EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM FOR …
Transcript of EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM FOR …
The Pennsylvania State University
The Graduate School
Environmental Pollution Control
EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT AND HUMAN
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES:
ULAANBAATAR CITY, MONGOLIA
A Thesis in
Environmental Pollution Control
by
Temuulen Murun
© 2015 Temuulen Murun
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements
for the Degree of
Master of Science
December 2015
ii
The thesis of Temuulen Murun was reviewed and approved* by the following:
Shirley Clark Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering Program Coordinator, Master`s of Science in Environmental Pollution
Control Thesis Advisor
Yen-Chih Chen Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering
Kathleen Raffaele Senior Science Advisor Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. EPA
*Signatures are on file in the Graduate School
iii
ABSTRACT
Over two decades ago, the European Union developed and started
implementing the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policy to prevent household
hazardous waste (HHW) pollution and its environmental and human health risks.
Because of the increase in population, rapid urbanization, and the amount of importing
hazardous waste in developing countries, appropriate solid waste management and
disposal are needed especially for HHW treatment.
As a developing country, Mongolia does not have specific regulations and
treatment requirements for HHW. Unlike developed countries, the mandatory EPR
policy run by government will be necessary for Mongolia because small and family-
owned businesses are not willing to handle waste voluntarily due to the cost of
collection, recycling, and final disposal. Moreover, a Producer Responsibility
Organization (PRO) will face difficulties if advanced recycling fees and end-of-life
fees from consumers fund the organization, since the country`s GDP per capita in 2014
was only US $11,508.98 (Trading economics). Therefore, under the EPR program,
cooperation between a municipality and PROs is necessary and mutually beneficial,
especially in waste collection and transporting.
This is especially important because of the potential health risks resulting from
incineration of HHW. Due to open burning fluorescent bulbs in the central waste
facility, it is estimated that 69,637kg Hg/yr could be released into the atmosphere
directly. Human health risks from mercury exposure, using a traditional risk
characterization procedure, showed potential neurological concerns (hazard quotient:
14.42, exposure time: 12hr/d) for children who live within 500m of this municipal
waste incineration. In contrast, renal effects due to lead exposure (82.28kg Pb/yr) from
lead-acid vehicle battery recycling factories showed a low health risk for children. To
prevent this children`s neurological effect implementation of the mandatory EPR
program for HHW such as automobile batteries, fluorescent bulbs, and used tires is
necessary in developing countries because most of municipal solid waste facility are
designed poorly to capture emissions of hazardous substances.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures………………………………………………………….………….......v
List of Tables……………………………………………………………………...…..vi
Abbreviation………………………………………………………………………….vii
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION………..………………………….…………………..…1
Chapter 2 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT…………...….4
Background of Extended Producer Responsibility program……………...…...4
The EPR program implementation in developing countries……..…..………..9
Municipal solid waste and household hazardous waste management in
Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia…………...………….…...……………………...15
Municipal solid waste……..……………………..…………………...15
Household hazardous waste…………………..…….………………..17
General EPR policy framework in developing countries: Ulaanbaatar city,
Mongolia……………………………...………………………………….…..19
Chapter 3 MERCURY RISK ASSESSMENT…………………….….......………….28
Mercury exposure from municipal solid waste incineration…………………28
Hazard identification…………………………………………………………35
Physical and chemical properties of elemental mercury……………..35
Toxicology: Neurological effects in children………………………...36
Risk characterization…………………………………………………………40
Chapter 4 LEAD RISK ASSESSMENT………………………………..………...….43
Lead exposure from recycling lead-acid car battery factors…………………43
Hazard identification…………………….……………………………….......49
Physical and chemical properties of lead…………..………………...49
Toxicology: Renal effects in children...………………….…………..51
Risk characterization………………….………………………………...…....53
Chapter 5 CONCLUSIONS…………………………….……………………..….….55
References……………………………………………………………………………58
v
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Trends of e-waste generated in the U.S……………….…………………….2
Figure 2: Extended Producer Responsibility program………....…………………...…4
Figure 3: EPR program adoption…………………………………………………...…5
Figure 4: Recycled material components from e-waste………………………….…..11
Figure 5: E-waste management in Switzerland…...…………………………….……12
Figure 6: The recovery rate for some household wastes……………………………..15
Figure 7: Electronic waste composition by weight…….…………………………….18
Figure 8: EPR policy by product type………………………………………………..20
Figure 9: PROs and municipal participation in the EPR program (Mongolia)...….…25
Figure 10: EU Battery Directive (labels)…………………………………………….27
Figure 11: Compact FL driver………………………………………….…………….29
Figure 12: The former MSW facility…………………………..….……………...….32
Figure 13: The former MSW facility location and the city center…………………...33
Figure 14: The metallic mercury airborne exposure pathway…………….………….34
Figure 15: Dose and renal and neurological effects of mercury airborne
exposure (chronic)………………….………………………………………...38 Figure 16: Dose-response of elemental mercury vapor (inhalation)…………………39
Figure 17: The pollutant zone within the 500 m radius……………………………...40
Figure 18: Internal structure of a lead-acid battery………………………....………..44
Figure 19: The chemical reaction in a lead-acid battery………………………....…..45
Figure 20: Typical recycling process of used LABs in developing countries……….47
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Urban waste generation by regions…………………………………………..1
Table 2: Factors to develop the EPR policy …………………...........…………….…..9
Table 3: The EU classification of e-waste…………….……...……………………...10
Table 4: Japanese waste management laws………………………………………….13
Table 5: Annual municipal waste generation in Ulaanbaatar city, 2012…………….16
Table 6: E-waste export and import…………………….……………………………20
Table 7: Energy saving from recycled materials………………………..……………26
Table 8: Mercury source in MSW………………………………...………………… 28
Table 9: Mercury containing lamps……………………………………………….....30
Table 10: Mercury emission from waste incineration………………………………..34
Table 11: The amount of mercury released into environment…………………….…33
Table 12: Physical and chemical properties of mercury……………………………..35
Table 13: NOAEL and LOAEL of animals and the human……………………….....37
Table 14: The mean wind velocity and average mixing height…………………...…41
Table 15: Consumption of lead for batteries (1993)…………………...…………….43
Table 16: Lead components in automobile batteries…….………………………..…45
Table 17: Lifetime of automobile batteries (1995)……...…………………………...46
Table 18: The annual amount of lead from LABs (Ulaanbaatar city)…….…………47
Table 19: Physical and chemical properties of lead………………………………….50
Table 20: LOAELs for neurological disorders……………………………………….51
Table 21: Lead nephrotoxicity in humans (Dose-Response)………...………………52
Table 23: Matrix application for the EPR policy framework……………..………….54
vii
ABBREVIATIONS
ADF Advanced disposal fees
ASTDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
AT Averaging time
BW Body weight
BC British Columbia
CDI Chronic daily intake
CFL Compact fluorescent lamps
CA Contaminant concentration in air
FL Fluorescent Lamp
EOL End-of-life
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ED Exposure duration
EF Exposure frequency
ET Exposure time
EPR Extended Producer Responsibility
GASI General Agency of Specialized Inspection
GDP Gross domestic product
HQ Hazard quotient
HHW Household hazardous waste
IR Inhalation rate
IMERC Interstate Mercury Education and Reduction Clearinghouse
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
LAB Lead acid battery
LCD Liquid Crystal Display
LOAEL Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect Levels
MRL Minimum response level
MSW Municipal Solid Waste
NOAEL No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Levels
NGO Non-governmental organization
NPO Non-profit organization
viii
OERR Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
PC Personal Computer
PCA Paint Care Association
PRO Producer Responsibility Organization
PbB Blood Lead
RfC Reference concentration
RoHS Restriction of Hazardous Substances
SENS Sustainability Expertise Network Solution
TPL Toxicology Profile for Lead
UB Ulaanbaatar
UF Uncertainty Factor
UNEP United Nations Environment Programme
WEEE Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
WHO World Health Organization
1
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Because of the rapid increase in population in developing countries,
appropriate solid waste disposal is needed. This will both protect residents` health and
upgrade a city’s sanitation and hygiene. For those cities that use incineration without
air control equipment as a final waste disposal option, air quality of the cities will be
polluted significantly. Thus solid waste management has become a crucial problem
especially in developing countries in recent years. According to East Asia and Pacific
Region of World Bank (What a Waste: Solid Waste Management in Asia, 1999),
“The urban areas of Asia produce about 760,000 tons of municipal solid waste per
day. In 2025, this figure will increase to 1.8 million tons of waste per day, or 5.2
million cubic meter per day.” This data shows how dramatically the solid waste
generation is increasing in cities in developing countries. Table 1 shows that waste
generation in urban areas will be doubled by 2025. (The World Bank, What a Waste:
A Global Review of Solid Waste Management, 2012)
Table 1. Urban waste generation by regions
Region Urban waste (2012) Urban waste (2025)
Africa 169,119 (t/d) 441,840 (t/d)
East Asia and Pacific 738,9958 (t/d) 1,865,379 (t/d)
OECD countries 1,566,286 (t/d) 1,742,417 (t/d)
Latin America and the
Caribbean region
437,545 (t/d) 728,492 (t/d)
Therefore, to decrease the environmental burden, increase living conditions, save
expenditures on unsophisticated disposal methods and resulting health problems, the
developing countries have been working on how to create efficient municipal solid
waste (MSW) treatments.
Household hazardous waste (HHW) treatment in developing countries is the
main issue in a municipal waste line because it contains potential hazardous
chemicals, which will need advanced treatment and most of the countries burn it
outside or dump it to open-sites. According to the U.S. EPA, HHW includes paints,
2
consumer electronic products, batteries, fluorescent bulbs, pesticides, etc. All these
products can cause similar problems to industrial hazardous waste in the environment
if there is enough accumulation or inappropriate treatment for the waste. HHW has
been increasing in both developed and developing countries due to economic
development and rapid urbanization in cities. For example, according to Baeyens
(2010), “Non-rechargeable batteries contribute up to 90% of the total battery
consumption in Europe.” For the paint and related products, it also could contain
heavy metals such as cadmium, chromium, selenium, and lead. Paintcare (2012) states
“in the U.S., approximately 10% of paint sold in California is classified as “leftover”
paint, which equaled 6 million gallons in 2010, with approximately 70% being latex
paint.” Figure 1 shows the increase in electronic waste from consumer and industrial
usage in the U.S. (e-wasteregulation2, 2010). The same increasing pattern of personal
and office computer ownership and use that is one of the main HHWs at the end of
their life can be seen in developing countries.
Fig 1. Trends of e-waste generated in the U.S.
To prevent HHW pollution and human health effects, especially in developing
countries, the waste policy, regulations, and standards have to be systematic. Also it
should include responsibilities for consumers and producers as to how they will
handle the post-consumer waste. According to the OECD report, the most developed
and sustainable HHW management is the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
program, which requires producers to take all the physical and financial
3
responsibilities for their products` waste. However, in developing countries like
Mongolia, it is anticipated that it will need municipality participation in the EPR
policy for it to be effective.
To assess the risk of inappropriate disposal of HHW, risk assessment can be
used to analyze and characterize human and environmental health risks from toxic
substances and other stressors. Overall, risk assessment can be divided into two
groups: human health assessment and ecological risk analysis (U.S. EPA). In the EPA
guidance, to assess human health risk, several steps are needed: Planning and scoping
processes, Hazardous identification, Dose-Response, Exposure Assessment and Risk
Characterization.
This paper will focus on the potential and benefits from implementing the
Extended Producer Responsibility policy framework for HHW management in a
developing country, Mongolia, to identify human health risks from heavy metals in
waste by analyzing exposure and risk assessment.
4
Chapter 2
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Chapter 2 will introduce the key factors of developing the EPR policy, based
on the OECD manual for governments. Then the chapter analyzes the EPR program
implementation in developed regions/countries (the European Union, Germany,
Japan, Swiss, and British Columbia in Canada) to develop lessons that can be used in
developing countries to create their own EPR programs. Municipal solid and
household hazardous waste management, and regulations in Ulaanbaatar (UB) city,
Mongolia also are introduced in this chapter. Finally, the chapter will discuss EPR
policy implementation in the city and its general framework, legislation, and
operational management.
Background Information of Extended Producer Responsibility program
According to a guideline manual for governments on extended producer
responsibility published by the OECD in 2001, a definition of EPR is “an
environmental policy approach in which a producer`s responsibility for a product is
extended to the post-consumer stage of a product`s life cycle.” In other words, the
EPR program is the most sustainable waste management policy because it states a
responsibility for producers to handle and treat the post-consumer waste of their
products to prevent environmental pollution and human health risks due to the
hazardous waste and toxic substances. Upstream and downstream waste management
in the EPR policy is shown in Figure 2 (McKerlie, Knight, and Thorpe, 2006).
Fig 2. Extended Producer Responsibility program
Manufacture
Retail/Sale
Waste collection
Trasportation
Recycling/Reuse
Recycled and raw materials
5
Is the Extended Producer Responsibility program necessary?
