Faris's Synopsis

8/10/2019 Faris's Synopsis

1/12

1

The Impact of Inventory and Receivable Management on

Profitability of Selected Paper and Board Companies in Pakistan

Introduction

Working Capital (WC) is the flow of ready funds necessary for the working of a concern.

Working Capital Management is the administration of current assets and current liabilities. It

deals with the management of current assets and current liabilities, directly affects the

liquidity and profitability of the company (Deloof, 2003; Eljelly, 2004; Raheman and Nasri,

2007; Appuhami, 2008; Christopher and Kamalavalli, 2009; Dash and Ravipati, 2009).

Working capital management is the important function of financial management. The

financial manager must determine the satisfactory level of working capital funds and also

optimum mix of current assets and current liabilities. He must ensure that the appropriate

sources of funds are used to finance working capital and should also see that short term

obligation of the business are met well in time. After cash the inventory and receivables are

current assets which need proper management.

Inventory management involves the control of the assets that are produced to be sold

in the normal course of the firms operations. The general categories of inventory include raw

materials inventory, work-in-process inventory, and finished-goods inventory. The

importance of inventory management to the firm depends on the extent of its inventory

investment. The importance of effective inventory management is directly related to the size

of the investment in inventory. The effective management of these assets is essential to the

goal of maximizing shareholder wealth. To control the investment in inventory, managers

must solve two problems: the order quantity problem and the order point problem.

Accounts receivables represent money owed by entities to the firm on the sale of

products or services on credit. All firms by their very nature are involved in selling either

goods or services. Although some of these sales will be for cash, a large portion will involve

credit. Whenever a sale is made on credit, it increases the firms accounts receivable. Thus,

the importance of how a firm manages its accounts receivable depends on the degree to

which the firm sells on credit.


2/12

2

Receivables is one of the three primary components of working capital, the other two being

inventory and cash. Receivables occupy second important place after inventories and thereby

constitute a substantial portion of current assets in several firms. The capital invested in

receivables is almost of the same as that of the investment made in cash and inventories.

Accounts receivable typically comprise more than 25 percent of a firms assets. So the

management of accounts receivable means the management of one-quarter of the firms

assets. The cash flows from a sale cannot be invested until the account is collected, the

control of receivables takes on added importance in that it affects both the profitability and

liquidity of the firm. Effective management of receivables facilitates to increase the size of

the business activities by increasing total sales consequently increasing recycling of funds

and generating higher profitability.

Problem Statement

Most of the times it is noticed that firms does not hold the right amount of stocks, debtors and

cash. Due to this reason the firm is unable to meet its maturing short term obligations and its

upcoming operational needs. Lack of adequate working capital also means that a firm is

unable to undertake expansion projects and increase its sales, therefore limiting the growth

and profitability of the business. Proper management of inventory and receivables leads to the

increase profitability.

Research Question

1. Does Inventory control have an impact on firms profitability?

2. What impact Inventory management has on profitability of the paper and board sector

of Pakistan?

3. What impact receivable management has on profitability of the paper and board sector

of Pakistan?


3/12

3

Objective of the research

The objective of this study is as follow:

1.

Examining how Inventory control effect profitability of an organization.

2. To study how Inventories and receivables are managed in paper and board sector.

3. To analyze the impact of Inventory management on profitability.

4. To analyze the impact of receivable management on profitability.

Significance of the study

There are many studies which are focusing on the impact of working capital management on

firm profitability. However, one can hardly find the study on combination with the impact of

inventory and receivable management on profitability. This study takes importance to

manage the inventory and receivable management practices for improving profitability of the

paper and board industry of Pakistan. The results will display the impact of inventory and

receivable management on profitability.

Limitation of the study

The limitations of this study are as follow:

1.

The analysis of this study is mainly based on secondary data.

2. The study covers for 10 years from 2004- 05 to 201314.


4/12

4

Literature review

Management of inventories and receivables was found to have a significant impact on

profitability in studies from different countries.

Sinha .KP, Sinha.AK and Singh. SC (1988) in their study on the analysis of working capital

management in Fertilizer Corporation of India with reference to Gujarat State Fertilizer

Corporation revealed that a huge portion of funds was tied up in the form of working capital,

especially in inventories and receivables. The study revealed ineffective management of

working capital as the prime cause for erosion in profits. It found that the management of

receivables particularly was highly unplanned and ineffective, which resulted in unpredicted

cash inflows and huge amount of bad debts. The study strongly recommended urgent action

to avoid further deterioration.

Suk. H, Kim.SH and Rowland have conducted a survey among 94 Japanese companies

in USA (1992) found that they differed in working capital management practices from the US

companies in terms of lower levels of inventory and higher levels of accounts receivables.

The study revealed that the US firms piled-up their inventories; Japanese firms had higher

percentage of receivables to total assets.

