Fifth lites.asia workshop · ssl.iea-4e.org To provide governments with: Tools to assess the...

Hanoi, Vietnam

28-29 June 2012

Fifth lites.asia workshop

David Boughey

Australian Department of Climate Change and

Energy Efficiency

Update on 4E SSL Annex Activities

ssl.iea-4e.org

8 Funding countries:

France, Australia, The Netherlands, United

Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark, Japan, USA

Others member countries welcome

The SSL Annex 2010-2014

ssl.iea-4e.org

To provide governments with:

Tools to assess the performance of SSL,

Information assisting formation of energy-efficient

lighting policies, and

Harmonized test procedures and laboratory

accreditation

in order to increase confidence in Solid State

Lighting in the marketplace. 4

Goal of SSL Annex (2010-2014)

ssl.iea-4e.org

Definition of key performance characteristics

Suite of minimum performance levels for SSLs

International specification for SSL replacement

lamp equivalency claims

Test methods for testing performance

characteristics of SSLs

Coordination of international accreditation of test

labs for SSLs 5

Outputs of SSL Annex 2010-2014

ssl.iea-4e.org

Task 1: Develop SSL Quality Assurance

Create performance tiers, address equivalency claims

Collect data on Life Cycle Assessment, Health issues

Task 2: SSL Testing

Harmonize testing protocols (CIE, IEC, ANSI, etc.)

Round Robin #1 to calibrate 4 Nucleus laboratories

Round Robin #2 to calibrate participating laboratories

Propose proficiency testing procedure for accreditation

Task 3: Harmonize International Accreditation

SSL Annex: Three main tasks

ssl.iea-4e.org

Minimum Performance requirements for 4 product

categories (released for comment November 1,

2011)

http://ssl.iea-4e.org/

Non-

directional

Lamps

Directional

Lamps

Downlight

Fixtures

LED Linear

Fluorescent

replacement

lamps

Task 1: Quality Assurance





ssl.iea-4e.org

Tier 0: Minimum acceptable performance for Off-Grid

Tier 1: Minimum acceptable performance for Grid-Connected

Tier 2: Performance required by established quality programs

Tier 3: Current highest commercially available performance

Philosophy: health aspects are non negotiable, SSL

performance is higher than the products they replace.

Defining Performance Tiers

ssl.iea-4e.org

Example of draft documents

ssl.iea-4e.org

Tiers & Benchmark tests results

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Tier 0 (off grid)

ssl.iea-4e.org

Tier

Minimum

Efficacy

(lm/W)

Minimum

Lifetime -

L70 & B50

(h)

Minimum

Colour

Rendering

Index

0 (Off-grid) 50 5 000 N/A

1 50 15 000 70

2 65 25 000 80

and R9 > 0

3 80 25 000 80

and R9 > 0

Omni-directional Lamps key

parameters

ssl.iea-4e.org

Tier

Minimum

Efficacy

(lm/W)

Minimum

Lifetime -

L70 & B50

(h)

Minimum

Colour

Rendering

Index

0 (Off-grid) N/A for this product

1 40 30 000 70

2 55 35 000 80

and R9 > 0

3 70 40 000 80

and R9 > 0

Downlights key parameters

ssl.iea-4e.org

Tier

Minimum

Efficacy

(lm/W)

Minimum

Lifetime -

L70 & B50

(h)

Minimum

Colour

Rendering

Index

0 (Off-grid) N/A for this product

1 80 30 000 80

2 96 35 000 80

and R9 > 0

3 120 50 000 80

and R9 > 0

Linear SSL key parameters

ssl.iea-4e.org

Many comments were received by SSL Annex

on the proposed tiers for the 4 interior SSL

types

Responses by the Annex to these comments

have been placed on the website: http://ssl.iea-4e.org/files/otherfiles/0000/0021/IEA_4E_SSL_Annex_Reponse_to_Stakeholders_April_20_2012.pdf

Responses to public comment

submissions

http://ssl.iea-4e.org/files/otherfiles/0000/0021/IEA_4E_SSL_Annex_Reponse_to_Stakeholders_April_20_2012.pdf



ssl.iea-4e.org

First part of report (Literature review) awaiting

approval to be published publicly

Will notify Lites.Asia members once available to

public

Remaining 2 parts to be drafted after

completion of current US Dept of Energy

project on lamp LCA

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

ssl.iea-4e.org

Greatest impact of lamp technology is related to luminous efficacy of system (energy, CO2)

LED non-directional lamps are not better than CFL lamps

LED directional lamps are better than Halogen

Minimum lamp life guarantees benefits

Specify minimum luminous efficacy and product lifetime if compared with fluorescent lamps

Specify minimum efficacy and possible lower lifetime if compared with halogen lamps

Life Cycle Assessment

ssl.iea-4e.org

Photo-biological safety standard should be revised for LEDs

The standard doesn’t take into account how lamps and lamp systems are really used

Susceptible populations: children, ARMD patients, pseudo-physic, etc.

Stroboscopic effects, EMF, circadian rhythms: poorly studied

No labeling/marking

Health aspects

ssl.iea-4e.org

Refer to risk categories, compare with other technologies, suggest approach for testing procedures.

Introduce photo-biological safety requirements for all lighting systems

Consumer market allow only LED products in Risk Group 1

LEDs in Risk Groups ≥ 2 restrict to professional use only

Prevent direct viewing of naked LED beams at distance < X m

Avoid using cold white and blue light in places frequented by children

Health aspects

ssl.iea-4e.org

How do we guarantee fundamental laboratory

competence in testing SSL?

