Explaining the Relation between Organizational Commitment ... · The present study was performed to...
Transcript of Explaining the Relation between Organizational Commitment ... · The present study was performed to...
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 121
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
Explaining the Relation between Organizational Commitment and
Dimensions of Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Case study: Textile Factories in Borujerd County
DR. JAVAD MEHRABI *
MEHRDAD ALEMZADEH**
MEHRDAD JADIDI***
NEMATOLLAH MAHDEVAR****
*Dept. of Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran **
Master of public management, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd branch, Borujerd,Iran
***Master of public management, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd branch, Borujerd,Iran
***Master of Business management, Payam Noor University of Tehran,Tehran,Iran
Abstract
The present study was performed to explain the relation between organizational commitment
and dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior that was conducted using descriptive-
field method. The statistical population consisted of employees with education level of
diploma and higher who were two-hundred seventy persons. The sample size was determined
equal to one-hundred fifty nine according to Morgan Table. Simple random sampling method
was used to determine sample members. Standard organizational commitment questionnaire
with eighteen questions (Allen & Meyer) and standard organizational citizenship behavior
questionnaire with twelve questions (Netemeyer) were tools of data collection. Validity of the
questionnaires was confirmed through content validity by the experts and professors and the
reliability was measured through pre-test and calculation of Cronbach's alpha. Data analysis
was performed using Pierson correlation coefficient and SPSS software. The findings revealed
that there is no relation between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship
behavior in the Textile Factories but organizational commitment has a positive (direct)
relation with dimensions of altruism and conscientiousness.
Key words: organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, altruism,
conscientiousness
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 122
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
Introduction and statement of the problem
The current environment is complex and unpredictable (Frankema et al., 2006, p.291) and
organizations are permanently faced with social developments such as globalization,
technology advancements and increasing of the global competition (Govaerts et al., 2011, p.
35). Under such conditions the organization needs a high level of employees' commitment in
order to be able to maintain its competitive advantage in the product and the labor market (Joo
& Park, 2010, p 483). Organizational commitment refers to individual feelings of employees
with regard to the organization (Joo & Park, 2010, p 485). It is a perceived psychological state
that binds people towards an activity related to the purposes and propensity for using only one
method (Lee et al., 2010, p 131). Indeed organizational commitment focuses on satisfaction of
employees' needs through mutual action with the organization (Fisser & Browaeys, 2010, p.
282). For instance, when an employee finds that the manager or the organization have not
satisfied his/her expectations about the work and job opportunities, his/her commitment and
job satisfaction are fallen severely and thus organizational performance will be decreased
(Kagaari & Munene, 2007, p.707).
On the other hand, individual behavior at the workplace has attracted the attention of many
researchers during the past decade. Various kinds of behavior have been identified while
analyzing this term that include professional social behavior, extra-role behavior and
organizational citizenship behavior. The common purpose of these studies is to explain the
type of individual behavior that is supposed it is effective on long-term success of the
organization and had been ignored in the past when the employee's performance was
evaluated (Barroso Castro et al., 2004, p. 28).
Given to the above-mentioned issues, the relation between organizational commitment and
dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior in the Textile factories in Borujerd County
has been explained in the present study.
Theoretical principles
A) Organizational commitment
Organizational commitment has been the topic of organizational studies for more than thirty
years (Fisher et al., 2010, p. 282) that tests the relations, behaviors and performance of
employees at the workplace (Sezgin, 2009, p. 635). According to Allen and Meyer (2000)
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 123
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
organizational commitment can be defined as a psychological status which defines the
relationship between an employee and the organization and decreases the probability of
leaving the organization by him/her (Rego et al., 2008, p. 59).
Success of organizations depends increasingly on driving two terms of organizational
commitment and job satisfaction (Westover & et al., 2010, p. 375). From one view, rewards
are the determinant of organizational commitment at the workplace (Ashman, 2007, p. 7).
