Fact sheet i4D - luchtvaartfeiten.nl · FACT SHEET i4D Modernizing the European Air Traffic...
Transcript of Fact sheet i4D - luchtvaartfeiten.nl · FACT SHEET i4D Modernizing the European Air Traffic...
-
FACT SHEET i4D Modernizing the European Air Traffic Management system
-
Fact sheet i4D
Introduction “The European Commission has acted to speed up the reform of Europe's air traffic control system. The Commission says it is looking to head off a capacity crunch as the number of flights is forecast to increase by 50% over the next 10-‐20 years. Inefficiencies in Europe's fragmented airspace bring extra costs of close to EUR 5 billion each year to airlines and their customers. They add 42 kilometres to the distance of an average flight forcing aircraft to burn more fuel, generate more emissions, pay more in costly user charges and suffer greater delays. The United States controls the same amount of airspace, with more traffic, at almost half the cost.” 1 This article by EU business captures the problems that are experienced by European airspace user due to fragmentation in the European Airspace. The European Commission has launched the Single European Sky to unify the European airspace and modernize the air traffic management system. SESAR is the technological dimension and has set up nearly 300 research and development projects to realize modernization. This fact sheet is about initial 4D, one of SESAR’s solutions. First the problems that are faced today are described and the objectives set by SESAR to reduce these problems. Then the operation and technical requirements of initial 4D are described and concluded in the implementation plans. A Dutch summary can be found at the end of this fact sheet.
Why SESAR? The first air traffic control arose nearly a century ago from the need to provide separation between aircraft and allow safe air travel, this is still the most important factor of the Air Traffic Management (ATM) system that we know today.2 The current system however, is not able to provide the efficiency that is required by the airspace users and EU. Reason for this is the fragmented European Airspace and inefficiencies in the system. This results in insufficient capacity, delays, inefficient routing and thus has negative effects on costs and the environment.3 On top of this the European air traffic is expected to grow from 9.5 million flights annually to 17 million in 2030, this will only add to the problems that ATM is already facing. Without a change to the ATM systems, the problems are expected to keep increasing.4
What is SESAR? The European Commission (EC) launched the Single European Sky (SES) initiative to reform the ATM system at a European level. Their objectives for 2020 and beyond compared to 2005 are: • A three-‐fold increase in capacity • Improve safety by a factor or 10 • Reduce environmental impact of flights by 10% • Reduce costs by 50% per flight
In 2007 the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) was established as the technological dimension of SES by the EC and EUROCONTROL. They develop technologies and operational concepts that will modernise the European ATM system. The ATM Master Plan5 provides roadmaps for stakeholders that connect SESAR’s research and development projects with deployment. Showing them the essential operational and technological changes to meet the SES objectives. There are six key features that are essential to reaching the SESAR’s goals are:
-
Fact sheet i4D
• Moving from Airspace to 4D Trajectory Management • Traffic Synchronisation • Network Collaborative Management and Dynamic / Capacity Balancing • SWIM • Airport Integration and Throughput • Conflict Management and Automation SESAR has three views. The performance view shows the high-‐level goals for improving the Key Performance Areas: Capacity, cost-‐efficiency, environment and safety. The deployment view provides the roadmaps with four steps for implementations of the six key features: the deployment baseline, step 1 time-‐based operations, step 2 trajectory based operations and step 3 performance based operations. The business view captures the financial requirements for stakeholders and contains a high-‐level analyses of the costs of SESAR. SESAR’s objectives to be reached with the deployment of step 1 are: • Increase capacity by 27% • 40% reduction in accident risk per flight hours • Reduce environmental impact of flights by 10% • Reduce costs by 6% per flight. Step 1 is the first step toward implementation of the concepts that SESAR made for 2020 and focusses on flight efficiency, predictability and environment, this is where i4D will be deployed. I4D falls under the key performance area traffic synchronisation. Deployment of i4D is scheduled for 2020 according to the 2012 Master Plan. Full 4D capability falls under moving from Airspace to 4D Trajectory Management in step 2, deployment dates are yet to be determined.
i4D general system description Initial 4D, also called i4D, is one of the technologies being developed to attribute to the key objectives that are set by SESAR.5 The main goal of i4D is to create more predictability and controllability about the position of aircraft.6 I4D is a concept where a 3-‐dimentional point in space (latitude, longitude and altitude) is added with a time constraint, hence the 4 dimensions. This enables controllers to set a time slot long in advance for aircraft to be at a Merging Point (MP), in order to sequence traffic for arrival. A MP is a point is space where multiple aircraft converge with the same destination.