Due to rapid urbanization especially in developing countries, the amount of
solid waste and household hazardous waste has been increasing; however, municipal
waste management and treatment capacity are not able to handle the waste. The
municipal revenue from taxpayers is not enough because of increased waste loading;
therefore, it needs to be funded by outside investment/non-tax revenue. Thus, to meet
the demand, there will be a need for a new waste management policy to reduce the
municipality’s burden physically and financially (OECD, 2001). In 1994, the OECD
began working and developing the EPR framework and the member countries
initiated implementation of the approaches in their national level policy (OECD,
2014). Since then, the number of waste and environmental policies that have adopted
the EPR program has been increasing around the world. Figure 3 shows an increasing
trend of EPR program adoption (OECD, 2014).
Fig 3. EPR program adoption
A Guidance Manual for Governments on Extended Producer Responsibility
In the manual (OECD, 2001), the governmental EPR framework and
individual participant`s responsibilities, cost and benefits are written in detail.
The main concerns that the EPR program has to answer are increasing collection and
recycling rates, producer`s financial responsibility, and improvement of product
design to consider the environmental impact. Further broader categories for designing
an EPR framework would include (OECD, 2014):
• Product take-back process:
6
This program requires manufacturers to take back their products after usage and it can
be through retailers or contractors that are paid by producers. Sometimes, to increase
the collection and recycling rate, different kinds of incentives can be given to
consumers for bringing back the post-consumer products (OECD, 2014). If the
producers have to meet targets for collection and recycling, the operation will be more
efficient in order to meet the target.
• Market-based instrument:
The EPR program should be economically beneficial to each party: private industry,
communities, and government authorities. For instance, deposit-refund programs,
advanced disposal fees (ADF), and natural material taxes can be incentives for
stakeholders.
1. Deposit-refund programs:
In the OECD guideline (2001), the deposit-refund system is defined as a
program where “a payment (deposit) is made when the product is purchased
and is fully or partially refunded when the product is returned to a dealer or
specialized treatment facility”. Retailers return the deposit when they receive
the same brand which they sell. It seems that a higher deposit price encourages
a higher return rate (OECD, 1994).
2. Advanced disposal fees (ADF):
According to the OECD guidance (2001), “an advanced disposal fee would
be a fee levied on certain products or product groups based on estimated
costs of collection and treatment methods“. Government, a private industry, or
a Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO) could collect the fee; however,
it should be clarified in the planning of the EPR program. Even though some
OECD member countries have ADFs at the point of sale, they have a system
to return a portion of the fee due to reduction of recycling fees for the products
(OECD, 2001).
3. Virgin material taxes:
The goal of the material tax is to increase recycled material usage and
reducing the virgin material proportion in the products. Also, a special tax can
be levied on potential hazards and toxic materials to encourage reducing
environmental pollution (OECD, 2001). The revenue from these taxes
7
would be used for waste collection, treatment, and the cost for managing the
system.
• Regulations and standards:
The EPR program can be mandatory or voluntary based on the country`s economic
growth, infrastructure, and socio-cultural situation, including residents` education and
public support. Voluntary programs can be established between industries and public
authorities or private sectors and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Some
countries in the EU have a target percentage for several post-consumer waste
categories to be recycled and minimum recycled content requirements for paper
products, beverage bottles, and plastic containers (OECD, 2001).
• Information-based instruments:
Public awareness for environmental policies and human health effects due to
pollutants is important to implement the EPR program successfully on the national
level. Therefore, to raise this awareness, producers’ annual reports of recycled rates,
clear labels for the products having a potential hazard to humans and the environment,
waste separation reports, communication between producers and consumers, and the
rate of second hand or recycled materials usage in products can be strong
measurements for producers to comply with EPR policy.
The OECD Global forum on environment (2014) stated several important
factors are necessary to develop the EPR program. Based on different factors/targets,
the program`s outcome will be various.
• Type of product
The program covers only one product such as televisions and car batteries or a group
of products like any electronic waste or used vehicle oil. According to the OECD
(2014), small electronic waste is easily covered by an EPR program.
• Voluntary or Mandatory
Whether the EPR program can be voluntary or mandatory is based on agreement
between government authorities and private sectors. If the producers are willing to
participate the program, it may not be necessary to legislate the EPR policy. A
voluntary EPR program can be referred to as a Stewardship program (OECD, 2014).
Nicol and Thompson (2007) stated the Product Stewardship program is a shared
responsibility system; therefore, producers do not have financial and physical
8
responsibility of post-consumer waste for disposal and treatment. They argue that the
policy fails to prevent pollution from waste and reduce consumption.
• Operation of waste management
The manufacturer could handle the collection and recycling process individually or
producers could establish a PRO that is funded by member producers based on their
products` recycling methods, hazardous substance content, and weight. The
organization acts on behalf of their member manufacturers; therefore, PROs could
collect and recycle post-consumer waste (OECD, 2014). More than 260 PROs were
established in Europe in between 1998 and 2007 (Mayers, 2007).
• Financial or Organizational responsibility
At the global forum (OECD, 2014), it stated the producers could select the financial
or organizational responsibility for their products` waste management.
1. Financial responsibility: Producers or PROs pay municipalities annually
for handling the post-consumer waste. Recycling and collection could be
treated by specific contractors or municipalities.
2. Organizational responsibility: Producers or PROs finance and operate
waste management and treatment or contract with recyclers directly.
• Responsibility among stakeholders:
The goal of the EPR program is to shift the responsibility for waste management from
municipalities to manufacturers. However, in most countries, municipalities are still
in charge of the collection and sorting due to their capability. The municipality has
sufficient storage and infrastructure to handle waste. Once post-consumer waste is
sorted, then it is transferred to the manufacturers for recycling treatment. Different
countries have various responsibilities for stakeholders; however, even for consumers,
the responsibility should be clarified. For instance, in Japan, final consumers are in
charge of separating their waste and paying a recycling fee for electronic wastes:
television, washing machine, etc. (OECD, 2014).
• Cost for full operation:
The main concern is how to calculate the full cost of end-of-life coverage and how
much the producers should cover fees for handling waste. The OECD manual (2001)
discusses the full cost including collection, sorting, recycling, awareness campaigns,
public advertisement, monitoring, and reporting. For the small businesses and
9
importers, the full cost of waste management and operation will be a burden, so it
needs to discussed and defined clearly in the EPR context.
• Free riders, orphan and existing products
In the guideline, free riders are defined as “the actors in EPR system who do not pay
for the benefits they receive” (OECD, 2001). If the product`s producer has gone
bankrupt or does not exist anymore, the product is an orphan product. Existing
products also were produced before the EPR policy was implemented. All these
products obtain advantages that are not regulated under the EPR program, which can
make a negative impact on the system. According to the OECD manual (2001), peer
pressure, monitoring, reporting, and sanctions can be tools for avoiding free riders.
Moreover, government authorities would make standards and rules for minimizing
and eliminating them. Management of the orphan and existing products depends on
cost of waste treatment, recycling methods, and the numbers of products that are in
the market (OECD, 2001).
Based on the above several factors, examples of different types of approaches
for development of the EPR program are shown in Table 2 (OECD, 2001).
Table 2. Factors to develop the EPR policy
Factors Take-back program 1. Mandatory
2. Voluntary Legislations 1. Target percentage for recycling
2. Disposal bans 3. Prohibition for hazardous
substances 4. Usage of recycled material
Economic approaches 1. Deposit-refund 2. Advance recycling fees 3. End of life fees 4. Natural material taxes
The EPR program implementation in developed countries
• European Union and Germany
Under the EPR policy, the European Union`s waste management has been
leading the world in sustainable management and reduced environmental burden. The
main legislations are: End-of-life Vehicles Directive, Packaging and Packaging
Waste Directive, Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive, and
10
Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) (McKerlie, Knight, and Thorpe, 2006).
According to the WEEE Directive (2003), member countries` manufacturers have to
take responsibility for all costs of collection, sorting, recycling, reusing, and disposal
stages for the products` post-consumer waste. This system leads to innovative
recyclable designs for the products in early manufacturing stages (McKerlie et al,
2006). Moreover, the Directive reduces the amount of e-waste going to landfills and
incinerators by promoting the recycled material proportion and the target-recycling
rate. Overall, European countries have around 114 PROs for packaging waste
management, 17 PROs for batteries` end-of-life disposal, and 129 WEEE PROs
(Mayers, 2007), which indicates the PRO system is well developed financially and
operationally. Table 3 illustrates the EU classification of WEEE and its labeling
information (Khetriwal, Kraeuchi and Widmer, 2009; Nnorom and Osibajo, 2008).
Table 3. The EU classification of e-waste
WEEE Category Special label
1. Large home appliances Large HH
2. Small home appliances Small HH
3. IT and telecommunication equipment ICT
4. Consumer equipment CE
5. Lighting equipment Lighting
6. Electronic tools E&E tools
7. Toys and sports equipment Toys
8. Medical devices Medical equipment
9. Monitoring and control instruments M&C
10. Automatic dispensers Dispensers
The RoHS Directive was initiated in 2002 and began in July 2006. It limits six
potential hazardous substances: “lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, two
flame retardants added to plastics: polybrominated diphenyl ethers and
polybrominated biphenyls” in order to prevent their use in electronic products ranging
from small electric toys to washing machines (McKerlie et al, 2006; Kahhat et al,
2008; Sthiannopkao and Wong, 2013). The European Directives have had a
significant impact on the international electronic market by requiring producers to
11
redesign products with fewer hazardous materials and in preparation for easy
recycling and dismantling processes.
The Green Dot program for packaging waste is the first and largest EPR
program in Germany and the EU. According to the program, every producer of
packaged products is required to establish their own take-back program or participate
in PRO: Duales System Deutschland (McKerlie et al, 2006). Member manufacturers
have to pay an annual fee to use the eco-label that indicates that there is a free
collection program. This program and labeling make it easy to notice and convenient
for consumers. The fees are different based on the material and weight of products;
for instance, tin or paper products have low fees because they are made of highly
recyclable materials (McKerlie et al, 2006). In total, Germany has eight PROs for
packaging waste, three PROs for end-of-life of batteries, and twenty PROs for WEEE
management (Mayers, 2007). McKerlie et al (2006) concluded that the Green Dot
program for packaging waste has resulted in more efficient recycling package design
and waste reduction to final disposal.
• Switzerland
The European Union`s WEEE Directive was legislated in 2003; however, the
Swiss have had take-back e-waste legislation since 1998 (Khetriwal et al, 2009). The
largest two PROs: SWICO Recycling Guarantee and SENS Swiss Foundation for
Waste Management collect and dispose of waste for their member producers and
importers. Figure 4 shows the recycled material from WEEE under the two PROs:
SENS and SWICO (Widmer et al, 2005).
Fig 4. Recycled material components from e-waste
12
In 2007, four PROs in Switzerland that are all non profit organizations (NPOs) treat
most of the e-waste from households to offices, including the categories 1-5, 6, and 7
of the EU classification of WEEE (Table 2).
Consumers are obligated to return used products to retailers or collectors and
to pay the advanced recycling fee (ARF) for newly purchased products. Therefore,
there should be less illegal electronic waste dumping because no disposal fees need to
be paid in the post-consumer stage. According to Khetriwal et al (2009), the recycling
fee paid by consumers is calculated by two methods: product price index (SWICO)
and six different fee categories (SENS). Under the Swiss law, retailers should inform
consumers that the price includes the ARF; moreover, PROs recommend putting a
visible recycling fee to raise awareness about recycling in the end-of-life stage. The
ARF is collected from consumers, manufacturers, and importers to PROs to fund
collection, transport, storage, dismantling and recycling of disposed products. Figure
5 shows the electronic waste EPR system in Switzerland (Khetriwal et al, 2009).
Fig 5. E-waste management in Switzerland
• Japan:
In 1998, the Japanese government enacted the Home Appliance Recycling
Law and implemented it nationwide in 2001. Under the law, producers and importers
are responsible for managing the recycling of four types of home appliance:
televisions, refrigerators, washing machines, and air conditioners (Kahhat et al, 2008).
The last consumers are obligated to pay a part of the fee for recycling, transportation
and to sort the appliance from municipal waste. The end-of-life fee is based on the
13
type of products and is around US $23-44 for recycling processes and US $4-18 for
transportation (Ogushi and Kandlikar, 2007). The main disadvantage of the end-of-
life (EOL) fee paid in the disposal stage is that it could increase illegal dumping.
Around 2 percent of EOL home appliances (172,000 units) were illegally discharged
in 2004 and it is higher than illegal dumping in 2001 (Ogushi and Kandlikar, 2007).
Mostly municipalities are in charge of collecting and transferring the end-of-life
electronic products, but the individual sector`s role in collecting e-waste has been
increasing. The Association for Electric Home Appliances of Japan handles orphan
products (Nnorom and Osibanjo, 2008).
