Extra Sensory Perseption

download Extra Sensory Perseption

of 22

Transcript of Extra Sensory Perseption

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    1/22

    Extrasensory Perception

    (ESP)

    Lecture 7

    Parapsychology

    Paul Staples

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    2/22

    Overview

    What is ESP?

    Telepathy

    Clairvoyance

    Precognition and Retrocognition

    Experimental evidence

    Restricted-choice experiments

    Free-response experiments

    The process approach

    Summary

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    3/22

    Learning Objectives

    This session will enable you to

    Give a reasonable definition of ESP

    Categorise the various types of ESP

    Understand the nature of the experimental evidenceavailable

    Appreciate the criticisms and counter-criticisms ofsome of the findings

    Appreciate the difference between resticted-choice

    and free-response scenarios Recognise that there are other considerations, such as

    those suggested by the process approach

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    4/22

    What is ESP?

    Extrasensory perception (ESP) is perceptionthat occurs independently of the main physicalsenses (sight, hearing, touch, taste and smellor, indeed, perceptual processes such asproprioception)

    In some ways the term is vague but it isgenerally used to imply a source of informationthat is unknown to modern science

    ESP can be divided into a number of sub-categories

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    5/22

    Telepathy

    For telepathy the source of information isanother persons mind

    The principle requirement of telepathictransmission is that the information transfer

    cannot be explained by any known physicalprocess

    Often the demonstration involves informationtransfer over large distances

    Unlike physical information transfer, telepathyis not subject to the weakening of the signalthe further you move away from the source

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    6/22

    Clairvoyance

    Clairvoyance is similar to telepathy except thatthe source of the information is an object orevent rather than another mind

    As well as clairvoyance, we can proposeclairaudience where the source of informationis auditory rather than visual

    Clairaudience is an alleged psychic ability to

    hear things that are beyond the range of theordinary power of hearing, such as voices ormessages from the dead

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    7/22

    Precognition and retrocognition

    If the clairvoyance or clairaudience concerns things inthe future or the past the these are referred to asprecognition and retrocognition respectively

    Dreams have sometimes been related to precognition

    and characters like Nostradamus are famous for theirprecognitive visions

    Retrocognitions can be about recent events (e.g. theperpetrator of a recent murder) or distant events (e.g.historic events)

    Retrocognition is different from past life regression

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    8/22

    Experimental evidence

    ESP experiments fall into two broad categories

    Restricted-choice experiments The receiver must make a decision about what is being

    transmitted from a small set of known possibilities

    Zener cards are an example of restricted choice stimuli Free-response experiments

    Here the sender will choose an item from a large but finite setof possible stimuli

    The receiver is not told anything about the nature of the

    chosen stimulus The remote viewing you participated in was a free-response

    set up.

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    9/22

    Restricted-choice experiments

    In the 1930s one of the most prominent placesfor ESP research was the Rhine laboratory in

    America established by J B Rhine

    A typical study from that era is the Pearce-

    Pratt experiment Typical card-guessing experimentusing

    zener decks (25 cards, 5 target alternatives,MCE = 5)

    74 runs conducted over 37 sessions Sender and receiver (Pratt and Pearce) in

    separate buildings (100 or 250 yards apart)

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    10/22

    Restricted-choice experiments

    Watches synchronised so that when Pratt

    turned over a card, Pearce made a guess

    Both recorded their sequences

    Hits counted independently by Rhine

    Rhine present with Pratt during last few

    sessions

    Mean hits per run was significant at p < 10-22 No likelihood that resultswere due to chance

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    11/22

    Restricted-choice experiments

    Hansel (1961) criticised the study bysuggesting that as no-one was with Pearceduring the sessions, he could have gone out ofhis room and looked through a window at

    Pratts cards. This could not be shown to be wrong until

    1967 when Stevenson was able to locate theoriginal blueprints

    However, on scrutinising the official andunofficial reports of the experiments there areinconsistencies in the number of hits recorded

