + 960 KLD
(From Greater Noida CSTP)
Total water requirement : 5447 KLD
Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to Greater
Noida CSTP
Sewage Flow: 3158 KLD
Power requirement
OLD REQUIREMENT : 38,450 KVA REVISED REQUIREMENT : 43,295 KVA
Source of power State Grid Power
Power Backup (16x600 KVA, 4x500 KVA, 4x750 KVA)
DG Sets are provided as per requirement for backup in Commercial, Institutional &
Residential Areas and common facilities only.
No of RWH Pits 42 Pits
6. Area details of the project is as follows:
Total Builtup Area Detail
S.No Description Plot Area FAR FAR
Area
*Basement
Area
15%
prescribed
FAR
Total
Built up
Area
Sqmt Sqmt
1 GC-1 47370.00 3.675 174085 37896 17408 229389
a) Milk Booth 200.00 1.000 200 20 220
b) Nursery School 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 47 of 62
c) Convenient shops 2000.00 2.000 4000 1600 400 6000
2 GC-4 26600.00 3.675 97755 21280 9776 128811
a) Community center 2300.00 1.500 3450 1840 345 5635
b) Nursing home 3000.00 2.750 8250 2400 825 11475
c) Nursery School 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450
d) Milk Booth 200.00 1.000 200 20 220
e) Dispensary 500.00 1.500 750 75 825
3 GC-5 35058.45 3.675 128840 28046.76 12884 169771
a) Nursing home 2000.00 2.750 5500 1600 550 7650
b) Milk Booth 200.00 1.000 200 20 220
c) Nursery school / Cretch 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450
4 GC-6/ I 27752.92 3.675 101992 22202.336 10199 134394
b) Nursery School 1000.00 1.500 1500 800 150 2450
5 GC-7 53879.55 3.675 198007 43103.64 19801 260912
a) Sen Sec School 10000.00 8000 0 8000
b) Nursery School 2000.00 1.500 3000 1600 300 4900
c) Milk Booth 400.00 1.000 400 40 440
d) Community center 5700.00 1.500 8550 4560 855 13965
e) Convenient shops 6000.00 2.000 12000 4800 1200 18000
6 C-1 - A
a) Commercial 23323.60 4.200 97959 18658.88 9796 126414
7 C-1 - B
a) Commercial 23000.00 4.200 96600 18400 9660 124660
8 C-2
a) Commercial 3998.00 4.200 16792 3198.4 1679 21669
9 IST-1
a) Institutional 15660.00 2.750 43065 12528 4307 59900
10 IST-2
a) Institutional 500.00 1.000 500 400 50 950
11 IST-3
a) Institutional 9000.00 1.500 13500 7200 1350 22050
Total 304643 1021595 242514 102159 1366268
Note : *Approx. basement area considered as 80% of plot area
*Approx prescribed FAR area considered as 10% of FAR area
7. Water requirement details are as follows:
Total Water Demand Old Requirement Revised Requirement
8450 KLD 5447 KLD
Source of water Greater Noida Water Supply
(Treated effluent will meet around 18% of water demand of the project)
Requirement Quantity
(kld)
Domestic 3443
Institutional 113
Community Center 37
Commercial 233
Schools 115
Nursing Home 6
Total 3947
Including Horticulture, Cooling etc. 1500 (Kld)
5447
Source Quantity (kld)
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 48 of 62
Fresh Water (Water
Supply)
3947
Reuse of treated sewage
effluent from Greater
Noida CSTP
1500 KLD
(Horticulture) + 960 KLD (Flushing)
(As per availability)
Total 5447
8. Solid waste generation details are as follows:
Old Solid Waste Generation - 22567 Kg/ day
Revised Solid Waste generation - 21829 Kg/ day
Quantity of solid waste generated has reduced due to decrease in population
MSW Generated Rate Unit Population Waste Generation
(Kg/Day)
Residential Area 0.5 Kg/day 40039 20020
Dispensary 1.125 Kg/day 50 56
Commercial Area 0.2 Kg/day 5033 1006
Schools / Institutions 0.1 Kg/day 4966 497
Community Center 0.1 Kg/day 2500 250
Total MSW Generated 21829
Total Population 52588
Biomedical Waste from Dispensary 0.375 Kg/day 50 18.75
9. The project is covered under category 8"b" of EIA notification, 2006.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been
permitted.
