FIGURE 1 – EXPLORATION SITE PLAN Karst Evaluation Cross ...€¦ · N=21 7-11-13 N=24 13-10-12...

FIGURE 1 – EXPLORATION SITE PLANKarst EvaluationCross Hollow Quarry ■ Benton County, ArkansasJune 18, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. 04195028.1

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH PROVIDED BY GOOGLE EARTH PRO

jdelson

Cloud

jdelson

Rectangle

jdelson

Rectangle

jdelson

Typewriter

LEGEND

jdelson

Typewriter

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Typewriter

ERI Test Location

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Typewriter

MASW Test Location

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Typewriter

MASW Effective Model

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Typewriter

Boring Location

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Text Box

MASW 1

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 7

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 6

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 5

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 8

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 4

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 1

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 2

jdelson

Text Box

ERI 3

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

0'

jdelson

Typewriter

Start of Test Location

jdelson

Oval

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Cloud

jdelson

Typewriter

Previously Mined/Disturbed Area

Legend Notes Figure 2 - Resistivity Profile - Lines 1, 2 & 31. Profile Scales Horizontal/Vertical: 1" = 50' Project: Cross Hollow Quarry

Karst EvaluationClient: Anchor Stone CompanyLocation: Benton County, ARProject No.: 04195028.1Date: March 27, 2019

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650Feet along line

Line 1

-125

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400Feet along line

Line 2

-75

-50

-25

0

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375Feet along line

Line 3

-75

-50

-25

0

22.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.933.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94

Res

istiv

ity (1

0n O

hm-m

)

n

jdelson

Text Box

B-1

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Callout

Bedrock encountered at 11.7 ft. in boring.

jdelson

Callout

Low resistivity anomaly. Rock core showed a decrease in RQD in this area.

jdelson

Callout

Low resistivity anomaly. Possible fractured zone.

jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Callout

Possible bedrock cutter.

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Text Box

Bedrock Anomaly

jdelson

Text Box

Approximate Top of Bedrock

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Text Box

Boring Location/Stratigraphic Column

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Text Box

B-1

Legend Notes Figure 3 - Resistivity Profile - Lines 4, 5 & 61. Profile Scales Horizontal/Vertical: 1" = 50' Project: Cross Hollow Quarry

Karst EvaluationClient: Anchor Stone CompanyLocation: Benton County, ARProject No.: 04195028.1Date: March 27, 2019

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650Feet along line

Line 4

-125

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

Dep

th (f

eet)

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475Feet along line

Line 5

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400Feet along line

Line 6

-75

-50

-25

0

22.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.933.13.23.33.43.53.63.73.83.94

Res

istiv

ity (1

0n O

hm-m

)

n

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Text Box

Bedrock Anomaly

jdelson

Text Box


jdelson

Text Box

B-2

jdelson

Text Box

B-4

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Callout

Bedrock encountered at 46 ft. in boring.

jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Callout

Low resistivity anomaly. Possible fractured zone/clay seam.

jdelson

Text Box

B-3

jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Text Box


jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Text Box

B-1

Legend Notes Figure 4 - Resistivity Profiles - Line 7 & 81. Profile Scales Horizontal/Vertical: 1" = 30'2. Profile represents a clipped portionof a longer line

Project: Cross Hollow Quarry Karst EvaluationClient: Anchor Stone CompanyLocation: Benton County, ARProject No.: 04195028.1Date: March 27, 2019

280 305 330 355 380 405 430 455 480 505 530 555 580Feet along line

Line 7

-60

-40

-20

0

Dep

th (f

eet)

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4

Resitivity (10n Ohm-m)

n

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400Feet along line

Line 8

-75

-50

-25

0

Dep

th (f

eet)

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Line

jdelson

Text Box

Bedrock Anomaly

jdelson

Text Box


jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Callout

Very low resistivity anomaly. Poor contact resistance during data acquisition resulted in poor data quality on ERI Line 7. Boring B-5 indicated a slight decrease in RQD below approximately 30 feet below ground surface. The lower RQD correlates with the low resistivity anomaly, although the anomaly is greatly exaggerated.

jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Polygon Line

jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Text Box

B-5

jdelson

Text Box


jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Text Box

B-1

Legend Notes

Project: Cross Hollow QuarryClient: Anchor StoneLocation: Benton County, ArkansasProject No.: 04195028.1Date: May 24, 2019

Figure 4 - MASW Line 11. Profile Scale: Horizontal/Vertical - 1" = 30'

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500 4500

4500

4500

4500 4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

450045

00

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

4500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430 440

Feet along line

Line 1

-150

-140

-130

-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

Dept

h (ft

)

2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec)

jdelson

Text Box


jdelson

Line

jdelson

Text Box

B-5

jdelson

Callout


jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Stamp

jdelson

Text Box

B-1

8.5

11.8

80.7

3-7-6N=13

2-8-5N=13

100

97

93

92

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

98

100

100

100

91

80

93

92

80

93

90

88

65

68

88

87

73

82

83

40

58

CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC), red

GRAVELLY FAT CLAY (CH), red

LIMESTONE, with chert nodules and layers, gray, medium to coarse-grained,slightly fractured, medium to thick bedding, slightly weathered, medium strong

Boring Terminated at 80.7 Feet

Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.

