EXHIBIT E (Conservation Plan) (Attached)

{00307133.4}

EXHIBIT "E"

(Conservation Plan)

(Attached)

Syngenta Hawaii-Kunia PLAN OVERVIEW January 2015

RESOURCE CONCERNS:

1. Sheet and rill erosion

2. Concentrated flow erosion (ephemeral & classic gullies)

3. Organic matter depletion

4. Excessive sediment in surface water (water erosion rate > 1 ton/acre/year)

PRACTICES THAT ADDRESS CONCERNS:

1. Row Arrangement

2. Deep Tillage

3. Conservation Cover

4. Vegetative Barriers (in lieu of terraces or diversions to minimize earth moving}

5. Cover Crop

6. Residue Management

7. Water and Sediment Retention Basin

OTHER PRACTICES IN CONSERVATION PLAN:

1. Land Clearing

2. Irrigation Water Management

3. Windbreak

4. Natural Vegetation

OTHER PRACTICES CONSIDERED:

1. Terraces (may be strategically installed if vegetative barriers prove ineffective}

2. Diversions

3. Field Borders

4. Filter Strips

5. Crop Rotation

6. Nutrient Management

7. Integrated Pest Management

Natural Resources Conservation Service Resource Concern Checklist

CROP

Client/Business: Syngenta Hawaii LLC Land Units: Kunia

~--------------------------------------Field Office: N/A

Planner: Maglasang Date: ,...1 -1-1/-13-/2.....,.0-14----,

SOIL EROSION: Excessive bank

erosion from streams,

shorelines or water conveyance

channels (REQUIRED)

Are permanent ground cover> 90% and slope< 10%? No

The Assessment below MUST be completed.

Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: RUSLE2, WEP Any "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

Is the water erosion rate ~ T? No

Is the wind rate ~ T? N/A

This is a resource concern in Field All fields.

Do ephemeral gullies occur OR are classic gullies present? Yes The Assessment below MUST be completed.

Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Field measurements, Planner Observations. Any "No" answer to assessment= Resource Concern

Ephemeral Gullies: Are conservation practices and managements in place to prevent or ephemeral gullies?

c Gullies: Is classic gully management adequate to stop the progression head

No

cutting and widening and are offsite impacts are minimized by vegetation and/or structures? Yes

This is a resource concern in : All fields.

Are streams, shorelines or conveyance channels adjacent to the site? Yes


Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Planner Observations, Client input, HSVAP. Answers to assessment are BOTH "No"= Resource Concern

If bank erosion is present, is it beyond the client's control or commensurate with normal Yes geomorphological processes?

Are the following true (when present)? For shorelines and water conve~ance channels : Banks are stable or commensurate with normal geomorphological processes Yes

For stream banks: The HSVAP bank condition element score > 1.4

. This is NOT a resource concern .

Is permanent ground cover< 80%? Yes The Assessment below MUST be completed.

assessment "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

Is the SCI > 0? No

This is a resource concern in Fi : All fields.

PI Conservation Planning Technical Note 1 - Crop Page 1 of 5 August 2014

SOIL QUALITY Are there Histisols present exhibiting subsidence? No DEGRADATION: Assessment below does not need to be completed.

Subsidence Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation "No" answer to assessment ;: Resource Concern Is subsidence adequately managed to meet the client's objectives?

This is NOT a resource concern.

SOIL QUALITY Is soil compaction a problem OR do current farming activities cause soil compaction Yes DEGRADATION: problems?

Compaction The Assessment below MUST be completed. Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observations,

Soil Quality Test Kit, Observation of soil and plant condition "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

Is compaction managed to meet the client's production and management objectives? Yes :'


WATER RESOURCES INSUFFICIENT Is the planned land unit irrigated? Yes

WATER: Inefficient The Assessment below MUST be completed. use of irrigation

Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Visual Assessment, Client input, water

National Engineering Handbook. "No" answer to assessment= Resource Concern (REQUIRED)

Does the irrigation system components and management meet NRCS uniformity and efficiency standards? Yes

.This is NOT a resource concern.

