FIFTH REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RTI ... - CIC...

1

FIFTH REPORT

ON

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RTI ACT, 2005 (1.1.2010 TO 31.12.2010)

STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, HARYANA

SCO 70-71 & 114-115, Website: WWW.cicharyana.gov.in SECTOR 8 C, MADHYA MARG E-mail: [email protected] CHANDIGARH-160009

http://www.cicharyana.gov.in/

2

CONTENTS

Chapter No. Subject Page no. I. Chapter-I: Introduction 3-5

II. Chapter-II: Constitution of the State Information Commission

Haryana

6-11

III. Chapter-III : Salary and allowances 12-13

IV. Chapter-IV: Administration of the Right to Information Act

14-17

V. Chapter-V : Monitoring and Reporting 18-21

VI. Chapter-VI : Status of Complaints and appeals 22-26

VII. Chapter-VII: Creation of awareness about the Act. 27-28

VIII Chapter-VIII: Recommendations for the reformation 29-31

Annexure-A Haryana Right to Information Rules.2009 32-38

Annexure-B Information received from Public Authorities 39-51

Annexure-C Major Public Authorities from whom information has not been received

52-58

Annexure-D Details of penalty imposed upon the State Public Information Officers

59-72

Annexure-E Details of Compensation Awarded to the Appellants/Complainants

73-90

Annexure-F List of cases in which Disciplinary Proceedings were recommended

91-92

3

CHAPTER- 1

INTRODUCTION

The Citizen’s right to information is increasingly being recognized as

an important instrument to promote openness, transparency and

accountability in public administration. In fact, an opaque Government has

become obsolete in this age of liberalization and globalization. The citizens,

the stake holders, the consumer of public services, the beneficiaries of

development programmes, the civil Society organizations, the business and

commercial houses need to be informed by the public authorities’ about their

administration, operations and decisions.

Why Right to Information?

It has been observed that a Govt. which operates in secrecy is more

prone to corruption as compared to a Government which operates in greater

openness. This is why the Right to Information is considered as a significant

step in empowering the people to combat state corruption. India is a

democratic country and true democracy is enshrined in the preamble of our

constitution. Article 19(1) of our constitution spells the freedom of speech

and expression. Our Supreme Court has also held in a number of cases that

the Right to freedom of speech and expression includes the Right to receive

& impart information.

4

“The Real swaraj will come not by the acquisition of authority

by a few but by the acquisition of capacity by all to resist authority

when abused.”

-Mahatma Gandhi

The rights to information help to strengthen the foundation of

democracy. A democratic Govt. needs to be based on the trust of the

citizens and they must know its aims, policies and programmes and help the

Government to accomplish them.

The Parliament of India has enacted a specific law “Right to

Information Act.2005 in May 2005.” The said Act broadly provides for:-

1. Setting up of practical regime of Right to Information for citizens.

2. To promote openness, transparency & accountability in Public

administration to contain corruption.

3. Constitution of Central Information Commission and State

Information Commission.

4. Preservation of confidentiality of sensitive information.

The basic elements of RTI Act:- • Paradim shift from culture of secrecy to culture of openness.

• Maximum disclosure; minimum exception

5

• Mandatory disclosures (Suo-moto)

• Accountability

• Time limit for providing information.

• Protection of privacy of individuals.

• Appellate jurisdiction and power for imposing penalty.

• Reasonable cost/fee for obtaining information.

The current annual report contains analysis of the data received from

public authorities in accordance with the responsibility cast upon them u/s

25(2) and 25(3) of the Act and outlines the status of the implementation of

the Act in the year 2010. The report also presents a detailed account of

activities and events associated with State Information Commission as well

as its plan and budget during the year 2010.

6

CHAPTER-II

Constitution of the State Information Commission, Haryana

2.1 In order to ensure the effective implementation of Right to information

Act, 2005, the Haryana State on 31st October, 2005 by notification

in the official gazettes constituted a body known as the State

Information Commission, Haryana. Coincidentally the State Information

Commission, Haryana came into existence on 1st November, 2005, the

day the State of Haryana came into existence in the year 1966. In

exercising of the power vested under Sub Section 3 of Section 15, the

Haryana State appointed the State Chief Information Commissioner

and the State Information Commissioners. The details of assuming the

charge of the office by them are as under.

Name Inducted as Date of assuming the charge

Sh. G. Madhwan, IAS (Retd.)

State Chief Information Commissioner

1.11.2005

Mrs. Meenaxi Anand Chaudhry, IAS (Retd.)

State Information Commissioner 9.05.2006

Mrs. Asha Sharma, IAS (Retd.)


Lt. Gen. J.B.S.Yadava


Sh. Ashok Mehta


Sh. M.R. Ranga


7

2.2 During the period under report the following State Chief Information

Commissioner and State Information commissioner retired after

completing their tenure.

S.No. Name Designation Date of Retirement

1.

Shri G. Madhavan IAS (Retd.)

State Chief Information Commissioner

28.10.2010

2.

Lt. Gen (Retd.) J.B. S. Yadava

State Information Commissioner

27.2.2010

Headquarter of the Commission and its functioning

2.3 The State Government fixed the Commission’s Headquarter at

Chandigarh and allotted SCO No. 70-71 (First Floor), Sector-8-C,

Madhya Marg, Chandigarh to set up the office. Later on after the

induction of the State Information Commissioners the State

Government allotted an additional office in SCO No. 114-115 (Ground

and First Floor) in the same Sector.

Sh. Prem Veer Singh


Mrs. Meenaxi Anand Chaudhry, IAS (Retd.)

State Information Commissioner taken over as State Chief Information Commissioner.

29.10.2010

8

Allocation of budget to the State Information Commission, Haryana

2.4 The State Government was liberal while allocating the funds to the

State Information Commission, Haryana to meet its requirements. The

State Government since its inception to 2009-2010 has made the

following allocations under the head of account “2070-Other

Administrative Services-Non Plan:-

2.5 The breakup of the funds for the year 2009-2010 & 2010-2011 under

the various sub heads was as under:-

(Rs. in Lacs) Sr. No.

Object 2009-2010 (Final)

2010-2011 (Final)

1. Salary 134.72 108.02

2. Dearness Allowance 32.93 41.02

3. Travel Expenses 3.47 1.77

4. Office Expenses 37.83 28.92

Year Funds provided (Rs. in Lacs) Original Final

2005-2006, 30.00 26.79

2006-2007 140.04 126.00

2007-2008 167.94 135.05

2008-2009 244.27 212.02

2009-2010 265.62 233.04

2010-2011 269.34 223.74

9

5. Motor Vehicle 2.69 1.46

6. POL 8.19 5.11

7. Medical Charges 0.79 0.80

8. Contractual services 0.00 26.94

9. LTC 9.73 5.00

10. Information Technology 2.69 4.70

Total 233.04 223.74

2.6 The State Government sanctioned the following staff for the

Commission in the pre-revised and revised pay scales as follows:-

Sr. No.

Number and nomenclature of the post

Sanctioned pay scale Pre-revised Revised

1. One Chief Information Commissioner

Rs. 30000/- fixed Rs. 90000/- fixed

2. Five State Information Commissioners

Rs. 26000/- fixed Rs. 80000/- fixed

3. One Secretary (From the Joint Secretary level)

Rs.15100-400-18300

Rs.37400-67000+8000GP

4. One Senior Secretary to CIC

Rs.12000-375-16500+400SP

Rs.15600-39100+7600 GP

5. One Under Secretary 10000-325-13900+400 SP

Rs.15600-39100+6000 GP

6. Five Private Secretaries to SIC

8000-275-10200-EB-275-13500

Rs.9300-34800+5400 GP

7. Accounts Officer 6500-200-8500-EB-200-10500

Rs.9300-34800+5400 GP

8. Legal Consultant Consolidated as fixed by the Commission.

Consolidated as fixed by the Commission.

10

9. One Research Officer-cum-Consultant

7450-225-9025-EB-225-11500

Rs.9300-34800+4600 GP

10. One Superintendent 6500-200-8500-EB-200-10500-200 SP

Rs.9300-34800 +4200 GP+200 SP

11. Seven Personal Assistants

6500-200-8500-EB-200-10500

Rs.9300-34800+4200 GP

12. Two Assistants 5500-175-8300-EB-175-9000

Rs.9300-34800+3600 GP

13. One Accounts Assistant 5500-175-8300-EB-175-9000

Rs.9300-34800+3600 GP

14. Seven Readers 5500-175-8300-EB-175-9000

Rs.9300-34800+3600 GP

15. One Junior Scale Stenographer

4000-100-4800-EB-100-6000+40 SP

Rs.5200-20200+2400 GP

16. Six Steno Typists 3050-75-3950-EB-80-4590+100 SP

Rs.5200-20200+1900 GP + 100 SP

17. Ten Clerks-cum-Computer Operators

3050-75-3950-EB-80-4590+40 SP

Rs.5200-20200+ GP+40 SP

18. Nine Drivers 4000-100-4800-EB-100-6000+300 SP

Rs.5200-20200+2400 GP + 300 SP

19. Twenty one Peons 2550-55-2660-EB-60-3200+30 SP

Rs.4440-7440+1300 GP+30 SP

2.7 As on 31st December 2010, all the posts except Legal Consultant and

the Accounts Officer, remained filled up in the Commission. Sh.

Chander Shekhar, HCS remained Secretary of the Commission during

the period under report. As a matter of policy, the staff was taken on

transfer from the Haryana Civil Secretariat and other Departments of

the State Government. When officials of Haryana Civil Secretariat or

11

Government Departments were not made available, appointments were

made on contract basis or through identified outsourced agency.

12

CHAPTER - III

Salary and allowances

3.1 The salary and allowances payable and other terms and conditions of

service as provided under Sub Section 5 of Section 16 of the RTI Act

of:-

(i) The State Chief Information Commission shall be the same as that of an Election Commissioner;

(ii) The State Information Commissioner shall be the same as that of the Chief Secretary to the State Government;

Provided that if the State Chief Information Commissioner or a State

Information Commissioner, at the time of his appointment is, in receipt

of a pension, other than a disability or wound pension, in respect of

any previous service under the Government of India or under the

Government of a State, his salary in respect of the service as the State

Chief Information Commissioner or a State Information Commissioner

shall be reduced by the amount of that pension including any portion

of pension which was commuted and pension equivalent of other forms

of retirement benefits excluding pension equivalent to retirement

gratuity;

3.2 The salary and allowances payable to other officers and employees of

the State Information Commission, Haryana shall be at par with other

13

State Government employees. Personnel appointed on contract basis

or out sourced are entitled for payments at the contract rates which

shall not be less than the minimum wages.

14

CHAPTER-IV

Administration of the Right to Information Act

4.1 Effective Suo-moto disclosure of information:

Right to Information Act under Section 4 mandates every public

authority for pro-active disclosure of information. The information

which is required to be disclosed under this section includes

particulars of the organization including functions and duties, rules,

regulations, instructions, manuals, and records followed for the

discharge of functions, directory of officers and officials alongwith

monthly remuneration being paid to them, details of annual budget

including expenditure incurred, details of schemes/programmes

being handled, its beneficiaries and concession or subsidy being

provided etc. The particulars of State Assistant Public Officers/State

Public Information Officers/First Appellate Authority are also

required to be disclosed. It is a statutory requirement which every

public authority is bound to meet. Further, it is not sufficient to

publish the above information once but every public authority is

obliged to update such information periodically. As far as possible

the information should be updated immediately as and when any

development takes place. The information may be posted on the

website facilitating the citizens to access to the information without

15

approaching the public authority. This exercise as per requirement

of RTI Act, 2005 was to be completed within one hundred and

twenty days from its commencement but a number of public

authorities are yet to take effective steps as contemplated under

Section 4 of the Act.

4.2 Maintenance and retrieval of records.

Section 4 (1) (a) of the Right to Information Act 2005 lays

importance on maintenance of records by the public authorities duly

catalogued and indexed in a manner and form which facilitates

access within a reasonable time. In many cases the disposal of

requests asking for copies of documents, it was experienced that

the State Public Information Officers failed to retrieve the

documents requested because of absence of a proper record

keeping system. Record keeping is an area neglected in most of the

offices of Government and Public Sector Undertakings. Government

may launch a special drive in this direction so that the record

available in the offices of the public authorities are properly

catalogued, indexed and stored in a manner that facilitate easy

retrieval of information. The Act also emphasizes upon

computerization of the records and access through net-work.

16

4.3 Provisions of adequate staff and budget for furnishing the information.

The Right to Information Act, 2005 can successfully create a

practical regime for information sharing with the citizen if there is

an effective delivery mechanism in public authorities especially at

the district and block levels. Some of the public authorities at the

district or at the block level do not have any basic infrastructure like

photocopiers, computers etc. to provide information to the public.

Since funds under contingency are also limited, the option to get

photocopies from the market is also not possible. In the absence of

infrastructure, hand written illegible information is sometimes

furnished to the information seekers. These difficulties had been

constantly voiced in the interaction which the Commission had with

the members of the public, State Public Information Officers and

other stake holders apart from being raised in the public hearings

before the Commission. Therefore, the State Government may

earmark a certain percentage of budgets for implementation of the

RTI related issues. Adequate provisions be made for purchase of

stationery, office equipments like photocopiers, computer etc. in the

office of designated officers.

4.4 Cost and Fee rules under the RTI Act.

Section 27 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 read with Sections

6 (1), 7 (1) and 7 (5) of the Act provide for prescribing fee for

17

submission of application and the cost for providing the information.

Accordingly, the Haryana Government had notified the Haryana

Right to Information Rules, 2005 on 28th October 2005 wherein the

application fee was prescribed @ Rs. 50/- and additional fee @ Rs.

10/- per page. The State Government after reconsidering the

matter and by repealing the Haryana Right to Information Rules,

2005 notified Haryana Right to Information Rules, 2009 on 21st

December 2009 wherein the additional fee to be charged under sub

Section 5 of Section 7 of the Act was reduced from Rs. 10/- to Rs.

2/- per page. Copy of the rules notified on 21st December 2009 is

appended at Annexure ‘A’.

4.5. Appeal Procedure

In exercise of powers conferred under Section 27 read with sub-

Section 10 of the Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005,

the State Government laid down the procedure for filing appeals,

procedure for deciding appeal, mode of serving notices, appearance

of appellant/complainant before the Commission etc. by notifying

Haryana Right to Information Rules, 2009 on 21st December 2009

by repealing the earlier rules notified on 28th October 2005.

18

CHAPTER-V

Monitoring and Reporting 5.1 Section 25 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 provides that State

Information Commission at the end of each year shall prepare a report

on the implementation of the provisions of this Act for the year and

forward a copy to the appropriate Government. The report is required

to be laid before the State Legislature thereafter. Section 25 (2) of the

Act further mandates that each Ministry or Department or Public

Under takings shall in relation to the public authorities within their

jurisdiction collect and provide such information to the State

Information Commission as is required to prepare the Annual Report

by the Commission. When no report was received from the public

authorities, the Commission vide letter dated 22.8.2012 directed the

Administrative Secretaries, Heads of Departments, Divisional

Commissioners, Deputy Commissioners of the Districts in the State,

Managing Directions of Boards, Corporations and public sectors

undertakings, Registrar, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Secretary

Haryana Vidhan Sabha to collect the required details from the

designated State Public Information Officers and furnish it to the

Commission for the preparation of the Annual report from 1.1.2010 to

31.12.2010. Statistical analysis of the administration of the Act, on the

19

basis of the data received by the Commission from the various public

authorities, arranged alphabetical orders in respect of Administrative

Secretaries, Heads of Departments, Boards Corporations, Public

Undertakings, Commissioners of Divisions and Deputy Commissioners

separately is annexed as Annexure ‘B’. A list of major Departments

and public authorities who did not respond to the Communications

from the Commission dated 22.8.2012 is placed at Annexure ‘C'.