Organizational commitment has been widely studied in terms of the elements, antecedents,
correlations and consequences (Elele & Fields, 2010, p. 372). Allen and Meyer (1991) found
that organizational commitment includes affective commitment, continuous commitment and
normative commitment (Falkenburg & Schyns, 2010, p. 709).
Affective commitment shows the degree a person is united with the organization. Continuous
commitment describes needs of the individual to continue working for the organization based
on perceived expenses related to turnover. Normative commitment describes the degree that
an employee believes he/she must be committed to the organization and might be affected by
social norms. These three dimensions suggest that the individuals remain in their organization,
because they need affective commitment. Allen and Meyer (1991) perceived that elements of
commitment can be analyzed simultaneously and with various degrees (Elele & Fields, 2010,
p. 372).
Elements of organizational commitment are determined with different methods and probably
have different requirements for job behaviors. Affective commitment might first be affected
by positive work experiences and the received organizational support. This may be the
relative strength standard of the individual's participation in the organization. It is determined
through firm belief and accepting the purposes and values of the organization, tendency to
struggle on behalf of the organization and strong intention for maintaining the membership in
the organization. Normative commitment might be based on social commitment and pressure
against the organization. Sense of being committed towards the organization might be affected
by cultural and family sociability of the person that is occurred prior to entering into the
organization. Continuous commitment might be influenced mainly by external considerations
and perceptions such as benefits of retirement and pension plans (Mehrabi et al., A 2013, p.
132).
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 124
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
B) Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)
Organizational citizenship behavior has become an important subject in psychology and
management in recent decades and has attracted much attention to itself (Foote & Tang, 2008,
p.934). Organ (1998) expounded organizational citizenship behavior as a kind of employees'
behavior that is not recognized directly through the formal reward system of the organization
and its purpose is to enhance performance of the organization effectively regardless of
individual productivity purposes of any employee (Kagaari & Munene, 2007, p.708).
Netmeyer et al. (1997) divided organizational citizenship behavior into four classes:
- Sportsmanship: This can be defined as employees' goodwill at the workplace
whenever the conditions are not highly desirable, not complaining to the manager
about the work status and observing positive aspects of work among the problems
(Barroso Castro et al., 2004, p. 30).
- Civil virtue: It can be explained as a behavior that shows attention to participation in
collective life. For example, performing the tasks that the employee does not obliged
to perform but it is in the interests of the organization (Barroso Castro et al., 2004, p.
30).
- Conscientiousness: It is a behavior that is beyond the determined exigencies at the
workplace by the organization, for instance, overtime work in the interests of the
organization (Barroso Castro et al., 2004, p. 30).
- Altruism: It is helping the colleagues to perform their tasks. Altruism and
conscientiousness have been considered in one group entitled helping behaviors by
some researchers (Barroso Castro et al., 2004, p. 30).
These behaviors have been classified based on Organ's definition (1988) from OCB.
According to this definition, employees who show such behaviors are regarded as good
soldiers for the organization (Barroso Castro et al., 2004, p. 30).
C) The relation between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship
behavior
The relation between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior is
largely depends on the fact that whether commitment must be regarded as a class of
behavioral intentions, motivation or motive power or not. Unfortunately, as Schul (1981) has
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 125
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
suggested organizational commitment has been treated differently as four types of variables.
In the work by Steers, Moudi and Porter (1982) whose organizational commitment standard
has been widely used seems that organizational commitment offers both the attitude and a
class of intentions, since they explain organizational commitment in the way that it means
accepting the organizational purposes and values in order to remain in the organization and
trying considerably in the interests of the organization. Both Schul (1981) and O'Reilly and
Chatman (1986) have presented persuasive discussions to consider organizational
commitment as a mental status instead of an explicit behavior; although how they determine
this status is different to some extent. Organizational commitment for Schul is a moral task
that maintains the direction and intensity of the organizational member's behavior when the
measured incentives are not sufficient to perform it. O'Reilly and Chatman prefer to consider
organizational commitment just as the power of accession to the organization; however the
basis of such accession can have different shapes quantitatively. Their information suggests
that only accession based on identification with the organization or internalization of its
values will maintain all kinds of determined participations in the form of organizational
citizenship behavior (Organ, 1990, p. 49-50).