WATER QUALITY: Are organic/inorganic nutrients applied OR is the PLU grazed? Yes Excess nutrients in The Assessment below MUST be completed.

surface and Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation,

ground waters (REQUIRED)

Nutrient budget. Any "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

Are nutrient and amendment applications based on soil or tissue tests and nutrient budgets Yes for realistic yields?

Are conservation practices and managements in place to minimize surface water impacts? Yes

Are conservation practices and managements in place to minimize ground water impacts? Yes


WATER QUALITY Are pest control chemicals applied? DEGRADATION: The Screening question above MUST be completed. Proceed to assessment, if "Yes."

Pesticides Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation, transported to WinPST. Any "No" answer to assessment= Resource Concern surface and

ground waters Are pesticides stored, handled, disposed and managed to prevent runoff, spills, leaks, and Yes

(REQUIRED) leaching?

Are conservation practices and managements in place to minimize surface water impacts? Yes

Are conservation practices and managements in place to minimize ground water impacts? Yes


PI Conservation Planning Technical Note 1 -Crop Page 2 of 5 August 20 14

WATER QUALITY DEGRADATION:

. Excess pathogens and chemicals from manure, biosolids or

compost applications (REQUIRED

EXCESS WATER: · Pending, flooding,

seasonal high water table, and

seeps

INSUFFICIENT WATER: Inefficient

moisture management

WATER QUALITY DEGRADATION: Excessive salts in

surface and ground waters

Are potential sources of pathogens or pharmaceuticals applied on the land? No


Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

Are organic materials applied, stored, and/or handled to mitigate negative impacts to surface water sources?


perma ground cover < streams/shoreline on or adjacent to site?

present, or are Yes

The Assessment below MUST be completed .

Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: RUSLE2, Client input, Planner observation, HSVAP, WEPS. Any "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

Do upslope treatment and buffer practices address concentrated flows to water bodies? Yes

N/A This IS a resource concern in : All fields.

Is excess water a problem OR do current farming activities cause pending/flooding No problems?

Assessment below does not need to be completed. Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation

"No " answer to assessment = Resource Concern Is excess water managed to meet the client's objectives?


Is moisture management a problem OR do current farming activities cause inefficient Yes moisture management?


Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation "No " answer to assessment= Resource Conc.ern

Are runoff and evapotranspiration levels minimized to meet the client's management Yes objectives?


Is salt concentration a limiting factor? No Assessment below does not need to be completed.

Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation. Any "No" answer to assessment= Resource Concern

Are salt concentrations managed to mitigate offsite transport to surface water? Yes Are salt concentrations managed to mitigate offsite transport to ground water? Yes

·--· This is NOT a resource concern.

PI Conservation Planning Technical Note 1 -Crop Page 3 of 5 August 2014

WATER QUALITY Do activities present the potential for contamination? Yes DEGRADATION: The Assessment below MUST be completed.

Petroleum and Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation.

heavy metals and other pollutants

Any "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

transported to Are petroleum, heavy metals or other potential pollutants stored and handled to avoid runoff Yes

receivin~ waters to surface water?

Are petroleum, heavy metals or other potential pollutants stored and handled to avoid Yes leaching to ground water?


WATER QUALITY Is there a water course on or adjacent to the site with State Agency identified temperature No DEGRADATION: impairment OR is water course temperature a client concern?

Elevated water Assessment below does not need to be completed. temperature Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation,

HSVAP. Answers to assessment are BOTH "No"= Resource Concern

Are existing practices in place to address water temperature?

Are both of the following true? HSVAP- riparian condition element score> 0.9

HSVAP- canopy cover element score> 0.9


PLANT DEGRADED Are plant production and health a client concern? Yes

PLANT The Assessment below MUST be completed. CONDITION: Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation,

Undesirable plant Crop Tolerance Table. productivity and Answers to assessment are BOTH "No" = Resource Concern

health Are plants adapted to the site, meet production goals and do not negatively impact other resources? Yes

Is plant damage from wind below Crop Damage Tolerance levels? Yes


DEGRADED Is plant productivity limited from pest pressure? Yes PLANT The Assessment below MUST be completed.

CONDITION: Answer the following questions using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation, Excessive plant

Crop Tolerance Table. Any "No" answer to asses.sment = Resource Concern pest pressure

Is pest damage to plants below economic or environmental thresholds or client-identified criteria? Yes

Are plant pests, including noxious and invasive species managed to meet the client's Yes objectives?