5.2 As per available information during the period from 1.1.2010 to

31.12.2010, a total of 32856 applications were received by the

reporting public authorities. The access to information was withheld on

account of exemption provisions in 1081 and 65 cases under Section 8

and 9 respectively of the RTI Act, 2005. Thus access to information

was denied in about 3.487 percentages of total cases. A total sum of

Rs. 1627162 was deposited as prescribed application fee and

additional fee by the applicants during the period under report.

These figure shows that the public authorities have by

and large provided the information in majority of cases to the

RTI applicants.

5.3 Suggestions received from the Public Authorities towards

improved implementation of the Act.

For bringing improvement in the implementation of the RTI Act, 2005,

certain suggestions have been received from various public authorities

20

while submitting reports sought under Section 25(2) of the Act. These

are as under:-

(i) The designated State Public Information Officer should be a

senior level officer who could take action against the erring

officer/official for committing delay in supplying the information.

(ii) Additional fee should be enhanced to discourage the information

seeker for frivolous information.

(iii) Numerous, frivolous and voluminous complaints are received

from RTI applicants which not only diverts the attention of the

staff but also resources in collecting such information which do

not serve any public interest.

(iv) To reduce frivolous applications and to ensure that only genuine

information seekers invoke the provision of the RTI Act it is

suggested that only one information be allowed in one RTI

application.

(v) The BPL applicants are seeking information which does not relate

to them. Generally the BPL applicants are seeking the entire

information on the functioning of the public authority which is

apparently a misuse of the Act. In such cases there should be

some mechanism in the Act so that the BPL persons are actually

benefited for their cause. The time limit of 30 days should be

21

increased in respect of the information pertaining to more than 5

years old.

(vi) The State Public Information Officers/First Public Authorities

should be trained periodically.

(vii) The penalty should be imposed upon the public authority with

the stipulation to recover it from the erring official responsible

for the delay in supplying the information.

(viii) Third party information should not be disclosed.

22

CHAPTER-VI

Status of Complaints and Appeals

6.1 The State Information Commission has the original jurisdiction to

receive and enquire into the complaints under Section 18 (2) and

second appellate jurisdiction under Section 19 (3) to receive

appeals against the decisions of the public authorities. During

the period from 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 the institution of

complaints and appeals, decision taken and the matters which

remained pending as on 31.12.2010, is given below:-

(i) Details of complaint cases:

(II) Details of appeal cases:

Pending cases as on 31.12.2009

Complaints instituted during the period under report

Decided during the period

Pending as on 31.12.2010

1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010

Total

77 450 527 445 82

Pending cases as on 31.12.2009

Appeals instituted during the period under report

Decided during the period

Pending as on 31.12.2010

1.1.2010 to Total 31.12.2010

378 2560 2938 2116 822

23

6.2 During this period from 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 the Commission

decided 5217 miscellaneous applications by advising the applicants

suitably to take further necessary action to complete the formalities as

mandated under the RTI Act, 2005 and rules before entertaining the

request as complaint or appeal.

6.3 The State Information Commission, Haryana has been deciding all the

complaints and appeals after summoning both the parties and by

following the practice of affording an opportunity of personal hearing

to both complainants/appellants and the State Public Information

Officers/First Appellate Authorities and third parties as well. Decisions

are announced after examining the written and oral submissions made

by the parties. The original and the relevant record is also perused, if

deemed necessary by the Commission during the hearing.

6.4 Action taken Under Section 20 of the Act.

The Commission during 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 issued 799 show

cause notices for imposing penalty to the State Public Information

Officers and the Deemed State Public Information Officers under

Section 20 (1) of the RTI Act, 2005. Penalty was imposed on 114 State

Public Information Officers/Deemed State Public Information Officers

respectively who had failed to furnish complete information within the

24

specified time limit and the delay was not found to be due to

reasonable cause. Details of these cases for the period of report from

01.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 are placed at Annexure ‘D’ alongwith the

details of amount imposed on account of penalty. Disciplinary action

had also been recommended under Section 20 (2) of the Act against

the delinquent officers/officials including the deemed State Public

Information Officer who had failed to provide timely and complete

information to the State Public Information Officer. During 1.1.2010 to

31.12.2010 in 13 cases it was recommended to initiate disciplinary

action against the erring officials/officers, details of such cases are

placed at Annexure ‘E’.

6.5 Compensation under Section 19 (8) (b):

Section 19 (8) (b) of the Act empowered the Commission to require

the public authorities to compensate the complainants or the

appellants for any loss or detriment suffered by them. Details of these

cases in which compensation had been awarded during the report

period of 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 are at Annexure ‘F'. During this

period in 320 number of cases, compensation has been awarded to the

appellate/complainants. It is pertinent to mention here that some of

the public authorities decided to recover the same from the State

Public Information Officer concerned or the person found responsible

for the delay.

25

6.6 Court Cases

In some cases the aggrieved parties have preferred writs against the

orders of the Commission in Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court at

Chandigarh. The Commission in its statutory capacity under the

provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 has decided not to

defend such writs. In such situations a letter to the Registrar (Writ)

and Registrar (Judicial) including the Advocate General, Haryana as

well is being sent.

6.7 Website and email address of the Commission:

The website of the Commission www.cicharyana.gov.in is operational.

The cause list and orders passed by the Commission on Complaints

and appeals cases are being posted on the website. The email address

of the Commission is [email protected].

6.8 Central Assistance for IT enablement

The Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and

Pensions, Department of personnel & Training, New Delhi vide letter

dated 20th November 2008 launched a new initiative on

“Strengthening, Capacity Building and Awareness Generation for

Effective Implementation of the Right to Information Act under the

Centrally Sponsored Plan Scheme under which it was agreed to

sanction Rs. 30.00 lacs for IT enablement. Accordingly, the State

Information Commission, Haryana on 5th December 2008 submitted a

http://www.cicharyana.gov.in/

mailto:[email protected]

26

project proposal for providing computers and peripherals, up-gradation

of existing website for file tracking system, application status through

SMS, digitization of record, providing video conferencing facility. The

Government of India released Rs. 21.00 lacs, equal to 70% of the total

sanctioned amount. The activities could not be completed for want of

release of remaining 30% amount. The Commission has requested the

Government of India in the Department of Personnel & Training, New

Delhi to release the remaining funds without any further delay so that

work to hear the cases through Video Conferencing System which has

already been undertaken including the updating the existing website

could be complete.

6.9 Propagation under RTI

The Government of India for the financial year 2010-2011 sanctioned

Rs. 1.50 lacs vide letter No. 1/6/2010-IR dated 29.09.2010 under this

Scheme for organizing Workshops, forums, conferences etc. The State

Information Commission till the end of reporting period could not

spend the amount. The State Information Commission, Haryana has

decided to organize these Seminars-cum-Workshops with the

assistance of Haryana Institute of Public Administration, Panchkula in

the month of January and February, 2011.

27

CHAPTER-VII

Creation of awareness about the Act.

7.1 Section 26 of the Right to Information Act directs the State

Government to create awareness among the public by developing and

organizing educational programmes to advance the understating of the

public, in particular of disadvantaged communities as to how to

exercise the rights contemplated under this Act. The Sub Section 1 (d)

of Section 26 of the Act casts obligation on the Government to train

State Public Information Officer of public authorities and produce

relevant training material for use by the public authorities themselves.

The Commission in its earlier reports has suggested launching of a

programme for training and awareness of the public for ensuring

effective implementation of the Act. The response of the Government

is as under:-

(i) Training Programme for SAPIOs/SPIOs/FAAs.

The State Government has designated the Haryana institute of

public administration (HIPA), Gurgaon as nodal agency in this

regard. Training for the designated officers which includes

SAPIOs/SPIOs and FAAs is being imparted in regular intervals by

HIPA as well as other training institutes like HVPNL Technical

Training institutes for power utility department and Haryana

28

Institute of Rural Development, Nilokheri. Training to other

employees working in various public authorities on RTI Act is

also being imparted to sensitize them and to make them aware

for dealing with the matters related to RTI.

(ii) Publication of directory and a user guide.

The Commission in its first and second report recommended that

a guide in the official language should be compiled to assist the

citizens in exercise of their right to access information under the

Act. It was also recommended to prepare a directory of the

designated SAPIOs/SPIOs and the FAAs. Now in the year of 2008

on the recommendations of the State Government the HIPA,

Gurgaon has published a directory of the designated officer’s

alongwith a user guide on RTI and a ready reckoner on the Act in

English and Hindi for the use of citizens of the State.

29

CHAPTER-VIII

Recommendations

The Right to Information Act casts responsibility upon the State

Information Commission as well as public authorities to suggest

measures for effective implementation of the Act. Recommendations to

the State Government and the public authorities are as under:-

(i) Disposal of first appeals:-

Sub Section 1 of Section 19 of the Act provides for taking up a

matter of first appeal before the Appellate Authority in the pubic

authority, when the applicant is not satisfied with the

information furnished by the State Public Information of the

public authority. The First Appellate Authority is mandated to

dispose of the appeal within 30 days or within extended period

not exceeding a total of 45 days from the date of filing of the

appeal. In many cases, the Commission has observed that the

First Appellate Authority either deals with the appeal late or do

not dispose it of at all. This inevitably results in delayed receipt

of information and compels the applicant to take up the matter

with the Commission in second appeal. This causes delay,

additional expenditure and avoidable harassment to information

seekers. The Commission, therefore, recommends providing

30

training to designated authorities and officials to improve their

understanding of the Act for better discharge of their duties

under the Act.

(ii) State Public Information Officers also need to be sensitized

towards the needs of citizens. A massive round of training of

SPIOs must therefore, be undertaken to enable them to

discharge the responsibilities cast on them under the Act.

(iii) Even though pro-active disclosure is mandatory under section

4(1), it was noticed that pro-active disclosure was not done in a

satisfactory manner by many public authorities. The public

authorities should realize the importance of pro-active

disclosure, Suo-moto disclosure of information would reduce the

number of requests for information. Hence it is recommended

that Government may suitably instruct the public authorities to

disclose as much information as possible under section 4(1) of

the Right to information Act, such as functions, duties,

procedures, accountability and norms set by the public

authorities for discharge of their functions, new schemes,

guidelines.

(iv) Citizen’s charter should form an integral part of the disclosure

under Section 4 (1) (b) so that the public is aware of the

mandate of a public authority towards the citizens. All public

31

authorities must periodically, revisit their procedures. Irksome

procedures should be debated in public and made more citizens

friendly. Citizens should be able to enforce the norms disclosed

under the RTI Act whenever necessary.

(v) The Commission should be empowered to penalize pubic

authorities for inadequate disclosure or non-disclosure of

information required under Section 4 (1) (b) of the Act.

(vi) It should be obligatory for public authorities to publish these

disclosures in their Annual Reports.

(vii) It is suggested that specific column be included in the annual

confidential reports of officers commenting on attitude towards

implementation of the Act. The self assessment report of the

SPIO and the First Appellate Authority must include information

regarding number of applications/appeals on the receipt and

disposal.

32

Annexure ‘A’ HARYANA GOVERNMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT Notification

The 21st December, 2009

No.S.O.99/C.A.22/2005/S.27/2009.—In exercise of the powers

conferred sub-section (1) read with sub-section (2) of section 27 of the

Right to Information Act, 2005 (Act 22 of 2005), the Governor of Haryana

hereby makes the following rules providing for information under the said

Act, namely :— Short title and 1. (1) These rules may be called the Haryana Right to commencement. Information Rules , 2009. (2) They shall come into force from 1st January, 2010. 2. (1) In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,

a) “Act” means the Right to Information Act, 2005 (Act 22 of 2005);

b) “Commission” means the Haryana Information Commission , constituted under section 15 of the Act;

c) “Model Form” means a model form appended to

these rules;

d) “section” means the section of the Act.

(2) The words and expressions used in these rules, but nor defined, shall have the same meanings as respectively assigned to them in the Act.

Application for 3. (1) a person who desires to obtain any information Obtaining admissible under the Act, shall make an application, preferably in Information Model Form ‘A’ to the State Public Information Officer and in his Sections 2(m), 6 absence to State Assistant Public Information Officer along-with fee and 27 as specified in sub-rule (1) of rule 5 of these rules.

(2) On the receipt of an application, made under sub-rule (1), the State Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer as the case may be, shall give a receipt in token, thereof to the applicant.

33

Deposit of fee 4. (1) The fee shall be deposited with the State Public Section 6 Information Officer either in Cash against proper receipt, by Bank

Draft, by Indian Postal Order or by treasury Challan in the following Heads of Account :—

Major Head 0070—Other Administrative Services

Sub Major Head 60—Other Services

Minor Head 800-Other Receipts

Sub Head 86—Fee under the Right to Information Act,

2005.

Detailed head “0070-Other Administrative Services-60-Other Services-800-Other Receipts-86 Fee under the Right to Information Act, 2005”.

(2) The amount of fee shall be credited to the account as

referred in sub-rule (1):

Provided that the Boards, Corporations and other autonomous bodies of the State may get the amount of requisite fee deposited in their own accounts maintained by the.

(3) On receipt of an application, submitted under sub-rule

(1) of rule 3, the State Public Information Officer shall scrutinize the application and shall assess how much fee is required to be paid by the applicant for obtaining the information.

(4) The fee assessed under sub-rule (3), shall be intimated

to the applicant by the State Public Information Officer, expeditiously, in Model Form ‘B’ to ensure the delivery of information within time specified under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Act.

(5) In case the applicant fails to deposit the requisite fee

within a fifteen days after the issuance of the intimation given to him under sub- rule (4), it shall be construed that the applicant is no longer interested in obtaining the information sought for and his application shall be deemed to have been filed.

Quantum of fee. 5. (1) An application for obtaining any information under sub Section 6 and 7 section (1) of the section 6 shall be accompanied with a fee of Rs. 50/-. (2) For providing information under sub-section (1) of

section 7, the fee shall be charged from the applicant at the following rates, namely: —

(a) Rs. 2/- for each page in A-4 or A-3 size paper, created or copied; and

(b) if information is to be provided on a large size of paper

than that specified in clause (a), the actual cost shall be charged.

34

(3) For providing information under sub-section (5) of section 7, the fee shall be charged from the applicant at the following rates, namely:-

(a) Rs. 50/- for providing information in a floppy;

(b) Rs. 100/- for providing information in diskette; and

(c) if information sought is of such a nature, which is

contained in a printed document, of which a price has been fixed, then that information shall be provided after charging the price, fixed for that printed document. However, if only an extract or page of such a printed document is asked for, then a fee of Rs. 2/- per page shall be charged.

(4) No fee for inspection of record shall be charged, if such

an inspection is made for one hour only. However, if inspection is made for a period of more than one hour, then a fee of rupees ten shall be charged for every fifteen minutes in excess of first hour. Every fraction of the period above fifteen minutes shall be construed as complete period of fifteen minutes and it shall be charged as full period of fifteen minutes.

