FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
clint-narsi -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
![Page 1: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 1/13
Financial Operations 1 September 2012
The Examiner's Answers
F1 - Financial Operations
September 2012
Some of the answers that follow are fuller and more comprehensive than would be expected from a well- prepared candidate. They have been written in this way to aid teaching, study and revision for tutors and candidates alike.
SECTION A
Answers to Question One
Rationale
Question One consists of 10 objective test sub-questions. These are drawn from all sections ofthe syllabus. They are designed to examine breadth across the syllabus and thus cover many
learning outcomes.
1.1 C
1.2 A
1.3 A
1.4 A scheduler system of taxation is a system that has a number of schedules that sets out how the differenttypes of income should be treated for tax purposes.
1.5 C
1.6 B
1.7 To review new financial reporting issues, not specifically addressed in IFRSs.To clarify issues where unsatisfactory or conflicting interpretations have developed, with a view to reachinga consensus on the most appropriate treatment.
![Page 2: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 2/13
September 2012 2 Financial Operations
1.8$
Cost 420,000Duties
450,00030,000
Indexation (40%)630,000180,000
Selling price (700,000)Selling cost 10,000
GainTax at 25% 15,000
60,000
1.9 B
1.10 C
![Page 3: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 3/13
F1 September 2012 ANSWERS
Financial Operations 3 September 2012
SECTION B
Answers to Question Two
(a)
(i) PY Statement of comprehensive income for the year to 31 March 2012 – Taxation workings$000
Balance over-provided year to 31 March 2011 (1820 – 1795) (25)Charge for the year 1,980
Increase in deferred tax (560 – 540) 201,975
PY will charge $1,975,000 to its Statement of comprehensive income for taxation.
(ii)
The deferred tax provision is calculated using the latest estimate of future tax rates, the current rate usually beingthe best estimate of future rates. If a new rate is known to be likely to be introduced the new rate should be used.
If the rate of income tax were to be increased to 30% PY’s deferred tax provision would need to be increased to:
560/0.25x0.3 = 672
An increase of $112,000 in the year ended 31 March 2012.
Rationale
To test candidates’ understanding of the requirements of IAS 12 relating to treatment oftax in the financial statements and the calculation of deferred tax.
Tests learning outcome A4a.
Suggested Approach
Calculate PY’s tax charge for the year to 31 March 2012.Explain the effect the tax increase would have on deferred tax and calculate the amountof increase.
![Page 4: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 4/13
September 2012 4 Financial Operations
(b)
Rationale
To test candidates’ understanding of the treatment of overseas earnings and double taxrelief.
Tests learning outcome A2a.
Suggested Approach
Explain the three main methods of giving double taxation relief to entities with overseasearnings
The three main methods of giving double taxation relief are:
1. Exemption – the countries involved agree the types of income that will be exempt in one country or theother.
2. Deduction – the foreign tax is deducted from the foreign income and the net amount is taxable in thecountry of residence.
3. Tax credit – the tax paid in one country is allowed as a tax credit, at the lower tax rate (lower of the foreigntax rate and country of residence tax rate) in another country.
(c)
Rationale
To test candidates’ understanding of income tax calculations.
Tests learning outcome A3a.
Suggested Approach
Calculate the tax effect of disposal of old vehicle.Calculate the depreciation and tax allowance due on the new vehicle.Calculate SM’s taxable profit
Calculate tax due
$Profit before tax 43,000Entertaining 6,300Loss on disposal 1,000Depreciation 16,500New vehicle depreciation 4,000Tax depreciation (19,300)New vehicle tax depreciation (50%) (16,000) Tax at 25%
35,5008,875
SM is due to pay $8,875 tax for the year ended 31 March 2012
![Page 5: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 5/13
F1 September 2012 ANSWERS
Financial Operations 5 September 2012
(d)
Rationale
To test candidates’ understanding of the treatment of construction contracts, IAS 11, infinancial statements.
Tests learning outcome C2a.
Suggested Approach
Calculate overall profitability of contract.Calculate revenue and cost of sales for the year.Calculate amount due to client
Overall profitability:$000
Revenue 9,000 Total costPredicted loss
10,000(1,000)
Year to 31 March 2012:Revenue (9000 x 35%) 3,150Cost of sales in year (10000 x 35%) 3,500Loss in year (350)Additional expected loss (650)
(1,000)
Amount due to client:Cost to date (WIP) 4,000Total loss (1,000)Less cash receivedDue to client
(3,250)(250)
TY should include the following in its statement of comprehensive income for the year to 31 March 2012:
Revenue (9000 x 35%) 3,150
Cost of salesCost to date (10000 x 35%) 3,500Additional expected loss
4,150650
TY should include the following in its statement of financial position as at 31 March 2012:Under current liabilities:Amount due to client (250)
![Page 6: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 6/13
September 2012 6 Financial Operations
(e)
Rationale
To test candidates’ understanding of the development of an IFRS.
Tests learning outcome B1e.
Suggested Approach
Explain each of the five possible steps that an IFRS may go through duringdevelopment.
