Eyewitness Misidentifications and Wrongful Convictions
description
Transcript of Eyewitness Misidentifications and Wrongful Convictions
Eyewitness Misidentifications and Wrongful Convictions
Brandon L. Garrett
Professor of Law
University of Virginia School of Law
2
Brandon L. Garrett
Convicting the Innocent
Where Criminal
Prosecutions Go Wrong
(Harvard University
Press 2011)
A Line-Up
3
4
Map of Exonerations in the U.S.
5
“Convicting the Innocent”Resource Websites
Data webpage home:•http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/librarysite/garrett_innocent.htm
Interactive resource:•http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Getting_it_Right.php
6
John Jerome White Trial
7
Manson v. Brathwaite432 U.S. 98 (1977)
(1)Was the procedure “unnecessarily suggestive”
(2)Was the identification nevertheless “reliable”?
(1) Opportunity to view (2) Degree of attention (3) Accuracy of prior description (4) Level of certainty(5) Length of time between crime and ID
8
Social Science Research • State v. Henderson, 2011 WL 3715028
(N.J. 2011) – “The research . . . represents the ‘gold standard in terms of the applicability of social science research to the law.’”
• Three stages of remembering
– acquisition, retention, retrieval
• System Variables –identification procedures
• Estimator Variables (lighting, weapon focus, distance, duration, memory decay, stress, witness characteristics, cross-race)
9
10
False Confidence
• “There is absolutely no question in my mind”– Steven Avery case
• “This is the man or it is his twin brother” That is one face I will never forget”– Thomas Doswell case
• “A hundred percent sure.”– Dean Cage case
• “One hundred and twenty” percent sure.– Willie Williams case
A Line-Up
11
12
The Eyewitnesses• I studied 160 exoneree trial transcripts• 84% involved a rape and testimony of the
victim• 68 were identified by multiple
eyewitnesses (36% of 190 cases)• 48% (92 of all 190 cases) involved a
cross-racial identification.• In 67 of those cases, white women
misidentified black men.• 12% of the cases (22 of all 190) involved
child eyewitnesses
13
Suggestion and Unreliability• 78% (124 of 160 cases with transcripts)
involved suggestive techniques
• 57% (91 of 160 cases with transcripts) involved witnesses who were initially not certain of their identification.
14
Types of identifications
• 117 exonerees were identified in a photo array
• 60 were identified in a line-up
• 53 were identified in a show-up
• 45 cases involved composite drawings
System Variables: Best Practices
• Blind identifications
• Sequential identifications
• Confidence statements
• Instructions
• Lineup Composition
15
Regulating ID’s in the Courtroom
• State v. Henderson, 2011 WL 3715028 (N.J. 2011)– Pre-trial hearings– Reliability factors grounded in social science– Detailed jury instructions
• Virginia - “Independent source” rules
• Admissibility of expert testimony
16
A Line-Up
17