Exploring the Realities of Professional Practice: Implications for Engineering Education
description
Transcript of Exploring the Realities of Professional Practice: Implications for Engineering Education
November, 2005
1 of 30
Exploring the Realities of Professional Practice:
Implications for Engineering Education
Dr Llewellyn MannBE (Mech & Space) Hons, BSc (Physics), GCEd
(Higher Ed), PhD (Engineering Education)
The University of QueenslandPurdue University
Central Queensland University
2 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
Overview of seminar
• The Challenge• The Way• The Story so Far• The Plan• The Future
3 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Challenge
What are professional abilities and skills that are:
• Essential for the current global workforce and the ‘flat world’
• Not widely developed by students at the moment• Will enable engineering graduates to meet the
challenges of the 21st century
4 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Challenge
Six right brain "senses," to complement our left brain, analytic skills. We need to realize the value of:
• not just function, but also design. • not just argument, but also story. • not just focus, but also symphony. • not just logic, but also empathy. • not just seriousness, but also play. • not just accumulation, but also meaning.
Further a final conceptual age skill to Pink's list:
• not just knowledge, but also learning.
(Pink 2005)
5 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Challenge – We need…
• creative researchers, developers, and entrepreneurs who can help their companies stay ahead of the technology development curve;
• designers capable of creating products that are attractive as well as functional;
• holistic, multidisciplinary thinkers who can recognize complex patterns and opportunities in the global economy and formulate strategies to capitalize on them;
• people with strong interpersonal skills that equip them to establish and maintain good relationships with current and potential customers and commercial partners;
• people with the language skills and cultural awareness needed to build bridges between companies and workers in developing nations (where many manufacturing facilities and jobs are migrating) and developed nations (where many customers and consumers will continue to be located);
• self-directed learners, who can keep acquiring the new knowledge and skills they need to stay abreast of rapidly changing technological and economic conditions.
(Felder 2006)
6 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Challenge – What Abilities and Skills?
7 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The WayWe need to find out how to deal with these challenges from the people who are dealing
with them daily at the moment!
Practice, not theoryExperiences of those in practiceFrom their point of view
Looking at variation between practitioners’
experiences
8 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Way – Focus on variation
• Different people experience aspects of practice in different ways– Different contexts, cultures, backgrounds, previous
experiences
• The more variation discerned and experienced, the more comprehensive our understanding can become BUT is never going to be complete
Need to look at variation among practitioners’ experiences to build bigger picture of those
aspects
9 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Way - Research method
Phenomenography• Investigating qualitative variations in people’s
experiences of an aspect of the world (Marton 1986)
• Interpretive research tradition since mid-70s• Revealed ‘surface’ and ‘deep’ approaches to
learning• Used in fields of study such as chemistry, health
science, education, management, physics and engineering
• Involves interviewing people about their experiences with the aspect of the world of interest
• Participants chosen to obtain the largest diversity of experiences
10 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Way - Object of study
Researcher
SubjectsAspect of the
World
Relation between researcher &
subjects
Relation between researcher & an
aspect of the worldObject of
Study
Relation between subjects & an aspect of the world
(Bowden 2005)
11 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Way - Phenomenography points of departure
e.g. thematic analysis
(Trigwell 2000)
12 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Way – What Other Ways?
13 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Story so Far
Cross-Disciplinary
Practice
Sustainable Design
14 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Story so Far – Sustainable Design• Interviewed 22 practising design professionals
– All had experiences of sustainable design– 14 engineers and 8 non-engineers– Worked in engineering operations – Australian
context– Were recognised by others as people of interest– Chosen to obtain largest diversity of experiences
possible – not statistically representative– 7 female and 15 male– Years of experience with design
• 6 with < 5; 8 with 5 -> 15; 8 with +16
– Range of industry sectors• 5 Construction; 10 Community Building; 5 Resources; 5
Product; 6 Individual; 7 Education
• Interviews lasted between 40 and 80 minutes• Digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim• Analysed using Phenomenography
15 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
Five different ways of experiencing sustainable design
1. Sustainable design is solution finding2. Sustainable design is reductionist
problem solving3. Sustainable design is holistic problem
solving4. Sustainable design is social network
problem solving5. Sustainable design is a way of life
16 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
1. Sustainable design is solution finding
Declared Requirements
Physical ProductClient
Solution Finding
Environment
Economy
Decrease -ve impact
Society
Technical & Human
Processes
Sustainable design is finding a solution, either a product or process(es), to satisfy a client’s declared
requirements while decreasing the associated environmental, social and economic impacts.
17 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
2. Sustainable design is reductionist problem solving
Problem I dentification
Problem SolvingReductionist
Environment
Economy
Decrease -ve impact
Society
Problem
Client Physical Product
Technical & Human
Processes
Sustainable design is the process of identifying and solving a client’s problem by making separate decisions that each decrease the associated environmental, social and economic impact.
