Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and...

42
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions

Transcript of Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and...

Page 1: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Federal Program Directors’ Workshop

June 18-19, 2012

Linda BraggDivision of Educator Quality and

System Support

Effective Professional Development Decisions

Page 2: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Professional Development ConsiderationsA. Finance Choices for Professional Development that Produce the Greatest Gains in School Performance & Student Learning

B. Considering Effective Professional Development as Part of:1.The District’s Continuous Improvement Plan 2.The District’s Professional Development Plan3.The District’s Highly-Qualified Plan

a. Recruitingb. Retainingc. Retraining

4. Comprehensive System of Support for Improving Professional Practice

Page 3: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Title Program Requirements

• Must be based on needs of the school district listed within the 5 year plan

• Must be targeted first at schools identified for improvement

• Must focus on enhancing student achievement

• Must be supplemental positions and not supplant state or local funds

Page 4: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

House Bill 4236 Major Provisions

1. Establishes a new system of educator performance evaluations that is based on the current pilot

2. Provides for “phased- in” implementation

3. Requires state board rules by July 2013

4. Provides for evaluations to serve certain purposes, including plans of improvement and personnel actions

5. Provides the intent of new comprehensive system of support and requires the state board to publish guidelines on comprehensive system of support

Page 5: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

WV State Board of Education Guidelines

• Expectation that the highest priority for county, regional and state professional development will be on meeting the needs indicated by the results of annual educator performance evaluations

• Substantial redirection of existing professional development resources toward this highest priority

• Adoption of the Learning Forward (formerly National Staff Development Council) Standards for Professional Learning

5

Page 6: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

WV State Board of Education Comprehensive System of Support Guidelines

• Utilized as the basis for the design and implementation of a comprehensive system of support for improving professional practice in each county school system (county plan)

• Implementing systemic change in schools and classrooms is a long-term process that requires a significant commitment of professional development, technical assistance and continuous support

6

Page 7: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Considering Finance Choices for Effective Professional Development

Evidence-Based Approach to:

• Effective resource allocation and use (resource reallocation, if necessary)

• Strategic use of human resources

Page 8: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

What Guides the Thinking to Use our Time and Money

Effectively?

Page 9: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

How does your district proportion the categories that result in professional

learning that increases educator effectiveness and desired results for all

students?

Professional Learning Categories• Face-to-Face Workshops/Trainings• New Teacher Induction• Job-Embedded Professional Development

(Peer Support)• Technical Assistance for Educators (who need

to improve performance)

Page 10: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Setting the Stage for Learning and Instruction

“Creating a collaborative environment has been described as ‘the single most important factor’ for successful school growth and the ‘first order of business’ for those seeking to enhance the effectiveness of their school.”

DuFour & Eaker, 1998

1

Page 11: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Why Collaboration?

“The idea that a single teacher, working alone, can know and do everything to meet the needs of 30 diverse students every day throughout the school year has rarely worked, and it certainly won’t meet the needs of learners in years to come.”

Carroll, 2009

1

Page 12: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Collaborate About What?

If we want our professional development efforts to have a significant impact on student learning, we should focus those efforts on the factors that significantly

impact learning.

Page 13: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

13

Put a slide of the Critical questions of teaching and learning here

Critical Questions of Teaching & Learning

1. What do all students need to know, understand and be able to do in this lesson or unit of study?

1.5 -- What CORE instruction will best facilitate the learning?

2. How will we know if they have learned it?

2.5 -- What evidence will we accept during the learning that indicates where each student is on the learning progression?

3. How will we respond if students do not learn? 3.5 -- What TARGETED or INTENSIVE instruction will likely have the most impact,

given the evidence of student learning? 4. How will we respond when they already know it?4.5 -- What projects or collaborative studies will likely have the most impact for enrichment or acceleration, given the evidence of student learning?

Page 14: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

What Support Would You Give?

How can we provide the support to ensure teams use their collaborative team time in ways that have a positive impact on student learning?

Page 15: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Could coaching be anopportunity to

Support Teaming Processes?

Page 16: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Could coaching be anopportunity to Support Beginning Teacher

Induction?

Page 17: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Could coaching be an

opportunity to build capacity of teachers to assist

peers after the coach is gone?

Page 18: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

We engage in and assume leadership for promoting

collaborative practice.

Noted educator Roland Barth wrote, “The relationship among the adults in the building has more impact on the quality and character of the school and the accomplishments of its youngsters than any other factor.”

