FEMA Update Partners in Emergency Preparedness Conference April 14, 2009 Federal Preparedness...
-
date post
15-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of FEMA Update Partners in Emergency Preparedness Conference April 14, 2009 Federal Preparedness...
FEMA Update
Partners in Emergency Preparedness Conference
April 14, 2009
Federal Preparedness CoordinatorPatrick Massey
Director, National Preparedness DivisionFEMA Region 10
Updates on various FEMA Preparedness and other Agency programs and initiatives
Presentation Topics
• Assessments
• Planning
• NIMS
• Training
• Exercises
• Continuity Programs
• Community Preparedness
I. Overview of FEMA Nationally
II. Overview of FEMA Region 10
III. Preparedness
IV. Hazard Mitigation
V. Grants Programs
VI. Disaster Operations
VII. Disaster Assistance
I. Overview of FEMA
Prepared. Responsive. Committed.
Lead Nation’s Efforts to:–Prepare for,–Protect against,–Rapidly respond to, and–Recover from disaster.–Mitigate risk.
All Hazards:–Natural disasters–Terrorism–Other man-made disasters
FEMA Mission
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Office of the AdministratorActing Administrator– Nancy Ward
Acting Deputy Administrator – David Garratt
Office of the AdministratorActing Administrator– Nancy Ward
Acting Deputy Administrator – David Garratt
Disaster Operations
Assistant Administrator
Bob PowersActing
Disaster Operations
Assistant Administrator
Bob PowersActing
Office of Policy and Prog. Analysis
DirectorPat Stahlschmidt
Acting
Office of Policy and Prog. Analysis
DirectorPat Stahlschmidt
Acting
Office of External Affairs
Director Robert Jensen
Acting
Office of External Affairs
Director Robert Jensen
Acting
Executive SecretariatExec. SecretaryElizabeth Edge
Executive SecretariatExec. SecretaryElizabeth Edge
National ContinuityPrograms
Assistant Administrator
Ann BuckinghamActing
National ContinuityPrograms
Assistant Administrator
Ann BuckinghamActing
Mitigation Assistant
Administrator Mike Buckley
Acting
Mitigation Assistant
Administrator Mike Buckley
Acting
Disaster Assistance
Assistant AdministratorJames Walke
Acting
Disaster Assistance
Assistant AdministratorJames Walke
Acting
LogisticsManagement
Assistant Administrator William “Eric”
Smith
LogisticsManagement
Assistant Administrator William “Eric”
Smith
Dotted Lines are Coordination Solid Lines Are Command and Control
Names in Italics are in Acting positions
As of 1/21/09
Associate Deputy Administrator
Bob Shea
Associate Deputy Administrator
Bob Shea
Law Enforcement Advisor to the Administrator
Rick Dinse
Law Enforcement Advisor to the Administrator
Rick Dinse
Grant ProgramsAssistant
AdministratorRoss Ashley
Grant ProgramsAssistant
AdministratorRoss Ashley
National Preparedness
Deputy Administrator Corey Gruber
Acting
National Preparedness
Deputy Administrator Corey Gruber
Acting
United States Fire Admin
Assistant Administrator Denis Onieal
Acting
United States Fire Admin
Assistant Administrator Denis Onieal
Acting
Regional AdministratorsRegion I - Paul Ford, ActingRegion II - Mike Moriarty, ActingRegion III – Jon SarubbiRegion IV - Major P. MayRegion V - Janet Odeshoo, Acting Region VI – Gary Jones, Acting Region VII – Art Freeman, ActingRegion VIII –Doug Gore, ActingRegion IX – Karen Armes, ActingRegion X – Denis Hunsinger, Acting
Regional AdministratorsRegion I - Paul Ford, ActingRegion II - Mike Moriarty, ActingRegion III – Jon SarubbiRegion IV - Major P. MayRegion V - Janet Odeshoo, Acting Region VI – Gary Jones, Acting Region VII – Art Freeman, ActingRegion VIII –Doug Gore, ActingRegion IX – Karen Armes, ActingRegion X – Denis Hunsinger, Acting
Gulf Coast RecoveryAssistant Administrator
James Stark
Gulf Coast RecoveryAssistant Administrator
James Stark
Office of Equal RightsDirector
Pauline Campbell
Office of Equal RightsDirector
Pauline Campbell
Office of Chief Financial Officer
Norman Dong
Office of Chief Financial Officer
Norman Dong
ManagementAssistant
AdministratorAlbert Sligh
ManagementAssistant
AdministratorAlbert Sligh
Office of Chief Counsel
David Trissell
Office of Chief Counsel
David Trissell
National Capital Region Coordination
Director Ken Wall
Acting
National Capital Region Coordination
Director Ken Wall
Acting
Disability Coordinator
Cindy Daniel
Disability Coordinator
Cindy Daniel
Center for Faith-Based and
Community Initiatives
DirectorCarole Cameron
Acting
Center for Faith-Based and
Community Initiatives
DirectorCarole Cameron
Acting
3,000 authorized full-time permanent employees
8,000 on-call disaster assistance employees
Who is FEMA?
