Federal Enterprise Architecture (ITI LOB)
Transcript of Federal Enterprise Architecture (ITI LOB)
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)IT Infrastructure LoB Meeting
June 5, 2008
Kshemendra [email protected]
Chief Architect
Office of Management and Budget
For more information see notes page.
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 2
Agenda
• Introductions
• Key Messages
• Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) 101
• Annual Assessment – Today and Tomorrow
• FEA Budget Visualization – Vertical vs. Horizontal
• Next Generation Practice Guidance (NGPG)
• Practical Guide to Federal Service Oriented Architecture (PGFSOA)
• Questions & Discussion
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 3
Key Messages
• Purpose of Enterprise Architecture is to Improve Performance (Functional & Quality), Avoid Cost, and Save Money
• Shared Leadership – Shared Results
• Segment Architectures are the Key
• Problems & Solutions are Cross Boundary
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 4
FEA Context – Business Case Scoring
PMA PM AS PI SE PR EA AA* RM PB Total
Government-wide Average 3.4 3.7 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.2 3.9 3.5 3.5 3.1 35Perfect Evaluation 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 50
Exhibit 300 Evaluations Profile - Government-wide AverageEvaluation Sections
0
1
2
3
4
5PMA
PM
AS
PI
SE
PR
EA
AA*
RM
PB
Government-w ide Average
Perfect Evaluation
Exhibit 300 Evaluations Profile - Agency X
* - As AA Section is not completed/submitted for Steady State Investments, PM Evals were used.
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 5
Business Reference Model (BRM)• Lines of Business• Agencies, customers, partners
Service Component Reference Model (SRM)• Service domains, service types• Business and service components
Technical Reference Model (TRM)• Service component interfaces, interoperability• Technologies, recommendations
Data Reference Model (DRM)• Business-focused data standardization • Cross-agency information exchanges
Bu
siness-D
riven A
pp
roa
chB
usin
ess-Driven
Ap
pro
ach
Performance Reference Model (PRM)
• Inputs, outputs, and outcomes• Uniquely tailored performance indicators
Co
mp
on
ent-B
ased
Arch
itecture
Co
mp
on
ent-B
ased
Arch
itecture
FEA Context – Reference Models
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 7
Transition Strategy / Federal Transition Framework
Targ
et
EA
wit
h S
eg
men
tsInterim Target 1
Cu
rren
t E
A “
Base
lin
e”
Baseli
ne
Seg
men
tA
rch
itect
ure
Program B
Project 1Project 2Project 3Project 4Project 5
Project 6Project 7Project 8Project 9
Project 10Project 11Project 12Project 13
PerformanceImprovement
Summary
Program A
Program D
Transition Strategy
Interim Target 2
Interim Target 3
Base
lin
eS
eg
men
tA
rch
itect
ure
Seg
men
tA
rch
itect
ure
Project 6Project 7Project 8Project 9
Program C
Bas
elin
eS
eg
men
tA
rch
ite
ctu
re
Lin
e o
f B
usin
ess
Seg
me
nt
Arc
hit
ect
ure
Seg
men
tA
rch
itect
ure
Exhibit 53(All IT Investments)
Exhibit 300
53 Line Item
53 Line Item
Exhibit 300
Exhibit 300 53 Line Item
Major IT Investments
53 Line Item
53 Line Item
53 Line Item
Program and Project Milestones:• Performance Improvement• Cost Savings / Cost Avoidance
53 Line Item
Cross-Agency Initiatives (FTF)
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 8
Annual Assessment – Framework
Architect Invest ImplementIntegrated IT Lifecycle
Completion Use Results
Cost Savings and Cost Avoidance Transition Strategy Performance Enterprise Architecture Value IPv6
Governance and Program Mgt. Change Mgt. and Deployment Segment Architectures/
Collaboration and Reuse CPIC Integration
Performance Architecture Business Architecture Data Architecture Service Component
Architecture Technology Architecture Transition Strategy
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)*
4.0 4.0 4.0Threshold for GREEN
Evaluation of Measures and Metrics
Assignment of Policies and Procedures
Review of ArtifactsHow
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 9
Proposed Changes to Assessment Framework
Architect Invest ImplementIntegrated IT Lifecycle
Completion Use Results
Indirect Indicators (PART, IT as a percent of discretionary spend)
Attributable, Causal Results Implementation of ETP
EA Policy & Process, CPIC Process Integration
Measured Alignment between ETP and Portfolio of 300s & 53
Performance Mgmt Integration
Any Segments
Priority Segments: Core Mission (RMO Input) IT Infra & Info Sharing
Proposed Evolution
4.0 4.0 4.0Threshold for GREEN
Delivery against planned improvement commitments
Use of segment codes to measure alignment
Template-based
segment submissionsHow
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 10
FEA Budget Visualization – Federal IT Budget
* Dollars shown in millions
Federal IT Spending by AgencyNumber of
Investments Total DME SSDepartment of Agriculture 235 $2,429 $477 $1,952Department of Commerce 146 $2,295 $877 $1,418Department of Defense 2,194 $33,032 $11,945 $21,087Department of Education 229 $593 $55 $539Department of Energy 651 $2,038 $208 $1,830Department of Health and Human Services 684 $5,681 $1,017 $4,663Department of Homeland Security 343 $5,317 $1,731 $3,586Department of Housing and Urban Development 82 $313 $52 $262Department of the Interior 236 $965 $139 $826Department of Justice 234 $2,750 $902 $1,848Department of Labor 137 $542 $102 $439Department of State 103 $1,045 $241 $805U.S. Agency for International Development 39 $103 $36 $67Department of Transportation 321 $2,981 $1,604 $1,377Department of the Treasury 305 $3,061 $563 $2,499Department of Veterans Affairs 84 $2,534 $640 $1,894U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 29 $392 $37 $356Environmental Protection Agency 157 $455 $92 $363General Services Administration 82 $558 $84 $473National Aeronautics and Space Administration 43 $1,874 $348 $1,527National Archives and Records Administration 26 $136 $72 $64National Science Foundation 24 $83 $20 $63Nuclear Regulatory Commission 53 $155 $35 $120Office of Management and Budget 3 $5 $1 $4Office of Personnel Management 37 $89 $19 $69Small Business Administration 31 $85 $15 $70Smithsonian Institution 24 $66 $5 $61Social Security Administration 34 $1,139 $342 $798