2. All approved maps/services plan.
3. Give no construction certificate with respect to proposed
increase/modification.
4. Parking plan.
5. Area details as per proposed land use is to be submitted.
6. Various land uses with area analysis.
7. Affidavit regarding installation of organic waste convertor.
8. Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental
management facilitates.
9. Proposal for water body for rain waer harvesting as per norms.
10. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its
percentage of total area.
11. Tower/block wise area details.
12. 2% Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary
provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted.
13. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan
for the same should be submitted.
14. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding
ownership.
15. Permission of municipal authority for water supply and discharge of waste
water into municipal sewer/drain.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 49 of 62
16. Width of internal roads should be according to length of junction to junction.
It should be corrected accordingly.
17. Land use of the proposed site should be as per proposed activity. Submit the
related papers.
18. Copy of letter from Noida Development. AUTH. regarding providing water supply.
19. A definite proposal the treatment and recycling of a portion of the domestic effluents
in order to reduce the fresh water load should be incorporated and detailed submitted.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
27- Modification and Expansion of Group Housing Project of “Gaur City-2” at GH-03,
Sector-16C, Greater Noida. M/s Gaursons Promoters Pvt. Ltd. 305, Arunachal, 19
Barakhamba Road, New Delhi File No. 2328/ DD-DS
The committee noted that M/s Gaursons Promoters Pvt. Ltd. submitted an application
dated 10/05/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance for Modification and
Expansion of Group Housing Project of “Gaur City-2” at GH-03, Sector-16C, Greater Noida.
A presentation was made by Shri Devendra Bhandari, representative of project
proponent. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made,
informed the committee that:-
1. Environmental clearance for Township "Gaur City-2" at plot no. GH-03, Sector-16C,
Greater Noida was issued through SEIAA letter no. 1077/SEAC/607/20101/DDS
dated 04/05/2011. Now modification and expansion of the proposed township is
submitted for environmental clearance.
2. The environmental clearance is sought for Modification and Expansion of Group
Housing Project of “Gaur City-2” at GH-03, Sector-16C, Greater Noida. M/s
Gaursons Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
3. Comparative area details of the project is as follows:
S. NO. DETAILS PREVIOUS EC PROPOSED
EXPANSION &
MODIFICATION
REMARKS
1 Plot Area (Sqm) 413261.11 272968.60 Part Residential Plot Sold
2 FAR (Sqm) 1111078.650(2.750) 1003160.90 (3.675) By – Laws Revised
[3.675 (Purchasable (0.75
& IGBC 0.175)]
3 Built up Area (Sqm) 11,36,468 13,63,695 FAR Increased
(Built-up area increased
due to increase in FAR:
from 2.75 to 3.675)
4 Population Density
(PPH)
1650 2100 By – Laws Revised
5 Residential
Population
68190 57326 Part Residential Plot Sold
6 Maximum Height of
the building (in
mtrs.)
150 150 Airport NOC obtained
7 Area for the green
belt development
45% 45% Un-changed
8 Recycled waste 1.4 lt./m2 1 lt./m2 By – Laws Revised
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 50 of 62
water requirement
for horticulture
9 Category 8’b’ 8’b’ Un-Changed
4. Comparative salient features details of the project is as follows:
Previous EC REVISED DATA
Parking 17484 ECS 12540 ECS
Power
requirement
26.14 MVA from Grid Power and DG
Sets
24.17 MVA from Grid Power and DG Sets
Power Requirement has decreased due to decrease in dwelling units with respect to reduction
in plot area.
Power back-up Backup DG Sets as per requirement Backup DG Sets as per requirement
No of
Dwelling Unit
13638 DUs 12739 DUs
Water
requirement,
source &
Sewage
Disposal
Fresh water : 6065 KLD, Greater Noida
Water Supply
Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 KLD
(From Greater Noida CSTP)
Total water requirement : 6201 KLD
Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to
Greater Noida CSTP
Sewage Flow: 5458 KLD
Fresh water : 5438 KLD, Greater Noida Water
Supply
Reuse of treated sewage : 1500 + 1317 KLD
(From Greater Noida CSTP)
Total water requirement : 6938 KLD
Sewage Disposal Facility: Linked to Greater
Noida CSTP
Sewage Flow: 4351 KLD
Water requirement is reduce in revised data due to reduce in population as per decrease in plot
area.
