AgendagNetworking and Coffee ……….………………………………………..……....8:00 AMCall to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, and Welcome – Bob Fischer, Vice President,

NAHC…………………………….…….….………………...8:30 AMNAHC Reports:NAHC Reports:

TreasurerDowntown 2030 Plan2011 Candidate ForumsDuPage Stormwater Ordinance

Special Focus – City of Naperville Financial UpdateNAHC Open forumAdjourn…………………………………………………………………………..…10:00 AM

February 2011February 2011General Membership Meeting

February 19, 2011Meeting Rooms B&C

Naperville Municipal CenterNaperville Municipal Center

Pledge of AllegiancePledge of Allegiance

Welcome!Welcome!Bob Fischer

Vice President - NAHCVice President NAHC

Thank youThank you

www.simply-homemade.comwww.simply homemade.com

5024 Ace Lane, Suite 104Naperville IL 60564Naperville, IL 60564

SW corner of 111th and Route 59

“Snow Heroes” WantedSnow Heroes WantedDid one of your neighbors go above and b d i th i ff t t h l t ft thbeyond in their efforts to help out after the

recent blizzard?Th NAHC ld lik t i thThe NAHC would like to recognize them

with a "Neighbor-to-Neighbor" award. To nominate, send an email by 2/28 with

their info (name, address, etc) and what they did along with your contact

information to:nahc-naperhomeowners@wowway.com.

Downtown Liquor StudyDowntown Liquor Study

• “analyze the restaurant and bar mix in theanalyze the restaurant and bar mix in the Downtown and consider corresponding amendments to the Naperville Liquoramendments to the Naperville Liquor Code”

• NAHC Representatives Allen Panek &• NAHC Representatives – Allen Panek & Dr. Bob Buckman

Work with the NAHCWork with the NAHC

• NAHC Liaison CommitteesNAHC Liaison Committees• Confederation’s eyes and ears to key civic

and government groupsand government groups• 1-2 hours per month, report back to Board

d b hi t ti d th hand membership at meetings and through monthly NAHC Newsletter

1. ACTHA/CAI: Allen Panek2 Arboretum (SLRCA): John Mesarchik2. Arboretum (SLRCA): John Mesarchik3. State Government: Allen Panek4 Will County: Gary Vician4. Will County: Gary Vician5. DuPage County: Steve Grosskopf, Gary Vician6. SD 203: Kathy Benson7. SD 204: Gary Vician8 T t ti K th B8. Transportation: Kathy Benson9. Zoning and Land Use: Thom Higgins10 Water/Stormwater/Wastewater: Allen Panek10. Water/Stormwater/Wastewater: Allen Panek and Erskine Klyce11. Park District: John Mesarchik12. Township: Gary Vician13. Chamber: Dr Bob Buckman

Upcoming Meeting Dates to Remember

• March 19 NAHC General Meeting –March 19, NAHC General Meeting Focus on Landscaping

• April 16 NAHC General Meeting Focus• April 16, NAHC General Meeting - Focus on City CouncilM 21 C f d ti A l M ti &• May 21, Confederation Annual Meeting & Elections

And finallyAnd, finally…

Treasurers Report

Coming Soon – 2011 Dues Invoices

A real bargain at only $30!!!

NAHC ReportsNAHC Reports• Downtown 2030 Plan

T ffi d ti d t b l d f– Traffic and congestion need to be planned for– Keep building heights at 43 feet– Excessive density in the SSAExcessive density in the SSA– Possible stoplight on Washington– 5’ Sidewalks should be discouragedg– Further information needed on “Opportunity Sites”

http://www.napervillehomeowners.com/NAHC/NewsDoc/NewsDoc12094.pdf

NAHC ReportsNAHC Reports

• Election 2011 Candidate ForumsElection 2011 Candidate Forums

J h M hikJohn MesarchikSecretary- NAHC

2011 Candidate Forums2011 Candidate Forums

• February 23 - City Council (7 PM)February 23 City Council (7 PM)• February 24 - Mayor (7:30 PM)

M h 14 SD 204 (7 30 PM)• March 14 – SD 204 (7:30 PM)• March 21 – Park District(7:30 PM)• March 24 - SD 203 (7:30 PM)

• Structured Format• Moderators – Bob Fischer/Barb Dwyer• Candidate Opening Statementp g• Two NAHC “pre-posed” questions• Audience Questions• Audience Questions• Closing Statements• Broadcast Live on WCNC (Channels

6/10/99), Re-broadcast on NCTV17• Help Wanted!!!