In 2001, Japan legislated the Law for Promotion of Effective Resource
Utilization to cover used computers from the business sector and individual
consumers. A Personal Computer (PC) 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) Promotion
center was established by manufacturers to collect and recycle PCs sold after Oct
2003. PCs covered by the program have a “PC Recycling Mark” to indicate a non-
refundable recycling fee and the payment is paid at the point of sale. However, for the
computers sold before Oct 2003, the final consumers need to pay recycling and
collection fees of products (Kahhat et al, 2008). In 2004, at the G8 Summit, Japan
introduced the 3R program to the international stage to promote sustainable waste
management (Sthiannopkao and Wong, 2013). The program prioritizes reducing the
waste generation at source points, reusing valuable materials from products, and
recycling materials from waste for different purposes.
The End of Life Vehicle Recycling Law requires the customer to pay a
recycling fee at the time of the new car purchase (Ogushi and Kandlikar, 2007) to
prevent illegal disposal. Under the EPR policy, the success of the Japanese recycling
process is due to environmentally focused development in the manufacturing stage
and central recycling factories around the country. Table 4 shows the main waste
management laws in Japan (Ogushi and Kandlikar, 2007).
Table 4. Japanese waste management laws
Law Content Year enforced
Recovery rate (Fiscal yr)
Fundamental Law for Establishing a Sound Material Cycle Society
Products are need to be recycled
2001
14
Waste Management Law Required 3R program in 10 industries and 96 products
2001
Law for Promotion of Effective Utilization of Resources
Desktop PCs Laptop PCs Cathode ray tube Liquid crystal display Ni-Cd batteries Ni-MH batteries Li ion rechargeable batteries Small lead batteries
2001 76 (2005) 54 (2005) 78 (2005) 68 (2005) 74 (2004) 77 (2004) 55 (2004) 50 (2004)
Containers and Packaging Recycling Law
Cans, bottles, cartons and boxes
1997
Home Appliance Recycling Law
Air conditioners Televisions Refrigerators and freezers Washing machines
2001 84 (2005) 77 (2005) 66 (2005) 75 (2005)
Food recycling Law Food waste 2001 45 (2004) Construction Material Recycling Law
Concrete Wood Asphalt
2002 98 (2002) 89 (2002) 99 (2002)
End of Life Vehicle (EOL) Recycling Law
EOL vehicles 2004 57-68 (2005)
• British Columbia, Canada:
The British Columbia (BC) government started developing a municipal waste
management plan in 1989 and the strategy was approved in 1995. The main goal of
the plan was to prevent pollution from household hazardous waste such as paints,
pesticides, and batteries (Driedger, 2002). In 1994, the Waste Reduction
Commissioner required manufacturers and producers to take back and recycle the
eight HHW; therefore, the producers of paints and related products established the BC
Paint Care Association (PCA) to treat and dispose of used paints. The manufacturers
need to pay an eco-fee (C$0.50/4L container and C$0.10/aerosol container) to the
PCA for the collection, recycling, and final disposal (Driedger, 2002). Similar to the
paint treatment system, the EPR program for HHW such as hazardous
pharmaceuticals, drugs, pesticides, and automobile oil products has been expanding
significantly. Due to the successful closed-loop waste management system in BC
Canada, the recovery rate on household waste is more than 70 percent. Figure 6
15
illustrates the recovery rate for some common household wastes: containers, car
batteries, tires etc. (McKerlie, 2006).
Fig 6. The recovery rate for some household wastes
The unique feature for the membership fee system in the Paint and Product Care
Association is that the fee is based on producer`s market share capacity (Driedger,
2002). This can be a useful approach for the small manufacturers and importers to
collect a fee, plus there is a potential reduction in the number of free riders and orphan
products. The eco-fee paid by consumers is not a federal tax in Canada, so the fee is a
part of the price charged by the manufacturers and retained by the manufacturers.
This requires the manufacturers to highlight the reasons for and uses of the eco-fee.
Municipal solid waste and household hazardous waste management and
treatment in Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia
Municipal solid waste Between 2006 and 2010, a new landfill plant funded by Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA) was built in UB city to treat municipal solid waste. The
city has five waste treatment centers and population is approximately 1372 (National
Plan for Waste Management Improvement, 2014 and Statistics Department of
Ulaanbaatar city, 2014). However, open dumping of waste from construction and
open burning of household solid wastes are common nationwide. General
consumption also has been increased due to mining sector development and foreign
investment; for example, in 2011 the percent from the previous year was increased 8.9
96% 91% 75%
99% 96%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
beer containers wine and spirit containers
non-‐alcohol beverage containers
car batteries tires
Recovery rate
16
percent for imported chemical substances, 28.6 percent for office equipment and
electronic products, 28.1 percent for vehicle batteries and tires, and 71.8 percent for
secondhand vehicles (National Plan for Waste Management Improvement, 2014). Due
to an overwhelmed waste generation and treatment system in UB city, in 2012, the
Mongolian government passed a new waste law that includes municipal solid waste,
industrial waste, and hazardous waste (Waste Law, 2012). According to the law, each
city`s authority is responsible for collecting only municipal waste that is generated
within its territory and treating the disposed waste in a centralized waste facility. For
industrial waste and hazardous waste, manufacturers are required by the law to
transport waste to the centralized treatment facility and to pay a fee for the final
disposal. The fee depends on the weight and hazardous components of the waste
(Waste Law, 2012). The budget for MSW treatment consists of mostly tax revenue
and the disposal service fee from industries. Therefore, there has been a huge burden
on the municipality to handle both consumer and industrial waste given the small
budget for waste treatment.
According to the final JICA report for waste management improvement in UB
city (2012), the MSW facility, the preferred option for household waste disposal, has
high emissions of pollutant gases, and increased risks for both human health and
environment. The amount of waste generated in the city is shown in following Table 5
(Final JICA report, 2012).
Table 5. Annual municipal waste generation in Ulaanbaatar city, 2012
Household waste generation (ton/day) 1096.6
Waste from business activities (ton/day) 397.9
Waste from public cleaning (ton/day) 31.8
Total (ton/day) 1526.3
Due to the rapid movement of people from the countryside to the city and the
construction boom in the capital city, the annual amount of waste likely has increased
since 2012. For instance, in 2009 the amount of annual solid waste was 820,000 tons
at the national level; in 2013 the amount was up to 2.4 million tons (National Plan for
Waste Management Improvement, 2014). Under the National Plan (2014), the waste
improvement strategy is going to be implemented in two phases.
17
1. The first phase (2014-2017):
To develop the legal environment for waste reduction, management improvement,
infrastructural and financial enhancement, and community participation in waste
reduction activity
2. The second phase (2018-2022)
To strengthen environmental remediation, green products usage, and systematic waste
management
Household hazardous waste
According to the Waste Law (2012), hazardous waste is the waste that has
negative impacts on humans, animals, plants, and their descendants, is hazardous,
corrosive, flammable, explosive, contagious, radioactive, pollutes the environment
and can be solid, liquid, and gas state. In the law, the hazardous waste from industries
has to be separated from MSW and treated in a facility that has advanced technologies
to reduce the hazard. Once treated, the waste can be transferred in landfills (Waste
Law, 2012). However, the law does not legislate what is household hazardous waste
(HHW) and whether it is included in the definition of hazardous waste or not. Since
there is no legislation on HHW, the city has no segregation and sorting programs for
any HHW from municipal solid waste. Therefore, the UB city municipality has no
specific data on the annual HHW generation.
In the U.S., according to the EPA, regarding wastes generated by households
and household-like areas, “Leftover products that contain corrosive, toxic, ignitable,
or reactive ingredients are considered to be household hazardous waste.” Therefore,
HHW could be consumer electronic waste, old solvents, oil-based paints, batteries,
pesticides, fertilizers, or fluorescent lamps. In addition, medical sharps,
pharmaceuticals and poisons from households can contain toxic substances and heavy
metals (EPA, Non-hazardous waste report). Unlike Mongolia, the EPA specifies these
wastes as HHW.
Under the Waste Law (2012), there is no specific recycling target for HHW
and municipal solid waste and it states recycling and reusing processes are
recommended if producers are willing to do it. It is not a mandatory program;
18
therefore, manufacturers and importers have no incentive to recycle their products`
post-consumer waste.
WEEE contains potential hazardous heavy metals such as lead, mercury,
cadmium, and nickel; reusing and recycling the rare metals from e-waste would
reduce energy requirements for natural resource extraction and processing of crude
materials. According to Widmer et al (2005), 40 percent of consumer personal
computers end up in landfill and heavy metals from e-waste are 70 percent of the total
heavy metals in the U.S. landfills. Figure 7 illustrates the material compositions in e-
waste (Widmer et al, 2005).
Fig 7. Electronic waste compositions by weight
As shown in Figure 5, e-waste weight contains more than 50 percent metals, including
both ferrous and non-ferrous metals that could be recycled. The final JICA report
(2012) mentioned there are a few small e-waste recycling businesses in the city;
however, the recovery rate is only about 20 percent of e-waste generated. For
example, sometime individuals usually go to a computer shopping center to sell
broken personal computers or to purchase secondhand computers or recycled one.
In 2002, a new guideline for the medical waste separation, collection, storage,
transportation and final disposal was legislated by the Ministry of Health and the
Ministry of Environment of Mongolia. Under the law, the specific medical waste
includes blood from humans and animals during medical treatment, medicine and
related products, bioactive and radioactive products, syringes, and medical equipment
(Enactment 249/201, Ministers of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of
Environment, 2002). The enactment (249/201, 2002) states the specific medical waste
19
from national hospitals funded by the government is collected, stored, and treated by
tax revenue. However, waste from medicine and related products` in individual
households are not included in the law; therefore, pharmaceutical and medical waste
is mixed with municipal solid waste. The list below shows the situation and resulting
problems of HHW management in UB city:
• No specific HHW management and policy exists in UB city
• HHW is treated in the municipal solid waste facility
• There is no advanced technology in MSW treatment
• The primary treatment is incineration without controls
• After incomplete incineration, the waste mostly goes into landfills
Mongolia has specific laws, rules, and standards for industrial hazardous
waste management; however, there has been a lack of regulation for HHW and less
monitoring for industrial hazardous waste treatment. Due to not having advanced air
control technologies and landfill leachate systems in MSW treatment, the potential
hazard for human health is increased dramatically.
General EPR policy framework in developing countries:
Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia
Due to a variety of including cost benefit, restrictive regulation, and a lack of
recycling infrastructure, most of the waste such as e-waste, used tires and plastic
waste is transported from developed countries to China, India, Pakistan, and Nigeria
to final disposal (Schiannopkao and Wong, 2013). These waste-importing countries
may not have systematic waste regulations or advanced treatments; therefore,
treatment in these countries likely results in increased industrial pollution. For
example, “open burning of coated fires, heating of printed circuit boards to remove IC
chips, and acid baths for extracting gold” are well known in China (Kojima et al,
2009). Table 6 shows the amount of e-waste is exported and imported (Schiannopkao
and Wong, 2013).
Table 6. E-waste export and import
Countries
or region
Household waste
(millions of tons)
Exported
(millions of tons)
Imported
(millions of tons)
20
USA 8.4 2.3 -
EU 25 8.9 1.6 -
Japan 4.0 0.59 -
China 5.7 - 2.6
India 0.66 - 0.97
As seen in Table 6, there is no imported waste in developed countries; thus, importing
countries need to develop hazardous waste regulations and standards for preventing
human health risks caused by e-waste pollution.
• Legislation and restriction
Since Mongolia has no legislations/regulations or classifications on HHW and
less monitoring of industrial hazardous waste treatment, the government needs to
initiate classifying, regulating, and developing the EPR policy for hazardous waste
collection and treatment from consumers and manufacturers. Kaffine and O`Reilly
(2013) concluded the EPR program is suitable for consumers` e-waste, automobile
batteries, packaging, and tires. Figure 8 illustrates the products are covered by the
EPR policy in globally (Kaffine and O`Reilly, 2013).
Fig 8. EPR policy by product types
The “other” (20%) includes used oil, paints and related products, and pesticides
(Kaffine and O`Reilly, 2013). Mongolia could implement the EPR policy for e-waste
and automobile batteries, since both e-waste and imported vehicle parts such as
batteries has been increasing. In terms of developing the EPR program for hazardous
waste, the scope of the program, a consensus goal and target, objectives and
35%
11% 17%
17%
20% E-‐waste
Vehicle batteries
Tires
Packaging
Other
21
responsibilities must be determined clearly and understandably for each actor (OECD
guideline, 2001). Otherwise, there will be misunderstandings between government
agencies and producers; for instance, Brazil has faced many difficulties: less
supportive legislations and confusion on prohibition of imported tires to implement
the EPR policy for used tires (Milanes and Buhrs, 2009).
After the EU`s countries, Japan, Canada, and Switzerland successfully
implemented the EPR program for their waste management, some developing
countries are trying to embrace this policy. One of the biggest recycling countries,
China, has legislated “the management of waste household electrical and electronic
products recycling and disposal” with its content being both mandatory recycling of
WEEE: TV sets, refrigerators, washing machines, air conditioners, and personal
computers under the EPR policy, and certifying second hand products and recyclers
(Kojima, Yoshida, and Sasaki, 2009, Hicks, Dietmar and Eugster, 2005). Another
effective legislation in China is “management measure for the prevention of pollution
from electronic products.” The law restricts toxic substances from products, requires
labeling for hazardous materials, and promotes green products. (Hicks et al, 2005).
