Female Male Prefer not to tell - ACM SIGCHI - Special Interest … · 2017-01-20 · 46.81% 88...
Transcript of Female Male Prefer not to tell - ACM SIGCHI - Special Interest … · 2017-01-20 · 46.81% 88...
46.81% 88
51.60% 97
1.60% 3
Q1 I am aAnswered: 188 Skipped: 0
Total 188
Female
Male
Prefer not totell
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
Female
Male
Prefer not to tell
1 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
43.78% 81
1.08% 2
11.35% 21
43.78% 81
Q2 I am a:Answered: 185 Skipped: 3
Total 185
Student
Practicioner
Industryresearcher
Academicresearcher
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
Student
Practicioner
Industry researcher
Academic researcher
2 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
48.09% 88
51.91% 95
Q4 I consider CSCW to be my primaryconference home:
Answered: 183 Skipped: 5
Total 183
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
Yes
No
3 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
72.45% 71
55.10% 54
20.41% 20
35.71% 35
38.78% 38
23.47% 23
26.53% 26
21.43% 21
19.39% 19
Q5 In addition to CSCW’14, I have attended(check all that apply):
Answered: 98 Skipped: 90
Total Respondents: 98
CSCW 2013 (SanAntonio, TX)
CSCW 2012(Bellevue, WA)
CSCW 2011(Hangzhou,...
CSCW 2010(Savannah, GA)
CSCW 2008 (SanDiego, CA)
CSCW 2006(Banff, Canada)
CSCW 2004(Chicago, IL)
CSCW 2002 (NewOrleans, LA)
CSCW 2000(Philadelphi...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
CSCW 2013 (San Antonio, TX)
CSCW 2012 (Bellevue, WA)
CSCW 2011 (Hangzhou, China)
CSCW 2010 (Savannah, GA)
CSCW 2008 (San Diego, CA)
CSCW 2006 (Banff, Canada)
CSCW 2004 (Chicago, IL)
CSCW 2002 (New Orleans, LA)
CSCW 2000 (Philadelphia, PA)
4 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
81.99% 132
33.54% 54
16.15% 26
3.11% 5
10.56% 17
13.04% 21
15.53% 25
29.81% 48
17.39% 28
5.59% 9
Q6 Other conferences I typically attend orsubmit to (check all that apply):
Answered: 161 Skipped: 27
Total Respondents: 161
CHI
GROUP
ECSCW
CTS
UIST
Ubicomp
DIS
iConference
ICWSM
ICIS
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
CHI
GROUP
ECSCW
CTS
UIST
Ubicomp
DIS
iConference
ICWSM
ICIS
5 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
73.53% 125
89.41% 152
36.47% 62
38.82% 66
12.94% 22
Q7 I saw the following CSCW’14 publicityitems (check all that apply):
Answered: 170 Skipped: 18
Total Respondents: 170
Web site
Facebook group
Twitter stream
Fliersdistributed ...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
Web site
Facebook group
Twitter stream
Fliers distributed at affiliated conferences
6 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
71.34% 117
33.54% 55
20.12% 33
14.63% 24
5.49% 9
9.15% 15
9.15% 15
4.88% 8
26.83% 44
1.22% 2
13.41% 22
7.93% 13
Q8 The following role(s) best describe myparticipation at CSCW’13 (check all that
apply):Answered: 164 Skipped: 24
Total Respondents: 164
Attendee
Presenter:Paper
Presenter:Poster / Dem...
Non-presentingco-author (a...
Panelist
Session Chair
StudentVolunteer
DoctoralColloquium...
WorkshopParticipant ...
Sponsor
CommitteeMember – CSC...
CommitteeMember – CSC...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
Attendee
Presenter: Paper
Presenter: Poster / Demo / Video
Non-presenting co-author (any category)
Panelist
Session Chair
Student Volunteer
Doctoral Colloquium Participant / Mentor
Workshop Participant / Organizer
Sponsor
Committee Member – CSCW 2014
Committee Member – CSCW 2015
7 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
36.93% 65
52.84% 93
10.23% 18
Q9 The majority of my CSCW’14 costs werepaid by:
Answered: 176 Skipped: 12
Total 176
A grant /fellowship /...