New FEMA Vision
TRANSFORM FEMA INTO THE NATION’S PREEMINENT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND PREPAREDNEDSS AGENCY
▪ Marshall an effective national response
▪ Improve delivery of service to victims
▪ Reduce vulnerability to life and property
▪ Strengthen our partnerships with states
▪ Earn public confidence
Operational Core Competencies
• Service to Disaster Victims • Operational Planning and Preparedness • Incident Management• Disaster Logistics • Hazard Mitigation • Emergency Communications • Public Disaster Communications • Integrated Preparedness • Continuity Programs
II. FEMA Region 10
Office located in Bothell, WA - “The Bunker”
Dennis Hunsinger, Acting Regional Administrator
• 90 Full-time staff
• 400+ Disaster Reservists
• MERS detachment co-located
Satellite offices: Hermiston, OR Anchorage, AK
FEMA Region 10 FY09 Goals
1. Disaster Readiness
2. Program Delivery
3. Stakeholder Outreach
4. Professional Development
III. Preparedness
• Assessments
• Planning
• NIMS
• Training
• Exercises
• Community Preparedness
• Continuity Programs
Goal: Implement the Preparedness CycleGoal: Implement the Preparedness Cycle
CONPLAN, OPLANS
Internal, External, T&E Integration
HSEEP, NEP, NIECG
RAMP, CAP NIMS / NRF
Doctrine development:
• Preparedness – National Preparedness Goal (NPG) and Target Capabilities (TCL)
• Exercises – National Exercise Program (NEP)
• Incident Management – National Incident Management System (NIMS)
• Planning – Integrated Planning System (IPS) and Comprehensive Preparedness Guides (CPG)
Assessments
• Target Capabilities List (TCL) Update Project
• Gap Analysis Program (GAP)
• Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS)
CommunicationsCommunity Preparedness and ParticipationIntelligence/Information Sharing and DisseminationPlanningRisk Management
CBRNE DetectionCounter-Terror Investigations and Law EnforcementInformation Gathering and RecognitionIntelligence Analysis and Production
Critical Infrastructure ProtectionEpidemiological Surveillance and InvestigationFood and Agriculture Safety and DefenseLaboratory Testing
Economic and Community RecoveryRestoration of LifelinesStructural Damage Assessment
Common Mission Area
Prevent Mission Area
Recovery Mission Area
Protect Mission Area
Animal Health Emergency SupportCitizen Evacuation and Shelter-in-PlaceCritical Resource Logistics and DistributionEmergency Operations Center ManagementEmergency Public Information and WarningEmergency Public Safety and Security ResponseEmergency Triage and Pre-Hospital TreatmentEnvironmental HealthExplosive Device Response OperationsFatality ManagementFire Incident Response SupportIsolation and QuarantineMass Care (Sheltering, Feeding, and Related Services)Mass ProphylaxisMedical Supplies Management and DistributionMedical SurgeOnsite Incident ManagementResponder Safety and HealthSearch and Rescue (Land-Based)Volunteer Management and DonationsWMD/Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination
Respond Mission Area
The Target Capabilities List (TCLs)
TCL Update Project
• Update content to reflect current policies, guidance, capabilities• Establish ‘frameworks’ that are more user-friendly, especially for TCL