NAHC ReportsNAHC Reports

• DuPage Stormwater Ordinance UpdateDuPage Stormwater Ordinance Update

E ki KlErskine KlyceAssociate Director - NAHC

Article 4: Ordinance Applicability to D l tDevelopment

• Classes and distinctions between types ofClasses and distinctions between types of projects and site features (New 15-40):– Wetlands– Buffers– Floodplains– Project site is a plated lot 12,000 sq ft or lessj p , q– Minor Project – Roadway, Open Space Development, Public Water and Sewer

Improvement ProjectsImprovement Projects– Project Site is less than one acre– All other projects

Article 4: Stormwater Management CertificationsCertifications

• When is a permit required?When is a permit required?Current Ordinance (Old 15-147.1)•Hydrologic Disturbance of

Draft Ordinance (New 15-31)•Addition of more than 500 sq ft ofHydrologic Disturbance of

More than 5000 sq. ft•Presence of a Special Management area

•Addition of more than 500 sq ft of new impervious area or more than 5000 sq ft of land disturbance, and lot size is more than 12,000 sq. ft.•Presence of a Special Management area

When is a Erosion and Sediment Control Pl R i d?Plan Required?

Current Ordinance (Old 15-149)N di ti ti i d

Draft Ordinance (New 15-40 Table 1)Additi f th 500 ft f• No distinctions, required

whenever a permit is required.• Addition of more than 500 sq ft of

new impervious area or more than 5000 sq ft of land disturbance, lot size between 12 000 sq ft and onesize between 12,000 sq ft and one acre: “Letter of Permission” required.

• More than 500 sq ft new impervious• More than 500 sq.ft new impervious, more than 5000 sq. ft. of land disturbance, and lot is over one acre-Full plan unless “Minor Project”Full plan unless Minor Project

When is site runoff storage (detention) required?required?

Draft Ordinance (New 15-40 Table 1 and 15-68 Table 2)Required if based on Total Impervious Area (TIA) of the site• TIA increases, or has decreased less than 5%, And cumulative new TIA

from Feb. 1992 is greater than 25,000 sq. ft.• And, TIA of developed site is over 10%.• “Open Space Development” or “Roadway” projects only if they will

increase discharges after development and only enough to maintain pre-g p y g pproject discharge rates.

Draft Ordiance (New 15-40 Table 2 and 15-73)Draft Ordiance (New 15 40 Table 2 and 15 73)• Requires a “Water Control Volume” if new TIA is greater than 500 sq. ft.• Can satisfy BMP requirement,

Req ired ol me is ded cted from an req ired site r noff storage• Required volume is deducted from any required site runoff storage

City of NapervilleC ty o ape eFinancial Update

Karen DeAngelisKaren DeAngelisDirector of FinanceCit f N illCity of Naperville

Council Budget Workshop ScheduleCouncil Budget Workshop Schedule

FY11 Update

Property Tax

FY  B d  B l iFY12 Budget Balancing

FY12 Capital ProgramCap ta og a

Utility Funds

General Fund Long Range View23

Sept 14 – Revenue WorkshopEAV ImplicationsEAV ImplicationsPotential Revenue Streams 

October 25 –Tax Levy Workshop and FY12 Fiscal Forecast Pl   d   T  L3yr Plan and 2010 Tax Levy

Mayor & Council budget 

November 30 – FY12 Fiscal ForecastService Based Budget General Fund Departments

December 13 – FY12 Fiscal ForecastService Based Budget Utility FundsService Based Budget Utility FundsOther Funds – expenditure and fund balance

January 24 –Total Compensation 

February 7 – CIP

24

Remaining WorkshopsFebruary 22 – 5 Yr View

h dMarch 7 – FY 12 Budget 

d h d l f lProposed Schedule of Council Actions March 15 ‐ Schedule Public Hearing

l blApril 6 ‐ Public HearingApril 19 ‐ Budget Adoptionl d b lFile ordinances by April 30 

25

Signs of Economic Stabilization/RecoverySigns of Economic Stabilization/RecoverySales Tax up 11% from last year!Hotel Tax up 7%Hotel Tax up 7%Food & Beverage Tax up 5%Property Sales ▪ Residential▪ Number of Transactions down slightly  (4%)▪ Average Sales Value recovering ‐ up slightly ($10,000 to $383,000)g g p g y ( , 3 3, )

▪ Commercial ▪ More than double last year!     ($223mil vs. $91mil)!