Procedure for 6. (1) The memorandum of appeal shall contain the following filing appeals. information, namely :— Sections 19(1) and (3) (a) name and address of the appellant, including the details

of contact telephone/mobile Numbers/e-mail address, if any;

b) official designation and address of State Public

Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case may be ;

(c) official designation and address of the Officer against the decision of whom the appeal is preferred;

(d) particulars of the order including number, if any , against which the appeal is preferred;

(e) brief facts leading to the appeal;

(f) prayer or relief sought;

(g) grounds for the prayer or relief;

(h) verification by the appellant; and

(i) any other information which the Commission may deem

necessary for deciding the appeal.

35

(2) the appellant shall submit three copies of the memorandum of appeal for official purpose.

(3) Every appeal made to the Commission shall be

accompanied by the following documents, namely :— (a) self attested copies of the Orders or documents against

which the appeal is being preferred;

(b) copies of documents relied upon by the appellant and referred to in the appeal; and

(c) an index of the documents referred to in the appeal.

Provided that in case complete documents are not furnished,

the appeal shall not be rejected but the appellant shall be asked to complete the above formalities.

Procedure for 7. Before deciding an appeal, the Commission shall , — Deciding appeal Section 19(10) (a) serve notice to the concerned persons;

(b) entertain any evidence in support of appeal, which may be oral or in writing from the concerned persons;

(c) examine on oath or an affidavit from the persons

concerned; (d) examine the documents or any records or copies

thereof; (e) inquire through the authorized office the facts of the

appeal or may require facts in detail, if he so deems appropriate, hear the State Public Information Officer or any other senior officer who had decided the first appeal, as the case may be; and

(f) receive evidence on affidavits from the State Public

Information Officer or any senior officer who had decided the appeal or from any other person from whom the evidence may be deemed necessary.

Mode of 8. The Commission may serve notice to the persons concerned serving notice in any of the following modes, namely :— section 19(10)

(a) By hand delivery (dasti) through process server;

(b) By Registered Post, Speed Post, Under Postal Certificate, Courier or such other means ;

(c) By electronic mail, if e-mail address is provided ; or

36

(d) By publication in the newspaper.

Appearance or 9. The appellant or the complainant, as the case may be, shall in Appellant / every case be informed of the date of hearing at least 15 clear days before Complainant that date. If the complainant/ appellant fails to appear on the date of hearing,

the Commission will decide the matter on merits:

Provided that where the Commission is satisfied that the circumstances exist due to which the complainant or appellant is being prevented from attending the hearing, then, he may afford the complainant or appellant another opportunity of being heard before taking a final decision.

Order by 10. (1) the Commission shall make order in writing and Commission pronounce the same in the presence of the concerned parties. section 19(10)

(2) The party concerned may obtain the copy of the order from the Commission.

Repeal and 11. The Haryana Right to Information Rules, 2005 are hereby Saving repealed:

Provided that any order made or action taken under the rules

so repealed shall be deemed to have been made or taken under the corresponding provisions of these rules.

37

MODEL FORM ‘A’ [See rule 3(1)]

To State Public Information Officer/ State Assistant Public Information Officer, __________(Name of the office with address)

(1) Full Name of the applicant:

(2) Address:

(3) Particulars of Information required—

(i) Subject matter of information*

(ii) The period to which the information relates**

(iii) Description of the information required***

(iv) Whether information is required by post or in person (actual postal charges shall be include in additional fee)

(v) In case by post (Ordinary, Registered or Speed post)

Place: Date: Signature of the applicant. * Broad category of the subject to be included

(such as grant / Government land/ Service matters/ Licenses etc.)

** Relevant period for which information is required to be indicated. *** Specific details of the information are required to be indicated.

___________________________________________________________

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Received your application dated …………………………. Vide dairy No…………………… dated………………..

Signature of State Public Information Officer/ Sate Assistant Public Information Officer

(Name of the Department/Office)………………………………………..

38

MODEL FORM ‘B’ [See rule 4(4)]

From Designation of the State Public Information Officer.

To Name of the applicant

Address of the applicant.

Sir,

Please refer to your application dated ………………. addressed to

the undersigned requesting for information under Right to Information Act,

2005.

1. The additional fee for supplying this information is `…………………………

2. You are requested to pay the fee through any of the mode of payment i.e. either in cash against proper receipt, by Bank Draft, by Indian Postal Order or by Treasury Challan as mentioned in rule 4(1) of the Haryana Right to Information Rules, 2009 and send a copy of proof thereof to this office so that the requisite information can be supplied to you.

3. In case you are dissatisfied with the above estimate, you are requested to submit an appeal before the Appellate Authority………………………

(Name of the department).

State Public Information Officer ____________________________________________________________

URVASHI GULATI, Chief Secretary to Government, Haryana

39

Sr. No.

Name of thePublic Authority

Number ofrequests received

No. ofrequests rejected (reasons inbrief) as perprovisions ofthe Act.

Particulars of anydisciplinary action takenagainst anyofficial onaccount ofviolation of RTIAct.

Factual report of the efforts madeby the Public Authorities toadminister and implement the spiritand intention of this Act.

Recommendations, if any,received for the development/improvement/ modernization/reform or amendment to thisAct or other legislation orcommon law or any othermatter relevant to RTI Act andaction taken thereon.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)u/s 8 u/s 9 On the

recommen-dations of the Commiss-ion

Otherwise Applica- tion

Charges u/s 6(1)

Documenta-tion charges u/s 7(3)

1 Agriculture (Director)

225 1 0 0 0 10405 5411 All steps have been taken to implement the Act.

0

2 C.I.D. (ADGP.CID(H)

93 22 0 0 0 1762 296 0 0

3 Development & Panchayats (Di t )

229 0 0 0 0 6750 1149 0 0

4 Elementary Education (Director)

1161 0 0 0 10 20150 50 To give information and motivation to the applicants

under RTU Act,2005.

0

5 Electronics & Information Technology (Director)

30 0 0 0 0 700 30 Efforts are being made for implementation of the Act.

0

Heads of Department

The amount of charges collected

w.e.f. 1-1-2010 to 31-12-2010

REGISTER OF REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION & DISPOSAL OF REQUESTS UNDER RTI ACT, 2005 ANNEXURE-B

40

6 Health Services (Director)

196 0 0 0 0 500 28 0 0

7 Haryana Aids Control Society (Chairperson

61 0 0 0 0 890 200 51 0

8 Home Guards & Civil Defence (Comdt. Genl.)

31 0 0 0 0 800 964 PIO's & APIO's have been appointed in every distt. They

have directed to strictly comply the provison of the act.

0

9 Horticulture (Director)

144 3 7 1 2 5550 5701 0 11251

10 Hospitality (Director)

10 0 0 0 0 150 50 Reports provided to the applicants on real facts under adminsiter and implement the spirit and intention of this Act.

0

11 Industries & Commerce (Director)

536 0 0 0 100 27246 16004 0 0

12 Law & Legislative (L.R & Secy.)

33 0 0 0 0 600 358 0 0

13 Mines & Geology (Director)

102 0 0 0 0 3920 1982 0 0

14 Police (D.G) 13607 206 4 0 0 547410 199989 0 0

15 Printing & Stationery (Controller)

38 0 0 1 0 1950 458 0 0

41

16 PWD (B&R) (E.I.C.)

1267 1 0 9 0 32080 24557 Full efforts are made to implement the spirit and

intention of this act.

0

17 Rural Development (Director)

115 0 0 0 0 2900 1443 0 0

18 Science & Technology (Director)

31 0 0 0 0 600 430 0 0

19 Sports & Youth Affairs (Director)

92 0 0 Shri Ram Chander,

DSYAO,Karnal and Shri

Bhagwan Dass, Storekeepar,Ka

rnal are warned as

provided under rule 8 of the chargesheet

for not providing

correct information to the applicant.

3375 0 0 0 0

20 Supplies & Disposals (Director)

14 2 0 0 0 550 1074 0 0

42

21 Technical Education (Director)

886 0 0 0 0 22925 15106 1. Steps have been taken inaccordance with therequirements of clause B ofsection 4(1) to provide us asmuch information to the publicby placing information on thewebsite of the department. ii)State PIOs have designated atheard quarter level and in all thefield offices of the department toprovide information under RTIAct. iii) The names ofSPIOs/APIOs and FAAsdesignated under the RTI ACThave been prominently displayedon the notice board. iv) Formatof RTI Application & Quantum offee as per Haryana Right toInformation Rules 2005/2009have also been displayedprominently on the notice boardfor the convenience ofinformation seeker. v) TheRTI information under the ACTare being provided within thestipulated period of time i.e.within 30 days.

0

22 Transport Commissioner (Transport Commissioner)

557 4 0 0 0 10390 3623 Effords information made toimpliment the RTI Act,as perinstruction received from HeadQuarter and public from time totime.

0

23 Vigilance (Inquiry Officer)

8 0 0 0 0 50 70 Public Authority make best efforts to administer and

implement this Act.

0

43

24 State Vigilance Bureau (Director)

26 0 0 0 0 180 0 Instruction record form higher authorities from time to time

are being followed

The RTI information is being sought in most of the cases to blackmail and harass the

officers/officials. It is requested the genuiness of the information seekar be varified and the fredulent,

information be discouraged.2.Seprate staff may kindly be deputed to

deal with the application of the RTI.

25 Vigilance Department, Haryana

42 0 0 0 0 1715 1581 0 0

26 Home Department

65 0 0 0 10 2030 615 0 0

Total 19599 239 11 11 3497 702203 281169 0 0

1 Agro-Industries Corpn. Ltd. (Chairman)

39 0 0 0 0 1900 527 0 0

2 Coop. Housing Fed Ltd.

35 0 0 0 0 1360 524 The Act is implemented in true spirit and with the intention to

provide the required

No recommendations is received from anyone.

3 Coop. Supply & Marketing Fed Ltd.

184 0 0 0 0 10880 16802 Information given to theapplicants as per RTI Act.

0

4 Power Generation Corpn. (HPGC) (Chairman)

316 0 0 0 0 10180 27573 Efforts have been made by SPIO and FAA to supply information

under RTI Act,2005 to the applicants in time & decisions

from State Information Commissioner Information

h d h f

0

Board & Corporation

44

5 Electronics Dev. Corpn.

93 0 0 0 0 3600 1664 Efforts are being made for implementation of the Act.

0

6 Financial Corpn. (HFC) (Chairman)

96 7 0 0 0 4450 6728 1. Action w.r.t publishingdocuments mentioned undersection 4(1)(b)(i) to (XVII) of RTIAct 2005, already compliedwith. The information isavailable on corporationwebsite http//www.hfcindia.org. 2.Corporation has alreadydesignated/appointed SPIO andASPIO at headoffice,Chandigarh. Further thecorporation has also designatedits branch manager(s) as ASPIOat branch/district level. Thecorporation has Five branchoffices in Haryana & Delhi. 3.The ED of the corporation athead office is FAA. As regardsgiving publicity to this act.Thecorporation issued a circular on30-11-2005/01.12.2005. All the

0

7 Kurukshetra Dev. Board (Chairman)

30 0 0 0 0 1100 1794 0 0

8 Rajya Sainik Board

41 0 0 0 0 1070 110 0 f

9 Renewable Energy Development Agency

18 0 0 0 0 410 0 0 0

10 Seed Certification Agency (Chairman)

10 0 0 0 0 450 320 0 0

45

11 Seeds Dev. Corpn. Ltd. (Chairman)

54 0 0 0 0 2700 4858 0 0

12 Tourism Dev. Corpn. Ltd. (Chairperson

119 0 0 0 0 4660 2761 0 0

13 Urban Development Authority (HUDA) (C.A)

1935 0 0 0 0 82240 9820 Guidelines and instructions have been issued to the SPIOs

and FAAs for ensuring implementations of the RTI Act,

2005 in letter and spirit.

0

14 Warehousing Corpn. (Chairman)

71 0 0 0 0 3100 5029 Information was supplied to the applicant promptly and withing

the stipulated time as far as possible to follow the RTI Act in

true spirit.

0

15 Lokayukta Haryana

29 0 0 0 0 800 2010 Detail is in accompanying annexture "A".

Detail is in accompanying annexture "A"

16 Shri Mata Sheetla Devi Shrine Board Gurgaon

5 0 0 0 0 0 220 During MELA and otherwisegeneral public is educatedabout the benefits of RTI Act,2005

0

17 CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar

297 1 1 0 0 0 10567 Special trainings and awarenessprogrammes for SPIOs/ASPIOsand other officials conductedregularly by the academy of theDirectorate of HRM.

0

18 Staff Selection Commission, Haryana.

3320 800 50 0 0 107592 0 Full efforts have been made bySPIO to implement the Act. TheCommission has also launchedits Website i.e. www. Hss.gov.in

0

46

19 Medical Education & Research Haryana

8 0 0 0 0 160 0 Efforts were made to disposeoff all the apllications withintime limit. Some of theapplications were disposed offwithin a week period also.

0

20 State Information Commission,Haryana

143 0 0 13 0 6100 1155 0 0

21 National Health Rural

42 0 0 0 0 1340 0 0 0

Total 6885 808 51 13 0 244092 92462 0 0

1 Commissioner, Gurgaon Division, Gurgaon

921 0 0 0 0 46850 4039 All Kinds of efforts made it as Director in this Act.

0

2 Commissioner, Hisar Division, Hisar.

67(Out of which 51 application received

form applicants

and 16 applicatio

ns received

from Govt.)4

applications have

been

one application has been rejected

due to non-receipt of document

charges

0 0 0 2580 4710 Application are being disposed off immediately under this Act.

0

Divisional Commissioners

47

3 Commissioner, Rohtak Division,

72 0 0 0 0 1702 171 0 0

Total 1060 1 0 0 0 51132 8920 0 0

1 Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad

291 0 0 0 0 13200 4510 f 0

2 Deputy Commissioner, Hisar

67 1 0 0 0 2580 4710 Applications are being disposed off immediately under this Act.

0

3 Deputy Commissioner, Mewat (Nuh)

274 1 0 0 0 3840 1770 0 0

4 Deputy Commissioner, Rewari

688 0 0 0 0 13985 964 0 0

5 Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa

49 0 0 0 590 0 0 Reports being within time. yes

Total 1369 2 0 0 590 33605 11954 0 0

Deputy Commissioners

48

1 District &Sessions Judge, Ambala

29 15 1 Information given to the

applicant Shri Rakesh

Bhardwaj in ID No.9 at

0 1120 880 (i)The information was madeavailable at the earliest possible& within prescribed time. (ii)Information provided all thetime

0

2 District &Sessions Judge,

6 0 0 0 0 1730 0 0 0

3 District &Sessions Judge,

30 0 0 0 0 1860 0 All applications were disposed off in time.

No recommendations recived

4 District &Sessions Judge, F t h b d

4 (Requisite fee no

attached)

0 0 0 220 0 0 0

5 District &Sessions Judge, G

26 3 0 0 0 1020 0 0 0

6 District &Sessions Judge, Hisar

22 1(Because incomplete information

)

0 0 0 1210 80 0 0

7 District &Sessions Judge, Jind

2 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 Every possible efforts are being made to implement

the RTI Act.8 District &

Sessions Judge, Jhajjar

90 2(i) Instrument of payment of fee was defective. (ii) Does'nt fall within

the jurisdiction

0 0 0 810 270 0 0

9 District &Sessions Judge, Kaithal

6 4 0 0 0 300 0 Every endeavorment is madeto implement the provision ofthe act in its letter & spirit

No recommendations have been received as yet.