A typical MP could be placed at an Initial Approach Fix (IAF) of an instrument approach. In return the aircraft is allowed to fly to this MP without vectors or speed changes. This should eventually be beneficial to both flight time and fuel cost.
-
Fact sheet i4D
“I4D will be the first step toward full 4D trajectories. I4D in comparison to full 4D will only be able to provide a single point with a time constraint instead of multiple points with time constraints.” Steps toward i4D service7 There are seven steps before an i4D service can be established. At first an achievable time constraint must be chosen, which will be done with continuously sharing information between air and ground. For example a controller might want an aircraft to be at the MP at a time slot that is impossible to achieve or very uneconomical. It is therefore of main importance that the efficient and reliable sharing of information can be realized. The airborne 4D route of the aircraft is first downlinked to the controller and compared to the 4D ground route generated by a ground station. The airborne trajectory is calculated by the Flight Management System (FMS) in the aircraft and will take into account operational information such as cost index, load and meteorological information. The ground route will take the flight plan received based on the flight plan filled by the pilot before departure and adds information to it such as restricted areas, hand over condition between controllers and optimization of traffic flow. This might make the airborne trajectory different than the ground trajectory. If there are any discrepancies between the air and ground 4D route the controller adjusts the desired route, updates the ground system if necessary, and communicates it back to the flight crew via voice or data link communication. The flight crew will now implement the route into the FMS. The second step will be the ground-‐to-‐ground communication about the 3D trajectory. This step is to make sure that there is a common view between ground units involved that can be used as a basis in starting coordinating the downlinked trajectory. For most of the flights this step is a reconfirmation of the flight plan trajectory, although if there are any
discrepancies between ground systems they need to be resolved. This is to ensure a trajectory that can be accepted by all ground parties involved. This third step is the negotiation of the 3D trajectory between ground and air. The agreed ground trajectory will be uplinked to the aircraft and the flight crew will assess if there are any implications. If the trajectory is rejected the 4D trajectory service is terminated and the flight will continue as a normal non-‐4D flight, solving problems with voice communication and tactical control instructions. In normal cases there will only be minor changes to the trajectory by the ground system and the flight crew will agree with the trajectory. The trajectory will now be uplinked to the aircraft and the FMS will calculate an estimated min/max time for a fix on the agreed route to downlink back to the ground. The min/max times are used to generate a time constraint by the ground system that is achievable by the aircraft. During step four the ground system will negotiate a time constraint for the fix. This will be calculated by a ground system called Arrival Manager (AMAN). An AMAN system will calculate times for aircraft to be at the MP to optimize the sequence into an airport. This timeslot will be based on the downlinked information on what is actual possible for the aircraft to achieve.
-
Fact sheet i4D
At step five the ground system negotiates the time constraint with the aircraft. Because the time constraint is derived from the aircrafts own estimated min/max it is assumed that the time constraint will be acceptable. If the time constraint is not accepted the ground system will negotiate a different constraint with the flight crew or the service can be terminated. If the time slot is accepted by the flight crew, it is inserted in the FMS and the aircraft speed is automatically managed to comply with the time slot over the MP. During step six the flight will continue according to its agreed trajectory and time constraints while ATC is clearing the aircraft for the portion of the flight that lays in their area of responsibility. Intervention of controllers will be held to a minimum, only in cases such as separation or weather the trajectory will be modified. When the aircraft can still meet its constraint after a modification of the trajectory the service is continued. When it is not possible for the aircraft to make the constraint after a modification of the trajectory a warning will be given to the flight crew and the controller. A new trajectory is downlinked and a new negotiation progress of a time constraint can be necessary. At step seven the aircraft reached the waypoint at the agreed time constraint. This can result in a termination of the service or a new negotiation for a new time constraint if this is necessary.
For efficient use of i4D, a uniform system with agreed standards for every user is required. The system will only generate benefits when there is an efficient sharing of the trajectory and it will thus be necessary to have the appropriate communication systems on the ground as well as in the air. System Wide Information Management (SWIM) network will be of much importance to the system, because i4D relies on the efficient sharing of information. The benefit of the i4D system will increase with increasing equipped aircraft in the area where the service is provided.8
Components and capability requirements The components needed to fulfil to the system requirements can be divided into airborne and ground based equipment9. Airborne: • Enhanced FMS: to calculate the trajectory and a time-‐keeping
functionality to provide accurate delivery of the flight over the metering fix.