18 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
3. Sustainable design is holistic problem solving
Sustainable design is the process of identifying and solving a client’s problem holistically on a systems level,
to increase the environmental, social and economic value of the solution.
Problem SolvingHolistic
Problem I dentification
Environment
Economy
I ncrease +ve value
Society
Problem
Client Physical Product
Technical & Human
Processes
19 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
4. Sustainable design is social network problem solving
Client
Society
Problem I dentification
Environment
Economy
I ncrease +ve value
Problem SolvingHolistic
Physical Product
Technical & Human
ProcessesProblem
Sustainable design is the process of identifying and solving a client’s problem, embedded within a wider societal context to increase the environmental, social and economic value of the
solution to both the client and society.
20 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
5. Sustainable design is a way of life
Client
Society
Problem I dentification
Environment
Economy
I ncrease +ve value
Problem SolvingHolistic
Physical Product
Technical & Human
ProcessesProblem
Per
son
al F
ram
ewor
k
Sustainable design is a way of approaching life where all the activities engaged in aim to increase the environmental, social and economic value of the
outcome to both the individual and society.
21 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
Relationships between categories of description
Solution Finding
Reductionist Problem Solving
Holistic Problem Solving
Social Network Problem Solving
A Way of Life
Solution Focused
Problem Focused
Social Network Focused
Problem Approach
Holistic Approach
Social Approach
Professional -Personal Approach
Variations Between Categories of Description
Focu
s W
ithin
Cat
egor
ies
of D
escr
iptio
n
22 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Story so Far – Cross-disciplinary Practice (Current)• Interviewed 22 cross-disciplinary practitioners
– All had experiences of cross-disciplinarity– 15 engineers and 7 non-engineers– Worked in various sectors – US context– Many recognised by others as people of interest– Chosen to obtain largest diversity of experiences
possible – not statistically representative– 10 female and 12 male– Years of experience with cross-disciplinarity
• 4 with < 5; 5 with 5 -> 15; 13 with +16
– Diverse epistemological distances and project sizes
• Interviews lasted between 25 and 50 minutes• Digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim• Analysing using both phenomenography and
thematic analysis
23 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Story so Far – Cross-disciplinary Practice
Scale of Projects
Epis
tem
olo
gic
al
Dis
tan
ce
1 5 10 50 100
1
2
3
4
5
U
S
E
JI
MT
H
A D
O
W
P
Y
G
XK
B
N
R
L
F
<5 6->15 >15Years of Experience:
24 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Story so Far – Emerging Themes• Communication
– Difficulty communicating between disciplines makes collaborating hard, but
– Can’t over simplify when talking about complex problems
• Personal investment to work cross-disciplinary
• Focus on problems that require a cross-disciplinary approach– Can’t approach from a purely disciplinary
direction
• Develops into part of their identity– Not only do they like it but it’s
who they are
25 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Plan
Exploring other professional skills
Translating findings into engineering
education
26 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Plan – Translating findings into practice
Recent natural disasters (e.g., tsunamis, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, and floods) were a hot topic at the 2006 International Conference on Predicting and Responding to Natural Disasters last month. The conference brought in people with diverse backgrounds from around the world, particularly those who live or work in “disaster-plagued” areas.
At the end of the conference, you were asked to bring together a team that would focus on developing new ideas for a “disaster response system” for tornadoes in Tippecanoe County.
1. What issues do you think are important to consider?
2. Who would you want on your team? For each team member identify the expertise they would bring and how (or when) they would contribute to the project.
Cross-disciplinary Disaster Response Scenario
27 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
0
5
10
15
20
25F
inan
cial
Phy
sica
l
Peo
ple
Cle
an-u
p
Reb
uild
Impr
ove
Insp
ect
Em
erge
ncy
serv
ices
(non
-med
ical
)
Med
ical
Cou
nsel
ing
Eas
e
War
ning
His
toric
al w
isdo
m
Tea
m c
hoos
ing
Pla
nnin
g
Eva
luat
ing
Mor
e
Prevent
Prevent/Treament
Treatment
Up and running
Restore
Restore/Prevent
All time
Count of Temporal-based category
Functional category
Temporal-based category
Functional category versus Temporal based category
The Plan – Translating findings into practice
28 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Plan – Translating findings into practice – How else?
29 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
The Future
•Continued collaboration on cross-disciplinary practice & develop close links with practitioners both in Australia and internationally– Workshops – face to face– Virtual research group – play across data set
•Expand focus to include other skills such as cross-cultural awareness, negotiation & storytelling etc
•Key – integrate ‘practice’ perspective into engineering education
30 of 30
Nov
em
ber,
200
5
November, 2005
Questions