DEGRADED Is wildfire hazard a concern? Yes PLANT The Assessment below MUST be completed.

CONDITION: Answer the followmg quest1on usmg the assessment tools: Client mput, Planner observatiOn Wildfire hazard, "No" answer to assessment= Resource Concern

excessive biomass Are fuel loads and fuel ladders managed to provide defensible space and meet the client's accumulation objectives? Yes


PI Conservation Planning Technical Note 1 - Crop Page 4 of 5 August2014

ANIMAL LIVESTOCK Is the client actively grazing animals? No

PRODUCTION Assessment below does not need to be completed. LIMITATION: Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client Input, Planner observation

Inadequate feed "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern and forage Are livestock forage, roughage and supplemental nutritional requirements addressed?

(Grazing Modifier) This Is NOT a resource concern.

LIVESTOCK Is the client actively grazing animals? No PRODUCTION Assessment below does not need to be completed. LIMITATION: Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation Inadequate "No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern

livestock shelter Do artificial or natural shelters meet animal health needs and client objectives? (Grazing Modifier)


LIVESTOCK Is the client actively grazing animals? No PRODUCTION Assessment below does not need to be completed. LIMITATION- Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation

Inadequate ''No" answer to assessment= Resource Concern livestock water Is water of acceptable quality and quantity adequately distributed to meet animal needs?

(Grazing Modifier)


AIR RESOURCES AIR QUALITY Do activities contribute to nuisance air quality conditions or have episodes/complaints of

IMPACTS: emissions of PM (dust, smoke, exhaust etc.) or chemical drift occurred? Yes Objectionable Nuisance-producing activities: Pesticide application, CAFO I manure management,

Odors Composting, etc.

- The Assessment below MUST be completed. Answer the following question using the assessment tools: Client input, Planner observation

"No" answer to assessment = Resource Concern Are odors managed to meet the client's objectives? Yes


NOTES: -

PI Conservation Planning Technical Note 1 -Crop Page 5 of 5 August 2014

Conservation Plan

SYNGENTA HAWAII, LLC P.O. Box8

Kunia, Hawaii 96759

OBJECTIVES

To grow nursery and production fields of seed corn while implementing conservation practices

that minimize sedimentation and erosior1, do not alter drainage patterns, and protect natural

resources. These conservation practices will help sustain long-term health and productivity of

the land and, in turn, success of the enter prise.

Land Clearing (460)

Removing trees, stumps, brush and other vegetation to prepare land for seed corn operations and to install conservation measures. Debris will be pushed to field edges to naturally decompose or chipped and incorporated into the soil.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

8 42 ac 42 ac

Total 42 ac 42 ac

Sediment Basin (350)

A basin will be constructed to capture and detain runoff to allow sediment to settle out.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 4 1 5 1

Total 2

1

Deep Tillage (324)

The soil will be ripped, plowed, and/or disked to a depth of approximately 18-inches to incorporate plant residue and break compacted soil layers to facilitate water infiltration and root growth. Planned amounts are best estimates as of this plan date; actual amounts may deviate depending upon production requirements.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 1 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac 2 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac 3 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 4 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac 5 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 6 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 7 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac 8 0 ac 60 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac

11 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 30 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac 146 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac 0 ac 0 ac 166 80 ac 80 ac 80 ac 0 ac 0 ac

Total 402 ac 462 ac 432 ac 307 ac 307 ac

Vegetative Barrier (601)

A permanent strip of stiff, dense vegetation will be established and maintained along or close to the field contour, or within watercourses to reduce runoff velocity, trap sediment, and/or direct runoff. In some fields, barrier spacing will be a compromise between slope lengths suggested by RUSLE2 and operational requirements.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2 ft 900 ft 1500 ft 1500 ft ft 3 ft 560 ft 1000 ft 1000 ft ft 4 ft ft 1675 ft 2000 ft ft

5 ft ft 2270 ft 2000 ft ft 6 1500 ft 1500 ft 3000 ft 3000 ft ft 7 1700 ft 1700 ft ft ft ft

