FEATURE 13 - Jane Cornwell · 2018. 7. 19. · FEATURE 13 theaustralian.com.au/review October 7-8,...

1
13 FEATURE theaustralian.com.au/review October 7-8, 2017 V2 - AUSE01Z01AR In 1979, aged 15, the young Rithy escaped to a refugee camp in Thailand, later relocating to Provence, France, where his brother lived. While in Paris to study carpentry, he was hand- ed a video camera during a party, kick-starting a fascination for the moving image; he graduated from the Institute for Advanced Cinemato- graphic Studies a few years later. As he writes in The Elimination, his ac- claimed 2012 autobiography (co-authored with Christophe Bataille), for a long while Panh wouldn’t — couldn’t — talk about what he had been through. He refused to speak Khmer, his native language. He rejected all links to Cambo- dia. He has previously quoted the Italian Jewish writer Primo Levi, who, haunted by his experi- ences in Auschwitz, wrote of the deep feelings of shame and guilt often experienced by survivors of death camps: “You feel others have died in your place, that we’re alive because of a privi- lege we haven’t deserved, because of an injus- tice done to the dead.” Time provided the necessary distance, as it does for so many victims of genocide: “Levi’s memoir [If This is a Man] was only read by 1500 people when it was published [in 1947]. Nobody wanted to talk about why. But you know, when I am made to eat roots and insects like an animal, when my dignity is stripped from me, I cannot feel like a human being. I have to learn how to live again.” He shrugs. “Cambodians didn’t want to see my early films. They wrote letters asking me to stop. Maybe they were ashamed, or the pain was too great. Then slowly parents and children came to see my films and they started to talk. Sometimes they cry. They tell me they are grateful, which makes me happy.” Panh’s 1989 debut, Site 2, about a family of Cambodian refugees in a Thai camp in the 1980s, won several awards; 1994’s Rice People, which followed the struggles of a rural family, became the first Cambodian film to be submit- ted for a (foreign language) Oscar; 2003’s S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine brought together ex-prisoners and their former captors in Tuol Sleng prison, the former high school where the atrocities took place; 2012’s Duchy: Master of the Forces of Hell features interviews with a Khmer Rouge leader convicted of crimes against humanity, a chilling encounter Panh also recalls in his book. “I do other films to show that I can,” he says, referencing 2008’s The Sea Wall, his feature adaptation of the 1950 novel by Marguerite Duras starring French actress Isabelle Huppert. “I have a choice to do films that make a lot of money. But if you go this way, if you make, say, a comedy film, you will not come back. I was a first-generation Khmer film director after the genocide. I felt that my place was to give Cambodia a view from the inside. We needed to write our own story.” He is no fan of Roland Joffe’s multiple- Oscar-winning 1984 film The Killing Fields: “It is very, very difficult to represent death by geno- cide. While I recognise that films like The Killing Fields and [Steven Spielberg’s World War II epic] Schindler’s List attracted the attention of millions of people, these directors did not exper- ience the genocide. “Of course I am humble and I applaud them. I could not direct a huge cast in how to kill and how to die. But I have to find other ideas.” What, then, of Jolie? Having first visited Cam- bodia in 2000 to film Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, then going on to adopt her Cambodian-born son Maddox in 2002, the Hollywood A-lister and activist is a long-time fan of the country. But she too did not experience the genocide. Does her outsider status help or hinder a film like First They Killed My Father? Panh beams. “I love Angelina very much, mainly because she is authentic. When she flew to Cambodia to meet me I was impressed by her very European sensibility, the fact she under- stood everything so well. I liked that she wanted to make the film in Khmer. Which was about time,” he says wryly. “In Schindler’s List all the Nazis speak English. “Before filming began Angelina issued a statement to the crew stipulating that they were to respect the Cambodian people, stating that this was Cambodia’s history, not theirs. Every day she would come to me alone with her driv- er; at lunchtimes she would wait by herself in a taxi queue, in the heat. I don’t know how she is seen elsewhere but in my country Angelina Jolie is very loved.” Panh has a singular aesthetic as a filmmaker, a style originating in trauma and developed to contain it. His films are thoughtful, elegiac, with an austerity that makes them more powerful. Violence is implied, the humanity of victims and survivors implicit. His is a cinema of hope, and of memory. “When I was in the village with my family, forced to wear black, I would sometimes imagine myself in colour. If I remembered a tune, I would keep it as my private souvenir deep in my heart, so that it could not be destroyed or taken away. Art is like this. It is a form of resistance that can keep you alive. “This is why I believe a piece like Bangsokol can change attitudes by bringing people togeth- er to think about humanity, about war. Get them talking to their children, strengthening the next generation, the ones who have the capacity to reaffirm their identity and bring back imagination. Otherwise,” he adds, his gaze steady, “history will repeat.” As Panh writes in The Elimination, the history of Cambodia is in the deepest sense our history, human history. The responsibility he feels to tell his country’s story, whether through film, theatre or in person, is palpable. “So many died trying to protect others. It’s as if there is a train, and these very courageous people got up to give me their seat, their place. I have to do something with that. This is why I am here.” He gazes out the window and smiles. “I owe it to the dead, as much as to the living.” A Requiem for Cambodia: Bangsokol runs at Hamer Hall on Friday and Saturday as part of Melbourne Festival. Film director and writer Rithy Panh, inset below left; and scenes from A Requiem for Cambodia: Bangsokol, which will have its world premiere at Melbourne Festival. BANGSOKOL PICTURES: TEY TAT KENG