District & Sessions Judge

49

10 District &Sessions Judge, Karnal

37 0 0 0 0 1990 0 0 0

11 District &Sessions Judge, K k h t

12 0 0 0 0 930 0 0 0

12 District &Sessions Judge, Mahendergarh

6 0 0 0 0 200 100 0 0

13 District &Sessions Judge, Panchkula

11 5 2 0 0 640 0 The information in the rest of the applications was supplied to

the applicant.

0

14 District &Sessions Judge, Panipat

4 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 0

15 District &Sessions Judge, Rewari

15 0 0 0 0 480 100 0 0

16 District &Sessions Judge, Rohtak

18 2 0 0 0 400 480 0 0

17 District &Sessions Judge, Sirsa

13 2 0 0 0 500 250 Information was provided 0

18 District &Sessions Judge, Sonepat

7 0 0 0 0 350 10 0 0

19 District &Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar

3 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0

Total 341 31 3 0 0 14110 2170 0 0

50

1 Chief Secretary to Government Haryana,

123 0 0 0 0 3735 3203 58 0

2 Political Department

18 0 0 0 0 410 150 Information sent transferred allfinancial commissioners andprincipals secretariat , Haryana.

0

3 Revenue & Disaster Management & Consolidation

405 0 0 0 0 20070 13492 0 0

4 Urban Local Bodies Department

610 0 0 0 0 23705 14495 Staff has been sensitizedperforma and instructions havebeen displayed on the noticeboard and the public visitingthis office are being taughtregarding the utility of this actand procedure to be followedwhile.

0

5 Technical Education & Industrial Training Department

415 0 0 0 0 13990 21402 Website of the Departmentalready has been launched SPIOand APIOs of the Departmenthave been given trainingregarding by RTI Act by HIPA.

0

6 Irrigation Department

309 0 0 0 0 6580 4631 Being transparent informationspirit & intention of Act is clear.

0

Administrative Secretaries

51

7 Health Department

1454 0 0 0 0 37086 14371 Efforts made in letter & spirit toadminister and implement thespirit and intention of thisAct,though lot of difficultieshave been faced owing to lackof staff and training of the SPIOand his staff attached to him.

0

8 Agriculture Department

1 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0

9 Welfare of SCs & BCs Department

267 0 0 0 0 5500 2525 Every efforts were made toimplement this act

0

Total 3602 0 0 0 50 111076 74269 0 0

Grand Total 32856 1081 65 24 4137 1156218 470944 58 0

52

1 Advocate General (A.G)

2 Animal Husbandry & Dairying (Director General)

3 Archaeology & Museums (Director)

4 Architecture (Chief Architect)

5 Archives (Director)

6 Ayush (Director)

7 Charitable Endowments (Admtr. Genl. & Official Trustee)

8 Census Operations (Director)

9 Civil Aviation (Advisor)

10 Consolidation (Director)

11 Cooperation (Registrar)

12 Economic & Statistical Analysis (ESA)

13 Higher Education (Commissioner)

14 School Education (Director General)

15 Elections (Chief Electoral)

16 Chief Electrical Inspector (Chief Electrical)

17 Employment (Director)

18 State Employment Exchange (Dy. Director)

19 Environment (Director)

20 Exise & Taxation (E.T.C)

21 Fisheries (Director)

22 Food & Supplies (Director)

23 Forests (P.C.C.F)

24 Grievances (Director)

25 Reproductive & Child Health (Project)

26 State TB. Cont. Socy & Leprosy Socy. (Chairman)

27 State TB. Association Haryana (President)

28 ESI (Director)

29 Haryana Institute of Public Administration (HIPA) (Director)

ANNEXURE-'C'List of Major Public Authorities from whom information has not been received

Heads of Department

53

30 Industrial Training & Vocational Education (Director)

31 Institutional Finance & Credit Control (Director)

32 Irrigation (Advisor)

33 Irrigation Research & Management Institute (HIRMI) (Principal Director)

34 Labour (Labour)

35 Land Records (Director)

36 Haryana State Legal Services Authority (Exe Chairman)

37 Local Audit (Director)

38 Lotteries (Director)

39 NIC-Computer Centre (Sr. Tech.)

40 Panchayati Raj Public Works (C.E.)

41 Prisons (D.G)

42 Prosecution (Director)

43 Public Relations & Cultural Affairs (DPR)

44 PW (Water Supply and Sanitation) (EIC)

45 Rehabilitation (Joint Secy.)

46 Renewable Energy (Director)

47 Revenue Training Institute (Principal)

48 Social Justice & Empowerment (Director)

49 Small Savings (Director)

50 Tourism (Director)

51 Town & Country Planning (Director)

52 State Transport Controller (State Transport)

53 Treasuries & Accounts (Director)

54 Urban Local Bodies (Director)

55 Urban Estates (Director)

56 Welfare of Scheduled Castes & Backward Classes (Director)

57 Women & Child Development (Director)

54

1 Agriculture Marketing Board (Chairman)

2 Backward Classes & Economically Weaker Sections Kalyan Nigam (Chairperson)

3 Board of Ayurvedic & Unani Systems of Medicine (Chairman)

4 Council of Homoeopathic System of Medicine (Chairman)

5 Command Area Development Authority (Administrator)

6 Coop. Apex Bank Ltd. (Chairman)

7 Coop. Dev. Fed. Ltd. (M.D)

8 Coop. Labour & Construction Fed. Ltd. (Chairman)

9 Coop. Agri. & Rural Dev. Bank Ltd. (M.D)

10 Fed of Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. (Chairman)

11 Fed of Consumers Coop. Wholesale Stores Ltd. (CONFED) (Chairman)

12 State Counseling Board (Chairman)

13 Dairy Dev. Coop. Fed. Ltd. (Chairperson )

14 Vidyut Prasaran Nigam (HVPN) (Chairman)

15 Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (Chairman)

16 Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (Chairman)

17 Forests Dev. Corpn. Ltd. (HFDC) (Chairman)

18 Handloom & Handicrafts Corpn. Ltd. (Chairman)

19 Scheduled Castes Finance & Dev. Corpn. Ltd. (Chairman)

20 Housing Board (Chairperson)

21 Small Inds. & Export Corpn. Ltd. (Chairman)

22 Indl. Coop. Fed Ltd. (Liquidator)

23 Industrial & Infrastructure Dev. Corpn. Ltd. (HSIIDC) (Chairman)

24 Kala Parishad (Vice-Chairman)

25 Khadi & Village Industries Board (Chairman)

26 Land Reclamation & Dev. Corpn. Ltd. (HLRDC) (Chairman)

27 Land Use Board (Director-cum-Member Secy.)

28 Livestock Dev. Board (Chairman)

29 Shri Mata Mansa Devi Shrine Board (Chairman)

30 Medical Council (President)

31 State Dental Council (President)

Board & corporation

55

32 Nurses Registration Council (President)

33 Mewat Development Agency (Chairman)

34 Minor Irrigation & Tubewells Corpn. Ltd. (MITC) (M.D)

35 Overseas Placement Assistance Society (HOPAS) ( Chairman)

36 Pharmacy Council (Registrar)

37 Police Housing Corpn. Ltd. (Chairman)

38 Pollution Control Board (Chairman)

39 Haryana Prathmik Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad (President)

40 Haryana Panjabi Sahitya Akademi (Chairman))

41 Roads & Bridge Dev. Corpn. Ltd. (Chairman)

42 Rural Dev. Fund Admn. Board (HRDF) (Chairperson)

43 SAMVAD (Chairman)

44 Haryana Sahitya Akedemi (Chairman)

45 Sanskrit Akademi (Chairman)

46 Sanskritic Akademi (Member Secy.)

47 Council for Science & Technology (Chairman/EC)

48 Shivalik Development Board (Chairman)

49 Slum Clearance Board (Chief Admtr.)

50 Social welfare Board (Chairperson)

51 Swatantrata Sainik Samman Samiti (Chairman)

52 Panchkula Circle (Admn. (P))

53 Haryana Urdu Akademi (Chairman)

54 Haryana Women Dev. Corpn. (Chairperson)

55 Swarana Jayanti Shahari Rozgar Yojana & Urban Dev. Society (Project Director)

56 Council for Child Welfare (President)

57 Wakf Board (Chairman)

58 Welfare Society for Hearing & Speech Handicapped (President)

59 Blindness Control Society (Chairperson)

60 Indian Red Cross Society (President)

61 Bhartiya Grameen Mahila Sangh (President)

62 Hind Kusht Nivaran Sangh, Hr. (President)

63 Saket Council (President)

56

64 State Election Commission, Haryana

65 Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC)

66 Haryana State Commission for women (Pkl.)

67 State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Secretary)

68 Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak (Director)

69 Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC)

70 State Information Commission,Haryana, Chandigarh

1 Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala

1 Deputy Commissioner, Ambala

2 Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwami

3 Deputy Commissioner, Fatehabad

4 Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon

5 Deputy Commissioner, Jind

6 Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar

7 Deputy Commissioner, Karnal

8 Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal

9 Deputy Commissioner, Kurukshetra

10 Deputy Commissioner, Mahendergarh (Narnaul)

11 Deputy Commissioner, Palwal

12 Deputy Commissioner, Panipat

13 Deputy Commissioner, Panchkula

14 Deputy Commissioner, Rohtak

15 Deputy Commissioner, Sonepat

16 Deputy Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar

1 District & Sessions Judge, Mewat at Nuh

2 District & Sessions Judge, Palwal

District & Sessions Judge

Divisional Commissioners

Deputy Commissioners

57

1 Environment Department

2 Food & supplied Department & Secretary office of Lokayukta Haryana

3 Home, Jails, Criminal Investigation & Administration of Justice Department

4 Cooperation Department

5 Public Health Engineering Department

6 Women & Child Development Department

7 Finance & IFCC & Planning Departments

8 Excise & Taxation Department

9 Transport & Civil Aviation Department

10 Power Department

11 Forests Department

12 Town & Country Planning & Urban Estates Department

13 Tourism & Housing Departments

14Industries & Commerce, Mines & Geology & Electronics & Information Technology Departments

15 Higher Education & Languages Department

16 Archives Department

17Sports & Youth Affairs & Secretary, Cell for proper utilization/disposal of Government property, nodal officer for monitoring the CM's announcements & looking after the work of monitoring & & Coordination

18 PW(B&R) & Architecture Departments

19Animal Husbandry & Dairying Department & Member Secretary, Third State Finance Commission, Haryana

20 Science & Technology & Renewable Energy Sources Department

21 Archaeology & Museums Department

22School Education, Labour & Employment Departments & Chairperson, Haryana Minerals Ltd. New Delhi

23Development & Panchayats Department & Secretary BAC & Commissioner Gurdwara Elections Haryana

24 Information & Public Relations, Cultural Affairs & Grievances Departments

25 Social Justice & Empowerment Department

26 Printing & Stationery Department

27 C&S, Fisheries Department

28Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana, Elections Department & Director Renewable Energy Sources, Haryana

Administrative Secretaries

58

29 Secretary to Governor, Haryana

30 Haryana Vidhan Sabha Secretariat

59

ANNEXURE- ‘D’

DETAILS OF PENALTY IMPOSED UPON THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 20(1) OF THE RTI Act, 2005 by the Commission. During 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010.

Case No. Date of

Decision Amount of penalty imposed

detail of defaulter SPIO Name/Address of the Public Authority

650/2009 in 2458/2009

6.1. 2010 8500/- Sh. Sushil Kumar VS. Sh. Sadhu Ram Berwal, SPIO-cum- District Elementary Education Officer, Yamunanagar.

The Commissioner & Director General, School Education, Haryana, 30 Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

585/2009 in 2603/2009

12.1. 2010 25000/- Ms. Bansi Bala Vs. Smt. Geeta Sharma, SPIO-cum-Principal, Govt. Girls Sr. Sec. School, Rewari.

The Commissioner & Director General, School Education, Haryana, 30 Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

686/2009 in 2909/2009

13.1. 2010 10000/- Sh. Mukhtiyar Singh Vs. Sh. C.L. Ganda, SPIO-cum-SE, YWS Circle, Sirsa.

Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation Department, Haryana, Sinchai Bhawan, Sector 5, Panchkula.

29/2010 in 280/2009

14.1. 2010 5250/- Sh. D.D. Tyagi Vs. Sh. G.L. Gomber, SPIO-cum-Chief Engineer/Op. UHBVNL, Panchkula.

The Managing Director, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Shakti Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula.

677/2009 in 279/2009

19.1. 2010 6000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Vs. Sh. S.N. Sharma, SPIO-cum-Principal, Vaish College, Bhiwani.

The Managing Committee, Vaish College, Bhiwani.

622/2009 in 2722/2009

19.1. 2010 1100/- Sh. Brij Mohan Sharma Vs. MC, Thanesar.

The Director Urban & Local Bodies, Haryana, SCO No. 6-7, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh.

406/2009 in 162/2009

21.1. 2010 9250/- Sh. Dilbag Singh Vs. Smt. Asha Kiran, SPIO-cum-District Social

The Director, Social Justice & Empowerment, Haryana, SCO No. 68-70, Sector 17-A,

60

Welfare Officer, Sonepat. Chandigarh

309/2009 in 1018/2009

21.1.10 5000/- Sh. Jitender Saharan Vs. Smt. Asha Kiran, SPIO-cum-District Social Welfare Officer, Sonepat.

The Director, Social Justice & Empowerment, Haryana, SCO No. 68-70, Sector 17-A, Chandigarh

469/2009 in 2210/209

21.1.10 3250/- Sh. Ashok Kumar Vs. Smt. Asha Kiran, SPIO-cum-District Social Welfare Officer, Sonepat.


462/2009 in 2087/2009

21.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Anil Malik Vs. Mrs. Anju Sen Deemed SPIO-cum-Assistant Director Colleges-I, O/o Higher Edu. Commissioner, Haryana.

Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula.

586/2009 in 2087/2009

21.1. 2010 6750/- Sh. Anil Malik Vs. Sh. S.P. Singh, SPIO-cum-Assistant Director, EDUSAT, O/o Higher Edu. Commissioner, Haryana.


676/2009 in 343/2009

28.1. 2010 2000/- Sh. Sahab Singh Vs. Sh. M.S. Dahiya, ASPIO-cum-XEN OP. UHBVNL, Sonepat.

The Managing Director, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Shakti Bhawan, Sector 6, PKL.

595/2009 in 2103/2009

28.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Vinod Aggarwal Vs Sh. M.L. Rohilla, SPIO-cum-XEN, (Op), DHBVN, Ballabhgarh.

The Managing Director, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Vidyut Nagar, Hisar.

668/2009 in 2053/2009

29.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Rajinder Singh Vs. Dr. V.V. Chhikara, ASPIO-cum-Principal, Govt. Ayurvedic College, Kurukshetra.

The Director, AYUSH, Sector 3, Near Youth Hostel, Panchkula

628/2009 IN 2696/2009

2.2. 2010 1000/- Sh. Chander Singh Vs Smt. Asha Kiran, SPIO-cum-District Social Welfare Officer, Sonepat.


