Fabrizio_capstone
-
Upload
sr320 -
Category
Technology
-
view
686 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Fabrizio_capstone
Anna Fabrizio
3/9/10
University of Washington
School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences
Chemotaxis and foraging behavior in Octopus rubescens
Octopus physiology
• octopuses are known to have well developed vision, often used for hunting
• many octopuses live in habitats where vision is compromised
• many octopuses prey on organisms that don’t move
• octopus suckers are used for sensing “taste”
• most sensitive at the tips of arms
Octopus foraging behaviors
• 2 primary foraging behaviors:• Poke/grope• Web-over
• Both are primarily tactile in nature, but dependent on visual range
(Forsythe and Hanlon, 1995)
Web-over
Web-over
Web-over
Web-over
Octopus chemotaxis
• little research done on distance chemotaxis in octopuses
• Chase and Wells (1986)
• Blind octopuses responded to and were able to sense the general direction of chemicals in the water
• Lee (1992)
• Octopuses in Y-maze responded to specific chemical direction
• research has been done on tactile/taste discrimination by octopuses (Wells 1962)
Objective
• to expand on previous chemotaxis studies by analyzing octopus reaction to live prey
• Octopus rubescens has not been used for chemotaxis studies in the past
Behavioral experiments
Experimental tank set-up
T-wall
boxes
barrier wall
Behavioral experiments
Results
• 19 trials performed: 8 blind, 11 visual
• 1 blind trial resulted in a choice (crab)
• 6 visual trials resulted in a choice
• all chose the crab
• Behavior observations
• more response to crabs during visual trials
• color change, active motion
What does this mean?
• Can we confidently determine that octopuses CAN use distance chemotaxis from previous studies done with chemicals alone?
• Natural foraging behaviors show little evidence for the use of distance chemotaxis
• But what about circumstances that compromise vision?
Stressed out crabs
• During trials, crabs also exhibited different kinds of behavior
• when crabs could see the octopus, they held very still but were obviously in distress
• Do octopuses respond more frequently to stressed crabs than non-stressed crabs?
• Is there a physiological difference between stressed/non-stressed crabs?
Prey analysis – Hemigrapsus oregonensis
• Purpose: analyze shore crab RNA/protein to see if they express something that octopuses would respond to
• Techniques:
• SDS/PAGE
• PCR
• Specifically looking at stressed vs non-stressed
• stressed, immersed crabs excrete excessive ammonia, waste, carbon dioxide
Procedure
Protein analysis
• protein fixation and extraction from gill tissues
• SDS-PAGE gel
C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6
ResultsGenetic analysis
• RNA fixation and extraction from gill tissues
• reverse transcription -> cDNA
• 4 primers, 3 genes – Carcinus maenas:
• CHH and CHH precursor 6: hormone expressed under stress
• Metallothionein: cysteine-rich protein that helps reduce oxidative stress
• Na+/K+ - ATPase: enzyme that helps regulate ammonia excretion
Genetic analysis
• further study into the significance of stress on prey and the ability of octopuses to find them
• more extensive research on distance chemotaxis with live prey
Future possibilities
Acknowledgments
Steven Roberts, Sam White, Mackenzie Gavery
Tim Carpenter, Kathryn Kegel
- Roberts lab
- Seattle Aquarium