No of RWH
pits 37 Pits
5. Area details of the project is as follows:
Group Housing BUILT-UP AREA DETAIL
S.No Description Plot Area FAR FAR
Area
*Basement
Area
15%
prescribed
FAR
Total
Built up
Area
Sqmt Sqmt
1 Residential (GC-10,11,12,14,16) 245317.6 3.675 939735 244800 93973 1278508
a) School - 1 Sen Sec School with
three Nursery School
10000.00 13500 4986 1350 19836
b) School - 2 Sen Sec School with
three Nursery School
10000.00 12500 4312 1250 18062
c) Nursery School/Crech 1500 0 150 1650
d) Nursing home 3000.00 2.750 8250 2400 825 11475
e) Religious building 1101.00 2521 881 252 3654
f) Police Chownki & Auto cum Taxi Stand
1050.00 1550 840 155 2545
g) Petrol Pump/Gas Station 2500.00 1250 2000 125 3375
h) Convenient Shops 9554 0 955 10509
i) Milk Booth 800 0 80 880
j) Community Hall 12000 0 1200 13200
Total FAR 272968.60 1003160 260219 100315 1363695
Note
:
*Approx. basement area considered as 80% of plot area
*Approx prescribed FAR area considered as 10% of FAR area
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 51 of 62
6. Water requirement details are as follows:
Total Water Demand Old Requirement Revised Requirement
6201 KLD 5438 KLD
Source of water Greater Noida Water Supply
Requirement Qty (kld)
Domestic 4929
Services and Facilities 509
Total 5438
Including Horticulture, Cooling
1500 KLD, Road Washing
6938
Source Qty (kld)
Greater Noida Water Supply 5438
Reuse of treated sewage effluent
from Greater Noida CSTP
1500 + 1317
(As per availability)
Total 6938
7. Solid waste generation details are as follows:
Old Waste Generation: 27275 Kg/day
Revised Waste generation: 24960 Kg/day
Quantity of Solid waste generated has reduced due to decrease in total population
MSW Generated From @ Unit Population Waste
Generation
Unit
Residential Area 0.4 Kg/day 57326 22930 Kg/day
Dispensary 1 Kg/day 50 50 Kg/day
Commercial Area 1 Kg/day 960 960 Kg/day
Schools / Institutions 0.1 Kg/day 7500 750 Kg/day
Religious Building 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day
Police Station 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day
Petrol Pump 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day
Community Hall 0.1 Kg/day 2500 250 Kg/day
Milk Booth 0.1 Kg/day 50 5 Kg/day
Total MSW Generated 24960 Kg/day
Total Poplulation 68536
Biomedical Waste from Dispensary 0.375 Kg/day 18.75 Kg/day
(approx.)
8. The project is covered under category 8"b" of EIA notification, 2006.
The committee discussed the matter and directed the project proponent to submit
following information:
1. Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been
permitted.
2. All approved maps/services plan.
3. Give no construction certificate with respect to proposed
increase/modification.
4. Parking plan.
5. Various land uses with area analysis.
6. Affidavit regarding installation of organic waste convertor.
7. Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental
management facilitates.
8. Proposal for water body for rain waer harvesting as per norms.
9. Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its
percentage of total area.
10. Tower/block wise area details.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 52 of 62
11. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with Rs. 16.0 crore along
with budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and
submitted.
12. 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case. Plan
for the same should be submitted.
13. Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding
ownership.
14. Permission of municipal authority for water supply and discharge of waste
water into municipal sewer/drain.
15. Width of internal roads should be according to length of junction to junction.
It should be corrected accordingly.
16. Land use of the proposed site should be as per proposed activity. Submit the
related papers.
17. A definite proposal the treatment and recycling of a portion of the domestic
effluents in order to reduce the fresh water load should be incorporated and
detailed submitted.
The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.
28- Cement Grinding Unit at Plot no. D-22 Industrial Area and khasra No130C & 130P,
Sikanderabad, Bulandsahar, Uttar Pradesh, M/s Durgashree Bricks Pvt. Ltd., File
No. 2336/ AD(VB)
The committee noted that the matter earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
14/09/2014 wherein the committee directed the proponent to submit the application under
their signature. The matter was again scheduled in SEAC meeting dated 21/10/2014 wherein
the project proponent did not appear. The matter was again scheduled in SEAC meeting dated
12/10/204.