8 ft ft 4000 ft ft 4000 ft

Total 3200 ft 4660 ft 13445 ft 9500 ft 4000 ft

2

Row Arrangement

Tillage and planting operations will be conducted on or close to the contour to increase water infiltration and reduce concentrated runoff. Actual acreage amounts will vary depending upon production requirements.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

1 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac

2 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac

3 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac

4 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac

5 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac

6 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac

7 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac

8 0 ac 60 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac

11 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac

30 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac

146 45 ac 45 ac 45 ac 0 ac 0 ac

166 80 ac 80 ac 80 ac 0 ac 0 ac


Cover Crop (340) Sunn hemp, oats, or other grasses, legumes, or forbs will be established during fallow periods to reduce erosion, increase soil organic matter, reduce soil compaction and suppress weeds. Syngenta intends to plant cover crops every year in every field, however, the exact amounts for each field will depend upon seed corn production demands.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

1 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac

2 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac

3 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac

4 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac

5 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac

6 49 ac 49 ac 49 ac 49 ac 49 ac

7 14 ac 14 ac 14 ac 14 ac 14 ac

8 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac

11 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac

30 80 ac 80 ac 80 ac 80 ac 80 ac

146 80 ac 80 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac

166 120 ac 120 ac 0 ac 0 ac 0 ac


3

Residue Management, Seasonal

The amount, orientation, and distribution of plant residue will be managed to maximize soil protection until immediately prior to planting the following crop.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

1 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac 32 ac

2 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac 33 ac

3 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac

4 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac 35 ac

5 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac

6 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac

7 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac 7 ac

8 0 ac 60 ac 30 ac 30 ac 30 ac 11 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac


166 80 ac 80 ac 80 ac 0 ac 0 ac


Irrigation Water Management {449)

The volume, frequency, and allocation of irrigation water will be managed to optimize the use of water resources, to minimize pollution of surface and ground water, and minimize irrigation induced soil erosion.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

1 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac

2 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac 50 ac


5 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 6 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 7 10 ac 10 ac 10 ac 10 ac 10 ac

8 0 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 40 ac 11 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 25 ac 30 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 146 60 ac 60 ac 60 ac 0 ac 0 ac 166 120 ac 120 ac 120 ac 0 ac 0 ac


4

Windbreak

Linear plantings of single or multiple rows of trees will be established along the field border to provide a living visual screen, intercept dust and chemical drift, and enhance aesthetics.

Planned Amount

Field 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

11 2500 ft 3300 ft

Total 2500 ft 3300 ft

This plan consists of general guidelines which were developed from Natural Resources Conservation Service conservation planning directives, standards, and specifications. These can be accessed at: http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov.

To ensure compliance with NRCS standards, guidance from a qualified engineer is recommended for the installatioin of structural practices, e.g., diversions, waterways and sediment basins.

5

CERTIFICATION

I. Syngenta Hawaii, LLC has been fully involved in the planning process and agree to the practices listed in this plan.

II SyngentaHawaii, LLC will implement the practices listed in the plan and accept the responsibilities of: a) ensuring the practices meet or exceed current NRCS specifications, b) complying with applicable federal, state, or county regulations and policies, and c) acquiring any additional permit or approval that may be required before implementing a practice.

Grant Ma ing 'S ~t--Of.evt:<--+i tN16 M~~ v-~YNGENTA HAWAII. LLC

Syngenta Hawaii - Kunia

__;_~""'""-"=-..:.:J~~ 1/ L t./15 Andrew Smith Date Field Operations Manager

West Oahu SWCD

{ ~1/Ji/-1 Date

t/ J ( /.?-t- IC;. -Date

Planner

K 1vt11s t;_.,B Robert Maglasan Conservationist

' & 20/t~ ate

(/)

~

0. <(

~ CC! ....-

:E z 0 -!;{ 0 0 -I c -I co w c:i -u..

0

.!!! c :::::1 ~

C'O 3: C'O :c

C'O ...... c (1) X 0') c $' 'V

Syngenta"-.,. .unia Field 1: -105 acres

N

+ 0 250 500

FIELD 1 - CONSERVA1tON PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

January 2015

- Existing_Waterway

• • • • • • • • Existing_ Windbreak

Existing_ Veg_Barrier

- ·-.. Existing_Road_Diversion

D Field_1_boundary

,.