• Controller Pilot Data link Connection (CPDLC): The aircraft needs to be able to support data link to receive route clearances with time, speed and vertical constrains. Also the aircraft needs to be able to reply to a time slot.
• Automatic Dependence surveillance-‐Contract (ADS-‐C): required to downlink the trajectory and an achievable time at a fix requested by controllers.
• Control Display Unit (CDU): It will display the data link messages to the flight crew and provides the means to answer to the clearances (WILCO, UNABLE and reject).
Ground based: • Data link Front-‐End Processor (DLFEP): this will be responsible for data
link exchanges such as ADS-‐C and CPDLC. It will include Network monitoring, communication establishment, contracts and messages uplinks and reception of downlinked data as well as semantic checks and translation of the data from/to the internal ground systems format.
-
Fact sheet i4D
• Human Machine Interface (HMI): displays the radar image enriched by the ground and airborne flight plan data. It will provide an interface to the controllers to input clearances and manage the flight.
• Flight Data Processing System (FDPS): will compute the ground trajectory and send flight plan information to a human machine interface where it can be adjusted and updated with current information. It will provide ADS-‐C data to the human machine interface and computes the 2D discrepancy indicator. It will link controllers to exchange online messages and it will link flight plans to radar data.
• AMAN computes and displays the arrival sequence in the airport surroundings. And provides means for the approach controllers to manually update the sequence.
Implementation Implementation of i4D will be a process involving multiple parties who all have different interests, financial situations and operations. Only when the deployment of SESAR is timely, synchronized and coordinated, in accordance with the Master Plan, the performance objectives and benefits from the ATM modernization will be achieved.10 This will require SESAR to fully deliver systems from concept to implementation and on the other hand involve all the relevant stakeholders to deploy a new ATM system. For this purpose the EC adopted the Implementing Regulation (The Regulation) setting up an EU framework supporting the implementation of the Master Plan. The Regulation defines the following framework to support SESAR deployment: • Common Projects • Governance Mechanisms • The deployment Programme • Implementation projects • Target Incentives The common projects include those ATM Functionalities (AFs) that will achieve the essential operational changes defined in the Master Plan. The AFs criteria to be introduced in common projects are: They contribute to
essential operational changes, they are mature for deployment and there is a need for synchronized. The EC is setting up the first Common Project, referred to as the Pilot Common Project (PCP). The PCP contains six AFs, including i4D. The PCP is a special Common Project not just because it is the first one but also because it activates a new process for stakeholders and the Commission to work together. The PCP includes the first group of technical and/or operational changes to be implemented between 2014-‐2024. Governance Mechanisms forces a requirement for all EU civil and military operational stakeholders, such as ANSPs, airport operators and airspace users, to deploy the AFs in a specific region and within a determined timeframe. It also applies to other bodies such as the Network Manager, the SESAR JU, EASA, European Standardisation Organisations and Eurocae.
Common project setup sequence
EC
EC
-
Fact sheet i4D
PCP will be implemented according to the Deployment Programme and the Deployment manager is responsible for the timely and synchronized implementation. I4D will be deployed in all ATS-‐units that provide air traffic services in the ICAO EUR-‐region airspace.11
Air traffic services providers and the Network manager are required to make sure that i4D is available as from 1 January 2025. The deployment manager shall develop a strategy, which shall include incentives, to make sure that at least 20% of all aircraft active in airspace of European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) countries and in the ICAO EUR region corresponding to at least 45% of flights operating in those countries, are equipped with the capability to downlink aircraft trajectories using ADS-‐C EPP as from 1 January 2026.
The deployment of i4D must be monitored carefully because a delayed implementation could have a potential network performance impact in a wide area involving multiple stakeholders. The consequences could be that performance objectives are not met and there will be a negative impact on the EU economy, employment, mobility and environment.12
Deployment of i4D from a technical perspective is synchronized so the system and service delivery changes are ensured to meet the performance objectives. Synchronization shall involve all ANSPs, the Network Manager and airspace users (air-‐ground synchronization need). At last global synchronization and consistency is preferred, in order to ensure best economic efficiency and interoperability for airspace users. This will be achieved through the cooperative arrangements in the Memorandum of Cooperation in civil aviation research and development concluded between the United States of America and the EU.13
Glossary • Automatic Dependence surveillance-‐Contract (ADS-‐C): Is a surveillance
technique that works via a data link. ADS-‐C is a system based on a contract between controllers and an aircraft. The contract can be a demand contract, a periodic contract, an event contract and/or an emergency contract.
