Exhibit 1 - Topsham, Maine95A28B10-4485-4BEC...EXHIBIT A All that parcel of land labeled "N/F Joyce...

tjones1

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 1

Front Elevation Scale: ¼” = 1’-0”

Source: Hammond Lumber


Right Elevation Scale: ¼” = 1’-0”


Left Elevation Scale: ¼” = 1’-0”

10

’-0

” C

lg. H

eigh

t io

n o

ffic

e TB

D


Rear Elevation Scale: ¼” = 1’-0”

tjones1

Typewritten Text

TYPICAL

EXISTING CONDITIONS

1. Right of Way 4,432 sf

2. Driveway on Site 4,518 sf

3. Shed 285 sf

4. Box Trailer 320 sf

5. Landscape Materials

Stockpile 6,048 sf

6. Exposed Ledge 4,256 sf

7. Parking Area 3,584 sf

SUBTOTAL 23,443 sf Impervious Area

8. Scrub Overgrowth 2,100 sf

9. Mature Undisturbed

Vegetation 61,577 sf

SUBTOTAL 63,677 sf Vegetated

TOTAL 2 ACRES 87,120 sf

FUTURE CONDITIONS (Approx. Areas)

1. Right of Way 4,432 sf No Change

2. Driveway on Site 4,518 sf No Change

3. Shed - Removed

4. Box Trailer - Removed

5. Landscape Materials

Stockpile 2,487 sf Reduced

6. Exposed Ledge 4,256 sf No Change

7. Parking Area 3,584 sf No Change

SUBTOTAL 19,277 sf Impervious Area

8. Scrub Overgrowth 2,100 sf No Change

9. Mature Undisturbed

Vegetation 61,577 sf No Change

10. New Garage w/Apron 3,168 sf New

11. Well 2 sf New

12. Motor Fuel Storage 96 sf New

13. Sanitary Wastewater 700 sf New

14. Gray Waste Water 200 sf New

TOTAL 2 ACRES 87,120 sf

15. Drip Edge Drainage 132 sf Pervious

16. Organic Mulch Filter

Berm TBD Pervious

EXHIBIT 11

CLOUTIER LANDSCAPING, INC.

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS

August 28, 2017

Resource Systems Engineering

Copyright 2017

tjones1

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 12

tjones1

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 17

tjones1

Typewritten Text

Refer to Formal Site Plan Review Application per Carol Eyerman, AICP, Assistant Planner, Topsham

tjones1

Typewritten Text

Exhibit 2

EXHIBIT A

All that parcel of land labeled "N/F Joyce Crosman and Beverly Groves, 54.23

Acres" on a certain survey entitled "Standard Boundary Survey for Gary & Glen Cloutier by Little River Land Surveying dated January 23, 2013 and revised February 18, 2013" which Survey is recorded in the Sagadahoc County Registry of Deeds at Plan Book 49, Page 2.

Also granting and conveying a certain 50 foot wide easement over and across that property portrayed as "N/F Joyce A. Crosman & Sandra M. Labbe" on the above· referenced survey running from River Road northwesterly to a staging area as portrayed which is on the Grantors' land hereby conveyed. This 50 foot wide easement may be used for all purposes, including ingress and egress by motor vehicle and by foot, and for all utilities. This 50 foot wide easement may be used for residential as well as commercial purposes.

Excepting and reserving an easement for access from River Road for the benefit of that property now or formerly of Penny J. O'Connell as portrayed on the

above referenced survey.

Toxr otTophmnFub6c Worb Depuanent,IFPLTCANON FOR E!;TR

(ForOtlkrUE OBIY)

Application No:DateReceived:

r\pplicant: t.6t*c+ tluw4Zrn --t Il

Contractor Performin g Work:

fr,*,1 L'LL^ ., {rnsProwrtv O*ner:cL,'o tl,r,liifL;rq L l.,u h+p-

"ii'X- u'u Ar T,f 1,,,,-,

3i3 (,wwvLg P-,1 . iSwti

Address:

.atiJruwst t'ic' lt- .

Address:

Si'rtut-t

Applicanls Phonc No.:7)1-c' t''tl / t'" t.t 'f

Contractors Phone No.:725 -'1 i3 L,3

O*rcr's Phone No..9cr*a M iA"'o

ll-Llour On Call Phone No I Coutact Person (ifdrflerent lronr applicant) , -I Aos tU*Lrnn Prq4 L*5,3€ e \cuS '7A t-731Pi l,ocation of Entrance:

!42- P.,'trn fZJ ..