A presentation was made by Shri Rahul Mittal along with their consultant M/s Prakriti
Consultant Services. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation
made, informed the committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Cement Grinding Unit at Plot no. D-22
Industrial Area and khasra No130C & 130P, Sikanderabad, Bulandsahar, U.P. M/s
Durgashree Bricks Pvt. Ltd.
2. Salient features of the project is as follows:
Total Plot Area 8120 sqm (D22:1800+130C:3790+130P:2530)
Type of Unit Cement Grinding Unit
Capacity 1200 TPD ( 360000 T.P.A. on 300 working days)
Latitude & Longitude 25°27'9 "N 82°34'38."E
Elevation above Mean Sea Level 674 ft
Green Belt Area 2,680 sqm
Raw Material Clinker & Gypsum : Rajasthan,Fly Ash: from NTPC
Variety of Cement OPC (Ordinary Portland Cement),
PPC (Portland Pozolona Cement)
Water requirement 2 KLD only for domestic use
Solid Waste Only Domestic solid waste generated
Source of water Bore Well (Ground Water)
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 53 of 62
Electric requirement 2000 KVA for 1200 TPD Cement Plant (UP Power Corporation)
Worker & Staff 53 nos.
Total Area 8,120SQM(D22:11880000+130C:3790+130P:2530)
Total Constructed Area 4000 SQM
Internal Road 1000 SQM
Total Green Area 2680 SQM
Parking 440 SQM
3. The project is covered under category 3"b" of EIA notification, 2006.
The committee discussed the matter and recommended following TORs and general
guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding the proposals:
Additional TORs:
1. Approved plan/layout plan from Bulandshahar Industrial Development Authority. 2. Details of total area, covered area, open area, factory area, lab area, raw material store
yard.
3. Environment Impact study must be done (by a consultant registered/certified as per QCI
notification/MoEF directives) in an area of 15 km radius with inclusion of following
aspects:
4. Present land use based on satellite imagery should be included. Study area should be 10
Km radius. 5. Details of location of wildlife sanctuary and national parks within 10 km radius of the
plant and plan for conservation and protection of the same should be included. 6. Manufacturing process details for the cement plant should be included.
7. Mass balance for the raw material and products should be included. 8. Energy balance data for all the components should be incorporated.
9. Site-specific micro-meteorological data for temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall including inversion height and mixing height should be
included. 10. Collection of baseline data on air, water (surface and ground water), soil, noise,
demography etc. for one season other than monsoon should be included and the Methods
of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV): Guidance for assessment of
representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental attributes detailed under EIA
manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.
11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from
project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for the
presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Ambient air quality modeling for cement plant should be included. Air quality modeling
for all the plants proposed for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be included.
14. Ambient air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following:
i. Emissions (g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures. ii. Meteorological inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind direction, ambient air temperature,
cloud cover, relative humidity & mixing height) on hourly basis. iii. Model input options for terrain, plume rise, deposition etc.
iv. Print-out of model input and output on hourly and daily average basis. v. A graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance
at every 500 m interval covering the exact location of GLC.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 54 of 62
vi. Details of air pollution control methods used with percentage efficiency that are
used for emission rate estimation with respect to each pollutant.
vii. Applicable air quality standards as per LULC covered in the study area and %
contribution of the proposed plant to the applicable Air quality standard. In case of
expansion project, the contribution should be inclusive of both existing and
expanded capacity.
viii. No. I-VII is to be repeated for fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant and used for industry.
ix. Graphs of monthly average daily concentration with down-wind distance. x. Specify when and where the ambient air quality standards are exceeded either due to
the proposed plant alone or when the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.
xi. Fugitive dust protection or dust reduction technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.
15. Sources of secondary emissions, its control and monitoring as per the CPCB guidelines
should be included.
16. Details of fugitive emissions and control technologies should be provided.
17. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from any sources.
18. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporation of RSPM data should be
included. Location of one AAQM station should be in downwind direction.
19. Presence of an aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for
recharging the aquifer should be included.
20. Source of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If surface water is
used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage and distance from project site
should also be included. 21. Ground water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management. 22. Ground water modeling showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included.
23. Column leachate study for all types of stockpiles or waste disposal sites, at 20oC-50
oC
should be conducted and included.
24. Permission for the drawl of water 94 KLD water from the concerned authority and water balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and
discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation
should be included.
25. Efforts made to minimize use of ground water along with an action plan should be
provided.