Organ (1990) states that affective commitment that is perceived as a sense of mental social
accession paves the way for organizational citizenship behavior. Organ and Riyan (1995)
performed a meta-analysis research and perceived that affective commitment is related both to
altruism and dimensions of OCB considerably. Other literature provides theoretical and
experimental justification for the expectation that commitment is related to organizational
citizenship behavior (Liu, 2009, p 311).
Conceptual framework
Conceptual framework is a model based on theoretical relations among several factors about
the issues under study that are considered important (Mehrabi et al., B 2013, p. 120). The
following conceptual framework is proposed to explain the relation between organizational
commitment and dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior. It contains Affective
commitment (AC), normative commitment (NC), continuous commitment (CC),
organizational commitment (OC), sportsmanship (SP), civil virtue (CV), conscientiousness
(CO) and altruism (AL).
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 126
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
Diagram 1- Conceptual framework
Hypotheses
- There is a significant relation between organizational commitment and organizational
citizenship behavior.
- There is a significant relation between organizational commitment and each dimension
of organizational citizenship behavior.
Statistical population, sample and sampling method
The statistical population consisted of male and female employees with education level of
diploma and higher from any age group who were two-hundred seventy persons. The sample
size was determined equal to one-hundred fifty nine according to Morgan Table. Simple
random sampling was used in the study.
Methodology and methods of data collection
The study was conducted using descriptive-field method. Historical study was used to
complete research literature and theoretical principles and field study was used to collect other
required information. The field data were collected using closed questionnaire. The applied
OCB dimension
OC dimension
SP
CV
CO
AL
OC
AC
NC
CC
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 127
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
questionnaires were in the form of attitude survey and based on Likert scale (six-option). To
this end, the standard organizational commitment questionnaire with 18 questions (Allen &
Meyer) and the standard organizational citizenship behavior questionnaire with 12 questions
(Netemeyer) were utilized.
Validity and reliability of the questionnaires
Content validity of the questionnaires was based on theoretical principles and was confirmed
by the experts too. The reliability was measured through Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Cronbach's alpha coefficients for organizational commitment questionnaire and organizational
citizenship behavior questionnaire were obtained equal to 0.77 and 0.80 respectively.
Methods of data analysis
Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics methods were used for data analysis.
Descriptive statistics were used to estimate frequency distribution, percentage, mean, tables,
etc and Pierson correlation coefficient was used to test the hypotheses.
Mean and standard deviation of variables
The Likert scale (six-option) was used in this study to give scores to the alternatives
(extremely high (6), high (5), relatively high (4), relatively low (3), low (2) and extremely low
(1)). Mean of the spectrum was equal to 3.5. Thus, mean and standard deviation of variables
are as Table 1.
Table 1- Mean and standard deviation of variables
Variable Mean Standard
deviation
Variable Mean Standard
deviation
SP 3.77 1.29 AC 3.51 1.11
CV 3.67 1.57 NC 2.62 0.97
CO 3.55 1.32 CC 2.80 0.84
AL 3.65 1.54
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 128
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
Data analysis
A) Studying the results obtained through Pierson correlation coefficient
Wherever the significance level is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis (H0: p=0) is rejected at
confidence level 0.95. Rejecting the null hypothesis means that there is a significant relation
between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. If there are no
sufficient evidences to reject this hypothesis, it means there is no significant relation.
Primary hypothesis: There is a significant relation between organizational commitment and
organizational citizenship behavior.
Table 2- Correlation between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship
behavior
OCB
Pierson correlation -0.92 OC
Significance level 0.279
As results of Table 2 show, the correlation coefficient between two variables of organizational
commitment and organizational citizenship behavior is equal to -0.592 and given to the
numerical value, the significance level is equal to sig=0.279 in this test. Because α< sig there
is no relation between the two variables, thus H0 is accepted. Therefore, there is no relation
between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in the Textile
factories in Borujerd County.
