Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

11
Steve Uhler’s 2019 Alternate Rate Recommendations Profound knowledge will guide you to reach your goals, if you let it.

Transcript of Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Page 1: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Steve Uhler’s

2019 Alternate Rate

Recommendations

Profound knowledge will guide you to reach your goals, if you let it.

Page 2: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Alternate Rate recommendations

SMUD’s creation is from state laws establishing local agencies in the California Public

Utilities Code.

The board shall consider any recommendations submitted in writing by any member of

the public on alternatives to the rate changes proposed by the general manager.

California Public Utilities Code allows me, with 10 days written notice, to make this

presentation at a rate hearing.

The recommendations will offer solutions that may have been overlooked or avoided by

staff.

Page 3: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

SMUD is committed to be fairer and more

equitable

In making rates and fixed cost recovery fairer and more equitable for all customers

owners.

SMUD has launched a public stakeholder process to examine rates for customer owners

and develop additional analysis addressing the costs, benefits and subsidies related to

systems.

SMUD will use feedback from analysis and customer owners/stakeholders feedback to

further explore rates related to customer owners and appropriate assignment of costs and

benefits.

SMUD’s rates are among the lowest in California, but only for some customer owners, the

challenge is to remove all cross subsidies.

Accurate costing will improve cost recovery and customer owner loyalty.

Customer Experience Excellence is a SMUD Goal.

Page 4: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Making rates and cost recovery fairer and

more equitable for all customer owners

Some customer owners are paying without benefit.

Rate structures that recover costs for legacy commodities or services that customer

owners don’t benefit from are unfair.

Costs related to deferred maintenance are unfair.

Costs related to green pricing products and marketing have been “baked in to the rates”

as one SMUD executive noted.

SMUD markets green pricing products that appear to be a good deal because costs are

“baked into the rates” and paid by others who don’t receive the value.

It does not have to be this way, costing of products can be fairer for and more equitable

for all customer owners.

Page 5: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Public stakeholder process for feedback

Feedback points to unfair fixed charges.

Fixed charges produce tiered rate structure on a actual cost per kilowatt hour basis (kWh).

Use of average customer owner comparisons are unfair and misleading.

Have you ever met a 750 kWh per month customer owner, perhaps so called average

customer owners are rare.

Fixed charges don’t take advantage of the “Smart Grid” in a way that benefits all

customer owners.

A smart grid does not require fixed charges for customer owner access to the system.

Material Requirement Planning systems (SAP and others) SMUD customer owners have

owned since the late 1990s are underutilized by staff.

Page 6: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Using Material Resource Planning (MRP)

Product structures drives MRP, product structures are like recipes.

Eli Whitney used interchangeable parts and MRP to sell and deliver arms to the U.S.

government, even though some thought it impossible to produce “Lock, Stock and Barrel”

using interchangeable parts at the time.

I have used MRP to manage the production of aircraft, electronic equipment and devices

with billions of parts and operations in continuous operation.

Modern automated MRP makes child’s play of the design, costing and execution of

production, from “batch and queue” to “Just in Time” (JIT) delivery, any type of

production will benefit.

MRP better matches the JIT nature of electricity production, when compared to analog

modeling that uses averages in batch and queue fashion as if the system has ample

storage to queue the batches of electricity.

Page 7: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Before any change in rates and charges

for commodities or services furnished

Perhaps staff have overlooked requirement for statements of sales volumes by customer

types for the preceding two years and estimates of sales volumes for the two years

following for commodities or services furnished in sufficient detail to permit an assessment

of the need for any proposed changes.

Staff appear to not have knowledge of the requirements of the California Public Utilities

Code when it comes supplying information for the public to assess rates and design rate

alternatives.

When I ask for information to produce my alternatives to the general manager’s plan, staff

fail to supply it in sufficient detail to permit assessment of the need for any proposed

changes in rates and charges.

Don’t adopt any rate resolution without sufficient detail to permit an assessment of the

need for any proposed changes.

Page 8: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Residential commodities or services

furnished for 2019 with cost per month

If there are 600,000 residential accounts…

Customer Billing and Contact Center, $8.30 * 600,000 = $ 4,980,000

Customer Information, $3.80 * 600,000 = $2,280,000

Metering, $3.50 * 600,000 = $ 2,100,000

Neighborhood Distribution Facilities, $25.40 * 600,000 = $15,240,000

Total for the above, $41.00 * 600,000 = $24,600,000

System Infrastructure Fixed Charge, $20.30 * 600,000 = $12,180,000 (not enough)

Over 12 million dollars a month come from other rates or charges such as per kWh

charges. Sufficient detail of the above costs, for the preceding two years and estimates of

sales volumes for the two years following are required to permit an assessment of the need

for any proposed changes.

Page 9: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Prepare to find the truth about SMUD rates

You should make “In god we trust, all others bring data” SMUD’s motto when rates and

charges are to be assessed.

Many costs appear fabricated to sound plausible. Require factual data to support

contentions.

Some staff members have personal stake in status quo and will resist changes leading to

making rates and cost recovery fairer and more equitable for all customer owners.

Arlen Orchard’s “pretty big hammer” over SMUD customer owners choices may allow

unfair rates and charges. He has told staff, he hates the term “customer owner” and killed

the board’s “Compact With The Customer”.

Use of MRP will help you find where SMUD looses money and where SMUD makes money.

You may find many rates or charges are based on opinions and not facts.

Page 10: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

Perhaps you should hedge your bets?

Use the tools you already have.

SMUD customer owners bought MRP systems that are underutilized.

Many ad hoc reporters MRP systems use can do the job, if you have knowledgeable staff.

Kitting for a pole replacement or planning for customer owned battery storage that will

increase your ability to deliver real renewable energy to your customer owners, the

process is the same.

Build product structure files, get factual answers.

A much lower head count is required to produce far more actionable information that will

lead to less and shorter board meetings and better outcomes.

Do it to maintain customer owner loyalty as you face of disruption of your business model.

Page 11: Exhibit to Item 2 - Presentation by Steve Uhler

In closing…

Every generation laughs at the old fashions, but follows religiously the new.

Henry David Thoreau

The oldest books are only just out to those who have not read them.

Samuel Butler