application to preparedness decision making• Strengthen the role of a jurisdiction’s unique risks and circumstances • Establish measurable targets for planning and assessment purposes• Provide an objective means to justify investments and priorities• Provide strong links among applicable standards, Federal policies
and guidance, and terminologies• Help synchronize administrative and programmatic reporting• Promote mutual aid and resource sharing• Promote integration across programs along the preparedness
lifecycle
Impacts from the TCL Update
• Individual capabilities will be implemented on a rolling basis as they are developed until the entire TCL is updated
• TCL updates will be reflected or referenced within federal preparedness programs (e.g., grant investment justifications, planning guidance, exercise evaluation guides, assessments)
• The TCL provides guidance for building and measuring capabilities, it is not meant to prescribe how to perform operations or to be viewed as a standard
• Entities are not expected to deliver a capability by itself – rather it is anticipated for capabilities to be met through mutual aid and regional collaboration.
Updated Frameworks Under Development
From the original 37 capabilities, the following six (6) are under development to test the means for updating the TCL:
• Animal Disease Emergencies
• Multi-Agency Coordination/Emergency Operations Center Management
• Intelligence
• Mass Transit Protection
• Incident Command
• Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)/Hazardous Materials (HazMat) Rescue
FEMA convened Technical Working Groups comprised of local officials from all Regions of the country to develop the first set of draft Frameworks being circulated for a wider national review
Target Capability Frameworks
A Target Capability Framework comprises three charts: Performance Classes, Performance Objectives, and Resource Elements
Performance Classes: Examples
Risk Factors Class I Class IV
Yearly Sales Value of Livestock, Poultry, and their Products
States with yearly sales of livestock, poultry, and their products of greater than $5 billion.
Counties and tribes with yearly sales of livestock, poultry, and their products of greater than $50 million.
Animal Population Density
States with greater than X concentrated feeding operations
Counties and tribes with greater than X concentrated feeding operations
WMD/HazMat Rescue
Risk Factors Class I Class IV
Population Cities and Counties with population greater than 3 million
Cities / Counties with population between 100,000 and 500,000
Population Density Cities / Counties with population less than 100,000 and density greater than 2,500 people per square mile
Critical Infrastructure Chemical
Animal Disease Emergencies
The purpose of the FEMA Gap Analysis Program is to engage State, Federal, and other partners in a process that identifies and addresses shortfalls in meeting disaster resource and planning requirements. Gaps are identified by comparing current capabilities to disaster response requirements.
Gap Analysis Program (GAP)
1. Transportation and Evacuation
2. Communications
3. Temporary Emergency Power
4. Mass-Care and Emergency Assistance
5. Logistics Management and Resource Support
6. Public Health
7. Search and Rescue
GAP Critical Areas:
Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS)
“A Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS) that assesses, on an ongoing basis, the Nation’s overall preparedness, including operational readiness.”