The secondary hypothesis: There is a significant relation between organizational commitment
and each dimension of organizational citizenship behavior.
Table 3- Correlation between organizational commitment and each dimension of
organizational citizenship behavior
AL CO CV SP
Pierson
correlation
0.244 0.074 -0.254 -0.90
Significance level 0.37 0.49 0.194 0.350
H0 It is rejected It is not rejected It is not rejected It is not rejected
Significant
relation
There is not a
significant
relation
There is not a
significant
relation
There is not a
significant
relation
There is not a
significant
relation
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 129
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
As results of Table 3 show, the correlation coefficient between organizational commitment
and dimensions of altruism and conscientiousness has become significant. Since the
correlation coefficient between the variables in this hypothesis is positive this relation is
positive (direct).
Table 4- Matrix of Pierson correlation coefficient related to research variables
1 AC
sig
1 191/0 NC
024/0 sig
1 223/0- 92/0- CC
008/0 282/0 sig
1 024/0 310/0 92/0- SP 780/0 000/0 279/0 sig
1 367/0 268/0 118/0 115/0- CV
000/0 001/0 163/0 174/0 sig
1 142/0 477/0 209/0 065/0 041/0 CO
093/0 000/0 013/0 447/0 629/0 sig
1 359 149/0 167/0 076/0 20/0- 160/0 AL
000/0 078/0 048/0 374/0 812/0 059/0 sig
AL CO CV SP CC NC EC
Conclusion and recommendations
The purpose of this study was to explain the relation between organizational commitment and
dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior in the Textile Factories in Borujerd County.
As it is clear from the results of variables' mean, organizational commitment is at a desirable
status in all three components (affective continuous and normative commitment). Indeed,
employees of textile factories have a high dependency or attachment to the organization due to
their high affective commitment. Moreover, because affective commitment is related
positively to organizational justice, job performance and job satisfaction and also it has a
strong positive relation with professional commitment and perceived organizational support it
increases trust and decreases employees' turnover in Borujerd County.
Normative commitment is the second element that creates organizational commitment. It has
been defined as a kind of commitment and obligation that directs employees to remain in the
organization. Researchers have found out that normative commitment is not directed by
payment level, education level or age; rather it is a mutual trust that creates commitment and
obligation for remaining in the organization. Allen and Meyer referred that organizations
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 130
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
which embark upon creating a culture that is expected from employees to be loyal to the
organization will have employees with high normative commitment more probably. Hence,
employees of the textile factories in Borujerd County do not have a high trust in the
organization and high participation because they do not have a high normative commitment.
Continuous commitment includes a commitment that is based on valuing the organization and
employees are being participated in the life of the organization. In this aspect of commitment
employees remain in the organization, because they need to remain and have a high loyalty to
the organization. Therefore, employees of the textile factories in Borujerd County do not have
high loyalty because they do not have a high level of continuous commitment.
Organizational citizenship behavior is at a desirable status in all its four components
(sportsmanship, civil virtue, altruism and conscientiousness) in the textile factories in
Borujerd County. In other words, employees work with goodwill at the workplace whenever
the conditions are lower than the desirable limit and without any complaint. Employees also
perform the tasks that are not bound to do but performing them is in the interests of the
organization. Conscientiousness is a behavior that is beyond the determined exigencies at the
workplace by the organization for instance overtime work in the interests of the organization.
Also employees help their colleagues do their tasks.
Given to the results of Pierson correlation coefficient that showed organizational commitment
has a positive (direct) relation with altruism and conscientiousness the following are
recommended to enhance these two components through organizational commitment:
- Authorities of the textile factories in Borujerd County should inspire the belief to their
employees that problems of the organization are their problems.
- Authorities of the textile factories in Borujerd County should inspire the belief to their
employees that the organization is one part of their family.
- Authorities of the textile factories in Borujerd County should make employees
dependent on the organization emotionally.