MIP GrantsMIP GrantsSprint Settlement

26

2 700 000

2 300 000

2,500,000

2,700,000

1 900 000

2,100,000

2,300,000

1 500 000

1,700,000

1,900,000

1,500,000

27

FY2010 FY2009 FY2008 FY2011

Revenue Budget too OptimisticRevenue Budget too OptimisticState unemploy drops per capita income tax by 2% ▪ State cash flow delays – avg  132 days lateState cash flow delays  avg. 132 days late

Utility tax Lower ambulance billings and lower recoveries Lower ambulance billings and lower recoveries 

Change in Red Light Traffic Programg g gOffset partially by tow fee

Union Contract Wage Increases 28

fRevenue increases exceed the few revenue shortfalls and the expenditure increasesDriven by significant one‐time funding sources

Projected Fund balance $1.2 million to help balance FY12 Budget!

29

School District 203 & COD/ City of Naperville/ DuPage County & Naperville Township/Other 3 / y p / g y p p/Other

76% %

6% 5%

76% 13%

School District 204 & COD/ City of Naperville/ Will County & Wheatland Township/ Other

4%

74%11% 11%

4%

30

City of NapervilleHistory and Projection of Assessed Equalized

$8,000,000,000

History and Projection of Assessed Equalized Valuation

$6.1B

$6.6B

$7.0B $7.1B

$6.7B

$6.4B

$7,000,000,000

luat

ion

8.10%

5.94%1.34%

-5.00%

$5.2B

$5.6B$6.2B

$6,000,000,000

Ass

esse

d Ev

al

8.07%

8.85%

-3.00%

-5.00%

$4.8B$5,000,000,000

9.42%

7.77%

31

$4,000,000,000 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12* forecast FY13* forecast FY14* forecast

Fi l Y

FY12 – 2010 Tax LevyLevy submitted dollar reduction 2.5% ($1.25 mil)EAV decline estimated at 5%Resulting in:▪ Rate increase of 2.5% ‐ from .7166 to .7358▪ Avg dollar savings per household of $22‐$25 yr 

M h March Actual EAV receivedPotential for Abatement Considered

32

A Different Way to Look at Dept Budgetsy p gHigh Level Picture of Services DeliveredReconfirm Services to be Provided

Align Department Goals and Performance Measuresg pAssociate Services with Related CostsAllow Sense Check  of Value of Services

P id  F k t  Ch ll  E dit  b  Provide Framework to Challenge Expenditures by Challenging the Services they Deliver

Elimination of discretionary servicesS i   d i   h      b   b   lService reduction where cost may be above valueNote that delivery of services are inter‐connected.  Reductions in one may not necessarily change resource/cost requirements unless corresponding reductions are made in other services as unless corresponding reductions are made in other services as well.

33

A Different Way to Look at Dept Budgetsy p gHigh Level Picture of Services DeliveredReconfirm Services to be Provided

Align Department Goals and Performance Measuresg pAssociate Services with Related CostsAllow Sense Check  of Value of Services

P id  F k t  Ch ll  E dit  b  Provide Framework to Challenge Expenditures by Challenging the Services they Deliver

Elimination of discretionary servicesS i   d i   h      b   b   lService reduction where cost may be above valueNote that delivery of services are inter‐connected.  Reductions in one may not necessarily change resource/cost requirements unless corresponding reductions are made in other services as unless corresponding reductions are made in other services as well.

34

DPW Reduce street sweeping 40 1 Reduce street sweeping 40.1 Eliminate tree planting on city sites 2.5 Eliminate replacement mosquito sprayer 9.0 Reduce replacement parkway tree planting 100.0 Eliminate 2 week spring leaf collection 36 8 Eliminate 2 week spring leaf collection 36.8 Reduce contract streetlight maintenance 90.0 Eliminate herbicide services 6.0 Maintain current mowing service levels 13.7TEDTED Lengthen inspection times and elim apron/curb/sidewalk repair, reduce surveys & road 88.1 Combine ZBA/PC into one Board 17.4 Elim tollway study and various other amendments 60.9 Reduce historic sites mtg frequency & special projects 8.7g q y p p j

CMO Bridges in house and mail with utility bills 48.0 Eliminate TRAC lobbyist 17.0