Everyone is still waiting for international

methods of measurement to be published.

Currently, there is no program of International

Round Robins for SSL and only NIST (USA)

offers SSL Proficiency Testing.

Task 2: SSL Testing

ssl.iea-4e.org

Harmonize testing protocols (CIE, IEC, ANSI, etc.), suggest improvement

Round Robin #1 will cross-calibrate 4 Nucleus laboratories

Round Robin #2 will verify proficiency of participating laboratories

Design RR2 in accordance with ISO 17043 (round robin/proficiency testing procedure) so accreditation bodies can use it when evaluating a laboratory for accreditation

Task 2: SSL Testing

ssl.iea-4e.org

NIST (USA)

NLTC (China)

VSL (NL)

Asia 1

AIST (Japan) Asia 2 USA

Europe

Task 2: Round Robin 1:

Calibrating Nucleus labs

ssl.iea-4e.org

NIST (USA)

NLTC (China)

VSL (NL)

Asia 1

AIST (Japan) Asia 2 USA

Europe

Task 2: Round Robin 2:

Calibrating SSL labs

ssl.iea-4e.org

!

!

!!!!

"##$%$&' (!")&%(*$%+)!"' , -. /&!"01$23 &' (!4' (&*' +($5' +)!" ' &*67!86&' %7!

! ""#$%&' () ) *%) +,-. () /0/#%*-12/-"1%3454(345&%!!67 89 : %67 ; <9%=' ) =%>5%!*0? @A%A#"/%BC%9<) =%D8 ) ! E%F+G%6+H". %6+B-"%=#A/-"1%0/%I ) *%D: #,F/EJ%! <) =%D=+KC+EJ%9*=L%D; #-M-"1E%!!9: &!)+3 2/!; &)5< !+*&!+))!)+3 2/!+=+$)+; )&!$' !(: &!. ' $(&, !>(+(&/?!/5!@AB!C!8D?!EB!F GH!!

@H 9: &!I : $)$2/!)+3 2/!$/!5' &!5#!(: &!*&3 5(&!2: 5/2: 5*!)+3 2/H!AH 9: &!J>4-KAL!)+3 2!$/!5' &!(: +(!< &!: +=&!: +, !&M2&*$&' %&!< $(: !$' !NCJ8I H!!9: &!%1**&' (!

< +=&#5*3 !: +/!)+*6&!9FOH!PH 9: &!JQE!$/!+!655, !)+3 2!; 1(!: +/!#&&, ; +%R!$' !(: &!*&, !%: +' ' &)!(5!+3 ; $&' (!)$6: (H!SH 9: &!>7)=+' $+!$/!+!I 8QAB!*&2)+%&3 &' (!)+3 2H!LH 9: &!9TJ!$/!+' !5), &*!/(7)&!OD!52&*+(&, !(1; 1)+*!; +/&, !)+3 2H!C&*7!: $6: !DD9H!EH 9: &!$' %+' , &/%&' (!$/!#5*!%53 2+*$' 6!(: &!/%+)&/!5#!(: &!)+; 5*+(5*7H!

!!!

! !!

! !@H! AH! PH! SH! EH!

I : $)$2/!" ' , 1*+J"O!UBB!>&*$&/!8@V!

O$3 3 +; )&!J"O!J+3 2!

>5J !KAL!J+3 2! JQE!EW!Q&%&//&, !

O5< ' )$6: (!

. J9Q8!J"O!Q&(*5#$(!I 8QAB!

J+3 2!O$3 3 +; )&!

F +)56&' XY!D)+//$%!

!

Specifications subject to change. ©2009 Lighting Science Group Corporation. All rights reserved.

So-L G25 LampOrdering Information

ColorFamily Product Temperature Socket

So-L G25 G25 WW Warm White E26 E26 Edison Base

CW Cool White E27 E27 Edison Base

Lighting Science Group Corporation

1227 S. Patrick Drive BLDG 2A

Satellite Beach, FL 32937

t: 877-999-5742

www.lsgc.com

Example: SOL G25 WW E27

Dimensions shown in inches (mm)

6 lamps test labs’ ability to competently test SSL

Philips lamp: measure remote phosphor products

LSI-G25 lamp: measure current waveform with large THD

CREE LR6: measure active feedback

Sylvania PAR20 : measure directional lamp

LED DC Linear replacement lamp: Measure high CCT

Incandescent standard lamp compares fundamental

laboratory photometric measurement quality

!

!

!!!!

"##$%$&' (!")&%(*$%+)!"' , -. /&!"01$23 &' (!4' (&*' +($5' +)!" ' &*67!86&' %7!




!!!

! !!


I : $)$2/!" ' , 1*+J"O!UBB!>&*$&/!8@V!

O$3 3 +; )&!J"O!J+3 2!

>5J !KAL!J+3 2! JQE!EW!Q&%&//&, !

O5< ' )$6: (!

. J9Q8!J"O!Q&(*5#$(!I 8QAB!

J+3 2!O$3 3 +; )&!

F +)56&' XY!D)+//$%!

!









t: 877-999-5742

www.lsgc.com



!

!

!!!!

"##$%$&' (!")&%(*$%+)!"' , -. /&!"01$23 &' (!4' (&*' +($5' +)!" ' &*67!86&' %7!




!!!

! !!


I : $)$2/!" ' , 1*+J"O!UBB!>&*$&/!8@V!

O$3 3 +; )&!J"O!J+3 2!

>5J !KAL!J+3 2! JQE!EW!Q&%&//&, !