(strect Bo$ Numbel & Name of Street

Lot High*rl Frontage.,/5b , E'l

'[ar [D Propern'; lv{ap Page:

. NIap Lot:i32t€8PJa'l

P.t>t- 64q -8 'eo t

Srrhlivision Name: _Subdivision Lot:

P;inciplc Use of I'rop--rtr: -, l{esidential

P.,'rr.tri 4o L"+ fr-pConrmercial

$hu^y :e* .

I ()thcr

iDr'srrihe Lsc)

_ Oe!:!_Ailtting 8"t."".q (rlist:lnce,sittfet:t)-:lttTtliJttrEnrl,tn.'c !surl.cci ctrlscn

f:tlgc oircud i Ctrrb t'.'pc

trr l)ilrc Clcntcr :

l:,'hl'..l'.rr,.lr

. I l.l.ill':

Ye.:\.'

Srt!ertalh

)ir'i i'l\pc | .-.=--] - i, i '\t '1't'v'ithi'r 1 l':1. I'i;'c i t cngtir l)cptlt t

. cJg.r I I'r_o!.*rt: i 1g"'l i Si.:. .fipe | ' ,.:1.- i

: ------------- |

.-;' i r;,.. r \r-'rr': j | :Cr)r'iru: I lliiL ;

Surl,rict\ Ii{

Dct:ril Proposctl Entranccs tanccs in fcctSitlc*llk -T-l\,** t'"t;Ta

Curh trpc Stirtlcctlt\

lVidth Entrancc Culvcrtl\itr

I r \r

i cdgcr\t

[)roprtrLinc

iithinTosllVuul

P4:cSrz':

['iircl'ypc

! trl'

! tloa.ttlibD 3bt

n"pttr fT'.4.";t r*.tcrl' I to I'i1o- CcntcrCovcr I

rt I i<'Dic Safc Ticket#" 9 cocl {tProposctl Starl oa

htblicVork DepatM,TPPLICATION

Application No:Page Two

Describe hoposed Entrac{s) on sketch belorvor attach sketcb or plan to this application.

Shorv proposed entftnce locations, *idtb, and arrangerren! distance bet*'een enffiices; setback (from edge of rat'eled way) ofbuildings, gasoline pumps, etc.; locatiotr of existing culvertg pipes, catch basim, sunholes, curbing gutrer, and side*zlla; and

the local.ion of sroposed culverts, ditches, curbing, and si&walks.

FORENTFg{.}iCE

"Pt+o/ase0'D+;vewf iCo rr Srn*$ f t o-'

LlrZ ?'''<vt &{'

'l#)i!*,*E

'-To'Pxi'

R,o.w\l1 - -

+-

Y\iD?LS-r€ Cdl-vErtTt

e-- e' Drrc H

3aL

r'

EaA€ o€ ,?P

' Chcck hcrc il'sketch or plan is irrlachL{. I'lease rctirence thc siictch or pkn to liiis aprplication

-I No excavariou rvork is to corrunen€ until DIG SAFE and all urdergrorurd tbciliry* operators have been dullnotifred o[rhe rvork rhrcr: (i) business days in adr-ance Ln accordance rvith the current Statc olMlinc statutor"

r'.'quiremenLs.I .tti trork must conforn to lhe requiremenrs of the Entrance PErmit and the crrrent copl of the Rightot'-*'lri' a-i

issued by Utc To\rn of ToPsharn.J Fee:

Strtcment of 4g!ggmg4t

I am dul.v authorized to execute this application and have rerierved and rvill conrply *ith the above. I further agrce to comp_Il;

wirh all iequirernents of the Entrance p-en"it and agree to pajv any subsequert chargcs *hich may- become due as a resrilt of m1

.5tsrt abvtgl-Ya-T

Rp

tailrre to comply with any of the permit requirements of the right-of rvay

WI Cherk hcre ifEnrrancc Site Inspcrtion R.:pofl isatlachcd-

lFor O[Tic". Usc Onl;")

tjones1

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT 3

tjones1

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT 4

August 28 2017 Resource Systems Engineering

Copyright 2017

Exhibit 5 Cloutier

Landscaping, Inc. Photos

Existing Conditions

United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture

A product of the NationalCooperative Soil Survey,a joint effort of the UnitedStates Department ofAgriculture and otherFederal agencies, Stateagencies including theAgricultural ExperimentStations, and localparticipants

Custom Soil ResourceReport forAndroscoggin andSagadahocCounties, Maine

NaturalResourcesConservationService

August 23, 2017

tjones1

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT 6

PrefaceSoil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide informationabout the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed formany different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urbanplanners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, wastedisposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,protect, or enhance the environment.

Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may imposespecial restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soilproperties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects ofsoil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible foridentifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.

Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider areaplanning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in somecases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineeringapplications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State SoilScientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951).

Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils areseasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as afoundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use asseptic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited tobasements or underground installations.

The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United StatesDepartment of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including theAgricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural ResourcesConservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the NationalCooperative Soil Survey.

Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is availablethrough the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all itsprograms and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or apart of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Notall prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

2

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/

https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?cid=nrcs142p2_053951

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voiceand TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office ofCivil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 orcall (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunityprovider and employer.

3

ContentsPreface.................................................................................................................... 2How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8

Soil Map................................................................................................................9Legend................................................................................................................10Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 12Map Unit Descriptions........................................................................................ 12

Androscoggin and Sagadahoc Counties, Maine.............................................14AaC—Adams loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes......................................14AaD—Adams loamy sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes....................................14HsC—Hollis very rocky fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes................ 15NgB—Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes................................16

References............................................................................................................18

4

How Soil Surveys Are MadeSoil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneousareas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneousareas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties andlimitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops andnative plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soilprofiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. Theprofile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which thesoil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material isdevoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by otherbiological activity.

Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resourceareas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units thatshare common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, waterresources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil surveyareas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.

The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern thatis related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of thearea. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kindof landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils andmiscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specificsegments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how theywere formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predictwith a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at aspecific location on the landscape.

Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as theircharacteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soilscientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe onlya limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplementedby an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient toverify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.

Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. Theynoted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rockfragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable themto identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining theirproperties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soilcharacteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis forcomparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomicclassification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and characterof soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

5

scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared theindividual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so thatthey could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience andresearch.

The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; theobjective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments thathave similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by aunique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictableproportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other componentsof the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no waydiminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of suchlandforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for thedevelopment of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsiteinvestigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.

Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale ofmapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine thesoil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils atspecific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smallernumber of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those forcontent of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soiltypically vary from one point to another across the landscape.

Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges ofcharacteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Directmeasurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unitcomponent. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of otherproperties.

While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generallyare collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientistsinterpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observedcharacteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of thesoils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested throughobservation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some newinterpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from othersources, such as research information, production records, and field experience ofspecialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of managementare assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the samekinds of soil.

Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also onsuch variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable overlong periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil willhave a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predictthat a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.

After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in thesurvey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report

6

identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.


7

Soil MapThe soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list ofsoil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbolsdisplayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used toproduce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

8

9

Custom Soil Resource ReportSoil Map

4866

500

4866

530

4866

560

4866

590

4866

620

4866

650

4866

680

4866

710

4866

740

4866

770

4866

800

4866

500

4866

530

4866

560

4866

590

4866

620

4866

650

4866

680

4866

710

4866

740

4866

770

419370 419400 419430 419460 419490 419520 419550 419580

419370 419400 419430 419460 419490 419520 419550 419580

43° 56' 59'' N70

° 0

' 17'

' W43° 56' 59'' N

70° 0

' 7'' W

43° 56' 49'' N

70° 0

' 17'

' W

43° 56' 49'' N

70° 0

' 7'' W

N

Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 19N WGS840 50 100 200 300

Feet0 20 40 80 120

MetersMap Scale: 1:1,510 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.

Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

Area of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)

SoilsSoil Map Unit Polygons

Soil Map Unit Lines

Soil Map Unit Points

Special Point FeaturesBlowout

Borrow Pit

Clay Spot

Closed Depression

Gravel Pit

Gravelly Spot

Landfill

Lava Flow

Marsh or swamp

Mine or Quarry

Miscellaneous Water

Perennial Water

Rock Outcrop

Saline Spot

Sandy Spot

Severely Eroded Spot

Sinkhole

Slide or Slip

Sodic Spot

Spoil Area

Stony Spot

Very Stony Spot

Wet Spot

Other

Special Line Features

Water FeaturesStreams and Canals

TransportationRails

Interstate Highways

US Routes

Major Roads

Local Roads

BackgroundAerial Photography

The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at1:15,800.

Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.

Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can causemisunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soilline placement. The maps do not show the small areas ofcontrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailedscale.

Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for mapmeasurements.

Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL:Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)

Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercatorprojection, which preserves direction and shape but distortsdistance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as theAlbers equal-area conic projection, should be used if moreaccurate calculations of distance or area are required.

This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data asof the version date(s) listed below.

Soil Survey Area: Androscoggin and Sagadahoc Counties,MaineSurvey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 15, 2016

Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales1:50,000 or larger.

Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Dec 31, 2009—Oct13, 2016

The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines werecompiled and digitized probably differs from the background


10

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minorshifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.


11

Map Unit Legend

Androscoggin and Sagadahoc Counties, Maine (ME606)

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

AaC Adams loamy sand, 8 to 15percent slopes

7.0 57.4%

AaD Adams loamy sand, 15 to 30percent slopes

0.8 6.7%

HsC Hollis very rocky fine sandyloam, 8 to 15 percent slopes

1.9 15.6%

NgB Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 8percent slopes

2.5 20.2%

Totals for Area of Interest 12.2 100.0%

Map Unit DescriptionsThe map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent thesoils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, alongwith the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.

A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or moremajor kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and namedaccording to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomicclass there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On thelandscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have thecharacteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of someobserved properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped withoutincluding areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is madeup of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minorcomponents that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.

Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in themap unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are callednoncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in aparticular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have propertiesand behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require differentmanagement. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. Theygenerally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of thescale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areasare identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for agiven area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unitdescriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minorcomponents may not have been observed, and consequently they are notmentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that itwas impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils andmiscellaneous areas on the landscape.


12

The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes theusefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineatepure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms orlandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Thedelineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for thedevelopment of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneousareas.

An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soilproperties and qualities.

Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except fordifferences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have majorhorizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.

Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On thebasis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areasshown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phasecommonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alphasilt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.

Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.

A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricatepattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similarin all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.

An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils ormiscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of presentor anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not consideredpractical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. Thepattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhatsimilar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areasthat could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similarinterpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportionof the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area canbe made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be madeup of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.

Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soilmaterial and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.


13

Androscoggin and Sagadahoc Counties, Maine

AaC—Adams loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes

Map Unit SettingNational map unit symbol: 9kcdElevation: 300 to 2,200 feetMean annual precipitation: 30 to 48 inchesMean annual air temperature: 37 to 46 degrees FFrost-free period: 70 to 160 daysFarmland classification: Not prime farmland

Map Unit CompositionAdams and similar soils: 85 percentEstimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Adams

SettingLandform: Outwash terracesDown-slope shape: ConvexAcross-slope shape: ConvexParent material: Sandy glaciofluvial deposits derived from crystallin rock

Typical profileH1 - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sandH2 - 4 to 24 inches: loamy sandH3 - 24 to 40 inches: fine sand

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 8 to 15 percentDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesNatural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drainedCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (6.00

to 20.00 in/hr)Depth to water table: More than 80 inchesFrequency of flooding: NoneFrequency of ponding: NoneAvailable water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.0 inches)

Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 4eHydrologic Soil Group: AHydric soil rating: No

AaD—Adams loamy sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes

Map Unit SettingNational map unit symbol: 9kcfElevation: 300 to 2,200 feet


14

Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 48 inchesMean annual air temperature: 37 to 46 degrees FFrost-free period: 70 to 160 daysFarmland classification: Not prime farmland

Map Unit CompositionAdams and similar soils: 86 percentEstimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Adams

SettingLandform: Outwash terracesDown-slope shape: ConvexAcross-slope shape: ConvexParent material: Sandy glaciofluvial deposits derived from crystallin rock

Typical profileH1 - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sandH2 - 4 to 24 inches: loamy sandH3 - 24 to 40 inches: fine sand

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 15 to 30 percentDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesNatural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drainedCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (6.00

to 20.00 in/hr)Depth to water table: More than 80 inchesFrequency of flooding: NoneFrequency of ponding: NoneAvailable water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.0 inches)

Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 6eHydrologic Soil Group: AHydric soil rating: No

HsC—Hollis very rocky fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes

Map Unit CompositionHollis and similar soils: 85 percentEstimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hollis

SettingLandform: HillsLandform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summitLandform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, crestDown-slope shape: ConvexAcross-slope shape: Convex


15

Parent material: Coarse-loamy supraglacial meltout till derived from mica schist

Typical profileH1 - 0 to 2 inches: gravelly fine sandy loamH2 - 2 to 15 inches: channery fine sandy loamR - 15 to 19 inches: bedrock

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 8 to 15 percentPercent of area covered with surface fragments: 1.6 percentDepth to restrictive feature: 10 to 20 inches to lithic bedrockNatural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drainedCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately

high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)Depth to water table: More than 80 inchesFrequency of flooding: NoneFrequency of ponding: NoneAvailable water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.7 inches)

Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 6sHydrologic Soil Group: DHydric soil rating: No

