F2 sat workshop f2s summit jan2015
18
Research, Evaluation, & Visioning Claire Berezowitz, University of WisconsinMadison Andrea Bontrager Yoder, University of WisconsinMadison Beth Hanna, Community GroundWorks Wisconsin Farm to School Summit Thursday, January 29, 2015 Wisconsin Rapids, WI
-
Upload
wi-f2s-summit -
Category
Education
-
view
71 -
download
0
Transcript of F2 sat workshop f2s summit jan2015
Research, Evaluation, & Visioning Claire Berezowitz, University of Wisconsin-‐Madison Andrea Bontrager Yoder, University of Wisconsin-‐Madison Beth Hanna, Community GroundWorks
Wisconsin Farm to School Summit Thursday, January 29, 2015 Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Who is here today?
JEOPARDY GAME!
jeopardylabs.com/play/wisconsin-‐farm-‐to-‐school
FARM TO SCHOOL ACTIVITY TRACKER
Project History
Why track program activity? • Common language • Common quanOficaOon
• Compare between schools • Track development within
school across Ome
What is “Comprehensive” F2S? • Describe tool: • Four domains:
• Variety • Frequency • Minutes
Engagement acOviOes
School gardens
NutriOon, agriculture educaOon
Local foods in school meals
FARM TO SCHOOL ACTIVITY TRACKER
Audience parOcipaOon!
Does it work? • Monthly acOvity reports, 2010-‐2011 • Enter into AcOvity Tracker • Program managers score (1-‐10) each site
• Correlate domain scores with expert scores
• Three months of acOvity data, Fall 2013 • 5 raters enter into AcOvity Tracker – assess for inter-‐rater reliability according to: • Same entries?
• Same domain-‐level scores?
Domain Scores correlate with Expert Scores Predictor Spearman Rank
Correla=on Coefficient (r)
Procurement: Variety 0.63***
Procurement: Frequency 0.71***
Classroom: Number of lessons 0.45**
Classroom: Number of minutes 0.23
Engagement: Number of ac=vi=es 0.71***
Garden: Number of visits 0.42**
Garden: Number of minutes data not collected
*** p<.0001 ** p<.001 * p<.05
BeneTits of tracking F2S activity • Common language • Common quanOficaOon
• Compare between schools • Track development within
school across Ome
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ACTIVITY Let’s move around!
Wrap up • QuesOons/comments? • How can we move F2S evaluaOon prioriOes forward in Wisconsin?
• Other evaluaOon tools: • See Wisconsin F2S Toolkit:
hip://www.cias.wisc.edu/toolkits/
Contact information • Claire Berezowitz • [email protected]
• Andrea Bontrager Yoder • [email protected], [email protected]
• Beth Hanna • [email protected]
Student Outcomes
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 1 ≥2 % of Trays
Percent of Trays with no FV disappearance
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 1 ≥2
% of Trays
Percent of Trays with no FV items
Fall 2010
May 2011 ***
*** ***
*** *
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Percent of trays with no FV items, 2010-‐2011
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Percent of trays with no FV consumed, 2010-‐2011
Fall 2010 Spring 2011
Domain Scores correlate with Student Outcomes
*** p<.0001 ** p<.001 * p<.05
• Correlates with improvements in Knowledge scores: • School Meals: Source, Frequency
• Correlates with improvements in percent of students with no FV consumed: • School Meals: Source, Variety
• Classroom Educa<on: Number of lessons
• Engagement Ac<vi<es: Number of ac<vi<es
• Garden Ac<vi<es: Number of ac<vi<es