O5< ' )$6: (!

. J9Q8!J"O!Q&(*5#$(!I 8QAB!

J+3 2!O$3 3 +; )&!

F +)56&' XY!D)+//$%!

!









t: 877-999-5742

www.lsgc.com



!

!

!!!!

"##$%$&' (!")&%(*$%+)!"' , -. /&!"01$23 &' (!4' (&*' +($5' +)!" ' &*67!86&' %7!




!!!

! !!


I : $)$2/!" ' , 1*+J"O!UBB!>&*$&/!8@V!

O$3 3 +; )&!J"O!J+3 2!

>5J !KAL!J+3 2! JQE!EW!Q&%&//&, !

O5< ' )$6: (!

. J9Q8!J"O!Q&(*5#$(!I 8QAB!

J+3 2!O$3 3 +; )&!

F +)56&' XY!D)+//$%!

!









t: 877-999-5742

www.lsgc.com



!

!

!!!!

"##$%$&' (!")&%(*$%+)!"' , -. /&!"01$23 &' (!4' (&*' +($5' +)!" ' &*67!86&' %7!




!!!

! !!


I : $)$2/!" ' , 1*+J"O!UBB!>&*$&/!8@V!

O$3 3 +; )&!J"O!J+3 2!

>5J !KAL!J+3 2! JQE!EW!Q&%&//&, !

O5< ' )$6: (!

. J9Q8!J"O!Q&(*5#$(!I 8QAB!

J+3 2!O$3 3 +; )&!

F +)56&' XY!D)+//$%!

!









t: 877-999-5742

www.lsgc.com



Task 2: Round Robin #1

ssl.iea-4e.org

Tests completed

Draft report prepared and awaiting review and

final approval prior to public release

Task 2: Round Robin #1

ssl.iea-4e.org

1. Required to test: 1. Light output (lm)

2. Luminous Efficacy (lm/watt)

3. CCT

4. Chromaticity and Duv

5. CRI

6. Power (W) and Power Factor

2. Optional to test depending on Lab’s equipment 1. Center Beam Luminous Intensity

2. Color Spatial Uniformity

3. Luminous Intensity Distribution

4. Lag Start Time

5. Harmonic Distortion

Task 2: RR2 Suggested Approach

ssl.iea-4e.org

RR Protocol has been approved

RR Test Method has been approved

Each nucleus lab will determine 4 different lamps for RR2 for

distribution to labs in their region

Announcement of RR2 in July (?)

Applications accepted July-Sept (?)

(non-member countries may be able to participate at additional cost)

Laboratories selected in Oct (?)

Start RR2 in October, run for 6 months

Task 2: Round Robin 2 Timeline

ssl.iea-4e.org

The IEA SSL method of measurement that we will use for RR2 will encompass all common requirements for fundamental properties that exist in regional methods of measurement in the member countries and all international standards being developed that we know of.

Successful completion of RR2 should be considered evidence of Proficiency Testing (PT) for ANY of SSL method of measurement currently being used or currently in draft.

This includes:

IES LM-79

CIE or CEN method of measurement

(yet to be published)

JIS method of measurement (if possible)

IEC PAS Method of Measurements in annexes

Task 2: Round Robin 2 Goals

ssl.iea-4e.org

If RR2 is recognized as PT, ABs will be able to

accredit laboratories per ISO 17025 for SSL testing.

We will work with ABs and other stakeholders to

recommend that successful RR2 results be accepted

as valid PTs for all of these test methods standards.

Actual acceptance of this by an AB will be a decision

by each AB.

Promotion of this will be the work of Annex Task 3.

Task 2: Round Robin 2 Goals

ssl.iea-4e.org

Approach global accreditation organizations to

determine if they will recognize Round Robin2

as valid Proficiency Testing.

Examine current structure of accreditation,

certification and identify areas of concern.

Task 3: Standards for Testing

Reliability

ssl.iea-4e.org

Testing Laboratory

Program Owner

Manufacturers

Product

Certification Body Product

Data

Certified

Data

Product Test

Data

Task 3 Labeling as a tool to

increase Consumer Confidence

Reliable testing is indispensible!

Program owner may limit the laboratories to

accredited ones.

Program owner may make an additional request.

Accreditation + α

ssl.iea-4e.org

By default, the Accreditation Body will accept PT:

Based on the specific test method against which the lab wants to be accredited. (LM79, JIS, CEN draft etc.)

If the PT is not available, AB may accredit a lab without PT. It degrades the accreditation quality, but:

The development of PT costs a lot.

AB has to develop PTs for each measurement method, and if a lab wants to be accredited to 3 similar test methods, it is a waste!

What happens if RR2 is acceptable to AB as a replacement for genuine proficiency testing?

Development of PT for each different test method is not necessary.

Laboratory only has to participate in one PT to get accredited for different testing methods.

‘one stop SSL proficiency testing program’ : Goal of Task 3

Task 3: Issues with SSL Proficiency

Testing (PT)

ssl.iea-4e.org

RR1 has established equivalence among the nucleus laboratories.

RR2 is now designed to use the most stringent parts of the existing test methods.

If a laboratory successfully passes RR2,

It can claim that it has the ability to conduct the tests under especially tight conditions.

It can show the results of the comparative study on a common artifact between RR2 method and its normal procedure to its AB to be accredited.