– PKEMRA 649(a)
Analysis and information that:
Informs the Federal Preparedness Report (FPR), State Preparedness Reports (SPR), and, ultimately, National Preparedness Report (NPR)
Helps set policy requirements and allocate finite resources
Supports the Grant Programs Directorate (GPD) Cost-to-Capability (C2C) Initiative
Guides improvements in training, exercises and operations
Assess compliance with the national preparedness system, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies (PKEMRA 649 (c)(1))
Assess capability levels at the time of assessment against target capability levels (PKEMRA 649 (c)(2))
Assess resource needs to meet desired target capability levels (PKEMRA 649 (c)(3))
Assess performance of training, exercise, and operations (PKEMRA 649 (c)(4))
OUTCOMESREQUIREMENTS
CAS
CRRNEXS
FEMA RAMP
IJs
GAP
CAP
NIMSDATA
NPS
PCA
TICP
FYHSP
BISRs
C2C
CTGP
EMAP
TEI
CSID
EMI -
TAIS
DPETAP
FPR
SPR
LLISEMAC
Training Data
Exercise Data
Grant Reporting
Data
PKEMRA Reporting
Requirements
Existing and Legacy
Assessment Data
After Action and Corrective
Action Data
Preparedness Standards Data
Aid Agreements
Data
Doctrine, organization, roles and responsibilities, response actions and planning requirements that guide national response
IncidentAnnexes
Incident-specific applications of the FrameworkIncident-specific applications of the Framework
Support Annexes
Essential supporting aspects of the Federal response common to all incidentsEssential supporting aspects of the Federal response common to all incidents
Emergency Support Function Annexes
Mechanisms to group and provide Federal resources and capabilities to support State and local responders
Mechanisms to group and provide Federal resources and capabilities to support State and local responders
Partner Guides
Next level of detail in response actions tailored to the actionable entity Next level of detail in response actions tailored to the actionable entity
24
Core Document
www.fema.gov/nrf
National Response Framework (NRF)
National Incident Management System2008
1st edition NIMS Guidance Document issued in 2004
2008 NIMS Document:
• Preparedness
• Communications and Information Management
• Resource Management
• Command and Management
• Ongoing Management and Maintence
2nd edition NIMS Guidance Document issued in 2008
Preparedness: Additional roles of elected and appointed officials to define their responsibilities prior to and during an incident Added key roles of NGOs and private sector, detailing how they should be integrated into preparedness efforts
Communications & Information Management This component was heavily revised to better articulate the importance of communications and information management and is now comprised of three main sections.
Resource Management The majority of the concept and principles within this component remained unchanged; however, clarifying language was added wherever possible to ensure readability.
National Incident Management System2008 Changes
Command and Management Clarified the purpose of Area Command and how it fits into ICS Expanded the Multiagency Coordination System (MACS) section to better define the process of Multiagency Coordination and the elements that make up the System Replaced the term MAC Entities with MAC Groups Major system elements within MACS now include Emergency Operation Centers (EOCs) and communications/dispatch centers.
Ongoing Management and Maintenance As part of the restructuring of the component, the Supporting Technologies chapter of the 2004 NIMS was moved into the Ongoing Management and Maintenance Component in the 2008 version.
National Incident Management System2008 Changes
NIMS – the path forward
• NIMS Compliance Metrics (FY09 and FY10)
• NIMS Strategy Document
• NIMS 5-year Training Plan
• ICS Position-specific Training
• ICS Emergency Responder Field Guide
• NIMS Intelligence/Investigative Function Guide
• NIMS Credentialing Guide
Planning
Comprehensive Preparedness Guides (CPGs)
Integrated Planning System (IPS)
Source: National Response Framework (NRF) p.75
National Planning ScenariosNational Planning Scenarios
Scenario Set National Planning Scenarios
Explosives Attack – Terrorist Use of Explosives (TUE)
Scenario 12: Explosives Attack – Bombing Using Improvised Explosive Device (IED)
Nuclear Attack (IND) Scenario 01: Nuclear Detonation – Improvised Nuclear Device (IND)
Radiological Attack (RDD) Scenario 11: Radiological Attack – Radiological Dispersal Devices (RDD)
Biological Attack – with annexes for different pathogens (BW)
Scenario 02: Biological Attack – Aerosol Anthrax
Scenario 04: Biological Attack – Pneumonic Plague
Scenario 13: Biological Attack – Food Contamination
Scenario 14: Biological Attack – Foreign Animal Disease (FAD)
Chemical Attack - with annexes for different agents (CW)
Scenario 05: Chemical Attack – Blister Agent
Scenario 06: Chemical Attack – Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TIC)
Scenario 07: Chemical Attack – Nerve Agent
Scenario 08: Chemical Attack – Chlorine Tank Explosion
Natural Disasters – with different annexes for different disasters
Scenario 09: Natural Disaster – Major Earthquake
Scenario 10: Natural Disaster – Major Hurricane
Cyber Attack Scenario 15: Cyber Attack
Pandemic Influenza Scenario 03: Biological Disease Outbreak – Pandemic Influenza
Implementing IPSImplementing IPS
Federal HQ CONPLANS
• DHS develops, updates, or amends the Scenarios.• Coordinates with other Federal Departments and agencies.• Focused on risked-based planning.• Updated at least biennially.