These restrictions are established in the EU RoHS and the WEEE Directive in terms
of hazardous substance restrictions and e-waste disposal. The following are the six
toxic chemicals for which China restricted usage in electronic products: “Lead,
mercury, chromium IV, cadmium, polybrominated biphenyls and polybrominated
diphenyl ethers” (Hicks et al, 2005).
Not only China but also several countries such as Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and
Brazil developed their EPR policy based on the EU WEEE Directive and RoHS;
therefore, these regulations could be valuable information and an important guideline
for Mongolia to implement the EPR policy at national level. Most electronic products
and automobile related products or second hand vehicles are imported to Mongolia
from China and Japan, respectively. Therefore, under the hazardous component
restriction of an EPR program, imported appliances are easy to monitor, control, and
ban through the custom office. Moreover, a tax increase on imported products could
be established based on the proportion of hazardous substances and recyclable content
to encourage usage of less environmental impactful products.
• Mandatory EPR program
22
Similar to other developing countries, Mongolia has many small importers and
family businesses, plus a few big importing companies; thus it can be seen the market
is not mature and most producers and importers likely will not be willing to comply
with a voluntary EPR policy due to the cost for collection, recycling, and final
disposal. Therefore, there should be the government involvement in the EPR program
as it relates to electronic product and automobile battery importers. According to the
OECD seminar on EPR in France in 2001, under the mandatory program, the free
rider problem is going to decrease, and higher collection and recycling rates are more
achievable compared to the voluntary program. Moreover setting a collection target is
an effective way to meeting the target; for example, in Belgium this way has
increased collector`s responsibility for batteries under the mandatory EPR program
(OECD seminar, 2001). In the voluntary EPR policy, there have been free rider issues
caused by non-participating producers and the competitive disadvantages for member
companies compared to the non-participants. Furthermore, several benefits of the
mandatory EPR program run by the government (OECD guideline, 2001, Nnorom
and Osibanjo, 2008) include the following:
• Eliminating hazardous substances and improving Designed for the
Environment products
• Clarifying the producer`s financial responsibility
• Implementing EPR supportive policies
• Raising awareness of the policy
• Establishing mandatory targets for the collection and recycling to promote
technological innovations
It could be both more flexible and time consuming for waste compliance and
permission if the EPR program is mandatory because city authorities and different
government agencies have a consensus national regulation and rule that are easily
spread throughout the country. This leads to less confusion between the government
and producers.
Mayers (2007) mentioned that if there are no targets and specified treatment
requirements, the policy does not send a direct and clear signal to manufacturers. For
example, it should clarify in the WEEE Directive what kind of separation treatment
would need to be used if LCD backlights contain mercury (Mayers, 2007). Therefore,
23
under the mandatory EPR program, the government could provide general treatment
requirements, standards, and specific methods for recycling and final disposal in order
to increase efficiency and reduce company investment in treatment. A guidance
document or manual can be discussed and developed between producers and
government agencies to satisfy both party`s demands.
• Producer Responsibility Organization:
In terms of post-consumer waste treatment, individual producers and
importers are not able to handle all the required processing in Mongolia due to a lack
of technical equipment, qualified employees, and an efficient collection system. The
same situation is occurring in China and other developing countries, where individual
collection and treatment systems are not feasible (Nnorom and Osibanjo, 2008).
Therefore, PROs become an integral part of the EPR program in these locations
because they can address these limitations. Also, PROs can treat a broader type of
products than individual manufacturers, especially when those individual
manufacturers/processors are small family businesses. Finally, the PRO can save time
and reduce the cost of recycling and final disposal (Spicer and Johnson, 2004).
Therefore, the EPR policy would require all the actors to join a PRO that is funded by
a member companies` annual fee. The fee should be based on their market share,
products` size, weight, and hazardous substances, because a flat fee does not promote
waste reduction in general and a gap between small businesses and larger group
companies is expanding in Mongolia. Further, the flat fee penalizes the companies
that improved their products in relation to their environmental impact. These
producers in a PRO are not going to receive any financial benefits from the EPR
program (McKerlie et al, 2006).
In developed countries such as Japan, Germany, and Switzerland, most of
PRO activities are fully dependent on participating company`s funds and recycling
fees from consumers; however, in Mongolia, this system may not work successfully.
The recycling fees paid by consumers are a particular challenge. Consumers are
unlikely to accept the rule since the country`s GDP per capita (US $11,508.98 in
2014) is much lower than the European countries (GDP per capita US $32,789 in Dec
2014) (Trading economics). Therefore, in a developing country like Mongolia, using
the advanced recycling fee and the end-of-life fee from consumers could be
24
challenging if they are the only revenue sources to fund a PRO. Moreover, e-waste
may be disposed to informal recycling factories since it has valuable metals and is
useful for reuse in secondhand electronic products. For the above the reasons, the
PRO operation requires municipal participation, especially in waste collection and
transportation, because the municipality already has the collection operation and the
PRO likely does not have the funding to establish a second collection and transport
system. Since UB city`s municipality has waste storage locations, developed
transportation and collection system, and waste return locations, incorporating the
municipality into the EPR program will reduce costs for building infrastructure. In
fact, in some countries such as the United Kingdom, China, and Taiwan, a local
municipality is responsible for the collection, separation, and transportation of HHW
(He et al., 2006, Nnorom and Osibanjo, 2008).
Further, the Ulaanbaatar city authority could allow PROs to use disposal
facilities and collection centers for recycling, which gives producers and importers a
feasible management location for waste treatment. Therefore, unlike other
developing country`s cases, PROs (producer and importers) would be responsible for
only recycling and final disposal. For the recycling processes, PROs would need to
cooperate with informal small recycling businesses to develop efficient waste
treatment. This is because the secondhand products especially used tires, vehicles, and
personal computers are still valuable in the market; therefore, many small family-
owned companies have been operating in the city. These small businesses must be
included in the PRO because the technologies used in this informal recycling sector
are not environmentally friendly and not meeting with the country`s standards. The
PROs could provide the International Organization and Standardization standard
technologies and advanced equipment for recycling. In terms of the waste handling
processes, PROs should not have brand-specific rules in a developing country like
Mongolia because the market itself is small comparing with developed countries and
there is not enough fund for each brand`s post-consumer waste, especially personal
computers, televisions, and refrigerators.
Under the full industry-responsible EPR waste management program, there is
a direct feedback loop from the recycling processes to the manufacturing or product
design phases. This could allow designers to change product`s recyclability and to use
25
alternative materials. On the other hand, in the PRO system, especially one not
focused on specific brands, there is no direct feedback loop and feedback from PROs
may not be an effective influence on a product design (OECD, 2001, Spicer and
Johnson, 2004). To avoid this problem, PROs should report regularly to
manufacturers and importers to discuss improvement of a material design and
alternative importing products that are more recyclable and/or that have less
environmental impacts. A brief potential structure of cooperation of a PRO and the
municipality in Mongolia is shown in Figure 9.
Fig 9. PROs and municipal participation in the EPR program (Mongolia)
• Monitoring by a third party
The OECD guidance (2001) stated the EPR program has to be monitored and
reported by a third party to improve quality and efficiency. One of the key reasons
for the successful EPR policy in Canada is that it addresses needs, evaluates
performances, and tracks operations. In British Columbia, an annual audited report
including recovery rate, revenues, and cost is submitted by the third party (Driedger,
2002), which means there will be no outside pressure. In Mongolia, the General
Agency of Specialized Inspection (GASI) is in charge of overall inspections, risk
assessment of health, and occupational safety. Therefore, the third party could be the
GASI or a NPO. In Mongolia, the importance of having the third party in the EPR
system is to monitor PRO operations and treatment technologies, and to report to the
26
customs office about more suitable imported products having less hazardous
substances. Based on the valuable feedback from the third party, the national
guideline for imported products under the EPR policy will be improved with the
needs for different stakeholders being clearly addressed. Monitoring both the sale of
products as well as HHW in treatment facilities is one of the effective ways of
determining the EPR policy achievement (Driedger, 2002).
• Awareness of the EPR policy
Increasing the number of recycled products and materials in the market is
essential in order to achieve the EPR program goals. The market-driven program is
only effective for highly valuable recovered material; however, there is less valuable
material that has a high environmental impact. Therefore, some level of government
intervention is needed for increasing the use of recycled materials. In China, the
Government Procurement Law was legislated and implemented in 2003 to promote
purchasing and using green products in all government agencies. According to this
law, the purchased products must meet Chinese environmental protection standards
(Qiao and Wang, 2007). Table 7 shows energy saving by using recycled materials
instead of raw materials (Nnorom and Osibanjo, 2008).
Table 7. Energy saving from recycled materials
Material Energy saving (%)
Aluminum 95
Copper 85
Plastic >80
Iron and steel 74
Lead 65
Paper 64
Zinc 60
One of the ways of improving consumer awareness in HHW is by producers
labeling their products based on hazardous components and recycled material
proportions. The labels on hazardous components in products should include
information about potential toxicity and requirements for specific treatment. This will
raise consumer awareness of hazardous waste collection, recycling, and treatment. For
27
instance, under the EU Battery Directive, all batteries containing hazardous chemicals
are required to be labeled “with crossed-out wheelie bin and chemical symbols”
(Mayers, 2007). Figure 10 shows the labels (Energizer, 2009). Moreover, this label on
products can be a tool for promotion of green purchases. The labels and
advertisements are producer`s responsibilities and the campaigns could be funded by
PROs.
Fig10. EU Battery Directive (labels)
Another way to increase consumer awareness of green products is
environmental education in public schools and advertising of green purchases through
television, radio, and newspaper. In Mongolia, the national broadcasting television
and public radio stations funded by the government should campaign for new
legislated policies and regulations, and against the environmental pollution caused by
HHW and effects on human health. Moreover, if producers and importers comply
with the EPR policy, the Mongolian National Broadcaster could advertise their
products and services for free through its environmental programs, could promote
companies` participation in the EPR program, and increase companies` social
responsibility. In Japan, children in kindergarten learn how to sort PET into the proper
trashcans. According to the elementary school curriculum in Mongolia (Minister
enactment, A/311, the Ministry of Education and Science of Mongolia, 2013), a
program about human interaction with the environment that extents until sixth grade.
The program includes natural phenomenon, the earth and the solar systems, plant and
fruit growths, forest, and atmospheric movement, etc. The program does not cover
practical activities to increase environmental awareness; however, practical programs
in the education system are necessary in both public and private elementary schools.
28
Chapter 3
MERCURY RISK ASSESSMENT
Chapter 3 will identify current disposal methods, typically incineration, for
fluorescent bulbs containing elemental mercury in UB city. Given these disposal
technologies and the estimated releases mercury from the disposal into the
atmosphere, the risk of potential mercury exposure from municipal waste incineration
will be analyzed. The human health risk characterization part will focus on only
neurological risks for children by airborne exposure of elemental mercury vapor
(inhalation).
Mercury exposure from MSW incineration Mercury exposure from MSW incineration is from batteries such as Hg-Cd
and Hg-Zn batteries, electric lighting such as fluorescent lamps and high intensity
discharge lamps, and dental amalgam (Velzen, Langenkamp, and Herb, 2002). In
1990 in the U.S., 70 percent of all produced mercury could be found in the waste
stream, which means 600 – 800 tons of mercury was disposed per year. At that time,
the total amount of MSW in the U.S. was around 200 million tons per year with 3-4
mg of mercury per kg waste (Velzen et al., 2002). According to Velzen et al (2002),
mercury in MSW treatment in the U.S. between 1991-1992 is illustrated in Table 8.
Table 8. Mercury sources in MSW
Batteries 67.3%
Fluorescent lamps 9.0%
Thermostats 8.7%
Plastics 5.4%
Latex paint residues 4.8%
Miscellaneous 2.9%
Food, paper 1.9%
In 1996, the Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act
was enacted, which banned mercuric oxide batteries in the U.S.; since then, the
29
mercury component in the waste stream (7.12 ton in 2010) has been decreasing and
non-mercury alternative batteries like alkaline manganese oxide batteries, alkaline
batteries, lithium ion button cell batteries and silver oxide batteries have increased in
market share (IMERC, Mercury use in Batteries, 2014). Li et al (2010) mentioned that
in China, mercury batteries have been decreasing in use since 2001; however, 153
tons of mercury was used in batteries in 2004.
Unlike mercury-containing batteries, the usage of fluorescent bulbs has been
increasing globally in recent years because of their energy efficiency and reduced
greenhouse gas emissions comparing with traditional incandescent lamps. In the U.S.
and EU, there is a ban on incandescent on (Lim, Kang, Oguseitan, and Schoenung,
2013). The similar growing pattern of fluorescent lamp (FL) use can be seen in
Ulaanbaatar city due to government promotion of FL usage in offices and public
places. However, the energy-efficient compact FLs have a potential mercury exposure
hazard. The mechanism of lighting up compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) can be
described as “the alternating current (AC) is used to make electrons collide with
mercury atoms to release ultraviolet (UV) light, which is changed to visible light
through the phosphor coating on the inside of the glass tube” (Lim et al., 2013). A
general structure of compact FLs is illustrated in following Figure 11 (Lim et al.,
2013).