Task 3: Proficiency Testing

ssl.iea-4e.org

Task 3: One-stop SSL PT program

Accreditation based on

LM79 CEN draft JIS

PT based on LM79 PT based on JIS PT based on CEN draft

Accreditation based on

LM79 CEN draft JIS

PT based on RR2 testing method

VERSUS

IEA-4E-SSL Annex

4E Implementing Agreement

10 + Countries

IEA- OECD Countries

(Nils Borg, Operating Agent )

Governments

Organize phase out of low efficiency lighting products

and schemes, promote energy-efficent lighting

National / International initiatives

EN.LIGHTEN

Efficient Lighting for 25+

Developing and Emerging

Countries

UNEP - United Nations

(Gustavo Mañez Gomis

Project Manager)

Global Lighting Forum

5000 Lighting Companies

(Pdt J Deneman, sec J. Sturm)

Zhaga LED Light Sources

100+ Members

Pdt J Deneman

CIE Standards

SSL Testing protocols

Colorimetry

Health/photobiology

IEC Standards, ISO,

UL, IESNA, CEN, CS

Accredited

testing

labs >>

Marc Fontoynont, CIE Session, July 2011

Linking Initiatives

ssl.iea-4e.org

Task 1: Performance

Task 2: Testing

Task 3: Accreditation

IEA 4E

SSL Annex

National/International

Initiatives

Industry

Interest

GLF (5000 + mnfrs)

Zhaga (100+ mnfrs)

Performance Standards

Orgs: IEC, ANSI, ISO, UL

etc.

National EE Programs

SEAD/CLASP

en.lighten (UNEP)

lites.asia

APEC

Manufacturer /Third Party

Labs

Measurement Standards

Orgs: IES, CIE, ANSI/UL

etc.

National Metrology Labs National Market Surveillance Programs

National/International

Accreditation Organizations

National Market Surveillance

Programs

National Metrology Labs

Manufacturer /Third Party

Labs

Independent Accreditation

Bodies

Interest Matrix

ssl.iea-4e.org


Contact:

Nils Borg, Operating Agent

[email protected]

Mike Scholand, Program Associate

[email protected]

Thank you!




mailto:[email protected]



LED Lamps and Luminaires

Steve Coyne

Light Naturally

Regional Tropical Performance Criteria

to propose draft performance criteria and test

methods for LED lamps in the tropics

This will provide a better determination of the

performance of residential LED lighting products

under tropical climates and electrical supply

conditions experienced by the communities of

Lites.Asia member countries.

Aim

The failure to achieve the claimed

photometric and lifetime performance of an

LED lamp can be assigned to three main

categories of causes:

Poor product design &/or fabrication

Drive current higher than recommended

by LED chip manufacturer

Poor thermal management

Causes for Failure

For some products any issues of product design

and fabrication will be identified through testing

under normal operating conditions

but for other products issues may only manifest

themselves under extreme conditions

(environmental & electrical).

Detection of Failure

IEC and IESNA LED Performance Standards

appear not to satisfactorily cover the extended

operating conditions experienced by lighting

products in tropical regions.

Current LED Performance Standards

IEC LED Performance Standard

Try to utilise parts of existing Standard Test

methods

Either by

Adding a measurement to existing test condition, or

Adding additional product samples to existing test

condition

Limiting the cost of tropical performance

criteria

IEC/PAS 62612 - 2009 Self-ballasted LED-lamps for

general lighting services – Performance requirements

IEC/PAS 62717 – 2011 LED modules for general lighting

– Performance requirements

IEC/PAS 62722.2.1 – 2011 Luminaire performance –

Part 2-1: Particular requirements for LED luminaires

IEC 60529 2001 Degrees of protection provided by

enclosures (IP Code)

Review of Standards (IEC)

IES LM-79 – 2008 IES approved method for the electrical and photometric performance of solid-state lighting products

IES LM-80 – 2008 Approved method: Measuring lumen maintenance of LED light sources

IES LM-82 – 2012 IES approved method for the characterisation of LED light engines and LED lamps for electrical and photometric properties as a function of temperature

IES TM-21 – 2011 Projecting long term lumen maintenance of LED light sources

Review of Standards (IESNA)

Proposed Extreme conditions

Parameter Minimum Maximum Section reference

Ambient Temperature (C) -10 +45 3.0

Relative Humidity N/A 85% 4.0 Voltage range (Volts) (relative to rated voltage)

-30% +10% 5.0

Weathering effects 5.0 Corrosion N/A ?? 5.1 Ingress Protection N/A 51 5.2 External aggregation of particulate (ie temperature increase from sand, dust, salt)

N/A ?? 5.3

Initial light output reduction

Lamp failure to operate

Lumen maintenance reduction (ie accelerated

drop in light output over time)

Criteria to test

Need test methods which can identify effects

Initial light output reduction

Relatively short term test

Lamp failure to operate

Relatively short term test

Long term greater reduction in light output

Long term test or short term predictive test

Testing impost

Compare performance under extreme conditions

compared to standard conditions

Criteria for performance

Two methods proposed

Photometric testing to 6 000 h

Predicts L70 from first 6,000h of test data

Stabilised junction temperature test

Predicts L70 from manufacturers test results for

operating temperature of the LED chip.

IEA Tier 1, L70 ≥ 15,000 h

Energy Star, L70 ≥ 25,000 h (residential)

Propose L70 ≥ 15,000 h

Test Method

IES LM-80-08 modified.

modification: lamp operation within an environment

chamber with a maintained ambient temperature of

45C (and RH = 85% (?))