Syngenta K\..... .:J

Field 1; -104.8 acres

~

X

SOILS MAP

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

R. Mag .ng October 2014

Syngenta K\. " Field 1; -104.8 acres

~X

CONTOUR MAP

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

Field_1_boundary

-- contour5ft_t_hi003

R.Ma~ ~g October2014

Syngentcl:, ~unia Field 2: -88 acres

N

+

FIELD 2 - CONSERVA •• ON PLAN MAP January L.v15

0 250 500 1 ,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

Existing_ Road

Planned_ Vegetative_Barriers

D Fld_2_boundary

Syngenta K\.._ . .J


~

~ /~

SOILS MAP

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

R. Ma~ .ng October 2014

Syngenta ~-- J


~

)( 0 250 500

CONTOUR MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 500 feet

2,000 Feet

R Ma~ .ng October 2014

Field_2_boundary

-- contour5ft_l_hi003

Syngenta \. .unia Field 3: -78 acres

N

+ 0 250 500

FIELD 3- CONSERVATION PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

January 2015

-- Existing_Road

N ... p ~ . .. J Existing_ Conservation_ Cover


-- Planned_Waterway

D Field_3_boundary

Syngenta !<.\..,. ..1


~

}(

SOILS MAP

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

R. Mag•~-.:mg October 2014

Syngenta "''- -' Field 3; -77.5 acres

~

)(

CONTOUR MAP

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

R. Mag, _ _ ,.mg October 2014

Field_3_boundary


Syngenta''- .unia Field 4: -99 acres

N

+ 0 250 500

FIELD 4- CONSERVAltON PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

January 2015

Legend

-·-·· Existing_Road_Diversion

- Existing_Waterway

-- Existing_Road

LLLA Existing_ Vegetative_Barriers


D Planned_Sediment_Basin

D Field_ 4_boundary

Syngenta 1<.'~--J Field 4 ; -98.7 acres

~

}(

SOILS MAP

0 250 500 1 ,000 1 ,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

R. Mag•~~dng October 2014

Syngenta 1\\..... ..i

Field 4 ; ~98.7 acres

~

)( 0 250 500

CONTOUR MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 500 feet

2,000 Feet

R. Mag .... ..,ang October 2014

Field_ 4_beundary

- - contour5ft_l_hi003

Syngenta''- .unia Field 5: -79 acres

N

+ 0 250 500

FIELD 5- CONSERVA110N PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

January 2015

-- Existing_Road

- Existing_Waterway_


D Planned_Sediment_Basin

D Fteld_5_boundary

Syngenta !<:-._ ... Field 5 ; -78.2 acres

~

)(

SOILS MAP

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

R. Mago-..-dng October 2014

Syngenta 1'\\ J

Field 5 ; -78.2 acres

~

)( 0 250 500

CONTOUR MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 500 feet

2,000 Feet

R. Mag .... _dng October 2014

Fiek1_5 _boundary


Syngenta", .unia Field 6: -77 acres

N

+ 0 250 500

FIELD 6 - CONSERVA'hvN PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

January 2015

-- Existing_Road


D Field_6_boundary

Syngenta ~-- ..a Field 6; -76.9 acres

~ 0 250 500

SOILS MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 500 feet

2,000 Feet

R. Ma~ .ng October 2014

Syngenta " '- ..j


~

}(

CONTOUR MAP

o 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 500 feet

__ ,.._

R. Ma£t ,ng October 2014

Field_6_boundary


Syngenta, .unia Field 7: -31' acres

N

+ 0 250 500

FIELD 7- CONSERVA1auN PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

January 2015

-- Existing_Road


D Field_7 _boundary

Syngenta K\ . ..a


N

+ 0 250 500

SOILS MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 500 feet

2,000 Feet

R. Ma!;t .ng October 2014

Syngenta 1\\.~ ..1


N