Page 19: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

In what ways could coaches assist teachers or teacher teams with

focusing on the Critical Questions of Teaching & Learning?

Let’s Ponder

Would utilizing coaches to support job-embedded PD be more effective than a workshop for translating learning into practice?

Page 20: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

20

Page 21: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

21

Page 22: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

22

•there is no limit to the amount of federal funding you may choose to spend on coaches?

•coaches may count toward the mandatory requirements of 10% PD for Title I or 25% PD for Title II, Part D?

Did you know that for Title Programs...

Page 23: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Curriculum & Instructional

23

Categories of Coaches in West Virginia

Work of Curriculum & Instructional Coaches

Page 24: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

C & I

Technology

24

Categories of Coaches in West Virginia

Page 25: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

C & I

Technology

School Improvement

25

Categories of Coaches in West Virginia

Page 26: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

C & I

Technology Induction

School Improvement

26

Categories of Coaches in West Virginia

Page 27: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

27

The Work/Influence that is Common to All Coaches in West Virginia

Coaching for School Growth

Page 28: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Why Coaching?

“Coaching facilitates learning from and with colleagues, sustained over time, where reflection, analysis, dialogue and problem-solving strategies are applied.”

Kinkead, 2007

1

Page 29: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Effective Coaches

• Create partnerships with teachers, teacher teams and principals

• Establish trusting relationships

• Facilitate instructional growth

Kinkead, 2007

1

Page 30: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

WVDE’s Professional Learning Structure of Support for

West Virginia Coaches

Page 31: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Task Force Recommendations for supporting coaches and mentors

Policy Support(teacher induction) Resources

Strategic Professional Development

Page 32: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Supporting Improved Learning and Instruction through a

Community of Practice

1

Page 33: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Data / Evidence

CollaborativeConversations

CollectiveCommitment

Collective Efficacy

Instructional/EngagementChange

Kids See Their LearningIs Different/Better

“Student Sees Success”

Student SelfEfficacy

IMPACTSSTUDENT

ACADEMICSUCCESS

TRUST

Organizational Learning

Instructional Best Practices (CAI)

Psychology of Learning

Page 34: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Coaching for School Growth

The Work of Coaches Supporting All Educators

A.Coaching Teaming Processes (collaborative and leadership teams)

B. Coaching for Professional Performance (individual educators)

1. Specific Technical Assistance for Individual Teachers2. Induction: Mentorship and/or Coaching of Beginning Teachers

Page 35: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Standards for Professional DevelopmentThe WVBOE has adopted the Learning Forward (formerly National Staff Development Council) Standards for Professional Learning, as its guide for providing high quality professional development. According to the standards, professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students: Occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal alignment; Requires skillful leadership to develop capacity, advocate, and create support systems for professional learning; Requires prioritizing, monitoring, and coordinating resources for educator learning; Uses a variety of sources and types of student, educator, and system data to plan, assess, and evaluate professional learning; Integrates theories, research, and models of human learning into learning designs to achieve its intended outcomes; Applies research on change and sustains support for implementation of professional learning for long-term change; and Aligns its outcomes with educator performance and student curriculum standards.

Page 36: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Is Professional Development in your district primarily based on….

•Teacher preferences?•Grant determinants?•Various district offices’ control?

Page 37: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Effective Professional Development

• Why?

• How?

• What?

• Peer Support

Page 38: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

“In theory there is no difference between theory and practice;

in practice, there is.”

variously attributed to Jan La Van De Snepscheut

or Albert Einsteinor Yogi Berra

Let’s Ponder Implementation

Page 39: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Transferring Professional Development Learning into Classroom Practice

Component Knowledge Skill Transfer

• Why? Theory 10% 5% 0%

• How? Demonstration 30% 20% 0%

• What? Practice 60% 60% 5%

• Peer Support 95% 95% 95%

Page 40: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Data / Evidence

CollaborativeConversations

CollectiveCommitment

Collective Efficacy

Instructional/EngagementChange

Kids See Their LearningIs Different/Better

“Student Sees Success”

Student SelfEfficacy

IMPACTSSTUDENT

ACADEMICSUCCESS

TRUST

Organizational Learning

Instructional Best Practices (CAI)

Psychology of Learning

• What happens when we go directly here?

Page 41: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Which way will your District Leadership Team choose to

support professional development?

Page 42: Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.

Which ways will your District Leadership Team support collaborative teaming ?