FieldComm Group Technology Update...2018/12/07 · Intrinsic safety: communication with loop-power...

Pan Pacific Hotel Singapore7 December 2018

FieldComm Group Technology UpdateFieldComm Day - Singapore

Sean VincentFieldComm Group


Thank You to Event Sponsors

2


Current Technology Update


Process Industry in IIoT – FieldComm Technologies

l HART, FF, Update (EDD and FDI separate)l Future with APLl Working Group Summary

4


HART Technology Update


HART Specification Update

l HART-IP (Network Management Specification) o Security TLS, DTLS, J-PAKEo "Direct" messaging format o Profiles for Servers - Field device, I/O

l Maintenance Updates (clarifications and corrections)o Command Summary, Common Practice Command

Specificationso Block Transfer, Universal Command Specification

(Approved by WG) l Common Tables Specification

o Routine release - update Manufacturers and Device Types o Identify SI Units (Approved by WG)

l Anticipate Ballot package Q4 2018o Ballot Package to include 6 Specifications - mostly

Clarifications and Corrections

6


HART Test Specificationsl Released -

o Slave Data-Link Test Specification r4.0o Slave Common Practice Command Test Specification

r6.0

l Test Specification Improvementso Refactoring Burst-mode Testingo Separates Application Layer testing from Data-Link

timing§ " Token-Passing test only timing, arbitration§ " TDMA test only timing

o Functionally same test coverage but allocated differently

7


HART Test Specifications Update 2018l HART-IP Server Test Specifications

o Addressing, Message Framingo Support for multiple clientso Largely derived from existing test specifications.

l WirelessHART Gateway Test Specificationo Application Layer - Gateway Commandso Application Layer - Functional test (e.g., caching, device

lists)l FSK Physical Layer Test Specification

o WG action in-processl Master Token-Passing Data-Link

o Completed detailed review / investigation of testso Identified additional requirements

8


HART Test AutomationCurrent Versions-l HART Test System v3.5 (released October 2017)

o Maintenance Update + Condensed Statusl WirelessHART Test System v1.8 (released September 2017)

o Clarifications and corrections only

Next – 12/2018l Refactored Burst Mode test major impact to test automation

o Common Practice suite updated to be Data-Link agnostico Same behavior Token-Passing or TDMA (or HART-IP server)

l HART Test System v3.6o HSniffer update - Supports manual operation, improved UIo conv (new utility) - converts Hsniffer files to text. Multiple output

formatsl WirelessHART Test System v1.9

o Native HART-IP Server - eliminates need to buy commercial Gateway

9


HART Test Automation – Development 2018/2019

l HART-IP Server Test Toolo Similar to Token-Passing Data-Link Testingo Tests PDU parsing, responses, different packet types, etc.

l HART-IP I/O Systems / Gateways Test Toolo Confirms compliance to I/O system Commands, etco Need tooling to enable regression testing

l FSK PHY Test Toolo Automates FSK PHY Tests.

l Token-Passing Master Test Toolo Automatic assessment tools and poorly behaved field deviceo Need tooling to enable regression testing

l Generic Host Test Toolo Target all hosts independent of host technologyo Includes and formalizes host backward compatibility testing done

in 2007

10


FF Technology Update


Next Ballot Scopel Specifications

o Function Block AP Part 1o Function Block AP Part 2o Function Block AP Part 3

(tbd)o Transducer Block Common

Structureso Positioner Transducer

Blocko Common File formato H1 ITK Profileo H1 Communication Profileo Host Profileo Network Managemento System Management (tbd)

l Scopeo ITK 7 Profile Definitiono Host Profile D Definitiono SCP incorporationo Clarifications (ARs)

l Ballot in Q1 2019l Minimum of 2 years before

mandatory for FF products

12


FF Test Automation – ITK 6.3.1l New Features

o Updated Standardized Connection Point test cases based on ballot changes

o Updated TFB Firmwareo Automation Tool 64-bit OS Supporto Bug fixes

l Release includes a firmware update to the TFB o No charge for active maintenance holderso Must return unit to FieldComm Group for update

13


Usability Initiative – Scalable Integration

Control Integration

Asset Integration

Process Variable Integration

No EDDs RequiredPV Device Interchangeability

Unlike Device Replacement

EDDs for setup and maintenanceAutomated Like Device Replacement

Template-based Commissioning

Control in the FieldAdvanced Applications

14


Standardized Connection Points

Key enabler is distribution

network configuration using known

rules

System Engineer and Field Technician roles are de-coupled.Supports device replacement without any system interactions.