• ATM Functionalities (AFs): Essential operational functionalities for implementation.
• Arrival Manager (AMAN): AMAN is a system that sequences aircraft into an airport, taking into account; airspace state, wake turbulence, aircraft capability and user preference. This is done by assigning aircraft a slot time to arrive over a merging point. This must increase airport flow and must reduce holding times.
• Control Display Unit (CDU): Provides the interface to access the flight management system.
• Controller Pilot Data link Connection (CPDLC): CPDLC is a method that is used to communicate between pilots and air traffic controllers via a data link system.
• Data link Front-‐End Processor (DLFEP): Provides a road between controllers and data link equipped aircraft. It enables seamless communication between different types of data link systems, creating interoperability.
-
Fact sheet i4D
• European Commission (EC): is the executive body of the European Union responsible for proposing legislation, implementing decisions, upholding the EU treaties and managing the day-‐to-‐day business of the EU.
• European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC): promotes the continued development of a safe, efficient and sustainable European air transport system.
• Flight Data Processing System (FDPS): Provides real time flight information for air traffic controllers and provides automated co-‐ordination between air traffic controllers.
• Flight Management System (FMS): A FMS is part of the aircrafts avionics. A FMS is a computer system that automates a large variety of tasks, to reduce the workload on the flight crew.
• Human Machine Interface (HMI): Provides a way for the flight crew to interact with automation systems.
• Initial Approach Fix (IAF): is the point where the initial approach segment of an instrument approach begins.
• Merging Point (MP): A MP is a fix where aircraft converge for a common destination.
• Pilot Common Project (PCP): The first common project, including i4D. • Single European Sky (SES): is a European Commission initiative by which
the design, management and regulation of airspace will be coordinated throughout the European Union.
• Stakeholders: Airspace users, air navigation service providers, airport operators, military and the network manager.
• System Wide Information Management (SWIM) is the intranet of air traffic management and is of great importance to the success of i4D. The large exchange of information nowadays is very difficult because systems are often made with one specific goal and they all have their own custom protocols. SWIM tries to make information interchange available between all providers and users of air traffic management information. They will share aeronautical, airport, flight, meteorology, surveillance, air traffic flow, capacity and demand information. SWIM tries to provide a safe platform to give the right information to the right
people at the right time. The goals of SWIM are to increase ATM efficiency and eventually reduce ATM costs. This will mainly be done by creating a uniform system with standards on the exchange of information.
References 1 http://www.eubusiness.com/topics/airlines/single-‐sky-‐3/ EUBusiness -‐ Single Sky -‐ unblocking congestion in Europe's airspace Published 11-‐06-‐2013
2 Cook, Andrew. European Air Traffic Management -‐ Principles, Practice and Research. Bur-‐lington: Ashgate. 2007 3 http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/single_european_sky/ European Commission – Single European Sky 02-‐12-‐2014 4 http://www.sesarju.eu/discover-‐sesar/why-‐sesar Why SESAR? 02-‐12-‐2014 5 SESAR. European ATM Master Plan. 2nd edition, October 2012 6 http://www.sesarju.eu/newsroom/all-‐news/4d-‐flights-‐make-‐air-‐travel-‐even-‐more-‐predictable 4D flights make air travel even more predictable 03-‐12-‐2014
-
Fact sheet i4D
