Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to...

52
Faculty In-Service Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012 October 10, 2012

description

Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Transcript of Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to...

Page 1: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Faculty In-ServiceFaculty In-ServiceOctober 10, 2012October 10, 2012

Page 2: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

The DataThe Data

Page 3: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Student CharacteristicsStudent Characteristics

Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.the state average.

Page 4: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Student CharacteristicsStudent Characteristics

Snapshot data from the month of October for Snapshot data from the month of October for each of the years listed.each of the years listed.

Page 5: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Student CharacteristicsStudent Characteristics

The 2012-2013 District average will increase as there The 2012-2013 District average will increase as there are approx. 20 students awaiting verification.are approx. 20 students awaiting verification.

Page 6: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Reading Cohort Data NeSA Reading Cohort Data Class of 2020 Class of 2020 (This year(This year’’s 5s 5thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 19% Boys Growth: 43%Girls Growth: 19% Boys Growth: 43%F/R Growth: 37% SPED Growth: 29%F/R Growth: 37% SPED Growth: 29%

Page 7: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Reading Cohort Data NeSA Reading Cohort Data Class of 2019 Class of 2019 (This year(This year’’s 6s 6thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 26% Boys Growth: 33%Girls Growth: 26% Boys Growth: 33%F/R Growth: 33% SPED Growth: 12%F/R Growth: 33% SPED Growth: 12%

Page 8: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Reading Cohort Data NeSA Reading Cohort Data Class of 2018 Class of 2018 (This year(This year’’s 7s 7thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 21% Boys Growth: 23%Girls Growth: 21% Boys Growth: 23%F/R Growth: 26% SPED Growth: 7%F/R Growth: 26% SPED Growth: 7%

Page 9: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Reading Cohort Data NeSA Reading Cohort Data Class of 2017 Class of 2017 (This year(This year’’s 8s 8thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 6% Boys Growth: 22%Girls Growth: 6% Boys Growth: 22%F/R Growth: 3% SPED Growth: 6%F/R Growth: 3% SPED Growth: 6%

Page 10: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Reading Cohort Data NeSA Reading Cohort Data Class of 2016 Class of 2016 (This year(This year’’s 9s 9thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 13% Boys Growth: 10%Girls Growth: 13% Boys Growth: 10%F/R Growth: 22% SPED Growth: 2%F/R Growth: 22% SPED Growth: 2%

Page 11: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Reading Cohort Data MAP Reading Cohort Data Class of 2020 Class of 2020 (This year(This year’’s 5s 5thth graders) graders)

Chart shows higher percentages in Chart shows higher percentages in the 3the 3rdrd and 4 and 4thth quartiles quartiles

Page 12: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Reading Cohort Data MAP Reading Cohort Data Class of 2019 Class of 2019 (this year(this year’’s 6s 6thth graders) graders)

Chart shows higher percentages in Chart shows higher percentages in the 3the 3rdrd and 4 and 4thth quartiles quartiles

Page 13: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Reading Cohort Data MAP Reading Cohort Data Class of 2018 Class of 2018 (this year(this year’’s 7s 7thth graders) graders)

Chart shows higher percentages in Chart shows higher percentages in the 3the 3rdrd and 4 and 4thth quartiles quartiles

Page 14: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Reading Cohort Data MAP Reading Cohort Data Class of 2017 Class of 2017 (this year(this year’’s 8s 8thth graders) graders)

Chart shows higher percentages in Chart shows higher percentages in the 3the 3rdrd and 4 and 4thth quartiles quartiles

Page 15: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Reading Cohort Data MAP Reading Cohort Data Class of 2016 Class of 2016 (this year(this year’’s 9s 9thth graders) graders)

88thth graders did not test in the spring graders did not test in the spring of 2012.of 2012.

