Extensions of the notions of polynomial and rational hullbanach2019/pdf/Izzo.pdf · 2019. 7....

46
Extensions of the notions of polynomial and rational hull Alexander J. Izzo Banach Algebras and Applications, July 2019, University of Manitoba

Transcript of Extensions of the notions of polynomial and rational hullbanach2019/pdf/Izzo.pdf · 2019. 7....

  • Extensions of the notions of polynomial and rational hull

    Alexander J. Izzo

    Banach Algebras and Applications, July 2019, University of Manitoba

  • Outline

    I. Polynomial and Rational Hulls

    II. Motivating Questions

    III. The New Hulls

    IV. Applications

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    X is said to be polynomially convex if X̂ = X .

    X̂ is said to be nontrivial if X̂ \ X 6= ∅.

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    X is said to be polynomially convex if X̂ = X .

    X̂ is said to be nontrivial if X̂ \ X 6= ∅.

    P (X)= uniform closure of polynomials in z1, . . . , zn on X

    X̂ is the maximal ideal space of P (X).

    In particular, P (X) = C(X) =⇒ X̂ = X .

  • Examples

    In the plane, a compact set is polynomially convex if and only its com-

    plement is connected. The polynomial hull of a compact set in the plane

    is obtained by filling in the holes.

  • Examples

    In the plane, a compact set is polynomially convex if and only its com-

    plement is connected. The polynomial hull of a compact set in the plane

    is obtained by filling in the holes.

    The situation is vastly more complicated in CN for N ≥ 2. Consider

    K1 = {(eiθ, 0) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π} K2 = {(e

    iθ, e−iθ) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π}

    Both are circles, but K̂1 is the disc {(z, 0) : |z| ≤ 1}, while K2 is poly-

    nomially convex.

  • Examples

    In the plane, a compact set is polynomially convex if and only its com-

    plement is connected. The polynomial hull of a compact set in the plane

    is obtained by filling in the holes.

    The situation is vastly more complicated in CN for N ≥ 2. Consider

    K1 = {(eiθ, 0) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π} K2 = {(e

    iθ, e−iθ) : 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π}

    Both are circles, but K̂1 is the disc {(z, 0) : |z| ≤ 1}, while K2 is poly-

    nomially convex.

    There exist non-polynomially convex arcs (Wermer 1955) and Cantor

    sets (Rudin 1956).

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    Definition: The rational hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    hr(X) = {z ∈ CN : p(z) ∈ p(X) for all polynomials p}.

    X is said to be rationally convex if hr(X) = X .

    hr(X) is said to be nontrivial if hr(X) \ X 6= ∅.

  • Polynomial and Rational Convexity

    X ⊂ Cn compact

    Definition: The polynomial hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    X̂ = {z ∈ Cn : |p(z)| ≤ maxx∈X

    |p(x)| for every polynomial p}.

    Definition: The rational hull of X ⊂ Cn is the set

    hr(X) = {z ∈ CN : p(z) ∈ p(X) for all polynomials p}.

    X is said to be rationally convex if hr(X) = X .

    hr(X) is said to be nontrivial if hr(X) \ X 6= ∅.

    R(X)= uniform closure of rational functions holomorphic on X

    hr(X) is the maximal ideal space of R(X).

    In particular, R(X) = C(X) =⇒ hr(X) = X .

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

    “Conjecture”: Every nontrivial polynomial hull contains an analytic disc.

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

    “Conjecture”: Every nontrivial polynomial hull contains an analytic disc.

    Wermer (1958) prove this in the case of real-analytic 1-manifolds.

  • Analytic Structure in Polynomial Hulls

    Observe: If X ⊂ Cn bounds an analytic variety V , then by the maximum

    principle, V is contained in X̂.

    “Conjecture”: Every nontrivial polynomial hull contains an analytic disc.

    Wermer (1958) prove this in the case of real-analytic 1-manifolds.

    Theorem (Alexander 1971): If J is a rectifiable arc in Cn, then J is

    polynomially convex (and P (J) = C(J)).