THIS

BOR

ING

LOG

ISN

OT

VALI

DIF

SEPA

RAT

EDFR

OM

OR

IGIN

ALR

EPO

RT.

GEO

SMAR

TLO

G-N

OW

ELL

0419

5028

-CR

OSS

HO

LLO

WQ

UAR

RY.

GPJ

MO

DEL

LAYE

R.G

PJ6/

7/19

DEPTH

WAT

ERLE

VEL

OBS

ERVA

TIO

NS

DEP

TH(F

t.)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

FIEL

DTE

STR

ESU

LTS

Rec

over

y(%

)

1425 Old WIre Road Benton County, ArkansasSITE:

Page 1 of 1

Advancement Method:CFA 4.5" O.D. to auger refusal follow with NQ rock core 2" I.D.

Abandonment Method:Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.

Notes:

Project No.: 04195028.1

Drill Rig: 726

Boring Started: 03-20-2019

BORING LOG NO. B-1Anchor Stone CompanyCLIENT:Tulsa, Oklahoma

Driller: DH

Boring Completed: 03-20-2019

Exhibit: A-1

See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures.

See Appendix B for description of laboratoryprocedures and additional data (if any).See Appendix C for explanation of symbols andabbreviations.

PROJECT: Cross Hollow Quarry - Karst Evaluation

9522 E 47th Pl, Ste DTulsa, OK

WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONSNo free water observed

RQ

D(%

)

LABO

RAT

OR

YH

P(ts

f)

WAT

ERC

ON

TEN

T(%

)LOCATION See Exhibit A-2

Latitude: 36.2748° Longitude: -94.1068°

GR

APH

ICLO

G

SAM

PLE

TYPE

8.5

13.5

18.5

28.5

38.5

46.0

80.0

7-10-19N=29

7-11-13N=24

4-7-10N=17

7-9-7N=16

5-7-11N=18

1-5-3N=8

100

100

100

100

92

60

15

40

65

77

100

68

29

0

42

49

50

42

69

68



FAT CLAY WITH GRAVEL (CH), red



CLAYEY GRAVEL (GC), brown


Void from 72.5 to 74.5 feet.

No recovery from 76.7 to 80 feet due to tooling malfunction.

Boring Terminated at 80 Feet


THIS

BOR

ING

LOG

ISN

OT

VALI

DIF

SEPA

RAT

EDFR

OM

OR

IGIN

ALR

EPO

RT.

GEO

SMAR

TLO

G-N

OW

ELL

0419

5028

-CR

OSS

HO

LLO

WQ

UAR

RY.

GPJ

MO

DEL

LAYE

R.G

PJ6/

7/19

DEPTH

WAT

ERLE

VEL

OBS

ERVA

TIO

NS

DEP

TH(F

t.)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

FIEL

DTE

STR

ESU

LTS

Rec

over

y(%

)


Page 1 of 1



Notes:

Project No.: 04195028.1

Drill Rig: 726



Driller: DH


Exhibit: A-2






RQ

D(%

)

LABO

RAT

OR

YH

P(ts

f)

WAT

ERC

ON

TEN

T(%



GR

APH

ICLO

G

SAM

PLE

TYPE

18.5

42.042.5

4-11-11N=22

8-15-12N=27

20-14-13N=27

5-14-9N=23

4-11-13N=24

6-6-9N=15

3-5-7N=12

Auger refusal on apparent cobble, boulder or bedrock at 42.5 feet.

35

37

37

43

38

37

62



LIMESTONE, grayAuger Refusal at 42.5 Feet


THIS

BOR

ING

LOG

ISN

OT

VALI

DIF

SEPA

RAT

EDFR

OM

OR

IGIN

ALR

EPO

RT.

GEO

SMAR

TLO

G-N

OW

ELL

0419

5028

-CR

OSS

HO

LLO

WQ

UAR

RY.

GPJ

MO

DEL

LAYE

R.G

PJ6/

7/19

DEPTH

WAT

ERLE

VEL

OBS

ERVA

TIO

NS

DEP

TH(F

t.)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

FIEL

DTE

STR

ESU

LTS

Rec

over

y(%

)


Page 1 of 1

Advancement Method:CFA 4.5" O.D. to auger refusal


Notes:

Project No.: 04195028.1

Drill Rig: 726



Driller: DH


Exhibit: A-3






RQ

D(%

)

LABO

RAT

OR

YH

P(ts

f)

WAT

ERC

ON

TEN

T(%



GR

APH

ICLO

G

SAM

PLE

TYPE

13.5

18.5

28.5

36.036.5

5-18-50N=68

6-8-13N=21

7-11-13N=24

13-10-12N=22

5-7-10N=17

6-6-6N=12

Auger refusal on apparent cobble, boulder or bedrock at 36.5 feet.