Fig 11. Compact FL driver
AC: Alternating current, EMI: Electromagnetic interface, IC: Integrated current
30
There have been the different amount of mercury and its amalgams in CFLs;
for instance, Raposo and Roeser (2001) mentioned that “the average amount of
mercury per lamp is being reported as 20.62 mg of Hg/lamp” in Brazilian fluorescent
lamp manufacturers. Based on their estimation, 1000 kg of Hg per year is released
into the environment in Brazil due to mercury-containing used lamps (Raposo and
Roeser, 2001). In the United States, “…according to the Association of Lighting and
Mercury Recyclers, approximately 670 million fluorescent bulbs were disposed of or
recycled in the United States in 2003.” (EPA, Fluorescent Lamp Recycling, 2009).
Due to an increase in usage of fluorescent lamps, in 2009 annually two to four tons of
mercury from FLs is released into the atmosphere in the U.S. (EPA, Fluorescent
Lamp Recycling, 2009). In China, approximately 200 tons of mercury is used in
fluorescent lamps and thermometers in each year. Over 90 percent of mercury
containing products end up in the MSW stream for treatment (Li et al., 2010).
The amount of mercury in a lamp is based on lamp types (Linear or CFL), a
brand, and wattage. Table 9 shows the amount of mercury in different kind of
fluorescent lamps (Nance, Patterson, Willis, Foronda, and Dourson, 2012).
Table 9. Mercury containing lamps
Country or region Lamp type Mercury (mg/lamp)
Europe Halophosphate lamps 10
Europe Triphosphate lamps 5-8
Canada Linear fluorescent tubes 3-50
USA Linear fluorescent tubes 1.4-50 (a) 0-100 (b)
Australia CFL 0.1-13
Canada CFL 1-25
United Kingdom CFL <10
USA CFL Avg. 4
USA CFL 5-50 (b)
a: Culver, 2008, b: NEWMOA
31
Globally, the main forms of total mercury emission to the atmosphere are
gaseous elemental mercury (53%) and divalent mercury (37%). Carpi (1996) states
that, in general, 20-50 percent of elemental mercury (Hg0) and 50-80 percent of
divalent mercury (Hg II) result from coal combustion; and 10-20 percent of Hg0 and
75-85 percent of Hg (II) result from municipal waste incineration. For instance,
according to the EPA Emission Test Report (EPA/600/SR-93/181), the concentration
of mercury in Camden county MSW stack is 100-1000 µg/m3, all of which is divalent
mercury. With the exhaust steam, elemental mercury reacts with HCl and Cl2 or is
oxidized into HgO. Increasing the temperature and the concentration of HCl and Cl2
results in higher concentrations of oxidized mercury compounds and mercuric
chloride (HgCl) (Carpi, 1996). HCl and Cl2 are produced from chlorine-containing
plastic products in waste stream.
Studies in China showed that MSW incineration resulted in 94.39 percent of
mercury being in the fly ash (Zhou et al., 2015) and around 4 percent of the total
mercury is in the bottom ash (Carpi, 1996). According to Zhou et al (2015), the
average concentration of total mercury in fly ash from 15 different samples is 10
mg/kg; however, the total mercury in 7 samples from eastern China had a much
higher than the average concentration (10 mg/kg). Zhou et al (2015) mentioned this is
because rapid economic growth in that area led to an increase in mercury components
in MSW. Table 9 shows different forms of mercury emissions from waste
incineration in North America and Asia. As seen in Table 10, in both regions, divalent
mercury emission in gas state is dominant (E. G. Pacyna and J. M. Pacyna, 2002).
Table 10. Mercury emissions from waste incineration
North America Asia
Gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0)
13.3 ton 6.5 ton
Gaseous divalent mercury (Hg (II))
39.5 ton 19.6 ton
Particulate mercury 13.3 ton 6.5 ton
32
In UB city, FLs from offices and consumer usages are disposed into MSW
stream. Based on different studies (Carpi, 1996, Zhou et al. 2015, E. G. Pacyna and J.
M. Pacyna, 2002), gaseous elemental and divalent mercury in MSW fly ash is a major
way for mercury to be released into the environment. Therefore this exposure is the
main pathway in UB city; moreover, the city`s solid waste disposal methods are open
burning or landfilling after incomplete incineration. Aucott et al (2003) estimated a
typical broken fluorescent bulb containing approximately 20 mg of mercury releases
3-8 mg of mercury in two weeks. Moreover, they found during FLs final disposal and
recycling processes approximately 1-80 percent of the total mercury is released from
the bulbs (Aucott et al., 2003). Another study (Johnson et al., 2008) reported that the
13W FL released 30 percent (1.34mg) of the total amount of mercury in the bulb, and
old lamps tend to release less mercury than a new one (Nance et al., 2012).
Figure 12 shows the map of the former municipal landfill in UB city, which is
close to residents and the location is 47°56'42"N 106°56'54"E (wikimapia). On the
map, every white dot represents Mongolian traditional house that has a stove inside
and it burns coal to heat the house in cold winter (average temperature in winter from
-33.4C to -18.9C) (WeatherSpark, Average Weather for Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia).
Fig 12. The former MSW facility
33
Figure 13 shows how close the former MSW facility is to the city (center of UB city
coordination: 47°55'13"N 106°55'2"E). The facility was located in the northeast part
of the city and up in the mountains. In the city, the annual average wind direction is
from the northern side (23%) and the northwest side (16%) for a total of 39 percent,
which means 61 percent of the annual wind comes from the northern side
(WeatherSpark, Average Weather for Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia).
Fig 13. The MSW facility location and the city center
This landfill was overwhelmed with the waste load and was closed due to the amount
of waste from consumers and industries and a lack of land for disposal. Even though
it is closed currently, the main treatment for the waste is open burning and then
disposal in a landfill. Based on the average amount of 20 mg mercury (Raposo and
Roeser, 2001, Aucott et al., 2003) in a fluorescent lamp, the total amount of mercury
in imported FLs into the country can be estimated. However, it is not possible to
determine the amount of FLs in the city because the customs office manages and
reports only the total amount of imported lamps nationwide. Therefore, the amount of
FLs in UB city is estimated based on population, where at least half of the populace
lives in the city. Because of urbanization and population in the capital city, this risk
assessment assumes approximately 60 percent of the total FLs are used in UB city.
Aucott, McLinden, and Winka (2003) showed that when the temperature is between
5-30°C, approximately 17-40% of the mercury is volatilized from a broken
fluorescent lamp during a two-week period; therefore, open burning of FLs in the
34
MSW facility will accelerate gaseous mercury emission into atmosphere. Table 11
shows the total amount of FLs and of mercury released from FLs in the MSW
treatment.
Table 11. The amount of mercury released into the atmosphere
Average imported FLs Mercury in the imported FLs
Mercury released into air
National 6447874×103 yr 20mgHg×6447874×103
=128957480×103 mg/yr 90%×128957.48kg =116,061.73 kg/yr
Ulaanbaatar city
6447874×103×60%=3868724×103yr
20mgHg×3868724×103
=77374488×103 mg/yr 90%×77374.488kg= 69,637 kg/yr
The elemental mercury vapor and divalent mercury exposure pathways are shown in
Figure 14. As seen in the figure, the most of divalent mercury vapor is deposited in
regional and local areas; therefore, residents who live near to the MSW incineration
are at greater risk of developing detrimental health effects by inhalation of mercury
vapors.
Fig 14. The metallic mercury airborne exposure pathway
35
Hazard Identification
Physical and chemical properties of elemental mercury
Mercury is a transition metal, so it has different valence electrons, which
result in various complex compounds such as mercuric (II) chloride (HgCl2) mercury
(I) chloride (Hg2Cl2), and mercuric (II) acetate (HgC4H6O4) (Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR), 1999). Since elemental and inorganic
(metallic) mercury are the main forms inside FLs, this chapter and risk calculation
will focus on only their characteristics. Elemental and divalent mercury`s physical
and chemical properties are in Table 12 (ASTDR, 1999).
Table 12. Physical and chemical properties of mercury
Characteristic Mercury Mercuric (II)
chloride
Mercury (I)
chloride
Chemical formula Hg HgCl2 Hg2Cl2
EPA hazardous
waste
U151; D009 D009 No data
Molecular weight 200.59 271.52 472.09
Color Silver white (liquid
metal) tin white
(solid)
White White
Physical state Heavy, liquid metal Crystal, granule or
powder
Heavy powder,
rhombic crystal
Melting point -38.87°C 277°C 302C
Boiling point 356.72°C 302°C 384C
Odor Odorless Odorless Odorless
Solubility in water 0.28µmoles/L at
25°C
1 g/35ml,
6.9g/100cc at 20°C
2.0×10-4g/100ml at
25°C
Solubility in
organic solvents
2.7mg/pentane,
soluble in lipids
1g/3.8ml alcohol,
1g/200ml C6H6,
1g/22ml ether
1g/12ml glycerol
Insoluble in
alcohol, ether
LogKow 5.95 No data No data
36
Vapor pressure 2×10-3mm Hg at
25°C
1mm Hg at 136°C No data
Henry`s law
constant at 24.8°C
No data No data No data
Degradation
reaction rate
constant
Gas-phase reaction
with ozone 1.7×10-
18 cm3/mol/s
No data No data
As shown in Table 12, elemental mercury (Hg0) has a high vapor pressure at
room temperature, which means that, during burning processes in a MSW plant, it is
easily vaporized to the atmosphere and becoming highly toxic gas. Hg0 is soluble in
lipids so it is stored in fatty tissues in humans and animals. Due to low water
solubility, the residence time Hg0 in atmosphere is 0.5-2.0 years (Carpi, 1996). In
general divalent mercuric salts are soluble in water; for instance, waster solubility of
mercuric (II) chloride is 1g/35ml H2O (ASTDR, 1999, and Bose-O`Reilly et al.,
2010).
Toxicology: Neurological effects in humans According to the Toxicological Profile for Mercury (ASTDR, 1999),
inhalation exposure is the primary route of concern for metallic mercury vapor
(elemental mercury) “70%-85% of inhaled mercury vapor is absorbed by the lungs
into the bloodstream” (Bose-O`Reilly et al., 2010). The main organs for the elemental
mercury exposure are the lung, kidneys, and the central nervous system.
Several studies have mentioned that a high level of mercury vapor can lead to death in
humans, which means the acute exposure (14 days or less) of mercury is highly toxic
(ASTDR, 1999). “Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) are derived for acute (1–14 days),
intermediate (15–364 days), and chronic (365 days and longer) durations and for the
oral and inhalation routes of exposure.” Table 16 shows Lowest-Observed-Adverse-
Effect Levels (LOAELs) and No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Levels (NOAELs) for
chronic exposure to mercury for some animals and humans (ASTDR, 1999).
37
Table 13. NOAEL and LOAEL of animals and humans
Species Exposure duration System NOAEL
Rat 71wk
5d/wk
7hr/d
Renal 0.1 mg/m3
Dog 83wk
5d/wk
7hr/d
Renal 0.1 mg/m3
Rabbit 83 wk
5d/wk
7hr/d
Renal 0.1 mg/m3
Species Exposure duration System LOAEL
Human 1-5yr Neurological 0.076 mg/m3
(Male)
Human 1-41yr (mean:
15.3yr)
Neurological 0.026 mg/m3
(Male)
Human 0.7-24yr Neurological 0.014 mg/m3
According to the toxicology profile for mercury (ASTDR, 1999),“The central nervous
system is probably the most sensitive target organ for metallic mercury vapor
exposure”. McFarland and Reigel (1978) showed that exposure (less than 8 hours) to
elemental mercury vapor concentration at 44 mg/m3 gave workers “long-lasting
feelings of irritability, lack of ambition, and lack of sexual desire” (Toxicology profile
for mercury, 1999).
Based on Table 13 data, Figure 15 illustrates neurological and renal effects on both
humans and animals due to chronic exposure of elemental mercury vapor (ASTDR,
1999).
38
Fig 15. Dose – renal and neurological effects of mercury airborne exposure
At high concentrations of mercury vapor exposure over 2 days, a “54-year-old man
exhibited a syndrome resembling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, characterized by
slowed conduction velocities (suggestive of peripheral nerve damage)” (Toxicology
profile for mercury, 1991). According to Rowens (1991), low-level chronic exposure
to elemental mercury affects the neurologic system resulting in “symptoms of tremor,
neuropathy, and changes in personality referred to as mercurial erethism” (ASTDR,
1991).
The toxicology profile for mercury (ASTDR, 1991) states “…chronic-duration
exposures to metallic mercury vapor have resulted in tremors (which may be mild or
severe depending on the degree of exposure), unsteady walking, irritability, poor
concentration, short-term memory deficits, tremulous speech, blurred vision,
performance decrements in psychomotor skills (e.g., finger tapping, reduced hand-eye
coordination), paresthesias, decreased nerve conduction, and other signs of
neurotoxicity.” Figure 15 shows the mercury vapor concentration in the air and its
human neurological effects (Friberg, WHO, 1991).