IES LM-79-08

Data analysis

IES TM-21-11

Approval

Provisional approval gained through predicted

compliance reported at:

2000 hrs testing

then retained based on

satisfactory 3000 hrs reporting, and

final approval at 6000 hrs where

L70 (@ 45Cambient) ≥ 15,000 hrs.

http://www.unionledlight.com/ewebeditor/UploadFile/201

142217859501.jpg

Junction temperature effects

http://www.ec.hc360.com/daquan2009/english/secondm

enu/UserFiles/17/079.jpg

https://encrypted-

tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRMVi1U1fY8Rl4x

CdpLMXKgJFsCf_fS_8kapqoyCXSWT0q2b7PO

Link to lamp temperature

Junction

temperature

Case

temperature

at

Temperature

Measurement

Point (TMP)

A lamp manufacturer needs to determine the

relationship between the case & junction temperature

Test method

The package(s)/module(s)/array(s) stabilised

temperature is measured in situ, at the TMP

while operating at the specified drive current in a

draft free environment at ambient temperature

of 45C

Criteria

1. The package(s)/module(s)/array(s) temperature measured in situ, at the TMP is less than or equal to the temperature(s) specified in the LM-80 test report for the corresponding drive current or higher, and is within the manufacturer’s specified operating current range.

2. The drive current measured in the fixture is less than or equal to the drive current specified in the LM80 test report at the corresponding temperature or higher.

Note: Criteria 1 & 2 are conditions set out in Energy Star SSL Luminaires v1.3

Data analysis

IES TM-21-11

Conditional Approval

L at 2000 hrs ≥ 95.4%

L at 3000 hrs ≥ 93.1%

Final Approval

L at 6000 hrs ≥ 86.7%

L70 (@ 45Cambient) ≥ 15,000 hrs

IEA Tier 1, L70 ≥ 30,000 h

Energy Star, L70 ≥ 35,000 h (commercial)

Propose L70 ≥ 30,000 h

Same 2 test options as lamps

Photometric test

Conditional Approval

L at 2000 hrs ≥ 97.7%

L at 3000 hrs ≥ 96.5%

Final Approval

L at 6000 hrs ≥ 93.1%

L70 (@ 45Cambient) ≥ 15,000 hrs

Junction temperature test

Test method

IEC/PAS 62612 2009 section 10.2.1 b) modified

modification: Operate the lamp at 10% above

the rated voltage (or top of the rated voltage

range) , switching on and off at 30 second

intervals. Repeat the cycling for one tenth of the

number equal to half of the rated lamp life in

hours.

Supply over-voltage

Approval

At the end of the test, the lamp shall operate

and remain alight for 15 minutes.

Supply over-voltage

Test method

Operate the lamp at 30% under the rated

voltage (or bottom of the rated voltage range).

Approval

The lamp shall operate and remain alight for 15

minutes.

Supply under-voltage (?)

Test method

IES LM-79-08

Criteria

The initial luminous flux shall be measured (under standard conditions)

The non-energised lamp shall be placed in an environment chamber with a maintained ambient temperature of 85C (+5C) and Relative Humidity of 85% (+5%) for 500 hours.

The 85C/85%RH@500hrs luminous flux shall be measured (under standard conditions)

Accelerated Humidity Test

Accelerated Humidity Test

Test method

IEC 60529 2001 Degrees of protection provided

by enclosures (IP Code)

Approval

IP51 or greater

Ingress Protection

Test method

Insect and dust build-up susceptibility

To be discussed

Heatsink Maintenance

Too difficult to test

AS 60355-2004: An appraisal of the problems of

accelerated testing for atmospheric corrosion

Corrosion

Efforts have been made to:

Use existing test methods where possible

Provide options on predictive or measured

performance

In Summary

Your thoughts and comments...

Current status

Kathryn Conway

United Nations Environment Programme

UNEP/GEP en.lighten initiative

GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMME

slide 74, lites.asia: June 2012

• Nearly 50 developing and emerging countries have joined

• Committed to phase out inefficient lamps by end of 2016

• UNEP invites countries in Asia to join

• Private sector partners include: National Lighting Test Center,

Osram and Philips

• Supported by Global Environment Facility’s Earth Fund

• Collaborating with other international organizations (International

Energy Agency; UNDP; UNIDO; US DOE; World Bank)

GLOBAL EFFICIENT LIGHTING CENTRE


UNEP Collaborating Centre, launched in 2011 in Beijing:

• Partnership between UNEP & National Lighting Test Center

• Accredited facility—provides lighting testing, training, advice,

quality control & capacity-building

Supports developing and emerging countries:

• Helps strengthen national or regional lighting laboratories

• Enhances quality control capabilities for lighting

• Offers guidance to improve product manufacturing

• Develops quality control tests

COUNTRY PARTNERS


Region Latin America &

Caribbean

Middle East/ North Africa;

Eastern Europe & CIS

Asia

Workshops in

2012

Chile, Central America region

(Belize, Costa Rica, El

Salvador, Guatemala,

Honduras, Nicaragua,

Panama), Uruguay

Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia Philippines

Custom

Support via

“en.lightened

Learning”

Bolivia, Dominican Republic,

Paraguay

Algeria, ECOWAS (Benin, Burkina Faso,

Cabo Verde, Cote d’Ivoire, Gambia,

Ghana, Guinee, Guinee Bisau, Mali,

Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone,

Sudan, Togolese Republic), Egypt, Iraq,

Kuwait, Lebanon, Liberia, Palestine,

Russian Federation United Arab

Emirates, Yemen

Indonesia,

Thailand,

Tonga

INTEGRATED

POLICY

APPROACH

SUSTAINED

SUCCESS


NATIONAL EFFICIENT LIGHTING STRATEGY


To develop a national efficient lighting strategy, 14 countries will follow a one-

year process starting in 2012, whereby:

• National Coordinator works with Ministries of Energy, Environment,

Finance and Industry

• National Committee forms to consider evidence and choose the most

locally-appropriate measures. Includes government, private industry and

civil society representatives

• Process begins and concludes with workshops to ensure inclusiveness and

coordination

Outputs Integrated policies ready to adopt, finance & implement.