39

44

27

30

30

45





LIMESTONE, grayAuger Refusal at 36.5 Feet


THIS

BOR

ING

LOG

ISN

OT

VALI

DIF

SEPA

RAT

EDFR

OM

OR

IGIN

ALR

EPO

RT.

GEO

SMAR

TLO

G-N

OW

ELL

0419

5028

-CR

OSS

HO

LLO

WQ

UAR

RY.

GPJ

MO

DEL

LAYE

R.G

PJ6/

7/19

DEPTH

WAT

ERLE

VEL

OBS

ERVA

TIO

NS

DEP

TH(F

t.)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

FIEL

DTE

STR

ESU

LTS

Rec

over

y(%

)


Page 1 of 1

Advancement Method:CFA 4.5" O.D. to auger refusal


Notes:

Project No.: 04195028.1

Drill Rig: 726



Driller: DH


Exhibit: A-4






RQ

D(%

)

LABO

RAT

OR

YH

P(ts

f)

WAT

ERC

ON

TEN

T(%



GR

APH

ICLO

G

SAM

PLE

TYPE

3.0

60.3

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

72

77

90

78

97

68

57

70

65

62

75

46



Boring Terminated at 60.25 Feet


THIS

BOR

ING

LOG

ISN

OT

VALI

DIF

SEPA

RAT

EDFR

OM

OR

IGIN

ALR

EPO

RT.

GEO

SMAR

TLO

G-N

OW

ELL

0419

5028

-CR

OSS

HO

LLO

WQ

UAR

RY.

GPJ

MO

DEL

LAYE

R.G

PJ6/

7/19

DEPTH

WAT

ERLE

VEL

OBS

ERVA

TIO

NS

DEP

TH(F

t.)

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

FIEL

DTE

STR

ESU

LTS

Rec

over

y(%

)


Page 1 of 1



Notes:

Project No.: 04195028.1

Drill Rig: 726



Driller: DH


Exhibit: A-5






RQ

D(%

)

LABO

RAT

OR

YH

P(ts

f)

WAT

ERC

ON

TEN

T(%



GR

APH

ICLO

G

SAM

PLE

TYPE

Geotechnical Engineering ReportCross Hollow Quarry ■ Benton County, ArkansasProject No. 04195028.1


0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

Boring B-1Depth: 12.0’ to 22.0’


0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

Scale In Feet



Scale In Feet



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

Scale In Feet


Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ ReliableScale In Feet



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

Scale In Feet



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0


Boring B-5Depth: 3’ to 75.25’

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

Scale In Feet



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

Scale In Feet



Scale In Feet



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0



0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

Scale In Feet




0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Scale In Feet

GENERAL NOTES

naarens

Rectangle

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

UNIFIED SOI L CLASSI FICATI ON SYSTEM

Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests ASoil Classification

GroupSymbol Group Name B

Coarse-Grained Soils:More than 50% retainedon No. 200 sieve

Gravels:More than 50% ofcoarse fractionretained on No. 4 sieve

Clean Gravels:Less than 5% fines C

Cu ³ 4 and 1 £ Cc £ 3 E GW Well-graded gravel F

Cu < 4 and/or [Cc<1 or Cc>3.0] E GP Poorly graded gravel F

Gravels with Fines:More than 12% fines C

Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F, G, H

Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel F, G, H

Sands:50% or more of coarsefraction passes No. 4sieve

Clean Sands:Less than 5% fines D

Cu ³ 6 and 1 £ Cc £ 3 E SW Well-graded sand I

Cu < 6 and/or [Cc<1 or Cc>3.0] E SP Poorly graded sand I

Sands with Fines:More than 12% fines D

Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G, H, I

Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G, H, I

Fine-Grained Soils:50% or more passes theNo. 200 sieve

Silts and Clays:Liquid limit less than 50

Inorganic:PI > 7 and plots on or above “A”line J

CL Lean clay K, L, M

PI < 4 or plots below “A” line J ML Silt K, L, M

Organic:Liquid limit - oven dried

< 0.75 OL Organic clay K, L, M, N

Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K, L, M, O

Silts and Clays:Liquid limit 50 or more

Inorganic:PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clay K, L, M

PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic Silt K, L, M

Organic:Liquid limit - oven dried

< 0.75 OH Organic clay K, L, M, P

Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K, L, M, Q

Highly organic soils: Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT PeatA Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve.B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles

or boulders, or both” to group name.C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded

gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorlygraded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay.