39
Fig 16. Dose-response of elemental mercury vapor exposure (inhalation)
Mercury vapor concentration (mg/m3) 1: Control group, 2: <0.01-0.05, 3: 0.06-0.1, 4:
0.11-0.14, 5: 0.24-0.27
Metallic mercury vapor can damage on the kidneys and respiratory systems in
humans. The following shows the effects on these systems.
1. Renal effects
The proximal tubules are the major target in the kidneys. A study shows (NTP,
1993) mice were given 20 mg Hg/kg/day in five days in a week increased “kidney
weights at 3.7 mg Hg/kg/day and acute renal necrosis at 59 mg Hg/kg/day” (ASTDR,
1999). Due to a high dose exposure of elemental mercury, the tubular cells are not
able to regenerate, meaning the function of the kidneys is going to fail (ASTDR,
1999). The study (Nielsen et al. 1991) on mice shows 10mg/Hg/kg of mercuric
chloride led damages to renal tubular cells (ASTDR, 1999).
2. Respiratory Effects
Several studies have reported death in humans following acute exposure to
high concentrations of elemental mercury vapor (Campbell 1948; Kanluen and
Gottlieb 1991; Matthes et al. 1958; Rowens et al. 1991; Soni et al. 1992; Taueg et al.
1992; Teng and Brennan 1959; Tennant et al. 1961). The deaths were correlated to
respiratory failure due to high-level exposure of mercury. The common symptoms are
“cough, dyspnea, and tightness or burning pains in the chest” (ASTDR, 1999).
According to the Mercury toxicology profile (1999), the lungs exposed to mercury
vapor show “diffuse infiltrates or pneumonitis” and “impaired pulmonary function.”
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5
Sym
ptom
s (%
)
Nervous disorders
40
Risk Characterization
Elemental mercury risk calculation
1. Mercury concentration in the air
The total amount of mercury in the air (Table 10) is estimated to be 69,637kg
Hg/yr (190,786.30g Hg/d). To estimate the mercury concentration in air, this
assessment used the mean yearly mixing height over the urban area since municipal
solid waste is burned outside in the city. Therefore, we need to have the total volume
of air around the former MSW. Chen et al (2012) used the zone of 0-500m distance
from the pollutant source (the lead-acid battery recycling factory) as a pollutant area;
therefore, the zone can be used in our risk calculation is approximately within the 500
m radius. The actual 500 m radius from the former MSW plant is illustrated in Figure
17.
Fig 17. The pollutant zone within the 500 m radius
Several studies have used average mixing heights to calculate pollutant concentrations
in urban areas, as shown in Table 14 (Holzworht, U.S. EPA, 1972; Benarie, 1974).
UB city`s has an annual average wind velocity of 8.1 mile per hour (3.62 meter per
second) (WheatherSpark), which is close to the mean wind speed in Tokyo (3.7 m/s)
41
so this assessment used Tokyo as the example city for the assumptions of a mixing
height of 830m (±100m) (Benarie, 1974).
Table 14. The mean wind velocity and average mixing height
Cities Mean wind velocity
(meter per second)
Average mixing height
Los Angeles 2.14 m/s * 680 m
New York 5.45 m/s * 1060-1080 m
Las Vegas 4.06 m/s * 1382 m
Pittsburg 3.97 m/s * 1010 m
Washington D.C. 4.2 m/s * 1049 m
Paris 4.1 m/s 690 m
Bordeaux 3.1 m/s 745 m
Tokyo 3.7 m/s 830 m
Osaka 2.9 m/s 920 m
Lyon 3.3 m/s 620 m
Ulaanbaatar 3.62 m/s 830m (±100m) * Wind-spees.weatherdb.com
Based on the mixing height (Table 20) and the radius of the polluted zone (Figure 17),
the total volume of the contaminated area is:
V= πr2h = 65155×104 m3
Therefore, the mercury concentration per day in the contaminated area is:
Hg concentration = MassVolume
= 190,786.30g Hg65,155×104 m3
= 0.2928mg Hg/m3
2. Chronic exposure of neurological damages in humans (Table 2)
Exposure duration: 0.7-24yr
LOAEL concentration: 0.014 mg/m3
3. Reference concentration (RfC)
RfC = LOAELUF
UF (Uncertainty Factor): 100
RfC = 0.014 mg/m3
100 = 0.00014 mg/m3
42
4. Chronic daily intake (CDI) by inhalation
CDI = CA×IR×ET×EF×ED
BW×AT
CA: Contaminant concentration in air: 0.2928mg Hg/m3
IR: Inhalation rate: 0.019m3/hr (children)
ET: Exposure time: 12hr/day (only daytime)
EF: Exposure frequency: 365d/yr (MSW treatment operation time)
ED: Exposure duration: 70yr (lifetime exposure)
BW: Body weight: 33kg (6-12yr children)
AT: Averaging time: 365d/yr×70yr
CDI1= 0.2928mg Hg/m3×0.019m3/hr×12hr/d×365d/yr×70yr
33kg×365d/yr×70yr
CDI1=0.00202 mg/kg/d
When exposure time is 24hr per a day, chronic daily intake is:
CDI2=0.00404 mg/kg/d
5. Hazard Quotient (HQ)
HQ= CDIRfC
HQ1= 0.00202 mg/kg/d0.00014 mg/m3
= 14.42
HQ2= 0.00404 mg/kg/d0.00014 mg/m3
= 28.85
The both hazard quotients are bigger than one meaning there is a potential hazard for
children`s neurological damages.
43
Chapter 4
LEAD RISK ASSESSMENT
Chapter 4 will analyze and summarize current recycling methods and
technologies for used lead-acid vehicle batteries containing lead in UB city. The last
part of the chapter will cover the lead hazard identification and risk calculation based
on the airborne exposure for lead from used LABs recycling factories. Even though
the main health concerns of lead toxicity is the nervous system, to identify health
effects for different organisms the renal effects on children will be discussed in
toxicology of the hazard identification.
Lead exposure from lead-acid battery recycling factors Lead-acid batteries are used for various, such as powering/starting heavy
trucks, buses, boats, and backup power for building lightings and electronic
equipment. In 2015, the total lead production in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico is
estimated to be 2,090,000 tons. In this estimation, recycled lead consumption is
approximately 86 percent (1,800,000 tons) of all lead consumption (Queneau, Leiby
and Robinson, 2015). Moreover, 100 million lead acid car batteries were sold in the
U.S. and Canada in 1999 and 1,000,000 tons of lead were used for these automobile
batteries in the U.S. at the same time. Total usage of recycled lead in the U.S. was 76
percent of all produced lead in 1999 (Commission for Environmental Cooperation,
2007). According to the estimation, by 2015, lead from used lead-acid batteries will
account for 95 percent of total recycled lead in North America (Queneau et al.
2015). Battery industries use more than 75 percent of all lead consumption globally.
Table 15 shows the consumption of lead for batteries in different countries (Basel
Convention and UNEP report, 2003).
Table 15. Consumption of lead for batteries (1993)
Country Percentage
U.S. 83
Japan 69
France 65
44
Germany 56
Italy 46
UK 34
In China, there are approximately three hundred lead recycling plants in 2013
and most of them are located in Jiangsu, Shandong, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Hebei, and
Anhui provinces. These recycling factories produce 80 percent of all lead production
in China. The annual lead consumption for lead-acid batteries from secondary lead
was approximately 60 tons in 2000 and it has been increased by approximately 100
tons in 2010 (Zhang, 2013).
There are different types of batteries based on their purpose; however, as
shown in Figure 18, a typical lead-acid battery has positive and negative terminals,
sulfuric acid solution, positive and negative plates, and plate separators (Basel
Convention and UNEP, 2003).
Fig 18. Internal structure of a lead-acid battery
“(1) and (2): terminals made of lead; (3): one for each battery element, where
distillated/deionized water can be replaced; (4): made of lead that makes electrical
contact between plates of same polarity; (5) and (11): originally made of ebonite, but
now more commonly made from either polypropylene or co-polymer; (6): the
electrolyte of the battery; (7): usually a part of the box, provide chemical and
electrical isolation between the electrical elements; (8): made of PVC or other porous
45
materials, avoid physical contact between two contiguous plates but, at the same time,
allowing free movement of ions in the electrolyte solution; (9): constituted by a
metallic lead grid covered by a lead dioxide (PbO2) paste; (10): constituted by
metallic lead plates; (11): a series of negative and positive plates;” (Basel Convention
and UNEP report, 2003).
In the positive terminals, lead dioxide (PbO2) is converted to lead sulfate (PbSO4) and
in the negative terminals, elemental lead is converted into lead sulfate (PbSO4).
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) acts as the electrolyte, providing the SO4- ion to both reactions.
The chemical reaction in a lead battery is seen in Figure 19 (Basel Convention and
UNEP report, 2003 and Vest, 2002).
Fig 19. The chemical reaction in a lead-acid battery
After the discharge-recharge process, the lead dioxide (PbO2) plates become
contaminated by lead sulfate (PbSO4), resulting in the eventual loss of the ability to
operate. . In the bottom of the battery, “a sludge layer” containing 55-60 percent of
PbSO4, 20-25 percent of PbO2, 1-5 percent of PbO, and 1-5 percent of metallic Pb
develops (Basel Convention and UNEP report, 2003).
The lead-containing component varies based on the brand, battery size, and
usage or purpose. Generally the amount of lead is approximately 60 percent to 80
percent of the weight of a lead-acid battery. “An average automobile battery weights
17.2 kg, and contains 8.6-9.1kg of lead” (Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response, EPA, 1992). Lead percentages in varies types of batteries are shown in
Table 16 (Basel Convention and UNEP report, 2003 and Vest 2002).
Table 16. Lead components in automobile batteries
Battery type Lead component Total weight
12V-44Ah-210A-starter battery in a
hard rubber casing
58.8% (8.82 kg) 15kg
12V-44Ah-210A-starter battery in a 63.9% (8.62kg) 13-14 kg
46
PP casing
12V-44Ah-220A vehicular battery 63.2% (8.4kg) 13.3 kg
As seen in table 13, the battery`s lifetime varies in different countries and
regions; typically in developing countries, it averages 20-24 months. The useful life
of batteries depends on different factors such as: “incomplete charging process;
remaining too long without use, hot weather, deep discharging process, and low
electrolyte level “ (Basel Convention and UNEP report, 2003). As seen in Table 17,
India estimates that its battery lifetime is 1.8 years, which may be a result of the
quality of the batteries and the extreme hot weather.
Table17. Lifetime of automobile batteries (1995)
Country/Region Lifetime (yr)
Western Europe 5.3
Canada 5.0
Japan 4.5
Australia 3.1
USA 3.0
Brazil 2.4
India 1.8
Based on the above estimation (Table 12), 60 percent (8kg) in a weight of an
automobile battery in Mongolia can be considered as lead. Generally, Mongolia
imports most of its automobiles from Japan due to their high fuel efficiency. UB city
covers 0.3 percent (4704.4 km2) of all the land of Mongolia; however, due to the
rapid urbanization, in 2014, 60.9 percent (411,408) of all vehicles including buses,
trucks, and automobiles are in the city (Ulaanbaatar city Traffic Police, 2014).
According to Table 13, the lifetime of lead-acid batteries in Mongolia can be
estimated to be 2 years; therefore, a half of the total vehicles in the city will dispose of
used lead-acid batteries (LABs). Based on the above estimation, the total discharge of
lead from used LABs per year in UB city is shown in Table 18.
47
Table 18. The annual amount of lead from LABs (Ulaanbaatar city)
Total automobile
batteries in UB city
(2014)
Total amount Pb in
automobile batteries in UB
city
Discharge of Pb based on
battery lifetime
411,408 411,408×8kg=3,291,264kg 3291264×0.5=1,645,632 kg/yr
According to Table 18, approximately 1645 tons of lead only from vehicle
batteries is going to be disposed in every year in the city. In Mongolia, several small-
scale recycling lead-acid battery factories exist throughout the country; however, the
specific data and information about the recycling process is not publicly available due
to the company`s secret processes. The lack of information means that the treatment
or lack of treatment cannot be determined. According to our interviews (2015) of
automobile importers and small repair businesses in UB city, most of the recycling
factories are in the countryside where the inspection and environmental regulations
are less restrictive than in the city. Therefore, we assume that the recycling process in
Mongolia is similar to a general process of used LABs recycling in developing
countries. Figure 20 shows the recycling stages of a lead-acid battery in general
(Vest, 2002).
Fig 20. Typical recycling process of used LABs in developing countries
As shown in Figure 20, after dismantling the batteries, the grids and lead pastes are
separated in the screening stage and processed individually because grids are in metal
48
stages. Therefore, the metallurgical process for converting grids (PbO/PbSO4) to pure
lead (Pb) can be shortened and it is melted at 500°C (Vest, 2002). Gas emission
control devices are not installed in most of small factories due to financial constraints
and less environmental regulation and monitoring in Mongolia; therefore, potential
hazardous gas emissions and particulates with Pb, Sb, As, and SO2 could be emitted to
the atmosphere during the smelting and refining processes (Vest, 2002 and Basel
Convention and UNEP report, 2003). Lead contaminant dusts from furnaces can
contain up to 65 percent of lead. During the manual battery breaking process, acid
electrolyte and lead contaminated dust can be emitted directly to the environment.
