Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

45

description

Gram panchayat: Mota ka kheda and Kalaliya.

Transcript of Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Page 1: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 2: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

WHERE WERE WE?

Economy

Largely cattle raring and agricultural

Small Land Holdings (1.5 Biga Average)

Migratory youth

Mineral rich: Rampant granite mining in Mandal

Page 3: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 4: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

WHERE WERE WE?

Socio- Cultural

Conservative

Caste Rigidity

Restricted social mobility

Patriarchy

Largely uneducated population

Page 5: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 6: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 7: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

WHERE WERE WE?

Political

Caste politics

Dynastic politics

Limited interface between the state and people

Page 8: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 9: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

WHY WERE WE THERE?

As civil society agents:

To partake in the grievance redress process To raise awareness on the RTH To collectivize workers to save NREGA

As students:

To study functioning of policies For Rural Appraisal

Page 10: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 11: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

HOW DID WE DO IT?

Travelled on foot: ‘Pad Yatra’

Went house to house interacting and spreading awareness

Conducted village meetings

Rural experience as participants and observers

Conducted public hearings at the end of each yatra

Page 12: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 13: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Reflect on welfare policies aimed at rural

development in relation to the grievance redress

system.

Place specific policies in the developmental

paradigm

Apply policy analysis tools to review policy

performance and suggest future policy reforms.

Page 14: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Right to Education

Desired

Policy Target:

Making

primary

education a

fundamental

right for all

children in the

age group 6-14

Page 15: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Poor infrastructure

Extremely high student-teacher ratio

Non implementation of prescribed standards in

midday meal

Socio-cultural obstacles e.g. child marriage

Page 16: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

KUNWAR KA BADIA DUNGELA

Page 17: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Universal, rights-based legislation essential for

development of human-capital

Page 18: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Appropriate management of resources

Take in account other socio-economic-cultural

problems to be able to comprehensively address the

issue

Page 19: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Desired Policy Target:

To provide public financial assistance to women

above 55 years of age and men above 58 years

of age within the economic capacity of the

state.

Page 20: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Several leakages observed

Integrated auto upgrading non-existent

Required to produce too many documents

Long, tedious and expensive process

Page 21: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Case study of

Meera Devi:

PPO/Bank receipt

was asked along

with a new

application.

Page 22: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

The only universal scheme with the potential to

support the elderly.

Page 23: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Need to emphasize on oral modes of

communication as opposed to written

Need to increase awareness on entitlements

Page 24: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Desired Policy Target:

Providing financial assistance for the

construction of dwelling units for households

under the Central BPL

Page 25: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Assistance given in stages

Money provided is not sufficient

Long waiting list

Skewed eligibility criteria

Page 26: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 27: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 28: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Targeting leads to marginalisation of the

deserving people due to rigid eligibility

criteria

Page 29: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

MGNREGA

Desired Policy

Target:

Poorest

marginalized

households with no

alternative means of

employment.

Page 30: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Engaged women and old-people

Minimal amount trickling down to the poorest

No asset creation

People rarely finish 100 days of work

Mixed response to its dilution (case study)

Page 31: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 32: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Mandal Raipur

• Dependent on cattle-rearing/agriculture

• Migration – limited to few women and old people

• Problems in implementation

• Dependent entirely on manual labour, no land holdings

• Popular among men, women and the aged

• Relatively better implementation but no alternative anyway

Page 33: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Crucial rights-based legislation for people with no

alternative means of employment

Effective distributive policy that empowers villages

with a significant influx of funds

Empowerment tool

Page 34: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Dilutes difference between the policy and it’s implementation – conspicuous absence of awareness

Building a comprehensive policy that does not address issues in isolation but integrates them. For example: building houses under NREGA, instead of separate housing and employment schemes

Page 35: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Desired Policy Target:

Development in rural India seen largely from the lens

of infrastructure development

Provision of basic infrastructural facilities to all

people residing in rural India

Page 36: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

NREGA: no asset creation

Absence of Electricity

Absence of gravel roads

Lack of Sanitation and clean drinking water

Page 37: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 38: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 39: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 40: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Intends to universalize basic infrastructure amenities

that are crucial to improvement of human life.

Page 41: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Inflexible policies tend to exclude vast numbers of

population from acquiring basic facilities. Ex. 1 hand

pump per 250 people

Does not universalize basic amenities

Page 42: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

A NON-

FUNCTIONING

HAND PUMP IN

JENA VILLAGE

IN MOTA KA

KHEDA

PANCHAYAT. THE

ONLY HAND

PUMP IN THE

ENTIRE

VILLAGE.

Page 43: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.
Page 44: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.

Grievance redress only the first step to effective policy implementation!

Page 45: Field work on policy : Rural challenge.