Transcript of FEATURE 13 - Jane Cornwell · 2018. 7. 19. · FEATURE 13 theaustralian.com.au/review October 7-8,...

Page 1: FEATURE 13 - Jane Cornwell · 2018. 7. 19. · FEATURE 13 theaustralian.com.au/review October 7-8, 2017 V2 - AUSE01Z01AR In 1979, aged 15, the young Rithy escaped to a refugee camp

13FEATURE

theaustralian.com.au/review October 7-8, 2017V2 - AUSE01Z01AR

In 1979, aged 15, the young Rithy escaped to arefugee camp in Thailand, later relocating toProvence, France, where his brother lived.While in Paris to study carpentry, he was hand-ed a video camera during a party, kick-starting afascination for the moving image; he graduatedfrom the Institute for Advanced Cinemato-graphic Studies a few years later.

As he writes in The Elimination, his ac-claimed 2012 autobiography (co-authored withChristophe Bataille), for a long while Panhwouldn’t — couldn’t — talk about what he hadbeen through. He refused to speak Khmer, hisnative language. He rejected all links to Cambo-dia. He has previously quoted the Italian Jewishwriter Primo Levi, who, haunted by his experi-ences in Auschwitz, wrote of the deep feelings ofshame and guilt often experienced by survivorsof death camps: “You feel others have died inyour place, that we’re alive because of a privi-lege we haven’t deserved, because of an injus-tice done to the dead.”

Time provided the necessary distance, as itdoes for so many victims of genocide: “Levi’smemoir [If This is a Man] was only read by 1500people when it was published [in 1947]. Nobodywanted to talk about why. But you know, when Iam made to eat roots and insects like an animal,when my dignity is stripped from me, I cannot

feel like a human being. I have to learn how tolive again.” He shrugs. “Cambodians didn’twant to see my early films. They wrote lettersasking me to stop. Maybe they were ashamed,or the pain was too great. Then slowly parentsand children came to see my films and theystarted to talk. Sometimes they cry. They tell methey are grateful, which makes me happy.”