- Authorities of the textile factories in Borujerd County should try more to create
intimate relations among the supervisors and employees.
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 131
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
References
1. Ashman, I. (2007), An investigation of the Britishorganizational commitment scale : A
qualitative approach to evaluating construct validity, Management Research News,
Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 5-24.
2. Barroso Castro, C. Martı´n Armario, E. and Martı´n Ruiz, D. (2004), The influence of
employee organizational citizenship behavior on customer loyalty, International
Journal of Service Industry Management Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 27-53.
3. Elele, J. and Fields, D. (2010), Participative decision making and organizational
commitment Comparing Nigerian and American employees, Cross Cultural
Management: An International Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 368-392.
4. Falkenburg, K. and Schyns, B. (2007), Work satisfaction, organizational commitment
and withdrawal behaviours, Management Research News, Vol. 30 No. 10, pp. 708-
723
5. Fisher, R. Boyle, M. V. and Fulop, L. (2010), How gendered is organizational
commitment? The case of academic faculty, International Journal of Organizational
Analysis, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 280-294.
6. Fisser, s. and Browaeys, M. J. (2010), Team learning on the edge of chaos, The
Learning Organization, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 58-68.
7. Frankema, K,B., Rosendaal, B., & Taminiau, Y., (2006). Acting on frictions: learning
blocks and flows in knowledge intensive organizations, Journal of European Industrial
Training, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 291-309.
8. Foote, D. A. and Tang, T. l. P. (2008), Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship
behavior (OCB) Does team commitment make a difference in self-directed teams?,
Management Decision, Vol. 46 No. 6, 2008, pp. 933-947.
9. Govaerts, N. Kyndt, E. Dochy, F. and Baert, H. (2011), Influence of learning and
working climate on the retention of talented employees, Journal of Workplace
Learning, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 35-55.
10. Joo, B. K. and Park, S. (2010), Career satisfaction, organizational commitment, and
turnover intention : The effects of goal orientation, organizational learning culture
and developmental feedback, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol.
31 No. 6, pp. 482-500.
ijcrb.webs.com
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS
COPY RIGHT © 2013 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research 132
DECEMBER 2013
VOL 5, NO 8
11. Kagaari, J. R. K. and Munene, J. C., (2007), Engineering lecturers’ competencies and
organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) at Kyambogo University, Journal of
European Industrial Training, Vol. 31 No. 9, pp. 706-726.
12. Lee, O. F. Tan, G. A. and Javalgi, R. (2010), Goal orientation and organizational
commitment : Individual difference predictors of job performance, International
Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 129-150.
13. Liu, Y. (2009), Perceived organizational support and expatriate organizational
citizenship behavior : The mediating role of affective commitment towards the parent
company, Personnel Review, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 307-319.
14. Mehrabi, J., Jadidi, M., Allameh Haery, F., and Alemzadeh, M., (A 2013), The
Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Organizational Learning
(Boroojerd Telecommunication Company as Case Study), International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 130-139.
15. Mehrabi, J., Soltani, I, Alemzadeh, M., and Jadidi, M.,., (B 2013), Explaining the
Relationship between Organizational Structure and Dimensions of Learning
Organizations (Case study: Education Organization in Boroojerd County and the
Related Departments), International Journal of Academic Research in Business and
Social Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.116-128.
16. Organ, D. W. (1990), The Motivational Basis of organizational citizenship behavior,
Research in organizational behavior, Vol 12, pp. 43-72.
17. Rego, R. Pina e Cunha, M. (2008), Workplace spirituality and organizational
commitment: an empirical study, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol.
21 No. 1, pp. 53-75.
18. Sezgin, F. (2009), Relationships between teacher organizational commitment,
psychological hardiness and some demographic variables in Turkish primary schools,
Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 630-651.
19. Westover, J. H. Westover, A. R. and Westover, L. A. (2010), Enhancing long-term
worker productivity and performance : The connection of key work domains to job
satisfaction and organizational commitment, International Journal of Productivity and
Performance Management Vol. 59 No. 4, pp. 372-387.