FCM Analysis with interpretation.doc

download FCM Analysis with interpretation.doc

of 3

Transcript of FCM Analysis with interpretation.doc

  • 7/29/2019 FCM Analysis with interpretation.doc

    1/3

    Logistic Regression

    Dependent Variable Encoding

    Original Value Internal Value

    No 0

    Yes 1

    Categorical Variables Codings

    Frequency

    Parametercoding

    (1)

    Employment unemployed 37 1.000

    employed 4 .000

    Gender Male 4 1.000

    Female 37 .000

    Block 0: Beginning Block

    Classification Table(a,b)

    Observed Predicted

    Practice (Is Px

    Compliant)Percentage

    CorrectNo Yes

    Step 0 Practice (Is PxCompliant)

    No0 14 .0

    Yes 0 27 100.0

    Overall Percentage 65.9

    a Constant is included in the model.b The cut value is .500

    Block 1: Method = Enter

    Model Summary

    Step-2 Log

    likelihoodCox & SnellR Square

    Nagelkerke RSquare

    1 40.385 .258 .357

    Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

    Step Chi-square df Sig.1 5.379 8 .716

    Classification Table(a)

  • 7/29/2019 FCM Analysis with interpretation.doc

    2/3

    Observed Predicted

    Practice (Is Px

    Compliant)Percentage

    CorrectNo Yes

    Step 1 Practice (Is Px

    Compliant)

    No

    6 8 42.9Yes 4 23 85.2

    Overall Percentage 70.7

    a The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

    95.0% C.I.for E

    Lower

    Step 1(a) AGE -.086 .052 2.760 1 .097 .918 .829

    GEN_REC(1)

    -.933 1.676 .310 1 .578 .393 .015

    EMP_REC(1)

    2.588 1.426 3.295 1 .069 13.302 .814

    DM_YR .144 .074 3.729 1 .053 1.154 .998

    DM_REL -.874 1.088 .645 1 .422 .417 .050

    EDUC_ATT

    1.019 .694 2.156 1 .142 2.769 .711

    KNOWL_SC

    -.534 .247 4.671 1 .031 .586 .361

    ATT_SC -.015 .031 .239 1 .625 .985 .926

    Constant 6.161 4.715 1.708 1 .191 474.013

    a Variable(s) entered on step 1: AGE, GEN_REC, EMP_REC, DM_YR, DM_REL, EDUC_ATT, KNOWL_SC,ATT_SC.

    Note: Only Knowledge Score is statistically significant in predicting Compliance(the rest are may be due to chance): OR = 0.586, 95% CI: 0.361 0.951, p = 0.031.Interpretation of OR: for every increase in the Knowledge score by 1 point, theresan increase of odds of having compliance by 0.586.

    Heres my own re-coding of the variables:

  • 7/29/2019 FCM Analysis with interpretation.doc

    3/3

    Variables:

    Age

    Gender [Gen_Rec] (0 = male, 1 = female)

    Employment [Emp_Rec] (I used Employment instead of Occupation)

    (0 = unemployed, 1 = employed)

    DM_yr = Number of years with DM type 2 (I used DM_yr instead ofDiabnumyears)

    DM_rel = Does Px have Relatives with DM type 2? (0 = no, 1 = yes)

    (I used DM_rel instead of Diabrel)

    Educ_att = Educational attainment (0 = none, 1 = elementary, 2 = high

    school, 3 = college)

    (I used Educ_att instead of Edattain)

    Knowl_Sc = total score gotten in the knowledge test (I used Knowl_Sc instead

    of Knowledgeover)

    Att_Sc = total score gotten in the attitude test (I used Att_Sc instead of

    Attitudeover)