    Theorem (Alexander 1971): If J is a rectifiable simple closed curve in

    Cn, then either J is polynomially convex (and P (J) = C(J)) or else

    Ĵ \ J a one-dimensional complex analytic subvariety of Cn \ J .

  • Polynomial Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (Stolzenberg 1963): There exists a compact set X in C2 such

    that X̂ \ X 6= ∅ but X̂ contains no analytic discs.

  • Polynomial Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (Stolzenberg 1963): There exists a compact set X in C2 such

    that X̂ \ X 6= ∅ but X̂ contains no analytic discs.

    Many later examples:

    Wermer (1970, 1982)

    Duval and Levenberg (1997)

    Alexander (1998)

  • Polynomial Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (Stolzenberg 1963): There exists a compact set X in C2 such

    that X̂ \ X 6= ∅ but X̂ contains no analytic discs.

    Many later examples:

    Wermer (1970, 1982)

    Duval and Levenberg (1997)

    Alexander (1998)

    Polynomial Hulls with Dense Invertibles

    Theorem (Dales and Feinstein 2008): There exists a compact set X in

    C2 with X̂ \ X 6= ∅ such that P (X) has dense invertibles.

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    A similar question was raised by Wermer (1954) but for 1-dimensional

    manifold in C2.

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    A similar question was raised by Wermer (1954) but for 1-dimensional

    manifold in C2.

    Question: Which compact spaces can be embedded in some CN so as

    to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

  • Topology of Sets with Hull without Analytic Discs

    Theorem (I., Samuelsson Kalm, Wold, 2016; I., Stout 2018): Every

    smooth compact manifold of real dimension ≥ 2 smoothly embeds in

    CN for some N so as to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic

    discs.

    Question (Bercovici 2014): Does there exist a (nonsmooth) 1-dimensional

    manifold with nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    A similar question was raised by Wermer (1954) but for 1-dimensional

    manifold in C2.

    Question: Which compact spaces can be embedded in some CN so as

    to have nontrivial polynomial hull without analytic discs?

    Fundamental Question: Does there exist a Cantor set with nontrivial

    polynomial hull without analytic discs?

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

    Theorem (Henkin 2006): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose rational

    hull contains an open set of C2.

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

    Theorem (Henkin 2006): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose rational

    hull contains an open set of C2.

    Question: Can Henkin’s theorem be generalized to CN for N > 2?

  • Cantor Sets with Hull with Interior

    Theorem (Vitushkin 1973): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose

    polynomial hull contains an open set of C2.

    Theorem (Henkin 2006): There exists a Cantor set in C2 whose rational

    hull contains an open set of C2.

    Question: Can Henkin’s theorem be generalized to CN for N > 2?

    Answer: Yes, but a direct generalization is not so interesting, because

    while in C2 to say z ∈ hr(X) means every analytic variety through z

    intersects X , in contrast, in CN , N > 2, hr(X) concerns only codimen-

    sion 1 analytic varieties.

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    How to define k-polynomial hull?

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    How to define k-polynomial hull?

    Note: If z ∈ h2r(X), then for V = {p = 0} (p a polynomial), z ∈

    hr((X ∩ V )).

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    How to define k-polynomial hull?

    Note: If z ∈ h2r(X), then for V = {p = 0} (p a polynomial), z ∈

    hr((X ∩ V )).

    To define 2-polynomial hull, replace z ∈ hr((X ∩ V )) by z ∈ X̂ ∩ V .

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    Definition: For 2 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-polynomial hull X̂k of X is the set

    X̂k = {z ∈ CN : z ∈ hk−1r (X) and z ∈ X̂ ∩ V for every analytic subvariety V

    of CN of pure codimension ≤ k − 1 that passes through z}.

    We say that X is k-polynomially convex if X̂k = X .

  • k-Hulls

    Definition: For 1 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-rational hull hkr (X) of X is the set

    hkr (X) = {z ∈ CN : every analytic subvariety of CN of pure

    codimension ≤ k that passes through z intersects X}.