61

628B/2009 in 2696/2009

2.2. 2010 3500/- Sh. Chander Singh Vs Sh. Satyavan, SPIO-cum- District Social Welfare Officer, Jind.


10/2010 in 3062/2009

11.2. 2010 4000/- Sh. Rajender Kumar Vs Sh. V.P. Nandal, SPIO-cum-OSD, Distant Education MD University, Rohtak.

The Vice Chancellor, Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak.

710/2009 in 317/2009

15.2. 2010 25000/- Sh. Rajesh Kumar Vs Sh. S.K. Aggarwal, SPIO-cum-XEN, Pro Div, PWD B&R Br, Jhajjar

The Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works (B&R), Department, Haryana, Nirmal Sadan, Sector 33, Chandigarh.

343/2009 in 1728/2009

23.2. 2010 5000/- Sh. Fateh Singh Vs Sh. A.K. Jain, SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, MC, Rewari.


88/2010 in 2251/2009

8.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Surender Singh Vs Sh. Jhabar Singh, SPIO-cum-BDPO, Hansi now posted at Nangal Choudhary.

The Director, Development & Panchayats, Haryana, Panchyat Bhawan, Sector 28-A, Chandigarh.

33/2010 in 2643/2009

11.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. N.K. Katra Vs SPIO-cum-SE, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad

The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad

52/2010 in 9/2010

15.3. 2010 11750/- Sh. Virender Singh Vs Principal, L.N. Hindu College, Rohtak

Sh. V.K. Duggal, SPIO-cum-Principal, L.N. Hindu College, Rohtak.

55/2010 15.3. 2010 1000/- Sh. Shakti Singh Sharma Vs Jail & Judicial Department Haryana

Sh. Hari Krishan Pahal, SPIO-cum-Superintendent, Jail & Judicial Branch (now Retd.), # 213, Sector 11, Panchkula

3/2010 in 3045/09

15.3. 2010 13250/- Sh. Krishan Kumar Lohia Vs DHBVN, Hisar

Sh. S.K. Singh, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer (OP), DHBVN, Division No. 1, Hisar

93/2010 in 1021/2010

15.3. 2010 10000/- Sh. Puneet Kumar Vats Vs Principal, L.N. Hindu College, Rohtak

Sh. V.K. Duggal, SPIO-cum-Principal, L.N. Hindu College, Rohtak.

62

719, 588 & 512 of 2009 in 1920/2009

16.3. 2010 1250/- Dr. Raj Kumar Siwatch Vs Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana

Sh. V.S. Malhan-cum-Assistant Director, Colleges-II, O/o Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana, Panchkula.

70/2010 in 387/2009

17.3. 2010 4000/- Sh. Sidharath Yadav Vs SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Rewari.


78/2010 in 1025/2010

22.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Puneet Kumar Vats Vs Principal, Vaish College, Rohtak

Dr. R.K. Garg, SPIO-cum-Principal, Vaish College, Rohtak.

83/2010 in 2550/2009

23.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Mahesh Kumar Vs Sh. Vishvender Sharma, SAO, Finance Department now posted in State Transport Controller, Haryana, Chandigarh.

The Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary to Govt. Haryana, Finance Department in Pay Revision Branch, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh.

84/2010 in 3001/2009

23.3. 2010 25000/- Sh. Anil Bhatia Vs Sh. Ram Kishan, SPIO-cum-Assistant Registrar (Colleges), Kurukshetra University, Kuruksherta.

Vice Chancellor, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra.

95/2010 in 3142/2009

23.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Anil Bhatia Vs Dr. R.K. Tomar SPIO-cum-Principal, Dayanand College, Hisar

The Managing Committee, Dayanand College, Hisar.

666/2009 in 342/2009

26.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Neeraj Bansal Vs Sh. O.P. Pasricha, SPIO-cum-Deputy Director, Treasuries & Accounts Department, Haryana, Chandigarh

The Director, Treasuries & Accounts Department, Haryana, 30-Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

577/2009 in 197/2009

30.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs SPIO-cum-EO, Municipal Council, Bhiwani


576/2009 in 200/2009

30.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs SPIO-cum-EO, Municipal Council,


63

Bhiwani

392/2009 in 131/2009

25/3/2010 10000/- Sh. Lal Chand Rawat Vs Sh. S.K. Malhotra, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Division No. 3, Palwal.

The Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works (Water Supply and Sanitation), Bay 13-18, Sector 4, Panchkula.

124/2010 in 3135/2009

1/4/2010 25000/- Sh. Jagdish Chand Doda Vs Sh. Anil Kumar Walia, SPIO-cum-Architect, Architecture, Haryana.

The Chief Architect, Architecture, Haryana, SCO No. 42-44, Sector 17-A, Chandigarh

66/2010 in 2885/2009

6/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Vaidya Prem Chand Kamboj Vs Dr. Vishaw Kirti Bhardwaj, SPIO-cum-Registrar, Ayurvedic & Unani System of Medicine, Haryana, Ayush Department.


68/2010 in 3131/2009

6/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Vaidya Prem Chand Kaamboj Vs Dr. Vishaw Kirti Bhardwaj, SPIO-cum-Registrar, Ayurvedic & Unani System of Medicine, Haryana, Ayush Department.


71/2010 in 3130/2009

6/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Vaidya Prem Chand Kamboj Vs Dr. Vishaw Kirti Bhardwaj, SPIO-cum-Registrar, Ayurvedic & Unani System of Medicine, Haryana, Ayush Department.


711/2009 in 2800/2009

7/4/2010 10000/- Sh. Satpal Rohilla Vs Sh. Ashiem Khanna, SPIO-cum-XEN, Public Health, Engineering Div. No. 1, Panipat.


64

107/2010 in 3159/2009

8/4/2010 25000/- Sh. Krishan Chand Goel Vs Sh. A.K. Pahwa, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer, Public Health, Engineering Division, Narwana.


67/2010 in 3007/2009

13/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Vijay Gupta of Hisar Vs Sh. Ashok Chaudhary, SPIO-cum-Deputy Civil Surgeon, Hisar

Director General Health Services, Haryana, Sector 6, Panchkula.

35/2010 in 2014/2010

16/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Ghisa Ram of Mahendergarh Vs Sh. Tulsi Ram Sharma, SPIO-cum-Secretary, MC, Mahendergarh now posted at Narnaul.


51/2010 in 2714/2009

20/4/2010 5000/- Sh. Tilak Raj Taneja of Ambala Cantt Vs Sh. Jagmohan Sharma, SPIO-cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Ambala.

Principal, Chief Conservator of Forests, Haryana, Van Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula.

121 & 04/2010 in 3049/2009

20/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Krishan Kumar Lohia Vs Sh. S.K. Singh, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer (OP), DHBVNL, Division No. 1, Hisar


77/2010 in 1020/2010

29/4/2010 9500/- Sh. Hemant Kumar of Rewari Vs Dr. R.K. Bahaker, SPIO-cum-Principal, Satish Public College of Education, Rewari.

The Managing Committee, Satish Public College of Education, Rewari.

167/2010 in 252/2009

30/4/2010 1000/- Sh. Sajjan Singh of Rohtak Vs Sh. Anupam Malik, SPIO-cum-Joint Labour Commissioner, Haryana.

Labour Commissioner, Haryana, 30 Bays Building, 1st Floor, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

699/2009 in 318/2009

15/2/2010 25000/- Sh. Rajesh Kumar of Jhajjar Vs Sh. S.K. Aggarwal, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Public Works (B&R)

Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works (B&R) Department, Haryana, Nirman Sadan, Sector 33, Chandigarh.

65

Branch, Jhajjar.

717/2009 in 2807/2009

5/5/2010 5000/- Sh. Satpal Vs Sh. Randhir Singh, SPIO-cum-Superintending Engineer, Public Health, Engineering Circle, Karnal.


103/2010 in 3155/2009

13/5/2010 2000/- Sh. Dayanand Vs Sh. Ishwar Jain, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Division, Sonepat.

Engineer-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Bay No. 13-18, Sector 4, Panchkula

31/2010 in 2675/2009

3/6/2010 25000/- Sh. A.K. Sharma of Faridabad Vs Sh. Ram Parkash Saini, SPIO O/o Registrar, Cooperation, Haryana, Panchkula

The Registrar, Cooperation, Haryana, Bays 27-30, Sahkarita Bhawan, Sector 2, Panchkula.

470/2009 208/2009 in

16/6/2010 5000/- Sh. Suraj Bhan of Rewari District Vs Sh. Amit Kumar, SPIO-cum-District Social Welfare Officer, Rewari


195/2010 in 102/2010

25/6/2010

750/- Sh. Balram Singh of Ambala Vs Dr. G. Kumar, SPIO-cum-Principal, Medical Officer, General Hospital, Ambala


263/2010 in 1260/2010

25/6/2010 5000/- Sh. Mahavir Singh of KKR Vs Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Kurukshetra


271/2010 in 91/2010

30/6/2010 2000/- Sh. Raj Kumar Sharma of Karnal Vs SPIO-cum-Secretary, Municipal Committee,Indri


12/2010 in 403/2009

1/7/2010 2500/- Sh. Tarsem Kumar Sharma of Karnal Vs Smt. Vimal Bhola, SPIO-cum-District Social

The Director, Social Justice & Empowerment, Haryana, SCO No. 68-70, Sector 17-A,

66

Welfare Officer,Karnal Chandigarh

280/2010 in 1460/2010

13/7/2010 25000/- Sh. Sushil Kumar of Karnal Vs Mrs. Janak Rawal, SPIO-cum-Principal, Shaheed Udham Singh Nursing College, Ratia.

Managing Directos, Shaheed Udham Singh Nursing College, Ratia (Fatehabad).

258/2010 in 1484/2010

14/7/2010 4000/- Sh. Sube Singh of Chandigarh Vs Sh. Azad Singh, SPIO-cum-OSD (D) Department of Development & Panchayat, Haryana.

The Director Development and Panchayats, Haryana, Panchyat Bhawan, Plot No. 3, Sector 28-A, Chandigarh.

300/2010 in 158/2010

20/7/2010 7000/- Sh. Milap Chand Jain of Jind Vs Sh. Palwinder Kumar, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer (Op) UHBVN, Jind


311/2010 in 157/2010

20/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Milap Chand Jain of Jind Vs Sh. Palwinder Kumar, SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer (Op) UHBVN, Jind


203/2010 in 3009/2009

20/7/2010 3500/- Sh. Nanag Ram of Gurgaon Vs Dr. Ram Kumar-cum-SMO, CHC, Chharra

Director General Health Services, Haryana, Panchkula.

252/2010 in 60/2010 in 367/2009

20/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Rameshwar Dass of Kurukshetra Vs Sh. Sunhera Ram, SPIO-cum-Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Nahar, Distt Rewari.


252/2010 in 60/2010 in 367/2009

20/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Rameshwar Dass of Kurukshetra Vs Sh. Brij Lal Sharma, SPIO-cum-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Deeg.


252/2010 in 60/2010 in

20/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Rameshwar Dass of Kurukshetra Vs Sh. Om

The Director Development and Panchayats, Haryana, Panchyat Bhawan, Plot No. 3, Sector

67

367/2009 Parkash Sharma, SPIO-cum-Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Hansi-II.

28-A, Chandigarh.

92A/2010 in 1019/2010

21/7/2010 1000/- Sh. Kartar Singh Saharan of Rohtak Vs Sh. Bhoop Singh, SPIO O/o Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana


44/2010 in 2974/2009

22/7/2010 5000/- Sh. R.P. Singh of Karnal Vs Smt. Rita Devi, SPIO-cum-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Arianpura (Karnal)


234/2010 in 1265/2010

23/6/2010 25000/- Sh. Satbir Singh Rana Vs Sh. Rakesh Kumar, SPIO-cum-XEN, Public Health Engineering Division, Charkhi Dadri.

Engineer-in-Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Bay No. 13-18, Sector 4, Panchkula

306/2010 in 1020/2010

4/8/2010 1000/- Sh. Hemant Kumar of Rewari Vs Dr. R.K. Bhaker, SPIO-cum-Principal, Satish Public College of Education, Rewari

The Managing Director, Satish Public College of Education, Rewari.

155 & 156/2010 in 1170/2010

5/8/2010 1000/- Dr. M.C. Sharma, Advocate, Bhiwani Vs Sh. K.K. Sharma, SPIO-cum-XEN, City Division, DHBVNL, Bhiwani


155 & 156/2010 in 1170/2010

5/8/2010 3500/- Dr. M.C. Sharma, Advocate, Bhiwani Vs Sh. Vijay Pal Yadav, SPIO, S/U DHBVNL (OP), Sub Division Tauru, (Nuh).


282 & 283/2010 5/8/2010 4750/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni, Bhiwani Vs Sh. K.K. Sharma, SPIO-cum-XEN, City Division, DHBVNL, Bhiwani


361/2010 in 10/8/2010 1000/- Sh. Ankur Jain of Yamuna Managing Committee, DAV Colleges, Chitra

68

181/2010 Nagar Vs Principal, DAV College for Girls, Yamuna Nagar.

Road, New Delhi.

152/2010 in 1180/2010

11/8/2010 5000/- Sh. Jasbir Singh Mor, Advocate Vs Sh. P.C. Gupta, SPIO-cum-Superintending Engineer/DSM & EA, DHBVNL, Hisar


253/2010 in 1390/2010

18/8/2010 2000/- Dr.M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Sh. A.K. Jain, SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, M.C. Bhiwani.


359/2010 in 3089/2009

18/8/2010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs Sh. A.K. Jain, SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, M.C. Bhiwani.


360/2010 in 1439/2010

18/8/2010 2000/- Sh. Ankur Kumar of Bhiwani Vs Sh. Vivek Singh, ASPIO-cum-Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Bhiwani


575/2008 in 1706/2007

18/8/2010 5000/- Sh. Virender Singh of Bhiwani Vs Sh. A.K. Jain, SPIO-cum-E.O. Bhiwani


383/2010 in 1707/2010

20/8/2010 2000/- Sh. Kali Ram Naidu of Jind Vs Sh. Jai Singh Tanwar, Secretary, Market Committee, Bhiwani

The Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Mandi Bhawan, C-6, Sector 6, Panchkula.

223/2010 in 1282/2010

20/8/2010 4000/- Sh. Prem Singh of Panchkula Vs SPIO O/o Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Haryana.

Principal, Chief Conservator of Forests, Haryana, Van Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula.

352/2010 in 189/2010

23/8/2010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Sh. A.K.Jain, Executive Officer, M.C. Bhiwani


69

310/2010 in 1480/2010

30/8/2010 2000/- Sh. Dharam Singh Yadav of Bhiwani Vs SPIO-cum-LAO, Bhiwani

Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation Department, Haryana, Sinchai Bhawan, Sector 5, Panchkula.

384/2010 in 251/2010

30/8/2010 2000/- Sh. Pawan Kumar Sharma Vs SPIO-cum-Secretary, M.C. Kalka.


380/2010 in 1503/2010

31/8/2010 5750/- Sh. Vinod Aggarwal of Faridabad Vs Sh. M.L. Rohilla, SPIO-cum-XEN (OP), DHBVNL, Ballabhgarh


379/2010 in 217/2010

31/8/2010 25000/- Sh. Dharambir of Sonepat Vs District Social Welfare Officer, Sonepat


284/2010 in 1410/2009

1-9-2010 3000/- Dr. M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bhiwani.

