FAST: Fuel and Sheath Modelling Tool · 2016-08-12 · Transient Validation • Modeled FIO-131...
Transcript of FAST: Fuel and Sheath Modelling Tool · 2016-08-12 · Transient Validation • Modeled FIO-131...
Research Impetus• Existing IST codes started 35+ years ago
• Aging code architecture and implementation• VERY low computational requirements• Hardcoded and closed source (inflexible)• Separate codes for NOC and Transients
• Close a gap in modeling capabilities at RMC• Provide sheath stress/strain model• Compliment existing RMC models
• Interest in advanced fuels and materials• Need to develop model to support them
2
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Model Objectives• 2-D model of fuel
• Normal and accident conditions• Improved deformation model
• Full geometric detail• Circumferential ridging• Axial dependent effects
• Comsol platform• Multiphysics capable• Compatible with other RMC models• Short development time
• Proof-of-concept validation/comparison• with other codes• with experimental data
3
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
What is ?• COMSOL is general purpose ODE & PDE solver
• Self-contained finite-element package• Geometry, meshing, solvers• Pre & post processing capability• GUI & MATLAB scripting interfaces
• User-defined and pre-built modules• Heat-transfer, Solid-mechanics, Electro-Magnetics, Fluid
dynamics, Acoustics, Optics, Chemistry, optimization… • Weak and Coefficient forms for custom equations
• Flexible coupling of equations
• More general/flexible than ANSYS or Abaqus
4
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
2
2a au u c u u u aue d
t tf
Model Geometry
5
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
PeriodicSymmetry
Azimuthal Uniformity(about center axis)
Z
R
Model Overview
6
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Pellet Gap Cladding/Sheath2D Heat Transport+ Conduction+ Flux Depression
Linear-Elastic Material+ Thermal Expansion+ Densification+ Fission Product Swelling
Fission Gas Release+ Release to grain boundary+ Release to free volume
Grain GrowthBurnup
Dynamic Gap+ Locally calculated size+ Solid-mechanics driven
1D Heat Transport+ Solid-to-Solid + Radiative + Mixed-Gas Thermal
Conductivity & Temp.Jump Dist.
Pellet-to-Sheath ContactGas Pressure+ Non-HomogeneousTemp+ Sheath Lift-Off+ Deformed Geometry
2D Heat Transport+ Conduction+ Sheath-to-Coolant HT
Linear-Elastic Material+ Anisotropic Thermal Expansion+ Gas and Coolant Pressure+ Anisotropic Creep
+ Irradiation Creep+ Grain-Boundary Sliding+ Dislocation Glide+ α↔β Transition Creep
Oxide Layer Growth
NOC Validation• Code-to-code comparison of in reactor
centerline and fuel surface temperatures• Three linear powers
• Code-to-Experimental Data from AECL-CRL• 7 NOC fuel elements (CANDU fuel pins)
• Manufacturing parameters and irradiation histories• PIE Sheath deformation measurements• Results compared with ELESTRES and ELESIM
7
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
NOC Validation - End of Life
8
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
NOC Validation - End of Life
9
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
NOC Validation - End of Life
10
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Transient Validation• Modeled FIO-131 blowdown experiment
• 1.3% 235U UO2 pellets in Zircaloy sheath • Instrumented element in X2 loop (NRX)
• Thermocouples for centerline, periphery and sheath surface temperatures
• Internal gas pressure transducer
• Very low burnup (~3 MWh/kgU)• Internal pressure set to ~8 MPa Argon• Pre-transient: 10 MPa, 560-600 K, ~65 kW/m• Transient:
• Loss of coolant (Max sheath T 1145 K)• ~25 s power pulse (channel voiding)
11
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Transient Validation
12
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Transient Validation
13
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Transient Validation
14
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Transient Validation
15
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
25 Pellet Model Results• Transient validation case with larger geometry
• All 25 pellets in element (rodlet)• Pellets are meshed together (not free-floating)
• Some extra limitations• Does not yet calculate internal gas pressure• Special version of FAST (no text input files)• No end-caps
16
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
25 Pellet Model Results
17
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Applications & Future Work• Integration with other UO2 models
• I-SCC model (Kleczek 2010) (Ossouren, MASc)• Failed fuel models:
• Fission gas release (STAR 2009)• Secondary hydriding (Bruni 2010)• Fuel oxidation (Shaheen 2011)
• Advanced Fuels & SCWR Fuel Concept (Bell, PhD)• Outlet 625ºC 25 MPa (48% thermal efficiency)• (Th, U, Pu)O2 Mixtures up to 13% fissile• Cladding Zircaloy-4 (inlet only), 310-SS, SiC?• Looking for Collaboration!
18
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Potential Future Work• Checking failure criterion• Axial effects
• End-flux-peaking, end-cap effects
• 3D geometry• Element bending, pellet cracking
• Improved separate effect models• Crack Growth• Unification of FG release and swelling models
• Developing and testing new phenomena models• Looking for collaborators!
19
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Conclusions• The FAST code is currently under development
• Bug testing, validation, and feature additions are still ongoing
• Preliminary validation shows good potential• Still room for improvement
• Versatile research tool• Many potential applications• Looking for collaborators!
20
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Acknowledgements• I’d like to thank the following people and groups
for their advice and technical support• My supervisors Dr. Lewis and Dr. Chan• Current and former colleagues at RMC• Chalk River Laboratories
• I’d also like to thank the following organizations for equipment, data and funding• RMC, AECL, UNENE, COG, NSERC
• I’d like thank the organizers for the opportunity to present
21
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Questions?
22
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
NOC Validation Code to Code
23
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
NOC Validation Code to Code
24
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions
Transient Validation
25
Impetus Objectives Model Results Applications Conclusions Questions