Feeder Separation Project

27
Feeder Separation Project Mohammed Suleman Secretary Energy, GoMP August 2012

description

Mr. Mohammad Suleman Secretary (Energy), Govt. of Madhya Pradesh at RPR 2012, 23-26 August, Goa, India

Transcript of Feeder Separation Project

Page 1: Feeder Separation Project

Feeder Separation Project Mohammed Suleman Secretary Energy, GoMP

August 2012

Page 2: Feeder Separation Project

Goal of Power Sector

To provide 24 Hours supply to every willing household in

the State by FY 13.

To ensure continuous 8 hours quality supply to

Agricultural consumers through separate feeders by FY 13.

Page 3: Feeder Separation Project

Challenges

Accurate Demand projection

Availability to meet demand

Transmission Network Strengthening

Distribution System Strengthening

Commercial viability of operations

Page 4: Feeder Separation Project

Commercial Scenario

AT&C losses

• Reduction in last 5 years – About 10%

• Current AT&C loss level – 31.62% (excluding transmission losses)

• Transmission losses – 3.51%

Share of Agriculture Consumption - 30%

Tariff Subsidy - Rs.1925 crore (FY 12)

Percentage recovery from Agriculture (net of Govt. subsidy) – 50%

RPU & ACoS Gap - Rs.1.03 per unit (FY 12)

Page 5: Feeder Separation Project

Proposed Solution

Separation of 11kV feeders for domestic and

agricultural use in rural areas.

Page 6: Feeder Separation Project

Objectives of FSP

“To provide commercially viable continuous

supply of electricity in rural habitations while

ensuring sufficient supply for agricultural use to

promote sustainable exploitation of ground

water, thereby to accelerate socio-economic

development of rural areas.”

Page 7: Feeder Separation Project

Benefits of FSP

Better quality & reliability of power supply due to separate 11kV feeders and

System strengthening.

Reduction in AT&C losses:

• Prevention of theft / Direct hooking from LT network catering to non-agricultural

load;

• Reduction in technical losses; and

• Restricted supply hours to agricultural pumps.

Reduction in Equipment failure.

Water Conservation with restricted hours of required power supply to

agricultural pumps.

Round the clock power supply would encourage development of rural

industries.

Improvement in Livelihood Index due to accessibility of power for 24 hours in

rural areas.

Page 8: Feeder Separation Project

No of Feeders require Separation

Name of Company Feeders to be

Separated

Feeders covered

RGGVY & Old

schemes

Feeders

covered under

Feeder

Separation

Scheme

No. No. No.

East 1891 246 1645

Central 1729 395 1334

West 2642 315 2327

State 6262 956 5306

Page 9: Feeder Separation Project

Scope of Feeder Separation Project

Particulars Unit East Discom Central

Discom

West

Discom State

33 kV S/s No 0 169 65 234

11 kV new

line Kms 37138 17571 16979 71688

DTR No 28504 32553 24640 85697

HVDS Kms 0 6438 5916 12354

Conversion

to AB Cable Kms 21487 15000 20503 56990

Meter No 587701 751269 596285 1935255

No of

Feeders No 1645 1334 2327 5306

No of

Villages No 15860 15745 10837 42442

Page 10: Feeder Separation Project

Project Cost of Feeder Separation

Name of the

Discom

1st Phase (REC) 2nd Phase(ADB)

Other Schemes (RGGVY & Old ADB) Total

Cost

Distt. (in

No.)

No. of feeders

Cost

Distt. (in

No.)

No. of feeders

Cost

No of Feeders

Cost

East 9 708 765.88 8 937 1012.32 280 119.37 1897.57

Central 7 516 427.13 9 818 717.88 376 510.80 1655.81

West 7 1209 528.26 7 1118 699.11 451 377.00 1604.37

State 23 2433 1721.27 24 2873 2429.31 1107 1007.17 5157.70

For the 1st Phase, Loan is sanctioned by REC Ltd.

For the 2nd Phase, Loan is sanctioned by ADB.

Cost (Rs in Cr)

Page 11: Feeder Separation Project

Project Methodology

• District-wise turnkey contracts for construction

• No material supply by the Discoms

• Contractor to design the system and approval by Independent

Engineer

• Construction supervision by Independent Engineering firm

• Concurrent supervision by Discom officers

• Centralized Project Management at Corporate offices

• Contractor to ensure loss level below 12% post completion at DTR

level

Page 12: Feeder Separation Project

Procurement Strategy (1/3)

Bid documents were prepared in advance

Contractor conferences were organized

• Delhi (04.08.2010,No of participants-35)

• Hyderabad (05.08.2010, No of participants-32)

• Mumbai (09.08.2010, No of participants-31)

Independent supervision- First time concept of PMC

introduced in the Discoms for better monitoring, quality

control & timely completion of the project.