D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-gradedsand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly gradedsand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay.

E Cu = D60/D10 Cc =6010

230

DxD

)(D

F If soil contains ³ 15% sand, add “with sand” to group name.G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM.

H If fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name.I If soil contains ³ 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name.J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay.K If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or “with

gravel,” whichever is predominant.L If soil contains ³ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add

“sandy” to group name.MIf soil contains ³ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add

“gravelly” to group name.NPI ³ 4 and plots on or above “A” line.OPI < 4 or plots below “A” line.P PI plots on or above “A” line.QPI plots below “A” line.

DESCRIPTION OF ROCK PROPERTIES

ROCK VERSION 1

WEATHERINGTerm DescriptionUnweathered No visible sign of rock material weathering, perhaps slight discoloration on major discontinuity surfaces.Slightlyweathered

Discoloration indicates weathering of rock material and discontinuity surfaces. All the rock material may bediscolored by weathering and may be somewhat weaker externally than in its fresh condition.

Moderatelyweathered

Less than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock ispresent either as a continuous framework or as corestones.

Highlyweathered

More than half of the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or discolored rock ispresent either as a discontinuous framework or as corestones.

Completelyweathered All rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated to soil. The original mass structure is still largely intact.

Residual soil All rock material is converted to soil. The mass structure and material fabric are destroyed. There is a largechange in volume, but the soil has not been significantly transported.

STRENGTH OR HARDNESS

Description Field Identification Uniaxial CompressiveStrength, psi (MPa)

Extremely weak Indented by thumbnail 40-150 (0.3-1)

Very weak Crumbles under firm blows with point of geological hammer, can bepeeled by a pocket knife 150-700 (1-5)

Weak rock Can be peeled by a pocket knife with difficulty, shallow indentationsmade by firm blow with point of geological hammer 700-4,000 (5-30)

Medium strong Cannot be scraped or peeled with a pocket knife, specimen can befractured with single firm blow of geological hammer 4,000-7,000 (30-50)

Strong rock Specimen requires more than one blow of geological hammer tofracture it 7,000-15,000 (50-100)

Very strong Specimen requires many blows of geological hammer to fracture it 15,000-36,000 (100-250)Extremely strong Specimen can only be chipped with geological hammer >36,000 (>250)

DISCONTINUITY DESCRIPTIONFracture Spacing (Joints, Faults, Other Fractures) Bedding Spacing (May Include Foliation or Banding)

Description Spacing Description SpacingExtremely close < ¾ in (<19 mm) Laminated < ½ in (<12 mm)

Very close ¾ in – 2-1/2 in (19 - 60 mm) Very thin ½ in – 2 in (12 – 50 mm)Close 2-1/2 in – 8 in (60 – 200 mm) Thin 2 in – 1 ft. (50 – 300 mm)

Moderate 8 in – 2 ft. (200 – 600 mm) Medium 1 ft. – 3 ft. (300 – 900 mm)Wide 2 ft. – 6 ft. (600 mm – 2.0 m) Thick 3 ft. – 10 ft. (900 mm – 3 m)

Very Wide 6 ft. – 20 ft. (2.0 – 6 m) Massive > 10 ft. (3 m)Discontinuity Orientation (Angle): Measure the angle of discontinuity relative to a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of thecore. (For most cases, the core axis is vertical; therefore, the plane perpendicular to the core axis is horizontal.) For example, ahorizontal bedding plane would have a 0-degree angle.

ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION (RQD) 1

Description RQD Value (%)Very Poor 0 - 25

Poor 25 – 50Fair 50 – 75

Good 75 – 90Excellent 90 - 100

1. The combined length of all sound and intact core segments equal to or greater than 4 inches in length, expressed as apercentage of the total core run length.

Reference: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Publication No FHWA-NHI-10-034, December 2009Technical Manual for Design and Construction of Road Tunnels – Civil Elements

DRILLINGLOG

ATOKA, INC.554 Mid-America Blvd, HOT SPRINGS, AR 71913OFFICE: 501-623-1121 FAX: 501-623-2769 SHEET 1 OF 2

DATE STARTED10/15/19

DATE COMPLETED10/16/19

JOB NUMBER19-293

BORING NUMBERMW -1

PURPOSE OF BORINGHydrogeology

PROJECTCross Hollow Quarry Hydrogeology Evaluation

DRILL RIG TYPESchramm Air Rotary

SIZE AND TYPE OF SAMPLER AND/OR BITS6” rotary Bit

DRILLING AGENCY

DRILLER: Clear Water DrillingLICENSE #: 23245

SAMPLES SENT TO LAB FOR TESTING

N/A

LOCATION: Lowell AR

Lat 36.27194Lon -94.10609

SPECIAL FIELD TEST CONDUCTED

Well Capacity : 5 gpm (by air flushing observation)

DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (TBM OR MSL)1333 ft MSL

WATER LEVEL ELEVATION (FROM TOC)DURING DRILLING AFTER 48 HOUR

DATE 10/18/19DEPTH 37 ft.