The IASB standard setting process can involve the following steps:• The IASB establishes an advisory committee to advise on the issues arising from the project. The IASB
consults with this committee and the IFRS advisory council throughout the development process.• IASB develops and publishes a Discussion Paper for public comment.• The IASB reviews the comments on the Discussion Paper and prepares and publishes an Exposure Draft
for public comment.• The comments on the Exposure Draft are reviewed by the IASB and if necessary the Exposure Draft is
amended before being issued as a final standard.• On occasion where there are significant changes to the exposure draft it may be reissued for further public
comment before being issued as a final standard.
![Page 7: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 7/13
F1 September 2012 ANSWERS
Financial Operations 7 September 2012
(f)
Rationale
To test candidates’ understanding of the treatment of situations by the audit report.
Tests learning outcome B1g.
Suggested Approach
Explain how each of the two situations would be treated by an auditor in the auditreport.
(i) Impact on the audit report
The inventory value is material, 30% of profit and 4.5% of revenue and there is a lack of evidence to support theinventory valuation it will impact on the audit report opinion.As the auditors have agreed with VB’s directors on the treatment of the court case it will not affect the audit reportopinion.
(ii) Modification of audit report
The auditors will have to issue a modified report for the inventory valuation as it is due to a material misstatementcaused by insufficient appropriate evidence. The modification required is a qualified opinion expressed as showinga true and fair view ‘except for’ the inventory valuation.
The auditors can issue an unqualified opinion for the court case. However there is material inherent uncertainty
over the outcome of the court case so the unqualified report would have to include a “fundamental uncertainty”emphasis of matter.
![Page 8: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 8/13
September 2012 8 Financial Operations
SECTION C
Question Three
Rationale
To test candidates’ ability to clear a suspense account.To test candidates’ ability to prepare a set of financial statements for a single entity,including the application of a number of IFRS/IAS.
Tests learning outcome C 2a and C1a.
Suggested Approach
Prepare journal entries to clear QWE’s suspense accountPrepare the non-current asset depreciation and development amortisation calculationsPrepare workings for cost of sales, administration and distribution costsPrepare all other required workingsPrepare the statement of comprehensive incomePrepare the statement of financial positionPrepare the statement of changes in equity
(a)QWEJournal entries to clear suspense:
Debit Credit$000 $000
Suspense account 15Plant and equipment disposal account 15Cash received on disposal of some plant and equipment
Research expense account 20Suspense account 20Research cost to be treated as an expense
(b)
QWE - Statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 March 2012$000 $000Revenue 2,220Cost of sales W3 (1,675)Gross Profit 545Administrative expenses W3 (295)Distribution costs W3 (72 (367)Profit from operations 178Finance cost W4 (20)Profit before tax 158Income tax expense W5 (116)Profit for the period 42
Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 March 2012
![Page 9: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 9/13
F1 September 2012 ANSWERS
Financial Operations 9 September 2012
QWE - Statement of Financial Position at 31 March 2012 $000 $000
Non-current assetsProperty, plant and equipment W1 2,301Deferred development expenditure W2 105
Current assetsInventory 214Trade receivables 98Cash and cash equivalents 42
Total assets
354
2,760
Equity and liabilitiesEquity
Share capital 930Share premium 310Retained earnings 601
Total equity 1,841
Non-current liabilitiesLong term borrowings 500Deferred tax 111
Total non-current liabilities 611
Current liabilitiesTrade payables 190Tax payable 83Provision legal claim 25Interest payable 10
Total current liabilitiesTotal equity and liabilities
3082,760
Workings (All figures in $000)
(W1) Non-current assets
Cost Land Buildings Plant and equipmentBalance b/fwd 800 1,610 560Disposal (W6) . . (82)Balance c/fwd 800 1,610 478
DepreciationBalance b/fwd 0 386 185Disposal (W6) . . (79)
0 386 106Year (1610x3%) 48Year [(478-106)x12.5%)] . . 47Balance c/f 0 434 153
Carrying Value 800 1,176 325Total P, P&E c/f 2,301
Equity shares
Share Premium
Retained Earnings
Total
$000 $000 $000 $000 Balance at 1 April 2011 930 310 621 1,861Statement of comprehensive income for year 42 42Dividend paid (62) (62)Balance at 31 March 2012 930 310 601 1,841
![Page 10: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 10/13
September 2012 10 Financial Operations
(W2) Deferred Development Expenditure
Balance b/f 150Years amortisation – 10% (15)Amortisation b/f (30)Balance c/f 105
(W3)Cost of sales Administration Distribution
Trial balance 1,605 190 72Amortisation development expenditure W2 15Research (from part (a) 20Depreciation – buildings W1 48Depreciation – plant and equipment W1 47Gain on disposal PPE W6 (12)Bad debt 32Legal claim . 25 .Totals 1,675 295 72
(W4) InterestYears loan interest (500x4%) 20Paid 10Accrued 10
(W5) Tax Last Year b/f 8Current year 83
91Increase in deferred tax 25
116
(W6) Disposal of plant and equipment
Cost 82Less depreciationCarrying value 3
(79)
ProceedsGain on disposal
(15) (12)
![Page 11: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 11/13
F1 September 2012 ANSWERS
Financial Operations 11 September 2012
Question Four
Rationale
To test candidates’ understanding of intra-group sales of non-current assets.