Moreover, an average approximately 300-350kg of slag per ton of metallic lead can
be produced during the lead reduction process (melting process) and around 5 percent
(w/w) of the slag is lead compound (Basel Convention and UNEP report, 2003).
Due to a lack of technologies and expertise, lead exposure from used LABs
recycling factories can be more common in developing countries. For instance,
according to a study (Chen et al., 2012), “dust lead concentration within the factory
area varied from 441,460 to 708,560 mg/kg with a mean value of 601,030 mg/kg.”
The recycling lead-acid battery factory in the study has a 1 million kilovolt-ampere-
hour (kVAh) battery production capacity. Chen et al (2012) states lead concentration
in outdoor dust samples collected from polluted areas (0-500m distance from the
factory) was from 270 mg/kg to 19,490 mg/kg (mean: 9,250 mg/kg). Another study
(Were et al., 2012) shows airborne lead levels in breaking and the furnace
(temperature 1000-1200°C) of a recycling factory were 420±127 µg/m3 and 447±154
µg/m3, respectively. The concentration of lead in the air exceeded Occupational
Safety and Health Administration Permissible Exposure Limit for lead, which is 50
µg/m3 (8-hour workday). Chen et al (2012) show that the lead concentration in the
dust decreased when sampling distance from the factory increased. In addition, the
study suggested the main lead pollutant source for the neighboring environment is
lead particulates in the atmosphere. Lead particulate in the lead powder in the factory
is 90 percent inhalable particles (<10µm), 50 percent fine particles (<2.5µm), and 25
percent ultrafine particles (<1.0µm) (Chen et al., 2012). After analyzing lead dust in
the cloth bag filter of the air treatment process, Chen et al., (2012) found that 32
49
percent of inhalable particle was captured and approximately 60 percent of the lead
particulate was released to the surrounding environment.
However, in Mongolia, air control devices are not used in most family-owned
recycling factories; thus, the lead particulates in the factory air are going to be
released into the atmosphere directly. According to the Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response (OERR) (U.S. EPA, 1992), lead contaminant concentration in
used LABs sites is up to 7 percent of the total lead in a battery. Pb, PbS, PbSO4, and
PbOx are the main pollutants in the recycling factories (OERR report, 1992, and
Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, 2006). Baldasano et al., (1997)
shows that “Pb smelters had mean emission factors of 0.1 grams and 0.05 grams of Pb
emitted per kg of Pb processed for primary and secondary Pb smelters respectively”
(Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, 2006). Therefore, we can assume
every one kg of lead processing in the recycling factory in Mongolia will emit 0.05 g
of Pb to the environment.
The total amount of the lead released is:
1,645,632 kg Pb/yr × 0.05 g Pb emission/kg Pb=82,281.6 g of Pb/yr
For the worst-case scenario, 82.28 kg of lead per year can be emitted to the
atmosphere directly. Even though a part of the lead is in the slag, eventually lead dust
and lead particulates (inhalable particulates <10 µm) will be released to the air
because of not having waste treatment for the slag.
Hazard identification
Physical and chemical properties of lead
Lead is in the Group 14 (IVA) of the periodic table, which has electron
configuration of (Xe) 4f14 5d10 6s2 6p2. In nature, lead compounds are one of four
stable isotopes: “208Pb (51–53%), 206Pb (23.5– -27%), 207Pb (20.5–23%), and 204Pb
(1.35–1.5%)” (ASTDR, 2007). In the environment, lead exists commonly as Pb (II).
Pb (IV) exists rarely under normal environmental conditions. Emissions from
secondary smelters typically are Pb, PbSO4, PbS, and PbOx. Table 19 shows the
physical and chemicals properties of elemental lead, lead sulfate and lead sulfide
(Lead Toxicology Profile, ASTDR, 2007).
50
Table 19. Physical and chemicals properties of lead
Characteristic Lead Lead sulfate Lead sulfide
Chemical structure Pb PbSO4 PbS
EPA hazardous waste D008 No data D008
Molecular weight 207.20 303.26 239.27
Color Bluish-gray White Black, blue or
silver
Physical state Solid Solid Cubic, metallic
crystal
Melting point 327.4C 1170C 1114C
Boiling point 1740C No data 1281C
Density at 20C 11.34g/cm3 6.2 g/cm3 7.57-7.59 g/cm3
Odor None No data No data
Solubility water at
25C
Insoluble 42.5 mg/L 0.86 mg/L at 13
C
Organic solvents Insoluble Insoluble alcohol Soluble in nitric
acid, insoluble in
alcohol
Vapor pressure 1.77 mmHg at
1000C
No data 10 mmHg at
975C
Henry`s law constant No data No data No data
51
The average residence time of lead in the atmosphere is 10 days, which allows lead to
travel long distances through the air. Lead is insoluble in water; however, wet and
dry deposition is the main removal mechanism for lead particles from the atmosphere.
Therefore, the major contaminant source is soils. According to a study (Corrin and
Natusch 1977), “the median particle distribution for lead emissions from smelters is
1.5 µm with 86 percent of the particle sizes under 10 µm” (ASTDR, 2007). Lead
becomes water-soluble only at certain pH values. At pH higher than 5.4, lead
solubility in water is about “30 µg/L in hard water and approximately 500 µg/L in soft
water” (ASTDR, 2007). “Plants and animals may bioconcentrate lead”, however, soil
organic matter absorbs lead; therefore, bioavailability of lead is limited (ASTDR,
2007).
Toxicology: Renal effects in humans According to the Toxicology Profile for Lead (TPL) (ASTDR, 2007), there is
no safe threshold for lead toxicity in humans; therefore, “MRLs were not derived for
lead”. An epidemiology study shows (Haefliger et al., 2009) the blood lead
concentration of 50 children near used LABs recycling factories in Senegal ranged
39.8-613.9 µg/dL (mean: 129.5 µg/dL) and 17 children out of 50 suffered from
neurological damage from lead toxicity. Heafliger et al (2009) found that 42 percent
of the total children had an increased incidence of severe gastrointestinal and 34
percent of the children had a neuropsychiatric disorder. The indoor lead concentration
in soils was 14,000 mg/kg and the outdoor concentration was 302,000 mg/kg. The 18
children (1-6 years old) died due to “encephalopathy resulting from severe lead
intoxication” (Heafliger et al., 2009). LOAELs for neurological disorders in adults
and children are shown Table 20 because the most sensitive organism of lead toxicity
is nerve systems (WHO, 2010).
Table 20. LOAELs for neurological disorders
LOAELs (µg/L) Effects
300 (adults) Peripheral nerve dysfunction
150-200 (females)
200-300 (males)
Erythrocyte protoporphyrin elevation
100-150 (children) Vitamin D3 reduction
52
150-200 (children) Cognitive impairment, Erythrocyte protoporphyrin elevation
A study shows (Cooper, 1988) 4,519 battery plant workers who worked between 1946
and 1970 had greater mortality rates (p<0.01) compared to the national average.
During the period 1947 - 1972, the mean lead blood level was 63 µg/dL for 1,326
battery plant workers (ASTDR, 2007).
“Classic lead nephrotoxicity is characterized by proximal tubular nephropathy,
glomerular sclerosis, and interstitial fibrosis and related functional deficits, including
enzymuria, low- and high-molecular weight proteinuria, impaired transport of organic
anions and glucose, and depressed glomerular filtration rate” (TPL, ASTDR, 2007).
The overall dose-response curve suggests “an increasing severity of nephrotoxicity
associated with increasing” blood lead (PbB) concentration in humans. The studies
states severe lead poisoning in early childhood will cause renal failure or reduce the
kidney function (P. Castellino, Bologna and N. Castellino, chapter 12, 1995).
According to the toxicology profile for lead (ASTDR, 2007), a longitudinal study
shows a significant relationship between increasing serum creatinine concentration
and an increase in blood lead level (PbB <10 µg/dL). Furthermore, a cross-sectional
analysis resulted risks of chronic renal disease (“defined as severely depressed
glomerular filtration rate”) in association with blood lead level (PbB <6 µg/dL). Table
21 shows the renal effects at various PbB concentrations (TPL, ASTDR, 2007).
Table 21. Lead nephrotoxicity in humans (Dose-Response)
Response Dose in PbB
Effects on glomerular filtration
<10 µg/dL
Effects on enzymuria and proteinuria
>30 µg/dL
Severe deficits in function and pathological changes
>50 µg/dL
According to the TPL (ASTDR, 2007), the target-organ toxicity dose for renal in
humans is PbB concentration at 40-100 µg/dL (chronic nephropathy). For the child
this does, PbB level is approximately 34 µg/dL (Verberk et al., 1996).
53
Risk Characterization
Lead risk calculation
1. Lead concentration in the air
The total amount of lead released to the atmosphere (p.23): 82,281.6g Pb/yr (225.43g
Pb/d). To get the lead concentration in the air, the same calculation is from the
mercury assessment is repeated for lead. Therefore, lead concentration per day is:
Lead concentration = 225.43g Pb/d65,155×104×m3
= 0.000346mg Pb/m3
2. Chronic exposure of renal effects in humans
A study (Were et al., 2012) shows that an increase in airborne lead exposure resulted
in increasing PbB in employees who work in the used LABs recycling factory in
Kenya. Table 22 shows the airborne lead concentration inside recycling factory and
PbB concentration in workers (Were et al., 2012).
Table 22. Lead concentration in the air and PbB
Sampling location Airborne lead level (µg/m3)
Mean ± Standard Deviation
Blood lead level (µg/dL)
Mean ± Standard Deviation
Breaking 420±127 Not sampled
Furnace 447±154 61.6±14.7
Casting 430±101 63.9±11.7
Refining 405±137 61.1±9.1
All production 427±124 62.2±12.7
Office 59.2±22.7 43.4±6.6
Since there is no LOAEL, NOAEL for renal effects from the lead exposure by
inhalation, we will assume lead concentration from the air in the office of the used
LABs recycling factory 59.2±22.7 µg/m3 is as a LOAEL for nephrotoxicity in
humans. In the lead risk assessment, it considers renal effects in children who live in
500 m radius from the LABs recycling factories, thus the airborne lead level from the
office (Table 22) could be used for the reference concentration calculation. The blood
lead level 43.4±6.6 µg/dL from workers in the office is much higher than 10 µg/dL
54
(Table 21), which indicates that lead concentration in the air (59.2±22.7 µg/m3) could
affect glomerular filtration in the human kidneys.
3. Reference concentration (RfC)
RfC = LOAELUF
LOAEL: 59.2±22.7 µg/m3 (Table 22), UF: 100
RfC = 59.2 µg/!!
!"" = 0.592 µg/m3
4. Chronic Daily Intake (CDI) by inhalation
CDI = CA×IR×ET×EF×ED
BW×AT
CDI1= 0.000346mg Pb/m3×0.019m3×12hr/d×365d/yr×70yr
33kg×365d/yr×70yr
CDI1= 0.00000239 mg/kg/d
When ET is equal to 24hr/d, chronic daily intake is:
CDI2= 0.00000478 mg/kg/d
5. Hazard Quotient (HQ)
HQ= CDIRfC
HQ1= 0.40×10!! (<1)
HQ2= 0.82×10!! (<1)
The hazard quotients are less than one, which means there are likely to be no renal
effects on children who live near the used LABs factories; however, the factories do
not have waste treatment for the slag. Thus there could be environmental pollution to
groundwater contamination and the soil due to slag disposal.
55
Chapter 5
CONCLUSIONS
Implementing the EPR policy in a developing country has several benefits,
including reducing environmental and human health risks due to poorly designed
landfills and waste incinerators, and decreasing the municipal burden for the physical
and financial investment in waste management. Also the program improves the
producer responsibility for their products` waste, and promotes less virgin natural
resource use for a product and process. Manufacturers are the only important player
that can drive the design improvements to reduce hazardous substances from
products. Therefore, the overall costs from authorities for waste management can be
reduced under the EPR program. In addition, due to implementation of the EPR
program, the collection and recycling rates have been significantly increased and this
could be mimicked in UB city; for example, the recycling rate of packaging and
containers in Japan was increased by 27% from 1997 to 2000 (OECD, 2001).
As a developing country, the Mongolian government has an important role to
play in the development and implementation of HHW management and the EPR
policy nationwide. China has developed several regulations, environmental standards,
and promotion laws that are run by the government and that showed dramatic
improvement in the waste reduction. Under the EPR policy in Thailand, customers are
paid if they bring personal computers and notebooks to the certified retailers or a
collection center (Kojima et al., 2009). There should be the government intervention
in the waste management system if there will be a potential hazard for the residents
and the environment.
In 1999, Bennett at the OECD EPR workshop introduced the following matrix
system (Table 23) to give a brief guide to policy makers about waste management
under the EPR framework (OECD, 2001). The horizontal and vertical axes represent
environmental impacts and the cost of recovery value, respectively.