• PMC for Phase-I: M/s Feedback Ventures Pvt. Ltd. for all 3

Discoms

• PMC for Phase-II: M/s UR Scott Wilson for West & East Discoms

M/s ICT Pvt. Ltd. for Central Discom

Page 13: Feeder Separation Project

Procurement Strategy (2/3)

Transparent process:

• National level publicity by arranging conferences in metro/ Tier-I cities;

• Publication in national newspapers; and

• Publicity through website of the Discoms.

Competition: Bids received

Award:

Discom Max. Nos. Min. Nos. Average

East 27 4 13

Central 24 6 12

West 23 6 14

Discom No of Contracts Awarded

East 29

Central 19

West 26

Page 14: Feeder Separation Project

Procurement Strategy (3/3)

Time taken in the process (Issue of NIT to LoA)

Some Names of contractors

• West Discom- M/s. Hythro Power Ltd. Gurgaon, M/s Aster Tele

Services Hyderabad, M/s Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. New Delhi, M/s

UbiTech Ltd. Faridabad, M/s NCC Ltd, M/s Vishwa Infrastructures

Services P. Ltd. M/s Megha Engg & Infra Ltd.–KEPCO(JV), M/s

Vishwanath Project Ltd., etc.

• East Discom- Aster, Godrej, KMG, Era, ARK, Ramky, Kepco Korea,

A2Z, Eltel, GET Power, New Modern, UB Engg.

• Central Discom- M/s KEI, Godrej, GET,NCC,Jyoti structure, Shyam

Indus, AMRCL.

Discom Phase-I Phase-II

East 3 months 6 months

Central 4.5 months 5 months

West 4 months 5.5 months

Page 15: Feeder Separation Project

PROGRESS OF FEEDER SEPARATION WORK UP

TO JULY 2012

Discom Total no. of feeder to be separated in all scheme

Cumulative progress of feeder separated up to 31st July 2012

% achievement

No. of feeders

Total villages

East 1891 617 4227 33%

Central 1729 578 3848 33%

West 2642 874 2665 33%

Total 6262 2069 10740 33%

Page 16: Feeder Separation Project

Final Results (Expected)

Particulars Existing After Feeder

Separation

Increase

No %

33kV S/s 2638 2872 234 9%

Length of 11kV

Lines in Km 216488 288176 71688 33%

Cable (Kms) 9560 69677 60117 629%

No of DTRs 302502 388199 85697 28%

Meter 6084683 8109417 2024774 33%

No of rural

domestic

Consumers (in

lakhs)

40.22 50.45 10.23 25%

State

Page 17: Feeder Separation Project

Sample Results

S. No.

Particulars AT&C Loss %

Before FSP

After FSP

1 11 KV Bhaitari feeder 39.90 29.50

2 11 KV Kusmi feeder 49.47 31.45

3 11KV Surkhi feeder 64.55 4.71

4 11KV Sehora feeder 85.13 15.87

5 11KV Mugalia Chhap & Kodia feeder 79.00 29.00

6 Distribution Centre Harsola (8 feeders) 69.45 9.78

7 Distn.Centre Teesgaon (14 feeders) 50.50 38.32

8 Dhar Circle (154feeders) 48.57 38.30

9 Distn.Centre Jaora (R) (4 feeders) 57.91 14.90

10 Distn.Centre Uplai (12 feeders) 66.10 29.21

Page 18: Feeder Separation Project

Thanks

Page 19: Feeder Separation Project

Sample Results - East Discom (1/3)

SN Name of

Divsiion

Name of

the

33/11KV

Sub-station

Name of 11KV feeder No. of

consumer

Input in

LU

Unit

Sold in

LU

Demand

in

Rs.lacs

Collection

efficiency

%

T&D Loss % AT&C

%Loss

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14

1

O&M Sidhi Kothiya

Bhitari

Data before

commencement of

FS 478 0.52 0.3 0.72 104.17 42.31 39.90

Data after

completion of FS 669 0.65 0.52 1.01 88.12 20.00 29.50

Percentage change

39.96 25.00 73.33 40.28 -15.41 -22.31 -10.40

3

O&M Sidhi Kusmi

Kusmi

Data before

commencement of

FS 440 0.5 0.33 1.41 75.89 33.41 49.47

Data after

completion of FS 504 0.33 0.28 1.56 80.13 14.45 31.45

Percentage change

14.55 -34.00 -15.21 10.64 5.59 -18.96 -18.02

Back

Page 20: Feeder Separation Project

Sample Results - East Discom (2/3)

Name of Town/DC/FS 11KV SURKHI FEEDER (SAGAR CIRCLE)

S.

No.