    We say that X is k-rationally convex if hkr (X) = X .

    Definition: For 2 ≤ k ≤ N , the k-polynomial hull X̂k of X is the set

    X̂k = {z ∈ CN : z ∈ hk−1r (X) and z ∈ X̂ ∩ V for every analytic subvariety V

    of CN of pure codimension ≤ k − 1 that passes through z}.

    We say that X is k-polynomially convex if X̂k = X .

    With these definitions

    X̂ = X̂1 ⊃ hr(X) = h1

    r(X) ⊃ X̂2 ⊃ h2r(X) ⊃ · · · ⊃ X̂

    n ⊃ hnr (X) = X.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Three Fundamental Constructions

    (i) Stolzenberg 1963: Take a limit of boundaries of analytic varieties whose

    hulls are such that their projections to the coordinate planes miss points

    of a dense set.

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    (iii) Wermer 1982 (based on Cole 1968): Take a limit of graphs of multivalued

    analytic functions involving square roots to get a “Riemann surface with

    an infinite number of branch points”.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

    Lemma: Let p be a polynomial on CN and X = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ ∂B. (B =

    unit ball in CN ) Then X̂ = hr(X) = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ B.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

    Lemma: Let p be a polynomial on CN and X = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ ∂B. (B =

    unit ball in CN ) Then X̂ = hr(X) = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ B.

    What makes the proof of the lemma work is that ∂̂B2

    = B.

  • Hulls without Analytic Discs

    Fundamental Construction (ii)

    (ii) Wermer 1970: Successively remove sets from the boundary of a domain

    in CN in such a way that what is left in the limit has hull without analytic

    discs.

    The key to (ii) is to cut out subsets with the property that a point of

    the domain lies in the rational hull of the set that remains if it does not

    lie in the polynomial hull of the set removed. One approach uses:

    Lemma: Let p be a polynomial on CN and X = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ ∂B. (B =

    unit ball in CN ) Then X̂ = hr(X) = {ℜp ≤ 0} ∩ B.

    What makes the proof of the lemma work is that ∂̂B2

    = B.

    With this observation one can generalize the lemma to get a very flexible

    method of constructing hulls without analytic discs.

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Corollary: For N ≥ 2, there exists a totally disconnected, perfect set in

    CN that intersects every analytic subvariety of CN of positive dimension.

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Theorem: For N ≥ 3, there exists a Cantor set K in CN with nontrivial

    (N−2)-rational hull and whose polynomial hull contains no analytic discs

    (and such that P (K) has dense invertibles).

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Theorem: For N ≥ 3, there exists a Cantor set K in CN with nontrivial

    (N−2)-rational hull and whose polynomial hull contains no analytic discs

    (and such that P (K) has dense invertibles).

    Corollary: There exists a simple closed curve (and an arc) in C3 with

    nontrivial polynomial hull containing no analytic discs.

  • Applications

    Theorem: Any compact set X ⊂ CN with nontrivial k-polynomial hull

    (k ≥ 2) contains a subset Y with nontrivial (k − 1)-rational hull such

    that Ŷ contains no analytic discs (and P (Y ) has dense invertibles).

    Theorem: There exists a Cantor set in CN (N ≥ 2) whose (N − 1)-

    rational hull contains an open set of CN .

    Theorem: For N ≥ 3, there exists a Cantor set K in CN with nontrivial

    (N−2)-rational hull and whose polynomial hull contains no analytic discs

    (and such that P (K) has dense invertibles).

    Corollary: There exists a simple closed curve (and an arc) in C3 with

    nontrivial polynomial hull containing no analytic discs.

    Corollary: Every uncountable, compact, metrizable space of finite topo-

    logical dimension can be embedded in some CN so as to have nontrivial

    polynomial hull without analytic discs.

  • Open Question

    Does there exist a Cantor set in C2 with a nontrivial polynomial hull

    that contains no analytic discs?