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    12/22

    Restricted-choice experiments

    Pratt-Woodruff experiment (1939) 2,400 runs across 32 volunteers

    Mean hit rate was 5.21, p < 0.00001

    However, the result attributable to only 5 of the 32

    volunteers Pavel Stepanek

    Library clerk from Czechoslovakia

    Took part in 27 studies across 18 investigators

    Was discovered through his ability to state whetherthe white or dark side of a thin piece of cardboardwas face up inside an opaque envelope

    Performance level at around 57% correct, p

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    13/22

    Restricted-choice experiments

    Bill Delmore Yale law student in the early 1970s

    Unusual in that he had vivid visual imagery, frequent luciddreams (knowing you are dreaming) and a high degree ofconfidence in his psi abilities

    520 playing cards mixed and placed in desk drawers

    Experimenter picked a card and without looking at it placed itin an opaque folder

    46 runs of 52 trials each (2392 trials)

    Delmore had an excessof exact hits! For exact hits p < 10-30

    Delmore was also successful on other tasks

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    14/22

    Free-response experiments

    Remote viewing (RV) experiments Puthoff and Targ were the first to do this in the late 1970s

    They worked with Uri Geller whom most parapsychologistsquickly became suspicious of

    Their first work was with Pat Price, a Californian policecommissioner

    Target location chosen from a pool of 100

    Target observed for 30 minutes

    Price asked to verbally describe and to draw the location

    Nine trials Independent judge taken to each site and then asked to rank

    the drawings from 1 to 9 according to their similarity to the site

    Seven were ranked first at the correct site (p < 10-4)

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    15/22

    Free-response experiments

    Critics of these experiments are Marks and Kammann(1980)

    They suggested that there were biasing clues in thetranscripts of the verbal descriptions

    Now some of the judges failed to correctly identifymatches

    Also, only the most successful trials were chosen forpublication and this falsely increased the statisticalresult

    However, there have been a number of successful RVexperiments reported in the literature

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    16/22

    Free-response experiments

    Ganzfeld Experiments

    We have already talked about the Ganzfeld

    procedure

    It has become a popular method of testing ESP Honorton (1978) claimed that 23 out of 42 ganzfeld

    experiments had yielded statistically significant

    results

    Successful results came from 9 independent labs Taken as a collection of results the evidence seems

    quite impressive

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    17/22

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    18/22

    Free-response experiments

    Honorton countered these criticisms byrecalculating the results in line with thecriticisms

    The level of success was notcompromised even though the successrates reported had been too high

    Other criticisms, such as one concerningthe quality of the randomisation process,were conceded by Honorton

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    19/22

    Free-response experiments

    Overall, it would seem that the studies have

    been fairly rigorous even though

    improvements could have been made

    However, this is no more true here than it is inall other areas of human research

    Whilst the apparent ESP demonstrated so far

    may not compel one to accept ESP, the

    evidence does point to there being something

    worth further investigation

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    20/22

    The process approach

    All of the research considered so far is

    concerned with trying to establish proof

    of the existence of ESP

    Other research tries to increase our

    understanding of psi anomalies

    Some may consider this approach

    premature until the proof has been

    verified

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    21/22

    The process approach

    The process approach looks at the following aspectsthat need to be considered Cognitive processesright hemisphere, cognitive capacity.

    Belief in ESPsheep and goats

    Personality traitsextraversion/ESP correlation The experimenter effectexperimenters get significant

    results in psi experiments because ofexperimenter error,psychology and psi hypotheses.

    It attempts to explore the degree to which these

    factors interact with ESP There is not time to explore these aspects further here

  • 8/13/2019 Extra Sensory Perseption

    22/22

    Summary

    We have seen that there is some

    convincing data concerning the possible

    existence of ESP

    The data are not yet at the stage where

    they provide unequivocal proof of the

    existence of ESP