ELEVATION 1296 ft MSL

ELEVATION TOP OF BORING

1333 MSL

DIRECTION OF BORING FROMVERTICALX VERTICAL INCLINED BEARING

SOIL CLASSICIFICATIONX Soils field classified in accordance with the Unified Soil

Classification SystemSoils lab Classified

TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING: 300 ft

TOTAL NUMBER OF LITHOLOGIC SAMPLES TAKENGrab Split Spoon Shelby Tube Core Other

LOGGED BY: Tim Hill 0 -180’, Aaron Holder 180’-300’

LOCATION SKETCH

MW -1 LocationMW -1 Location

Diamondhead Test Well #1

MW -1 Location

DRILLING LOGATOKA, INC.554 Mid-America Blvd, HOT SPRINGS, AR 71913OFFICE: 501-623-1121 FAX: 501-623-2769

SHEET 2 OF 2Well NUMBER

Mw - 1

PROJECT

Cross Hollow Quarry

ELEVATION TOP OF CASING

1333 MSL

LOGGED BY

Tim Hill & Aaron Holder

DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTIONUSCSUSGS

SAMPLEINTERVAL

WELL COMPLETION DIAGRAM REMARKS

Feetbgs

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

Gray Limestone with ChertNodules Boone/ST. Joe Limestone

Black Pyritic ShaleChattanooga Shale

300’

20’

37’

Water Level

Cement &

PVC Casing

6” Open Hole

Flow 0.5 gpm

@ 80’

MW

Flow 5.5 gpm

@ 105’

APPENDIX E SOIL SURVEY

United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture

A product of the NationalCooperative Soil Survey,a joint effort of the UnitedStates Department ofAgriculture and otherFederal agencies, Stateagencies including theAgricultural ExperimentStations, and localparticipants

Custom Soil Resource Report for

Benton County, Arkansas

NaturalResourcesConservationService

November 15, 2019

PrefaceSoil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

2

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/

https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

3

ContentsPreface.................................................................................................................... 2How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8

Soil Map................................................................................................................9Legend................................................................................................................10Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11

Benton County, Arkansas............................................................................... 13Eg—Elsah soils, occasionally and frequently flooded................................. 13NfC—Nixa very gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes.............................15NoF—Noark very gravelly silt loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes......................16

References............................................................................................................18

4

How Soil Surveys Are MadeSoil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

5

scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report

6

identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.


7

Soil MapThe soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

8

9

Custom Soil Resource ReportSoil Map

4014

800

4014

900

4015

000

4015

100

4015

200

4015

300

4015

400

4015

500

4015

600

4014

800

4014

900

4015

000

4015

100

4015

200

4015

300

4015

400

4015

500

4015

600

400200 400300 400400 400500 400600 400700 400800

400200 400300 400400 400500 400600 400700 400800

36° 16' 50'' N94

° 6

' 40'

' W36° 16' 50'' N

94° 6

' 14'

' W

36° 16' 21'' N

94° 6

' 40'' W

36° 16' 21'' N

94° 6

' 14'' W

N

Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS840 200 400 800 1200

Feet0 50 100 200 300

MetersMap Scale: 1:4,310 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)

SoilsSoil Map Unit Polygons

Soil Map Unit Lines

Soil Map Unit Points

Special Point FeaturesBlowout

Borrow Pit

Clay Spot

Closed Depression

Gravel Pit

Gravelly Spot

Landfill

Lava Flow

Marsh or swamp

Mine or Quarry

Miscellaneous Water

Perennial Water

Rock Outcrop

Saline Spot

Sandy Spot

Severely Eroded Spot

Sinkhole

Slide or Slip

Sodic Spot

Spoil Area

Stony Spot

Very Stony Spot

Wet Spot

Other

Special Line Features

Water FeaturesStreams and Canals

TransportationRails

Interstate Highways

US Routes

Major Roads

Local Roads

BackgroundAerial Photography

The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)

Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Benton County, ArkansasSurvey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 16, 2019

Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 10, 2019—Sep 15, 2019

The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.


10

Map Unit Legend

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

Eg Elsah soils, occasionally and frequently flooded

4.0 5.0%

NfC Nixa very gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes

24.6 30.7%

NoF Noark very gravelly silt loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes

51.5 64.3%

Totals for Area of Interest 80.0 100.0%

Map Unit DescriptionsThe map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.

A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.

The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or


11

landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities.

Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.

Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.

Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.

A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.

An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.