State Transport Controller, Haryana, 2nd Floor, 30 Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

434/2010 in 1935/2010

16-9-2010 10000/- Sh. Jitender Sharma of Jind Vs Dr. Dhan Kumar, State Public Information Officer-cum-Deputy Civil Surgeon, Jind.


440/2010 in 1935/2010

16-9-2010 6000/- Sh. Jitender Sharma of Jind Vs Sh. Balbir Singh, Deemed State Public Information Officer-cum-Deputy Civil Surgeon, Jind.


439/2010 in 1899/2010

21-9-2010 4000/- Sh. Jitender Kumar Goyal of Bhiwani Vs Smt. Rukmani Parmar, the then SPIO-cum-Assistant Director, Colleges-II, O/o Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana

Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana, Siksha sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula.

432/2010 in 1904/2010

22-9-2010 5000/- Sh. Amir Chand of Kurukshetra Vs Dr. Madhu Sharma, SPIO-


70

cum-Deputy Civil Surgeon, Kuruksehtra

401/2010 in 235/2010

29-9-2010 6250/- Sh. Tej Bhan of Jind Vs Sh. Satyawan, SPIO-cum-District Social Welfare Officer, Jind

Director, Social Justice & Empowerment Department, SCO No. 68-70, Sector 17A, Chandigarh.

376/2010 in 1601/2010

30-9-2010 500/- Sh. G.D. Gupta of Yamuna Nagar Vs Sh. S.P. Singh, Deemed SPIO-cum-Assistant Director O/o the Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana


329/2010 in 1601/2010

30-9-2010 1000/- Sh. G.D. Gupta of Yamuna Nagar Vs Sh. Bhoop Singh, the then SPIO-cum-Assistant Director O/o the Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana.


452/2010 in 186/2010

30-9-2010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Sh. A.K. Jain, Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Palwal.


453/2010 in 187/2010

30-9.-010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Sh. A.K. Jain, Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Palwal.


454/2010 in 215/2010

1/10/2010 1000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs Sh. A.K. Jain the then SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, MC, Bhiwani


456/2010 in 188/2010

1/10/2010 1000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs Sh. A.K. Jain the then SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, MC, Bhiwani


290/2010 in 7/10/2010 5000/- Smt. Angoori Devi, Sonepat Vs The Director, Social Justice & Empowerment,

71

1511/2010 Smt. Asha Kiran Hasija, SPIO-cum-District Social Welfare Officer, Sonepat

Haryana, SCO No. 68-70, Sector 17-A, Chandigarh

375/2010 in 1592/2010

12/10/2010 12500/- Sh. Jagdish Chand Doda Vs Sh. R.L. Goyal, Deemed SPIO (Rs.5000/-)& Sh. Parveer Goyal (Rs.7500/-) Deemed SPIO O/o Chief Architect, Haryana

The Chief Architect, Architecture, Haryana, SCO No. 42-44, Sector 17-A, Chandigarh

448/2010 in 1967/2010

13/10/2010 1000/- Sh. Zile Singh, Delhi Vs State Election Commission, Panchkula

State Election Commission, Panchkula.

385/2009 in 300/2009

13/10/2010 15000/- Sh. Hukam Singh of Nuh Vs Sh. Parveen Kumar the then SPIO-cum-ADC-cum-Chief Executive Officer, DRDA, Gurgaon.

Chief Executive Officer, District Rural Development Agency, Gurgaon

39420/10 in 358/2010 in 231, 231A, 231-B/2010

18/10/2010 5000/- Sh. Vivek Saini, Hisar Vs Sh. R.R. Goel the then SPIO-cum-General Manager (IT), Dakshin Haryana bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Hisar.


126/2010 in 3150/2009

26/10/2010 15000/- Sh. Manmohan Bhartana Vs Smt. Saroj the then SPIO-cum-Sarpanch, G.P. Sanwar (Bhiwani)


520/2010 in 90/2010 in 3014/2009

26/10/2010 15000/- Sh. Zakir Hussain Vs Sh. Unish the then SPIO-cum-Sarpanch, G.P. Khataila Saria Distt Palwal.


705/2009 in 2794/2009

24.9. 2010 25000/- Sh. Kishori Lal of Narnaul Vs Sh. D.K. Gambhir the then

The Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works (Water Supply and Sanitation), Bay 13-18, Sector 4,

72

SPIO-cum-XEN, Public Health, Narnaul now XEN, Public Health, Bhiwani.

Panchkula.

363/2010 in 1539/2010

24.9. 2010 25000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Sh. D.K. Gambhir SPIO-cum-XEN, Public Health, Bhiwani.


346/2010 in 156/2010

24.9. 2010 15000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Sh. J.S. Sabharwal, XEN Public Health, Div-2, Bhiwani


530/2010 in 2041/2010

10.11. 2010 10000/- Sh. Rajesh of Sirsa Vs Sh. S.S. Kohli, CEO, Sirsa Distt Milk Cooperative Milk Producers Union Limited, Sirsa

The Registrar, Cooperation, Haryana, Bays 27-30, Sahkarita Bhawan, Sector 2, Panchkula.

422/2010in 289/2010

9.12. 2010 10000/- Sh. Jain Narain Vs Sh. Bharaj Giri the then SPIO-cum- Block Development Panchayat Officer dadri-I, Bhiwani


73

ANNEXURE ‘E ’

DETAILS OF COMPENSATION AWARDED TO THE APPEALLANTS/COMPLAINANTS

UNDER SECTION 19 (8) (B) OF THE RTI ACT, 2005 DURING 1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010

Case No. Date of Decision Amount of compensation

Detail of Parties

194/2009 in 1303/2009 6.1. 2010 1000/- Sh. Manoj Kumar Karwasra Vs. Estate Officer, HUDA, Hisar

353/2009 6.1. 2010 2000/- Sh. Vineet Segal Vs. Land Acquistion Officer, Panchkula.

366/2009 in 1039/2009 6.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Dharam Pal Vs. DGHS, Haryana

2913/2009 7.1. 2010 2000/- Sh. Raghubir Singh Vs. Deputy. Excise & Taxation, Kaithal

2924/2009 7.1. 2010 4000/- Dr. Himmat Singh Ratnoo Vs. Estate Officer, HUDA, Bahadurgarh

356/2009 7.1. 2010 2000/- Sh. S.C. Mehra Vs. Town & Country Planning, Haryana.

2999/2009 8.1. 2010 2000/- Sh. Jeet Singh Vs. Superintending Engineer(Op), Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitsran Nigam, Karnal.

3048/2009 8.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Narender Kumar Vs. Superintending Engineer (Op), Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam, Bhiwani.

2850/2009 11.1. 2010 1000/- Ms. Rekha Vs. Estate Officer- I, HUDA, Gurgaon

2108/2009 12.1. 2010 5000/- Ms. Rozi Sharma Vs. CAO, Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited, Panchkula.

2957/2009 12.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Bhoop Singh Yadav Vs. Estate Officer-I, HUDA, Gurgaon.

251/2009 in 1212/2009 12.1. 2010 168/- Sh. Madan Lal Sharma Vs. School Education, Haryana.

2937/2009 12.1. 2010 3000/- Ms. Roshni Devi Vs. Land Acquistion Officer, Rohtak

2933/2009 13.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Anil Grover Vs. Estate Officer, HUDA, Panchkula.

74

2959/2009 14.1. 2010 1500/- Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Vs. Information & Public Relation, Haryana.

400/2009 14.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Ashok Kumar Vs. District Social Welfare Officer, Sonepat.

403/2009 14.1. 2010 1000/- Sh. Tarsem Kumar Sharma Vs. District Social Welfare Officer, Karnal.

2269/2009 14.1. 2010 10000/- Dr. Dushyant Gupta Vs Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra

2950/2009 18.1. 2010 2000/- Sh. Deepak Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar.

152/2009 in 1899/2008 19.1. 2010 3000/- Sh. Mahesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Estate Officer, HUDA, Sonepat.

510/2009 in 1168/2009 19.1. 2010 500/- Sh. Hari Singh Kardewal Vs. Estate Officer, HUDA, Karnal.

3068/2009 21.1. 2010 5000/- Sh. Vikas Avasti Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Panchkula.

3075/2009 21.1. 2010 2000/- Sh. Daya Kishan Rathee Vs. Land Acquisition Officer, Rohtak.

3077/2009 21.1. 2010 3000/- Sh. Ram Kishan Verma Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Narnaul.

253/2009 in 162/2009 21.1. 2010 500/- Sh. Dilbag Singh Vs. District Social Welfare Officer, Sonepat.

583/2009 in 2521/2009 21.1. 2010 16000/- Sh. B.R. Dalal Vs. Superintending Engineer Yamuna Water Services, Jind.

3102/2009 28.1. 2010 1000/- Sh. Dharam Pal Vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Gurgaon.

663/2009 in 2884/2009 28.1. 2010 3000/- Sh. Veer Bhan Bhatti Vs. Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra.

3084/2009 28.1. 2010 1100/- Sh. Satish Chander Vs. Staff Selection Commission, Haryana.

3134/2009 1.2. 2010 1000/- Sh. Rajeev Kumar Verma Vs Director General Health Services

3007/2009 2.2. 2010 1000/- Sh. Vijay Gupta Vs Civil Surgeon, Hisar.

3034/2009 2.2. 2010 1000/- Sh. Desh Pal Singh Vs Deputy Commissioner, Panipat.

1052/2010 3.2. 2010 1040/- Sh. Ajit Singh Vs Haryana Public Service Commission.

3/2010 4.2. 2010 1000/- Sh. Surjeet Singh Vs District Revenue Officer, Kurukshetra

19/2010 4.2. 2010 5000/- National Engg. Corporation Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Faridabad

75

2556/2009 9.2. 2010 5000/- Sh. Mohinder Pal Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Faridabad.

1158/2009 10.2. 2010 1200/- Sh. Satender Singh Vs District Education Officer, Rewari

3156/2009 10.2. 2010 10000/- Sh. Smai Singh Vs Industrial Training & Vocational Education, Haryana

24/2010 10.2. 2010 500/- Mrs. Neelam Sobti Vs Social Justice & Empowerment, Haryana

2727/2010 10.2. 2010 2500/- Sh. Balwan Singh Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission.

1019/2010 11.2. 2010 1000/- Sh. Kartar Singh Saharan Vs Higher Education Commissioner.

545/2009 in 2279/2009 11.2. 2010 5000/- Dr. Malik Manopati Vs. SCERT, Gurgaon, Haryana.

3019/2009 11.2. 2010 2000/- Sh. Dharampal Vs Deputy Conservator of Forests, Gurgaon.

143/2010 15.2. 2010 350/- Ms. Tarawanti Vs Land Acquistion Officer, Rohtak

1063/2010 16.2. 2010 10000/- Sh. Vijender of Panipat Vs. PH, Engineering Deptt., Panipat, Haryana.

3183/2009 18.2. 2010 2000/- Sh. Ram Kishan Verma Vs Deputy Commissioner, Narnaul.

3185/2009 18.2. 2010 1000/- Sh.Bhot Ram Vs Deputy Commissioner, Narnaul.

1007/2010 19.2. 2010 3000/- Sh. R.N. Saxena Vs Department of Town & Country Planning, Haryana

3156/2009 10.2. 2010 10000/- Sh. Samay Singh Vs Department of Industrial Training & Vocational Education, Haryana.

411/2009 in 2084/2009 2.3. 2010 500/- Sh. Ram Mehar Narwal Vs O/o the Managing Director, Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam, Panchkula.

392/2009 2.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Rajesh Kumar Singhal of Kurukshetra Vs State Transport Controller, Haryana, 30 Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

340/2009 3.3. 2010 1000/- Sh. Abdul Hameed Khan Vs General Manager, Haryana Roadways Depot, Mewat At Nuh.

1111/2010 4.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Rajneesh of Jind Vs Superintendent of Police, Jind.

3132/2009 4.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Surender Singh Kairon Vs Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Uplana

76

(Hisar)

563/2009 in 1122/2009 4.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Jitesh Kumar Vs Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Hodal.

3177/2009 5.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Subhash Chander Sharma Vs Superintendent of Police, Rewari.

3173/2009 5.3. 2010 3000/- Sh. Chander Singh Negi Vs District Registrar, Firms & Societies, Faridabad.

5/2010 5.3. 2010 1000/- Sh. Narender Singh Pahal Vs Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil), Jind.

88/2010 in 2251/2009 8.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Surender Singh Vs Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Hansi-II.

1070/2010 9.3. 2010 3000/- Sh. Ashok Kumar Puri Vs Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon.

1072/2010 9.3. 2010 1000/- Capt. Harkishan Dahiya Vs Deputy Commissioner, Sonepat.

1034/2010 9.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Raghubir Singh Vs District Education Officer, Rohtak.

1106/2010 11.3. 2010 500/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs O/o the Managing Director, Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Hisar/Bhiwani.

1129/2010 11.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Ramesh Chander Bawa Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Panchkula.

3171/2009 11.3. 2010 500/- Sh. P.S. Singhal Vs O/o the Managing Director, Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula

3086,3090, 3091 & 3095/2009

18.3. 2010 3000/- Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Vs SPIO-cum-Superintendent (Confidential Branch), Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula.

1078/2010 23.3. 2010 500/- Sh. Jeet Ram Yadav Vs SPIO-cum-Superintendent (Confidential Branch), Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula.

2442/2009 23.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Narender Kumar Dhull Vs Govt. College, Nahar.

1161/2010 25.3. 2010 1000/- Capt. Pawan Kumar Anchal Vs Civil Surgeon, Bhiwani.

566/2009 in 2255/2009 25.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Rakesh Vs SPIO-cum-Block Development Panchayat Officer, Sonepat.

62/2010 30.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Raghbir Singh Vs Deputy Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Kaithal

1158/2010 30.3. 2010 5000/- Sh. Pardeep Kumar Sharma Vs Superintendent of Police, Mahendergarh.

77

1157/2010 31.3. 2010 2000/- Sh. Devender Parkash Mittal Vs Principal, Guru Nanak Khalsa College, Yamuna Nagar

1152/2010 5/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Ajit Malik of Panchkula Vs Estate Officer-II, HUDA, Gurgaon.

89/2010 6/4/2010 1000/- Sh. Mewa Singh of Kaithal Vs Executive Engineer (OP), Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Kaithal.

1171/2010 6/4/2010 1000/- Dr. M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Civil Surgeon, Panipat.

2813/2009 8/4/2010 2000/- Sh. R.K. Verma of Chandigarh Vs DCR University of Science & Technology, Sonepat.

1192/2010 8/4/2010 1000/- Sh. Ram Kishan Verma of Narnaul Vs Tehsildar, Narnaul.

1219/2010 8/4/2010 500/- Sh. Ram Juari of Jind Vs SPIO-cum-Superintendent (Confidential), Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula.

1230/2010 15/4/2010 1500/- Sh. Abhey Mishra of Rohtak Vs SPIO-cum-DFO (West), Forest Department, Hisar.

1136/2010 15/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Shiv Lal Sharma of Palwal Vs Principal, Chief Conservator of Forests, Panchkula.

107/2010 20/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Naresh Pawar of New Delhi Vs XEN/Sub-Urban, Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Gurgaon.

1181/2009 21/4/2010 1000/- Sh. M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Superintendent (Confidential), Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula.