Federal Grand Total: 6,566 $70,716 $21,657 $49,060
Agency FY2009 Request
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 11
Co
re
Mis
sio
nB
usi
nes
s S
ervi
ces
En
terprise S
ervices
* Dollars shown in millions
FEA Budget Visualization – BRM & SRM View
Services to Citizens 2,291 $29,677 42%Defense and National Security 268 $11,594Health 494 $5,398Transportation 183 $3,128Homeland Security 135 $2,551Community and Social Services 39 $1,188General Science and Innovation 218 $960Environmental Management 173 $860Law Enforcement 89 $834Income Security 34 $591Education 137 $591Disaster Management 129 $575Intelligence Operations 40 $471Economic Development 64 $281Natural Resources 120 $231Correctional Activities 6 $110Workforce Management 42 $107Energy 54 $71International Affairs and Commerce 33 $70Litigation and Judicial Activities 33 $66
Support Delivery of Services 828 $2,987 4%General Government 219 $1,914Planning and Budgeting 248 $455Public Affairs 112 $249Controls and Oversight 156 $224Revenue Collection 27 $79Internal Risk Management and Mitigation 18 $40Regulatory Development 40 $26Legislative Relations 8 $0
Management of Government Resources 3,262 $33,447 47%Information and Technology Management 1,390 $25,894Supply Chain Management 583 $2,605Financial Management 538 $2,448Human Resource Management 480 $1,590Administrative Management 271 $910
FY2009 Request*
Number of Investments
Supporting Services 185 $4,606 7%Management of Processes 22 $2,149Development and Integration 6 $1,506Communication 9 $189Asset / Materials Management 10 $131Systems Management 4 $91Customer Initiated Assistance 8 $87Knowledge Management 20 $81Supply Chain Management 10 $69Security Management 16 $69Human Resources 9 $67Customer Relationship Management 13 $44Knowledge Discovery 4 $34Investment Management 11 $27Document Management 3 $22Data Management 8 $17Tracking and Workflow 7 $9Financial Management 10 $7Reporting 5 $3Collaboration 2 $2Visualization 3 $1Content Management 1 $1Forms Management 2 $0Analysis and Statistics 1 $0Search 1 $0
Number of Investments
FY2009 Request*
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 12
Next Generation Practice Guidance (NGPG)
• Goal: Increase the value from, and use of, segment architecture
• Process & Deliverables:– Identify most valuable segment architecture products
and ideas• Self-selected, proven, and supported
– Analyze and index best practices– Synthesize and publish guidance, methodology,
templates, and training materials– Template-based view for segment architectures
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 13
NGPG – Targeted Outcomes
• Shared Best Practices
• Faster Time to Complete
• Greater Consistency and Completeness
• Lower Barriers to Reuse– Architectures– Solutions– Services– Information
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 14
PGFSOA - Background
• Federal CIO Council
– Architecture & Infrastructure Committee
– American Council on Technology / Industry Advisory Council
• Targeting Chief Architects
– CIOs, & Program Executives
• Goal is to Provide Practical & Useful Guidance
• Leverages Existing Best Practices
• Focus on Federal-Specific Context
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 15
PGFSOA – Organization (~70 Pages)
• Executive Summary & Acknowledgements
• Introduction
• Rationale
• Target
• Keys to Implementation
• Roadmap
• Glossary & References
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 16
PGFSOA – Target
Service Oriented Enterprise · Agreed behaviors and clear incentives for collaboration· Mutually leveraged investments· Enhanced mission outcomes
Service Oriented Architecture
· Interoperability at build time based on open standards and composable adapters
· Agile recapitalization· Centrally-managed registries and repositories
Service Oriented Infrastructure · Secure, scalable infrastructure as a service· Interoperability at run time · Service enabled network
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 17
PGFSOA – Review & Revise Process
• Go to the PGFSOA Wiki– http://smw.osera.gov/pgfsoa/index.php/Welcome– Read the “PGFSOA QuickStart for Contributors”– Read the document (including list of contributors)– Look at the discussion pages and recent contributions– Make attributes contributions– Track the evolution of the document including your input
• Web 2.0 Style Process– version 1.1– Seeking adoption and use on the merits– With use and results, feedback and future iterations
• PGFSOA Editorial Board makes final decisions– Based on input – skewing towards Practitioners– Eventually will be put forward to FCIOC for formal endorsement
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 18
Questions and Discussion
Key Messages:
• Purpose of Enterprise Architecture is to Improve Performance (Functional & Quality), Avoid Cost, and Save Money
• Shared Leadership – Shared Results
• Segment Architectures are the Key
• Problems & Solutions are Cross Boundary
Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 19
For Further Information:www.egov.gov