15


Simplified PV Integration Key Factsl Access fieldbus using familiar work practicesl Restricted to AI/AO MAI/MAO (and discretes)l Standard scaling and linearizationl No EDD files for PV accessl Full sensor range (not just 4-20mA)l No 4-20mA loop testsl Integrated data qualityl Integrated position feedbackl Simpler host interfaces (cost, availability)l Interchangeable “unlike” device replacementl Easy 2am replacements

16


Like Device Replacement Example

No new files to install!

CommissionedManufacture: AcmeDevice Type: Pressure Device Revision: 1

Acme Pressure Rev 1

InstalledManufacture: Acme Device Type: PressureDevice Revision: 2Compatibility: 1

Automated Download

Configure Tag

Spare device is a Rev 2 ‘Like’ DeviceNew devices you purchase tomorrow are compatible with those installed today !

17


Like Device Replacement Key Factsl No new EDD files to installl No offline configuration changes requiredl Supports Automated Download

§ Set device tag with a maintenance tool and attachl Immediate access to all existing device featuresl New device features integrated as needed

18


Key Usability Improvement Use Casesl Device Replacement Improvements

§ Interchangeable device replacement without controller downloads

§ Backward compatibility for full device asset integration

§ Download automation

l Device Setup Improvements§ Basic PV access without any EDD/CFF files§ With EDDs, template-based configuration for

quicker, accurate offline configuration

19


APL – Advanced Physical Layer


The three leading vendor organizations for suppliers of process automation are cooperating on a project to promote the development of

an Advanced Physical Layer for Industrial Ethernet suitable for use in hazardous locations. A group of suppliers to the process industry are supporting the project with resources to

accelerate the development of the advanced physical layer.

Introduction

21


Other suppliers interested in supporting the project should contact the chairperson of the steering committee,

Dr. Jörg HähnicheEndress+Hauser

► ABB► Endress+Hauser► Krohne► Pepperl+Fuchs► Phoenix Contact► Rockwell Automation

► Samson

► Siemens

► Stahl► VEGA

► Yokogawa

Automation suppliers currently supporting the APL Project

22


APL for the Future

2018APL starts definition of conformance

APL Specification of conformity/tests

Products to Market2020

2021

2025

APL specification of protection methods, port profiles

IEEE 802.3cg ready

2020

2019

IEC Standardization (IS, HazLoc, EMC)

23


Current Activities to Bring an Advanced Physical Layer to Industrial Ethernet

Advanced Physical Layer will bring the benefits of industrial Ethernet to process automation and instrumentation, PLUS . . .► A converged long-distance communication network for process

automation and field instrumentation.

► Ability to locate Ethernet-based field devices in hazardous areas by virtue of being intrinsically safe.

► Two-wire using industry standard fieldbus cable with loop-powered devices.

► Increased bandwidth provided by 10 Megabit, full-duplex Ethernet communication enables productivity gains over the lifecycle of field devices.

One expectation is that an Advanced Physical Layer for Industrial Ethernet will enhance Digitization of Typical Field Devices in the Process Industry

24


Technology Overview of Advanced Physical Layer

Trunk► Installation in hazardous areas Zone 1, Class 1/Division 1► Cable length <=1000 meters► Data transmission at 10 Mbps, full duplex► Intrinsic safety: communication only► Increased safety: communication and power

<= 50 field devices @ 500 milliwatts► Topologies: Ring, Line, Star (depending on powering concept)Spur► Installation in hazardous areas Zone 0, Class 1/Division 1► Cable length <=200 meters► Data transmission at 10 Mbps, full duplex► Intrinsic safety: communication with loop-power or

communication only Installation Considerations► Trunk and Spur compatible with 2-wire, shielded fieldbus cable

according to IEC 61158 type A.► APL Ethernet Switch separately powered or trunk-cable

powered (increased safety)► Intrinsic Safety verification similar to FISCO

Supports proven trunk-and-spur topology used in fieldbus installations today

25


Compatible with proven Ethernet-based Industrial Protocol standards used today and future Ethernet standards such as Time Sensitive Networking

Technology Overview of Advanced Physical Layer

Impact► None to protocol stack

► Devices must integrate Ethernet physical layer for IEEE 802.3 standards emerging from cg Task Force and frontend circuitry for the Advanced Physical Layer

► Network architecture must use APL Ethernet switches

26


Outlook for the Future

The Advanced Physical Layer provides familiar and proven installation techniques for Zone 1, Division 2, and Zone 0, Division 1, installations . . .