• Developed by DHS; grouped into eight categories.• Outlines strategic priorities, broad national objectives.• Describes the envisioned “end-state.”
• Developed by DHS; one for each SGS.• Defines mission, roles, authorities, and responsibilities.• Establishes mission-essential tasks.
National Planning Scenarios
Strategic Guidance Statements
Regional CONPLANS
Strategic Plans
• Developed by FEMA – ESF inputs.• Describes the process for integrating and synchronizing
existing Federal capabilities at the Regional level to accomplish NRF tasks.
• Describes how Federal capabilities will be integrated into State plans.
Exercise
Design, Development, and Coordination
• Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP)
• National Exercise Schedule (NEXS)
• Corrective Action Program (CAP)
• Lessons Learned Information Sharing (LLIS) System
• Regional Exercise Support Program (RESP)
• Northwest Interagency Exercise Coordination Group (NIECG)
• Training and Exercise Planning Workshop (T&EPW)
• Coordinate Federal exercise design and development
National Exercise Program (NEP) Region 10 Exercise Program
To establish a state-of-the art National Exercise & Simulation Center (NESC) at FEMA Headquarters to serve the Department’s all-hazards preparedness and response program through the use of a central facility that pools resources, maximizes efficiency, and provides sustained exercise and training support to all stakeholders.
Computer Modeling & Simulation
Human/SME Modeling & Simulation
Improvement Management & Exercise Eval
Exercise Design & Delivery
TEEX
SANDIA
DoD
JHU APL
DHS S&T
EPA
Private
Others
FBI
VNN
CIA
EPA
HHS/CDC
DHS
U.A.
Others
LLIs
AARs NxMSEL
LLIS
Log
CAP
RAMP
OpsPlans
NESC Core
National Exercise and Simulation Center (NESC)
Training
FEMA Disaster Workforce Task Books and credentialing
IEMC 2008
City of Spokane 11/08
Washington state 10/08
City of Bellingham 8/08
Pierce County 5/08
Federal Way 9/09
Newly released Independent Study Courses:
IS-100a: Introduction to ICS (updated)
IS-200a: Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents (updated)
IS-700a: Intro to NIMS
IS-800b: Intro to NRF
IS-801-814: ESF Training (except ESF-6)
IS-775: EOC Management and Operations
IS-102: Deployment Basics for FEMA Response Partners
IS-821: Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Support Annex
Continuity Programs
Approved by the FEMA Administrator on January 21, 2009
CGC 1 provides Continuity guidance on:
Continuity Program Management information for the States, territories, tribal, and local government jurisdictions, and private sector organizations
Elements and components of a viable continuity capability
Coordination of interdependencies
Continuity plan operational phases and implementation
Continuity “Excellence Series”“Professional Continuity Practitioner”
Continuity Excellence Series – Level I COOP Awareness Course Introduction to COOP Effective Communication COOP Manager’s T-t-T Course COOP Planner’s T-t-T Workshop Intro to Incident Command System (ICS) Principles of Emergency Management Intro to National Incident Management System (NIMS) A National Response Framework (NRF), An Introduction Exercise Development Course/Exercise Design Course/or COOP Exercise
Design/Development T-t-T Course Complete attendance in continuity exercise Determined Accord, and NARA/CoSA Vital Records Training (optional, recommended)
Continuity “Excellence Series”
“Master Continuity Practitioner”
Continuity Excellence Series – Level II Applicants must attain Continuity Excellence Series – Level I, Professional
Continuity Practitioner Exercise Evaluation and Improvement Planning Leadership and Influence Devolution Training Building Design for Homeland Security T-t-T Course for Continuity of Operations Instructional Delivery for Subject Matter Experts Instruct COOP Manager’s T-t-T Course Facilitate COOP Planner’s T-t-T Workshop, and Written Comprehensive Exam
Receive alert and warning information through as many means as possible
Integrated Public Alert and Warning Systems (IPAWS)
Community Preparedness
Volunteer programs
(i.e., Citizen Corps)
Citizen Preparedness
(i.e., Individual and Family preparedness)
2 primary components
Why is it critical to involve the Community?