Phase-out of inefficient lamps by end of 2016.

EN.LIGHTEN RESOURCES:

EVIDENCE FOR INFORMED POLICY

DECISIONS


en.lighten offers technical resources:

• Country Lighting Assessments (available now)

• Global Policy Map (available now)

• Efficient Lighting Toolkit (July 2012)

• “en.lightened Learning” (August 2012)

• Global Status Report (early 2013)

LIGHTING ASSESSMENTS: 150 COUNTRIES


Results show:

• 5% of global electricity consumption could be avoided through a

transition to efficient lighting annual worldwide savings >110

billion USD

• Annual electricity savings of phase-out of inefficient lighting

closing over 250 large coal-fired power plants & avoided

investment costs ~210 billion USD

• 490 Mt of CO2 savings per year = the emissions of more than 122

million mid-size cars

ENERGY SAVINGS, BY COUNTRY (%)


GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS, BY COUNTRY (%)


LIGHTING ASSESSMENTS: METHOD


• Residential, commercial/industrial & outdoor sectors

• Lamps, luminaires and controls

• Year 2010 (most recent global & country resources)

• Individual countries supplied data & reviewed results

• Can be updated anytime for most accurate estimates

Interactive forecasting model (August 2012):

• Customized scenarios can forecast electricity demand, savings

and GHG emissions reductions

• 20-year horizon will enable policy-makers to consider the impact

of various levels of MEPS

LIGHTING ASSESSMENTS: ASIA


Country/Region

Annual Cost

Savings

(million USD)

Annual Electricity

Consumption

Reduction (TWh)

Annual CO2 Emission

Reduction (Mt CO2)

World 115,313 964 493

Asia* 34,731 310 216

China 21,618 185 134

Japan 6,102 31 13

India 2,075 41 40

Republic of Korea (the) 1,054 14 7

*Countries included: Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia,

China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea (the), India, Indonesia,

Japan, Lao People's Democratic Republic (the), Malaysia, Myanmar,

Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines (the), Republic of Korea (the), Singapore,

Sri Lanka, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Viet Nam

EFFICIENT LIGHTING POLICY MAP


Readiness of countries to transition to efficient lighting in

residential sector:

• Standards

• Labels

• Supporting policies, including finance mechanisms

• Product quality control activities

• Environmentally sound management

Ratings will be regularly updated according each country’s progress

in achieving a sustainable transition to efficient lighting

EFFICIENT LIGHTING POLICY MAP


SRI LANKA


MALAYSIA

, lites.asia: June 2012

JAPAN

, lites.asia: June 2012

CHINA

EFFICIENT LIGHTING TOOLKIT


Emphasizes phase-out of incandescent lamps as first step to

capture full potential of lighting efficiency

Sections include best practices, case studies and suggestions for

policies:

• The rationale for phasing out inefficient lamps; new technologies;

vocabulary

• Integrated policy approach

• Communication campaigns to educate the public and reinforce

policy messages

Multiple formats in 5 languages: slides, pdf, e-book & topical

webinars

“EN.LIGHTENED LEARNING”


• Interactive, online resource center for countries to work remotely

with en.lighten, its partners, task forces and experts in lighting

and policy specialties

• Will offer: webinars, tutorials, calculation tools, frequently asked

questions, videos and other ways to learn how to develop and

implement lighting policies

• Learning modules based on the Efficient Lighting Toolkit and

other topics as requested

Thank you… UNEP welcomes your participation!

www.enlighten-initiative.org

Nguyen Trung Thang

ISPONRE

Phasing out Incandescent Lamps through

Lighting Market Transformation in Vietnam

Lighting Industry in Vietnam

Project: Phasing out Incandescent Lamps

through Lighting Market Transformation in

Vietnam

Prospect of Collaboration

Contents

Current Status


Lighting for various purposes and uses accounted for around

30 to 35% of total electricity consumption in Vietnam.

The total electric consumption for Lighting by sector:

Residential lighting, 46%

Commercial lighting, 35%

Industrial and outdoor, stationary lighting, 19%

The Market for Indoor Lighting


The current stock of indoor lighting lamps in Vietnam is estimated at

around 220 million. It is further estimated that of all the indoor

lighting lamps installed, 60 million are incandescent, 80 million

fluorescent tube lights (FTL), 60 million CFLs and the balance is

some other special types.

The annual sale of lighting lamps is estimated at 140 million lamps,

with 50 million incandescent, 60 million FTL, 30 million CFL. Rang

Dong in the North and Dien Quang in the South are the major

producers of indoor lighting lamps in Vietnam.

The annual sales trends show that the sales of CFLs and T8 lamps

have consistently been growing and they are replacing

incandescent and T10 lamps.

LED Technology


The LED lighting technologies for general purpose lighting are still

very new in Vietnam. Currently the LED based lighting products are

used largely for ornamental use. With growing awareness about

GHG emissions, there is a great demand for LED lighting products.

The Vietnam government, through MOIT and MOST has

commissioned a number of studies, to investigate prospective future

of LED lighting technology as replacement of other conventional

lighting technologies in Vietnam.