. . . and all of the other benefits of Industrial Ethernet► Improved diagnostics► Easy engineering ► Less specialized training► Complementary to Namur Open Architecture and Industrie 4.0 initiatives ► Increased performance ► Easier device integration

To prepare for potential future enhancements to the Advanced Physical Layer, industry will investigate the potential to support systems that could benefit from increased bandwidth.

Create a figure that shows the automation pyramidand mark the section where APL is introduced and creates the opportunity for a second data channel (e.g. automation pyramid with APL field devices)

27


FieldComm Group Working Groups


Technical Working Group Structure

Change Control CommitteeTechnology Directors • WG Chairmen • Profibus

President & CEOTed Masters

FOUNDATION FieldbusTechnology Director

Stephen Mitschke

IntegrationTechnology Director

Achim Laubenstein

HARTTechnology Director

Wally Pratt

Legend

Staff

Volunteer

Contractor

Mixed

FOUNDATION Fieldbus Technology

WGChair:

Souichirou "Sota" Katsushima

Yokogawa

Advanced Applications

WGChair:

Marc BaretEndress + Hauser

IntegrationWG

Chair:Dan Ryan

Emerson

Cyber Security WG

Chair:Ragnar Schierholz

ABB

HART TechnologyWG

Chair:Eric Rotvold

Emerson

Physical LayerWG

Chair:Robin Pramanik

Siemens

ProjectGroups

ProjectGroups

ProjectGroups

ProjectGroups

ProjectGroups

ProjectGroups

29

Pan Pacific Hotel Singapore

7 December 2018

FieldComm Group Working Groupsl Meet face-to-face 3 times per year

l Meet via web/phone as needed

l Open to FieldComm Group member companies

l Create, Maintain, and Improve FieldComm Group

Technologies

30


FieldComm Group Working Groups - Summary

l Advanced Applicationso Encoded file format for configurations (application templates, system data

exchange)l Cyber Security

o Security Reviewl FF Technology

o SCPo ITK 7/Host Profile D

l HART Technologyo HART-IP update

l Marketingo Promotions of FieldComm Group Technologies

l Physical Layero HART Test Specification for Latest Specification Update

l Integrationo FDI HTML5o PA-DIM (Process Automation Device Information Model)o Unified Host Test Specification

31


Future Working Group Meetings32

l Working Group Meeting, Annual Meeting and End User Seminaro Singaporeo December 3 – 7 2018

l North America Working Group Meetingo Denver, CO, USAo February 25 – March 1 2019

l Asia Working Group Meetingo Sapporo, Japano February June 24 – 28 2019

l Working Group Meeting and Annual Meetingo Berlin, Germanyo December 9 – 13 2019


CopyrightCopyright © 2018 FieldComm Group™

This document contains copyrighted material and may not be reproduced in any fashion without the written permission of the FieldComm Group™.

Trademark Information FieldComm Group™, FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus, HART-IP™ and FDI™ are trademarks, and HART®, WirelessHART®, ROM® and SIF® are registered trademarks of FieldComm Group, Austin, Texas, USA.

Any use of these terms hereafter in this document, or in any document referenced by this document, implies the trademark/registered trademark. All other trademarks used in this or referenced documents are trademarks of their respective companies. For more information, contact FieldComm Group at the address below.

Attention: FieldComm Group PresidentFieldComm Group9430 Research Blvd., Ste. 1-120Austin, TX 78759, USA Voice: (512) 792-2300 Fax: (512) 792-2310http://www.fieldcommgroup.org

Intellectual Property Rights The FieldComm Group (the Group) does not knowingly use or incorporate any information or data into the HART, FOUNDATION Fieldbus and FDI protocol standards, which the Group does not own or have lawful rights to use. Should the Group receive any notificationregarding the existence of any conflicting private IPR, the Group will review the disclosure and either (A) determine there is no conflict; (B) resolve the conflict with the IPR owner; or (C) modify the standard to remove the conflicting requirement. In no case does the Group encourage implementers to infringe on any individual's or organization's IPR.

33

FieldComm Group Technology Update...2018/12/07 · Intrinsic safety: communication with loop-power...

Documents

Transcript of FieldComm Group Technology Update...2018/12/07 · Intrinsic safety: communication with loop-power...