Feedback for self-regulation
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
christina-hendricks -
Category
Education
-
view
1.178 -
download
2
Transcript of Feedback for self-regulation
![Page 1: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Feedback on writing: concerns,
suggestionsChristina Hendricks
Philosophy, UBCNovember 21, 2013
![Page 2: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Helping students become self-regulated writers
Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick (2006)
• Self-regulation: students set goals to be reached, have effective strategies for achieving them, and the ability to put those strategies into effect.
• Students must know:
1. what good performance is (i.e. the student must possess a concept of the goal or standard being aimed for);
2. how current performance relates to good performance (for this, the student must be able to compare current and good performance);
3. how to act to close the gap between current and good performance. (these three points quoted from Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick 2006, p. 204; referring to Sadler (1989))
![Page 3: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Problems in feedback for self-regulation
Goals set by students for their work differ from those needed to complete the task well
• Suggestions: written descriptions of criteria & standards, examples of work that does/does not live up to them, peer review to evaluate others’ work on criteria (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick 2006, p. 206)
![Page 4: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Problems in feedback for self-regulation
Students don’t understand how their work hasn’t lived up to goals
‣ Feedback too vague, not enough detail (Weaver, 2006; Walker, 2009; Carless, 2006)
‣ Students don’t see how feedback applies to their work
‣ Students don’t understand feedback (Walker, 2009)
• Example: “too much description, not enough analysis” (Chanock, 2000)
![Page 5: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Problems in feedback for self-regulation
Students don’t know how to bridge gap between current work and successful performance
‣ Need feedback that gives specific suggestions for improvement on future work (Weaver, 2006; Carless, 2006)
‣ Feedback should be related to goals/standards/criteria, and show how students’ work reaches or falls short of those (Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2006)
• Marking rubrics may be helpful for this
![Page 6: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Problems in feedback for self-regulation
Students are unable to use feedback to improve future assignments
‣ Not enough feedback that can be transferred to later work; most or all is focused on particular assignment (Lizzio & Wilson, 2008)
‣ Too many comments; students overwhelmed (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006; Lunsford, 1997)
‣ Too much negative feedback demoralizing; positive feedback vague while negative specific (Weaver, 2006)
‣ Feedback comes too late to be used on later work
![Page 7: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Discussion
• What do you do when providing feedback on student work that you think is effective (or not)?
• What one or two things will you take away from all this to use in giving feedback in the future?
![Page 8: Feedback for self-regulation](https://reader038.fdocuments.us/reader038/viewer/2022100603/55903d971a28ab9a6a8b45be/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Works citedCarless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233.
Chanock, K. (2000). Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 95-105.
Lizzio, A. and Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263-275.
Lunsford, R.F. (1997). When less is more: Principles for responding in the disciplines. New Directions For Teaching and Learning, 69, 91-104.
Nicol, D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 67-78.
Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379-394.