26. A chapter on hydrology study by the State Govt. may be included.
27. Action plan for surface as well as roof top rainwater harvesting and ground water
recharge should be included.
28. Scheme of proper storage of fly ash, gypsum, clinker should be included.
29. Action plan for 100% fly ash utilization should be included.
30. Impact of transportation of raw materials and the details of mitigation measures should be
included.
31. Ambient air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be
included for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with emissions (g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures and A graph of daily averaged
concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval covering the exact location of GLC.
32. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 55 of 62
as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated 30th
May, 2008.
33. Detailed description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given with
special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
34. Risk assessment and damage control should be included.
35. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, A note on the impact of drawl of
ground water on recharge potential. 36. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Surface water quality of nearby River
(60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at eight locations must be ascertained.
37. If the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zone Mapping is required at 1:5000 to 1:10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean river discharge as well
as flood occurrence frequency. 38. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for different
purposes should be included.
39. Provision of traps and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil,
grease and cleaning agents.
40. If the water is mixed with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further
transport should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the
transport capacity.
41. The pathways for pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied
for surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water with a
monitoring and management plans.
42. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also
Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
43. Geo-technical data by a bore hole of up to 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground water level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for
liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk Management in the area.
44. End use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. 45. All stock piles will have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of materials to
ground water. 46. Studies on amount of CO2 emission (daily monitoring), Hydrocarbons, other
contamination, if any, and their management.
47. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration including evaluation of noise, heat,
illumination, dust, any other chemicals, metals being suspected in environment and
going into body of workers either through inhalation, ingestion or through skin
absorption and steps taken to avoid Musculo-Skeletal Disorders (MSD), backache, pain in
minor and major joints, fatigue etc. Occupational hazards specific pre-placement and
periodical monitoring and periodical monitoring should be carried out. The detailed plan
to carry out above mentioned activity should be mentioned.
48. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33% area should be included. The
green belt should be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the
traveling roads should also be incorporated. All rooftops/terraces should have some green
cover.
49. Demography of the area and socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
50. Scheme for compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines for cement plants should be included.
51. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit project should be
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 56 of 62
included.
52. Detailed Environment management Plan (EMP) with specific reference to details of air
pollution control system, water & wastewater management, monitoring frequency and
implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.
53. EMP should include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques,
energy conservation and natural resource conservation.
54. Total capital cost & recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures. 55. Any litigation/court case pending against the proposal or land should also be included.
56. A tabular chart of the TORs and compliance index should be incorporated in EIA/EMP. 57. Project falling with in 10 km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance from
National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco-sensitive zone is not earmarked. 58. The proposal is exempted form public hearing by categorizing in B-2 category due to use
of energy efficient technology, on clinker manufacturing at the proposed site, no sensitive area within 10 km. radius, "zero" effluent discharge, utilization of all the solid waste in
the process itself including utilization of fly ash etc.
59. Besides the above, the general points mentioned below should also to be followed during
preparation of EIA/EMP:
• All documents to be properly referenced with index, page numbers and continuous
page numbering.
• Where data are presented in the report especially in tables, the period in which the
data were collected and the sources should be indicated.
As decided by the State Expert Appraisal Committee the above TORs should be
considered for preparation of EIA/EMP report for the Cement Plant; in addition to all
the relevant information as per the Generic Structure of EIA given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006.
The committee directed the proponent to take further necessary action with regards to
public hearing and the preparation of final EIA. The matter shall be discussed after
submission of final EIA.
29- Mega Leather Cluster located at Vill-Kuraina Bahadurnagar & Senpuirabpara
Near Ramaipur, Distt-Kanpur, U.P. Sri Ashraf Rizwan, Director, C/o Sultan
Tanners, Jajmau, Kanpur, U.P. File No. 2070/ OSD-T
The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEIAA meeting dated
30/10/2014 wherein the Authority taken a decision as follows:
"The SEIAA agreed with the recommendations of the SEAC that the Gram Samaj land is
being proposed for the development of Mega Leather Cluster. Therefore, as per the EIA
notification 14 Sep 2006 the matter falls under category-A i.e. the procedure of
Environmental Clearance to the project proposal does not come under the ambit of SEIAA,
U.P. The project proponent is directed to proceed to the MoEF for the Environmental
Clearance of the proposed proposal and the Proposal is therefore, Closed."