Table 23. Matrix application for the EPR policy framework
Matrix A
Market driven EPR program
Matrix B
Voluntary EPR program
56
As shown in Matrix A, the high recovery rate for waste that can be voluntary
collected by individual producers can be explained because it is a market-driven
system and the recycled material is highly valuable. This system fits in used LABs
recycling process. The risk assessment for lead exposure from recycling factories was
low compared to the mercury hazard quotient. This may be because most of the lead
contaminant is in the slag or wastewater from the factories. In the used LABs
processing stage, the lead particulate matter in the air is higher than outside; therefore,
the occupational human health risk assessment would have been a bigger issue.
However, because lead is a valuable metal, factories are still continuing recycling
used LABs and putting the employees` health to danger. In this case, the
environmental impacts and human health effects cover a wide range; therefore, to
prevent these risks the mandatory EPR program operated by PROs for used LABs is
essential in Mongolia.
Based on the children’s health risk assessment for elemental mercury exposure
as it relates to potential neurological damages, authority participation in an EPR is
necessary because the calculated results in Chapter 3 showed a high risk to the
Positive value: post-consumer
phase
Positive value
Low High
Low environmental impact
waste
Negative
Value
Low High
Matrix C
Negotiated EPR program
Medium impact waste
Negative
value
Low High
Matrix D
Mandatory EPR program
High environmental
impact waste
Low High
Negative
value
57
children’s neurological system from the current system of open burning of waste.
Unlike used LABs where airborne exposure to lead is minimal even from open
burning and where lead recovery is valuable, FLs do not have highly valuable
materials (mercury content is less than in e-waste), the mandatory EPR program is
needed to regulate FL waste. Therefore, this kind of HHW management fits in the
Matrix D, which shows that government intervention is important. The risk
assessment calculations can be used by the government to demonstrate the health
concerns to the citizens to encourage participation in the EPR program.
58
REFERENCES
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (1999). “Toxicological
profile for Mercury”.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2007). “Toxicological
profile for Lead”.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2013). “Addendum to the Profile
for Mercury”.
Aucott M., McLinden M., Winka M. (2003). Release of Mercury from Broken
Fluorescent Bulbs. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
Basel Convention and UNEP. (2003). “Technical guidelines for the environmentally
sound management of waste lead-acid batteries”.
Benarie M. H. (1975). “Calculation of the mean yearly mixing height over urban
areas, from air pollution data”. The Science of the Total Environmental.
Bose-O`Reilly S., McCarty K. M., Steckling N., Lettmeier B. (2010). “Mercury
Exposure and Children`s Health”. Current problems in pediatric and
adolescent health care. Vol. 40.
Bourson J. L. (1995). “Recycling of lead/acid batteries in a small plant”. Journal of
Power Source. Vol. 57.
Cao S., Duan X., Zhao X., Wang B., Ma J., Fan D.,…Jiang G. (). “Health risk
assessment of various metal(loid)s via multiple exposure pathways on
children living near a typical lead-acid battery plant, China”.
Environmental Pollution. Vol. 200.
Carpi A. (1997). “Mercury from combustion sources: a review of the chemical
species emitted and their transport in the atmosphere”. Water, Air, and Soil
Pollution. Vol. 98.
Castellino P., Bologna, Castellino N. (1995). “Chapter 12. Lead and Kidney”.
59
Inorganic lead exposure: Metabolism and Intoxication.
Cassel S. (1988). “Managing household hazardous waste- a framework for
action”. Environmental impact assessment. Vol. 8.
Chen L., Xu Z., Ling M., Huang Y., Fan R., Su Y.,……Peng X. (2012). “Lead
exposure assessment from study near a lead-acid battery factory in China”.
Science of the Total Environment. Vol. 429.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation. (2007). “Practices and Options for
Environmentally Sound Management of Spent Lead-acid Batteries within
North America”.
Driedger R. J. (2002). “From Cradle to Grave, Extended Producer Responsibility for
Household Hazardous Wastes in British Columbia”. Journal of Industrial
Ecology. Vol. 5.
East Asia and Pacific Region of World Bank. (1999). “What a Waste: Solid Waste
Management in Asia”.
Faridah H Were, Geoffrey N. Kamau, Paul M. Shiundu, Godfrey A. Wafula, Charles
M. Moturi. (2012). “Air and Blood Lead Levels in Lead Acid Battery
Recycling and Manufacturing Plants in Kenya”. Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Hygiene.
Frieberg L. World Health Organization. (1991). “Inorganic Mercury”
George C. Holzworht. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1972). “Mixing
heights, wind speeds, and potential for urban air pollution throughout the
contiguous United States”
Haefliger P., Mathieu-Nolf M., Lociciro S., Ndiaye C., Coly M., Diouf A.,…..
Neira M. (2009).“Mass Lead Intoxication from Informal Used Lead-Acid
Battery Recycling in Dakar, Senegal”. Environmental Health Perspectives,
Vol. 117.
60
Haider M. J., Qureshi N. (2013). “Studies on battery repair and recycling workers
occupationally exposed to lead in Karachi”. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu
Higieny. Vol. 64.
He W., Li. G., Ma X., Wang H., Huang J., Xu M., Huang C. (2006). “WEEE recovery
strategies and the WEEE treatment status in China”. Journal of Hazardous
Materials.
Hicks C., Dietmar R., Eugster M. (2005). “The recycling and disposal of electrical
and electronic waste in China – legislative and market responses”.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol. 25.
Interstate Mercury Education and Reduction Clearinghouse. (2014). “Mercury use in
Batteries”.
Japan International Cooperation Agency. (2012). “The final report for waste
management improvement in Ulaanbaatar city”.
Johnson N. C., Manchester S., Sarin L., Gao Y., Kulaots I., Hurt R. H. (2008)
“Mercury Vapor Release from Broken Compact Fluorescent Lamps and In
Situ Capture by New Nanomaterial Sorbents”. Environmental Science and
Technology. Vol. 42
Kahhat R., Kim J., Xu M., Allenby B., Williams E., Zhang P. (2008). “Exploring e-
waste management systems in the United States”. Resources, Conservation
and Recycling. Vol. 52.
Khetriwal, Kraeuchi P., Widmer R. (2009). “Producer responsibility for e-waste
management: Key issues for consideration – Leaning from the Swiss
experience”. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 90
Kojima M., Yoshida A., Sasaki S. (2009). “Difficulties in applying extended
producer responsibility policies in developing countries: case studies in e-
waste recycling in China and Thailand”. Journal of Material Cycles and
Waste Management. Vol. 11.
61
Kuijp T. J. V. D., Huang L., Cherry C.R. (2013). “Health hazards of China’s lead-acid
battery industry: a review of its market drivers, production processes, and
health impacts”. Environmental Health.
Li Z. G., Feng X., Li P., Liang L., Tang S. L., Wang S. F.,…. Shang L. H. (2010).
“Emissions of air-borne mercury from five municipal solid waste landfills in
Guiyang and Wuhan, China”. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Vol. 10.
Lim SR., Kang D., Ogunseitan OA., Schoenung JM. (2013). “Potential
environmental impacts from the metals in incandescent, compact fluorescent
lamp (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs”. Environmental Science
and Technology. Vol. 47.
Malkin R., Braundt-Rauf P., Graziano J., Parides M. (1992). “Blood lead levels in
incinerator workers”. Environmental research. Vol. 59.
Mayers C. K. (2007). “Strategic, Financial, and Design Implications of Extended
Producer Responsibility in Europe”. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Vol. 11.
McKerlie K., Knight N., Thorpe B. (2006). “Advancing Extended Producer
Responsibility in Canada”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 14.
Milanez B., Buhrs T. (2009). “Extended producer responsibility in Brazil: the case of
tyre waste”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 17.
The Ministry of Education and Science of Mongolia. (2013). Minister enactment,
A/311. “The elementary school curriculum in Mongolia”.
The Ministry of Health of Mongolia. (2006). “Medical waste”. Retrieved from:
Legalinfo.mn.
Ministers of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Environment, Enactment
249/201. (2002). “A new guideline for the medical waste segregation,
collection, storage, transportation and final disposal”. Retrieved from:
Legalinfo.mn.
62
The Mongolian Government. (2012). “National Plan for Waste Management
Improvement”. Retrieved from: Legalinfo.mn.
The Mongolian Government. (2012). “Waste Law”. Retrieved from: Legalinfo.mn.
Nance P., Patterson J., Willis A., Foronda N., Dourson M. (2012). “Human health
risks from mercury exposure from broken compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs)
”. Toxicology and Pharmacology. Vol. 62
Nicol S., Thompson S. (2007). “Policy options to reduce consumer waste to
zero: comparing product stewardship and extended producer responsibility for
refrigerator waste”. Waste Management and Research. Vol. 25.
Nielsen J. B., Andersen H. R., Andersen O., Starklint H. (1991). “Mercuric Chloride-
Induced Kidney Damage in Mice- Time Course and Effect of Dose”. Journal
of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Vol. 34.
Nnorom I. C., Osibanjo O. (2008). “Overview of electronic waste (e-waste)
management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the
developing countires”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Vol. 52.D. S.
Ogushi Y., Kandlikar M. (2007). “Assessing Extended Producer Responsibility laws
in Japan”. Environmental Science and Technology.
OECD. (2001). “EPR Programme Implementation: Institutional and Structural
Factors“. OECD Seminar on Extended Producer Responsibility EPR:
Programme Implementation and Assessment.
OECD. (2001). “Extended Producer Responsibility, a guidance manual for
governments”.
OECD. (2014). “The State of Play on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Opportunities and Challenges”. Global Forum on Environment: Promoting
Sustainable Materials Management through Extended Producer
Responsibility (EPR).
63
Pacyna E. G., Pacyna J. M. (2002). “Global Emission of Mercury from
Anthropogenic Sources in 1995”. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. Vol.137.
Queneau P.B., Leiby R., Robinson R. (2013). “Recycling Lead and Zinc in the United
States”. World of Metallurgy – ERZMETALL. Vol. 68.
Raposo C., Roeser H. M. (2001). “Contamination of the environment by the current
disposal methods of mercury-containing lamps in the state of Minas Gerais,
Brazil”. Waste Management. Vol. 21.
Spicer A. J., Johnson M. R. (2004). “Third-party remanufacturing as a solution for
extended producer responsibility”. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 12.
Stiannopkao S., Wong M. H. (2013). “Handling e-waste in developed and developing
countries: Initiatives practices, and consequences”. Science of the Total
Environment. Vol. 463.
U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. (1991). EPA/540/2-91/014.
“Selection of Control Technologies for Remediation of Lead Battery
Recycling Sites”.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). EPA-452/R-97-005. “Mercury Study
Report to Congress, Volume III: Fate and Transport of Mercury in the
Environment”
U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development. (2006). EPA/600/R-5/114aF. “Air
Quality Criteria for Lead, Volume I of II”
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). EPA530-R-09-001. “Fluorescent
lamp recycling”.
Velzen D. V., Langenkamp H., Herb G. (2002). “Review: Mercury in waste
incineration”. Waste Management and Research. Vol. 20.
Walls M. (2003). “The Role of Economics in Extended Producer Responsibility:
Making Policy Choices and Setting Policy Goals”.
64
Wang J. J., Zhao H. W., Zhong X. P., Kong S. F., Liu Y. S., Zeng H. (2011).
“Investigation of mercury levels in soil around a municipal solid waste
incinerator in Shenzhen, China”. Environmental Earth Science. Vol. 64.
WeatherSpark. (2015). “Average Weather for Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia”.
Were F. H., Kamau G. N., Shiundu P. M., Wafula G. A., Moturi C. M. (2012). “Air
and Blood Lead Level in Lead Acid Battery Recycling and Manufacturing
Plants in Kenya”. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene.
White D. M., Kelly W. E., Stucky M. J., Switt J. L., Palazzolo M. A. U. S.
Environmental Protection Agecy. (1994). EPA/600/SR-93/181. “Emission
Test Report Field Test of Carbon Injection for Mercury Control, Camden
County Municipal Waste Combustor”.
Widmer R., Oswald-Krapf H., Sinha-Khetriwal D., Schnellmann M., Boni H. (2005).
“Global perspective on e-waste”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.
Vol. 25
The World Bank. (2012). “What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste
Management”
World Health Organization. (2010). “Childhood Lead Poisoning”.
Ye J., Kayaga S., Smount I. (2008). “Regulating for e-waste in China: progress and
challenges”. Municipal Engineer. Vol. 162.
Zalups R. K. (2013). “Molecular Interactions with Mercury in the Kidney”.
Pharmacological Reviews. Vol. 52.
Zhang Q. (2013). “The Current Status on the Recycling of Lead-acid Batteries in
China”. International Journal of Electrochemical Science. Vol. 8.
Zhou J., Wu S., Pan Y., Su Y., Yang L., Zhao J.,….. G. Qian. (2015). “Mercury in
municipal solids waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash in China: Chemical
speciation and risk assessment”. Fuel. Vol. 158.