To test candidates’ ability to prepare a set of financial statements for a group of entities.
Tests learning outcomes C2b and C1b, c and d.
Suggested Approach
Explain the treatment of assets sold within a group.Calculate goodwill arising on acquisition of Plank.Calculate investment in associated entity Bush.Prepare workings for intra-group activities.Calculate consolidated retained earnings.
Prepare the consolidated statement of comprehensive incomePrepare consolidated statement of financial position.
(a)The sale to Plank must be recognised in the group consolidated accounts at carrying value, with no profitor loss recognised. Therefore the following adjustments need to be made:
• Cancel the profit on the sale - reduce consolidated profit for the year/consolidated retainedearnings by $20,000.
• Cancel the increase in depreciation [($95,000-$75,000)/10], $2,000 - increase consolidated profitfor the year/consolidated retained earnings by $2,000.
•
Reduce consolidated non-current assets – property, plant and equipment in the statement offinancial position by $20,000-$2,000 = $18,000.
(b)
Wood purchased all 6,000,000 shares in Plank on 1 April 2011.Investment of Wood in Plank
100% shares purchased therefore treat Plank as wholly owned subsidiary of Wood from 1 April 2011.
Wood purchased 1,540,000 of Bush’s 5,500,000 shares on 1 April 2011.Investment of Wood in Bush
This gave Wood 28% of Bush’s equity.As Wood has in excess of 20% of Bush’s equity and can exercise significant influence over all aspects ofBush’s strategic and operational decisions Wood will treat Bush as an associated entity from 1 April2011.
Workings (All workings in $000)
Equity Shares 6,000(i) Fair value of net assets of Plank at acquisition
Retained earnings 1,280Fair value adjustment 1,350
8,630
![Page 12: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 12/13
September 2012 12 Financial Operations
Cost 9,200(ii) Goodwill - Plank
Fair value of net assets acquired:Goodwill 570
8,630
ImpairmentBalance at 31 March 2012
(80)490
Cost 2,420(iii) Investment in associate - Bush
Add group share of post acquisition profits(1,240 - 410) = 830 x 28% = 232Investment at 31 March 2012 2,652
Mark up on cost 100% = 100/200 or 50% margin on selling price.(iv) Intra-group trading
Selling price 520; unrealised profit = 520 x 50% = 260All goods remain in inventory - 260
Dr. Cr.Consolidated cost of sales 260Consolidated current assets - inventory 260Consolidated revenue 520Consolidated cost of sales 520
Loan interestDr Cr
Accrue interest receivable by Wood:Receivables - interest 155Interest receivable - SoCI 155Receivables - interest 155Loan interest payable 155
Interest payable – SoCI 155Interest receivable -SoCI 155
Consolidated interest payable = (810+440-155) = 1,095Consolidated Receivables - interest (155 - 155) = 0
Consolidated Trade ReceivablesWood 13,400Plank 5,710Less intra-group sales (520)Less cheque in transit (210)
18,380
Consolidated Trade PayablesWood 3,910Plank 3,740Less intra-group sales (520)
(v) Excess depreciation
7,130
Fair value adjustment – 1,350Economic life 15 years, straight line basisExcess depreciation = 1,350/15 = 90
![Page 13: FIN OPERATIONS CIMA](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100505/577ce1371a28ab9e78b4ff82/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
7/29/2019 FIN OPERATIONS CIMA
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fin-operations-cima 13/13
F1 September 2012 ANSWERS
Financial Operations 13 September 2012
Balance – Wood at 1 April 2011 (5,400-3,490) 1,910(vi) Consolidated Retained Earnings
Add consolidated profit for yearBalance 31 Jan 2012
5,8297,739
Wood 11,820(vii) Consolidated Property, plant and equipment
Plank 7,240Adjustment for sale of asset, net (see (a)) (18)Fair value adjustment 1,350Excess depreciation (90)
20,302
Wood Group – Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for year ended 31 March 2012$000
Revenue(15,500+6,900-520) 21,880Cost of sales (8,700+3,080-520+260+90+20-2)
Gross profit 10,252
(11,628)
Expenses (1,250+750+80)Profit from operations 8,172
(2,080)
Share of profit of associated entity 232Finance costProfit before tax 7,309
(1,095)
Tax (1,250+230)Profit for the year
(1,480)5,829
Wood Group - Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 31 March 2012$000 $000
Non-Current Assets
Property, plant and equipment (vii) 20,302Goodwill (ii) 490Investment in associate (iii) 2,652
23,444Current AssetsInventory (12,060+3,215-260) 15,015Trade receivables (iv) 18,380Cash and cash equivalents (1,730+510+210) 2,450 Total assets
35,84559,289
Equity and Liabilities
Equity Shares 38,900Share premium 5,520Retained Earnings (vi) 7,739
52,159Current LiabilitiesTrade payables (iv) 7,130
59,289