FILE NUMBER Kent Grey, Partner 1 June 2012 Technology in Governance Risk-intelligent approach to the...
-
Upload
lydia-mckinney -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of FILE NUMBER Kent Grey, Partner 1 June 2012 Technology in Governance Risk-intelligent approach to the...
FILE NUMBER
Kent Grey, Partner
1 June 2012
Technology in Governance
Risk-intelligent approach to the use of technology “in the Boardroom”
Overview
•What is “technology in the Boardroom”?
• iPads
• Tape recorders/electronic recording devices
• Legal requirements for company record keeping
• Benefits of technology in Boardrooms
• Issues to consider
• Tips/traps
Company Records – Corporations Act 2001
• Requirement to keep minute books – s251A
• Requirement to keep written financial records – s286
• Electronic copies of company records are compliant if:
• secure from unauthorised access, theft, damage, destruction and falsification
• can be reproduced in a hard copy on demand
• can be accessed by those entitled to it
(s1306)
• A person must not conceal, destroy, mutilate or falsify company records (s1307)
Benefits of technology “in the Boardroom”
• Desirability and inevitability of technology “in the boardroom” driven by:
• Portability
• Ease of storing, accessing, searching board papers
• Rapid, timely dissemination of board papers (including updates)
• Convenience of access
• Cost savings/environmental considerations
• Implications are not just “in the boardroom”, but before and after the boardroom:
• company secretarial practices
• directors’ duties
Status of the Law
• Law lagging behind technology
• Use of technology in boardrooms largely untested by Courts
• limited guidance on electronic recordings
• Adverse implications might take some time to emerge
• Best practice tip: implement company policies outlining acceptable uses of technology in Board context
Security & confidentiality
• Materials sent outside the company:
• to private/personal e-mail addresses
• to other companies’ e-mail addresses
• Lack of external security measures
• Materials in “possession, custody, power” of other companies
• Materials captured by other companies’ e-mail systems
• Materials subject to other companies’ document retention policies and security measures (or lack thereof).
Security & confidentiality
• How confidential is the material?
• What is the commercial damage, if materials fall into wrong hands?
• Does the company lose important legal protections?
• ASX Listing Rule 3.1A.2 (ie; the “confidentiality” exception to continuous disclosure)
• Legal Professional Privilege
• Should you restrict ability to save locally or print materials?
• Best practice: encryption, security measures
Directors’ duties
• Centro case (ASIC v Healey & Ors (2011))
• “It is the Board’s responsibility to determine the information that it requires or does not require”
• Directors’ defence relied on volume and complexity of information supplied to board
• Court held:
• Board has ability to control amount and format of information received
• Directors are required to take into account all the information they receive, when performing their duties.
Presentation & delivery of information
• Be wary of exponential increase in volume of information provided for Board’s review
• Be mindful of how information is conveyed;
• content
• presentation
• accessibility
• Are these best not provided in electronic form?
• documents with links to other documents
• financial spreadsheets
• information in larger-than-A4 format (maps, charts)
Reliability of access to electronic materials
•Directors (and ex-directors) have some rights to access board papers:
• common law
• Corporations Act (s198F, s290)
• contract (deeds of access, indemnity & insurance)
• Implement appropriate data protection measures:• security
• back-up/redundancy
• DRP
• Best practice tip: retain one hard copy of board papers and minutes.
Return of Board materials
• Policies requiring return of board materials after meetings
• Deletion from iPads may be problematic:
• backup storage on local devices;
• cloud computing
• ongoing security/confidentiality risks
• Litigation risk (discovery)
Directors’ notes & annotations
• Increasingly important to demonstrate discharge of directors’ duties
• duty of care and diligence – s180(1)
• Business Judgment Rule - s180(2)
• Personal property of director(?)
• Not automatically company “property” (but may be in company’s possession, custody or power)
• Company policies on retention of annotations for future evidentiary purposes
• Discoverability of annotations on board papers.
Tape recording board meetings
• Use of tape recordings in board meetings:
• by company secretary/minute-taker
• by participants at the meeting
• Listening and Surveillance Devices Act 1972 (SA)
• consent required to electronically record private conversations
• exception: for protection of a “lawful interest”
• Alliance Craton Explorer v Quasar Resources (2010)
Conclusion: Tips for use of technology
It is good governance and best practice to:
• Consider “user-friendly” formatting
• Ensure manageable volume of materials is distributed• don’t bombard directors with too much information
• Ensure management of materials remains professional• don’t make late changes, just because they can be
distributed easily at the last minute
• Give directors a choice as to medium of delivery of materials
• financials, spreadsheets & maps may be better in hard copy