These studies have primly established the world and local market

demand and supply of LED lighting technologies, identified the

barriers and put forwards the recommendations on the proper LED

lighting technologies need to be transferred and applied in Vietnam.

Trend of Lighting Industry


Target by 2015: Street and alleys (street width > 2m) lighting:

100% of equipment used for lighting newly constructed streets,

public areas and advertising are energy efficient; and

Use of advanced dimming, remote control equipment and

renewable energy (solar, wind) for lighting systems is

encouraged by government.

Target by 2025: Street and alleys (street width > 2m) lighting:

100% of equipment used for public lighting are energy efficient;

30-50% of public lighting projects will use renewable (solar)

energy.

Source:

GOV’s Decision No 1874/2010/QĐ-CP on the Direction for Urban lighting Development in

Vietnam till 2025

Roadmap for energy labeling and application of MEPS


Roadmap for ESLs (CFL, FTL, electronic and electromagnetic

ballasts) energy labeling:

Voluntary energy labelling is encouraged till December 31,

2012.

Compulsory energy labelling will be enforced from January 01,

2013.

Roadmap for application of minimum energy performance:

Import and production of ESLs under minimum energy

performance will be prohibited from January 1, 2014.

Incandescent lamps with capacity higher than 60W will be

prohibited from producing, importing and circulating from

January 1, 2013. Source:

Decision No 51/2011/QD-CP promulgating the list of devices and equipment

subject to energy labeling and application of the minimum energy efficiency and

the implementation roadmap

Vietnamese Standards (TCVN) of energy performance applied for EE lighting products


TCVN 7896 : 2008 Compact Fluorescent Lamps – Energy

Efficiency

TCVN 8249 : 2009 Tubular Fluorescent Lamps – Energy Efficiency

TCVN 7897 : 2008 Electronic Ballast for fluorescent lamps – Energy

Efficiency

TCVN 8248 : 2009 Electromagnetic Ballast for fluorescent lamps –

Energy Efficiency

TCVN 8250 : 2009 High-pressure sodium vapor lamps – Energy

Efficiency

Vietnam National Laboratories for Testing and Certification of Lighting Products in EE labeling program


No Laboratory Address Products to be tested

as assigned by the MOIT

1 The laboratory of Electric

and Electronic – Technical

Center for Standards and

Quality 1 (Quatest 1)

No 8, Hoang Quoc Viet street,

Cau Giay district, Hanoi

Tel: (+84).37564632

Website: www.quatest1.com.vn

- High Efficiency Lighting Equipment

- Compact fluorescent light bulb

- Electronic ballast for fluorescent

lamp

- Electromagnetic ballast for

fluorescent lamp

- Tubular fluorescent lamp

- High pressure sodium lamp

- Street light reflector

2 The laboratory of Electric

and Electronic – Technical

Center for Standards and

Quality 3 (Quatest 3)

No 7, Street 1, Bien Hoa

1 Industrial Zone, Dong Nai

Tel: (84-61)3836212

Website: www.quatest3.com.vn

Current Policy for Lighting Industry


Law on Energy conservation and efficient use issued on 28 June

2010.

Decree 79/2009/ND-CP on the management of urban lighting.

Decree 21/2011/ND-Cp promulgated the regulation and measures

to implement the Law on Energy conservation and efficient use.

Decision No 1874/2010/QĐ-CP on the Direction for Urban lighting

Development in Vietnam till 2025.

Decision No 51/2011/QD-CP promulgating the list of devices and

equipment subject to energy labeling and application of the

minimum energy efficiency and the implementation roadmap.

Circular No 07/2012/TT-BCT defining the energy labeling for means

and equipment using energy.

Barriers of promotion of EE lighting products


Local lamp manufacturers:

Product quality is not good: short life time and low luminous efficacy.

Material quality is not under control: phosphor powder, content of

charged gas.

Lack of measurement in production line.

Quality control

Lack of testing laboratories that are acknowledged as international

laboratory in research activities, testing of parameters of lighting

products, quality certification and labeling of lighting products.

Local peoples’ awareness of ESL benefits, especially in rural area, is

inadequate.

Policies on phasing out ILs as well as encouraging ESLs are insufficient.

Project Information


through Lighting Market Transformation

Project title: Phasing out Incandescent Lamps through Lighting

Market Transformation in Vietnam.

Project executing organization:

Executing Agency: UNEP/DTIE in cooperation with the Institute

of Strategy and Policy on Natural Resources and Environment

(ISPONRE)/ MONRE.

Executing Partners: Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT),

Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) and Vietnam-

based Lamps Producers.

Duration: 48 months, from 2012 to 2015.

GEF financing: 2,940,000 USD

Co-financing: 22,212,000 USD

Project Objectives



Long-term objective: Reducing GHGs though replacing incandescent lamps

with energy saving lamps (ESLs) in Vietnam.

Short-term objectives:

Improving quality of locally produced ESLs through technical support,

transforming from ILs into ESLs in order to reduce GHGs and protect

the environment;

Strengthening and harmonizing quality and performance-based

standards and procedures in Vietnam, including compliance in

nationally and internationally traded lighting products;

Educating and enhancing national awareness in order to promote

transforming into ESLs market;

Enhancing policy and institutional system in order to support,

encourage and control the manufacture, consumption and utilization of

ESLs in the domestic market in accordance with environmental

regulations.

Project Components



Component 1: Local Lighting Industry Capacity

Enhancement Program.