12

Benton County, Arkansas

Eg—Elsah soils, occasionally and frequently flooded

Map Unit SettingNational map unit symbol: lyypElevation: 340 to 1,500 feetMean annual precipitation: 42 to 51 inchesMean annual air temperature: 47 to 70 degrees FFrost-free period: 183 to 239 daysFarmland classification: Not prime farmland

Map Unit CompositionElsah and similar soils: 70 percentElsah and similar soils: 25 percentMinor components: 5 percentEstimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Elsah

SettingLandform: Flood plainsLandform position (two-dimensional): ToeslopeLandform position (three-dimensional): TalfDown-slope shape: ConvexAcross-slope shape: LinearParent material: Gravelly alluvium

Typical profileA - 0 to 7 inches: extremely gravelly silt loamC - 7 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly silt loam

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 0 to 3 percentDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesNatural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drainedRunoff class: LowCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to

high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)Depth to water table: More than 80 inchesFrequency of flooding: OccasionalFrequency of ponding: NoneSalinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0

mmhos/cm)Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.4 inches)

Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 3sHydrologic Soil Group: BEcological site: Sandy/Gravelly Floodplain Forest (F116AY042MO)Hydric soil rating: No


13

Description of Elsah

SettingLandform: Flood plainsLandform position (two-dimensional): ToeslopeLandform position (three-dimensional): TalfDown-slope shape: LinearAcross-slope shape: LinearParent material: Gravelly alluvium

Typical profileA - 0 to 7 inches: extremely gravelly silt loamC - 7 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly silt loam

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 0 to 3 percentDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesNatural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drainedRunoff class: LowCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to

high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)Depth to water table: More than 80 inchesFrequency of flooding: FrequentFrequency of ponding: NoneSalinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0


Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 5wHydrologic Soil Group: BEcological site: Sandy/Gravelly Floodplain Forest (F116AY042MO)Hydric soil rating: No

Minor Components

AquentsPercent of map unit: 5 percentLandform: DepressionsLandform position (two-dimensional): BackslopeLandform position (three-dimensional): MountainflankDown-slope shape: ConcaveAcross-slope shape: ConvexHydric soil rating: Yes


14

NfC—Nixa very gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes

Map Unit SettingNational map unit symbol: 2rk3tElevation: 920 to 1,530 feetMean annual precipitation: 39 to 49 inchesMean annual air temperature: 54 to 59 degrees FFrost-free period: 172 to 232 daysFarmland classification: Not prime farmland

Map Unit CompositionNixa and similar soils: 90 percentMinor components: 10 percentEstimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Nixa

SettingLandform: HillslopesLandform position (two-dimensional): BackslopeLandform position (three-dimensional): Side slopeDown-slope shape: LinearAcross-slope shape: LinearParent material: Slope alluvium over pedisediment over residuum weathered from

limestone

Typical profileOi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant materialA - 1 to 3 inches: very gravelly silt loamE - 3 to 10 inches: very gravelly silt loamBE - 10 to 20 inches: very gravelly silt loam2Btx - 20 to 43 inches: very gravelly silt loam3Bt - 43 to 79 inches: very gravelly clay

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 3 to 8 percentDepth to restrictive feature: 11 to 30 inches to fragipanNatural drainage class: Moderately well drainedRunoff class: Very highCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately

low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)Depth to water table: About 9 to 28 inchesFrequency of flooding: NoneFrequency of ponding: NoneSalinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.1 to 2.0

mmhos/cm)Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 1.9 inches)


15

Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 4sHydrologic Soil Group: DEcological site: Low-Base Chert Upland Woodland (F116BY004MO), Low-Base

Chert Upland Woodland (F116AY012MO)Other vegetative classification: Trees/Timber (Woody Vegetation)Hydric soil rating: No

Minor Components

BendavisPercent of map unit: 10 percentLandform: InterfluvesLandform position (two-dimensional): ShoulderLandform position (three-dimensional): InterfluveDown-slope shape: LinearAcross-slope shape: LinearEcological site: Low-Base Chert Protected Backslope Woodland (F116AY013MO),

Low-Base Chert Exposed Backslope Woodland (F116AY049MO)Other vegetative classification: Trees/Timber (Woody Vegetation)Hydric soil rating: No

NoF—Noark very gravelly silt loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes

Map Unit SettingNational map unit symbol: 2t7dkElevation: 480 to 1,680 feetMean annual precipitation: 39 to 49 inchesMean annual air temperature: 54 to 59 degrees FFrost-free period: 172 to 232 daysFarmland classification: Not prime farmland

Map Unit CompositionNoark and similar soils: 90 percentMinor components: 10 percentEstimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Noark

SettingLandform: HillslopesLandform position (two-dimensional): BackslopeLandform position (three-dimensional): Side slopeDown-slope shape: ConvexAcross-slope shape: ConvexParent material: Slope alluvium over residuum weathered from limestone

Typical profileOi - 0 to 1 inches: slightly decomposed plant material


16

A - 1 to 4 inches: very gravelly silt loamE - 4 to 12 inches: very gravelly silt loamBE - 12 to 22 inches: very gravelly silty clay loam2Bt - 22 to 79 inches: very gravelly silty clay