Journal of Emergency Medical Services (2004); National Fire Protection Association (2003); National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (2003)
• Less than 1% of the U.S. population is an emergency responder
• In 95% of situations, victim/ bystander first to respond
Citizen Corps Partners
The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program educates and trains citizens in basic disaster response skills
Fire Corps promotes the use of citizen advocates to provide support to fire and rescue departments
The Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Program helps medical, public health, and other volunteers offer their expertise
Neighborhood Watch/USAonWatch incorporates terrorism awareness education into its existing crime prevention mission
Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS) works to enhance the capacity of state and local law enforcement to utilize volunteers
Katrina: Astrodome
Harris CountyCitizen Corps CouncilOver 60,000 volunteers helpedprocess 60,000 evacuees andshelter 30,000 at Reliant Center
FEMA Region 10: Citizen Corps
AK ID OR WA
Councils 11 11 39 62
CERT 3 27 49 62
Neighborhoods Watch 88 118 170 241
Volunteers in Police Service 12 22 43 78
Medical Reserve Corps 2 6 11 21
Fire Corps 3 6 12 29
As of April 8, 2009 www.citizencorps.gov
Citizen Corps Council Growth - nationally
0
887
1435
21032301
203
1830
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Dec31
2001
Dec31
2002
Dec31
2003
Dec31
2004
Dec31
2005
Dec31
2006
Dec31
2007
IV. Hazard Mitigation Division
Mark Carey, Director
Risk Analysis• Flood Map Modernization
• Hazard Mitigation Plans
• Risk Assessment (HAZUS)
• Earthquake program
Risk Reduction • Hazard Mitigation Plans
• Hazard Mitigation grants
• Floodplain Management compliance
• Flood InsuranceR10 HMGP - $160 million
R10 PDM - $23 million
R10 FMA - $7 million
R10 Map Mod (04-08) $30 million
V. Grants Programs Division
Richard Donovan, Director
State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSP)
Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI)
Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS)
Citizen Corps Program (CCP)
SHSP Tribal
UASI Non-profit Security Grant Program (NSGP)
Operation Stonegarden (OPSG)
Homeland Security Grant Program Infrastructure Security grants
Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP)
Port Security Grant Program (PSGP)
Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP)
Freight rail / Intercity Bus / Intercity rail / Trucking security
Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG)
Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG)
Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program (IECGP)
VI. Disaster Operations Division
Lon Biasco, Director
Response Operations
Regional Response Coordination Center
Operational Planning
Disaster Logistics
Emergency Communications
VII. Disaster Assistance Division
Charles Axton, Director
Individual Assistance
Public Assistance
• Mass Care
• Emergency Assistance
• Housing
• Human Services
• Debris removal
• Emergency Protective Measures
• Restoration of damaged facilities
Planning and Prep • Conduct rapid Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs)
• Rapid Establishment of Disaster Recovery Centers (DRCs) – fixed or mobile
• Planning – evac, sheltering, feeding, voluntary org coordination, housing and human services, debris removal, generator requirements
Washington Storms – December 2007: 10,750 IA Registrations; $20 M in IA, $31 M SBA, $83 M in PA for 176 apps
Washington Storms – December 2008: 10,727 IA Registrations; $20 M in IA, $32 M SBA, $78 M in PA for 376 apps
Questions?