My company /university
Myself
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
A grant / fellowship / scholarship
My company / university
Myself
8 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
27.75% 48
19.65% 34
0.58% 1
28.90% 50
23.12% 40
Q10 For me to receive funding / support toattend CSCW conferences:
Answered: 173 Skipped: 15
Total 173
I must have acontribution...
I mustparticipate ...
I must beinvolved in...
I must receiveapproval of ...
I managefunding...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
I must have a contribution that is published in the ACM Digital Library
I must participate in a way that is listed in the proceedings, but need not be published in the ACM Digital Library
I must be involved in some organizational role
I must receive approval of my management / professor / organization
I manage funding decisions on my own
9 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
96.81% 91
35.11% 33
17.02% 16
19.15% 18
Q11 I stayed at the Marriott Waterfrontconference hotel because (check all that
apply):Answered: 94 Skipped: 94
Total Respondents: 94
It wasconveniently...
It helpedsupport the...
It offeredattractive...
It was costeffective...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Answer Choices Responses
It was conveniently located
It helped support the conference
It offered attractive perks (e.g., free wifi, ...)
It was cost effective compared with other lodging options
10 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
Q13 Please rate the following statementsalong the following scale:
Answered: 176 Skipped: 12
3.51%6
39.77%68
20.47%35
29.82%51
6.43%11 171 3.04
16.37%28
59.06%101
13.45%23
9.36%16
1.75%3 171 3.79
22.54%39
56.65%98
14.45%25
6.36%11
0.00%0 173 3.95
38.51%67
51.72%90
8.05%14
1.15%2
0.57%1 174 4.26
50.00%86
37.79%65
8.72%15
3.49%6
0.00%0 172 4.34
36.57%64
56.00%98
6.86%12
0.57%1
0.00%0 175 4.29
16.18%28
30.64%53
38.15%66
12.14%21
2.89%5 173 3.45
12.50%22
45.45%80
25.57%45
11.93%21
4.55%8 176 3.49
On average,6-7 parallel...
On average,there was th...
Having talkslots of equ...
The 9:00 dailystart time w...
The two-hourlunch break ...
A half-hourwas an...
The LastingImpact Award...
The annualtiming of th...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
StronglyAgree
Agree Neutral Disagree StronglyDisagree
Total WeightedAverage
On average, 6-7 parallel sessions was a good number
On average, there was the right amount of time for Q&A forpapers
Having talk slots of equal length for all papers was appropriate
The 9:00 daily start time was good.
The two-hour lunch break was useful.
A half-hour was an appropriate length for coffee breaks
The Lasting Impact Award should be a plenary session (nocompeting tracks)
The annual timing of the conference (mid-winter) works well forme.
11 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
Q15 Please rate the following conferencesessions along the following scale:
Answered: 175 Skipped: 13
11.49%20
36.21%63
16.09%28
9.20%16
6.90%12
20.11%35 174 2.76
4.68%8
18.13%31
11.11%19
2.92%5
3.51%6
59.65%102 171 1.39
5.23%9
23.26%40
16.86%29
13.37%23
5.81%10
35.47%61 172 2.02
24.86%43
61.85%107
9.83%17
1.16%2
0.00%0
2.31%4 173 4.03
10.59%18
31.76%54
12.35%21
4.12%7
1.18%2
40.00%68 170 2.26
2.91%5
16.28%28
9.30%16
2.33%4
1.16%2
68.02%117 172 1.13
5.92%10
24.85%42
14.79%25
4.14%7
1.18%2
49.11%83 169 1.83
2.99%5
2.40%4
4.19%7
0.00%0
0.00%0
90.42%151 167 0.37
11.90%20
47.62%80
10.12%17
4.17%7
1.19%2
25.00%42 168 2.90
16.86%29
55.81%96
11.05%19
2.33%4
0.00%0
13.95%24 172 3.45
OpeningPlenary (Mar...
ClosingPlenary...
Lasting ImpactAward (Jonat...
Paper sessions(overall)
Panels(overall)
CSCWhat’s Next
CSCW Town Hall
DoctoralColloquium
Posters,demos, and...
Posters
Demos
Videos
Mid-day breaks
Welcomereception...
