Final Bid Proposal for HCC Client Presentation July 23, 2008
12
LTTlearning specialists Final Bid Proposal for HCC Client Presentation July 23, 2008 Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
-
Upload
preston-puckett -
Category
Documents
-
view
32 -
download
0
description
Final Bid Proposal for HCC Client Presentation July 23, 2008 Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton. Review of Proposed Solution – Julie Online Courses Discussions (Video Conf or Classroom) Ongoing training. Overview of Process – Charlotte MS Project schedule shows phases - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Final Bid Proposal for HCC Client Presentation July 23, 2008
LTTlearning specialists
Final Bid Proposal for HCC
Client Presentation
July 23, 2008
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Review of Proposed Solution – Julie–Online Courses–Discussions (Video Conf or Classroom)–Ongoing training
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Overview of Process – Charlotte–MS Project schedule shows phases–Client Process Agreement
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Online Courses – Charlotte–Schedule and resources–Cost
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Two Options for Discussions – Greg−Instructor-led Classroom- Advantages
•Minimal up-front costs
•Traditional facilitation
•True face to face training
•No technology/maintenance
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Two Options for Discussions – Greg−Instructor-led Classroom- Disadvantages
•Travel Expenses for LTT trainer
•Cost/time to bring together remote employees
•Recurring cost/travel
•More difficult to schedule
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Two Options for Discussions – Greg–Video Conferencing – Advantages
•Easily bring together remote employees•Can be used outside of training at minimal additional cost
•Interviews•Company/team meetings•Future training•Client presentations
•Cost spread over many years•No travel expenses•Easy to schedule
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Two Options for Discussions – Greg–Video Conferencing – Disadvantages
•Considerable up-front costs
•More challenging for facilitation
•“Near” face to face
•Maintenance
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Cost – Onsite vs. Video Conference
Onsite Cost (over ten years)1. Training
• Eight 2-day sessions• Travel and trainer’s time
– Year one = $35,200– Year ten = $46,000– Training total = $406,000
2. Meetings – travel = +++3. Interviews - travel = +++4. Future Training = +++5. Other = +++
Grand Total = $406,000 +++
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Cost – Onsite vs. Video Conference
Video Conference (estimated)1. Installation at eight sites = $360,025
2. Recording = $100
3. Usage fee = 16 hours = $400
4. Maintenance = +++
Grand Total $360,525 +++
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Total Cost
Onsite vs. Video Conference
Onsite = $406,000
Video Conference = $360,525
LTTlearning specialists
Learning Plan for HCC
Greg Lea, Charlotte Taylor, & Julie Tipton
July 23, 2008
Summary and Next Steps – Julie
•We would ask you to sign the Client Process Agreement.