A letter dated 20/11/2014 was communicated to project proponent regarding decision
of SEIAA. The project proponent submitted a representation dated 29/01/2015 regarding the
project proposal. The matter was put up to committee in its meeting dated 21/02/2015. The
committee noted the decision of SEIAA meeting dated 30/10/2014 and deliberated that any
representation with reference to decision taken by SEIAA should be put up to SEIAA itself.
Accordingly, the committee directed to put up the representation of project proponent to the
Authority.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 57 of 62
30- Group Housing Project “Shushant Aquapolis Doondaherra, Ghaziabad- Sri Vinod
Tiku, Ex. Director (Project), 306, Ansal Naurang House, 21, KG Marg, New Delhi.
File No. 2580/ AD-H
1. The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated
15/11/2014 wherein the following request from the project proponent were discussed
in compliance to Hon'ble NGT order dated 05/09/2014 in the application M.A. no.
455/2013.
1. To reinstate the Environmental Clearance granted vide letter no. 692/ SEAC/
148/2011/TA(J) dated 30.03.2012 in light of NGT order M.A. No.455 of 2013
vide dated 05.09.2014
2. Since the controversial solid waste dumping yard area can now become
available to the developer hence, TOR for additional 14 acres land may be
issued.
2. In meeting dated 15/11/2014 , the SEAC directed as follows:
" committee discussed and deliberated that request regarding reinstating of environmental clearance dated 30/03/2012 can be decided only after the reasons for
cancelation of the E.C. letter dated 30/03/2012 be complied/fulfilled.
Also, the status/land use of the site of proposed project “Sushant Aquapolis Doondaherra, Ghaziabad" may be conformed from Ghaziabad Development
Authority. Further, the status of solid waste dumping yard as submitted by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. through their letter dated 30/09/2014 and
15/11/2014 should be conformed from Ghaziabad Development Authority, Nagar
Nigam, Ghaziabad and UP Jal Nigam as on date.
A copy of above communications should also be made to M/s Ansal Properties
and Infrastructure Ltd.
The committee also directed the project proponent to submit copy of writ
petitions and related orders/judgments made by Hon'ble Courts in the related matter,
in any. "
The SEIAA in its meeting dated 21/11/2014 agreed with the decision of
SEAC.
3. A communication was made by Member Secretary, SEIAA to Ghaziabad
Development Authority, Ghaziabad, Municipal Corporation Ghaziabad, Construction
and Design Services and Member Secretary, UPPCB for providing their comments
with respect to directions of SEAC made in meeting dated 15/11/2014.
4. Secretary, Ghaziabad Development Authority, Ghaziabad (through his letter dated
16/12/2014), project manager C&DS, UP Jal Nigam (through his letter dated
06/12/2014) and Municipal Commissioner, Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam (through his
letter dated 21/01/2015) communicated their replies to SEIAA. In all these
communications, these agencies have denied the following claim /version of M/s
Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. regarding 14 acres land in Village-
Doondahera, Ghaziabad that:
"…….The Ghaziabad Development Authority has allocated alternate plot for the
Solid Waste Scheme in Galland and Pipalhera Villages."
5. The SEAC noted that land use of the said 14 acre land is "Dumping Yard" as notified
by Housing and Urban Planning Department, Govt. of U.P. order no. 4582/8-3-2009-
502 writ/2006 dated 21/10/2009. The additional land for Dumping Yard in Village-
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 58 of 62
Galland and Pipalhera which has been made available by GDA to Nagar Nigam
Ghaziabad is not an alternate for 14 acres Dumping Yard land at Village-Doondahera.
The committee directed the project proponent that correctness of statements should be
duly verified by the project proponent before making any submissions/claims at
SEIAA.
6. The committee also noted that UP Pollution Control Board has not yet submitted their
replies in the matter.
7. The committee deliberated that in view of information received from Ghaziabad
Development Authority, Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad and C&DS, UP Jal Nigam,
Ghaziabad the request made by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. can not
be entertained by the committee as land use of said 14 acre land in Village-
Doondahera is "Dumping Yard" and Ghaziabad Development Authority has not
allocated any alternate land which would make this 14 acre land in Village-
Doondahera available to M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. Hence, the
submissions/claim made by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd. in their
petition to SEIAA are not correct and here by rejected.
8. The committee also noted that there is a Court Case pending at Hon'ble Supreme
Court related to said 14 acre land at Village-Doondahera Ghaziabad as also informed
by project proponent. Hence, no decision can be taken by SEAC in a subjudice matter
at Hon'ble Supreme Court.