Page 16: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Reading Cohort Data MAP Reading Cohort Data Class of 2015 Class of 2015 (this year(this year’’s 10s 10thth graders) graders)

Page 17: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

The DataThe Data

Page 18: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Math Cohort Data NeSA Math Cohort Data Class of 2020 Class of 2020 (this year(this year’’s 5s 5thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 17% Boys Growth: 41%Girls Growth: 17% Boys Growth: 41%F/R Growth: 34% SPED Growth: 27%F/R Growth: 34% SPED Growth: 27%

Page 19: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Math Cohort Data NeSA Math Cohort Data Class of 2019 Class of 2019 (this year(this year’’s 6s 6thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 23% Boys Growth: 29%Girls Growth: 23% Boys Growth: 29%F/R Growth: 25% SPED Growth: 1%F/R Growth: 25% SPED Growth: 1%

Page 20: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Math Cohort Data NeSA Math Cohort Data Class of 2018 Class of 2018 (this year(this year’’s 7s 7thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 18% Boys Growth: 36%Girls Growth: 18% Boys Growth: 36%F/R Growth: 20% SPED Growth: 15%F/R Growth: 20% SPED Growth: 15%

Page 21: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Math Cohort Data NeSA Math Cohort Data Class of 2017 Class of 2017 (this year(this year’’s 8s 8thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 22% Boys Growth: 7%Girls Growth: 22% Boys Growth: 7%F/R Growth: 3% SPED Growth: -9%F/R Growth: 3% SPED Growth: -9%

Page 22: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

NeSA Math Cohort Data NeSA Math Cohort Data Class of 2016 Class of 2016 (this year(this year’’s 9s 9thth graders) graders)

Girls Growth: 16% Boys Growth: 6%Girls Growth: 16% Boys Growth: 6%F/R Growth: 16% SPED Growth: 19%F/R Growth: 16% SPED Growth: 19%

Page 23: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Math Cohort Data MAP Math Cohort Data Class of 2020 Class of 2020 (this year(this year’’s 5s 5thth graders) graders)

Page 24: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Math Cohort Data MAP Math Cohort Data Class of 2019 Class of 2019 (this year(this year’’s 6s 6thth graders) graders)

Page 25: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Math Cohort Data MAP Math Cohort Data Class of 2018 Class of 2018 (this year(this year’’s 7s 7thth graders) graders)

Page 26: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Math Cohort Data MAP Math Cohort Data Class of 2017 Class of 2017 (this year(this year’’s 8s 8thth graders) graders)

Page 27: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Math Cohort Data MAP Math Cohort Data Class of 2016 Class of 2016 (this year(this year’’s 9s 9thth graders) graders)

88thth graders did not test in the spring graders did not test in the spring of 2012of 2012

Page 28: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

MAP Math Cohort Data MAP Math Cohort Data Class of 2015 Class of 2015 (this year(this year’’s 10s 10thth graders) graders)

Page 29: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

The DataThe Data

Page 30: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

ACT DataACT Data

Page 31: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

ACT DataACT Data

Page 32: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

The Positive HighlightsThe Positive Highlights Cohort data is very positive – Cohort data is very positive –

scores are improving.scores are improving. 2012 NeSA scores are showing 2012 NeSA scores are showing

improvement in the improvement in the disaggregated areas – Male, disaggregated areas – Male, Female, Free/Reduced Lunch and Female, Free/Reduced Lunch and SPED.SPED.

Page 33: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

New District GoalsNew District Goals All students will improve reading

comprehension across the curriculum. All students will improve vocabulary

across the curriculum All students will improve math skills in

the area of number sense. All students will improve math skills in

the area of data analysis/probability.

Page 34: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Formative and Formative and Summative Summative AssessmentsAssessments

C4LCourse/Curriculum

AssessmentsMAPDIBELSNeSA

Page 35: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Where do Where do we go we go from from here????here????

Page 36: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

SMART SMART GOALSGOALS

What are they?What are they?Why use them?Why use them?How do you How do you write them? write them?

Page 37: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

What Are SMART GOALS?