+ ----------------------------

0 250 500

CONTOUR MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 500 feet

2,000 Feet

R. Ma~ :ng October 2014

Field_7_boundary


Syngenta'-- .unia Field 8: -118 acres

D Existing_Retention_Basin

- Existing_Naturai_Waterway

m~<A Natural_ Vegetation

- Field_Road


D Fld8_boundary

FIELD 8 - CONSERVA-, .0N PLAN MAP

0 250 500 1,000

--January 2015

N

1,500 2,000 Feet +

Syngenta K-_ ... Field 8; -117.5 acres

~

~ ~

0 250 500

SOILS MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 596 feet

KyB: Kunia silty clay, 3-8% slopes KyC: Kunia silty clay, 8-12% slopes McC2: Mahana silty clay loam, 6-12% slopes Mc02: Mahana silty clay loam, 12-20% slopes KuD: Kolekole silty clay loam 12-25% slopes

2,000 Feet

R. Mas .ng October 2014

Syngent~ :unia Field 8:-1 ra acres


FIELD 8 - CONTOUKS

0 250 500 1,000

-.,

January z015

N

1,500 2,000 Feet +

Syngenta·....__ .unia Field 11 :-110 acres

N

+ 0 250 500

FIELD 11 - CONSERVA1ION PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

·.

January 2015

- Existing_ Natural_ Waterway

~}.:;~-::..;_-(] NaturaiVegetation

••••••• • Windbreak

D Fld11_boundary

Syngenta'-.unia Field 30:-230 acres


t) ;\'~~;.:i NaturaiVegetation

-- Existing_Diversion

D Field_30_boundary

FIELD 30 -CONSERVAtiON PLAN MAP January 2015

N 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet +

Syngenta K...._ -i


0 250 500 1,000 N

+

SOILS MAP

1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 750 feet

R. Ma!;J .ng October 2014

MuB: Molokai silty clay loam, 3-7% slopes MuG: Molokai silty clay loam, 7-15% slopes WzA: Waipahu silty clay, 0-2% slopes WzC: Waipahu silty clay, 6-12% slopes

Syngenta !<.."...... ... Field 30; -229.8 acres

N

+

CONTOUR MAP

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet ,------.--------,.--- - - - --,.----- - --.

1 inch = 750 feet

R. Ma~ ng October 2014

Field_30 _boundary


Syngenta'- .unia Field 146:-186 acres

~~ 0 250 500

FIELD 146- CONSER"ATION PLAN MAP

1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet

January 2015


f,~}~: ~:/:) NaturaiVegetation

CJ Field_146_boundary

Syngenta K\.- . ..t Field 146; -185.5 acres

0 250 500

~~

SOILS MAP

1,000 1,500

1 inch = 500 feet

laA: lahaina silty clay, 0-3% slopes laB: lahaina silty clay, 3-7% slopes

R. Ma£1 .ng October 2014

MuA: Molokai silty clay loam, 0-3% slopes MuC: Molokai silty clay loam, 7-15% slopes HlMG: Hetemano silty clay, 30-90 %. slopes KIB: Kawaihapai clay loam, 2-6% slopes

2,000 Feet

Syngenta Kb. ... d


0 250 500

<~

CONTOUR MAP

1,000 1,500 2.000 Feet

1 inch = 750 feet

R. Mag. .ng October 2014

Field_146_boundary

- - contour5ft_t_hi003

---,_

Syngenta"'Kunia Field 166; -233.5 acres FIELD 166 CONSERVATION PLAN MAP January 2015

- Existing_Road

0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet - Existing_Waterway

~~ 1 inch = 500 feet D Field_166_boundary

Syngenta K..__ ...~


0 250 500 1.000

<~

SOILS MAP

1,500 2,000 Feet

1 inch = 750 feet

KyA: Kunia silty clay, 0-3% slopes WaA: Wahiawa silty clay, 0-3% slopes LaB: Lahaina silty clay, 3-7% slopes

R. Mas .ng October 2014

KIB: Kawaihapai silty clay loam, 2-6% slopes HLMG: Helemano silty clay, 30-90 % slopes

Syngenta ~<'-- ...1


<~

CONTOUR MAP

0 250 500 1.000 1,500 2,000 Feet r r ----- T -- --------.---------,

1 inch = 750 feet

R. Ma& .ng October 2014

Field_166_boundary


EXHIBIT E (Conservation Plan) (Attached)

Documents

Transcript of EXHIBIT E (Conservation Plan) (Attached)