FY Input Unit

(LU)

Sold Unit

(LU)

Billing

Eff. %

T&D

Loss %

Demand

(Rs. in

lakh) Collection

(Rs. in

lakh)

Coll. Effi.

%

AT&C

Loss %

RPU

Rs./Unit

1 2009-10

(BEFORE FS) 18.12 7.80 44.15 55.85 7.85 6.30 80.30 64.55 0.35

5 2011-12

(AFTER FS) 10.04 8.65 82.88 13.86 31.54 34.89 110.63 4.71 3.48

Percentage

change -44.61 8.08 38.73 -41.99 453.87 30.33 -59.84 894%

Back

Page 21: Feeder Separation Project

Sample Results - East Discom (3/3)

Name of Town/DC/FS 11kv SEHORA FEEDER (Sagar Circle)

S.

No.

FY Input

Unit

(LU)

Sold Unit

(LU)

Billing

Eff. %

T&D

Loss %

Demand (Rs.

in lakh)

Collection

(Rs. in

lakh)

Coll.

Effi. %

AT&C

Loss %

RPU

Rs./U

nit

1 2009-10

(BEFORE FS) 5.73 1.00 17.43 82.57 21.30 18.17 85.33 85.13 3.17

5 2011-12

(AFTER FS) 9.89 8.27 83.63 16.37 35.62 35.83 100.60 15.87 3.62

%Change 72.45 727.32 66.20 -66.20 67.23 97.15 15.27 -69.26 14%

Back

Page 22: Feeder Separation Project

Sample Results - Central Discom

T&D AND AT&C LOSSES OF 11 KV MUGALIYA CHHAP AND 11KV KODIA FEEDER JOINTLY (A) BEFORE FEEDER SEPERATION

Month No. of Cons.

Input in LU

Sold Unit in

LU

T&D loss%

Demand Rs in Lakhs

Collection Rs in Lakhs

Collection efficiency

Billing efficiency

AT&C loss%

RPU

Apr-12 721 4.25 1.08 74.59 1.78 1.46 82% 25% 79% 0.34

(B) AFTER FEEDER SEPERATION

Month No. of Cons.

Input in LU

Sold Unit in LU

T&D loss%

Demand Rs in Lakhs

Collection Rs in Lakhs

Collection efficiency

Billing efficiency

AT&C loss%

RPU

Jun-12 2473 4.37 3.29 24.71 9.84 9.25 94% 75% 29% 2.12

Difference in %

243 3 284 (-)49.88 453 534 12% 50% (-)50% 523

Back

Page 23: Feeder Separation Project

AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTRES- HARSOLA

Total No. of 11 kV feeders-8 Village Covered- 3

11 KV feeders separated- 8 Village Benefitted- 3

Year Input in lacs Sold unit in

Lacs

Demand in

Lacs

Collection

in Lacs

Billing

Eff.

Collection

Eff.

AT&C

Losses RPU

2010-11 114.98 79.51 170.76 160.58 69.15 94.04 34.97 1.4

2011-12 130.29 98.19 210.88 224.33 75.36 106.38 19.83 1.7

Growth in 2011-

12 Compare to

2010-11

13.32 23.49 23.49 39.70 6.21 12.34 -15.14 0.33

Upto June-2011 36.29 13.89 35.44 28.28 38.28 79.80 69.45 0.8

Upto June-2012 23.78 18.39 55.71 64.99 77.33 116.66 9.78 2.7

Difference

-12.51 4.5 20.27 36.71 39.06 36.86 59.67 1.95

Growth in June-

12 compare to

June-2011 in %

-34.47 32.40 57.20 129.81 39.06 36.86 -59.67 250.71

Sample Results - West Discom (1/5)

Back

Page 24: Feeder Separation Project

AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTRES - TEESGAON

Total No.of 11 KV Feeders :- 14

Villages

Covered :- 29

11 KV Feeders Separated :- 14

Villages

Benefitted :-

29

Year Input in lacs Sold unit in

Lacs Demand in Lacs

Collection in

Lacs Collection Eff. Demand unit RPU AT&C Loss

2010-11 235.93 132.83 249.55 254.39 101.94 57.39 1.06 43.70

2011-12 251.17 156.34 338.95 323.67 95.49 59.44 1.35 37.76

Growth in 2011-

12 compare to

2010-11

6.46 17.70 35.82 27.23 -6.45 2.05 0.29 -5.94

Upto JUNE 2011 45.28 20.15 44.36 40.86 92.11 40.99 0.98 55.50

Upto JUNE 2012 43.09 26.58 66.89 62.03 92.73 57.20 1.55 38.32

Numeric

Difference in

JUNE 12

compare to JUNE

11

-2.19 6.43 22.53 21.17 0.62 16.21 0.57 -17.18

Growth in JUNE

2012 compear to

JUNE 2011 in %

-4.84 31.91 50.79 51.81 0.62 39.55 58.45 -17.18

Sample Results - West Discom (2/5)

Back

Page 25: Feeder Separation Project

AN ANALYSIS OF - DHAR CIRCLE

Total No.of 11 KV Feeders :- 244 Villages Covered :- 1337

11 KV Feeders Separated :- 154 Villages Benefitted :-483

Year Input in lacs Sold unit in

Lacs

Demand in

Lacs

Collection in

Lacs Billing Eff.