S pecific, strategic

M easurableA ttainableR esults-

orientedT ime-bound

Page 38: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Goal Writing:101Goal Writing:101 SSpecific: The outcome or end result is pecific: The outcome or end result is

very clear to me and all audiences.very clear to me and all audiences. MMeasurable: You can tell if you have easurable: You can tell if you have

achieved your goal because you can achieved your goal because you can count it or see it.count it or see it.

AAttainable: While achieving the outcome ttainable: While achieving the outcome might be a challenge, it is possible with might be a challenge, it is possible with the current team and resources.the current team and resources.

RResults-Oriented: The goal is inline with esults-Oriented: The goal is inline with the results expected by the district CSIP, the results expected by the district CSIP, APR, Building goals and plans.APR, Building goals and plans.

TTime bound: A specific date has been ime bound: A specific date has been set by which to achieve the goal.set by which to achieve the goal.

Page 39: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

Why SMART Why SMART Goals?Goals?

Goals are something that you want Goals are something that you want to achieve in the futureto achieve in the future

SMART goals assist in SMART goals assist in ““getting getting focusedfocused”” on what to focus efforts on what to focus efforts towardtoward

SMART goals help define exactly SMART goals help define exactly what the what the ““future statefuture state”” looks like looks like and how it will be measured and how it will be measured

SMART goals show others how SMART goals show others how their work their work ““alignsaligns”” and relates to and relates to the focus of the schoolthe focus of the school

Page 40: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

How To Write SMART How To Write SMART GoalsGoals

Identify the Identify the ““big, hairy audacious, big, hairy audacious, critical-fewcritical-few”” goals that need to be goals that need to be worked on worked on (The Most Important Ones!)(The Most Important Ones!)– Consult the data!Consult the data!– What are the greatest areas in need of What are the greatest areas in need of

improvement?improvement? Dig deep and get specific Dig deep and get specific (disaggregate!)(disaggregate!) If all you did was spend time on the If all you did was spend time on the

identified SMART goals, would the time identified SMART goals, would the time be well-spent? be well-spent?

Page 41: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

SMART GOALS Examples

Page 42: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

SMART GoalsSMART GoalsExamplesExamples

Within the next 2 years, reduce by 50% the number Within the next 2 years, reduce by 50% the number of students needing remedial reading assistance of students needing remedial reading assistance after 9th grade.after 9th grade.

Increase the percentage of students in the proficient Increase the percentage of students in the proficient and above proficient levels in informative writing and above proficient levels in informative writing skills.skills.

Develop studentsDevelop students’’ scientific inquiry skills and scientific inquiry skills and understanding of their applications.understanding of their applications.

Increase automaticity of addition and subtraction Increase automaticity of addition and subtraction math facts by 20% within a 6-month period.math facts by 20% within a 6-month period.

Reduce from 30% to 5% the percent of students Reduce from 30% to 5% the percent of students receiving receiving ““failurefailure”” grades in algebra. grades in algebra.

Page 43: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

SMART Goals SMART Goals ExamplesExamples

60% of 8th graders will score at or above state 60% of 8th graders will score at or above state average on the reading component of the state test.average on the reading component of the state test.

Reduce fighting from 46% to less than 10% by Reduce fighting from 46% to less than 10% by spring break.spring break.

Improve all studentsImprove all students’’ application of scientific inquiry application of scientific inquiry strategies to diverse investigative questions strategies to diverse investigative questions demonstrated on the district performance demonstrated on the district performance assessment.assessment.

Increase the number of students in the intermediate Increase the number of students in the intermediate and high achievement levels in reading and high achievement levels in reading comprehension by at least 4% in grades 4, 8, and comprehension by at least 4% in grades 4, 8, and 11.11.

Page 44: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.

ItIt’’s on Google Docs!s on Google Docs!

Page 45: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.
Page 46: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.
Page 47: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.
Page 48: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.
Page 49: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.
Page 50: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.
Page 51: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.
Page 52: Faculty In-Service October 10, 2012. The Data Student Characteristics Fairbury Schools continue to be higher than the state average.