1047/2010 28/4/2010 1000/- Smt. Santosh Beniwal of Hisar Vs SPIO-cum-GM/DSM & EA, Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam, Hisar.

1283/2010 28/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Jagan Shah Singh of Faridabad Vs Deputy Conservator of Forests, Faridabad.

1236/2010 28/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Sudesh Kumar Goel of Delhi Vs Chief Secretary (In Services Deptt), Haryana.

1241/2010 29/4/2010 5000/- Sh. Rajiv Singh of Hisar Vs Deputy Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Hisar.

1242/2010 29/4/2010 5000/- Mrs. Prem Lata of Hisar Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Hisar.

78

1243/2010 29/4/2010 5000/- Sh. Kapil Garg Vs Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana.

1204/2010 30/4/2010 2000/- Sh. Manoj Kumar Karwasara of Hisar Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Hisar.

132/2010 30/4/2010 500/- Smt. Sunita Devi of Jind Vs Child Development Project Officer, Jind (Rural)

132A/2010 30/4/2010 500/- Smt. Sunita Devi of Jind Vs Programme Officer, District Level ICDS Cell, Jind.

1266/2010 21/4/2010 5000/- Sh. Manoj Kumar Vs Principal, Industrial Training Institute, Yamuna Nagar.

142/2010 4/5/2010 1000/- Sh. Shri Bhagwan Vashishat, Advocate Vs Gram Brahan Vidya Pracharni Sabha (Regd.), Rohtak.

1245/2010 4/5/2010 3000/- Sh. Virender Thakur Vs FC&PS, Home Department, Haryana.

85/2010 5/5/2010 2000/- Sh. Sukhdev Vs Estate Officer-II, HUDA, Gurgaon.

1254/2010 5/5/2010 3000/- Sh. Prem Singh Vs Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Kalka.

1255/2010 5/5/2010 5000/- Sh. Samrat Singh Rao Vs Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation Ambala Cantt.

1346/2010 7/5/2010 500/- Dr. Rajpal Dhankar of Hisar Vs Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana.

1395/2010 7/5/2010 500/- Sh. Tej Singh of Jind Vs Principal, Daya Nand College, Hisar. 100

1338/2010 7/5/2010 2000/- Sh. Prem Singh of Panchkula Vs Secretary, Municipal Committee, Pinjore.

1211/2010 10/5/2010 5000/- Sh. Tara Chand Jain Vs Commissioner & Secretary, Excise & Taxation Department, Haryana.

68/2010 10/5/2010 5000/- Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Goyal Vs Department of Town & Country Planning, Haryana.

1300/2010 10/5/2010 5000/- Sh. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate Vs Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwani.

36,

2002/2010 in 3010/2009

12/5/2010 2000/- Sh. Daljeet Singh of Yamuna Nagar Vs District Development Panchayat Officer, Yamuna Nagar.

201/2010 in 1221/2010 18/5/2010 5000/- Sh. Jaswinder Kumar of Kaithal Vs Gram Panchayat, Kharkan, The. Guhla, Distt Kaithal.

79

1431/2010 19/5/2010 2000/- Sh. Surender Singh Bisla of Hisar Vs Staff Selection Commission, Haryana, Panchkula.

1379/2010 21/5/2010 1000/- Dr. Anil Pannikar of Hisar Vs CCS, Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar.

1359/2010 26/5/2010 5000/- Sh. S.L. Nijhawan Vs Estate Officer I, HUDA, Gurgaon.

1210/2010 26/5/2010 15000/- Sh. Sham Sunder Duggal Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Panchkula.

1136/2010 27/5/2010 2000/- Sh. Sham Lal Sharma of Palwal Vs Principal, Chief Conservator of Forests, Haryana.

1230/2010 27/5/2010 1500/- Sh. Abhay Mishra of Rohtak Vs Divisional Forest Officer (West), Hisar.

1336/2010 4/5/2010 2000/- Sh. Ravi Dutt Sharma Vs Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation. Bhiwani.

1343/2010 4/5/2010 5000/- Dr. M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Public Work Department (B&R) Branch, Bhiwani.

10/2010 1/6/2010 1000/- Mrs. Tripta Kaur of Delhi Vs Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Karnal

126/2010 2/6/2010 5000/- Sh. Kamlesh Kumar of Ambala Cantt Vs Land Acquisition Officer, Panchkula

128/2010 2/6/2010 5000/- Smt. Prem Goyal of Faridabad Vs Estate Officer-II, HUDA, Gurgaon

1410/2010 2/6/2010 2000/- Dr. M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bhiwani

31/2010 in 2675/2009 3/6/2010 5000/- Sh. A.K. Sharma of Faridabad Vs Cooperation, Haryana, Panchkula

1393/2010 4/6/2010 15000/- Sh. Umesh Kumar Bhardwaj of Sonepat Vs Estate Officer-II, HUDA, Gurgaon

1394/2010 4/6/2010 2000/- Sh. Dharam Singh of New Delhi Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Sonepat

1498/2010 8/6/2010 2000/- Mohd. Ashraf of Gurgaon Vs Deputy General Manager/City (Op) Division, DHBVN, Gurgaon.

1450/2010 10/6/2010 5000/- Sh. Khushi Ram of Hisar Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Bahadurgarh

1457/2010 11/6/2010 3000/- Sh. Jagbir Singh Punia of Delhi Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Bahadurgarh.

80

192/2010 16/6/2010 3000/- Sh. Gulshan Mehta of Chandigarh Vs Director General Health Services, Haryana.

194/2010 in 1105/2010 22/6/2010 5000/- Sh. Naresh Kumar Joon of Jhajjar Vs Senior Medical Officer,General Hospital, Bahadurgarh.

1586/2010 23/6/2010 500/- Sh. Sanjay Kumar Vashisht of Bhiwani Vs Principal, Dayanand College, Hisar

1598/2010 23/6/2010 500/- Sh. Sanjay Kumar Vashisht of Bhiwani Vs Principal, Dayanand College, Hisar

1633/2010 24/6/2010 1100/- Sh. Baljeet Raj of Sirsa Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Haryana, Panchkula

183/2010 30/6/2010 5000/- Sh. R.K. Gupta of Faridabad Vs Land Acquisition Officer, Panchkula/Urban Estate Department, Haryana

11/2010 1/7/2010 500/- Sh. Jitender Singh of Mewat Vs Civil Surgeon, Mewat.

1557/2010 1/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Vijay Goswami of Mahendergarh Vs. District Revenue Officer, Narnaul

214/2010 1/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Bhiwani

1566/2010 6/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Jai Parkash of Jind Vs General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Chandigarh.

1587/2010 7/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Durga Dutt of Chandigarh Vs General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Chandigarh

1590/2010 7/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Pardeep Kumar Sharma of Mahendergarh Vs Director General of Police, Panchkula

2318/2009 7/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs District Consumers Disputes & Redressal Forum, Bhiwani

1438,1440 & 1441/2010 8/7/2010 2100/- Sh. B.R. Dalal of Jind Vs SPIO-cum-Director, Water Resources, Irrigation Department, Haryana.

1629/2010 13/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Nain Singh Tyagi of Sonepat Vs Superintending Engineer (Op) Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam, Sonepat.

1773/2010 20/7/2010 1000/- Sh. Ramesh Chand of Mohali Vs Deputy Civil Surgeon, Panchkula.

81

1778A/2010 20/7/2010 1000/- Sh. Dilaram of Delhi Vs CCS, Haryana Agriculture University, Hisar

235/2010 in 47/2010 20/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Pawan Sharma of Kurukshetra Vs Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Kheri, Dabdalan (Kurukshetra).

1638/2010 22/7/2010 5000/- Smt. Janak Dulari of Chandigarh Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Panchkula

1672/2010 22/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Satya Narain of Ganaur Vs Tehsildar, Gohana

1425/2010 22/7/2010 2000/- Smt. Suman Soni Vs Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Haryana, Panchkula

1427/2010 22/7/2010 1000/- Smt. Champa Devi of Mehendergarh Vs Superintendent of Police, Narnaul

242/2010 22/7/2010 1000/- Sh. Suresh Goyal of Faridabad Vs Superintending Engineer, HUDA, Faridabad.

1623/2010 23/7/2010 2000/- Smt. Munni Devi of Bhiwani Vs Excise & Taxation Commissioner, Haryana, Panchkula

256/2010 23/7/2010 1000/- Mrs. Padma Aggarwal of Sangrur Vs District Town Planner, Ambala City

1693/2010 27/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Partap Singh of Bhiwani Vs Transport Commissioner, Haryana.

1694/2010 28/7/2010 3000/- Sh. Satya Narain Gupta of Ambala Cantt Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Ambala

1695/2010 28/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Satish Kumar Jain of Sonepat Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Sonepat

1696/2010 28/7/2010 5000/- Mrs. Annu Garg of Faridabad Vs Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana

1697/2010 28/7/2010 3000/- Mrs. Annu Garg of Faridabad Vs Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana

1746/2010 29/7/2010 2000/- Sh. Ram Kumar Samadhian of Panchkula Vs Land Acquistion Officer, Urban Estate, Haryana, Panchkula

1748/2010 29/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Sulakshan Bhardwaj of Faridabad Vs Transport Commissioner, Haryana, Chandigarh

283/2010 29/7/2010 500/- Sh. Krishan Lal of Kuruksehtra Vs Superintending Engineer, Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam, Kurukshetra

1745/2010 29/7/2010 1000/- Sh. Phul Singh, Punhana Vs SPIO-cum-Secretary, Municipal Committee, Ponhana.

82

1766/2010 29/7/2010 2500/- Sh. Amar Singh of Rewari Vs SPIO-cum-Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Rewari

122/2010 in 2131/2009 30/7/2010 5000/- Sh. Vinod Aggarwal of Faridabad Vs Sh. M.L. Rohilla SPIO-cum-Executive Engineer (Op), Ballabhagarh

1913/2010 2.8. 2010 5000/- Sh. Satish Kumar Sharma of Ambala City Vs District Elementary Education Officer, Ambala.

1836/2010 3/8/2010 500/- Sh. Ram Mehar Sharma of Jind Vs Director General, Health Services, Panchkula

1839/2010 4/8/2010 500/- Sh. Rajeshwar Parsad Gupta of Jhajjar Vs Chief Medical Officer, Jhajjar.

262/2010 4/8/2010 500/- Smt. Krishna Dahiya Vs Programme Officer, District Level, ICDS Cell, Faridabad

264/2010 4/8/2010 500/- Smt. Krishna Dahiya Vs Programme Officer, District Level, ICDS Cell, Faridabad

261/2010 4/8/2010 500/- Sh. Ram Niwas Kaushik of Sonepat Vs Deputy Labour Commissioner, Haryana

298/2010 5/8/2010 1000/- Sh. Sham Sunder Dudeja of Panipat Vs Superintending Engineer (OP), Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Panipat.

1873/2010 10/8/2010 500/- Sh. Dharambir of Panipat Vs District Family Welfare Officer, Panipat.

235/2010 10/8/2010 500/- Sh. Tej Bhan of Jind Vs District Social Welfare Officer of Jind.

1916/2010 10/8/2010 1000/- Sh. Prem Singh of Panchkula Vs Municipal Committee, Pinjore

1870/2010 11/8/2010 500/- Miss Jyoti Rukhaya of Fatehabad Vs Maharaja Agarsain Medical College, Agroha.

1956/2010 in 1077/2010 19/8/2010 500/- Sh. Anil Kumar Garg of Sirsa Vs CMK National Post Graduate Girls College, Sirsa.

1960/2010 19/8/2010 500/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Principal, Medical Officer, General Hospital, Bhiwani.

291/2010 19/8/2010 1100/- Sh. Arun Kaushik of Mahendergarh Vs Staff Selection Commission, Haryana, Panchkula

1927/2010 24/8/2010 3000/- Sh. Virender Thakur of Ambala Cantt Vs FC&PS to Govt. Haryana, Home Department

83

2002/2010 24/8/2010 1000/- Dr. Ram Niwas of Sirsa Vs Haryana Public Service Commission, Panchkula

2024/2010 25/8/2010 1000/- Sh. Rajesh Kumar Jindal of Rohtak Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula

236A/2010 25/8/2010 1000/- Sh. Vinod Kumar Vs District Welfare Officer, Faridabad

265/2010 26/8/2010 500/- Smt. Sunita Devi of Rewari Vs State Election Commission, Haryana, Panchkula

1898/2010 26/8/2010 1000/- Sh. Sanjay Kumar Vashisht Vs Dayanand College Hisar.

1851/2010 26/8/2010 2000/- Mohd. Ashraf of Gurgaon Vs Estate Officer-I, HUDA, Gurgaon

2033/2010 27/8/2010 500/- Sh. Abhay Mishra of Rohtak Vs Principal, Chief Conservator of Forests, Haryana

1968/2010 31/8/2010 2000/- Sh. H.C. Arora of Chandigarh Vs Town & Country Planning, Haryana, Chandigarh

1980/2010 31/8/2010 1000/- Sh. M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Staff Selection Commission, Haryana.

1962/2010 1-9-2010 3000/- Sh. Sohan Lal of Chandigarh Vs Transport Commissioner, Haryana, Chandigarh.

1964/2010 1-9-2010 1000/- Sh. Kulraj Kumar Bhardwaj of Faridabad Vs Town & Country Planning, Haryana, Chandigarh

2104/2010 6-9-2010 500/- Sh. Pankaj Kumar of Sirsa Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula.

2030/2010 6-9-2010 500/- Dr. Ravi Dutt of Mahendergarh Vs Haryana Public Service Commission, Panchkula

2130/2010 7-9-2010 5000/- Sh. Sajiv Chaturvedi of Panchkula Vs FC & PS to Govt. Haryana, Forest Department.

2144/2010 8-9-2010 500/- Sh. Amit Kumar of Kurukshetra Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula.

2149/2010 9-9-2010 1500/- Sh. Samay Ram Hooda of Rohtak Vs Haryana Public Service Commission, Panchkula.

413/2010 in 1868/2010 16-9-2010 1500/- Sh. Surinder Kumar Alias Saleem Khan Vs Municipal Council, Tohana.

2111/2010 16-9-2010 1000/- Sh. Balwan Singh of Jind Vs Civil Surgeon, Jind.

84

2113/2010 16-9-2010 2000/- Sh. Ishwar Chand of Yamuna Nagar Vs Civil Surgeon, Karnal.

2040/2010 16-9-2010 500/- Sh. Brij Bhan of Jind Vs Civil Surgeon, Jind.

2004/10 16-9-2010 1000/- Sh. Devender Kumar of Jind Vs Superintending Engineer/OP, UHBVNL, Jind.

2211/2010 21-9-2010 1000/- Sh. Ravinder Kumar of Jhajjar Vs Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana, Panchkula.

1970/2010 21-9-2010 10000/- Sh. Raghbir Singh of Rohtak Vs Estate Officer-II, HUDA, Gurgaon.

2156/2010 22-9-2010 500/- Sh. Krishan Kumar of Jind Vs Director General, Health Services, Haryana, Panchkula

2159/2010 22-9-2010 500/- Sh. Krishan Kumar of Jind Vs Director General, Health Services, Haryana, Panchkula.

1730/2011 22.9.2010 5000/- Sh. Ram Chander Vs City Magistrate, Mahendergarh.