Thematic grouplunches...
InteractivityReception...
FacebookReception...
Conferencereception...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Excellent Good Neutral Fair Poor Didn’t attend Total Weighted Average
Opening Plenary (Mary Flanagan)
Closing Plenary (Patrick Meier)
Lasting Impact Award (Jonathan Grudin)
Paper sessions (overall)
Panels (overall)
CSCWhat’s Next
CSCW Town Hall
Doctoral Colloquium
Posters, demos, and videos short talks
Posters
12 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
7.60%13
37.43%64
11.11%19
3.51%6
1.17%2
39.18%67 171 2.29
4.17%7
22.02%37
9.52%16
1.79%3
0.60%1
61.90%104 168 1.42
24.40%41
52.98%89
16.07%27
1.19%2
0.60%1
4.76%8 168 3.85
28.90%50
27.17%47
2.89%5
0.00%0
0.00%0
41.04%71 173 2.62
25.86%45
13.22%23
4.60%8
0.57%1
1.15%2
54.60%95 174 1.98
23.84%41
43.02%74
4.65%8
0.00%0
0.58%1
27.91%48 172 3.06
29.89%52
27.01%47
7.47%13
0.00%0
3.45%6
32.18%56 174 2.83
46.82%81
27.75%48
7.51%13
2.31%4
1.73%3
13.87%24 173 3.74
Demos
Videos
Mid-day breaks
Welcome reception (Sunday)
Thematic group lunches (Monday)
Interactivity Reception (Monday)
Facebook Reception (Monday)
Conference reception (Tuesday)
13 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
Q16 Please rate the following workshopsalong the following scale:
Answered: 160 Skipped: 28
2.61%4
3.92%6
1.31%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
92.16%141 153 0.33
0.66%1
2.63%4
1.32%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
95.39%145 152 0.18
1.97%3
0.00%0
1.32%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
96.71%147 152 0.14
2.67%4
1.33%2
1.33%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
94.67%142 150 0.23
1.96%3
1.31%2
1.31%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
95.42%146 153 0.19
1.97%3
1.97%3
1.32%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
94.74%144 152 0.22
2.63%4
1.32%2
1.32%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
94.74%144 152 0.22
0.65%1
1.31%2
1.31%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
96.73%148 153 0.12
0.65%1
1.31%2
1.31%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
96.73%148 153 0.12
2.63%4
1.32%2
0.66%1
0.00%0
0.00%0
95.39%145 152 0.20
3.29%5
1.32%2
1.32%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
94.08%143 152 0.26
2.61%4
2.61%4
1.31%2
0.00%0
0.00%0
93.46%143 153 0.27
Workshop 1:Sharing, Re-...
Workshop 2:Structures f...
Workshop 3:Designing wi...
Workshop 4:Cross-Cultur...
Workshop 5:Designing...
Workshop 6:Back to the...
Workshop 7:Co-creating ...
Workshop 9:The Fourteen...
Workshop 10:Collaboratio...
Workshop 11:Global Softw...
Workshop 12:Feminism and...
Workshop 14:OCData...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Excellent Good Neutral Fair Poor Didn’tattend
Total WeightedAverage
Workshop 1: Sharing, Re-use and Circulation of Resources inCooperative Scientific Work
Workshop 2: Structures for Knowledge Co-creation BetweenOrganisations and the Public
Workshop 3: Designing with Users for Domestic Environments
Workshop 4: Cross-Cultural Studies of Collaborative Systems
Workshop 5: Designing Futures for Peer-to-Peer Learning @ CSCW
Workshop 6: Back to the Future of Organizational Work: Crowdsourcingand Digital Work Marketplaces
Workshop 7: Co-creating & Identity-making in CSCW: Revisiting Ethicsin Design Research
Workshop 9: The Fourteenth International Workshop on CollaborativeEditing Systems
Workshop 10: Collaboration and Coordination in the Context of InformalCare (CCCiC 2014)
Workshop 11: Global Software Development in a CSCW Perspective
Workshop 12: Feminism and Social Media Research
Workshop 14: OCData Hackathon: Online Communities DataHackathon
14 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
Q18 Consider the following potentialinnovations for CSCW’15. Rate them along
the following five-point scale:Answered: 171 Skipped: 17
4.17%7
11.31%19
19.64%33
26.79%45
38.10%64 168 2.17
51.18%87
34.71%59
13.53%23
0.59%1
0.00%0 170 4.36
34.12%58
39.41%67
24.12%41
2.35%4
0.00%0 170 4.05
8.59%14
20.25%33
61.96%101
8.59%14
0.61%1 163 3.28
25.00%42
33.33%56
39.88%67
1.79%3
0.00%0 168 3.82
13.94%23
21.82%36
53.33%88
9.70%16
1.21%2 165 3.38
15.98%27
20.71%35
21.89%37
26.04%44
15.38%26 169 2.96
22.02%37
23.21%39
23.81%40
21.43%36
9.52%16 168 3.27
Require30-second vi...