Panh’s 1989 debut, Site 2, about a family ofCambodian refugees in a Thai camp in the1980s, won several awards; 1994’s Rice People,which followed the struggles of a rural family,became the first Cambodian film to be submit-ted for a (foreign language) Oscar; 2003’s S21:The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine broughttogether ex-prisoners and their former captorsin Tuol Sleng prison, the former high schoolwhere the atrocities took place; 2012’s Duchy:Master of the Forces of Hell features interviewswith a Khmer Rouge leader convicted of crimesagainst humanity, a chilling encounter Panhalso recalls in his book.

“I do other films to show that I can,” he says,referencing 2008’s The Sea Wall, his featureadaptation of the 1950 novel by MargueriteDuras starring French actress Isabelle Huppert.“I have a choice to do films that make a lot ofmoney. But if you go this way, if you make, say,a comedy film, you will not come back. I was afirst-generation Khmer film director after thegenocide. I felt that my place was to giveCambodia a view from the inside. We needed towrite our own story.”

He is no fan of Roland Joffe’s multiple-Oscar-winning 1984 film The Killing Fields: “It isvery, very difficult to represent death by geno-cide. While I recognise that films like The KillingFields and [Steven Spielberg’s World War IIepic] Schindler’s List attracted the attention ofmillions of people, these directors did not exper-ience the genocide.

“Of course I am humble and I applaud them.I could not direct a huge cast in how to kill andhow to die. But I have to find other ideas.”What, then, of Jolie? Having first visited Cam-bodia in 2000 to film Lara Croft: Tomb Raider,then going on to adopt her Cambodian-bornson Maddox in 2002, the Hollywood A-listerand activist is a long-time fan of the country.But she too did not experience the genocide.Does her outsider status help or hinder a filmlike First They Killed My Father?

Panh beams. “I love Angelina very much,mainly because she is authentic. When she flewto Cambodia to meet me I was impressed by hervery European sensibility, the fact she under-stood everything so well. I liked that she wantedto make the film in Khmer. Which was abouttime,” he says wryly. “In Schindler’s List all theNazis speak English.

“Before filming began Angelina issued a

statement to the crew stipulating that they wereto respect the Cambodian people, stating thatthis was Cambodia’s history, not theirs. Everyday she would come to me alone with her driv-er; at lunchtimes she would wait by herself in ataxi queue, in the heat. I don’t know how she isseen elsewhere but in my country AngelinaJolie is very loved.”

Panh has a singular aesthetic as a filmmaker,a style originating in trauma and developed tocontain it. His films are thoughtful, elegiac, withan austerity that makes them more powerful.Violence is implied, the humanity of victims andsurvivors implicit. His is a cinema of hope, andof memory. “When I was in the village with myfamily, forced to wear black, I would sometimesimagine myself in colour. If I remembered atune, I would keep it as my private souvenirdeep in my heart, so that it could not bedestroyed or taken away. Art is like this. It is aform of resistance that can keep you alive.

“This is why I believe a piece like Bangsokol

can change attitudes by bringing people togeth-er to think about humanity, about war. Getthem talking to their children, strengtheningthe next generation, the ones who have thecapacity to reaffirm their identity and bringback imagination. Otherwise,” he adds, his gazesteady, “history will repeat.”

As Panh writes in The Elimination, thehistory of Cambodia is in the deepest sense ourhistory, human history. The responsibility hefeels to tell his country’s story, whether throughfilm, theatre or in person, is palpable.

“So many died trying to protect others. It’s asif there is a train, and these very courageouspeople got up to give me their seat, their place. Ihave to do something with that. This is why Iam here.” He gazes out the window and smiles.“I owe it to the dead, as much as to the living.”

A Requiem for Cambodia: Bangsokol runs at Hamer Hall on Friday and Saturday as part of Melbourne Festival.

Film director and writer Rithy Panh, inset below left; and scenes from A Requiem for Cambodia: Bangsokol, which will have its world premiere at Melbourne Festival.

BANG

SOKO

L PI

CTUR

ES: T

EY T

AT K

ENG