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 20 to 40 percentPercent of area covered with surface fragments: 0.0 percentDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesNatural drainage class: Well drainedRunoff class: HighCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to

moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)Depth to water table: More than 80 inchesFrequency of flooding: NoneFrequency of ponding: NoneSalinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0


Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 7eHydrologic Soil Group: CEcological site: Low-Base Chert Protected Backslope Woodland (F116AY013MO),


Minor Components

BendavisPercent of map unit: 10 percentLandform: HillslopesLandform position (two-dimensional): BackslopeLandform position (three-dimensional): Head slopeDown-slope shape: LinearAcross-slope shape: LinearEcological site: Low-Base Chert Protected Backslope Woodland (F116AY013MO),



17

ReferencesAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262

Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577

Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580

Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

18

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262






http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053624

United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf


19

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242



http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf

APPENDIX F WATER WELL RECORDS

B CASING FROM 0 TO 47 W/ 6.25 Inner Diameter

CASING FROM TO W/ Inner Diameter

TYPE CASING PVC

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

4. GRAVEL PACK FROM: FT TO: FT

5. BACK FILLED WITH: cement

FROM: 0 FT TO: 47 FT

6. SEALED WITH:

FROM: FT TO: FT

7. DISINFECTED WITH: CHLORINE8. USE OF WELL:

DOMESTIC

OTHER

A/C HEATPUMP TYPE WELLS

(For A/C only)Will system also be used for purposes other than Heating and Air Conditioning?

If yes, name use:

(For A/C open-loop only) Into what medium is water returned?

11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS

REPORT ON WATER WELL CONSTRUCTION & PUMP INSTALLATIONMAIN MENU RESET SUBMIT

A1. Contractor Name & Number: 1126 CAIN WELL DRILLING

2. Driller Name & Number: 2269 LARRY CAIN

3. Pump Installer Name & Number:

4. Date Well Completed: 06/21/1995 New Well

5. COUNTY : BENTON ( 007 )6 FRACTION SE ¼ of SE ¼

7 SECTION: 31

8 TOWNSHIP 19N

9 RANGE 29W

11. LONGITUDE 94-06-04 12. LATITUDE 36-16-03

DESCRIPTIONOF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER BEARING

IF YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

CL 0 40 No

SH 295 300 No

2. TOTAL DEPTH OF WELL 300

3. STATIC WATER LEVEL 65 Ft. below land surface

4. YIELD 0 gallons per Y

5. DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE 6 IN

C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP

2 SETTING DEPTH FEET

3 BRAND NAME AND SERIAL NUMBERS:

4 RATED CAPACITY gallons per minute

5 TYPE LUBRICATION

6 DROP PIPE OR COLUMN PIPE SIZE

7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:

9 DATE OF INSTALLATION OR REPAIR

10 Is there an abandoned water well on the property?

BCASING FROM 0 TO 55 W/ 11.5 Inner Diameter


TYPE CASING STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT


5. BACK FILLED WITH: CUTTINGS


6. SEALED WITH: CEMENT


FROM: FT TO: FT

7. DISINFECTED WITH: BLEACH8. USE OF WELL:DOMESTIC

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS


A1. Contractor Name & Number: 1017 ROY HARMON WATER WELLS DRILLIN

2. Driller Name & Number: 2315 ROY HARMON



5. COUNTY : BENTON ( 007 )6 FRACTION ¼ of ¼

7 SECTION: 318 TOWNSHIP 19N

9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

Coarse Clay 0 45 No

Limestone 45 200 Yes 186

No

No



4. YIELD 480 gallons per min

5. DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE 6.25 IN

C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



FT TO: FT

B CASING FROM 0 TO 70 W/ 6 Inner Diameter


TYPE CASING STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT


5. BACK FILLED WITH: CEMENT


6. SEALED WITH:

FROM: FT TO: FT


DOMESTIC

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS







7 SECTION: 19N8 TOWNSHIP 31

9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

CL 0 60 No

LS 60 250 No





C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



B CASING FROM 0 TO 65 W/ -9999 Inner Diameter

CASING FROM 0 TO 210 W/ -9999 Inner Diameter

TYPE CASING STEEL W/ LINER

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT


5. BACK FILLED WITH: cuttings




7. DISINFECTED WITH: CHLOROX8. USE OF WELL:

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS


A1. Contractor Name & Number: 1196 DRILLERS INC.

