F IMAP at FNAL Jack Schmidt FNAL Disgruntled Postmaster Hepix April, 1999.
-
Upload
della-moody -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of F IMAP at FNAL Jack Schmidt FNAL Disgruntled Postmaster Hepix April, 1999.
f
IMAP at FNAL
Jack Schmidt
FNAL Disgruntled Postmaster
Hepix April, 1999
f
Initial Design (low cost)
SoftwareNetscape Messenger for NT
HardwareDual 200MHz Pentium Pro with 192Mb of memoryServer software and mail files located on a 20GB
Software RAID 5 disk array Identical computer system available as hot backup
f
Problems Performance
Delays accessing user’s InboxDelays foldering mailDelays in mail delivery
Quotasshared messages
problems restoring after disk loss
no warning mechanisms
f
Problems (cont) Misc-
Corrupted spool area Only on high activity days
ForwardingNo tools for diagnosing problemsPoor support from Netscape
f
Solutions (?) Performance
Brought 2nd server on line faster controllers and disks
RAID 1 instead of RAID 5 still software RAID
separate User storage from Mail server software Disk DefragmentationBalance users across disks.Limit users to ~ 600 per current server configurationStop and Restart service nightly
f
Solutions (?) Quotas
disable shared messageswrote warning programmodified user WEB interface to reflect quota
information Misc
Applied NT4 SP4 Removed user’s ability to set forwarding
f
Tools Perl scripts for:
adding usersmoving usersquota management
warning messages qouta available on User web page
connected usersuser activity (who gets all that mail?)
Freeware program examines threads PMDF software for moving users between servers mailstone program for load testing
Just started working with this!
f
Client Issues Early versions of Netscape poorly written User education
keep folders and Inbox smallstick with one client
Different errors for same problem. Netscape problems with corrupted mail. Outgoing SMTP server incorrectly set. Cache corruption. Need to cleanup in both
Netscape and Outlook Express
f
Sharing the Blame Us
Initial system designShould have spoke with other sitesTried being cutting edgeAssumed it would be as easy to manage as our pop server
Netscape poor supportpoor design- separate file for each messagepoor documentationsome things work differently than expected
f
Immediate Future IMAPserver1 652 users, 318 active IMAPserver2 388 users, 167 active 24% of mail inbound through our gateway is for
IMAP! 36% of data transferred through our gateway is
for IMAP! Need to shut off VAXes at D0 & CDF
Begin move in June, done by September Finish moving Quickmail users
f
Immediate Future Continue with Netscape software Buy true NT server:
4 processors 2GB memory multiple busses high-speed RAID controllers Use RAID 0+1 high-speed disks
f
Central Mail Server Central mail systems for all users to read mail Cluster technology -allows system maintenance
with no/little effect to the user Waiting to see what Sun/Netscape offers
SIMS looks promising Possible blackbox solution?
www.mirapoint.com