Padachi. K (2006) examined the trends in working capital management and its impact on

firmsperformance. The results proved that a high investment in inventories and receivables

is associated with lower profitability. Further, he showed that inventory days and cash

conversion cycle had positive relation with profitability. On the other hand, account

receivables days and account payables days correlated negatively with profitability.

Deloof, M (2003) found a significant negative relation between gross operating income and

thenumber of days accounts receivables, inventories and accounts payables of Belgian firms.

These results suggested that managers can create value for their shareholders by reducing the

number of days accounts receivables and inventories to a reasonable minimum. The negative

relationship between accounts payable and profitability inconsistent with the view that less

profitable firms wait longer to pay their bills.


5/12

5

Ramachandran, A andJanakiraman, M (2009) analyzed the relationship between working

capital management efficiency and earnings before interest and tax of the paper industry in

India. The study revealed that cash conversion cycle and inventory days had negative

correlation with earnings before interest and tax. While accounts payable days and accounts

receivable days related positively with earnings before interest and tax.

Falope and Ajilore (2009)used a sample of 50 Nigerian quoted non financial firms for the

period 1996 2005. Their study utilized panel data econometrics in a pooled regression,

where time series and cross sectional observations were combined and estimated. They found

a significant negative relationship between net operating profit on one hand and the average

collection period (ACP) and average payment period (APP) on the other hand for a sample of

fifty Nigerian firms listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange.

Mathuva (2009) examined the influence of receivables and payables management on

corporate profitability by using a sample of 30 firms listed on the Nairobi stock exchange

(NSE) for the periods 1993 to 2008. He used Pearson and Spearmans correlations, the

pooled ordinary least square (OLS), and the fixed effects regression models to conduct data

analysis. The key finding of his study was: there exist a highly significant negative

relationship between the ACP and Profitability.

N. Venkata ramana, K. Ramakrishnaiah and P. Chengalrayulu (2013) examined the

impact of Receivables Management on Working Capital and Profitability. To accomplish this

research objective data have been collected from the annual reports of select cement

companies for the period from2001 to 2010. The ratios which highlight the efficiency of

receivables management viz., Receivables to Current Assets Ratio, Receivables to Total

Assets Ratio, Receivables to Sales Ratio, Receivables Turnover Ratio, Average Collection

Period, Working Capital Ratio and Profitability Ratio, have been computed statistical tools

like ANOVA was also used to know the impact on working capital and profitability. Working

capital and profitability were considered as dependent variables. The investigation reveals

that the receivable management across cement industry is efficient and showing significant

impact on working capital and profitability.

Dr. Srinivas Madishetti and Mr. Deogratias Kibona (2013) determine the impact of

average collection period and average payment period on SMEs profitability In Tanzania.


6/12

6

The study is carried out using dependent variable as gross operating profit and independent

variables as average collection period and average payment period employing relevant

information of 38 Tanzanian SMEs,s for the period from 2006 to 2011. This study employed

Regression analysis to determine the impact of average collection period and average

payment period on gross operating profit taking current ratio, size of the firm, financial debt

ratio as control variables. The results indicate that there is a significant negative relationship

between average collection period and profitability. Positive relationship is observed between

average payment period and gross operating profit. The relationship between two control

variables viz; current ratio, financial debt ratio and gross operating profit indicate the

expected negative relationship whereas the firm size indicate unexpected negative

relationship which may be due to gaps in managerial performance.

G. Sekeroglu, M. Altan (2014) investigated as comparatively that the effect of inventory

management on the profitability of Turkish firms which operated in weaving industry,

eatables industry, wholesale and retail industry in between 20032012 years. Research data

consist of profitability ratios and inventory turnovers ratio calculated by using balance sheets

and income statements of firms which operated in Borsa Istanbul (BIST). In this research, the

relationship between inventories and profitability is investigated by using SPSS-20 software

with regression and correlation analysis. The results achieved from three industry

departments which exist in study interpreted as comparatively. Accordingly, it is determined

that there is a positive relationship between inventory management and profitability in

eatables industry. However, it was founded that there is no relationship between inventory

management and profitability in weaving industry and wholesale and retail industry.


7/12

7

Theoretical framework

Independent variable Dependent variable

Research hypothesis

H1: The number of days accounts receivable are outstanding has no significant impact on the

profitability of Pakistani Paper and Board companies.

H2: There is positive and significant relationship between average collection period and

ROE.

H3: The number of days inventory are held has no significant impact on the profitability of

Pakistani Paper and Board companies.

H4: The Inventory conversion ratio has positive impact on the profitability of Pakistani Paper

and Board companies.