9. Further, the committee also observed that the project details as submitted in form-1
alongwith the letter dated 30/09/2014 of M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructures Ltd.
are not same as proposals on which environmental clearance dated 30/03/2012 was
earlier granted by SEIAA, which was later cancelled by SEIAA on dated 01/04/2013.
A comparative statement may be seen as follows:
Issues As per E.C letter dated
30/03/2012
As per for-1 submitted
alonwith letter dated
30/09/2014
Plot Area 5,60,744.5 sqm 5,60,738.46 sqm
Built-up Area 12,66,653.14 sqm 10,13,351.57 sqm
Water Requirement 4299 KLD 3.26 MLD
Power Requirement 10.32 MW 16 MVA
MSW Generation 19.86 MT/day 15.8 TPD
Stand by DG Sets 4x6.5 MVA 7 MVA (3x1 MVA+4x0.75
MVA+2x0.5 MVA)
Sewage Generation 2826.74 KLD 3.02 MLD
Hence, the request of project proponent to reinstate the environmental
clearance dated 30/03/2012 can not be accepted prima-facie as consideration of
reinstatement request can not be made on a proposal which is different from the one,
which was cancelled by the SEIAA through letter dated 01/04/2013.
10. The committee also noted that the E.C. dated 30/03/2012 was cancelled by SEIAA
hence, the above observations/situation may be forwarded to SEIAA for taking
decision. The SEIAA may also ask Members Secretary, UPPCB to submit their reply
with reference to letter dated 1974/parya/SEAC/2582/2014 dated 26/11/2014 in the
matter.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 59 of 62
31- Group Housing at Khasra No-2243, 2244, Vill-Bambhta, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s
Utility Estates (P) Ltd., & Others. Etc. Sri Beer Singh, Director, C-79, Preet Vihar,
Delhi. File No. 2120/ AD-Sub.
The committee noted that the terms of reference in the matter were issued through
letter dated 17/10/2014. The final EIA submitted by the project proponent through letter
dated 09/11/2014. A presentation was made by Shri Beer Singh, representative of project
proponent along with their consultant M/s Grass Roots Research & Creation India (P) Ltd.
The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the
committee that:-
1. The environmental clearance is sought for Affordable Housing Project Khasra No-
2243, 2244, 2246, 2247, 2375, 2377, 2378, 2379, 2380, 2381, 2382, 2383, 2384,
2385, 2388, 2396, 2399, 2400, 2401, 2402, 2403, 2406, 2407, 2410, 2411, 2422,
Village Shahpur-Bamheta, Ghaziabad, U.P. M/s Utility Estates (P) Ltd., & Others.
2. Area details of the project is as follows:
S. No. Particulars Area (m2
)
1. Plot area 77,651
2. Area under Master Plan (Green + Road)/other land 2,865
3. Land in Possession 74,786
4. Area Under Green (@ 15% of Remaining Plot area) 11,217.900
5. Plot area (Land in possession – Green area) 63,568.100
6. Area Proposed for facilities 11,531
7. Facilities
a) Inter College 4,000
b) High School 2,000
c) Primary School 2,000
d) Nursery School 1,000
e) Health Centre 800
f) Sub Station (11 kVA) 500
g) Anganwadi 500
h) Sub Post Office 100
i) ATM 81
j) C.R.R.C 100
k) Dustbin 300
l) Kiosks 150
7. Net Plot Area 52,037.100
8. Permissible Ground Coverage (@ 45% of Net plot area) 23,416.695
9. Proposed Ground Coverage (@ 23.68% of Net plot area ) 12,325.434
10. Total Permissible FAR (@ 1.75+0.875 = 2.625)
• Basic FAR (@1.75 of Net plot area)
• Purchasable FAR (@ 50% of basic FAR i.e. 0.875)
1,36,597.388
91,064.925
45,532.463
11. Proposed FAR (@ 2.624) 1,36,561.955
12. Permissible incentive FAR against EWS & LIG 16,605.225
13. Proposed incentive FAR against EWS & LIG 16,597.034
14. Permissible Convenient Shopping (@ 0.5% of FAR) 682.987
15. Proposed Convenient Shopping 681.117
16. Stilt Area 10,023.165
17. Fire escape staircase 4,625.156
18. Mumty Area 679.258
19. Machine Room 795.652
20. Built up Area 1,80,813.22
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 60 of 62
3. Salient features of the project are as follows:
PROJECT FEATURES DESCRIPTION
Estimated Population 18,988 Nos.