Collection

Eff. RPU AT&C Loss

2009-10 749.00 466.55 12120.55 12215.23 62.29 100.78 1.62 37.71

2010-11 832.37 537.66 15289.52 14834.17 64.59 97.02 1.84 35.41

2011-12 1034.67 695.67 20110.84 19147.58 67.24 95.21 1.94 32.76

Growth in 2010-

11 compare to

2009-10

11.13 15.24 26.15 21.44 2.30 -3.76 0.22 -2.30

Growth in 2011-

12 compare to

2010-11

24.30 29.39 31.53 29.08 2.64 -1.81 0.11 -2.64

Upto June 2011 210.74 108.39 3708.84 3290.76 51.43 88.73 1.76 48.57

Upto June 2012 222.43 137.24 4991.96 4666.90 61.70 93.49 2.24 38.30

Growth in June

2012 compear to

June 2011

5.55 26.62 34.60 41.82 10.27 4.76 0.48 -10.27

Sample Results - West Discom (3/5)

Back

Page 26: Feeder Separation Project

AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTERS -JAORA(R)

Total No. of 11 KV Feeders -: 4 Villages Covered-: 17

11 KV Feeders Separated-: 4 Villages Benefitted-:17

Year Input in lacs Sold unit in

Lacs

Demand in

Lacs

Collection

in Lacs Billing Eff.

Collection

Eff.

Demand

unit RPU % loss AT&C Loss

2009-10 212.44 138.91 275.59 226.78 65.39% 82.29% 1.3 1.07 34.61% 46.19%

2010-11 205.3 145.2 292.83 266.45 70.73% 90.99% 1.43 1.3 29.27% 35.65%

2011-12 217.66 167.28 381.16 367.82 76.85% 96.50% 1.75 1.69 23.15% 25.84%

Growth in

2010-11

compare

to 2009-10

-3.36% 4.53% 6.26% 17.49% 5.34% 8.70% 0.13 0.23 -5.34% -10.55%

Growth in

2011-12

compare

to 2010-11

6.02% 15.21% 30.16% 38.04% 6.13% 5.51% 0.32 0.39 -6.13% -9.81%

Up to

May-2011 35.65 19.21 48.91 38.2 53.88% 78.10% 1.37 1.07 46.12% 57.91%

Up to

May-2012 32.39 26.78 64.52 66.41 82.68% 102.93% 1.99 2.05 17.32% 14.90%

Growth

in May-

2012

compare

to May-

2011

-9.14% 39.41% 31.92% 73.85% 28.79% 24.83% 0.62 0.98 -28.79% -43.02%

Sample Results - West Discom (4/5)

Back

Page 27: Feeder Separation Project

AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTERS - UPLAI

Total No. of 11 KV Feeders -: 12 Villages Covered-: 29

11 KV Feeders Separated-: 12 Villages Benefitted-:29

Year Input in lacs Sold unit in

Lacs Demand in

Lacs Collection in

Lacs Billing Eff. Collection Eff.

Demand unit

RPU % loss AT&C Loss

2009-10 274.4 145.42 304.91 264.11 53.00% 86.62% 1.11 0.96 47.00% 54.10%

2010-11 303.38 173.78 366.89 314.47 57.28% 85.71% 1.21 1.04 42.72% 50.90%

2011-12 348.53 186.76 422.8 429.55 53.59% 101.60% 1.21 1.23 46.41% 45.56%

Growth in

2010-11

compare to

2009-10

10.56% 19.50% 20.33% 19.07% 4.29% -0.91% 0.1 0.07 -4.29% -3.19%

Growth in

2011-12

compare to

2010-11

14.88% 7.47% 15.24% 36.59% -3.70% 15.88% 0 0.2 3.70% -5.34%

Up to May-

2011 59.07 22.81 54.98 48.26 38.62% 87.78% 0.93 0.82 61.38% 66.10%

Up to May-

2012 51.48 25.77 59.93 84.75 50.06% 141.41% 1.16 1.65 49.94% 29.21%

Growth in

May-2012

compeart

to May-

2011

-12.85% 12.98% 9.00% 75.61% 11.44% 53.64% 0.23 0.83 -11.44% -36.89%

Sample Results - West Discom (5/5)

Back