Have papersopenly...
Thematicdinner group...
Reinstitutethe Open Spa...
Continue TownHall meeting
Reinstitutemorning fitn...
Stoppublishing...
Stop includingconference s...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
StronglyAgree
Agree Neutral Disagree StronglyDisagree
Total WeightedAverage
Require 30-second video abstracts for all papers (e.g., CHI 2014)
Have papers openly available to anyone in the world on the ACM DL from2 weeks before until 2 weeks after CSCW
Thematic dinner groups for newcomers
Reinstitute the Open Space unconference/hack space track
Continue Town Hall meeting
Reinstitute morning fitness activities
Stop publishing proceedings on USB memory sticks
Stop including conference swag (e.g., bags, trinkets)
15 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
Q23 Please answer these questions abouthow likely you are to attend CSCW:
Answered: 171 Skipped: 17
42.35%72
31.76%54
21.76%37
2.94%5
1.18%2 170 4.11
41.18%70
31.18%53
21.76%37
4.12%7
1.76%3 170 4.06
17.86%30
20.24%34
41.07%69
11.31%19
9.52%16 168 3.26
CSCW 2015(Vancouver)
CSCW 2016 (SanFrancisco Ba...
CSCW 2017(Tentatively...
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Very likely Likely Unsure Unlikely Very Unlikely Total Weighted Average
CSCW 2015 (Vancouver)
CSCW 2016 (San Francisco Bay Area)
CSCW 2017 (Tentatively, Brazil)
16 / 18
CSCW 2014 Survey
Country Percent Number Austria 1,14% 2 Belgium 1,14% 2 Brazil 0,57% 1 Canada 4,55% 8 China 0,57% 1 Denmark 2,27% 4 France 1,14% 2 Germany 5,68% 10 India 1,14% 2 Ireland 0,57% 1 Israel 0,57% 1 Japan 1,70% 3 Korea, South 2,27% 4 Netherlands 0,57% 1 Qatar 0,57% 1 Singapore 0,57% 1 Sweden 0,57% 1 Switzerland 0,57% 1 Taiwan 0,57% 1 United Arab Emirates 0,57% 1 United Kingdom 4,55% 8 United States of America 68,18% 120
TOTAL 176
0,00%10,00%20,00%30,00%40,00%50,00%60,00%70,00%80,00%
Country
Country
Q3 My work location is (for USA please alsogive state):
Answered: 186 Skipped: 2
CSCW 2014 Survey
17 / 18
State (for US only)
Country Percent Number California 12,70% 16 District of Columbia 0,79% 1 Florida 0,79% 1 Georgia 5,56% 7 Illinois 6,35% 8 Indiana 1,59% 2 Maryland 12,70% 16 Massachusetts 4,76% 6 Michigan 6,35% 8 Minnesota 3,17% 4 New Jersey 7,14% 9 New Mexico 0,79% 1 New York 10,32% 13 North Carolina 0,79% 1 Ohio 0,79% 1 Pennsylvania 15,87% 20 Texas 1,59% 2 Utah 0,79% 1 Virginia 2,38% 3 Washington 3,97% 5 Wisconsin 0,79% 1
TOTAL 126
0,00%2,00%4,00%6,00%8,00%
10,00%12,00%14,00%16,00%18,00%
State (US)
Country
CSCW 2014 Survey
18 / 18