1909/2010 22.9.2010 2000/- Sh. Jagdev Singh Vs HSRBDCL, Panchkula.

1984/2010 22-9-2010 2000/- Sh. Subhash Chander Sharma of Rewari Vs Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rewari. 200

2200/2010 24-9-2010 1000/- Sh. Raj Kumar Verma of Karnal Vs Deputy Civil Surgeon, Karnal.

2297/2010 24-9-2010 1000/- Sh. Ramesh Verma of Hisar Vs Financial Commissioner & Principal Secretary to Govt. Haryana, Health Services, Haryana.

363/2010 in 1539/2010 24.9. 2010 5000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Executive Engineer, Public Health, Bhiwani.

1993/2010 28-9-2010 10000/- Sh. O.P. Kumar of Karnal Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Karnal.

1995/2010 28-9-2010 3000/- Sh. Veer Singh of Bhiwani Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Bahadurgarh.

2071/2010 28-9-2010 5000/- Sh. Harman Singh Sandhu of Chandigarh Vs Transport Commissioner, Haryana, Chandigarh

342/2010 28-9-2010 1000/- Mrs. Urmila Duhan of Gurgaon Vs Deen Bandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science & Technology, Murthal.

85

1997/2010 29-9-2010 5000/- Sh. R.L. Arora of Hisar Vs Estate Officer, HUDA, Hisar

2007/2010 29-9-2010 5000/- Sh. Rakesh Ashtana of Delhi Vs Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana.

226/2010 in 1618/2009 30-9-2010 5000/- Mrs. Santosh Beniwal of Hisar Vs Superintending Engineer/Power Procurement, DHBVNL, Hisar.

2254/2010 30-9-2010 1000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni of Bhiwani Vs Superintending Engineer (OP), DHBVN, Bhiwani.

1876/2010 30-9-2010 500/- Sh. Rambhaj Saini of Sonepat Vs Superintending Engineer (OP), UHBVNL, Sonepat.

2313/2010 30-9-2010 1000/- Smt. Raj Bala of Rohtak Vs Staff Selection Commission, Haryana, Panchkula.

2311/2010 6.10.2010 500/- Sh. Ram Mehar Sharma, Jind Vs Director General Health Services, Panchkula






2107/2010 6.10.2010 500/- Sh. Kapil Dev of Panipat Vs Staff Selection Commission, Haryana, Panchkula.

1763/2010 7.10.2010 2800/- Sh. Umed Singh Saini of Jind Vs Forest Department, Haryana.

2296/2010 7.10.2010 1000/- Sh. Rajesh Chand of Ambala Cantt Vs HVPNL, Panchkula

2160/2010 13.10.2010 1000/- Sh. Ramesh Verma Vs Director General Health Services, Panchkula

2349/2010 19.10.2010 1000/- Dr. M.C. Sharma, Bhiwani Vs Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Bhiwani

2376/2010 19.10.2010 500/- Ms. Neelam Kharangar, Ambala Cantt Vs Principal, GMN College, Ambala Cantt.

2234/2010 19.10.2010 2000/- Sh. M.C. Sharma Vs Haryana Public Service Commission, Panchkula.

86

2379/2010 20.10.2010 1000/- Sh. Krishan Kumar Lohia Vs DakshinHaryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited. , Hisar

2369/2010 21.10.2010 500/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs DakshinHaryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Bhiwani

304/2010 in 346/2009 21.10.2010 1000/- Sh. Deen Dayal Soni Vs Haryana Naturopathy Hospital, Bhiwani.

2385/2010 21.10.2010 500/- Sh. Rajeshwar Prasad Vs Deputy Civil Surgeon, Jhajjar.

363/2010 27.10.2010 1000/- Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs Deputy Civil Surgeon, Karnal

2465/2010 27.10.2010 1500/- Sh. P.C. Chaudhary Vs Irrigation Department, Haryana, Panchkula

368/2010 4.11. 2010

500/- Sh. Surender Singh Vs Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula

2310/2010 8.11. 2010 1000/- Dr. S.C. Aggarwal of Panipat Vs Principal, SD (PG) College, Panipat

2464/2010 8.11. 2010 1500/- Sh. Shruti Goel of Hisar Vs Executive Officer, MC, Hisar.

2357/2010 9.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Parveen Kumar of PKL Vs Superintendent of Police, Panipat

2359/2010 9.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Dharampal Vs Deputy Commissioner of Police, Gurgaon

2332/2010 9.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Umrao Singh of Mahenergarh Vs Tehsildar, Mahendergarh.

2519/2010 9.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Jiwan Jindal of Chandigarh Vs Haryana Agro Inds. Corporation, Panchkula

394/2010 9.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Chandan Singh Verma Vs Civil Surgeon, Sonepat.

2368/2010 10.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Surender Singh Dhillon of Narnaul Vs DRO, Narnaul

530/2010 in 2041/2010 10.11. 2010 5000/- Sh. Rajesh of Sirsa Vs Executive Officer, Dairy Association, Sirsa.

2366/2010 10.11. 2010 500/- Smt. Qaisar Jahan Vs Haryana Urban Development Authority, Gurgaon.

2516/2010 11.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. PArdeep Bhardwaj Vs Executive Enginner/Op. Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Bhiwani

2535/2010 11.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Uma Shankar Suthar Vs Executive Engineer, Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Bhiwani

87

2386/2010 11.11. 2010 500/- Smt. Neelam Mohan of Ambala City Vs Secretary, District Red Cross Society, Ambala

2388/2010 11.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Suraj Parkash Vs Transport Depratment.

1796/2010 11.11. 2010 1500/- Sh. Naresh Joon of Jhajjar Vs Estate Officer,Municipal Corporation, Bahadurgarh, Jhajjar.

347/2010 11.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Gaur Vs SDM, Registration Authority, Sonepat.

2299/2010 12.11. 2010 1000/- Ms. Sunita VS Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula.

1931/2010 16.11. 2010 & 29.11. 2010

1000/- Sh. Vikas Tushir of Sonepat Vs Inspector General of Police, Panchkula.

2440/2010 18.11. 2010 500/- Ms. Vishu Phogat, VS Deputy Superintendent of Police (Crime), Panchkula.

2439/2010 18.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Randhir Singh of Panipat Vs Sub Divisional Officer (C), Panipat

2676/2010 19.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Shri Chand Vats Vs Secretary, Municipal Committee, Sonepat.

2487/2010 23.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Ajeet Singh of Bhiwani Vs Tehsilder, Charkhi Dadri, Dist Bhiwani.

2582/2010 23.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Mohkam Singh Dhull Vs Jat High School, Shiksha Society, Kaithal

2608/2010 23.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Subhash, Editor of Rohtak Vs Director, School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh

2074/2010 24.11. 2010 2000/- Sh. Ram Bhaj Saini of Sonepat Vs Tehsildar, Sonepat

2779/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Faridabad.

2786/2010 24.11. 2010 2000/- Sh. Jagjeevan of Jhajjar Vs Director, School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh.

2779-C/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Sonepat

2781/2010 24.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. PRem Singh of KKR Vs Director, School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh

2777/2010 24.11. 2010 2000/- Sh. Rajeev Sharma Vs Director, School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh

2779-D/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Sonepat

88

2779-G/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Sonepat

2779-E/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Sonepat

2779-H/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Sonepat

2779-B/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Sonepat

2779-F/2010 24.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sandeep Singh of Jhajjar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Sonepat

2667/2010 24.11. 2010 1000/- Dr. Ravi Dutt of Mahendergarh Vs HPSC, Panchkula.

2530/2010 25.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Kapoor Singh Vs SE, UHBVNL, Jind

2065/2010 25.11. 2010 2000/- Dr. Satya Dev of Faridabad Vs Director, School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh

2507/2010 25.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Kashi Ram of Mahendergarh Vs DRO, Narnaul

2619/2010 25.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Kapoor Singh Vs SE, UHBVNL, Jind

2694/2010 25.11. 2010 5000/- Sh. Balbir Singh, Bhiwani Vs District Social Welfare Officer, Bhiwani.

2788/2010 26.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Sadhu Singh Vs Director, School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh

2794/2010 26.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Rajesh Kumar Vs Deputy District Education Officer, Jhajjar

2791/2010 26.11. 2010 500/- Sh. N.R. Bansal of Bhiwani Vs Vaish Sr. Sec. School, Charkhi Dadri

2835/2010 26.11. 2010 500/- Sh. N.L. Kumar of Charkhi Dadri of Bhiwani Vs DHBVNL, Bhiwani

1932/2010 29.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Vikas Tushir Vs IG of Police, Panchkula

1930/2010 29.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Vikas Tushir of Sonepat Vs FC&PS, Home Department, Haryana, Chandigarh.

2412/2010 29.11. 2010 1000/- Sh. Rajesh Bharti of New Delhi Vs DGP, Panchkula

2181/2010 29.11. 2010 1000/- Smt. Prtibha of Rohtak, Tehsildar, Rohtak

2631/2010 30.11. 2010 500/- Sh. Rakesh of Ambala Cantt Vs District Election Officer, Ambala City

2542/2010 1.12.2010 500/- Sh. Pardeep Kumar Vs Inspector General of Police, Panchkula

89

565,594,596,597/2010 in 2743/2010

1.12.2010 5000/- Sh. Ram Dia Chaudhary Vs. Director Development Panchayat Officer, Sonipat.

2637/2010 2.12.2010 1000/- Sh. Kanwal Sharma Vs. District Revenue Officer, Sonipat

2328/2010 3.12.2010 500/- Sh. Devender Vs. District Revenue Officer ,Jind

2323/2010 3.12.2010 500/- Sh. Rajesh Sindhu Vs. District Revenue Officer ,Rohtak

2547/2010 7.12.2010 1000/- Sh. Subhash Chander Jain Vs. Deputy District Education Officer ,Hisar

411/2010 in 1147/2010 7.12.2010 2000/- Sh. Vinod Aggarwal Vs. Dakshin Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Faridabad

2562/2010 7.12.2010 500/- Sh. Gurbax Singh Vs. Director School Education , Haryana

377/2010 8.12.2010 1000/- Sh. Roshan Lal Bhardwaj Vs. Revenue & Disaster Management, Deptt.

2581/2010 8.12.2010 500/- Sh. Om Parkash Vs. District Education Officer, Bhiwani.

372/2010 9.12.2010 1000/- Sh. R.P. Girdahar, Vs Director, School Education, Haryana

373/2010 9.12.2010 1000/ Sh. R.P. Girdahar, Vs Director, School Education, Haryana

2325/2010 10.12.2010 1000/- Sh. Pardeep Kumar Vs District Revenue Officer, Narnaul

3041/2010 10.12.2010 300/- Sh. Pardeep Kumar Vs. District Education Officer, Rewari 300

3040/2010 13.12.2010 500/- Sh. Om Parkash Vs. Deputy District Education Officer, Nuh

3044/2010 13.12.2010 500/- Sh. Mahavir Singh Vs. Director, School Education, Haryana

3054/-2010 13.12.2010 500/- Sh. Gurbax Singh Vs. Director, School Education, Haryana

2696/2010 14.12.2010 1000/- Smt. Saroj Kumari Vs. DFSL, Karnal.

485/2010 in 1713/2010 14.12.2010 2500/- Sh. Kaptan Singh Vs. Urban Local Bodies, Deptt. Chandigarh.

2713/2010 15.12.2010 500/- Sh. Om Singh Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Gurgoan.

2730/2010 17.12.2010 2000/- Sh. Dalbir Singh VS. Director General of Police, Panchkula

90

2734/2010 17.12.2010 500/- Sh. Inderjit Kumar, Vs. City Magistrate, Y. Nagar.

2748/2010 17.12.2010 500/- Sh. M.C. Sharma Vs. Sub Divisional Officer (C), Bhiwani.

2322/2010 17.12.2010 2000/- Ms. Vishu Phogat Vs. Inspector General of Police, (Personal)Panchkula.

2883/2010 21.12.2010 1000/- Sh. Chander Bhan Vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula

2718/2010 22.12.2010 700/- Sh. Ram Kishan Vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula

2386/2010 24.12.2010 500/- Smt. Neelam Mohan Vs. DRCS, Ambala

2872/2010 28.12.2010 5000/- Smt. Kanchan Kumari Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon.

2514/2010 28.12.2010 1000/- Sh. Ram Nath Vs. Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula

2276/2010 29.12.2010 700/- Sh. B.R. Dalal Vs. Irrigation Deptt.




91

ANNEXURE-‘F’

List of cases in which recommendations were made to initiate Disciplinary Proceedings During1.1.2010 to 31.12.2010 by the Commission.

Case No Particular of case Date of Decision

No. defaulter employees

Name of Public Authority

81/2010 in 2020/2008

Sh. JitenderKaushalVs Estate Officer-I, HUDA, Gurgaon

4/8/2010 2 Chief Administrator, HUDA, Panchkula.

1839/2010 Sh. RajeshwarParsad Gupta of Jhajjar Vs Civil Surgeon, Jhajjar

4/8/2010 Responsibility is to be fixed

Civil Surgeon, Jhajjar

1899/2010 Sh. Jitender Kumar Goyal of Bhiwani Vs Higher Education Commissioner, Panchkula

17/8/2010 Enquire and fix responsibility

Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana

286/2010 in 1435/2010

Dr. M.C. Sharma of Bhiwani Vs Director General Health Services, Haryana

19/8/10 1 Director General Health Services, Haryana

236/2010 in 1757/2010

Sh. Jog Ram Sharma of Ambala Vs Municipal Corporation,AmbalaSadar

19/8/2010 1 Director Urban Local Bodies, Haryana

132/2010 in 49/2010

Sh. Karam Singh of Karnal Vs District Social Welfare Officer, Karnal

23/8/2010 1 Director, Women & Child Development, Haryana, Panchkula.

2028/2010 Sh. Lal Chand of Panchkula Vs Social Justice & Empowerment, Haryana

27/8/2010 Enquire and fix responsibility

Director, Social Justice & Empowerment Department, Haryana

284/2010 in 1410/2009

Dr. M.C. Sharma Vs Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bhiwani

1/9/2010 1 State Transport Controller, Haryana, 2nd Floor, 30 Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

315/2010 Sh. DeenDayalSoni of Bhiwani Vs Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Bhiwani

9/9/2010 DC to conduct enquiry

Deputy Commissioner, Bhiwani

313/2010 in 1497/2010

Sh. Chattar Singh of Jind Vs Superintending Engineer/OP, Uttar Haryana BijaliVitran Nigam Limited, Jind

16/9/2010 1 Managing Director, Uttar Haryana BijaliVitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula

439/2010 in 1899/2010

Sh. Jitender Kumar Goyal of Bhiwani Vs Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana

21/9/2010 4 Higher Education Commissioner, Haryana, Sikshasadan, Sector 5, Panchkula.

244 & 245A/2010 in 1346/2010

Dr. RajpalDhankar of Hisar Vs Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana, Chandigarh

30/9/2010 Responsibility is to be fixed

Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana, Chandigarh.

786/2010 Sh. JagjeevanVs Director, School Education, Haryana, Chandigarh

24/11/2010 1 DirectorSchool Education, Haryana

92

3265/2010 Sh. AnandParkash Sharma Vs SDO (C), Rewari

20/4/2011 1 Deputy Commissioner, Rewari.

FIFTH REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RTI ... - CIC...

Documents

Transcript of FIFTH REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RTI ... - CIC...