Component 2: Improved QA/QC Framework.

Component 3: ESL Market Development and Consumer

Education and Awareness.

Component 4: National policy and institutional support

program towards phasing-out of ILs and promotion of ESLs.

Component 1: Local Lighting Industry Capacity Enhancement Program



Output 1.1: Market research on the current status of the ESL and IL

markets in Vietnam.

Output 1.2: Technical aids on selected ESLs production.

Output 1.3: Training courses on quality ESL production.

Output 1.4: Business transformation plans agreed for 2 to 4 ESL

products for two main manufacturers.

Output 1.5: Technical support for selected local manufacturers

towards quality ESL production at marketable cost.

Component 2: Improved QA/QC Framework



Output 2.1: Energy, environmental & quality standards for ESLs are

strengthened and harmonized in line with regional and international

best practices.

Output 2.2: A national quality inspection system for ESLs is

established.

Output 2.3: Capacity of two testing laboratories is strengthened.

Output 2.4: “Green Customs Initiative” program to reduce

import/export of ILs & low quality ESLs implemented.

Output 2.5: Capacity of civic authorities to handle and safely

dispose mercury in ESLs and to engage in recycling strengthened.

Component 3: ESL Market Development and Consumer Education and Awareness



Output 3.1: A national social marketing campaign for rural and

residential users designed and implemented.

Output 3.2: Documented results of the market study on the ESL

promotional campaign and the roadmap/ master-plan for ESL

promotion.

Output 3.3: Demonstration projects in rural areas implemented.

Output 3.4: ESL procurement plan for public sector developed.

Component 4: National Policy and Institutional support Program towards Promotion of ESLs



Output 4.1: Agreed and adopted national roadmap and a master-

plan for the phase-out of ILs and promotion of good quality ESLs.

Output 4.2: Implemented national policy for phasing out ILs.

Output 4.3: Proposed policy measures and incentives for ESL

market development and enhancement through local partners.

Some Results achieved



Management activities:

Inception workshop organized

Project Personnel recruited

Project Steering Committee and its working

regulation established

Project Management Manual approved.

Ongoing Activities in 2012



The PMO has been developing some technical activities such as:

Conducting market research on the current status of the ESL

and IL markets in Vietnam;

Preparing a plan for capacity building program to local lamp

manufacturers;

Reviewing and recommending for energy, environmental &

quality standards for ESLs in line with regional and international

best practices;

Designing a national social marketing campaign for rural and

residential users and media plan;

Providing recommendations and guideline for implementing the

roadmap of energy labeling for ESL.

Sharing information and network of experts on:

Compliance

Communicating with the consumer

Standards and labeling

Policy

Prospects of Collaboration

Switching incandescent lamp to LED is the lowest cost

abatement measure in the Global GHG Abatement Cost

Curve

THANK YOU

Contact:

- Nguyen Trung Thang, Project Director

- Address: 1116 Hoang Quoc Viet Str, Cau Giay Dist, Hanoi

- Tel: (+84) 912030361

- Email: [email protected]

China: Phase-out schedule

Phase Date/

Period

Required Action Notes

1 Nov 2011 –

Sept 2012 Grace period

2 Oct 2012 Ban import and domestic sale of tungsten

incandescent lamps for general lighting

applications of ≥100W



applications of ≥60W

4 Oct 2015 –

Sept 2016 Interim review/adjustment of policy



applications ≥15 W

The final decision on

prohibiting production

dependent on interim review

116

Phase-out Impact

Economic and Technical Potential study:

Industry turnover increases by approximately 8 billion

RMB (US$1.25 billion)

15 thousands jobs will be created

48 TWh of electricity will be saved annually

Approximately (33.6 billion RMB @ .7RMB/kWh, $5.3 billion)

48 million tons of CO2 emission will be avoided

Approximately total Swedish emissions

117

Any other business

Next meeting

Is there a desire for a another meeting?

Where/when

India – aligned with light India early October 2012

China – aligned with IEC meetings, September 2012

Outline of agreed potential projects

Pending us finding sufficient resources

118

Vietnam Meeting, June 2012

Mark Ellis

Potential Collaborative Compliance

Projects

1. Labelling Display Store Survey

Indicative interesting countries: Philippines

Pakistan

Thailand

Indonesia

India?

Outline proposal – August 2012

Methodology proposal – before next meeting (Sept 2012)

1st round of survey – Feb/March 2013?

Countries communicate results to stakeholders – April/May 2013?

Second survey – Sept/Oct 2013?

Final report – Nov/Dec 2013?

Alongside lites.asia meeting?

Timing & venue depends on decision about lites.asia meeting

If in China, can organise this year

Immediate priorites

Date

Location

Draft Agenda

Tasks

Organise invitees

Finalise speakers

Lock-in venue booking

Publish information/agenda/issue invitations

Further rounds of invitations

2. Meeting with product suppliers

Survey of training needs (now)

Liaison with UNEP “Collaborating Centre for Efficient

Lighting” (ongoing)

Follow up with individual countries (lites.asia)

Proposal for discussion at next lites.asia meeting

3. Laboratory training

Hosted on lites.asia site

Store of country specific information, e.g.

Communications to consumers

Communications to ‘professionals’

Materials on equivalence

Start immediately

Request for materials 2-3 weeks

Requires your input!

4. Library of communication materials

Fifth lites.asia workshop · ssl.iea-4e.org To provide governments with: Tools to assess the...

Documents

Transcript of Fifth lites.asia workshop · ssl.iea-4e.org To provide governments with: Tools to assess the...