Account receivable

turnover in Days

Average collection period

Inventory Conversion Ratio

Inventory Turnover in Days NET OPERATING

PROFIT

Cash Conversion Cycle


8/12

8

Research Methodology

Population and sample

Population of this study is total listed companies of Paper and Board industry in Karachi

stock exchange.

Data collection

Secondary data will be collected through through financial statements and URL of Karachi

stock exchange.

Data analysis

In order to analyze data SPSS software will be used. Descriptive statistics will be used to

calculate mean and standard deviation. Regression analysis is conducted to find out if there is

an association/ Relation between Inventory and Receivable Management on Profitability.


9/12

9

Measures of Profitability: According to Eljelly (2004), profitability is the ability to create

an excess of revenue over expenses in order to attract and hold investment capital. Four

useful measures of firms profitability are: the rate of return on firms assets (ROA), the rate

of return on firms equity (ROE), operating profit margin and net firm income. The ROA

measures the return to all firms assets and is often used as an overall index of profitability,

and the higher the value, the more profitable the firm. ROA is therefore an indicator of

managerial efficiency as it shows how the firms management converted the institutions

assets under its control into earnings (Falope and Ajilore, 2009).

The ROE measures the rate of return on the owners equity employed in the firm (Pandey,

2005). ROE indicates how well the firm has used the resources of owners. The operating

profit margin measures the returns to capital per naira of gross firm revenue. It focuses on the

per unit produced component of earned profit and the asset turnover ratio. The net income

comes directly on the income statement and it is calculated by matching firm revenue with

expenses incurred to create revenue, plus the gain or loss on the sale of firm capital assets

(Gitman, 2006).

Net Operating Profitability (NOP) which is a measure of Profitability of the firm is usedas dependant variable.

Average Collection Period (ACP) used as proxy for the Collection Policy is an

independent variable.

Inventory turnover in days (ITID) used as proxy for the Inventory Policy is also an

independent variable.

The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) used as a comprehensive measure of working

capital management is another independent variable

VARIABLE MEASUREMENTS

The following below are the measures pertaining Inventory management and firms

profitability:

No. of Days Inventory = (average Inventory/Net Sales) x 365

Firm Size = Natural Logarithm of Sales

Financial Debt Ratio = Total Debt/Total Assets

Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current liabilities

GOP = Operating Profit / Total Assets


10/12

10

Number of Days Inventory are held

Number of Days Accounts Receivable is outstanding (DAR)

References

Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1977), Estimatingnon response bias in mail surveys,

Journal of MarketingResearch, 14(3), pp. 396-402.

Bender, D. (1986), Financial impact of informationprocessing, Journal of Management

Information Systems, 3(2), pp. 22-32.

Boon-Itt, S. and Wong, C.Y. (2011), The moderating effects of technological and demand

uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery

performance, International Journal of PhysicalDistribution and Logistics Management,

41(3), pp. 253-276.

Boyer, K.K. (1998), Longitudinal linkages between intended and realized operations

strategies,International Journal ofOperations and Production Management,18(4), pp. 356-

373.

Boyer, K.K. (1999), Evolutionary patterns of flexible automation and performance: a

longitudinal study,Management Science, 45(6), pp. 824-842.

Boyer, K.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2002), Competitive priorities: investigating the need for

trade offs in operations strategy,Production and Operations Management, 11(1), pp. 9-20.


11/12

11

Boyer, K.K., Leong, G., Ward, P. and Krajewski, L. (1997), Unlocking the potential of

advanced manufacturing technologies,Journal of Operations Management, 15(4), pp. 331-

347.

Flynn, E .J. (1990), Empirical research methods in operations management, Journal of

OperationsManagement, 9(2), pp. 250-284.

Flynn, B.B., Huo, B. and Zhao, X. (2010), The impact of supply chain integration on

performance: a contingency and configuration approach, Journal of Operations

Management,

28(1), pp. 58-71.

Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with

unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research,18(1), pp.

29-50.

Germain, R. and Iyer, K.N.S. (2006), The interaction of internal and downstream

integration and its association with performance, Journal of Business Logistics , 27(2), p. 29.

Gimenez, C. (2004), Supply chain management implementation in the Spanish grocery

sector: an exploratory study, UPF Economics & Business Working Paper (No. 668),

Universitat Pomepu Fabra, Barcelona.


12/12

12

Gimenez, C . and Ventura, E. (2003), Supply chain management as a competitive

advantage in the Spanish grocery sector, International Journal of Logistics Management,

14(1), p. 77.

Van Hoek, R.I. and Mitchell, A.J. (2006), The challenge of internal misalignment,

International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal of Supply

Chain Management,9(3), pp. 269-81.

Wong, C. and Boon-itt, S. (2011), The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on

the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance, Journal of

Operations Management,29(6), p. 604.

Faris's Synopsis

Documents

Transcript of Faris's Synopsis