Estimated Water Requirement
Construction Phase
Operation Phase
904 ML (Agency: Private Water Tanker)
1,606 KLD (Agency: Municipal Supply)
STP Capacity = 1600 KLD
Estimated waste water Generation Approx. 1348 KLD
Power Demand
Power Back-up
11,000 KVA
5,000 KVA (10 X 500 KVA each)
Source of Power Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited
Solid Waste Generation 9,174 kg/day
Rain water harvesting pits 11 Pits
Parking Facilities
Required
Proposed
As per MoEF norms: 1366 ECS
As per Ghaziabad bye-laws: 2449 ESS or 4898.00 m2
559 ECS
2450 ESS or 4900 m2
562 ECS
4. Water requirement of the project is as follows:
S.
N.
Description
Area
(in m2
)
Total Occupancy Rate of water
demand
(lpcd)
Total Water
Requirement
(KLD)
A. Domestic Water
1. Residential Development
• Main D.Us. 13,640 86 1173.04
• EWS 1,365 86 117.39
• LIG 1,365 86 117.39
• Incentive
Units against
EWS & LIG
1,695 86
145.77
2. Commercial Area
• Staff
23 30 0.69
3. Visitors 900 15 13.5
Total domestic water demand (1+2+3)= 1567.78 1568 KLD
B. Horticulture and Landscape
development
11217.920 11/sqm/day 11.22
C. DG Sets Cooling (10x500
KVA each)
0.9 l/KVA/hr 27
Grand Total (A+B+C) = 1606.22 say 1606 KLD
5. Solid waste generation details of the project is as follows:
S.N. Category Kg per capita per day Waste generated (kg/day)
1. Residents
• Main D.Us. (13,640) @ 0.5 6820
• EWS (1,365) @ 0.5 682.5
• LIG (1,365) @ 0.5 682.5
• Incentive EWS/LIG(1,695) @ 0.5 847.5
2. Commercial
• Staff (23)
@ 0.25 5.75
3. Visitors (900) @ 0.15 135
4. Landscape waste
(2.77 acres)
@ 0.2 kg/acre/day 0.55
TOTAL SOLID WASTE GENERATED 9,174 kg/day
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 61 of 62
6. The Project proposal falls under Category –8(b) of EIA Notification, 2006 (as
amended).
The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental clearance
to the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority for construction project and following specific conditions:
1. 5% land of total plot area should be allocated to pond.
2. Internal road should be as per Development Authority bye-laws.
3. Adequate green cover not less than 33% of the plotted area should be provided within
the premises.
4. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more
capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be
treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for
designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization.
5. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken with regular testing and monitoring
of treated water.
6. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to
be used in-house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving it to end
users. 7. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision
amounting to 2% of total project cost /4.0 crore in the matter, shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be
submitted to the authority. 8. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in
accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as amended).
9. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan
submitted.
10. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% solar lighting is to be
provided in the common areas/common stairs.
11. Parking guideline as per Ghaziabad Development Authority should be followed.
Parking for disabled persons should be explored.
12. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.
13. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from
the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.
14. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done
only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after
permission from CGWB.
15. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building.
16. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.
17. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase. 18. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.
19. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of residents.
20. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone to be
followed for construction work.
21. Dual plumbing should be adopted.
Minutes of 204th
SEAC Meeting Dated 21/02/2015
Page 62 of 62
22. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be
restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent
authority.
23. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any
buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.
24. Land scape plan with list of trees is to be submitted.
25. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In
case of default the Environmental Clearance will deem to be cancelled.
26. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for
construction.
27. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.
28. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose.
29. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc.
Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including
the proper treatment and the disposal of the wastes.
30. Running/maintenance cost of STP and other environmental facilities should be
computed and included into customer brochure.
(Dr. M. S. Khan)
Chairman, SEAC,UP
(Shri S. C. Brahmachari)
Member, SEAC, UP
(Dr. Asheesh Kumar Singh)
Member, SEAC, UP
(Sr. S.N. Singh)
Member, SEAC, UP
(Dr. S.K. Upadhayay)
Member, SEAC, UP
(Dr. D. C. Gupta)
Member, SEAC, UP