7 EUROCONTROL. Initial 4D-‐4D Trajectory Data Link (4DTRAD) Concept of Operations 8 EUROCONTROL. I4D test flight heralds new era in air traffic management 9 Mutuel, Laurence H. -‐ Initial 4D Trajectory Management Concept Evaluation 10 http://www.sesarju.eu/innovation-‐solution/deploying-‐sesar SESAR deployment: delivering operational changes 03-‐12-‐2014 11 European Commission. SESAR deployment -‐ Targeted stakeholder Consultation. December 2013 12 http://eur-‐lex.europa.eu/legal-‐content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2014.190.01.0019.01.ENG European Union Law 03-‐12-‐2014 13 http://eur-‐lex.europa.eu/legal-‐content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011PC0043 European Law 03-‐12-‐201
Front page image: www.amazing-‐aviation.com
Image references (top to bottom, left to right)
1. http://www.sesarju.eu/ 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNJxX-‐a8rcc 3. EUROCONTROL. Initial 4D-‐4D Trajectory Data Link (4DTRAD) Concept of
Operations 4. EUROCONTROL. Initial 4D-‐4D Trajectory Data Link (4DTRAD) Concept of
Operations 5. https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/member-‐states
6. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/consultations/doc/2014-‐01-‐31-‐sesar/consultation-‐paper.pdf
Dutch Summary De Europese Commissie heeft het project Single European Sky opgericht om het gefragmenteerde Europese Luchtruim te verenigen en het Air Traffic Management systeem te moderniseren. Hier is behoefte aan door de huidige problemen met capaciteit en inefficiëntie die leiden tot hoge kosten en milieu belasting.3 Deze problemen zullen groter worden met de verwachtte groei van 9.5 miljoen vluchten per jaar naar 17 miljoen in 2030.4 SESAR is de technologische dimensie die technologieën en operationele concepten ontwikkelt om modernisatie te realiseren en daarmee capaciteit, veiligheid, kostenefficiëntie en milieubelasting te verbeteren. Een van de oplossingen is initial 4D (i4D).5
I4D is een van de technologieën die op het moment worden ontwikkeld om de hoofdoelen van SESAR te bereiken.5 I4D is een concept waaraan een 3-‐dimensionaal punt een tijdsrestrictie wordt toegevoegd, waardoor er een
-
Fact sheet i4D
4-‐dimensionaal punt ontstaat. I4D operaties maken lang van te voren een volgorde van vliegtuigen die convergeren op een merging point. Na coördinatie tussen grondsystemen en het vliegtuig, krijgt elk vliegtuig een tijdslot voor zijn aankomst op een merging point. Daar staat tegenover dat het vliegtuig toestemming krijgt om naar dit punt te vliegen zonder vector instructies van controllers. Dit zal uiteindelijk moeten leiden tot een reductie in vluchttijden en brandstof kosten.7 Om de implementatie van i4D gesynchroniseerd en zonder vertraging te laten gebeuren, heeft de Europese Commissie een raamwerk opgesteld, genaamd Implementing Regulation. Dit raamwerk bestaat uit 5 stappen die volledige implementatie van een groep essentiële ATM functies ondersteunen. De eerste stap zijn de Common Projects en i4D zit in het Pilot Common Project. Het Pilot Common Project implementeert de eerste groep ATM functies en activeert een nieuw proces voor belanghebbenden en de Europese Commissie om samen te werken. De tweede stap zijn de zogenaamde Governance Mechanisms, die belanghebbenden dwingen ATM functies te implementeren binnen een bepaalde regio en tijdsframe. Hoe de ATM functies geïmplementeerd moeten worden, is bepaald binnen het Deployment Programme en de Deployment Manager draagt de verantwoordelijkheid hiervoor. Deze strategie, die stimulansen bevat, is verplicht om te zorgen dat vanaf 1 januari 2026 minimaal 20% van alle vliegtuigen actief in het ECAC (European Civil Aviation Conference) luchtruim en 45% van alle vluchten opererende binnen landen van de ICAO EUR regio, zijn uitgevoerd met het vermogen om vlucht trajecten met ADS-‐C EPP uit te voeren. De luchtverkeersleiding en de netwerkmanager zijn verplicht om ervoor te zorgen dat i4D beschikbaar is vanaf 1 januari 2025.10
Dit is een uitgave van: Luchtvaartfeiten.nl
Auteurs: Pamela Bakhuis, Roderik de Jong and Bastian Musters
Eindredactie: Drs. Joris Vlaming, Dr. ir. Robert Jan de Boer en Drs. Geert Boosten
Overnemen van teksten is toegestaan. Graag bij citeren vermelden: ‘Luchtvaartfeiten.nl (2014), Fact sheet i4D, www.luchtvaartfeiten.nl’
Luchtvaartfeiten.nl is een initiatief van de HvA Aviation Academy. Studenten en docenten delen kennis met politiek en publiek, om te zorgen voor een discussie op basis van feiten.
December 2014