35

Defer citizen survey 34.7Total Cost Savings from Service Reductions 572.9

Revenue Expenditure Fund Bal Revenue Expenditure GapFY11 Projection FY12 Budget

p p pOctober Workshop 114.5 113.6 0.9 109.2 111.7 ‐1.6  Adopted Property Tax levy below flat dollar ‐1.2 ‐1.2  Increase Sales Tax Revenue Projection 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0  Police and Sergeants Union Wage and Healthcare 1.9 ‐1.9 1.6 ‐3.5  November Police Force Reductions ‐0.4 0.4 ‐0.8 1.2Other Considerations       Healthcare plan design and contribution at only 15% 0.8 ‐0.8       Potential other union and non‐union wage increases 1.4 ‐1.4Council suggested contingency for potential higher gap ‐0.7 ‐0.7Gap Perspective at November Workshop Session 115.0 115.1 ‐0.1 107.8 114.7 ‐7.0

C il C h d & k hCouncil Concensus Reached at Nov & Dec Workshops  Expenditure reduction options to be implemented 0.4 ‐1.2 1.6  Service Reductions to be implemented ‐0.6 0.6  City Manager Productivity Challenge ‐0.7 0.7  SECA pay down Carillon Line of Credit over 3 years 0.6 0.6  Cancel streetlight contractor, work to be done by Electric Utility ‐0.6 0.6g , y y  E‐911 fund balance  0.2 0.2 0.2Gap Position at end of December Workshop 115.2 115.1 0.1 108.8 112.2 ‐2.7

  Increase Sales Tax Revenue Projection 0.75 0.8 0.75 1.5  State grant resurface Naper Blvd 0.2 0.2 0.2IML i i i i i 0 2 0 2

36

  IML optimism on increasing income tax revenue 0.2 0.2  Increase projected ambulance fee FY11 0.1 0.1 0.1

Current Gap Position 116.3 115.1 1.2 109.8 112.2 ‐0.7

FY12 CIP Program - $56 million$23 mil General Corporate, $33 mil Utilities▪ 16% lower than FY11 program▪ 42% and $40 mil lower than FY09!

$8 il l th FY12 j ti l t $7 il G l C t▪ $8 mil lower than FY12 projection last year - $7 mil General Corporate▪ Funding Available for 58%

UnfundedUnfunded$5 mil General Corporate▪ $4 mil lower FY11 contracts - $2 mil remaining available▪ $1 mil debt service fund balance available▪ $2 mil anticipated lower contract cost on FY12 projects▪ No Borrowing required!!!!$11 mil Electric▪ Borrowing required for CIP over $12 mil annual target$8 mil Water/Wastewater▪ Phase in of new rates over 3 years, borrowing required FY12 37

($millions) Projected Plan Years($ millions) ProjectedFY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

Electric  Operating Revenue 126.4 129.8 133.6 133.6 137.6  Bond Proceeds 7.8

Plan Years

  Operating Expenses 117.4 121.3 125.5 126.2 126.3  Capital 11.9 10.4 7.2 11.0 11.1  Debt Service 0.0 3.9 5.4 3.6 4.2     Total Expenditures 129.3 135.6 138.1 140.8 141.6pNet Revenue/(Deficit) ‐2.9 2.0 ‐4.5 ‐7.2 ‐4.0

Water/Wastewater  Operating Revenue 29.2 31.3 37.4 37.4 37.4

  Operating Expenses 27.2 29.2 30.5 30.8 30.8  Capital 10.0 1.4 7.1 7.1 7.1  Debt Service 0.0 2.1 2.5 2.8 1.4     Total Expenditures 37.2 32.7 40.1 40.7 39.3

38

Net Revenue/(Deficit) ‐8.0 ‐1.4 ‐2.7 ‐3.3 ‐1.9

Utilities operating in a deficit position  – rate studies being conducted this year.

Revenue DeclinesRevenue DeclinesAbsence of One Time Sources used for FY12 General Fund Property Tax Component Reduced by 

h f hHigher Requirements of Other Components▪ Managing Total Levy to Flat Dollar or Rate

Revenue IncreaseInflation and Growth in Revenue will be fully offset by Expenditure Increases due to Inflation and Growth 

Expenditure IncreasesExpenditure IncreasesSalary, Wages and Benefits, including PensionsVehicle Replacements Previously DeferredRoadway Improvement External Funding Will Decline

39

Financial GapFinancial GapFY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Flat Property Tax Dollar ‐11.2 ‐12.8 ‐15.6 ‐22.4     Declining EAV ‐2.5 ‐4.0 ‐3.7 ‐3.5Flat Property Tax Rate ‐ .7358 ‐13.7 ‐16.8 ‐19.3 ‐25.9

The Future is Uncertain –But Budget Balancing Challenges Will Continue

40

NAHC OPEN FORUM

Watch for the March Newsletter and Keep an Eye on Our Website atan Eye on Our Website at

www.napervillehomeowners.com

Thanks for being gpart of the NAHC