2. Driller Name & Number: 2457 SAMUEL L. HARMON

3. Pump Installer Name & Number: 4689 SAMUEL HARMON




9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO



4. YIELD 15 gallons per Y5. DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE IN

C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:




CASING FROM 0 TO 20 W/ 6.31 Inner Diameter

TYPE CASING BLK STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT


5. BACK FILLED WITH: LIME SLURRY


6. SEALED WITH: CEMENT GROUT

FROM: 0 FT TO: 0 FT


7. DISINFECTED WITH: CLOROX8. USE OF WELL:

DOMESTIC

OTHER


CLOSED LOOP


If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS


A1. Contractor Name & Number: 1315 BOB WADE DRILLING CO.

2. Driller Name & Number: 2419 EDWARD MAGELKY

3. Pump Installer Name & Number: 0




9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF FORMATION DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

CL & GRV 0 10 No 0

WHITE,

GRAY LS10 242 No 0

BLK SHALE 242 272 No 0

SS 272 360 No 0

BRWN, GRAY

LS360 659 Yes 556



4. YIELD 22 gallons per MIN


C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:





TYPE CASING STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT




6. SEALED WITH:

FROM: FT TO: FT


DOMESTIC

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS








9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

CL 0 60 No

LS 60 250 No





C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



BCASING FROM 1 TO 41 W/ 6.25 Inner Diameter


TYPE CASING STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT


5. BACK FILLED WITH: LIMESLURRY




FROM: FT TO: FT

7. DISINFECTED WITH: BLEACH8. USE OF WELL:DOMESTIC

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS



2. Driller Name & Number: 2063 BOB WADE




7 SECTION:

8 TOWNSHIP

9 RANGE


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

Coarse Clay 0 39 No

Limestone 39 126 Yes 78

No

No




5. DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE IN

C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



FT TO: FT


CASING FROM 0 TO 190 W/ 6.31 Inner Diameter

TYPE CASING STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT


5. BACK FILLED WITH: LIMESLURRY



FROM: 0 FT TO: 0 FT


7. DISINFECTED WITH: BLEACH8. USE OF WELL:

DOMESTIC

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS




3. Pump Installer Name & Number: 0



7 SECTION:

8 TOWNSHIP

9 RANGE


DESCRIPTION


FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

COARSE CLAY 0 75 No 0

WHITE

LIMESTONE75 281 No 0

BLACK SHALE 281 331 No 0

BROWN

LIMESTONE331 700 Yes 659



4. YIELD 78 gallons per HR


C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



BCASING FROM TO W/ Inner Diameter


TYPE CASING

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT


5. BACK FILLED WITH:

FROM: FT TO: FT

6. SEALED WITH:

FROM: FT TO: FT

7. DISINFECTED WITH: CHLORINE PELLETS8. USE OF WELL:

DOMESTIC

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS





4. Date Well Completed: 08/05/2013 Replacement


7 SECTION:

8 TOWNSHIP

9 RANGE


DESCRIPTION


FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO

Gray

Limestone700 1032 Yes 1021

No

No





C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



FT TO: FT

B CASING FROM 0 TO 630 W/ -9999 Inner Diameter


TYPE CASING STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT







OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

DRIVE SHOE

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS




3. Pump Installer Name & Number: 4690 ROY HARMON




9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO



4. YIELD 6 gallons per Y5. DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE IN

C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



B CASING FROM TO W/ Inner Diameter


TYPE CASING

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT






7. DISINFECTED WITH:

8. USE OF WELL:

OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

PLUGGED TOP TO BOTTOM

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS






5. COUNTY : WASHINGTON ( 143 )6 FRACTION ¼ of ¼


9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO


3. STATIC WATER LEVEL Ft. below land surface

4. YIELD 0 gallons per N

5. DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE IN

C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



B CASING FROM -9999 TO 250 W/ -9999 Inner Diameter


TYPE CASING STEEL

3. SCREEN

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT

TYPE: DIA SLOT/GA

SET FROM FT TO FT




6. SEALED WITH: CMT



OTHER



If yes, name use:


11. REMARKS

12. SIGNED DATE

STATE OF ARKANSAS


A1. Contractor Name & Number: 1454 SUMMERS WELL DRILLING

2. Driller Name & Number: 2634 TIMOTHY SUMMERS



5. COUNTY : WASHINGTON ( 143 )6 FRACTION ¼ of ¼


9 RANGE 29W


DESCRIPTION

OF

FORMATION

DEPTHS IN

FEET WATER

BEARING

IF

YES..

DEPTHFROM TO



4. YIELD 4 gallons per N5. DIAMETER OF BORE HOLE IN

C PUMP REPORT

1 TYPE PUMP




5 TYPE LUBRICATION


7 WIRE SIZE

8 PRESSURE TANK:

SIZE: MAKE: MODEL:



FIGURE 1 – EXPLORATION SITE PLAN Karst Evaluation Cross ...€¦ · N=21 7-11-13 N=24 13-10-12...

Documents

Transcript of FIGURE 1 – EXPLORATION SITE PLAN Karst Evaluation Cross ...€¦ · N=21 7-11-13 N=24 13-10-12...