NgB—Ninigret fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes

Map Unit SettingNational map unit symbol: 9kdxElevation: 20 to 2,000 feetMean annual precipitation: 34 to 48 inchesMean annual air temperature: 37 to 46 degrees FFrost-free period: 80 to 160 daysFarmland classification: All areas are prime farmland

Map Unit CompositionNinigret and similar soils: 85 percentEstimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Ninigret

SettingLandform: Outwash terracesLandform position (three-dimensional): TreadDown-slope shape: ConvexAcross-slope shape: LinearParent material: Coarse-loamy glaciofluvial deposits derived from slate

Typical profileH1 - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loamH2 - 8 to 28 inches: fine sandy loamH3 - 28 to 65 inches: loamy fine sand


16

Properties and qualitiesSlope: 0 to 8 percentDepth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inchesNatural drainage class: Moderately well drainedCapacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to

high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr)Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inchesFrequency of flooding: NoneFrequency of ponding: NoneAvailable water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.7 inches)

Interpretive groupsLand capability classification (irrigated): None specifiedLand capability classification (nonirrigated): 2wHydrologic Soil Group: CHydric soil rating: No


17

ReferencesAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of samplingand testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification ofsoils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification ofwetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and WildlifeService FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydricsoils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262

Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification formaking and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources ConservationService, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577

Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580

Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service andDelaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, WetlandsSection.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps ofEngineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station TechnicalReport Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

18

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262






http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053624

United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Landcapability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf


19

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242



http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf

Existing sheds to be removed

48’x26’ Paved Entrance

Covered Fuel Storage 8’x 12’

Drilled Well Water Supply

Gray Water 10’x20’

August 28, 2017

Copyright 2107

Existing Culvert (18”x28’) (PVC Pipe)

8’x40’

10’1” x 29’ 3”

Existing Culvert (18”x 28’) (PVC Pipe)

24’ Chain Gate

Rooftop runoff Stone lined Drip Edge Drain 2’ w x 3’ deep, Filtered 4” perf. Soil drain pipe

Gasoline Silt & Stormwater Organic Filter Berm

P O Box K Brunswick, Maine 04011 (207) 725-7896 [email protected]

Cloutier Landscaping, Inc. 432 River Road, Topsham

Future Conditions

August 25, 2017

Project #: 170707

Sheet # C-002

Source: Standard Boundary Survey Plan dated 1/23/2013 Rev. 2/18/2013 by Little River Land Surveying

Exhibit 7

Exhibit 8 Roof Drain System

Source: Dripline Trench, Portland, Maine Water District, May 2006

2’

4’ deep

Source: Official Zoning Map

Town of Topsham

May 20, 2015

August 28, 2017


Copyright 2017

Exhibit 13 Cloutier Landscaping, Inc.

Topsham Zone R2

130

Exhibit 14 Cloutier Landscaping

Topsham

Topography 2 foot Contour Intervals

Source: State of Maine Geographic Information Systems

Approximate Location of New Maintenance Garage/Office

August 28, 2017


Copyright 2017


Topsham

General Land Cover

Approximate Location of New Maintenance Garage/Office

August 28, 2017


Copyright 2017

Site Plan Application 6 Revised April 29, 2015

III. FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION

Project Name: Cloutier Landscaping, Inc.

Project Location: River Road, Topsham Tax Map: R01-1 Lot: 45B-1

Street Address: 432 River Road, Topsham, ME 04086 Book 2603 Page #: 329

1. Project Applicant: Name: Glen Cloutier / Gary Cloutier

Address: 1547 Augusta Rd, Bowdoin, ME 04287 / 293 Coombs

Rd. Brunswick, ME 04011

Phone/Fax: (207) 751-1934 (Glen Cloutier)

Email Address: [email protected]

2. Present Interests in Property: Property is presently owned (see Exhibit 1) Property is served

by a Deeded Right-of-Way (Exhibit 2)

Interest in Property within 500’: The Cloutier’s own 54 acres abutting the development site

to the North and West (see Survey Plan: Exhibit 3)

3. Description of Project: Building a maintenance garage for Cloutier Landscaping with an

administration office and dry storage

4. Project Property Name: SAME

Owner (If Different):

Address:

Phone/Fax:

Email Address:

5. Project Authorized Name: Charles F. Wallace, Jr., P.E.,

Representative Resource Systems Engineering

(If Different): Address: P O Box K, Brunswick, ME 04011


Phone/Fax: (207)725-7896 / (2074) 729-6245


6. Design Consultants:

X Surveyor Architect Planner/Engineer

Name: Jeremiah J. Raitt, ME PLS #2376

Little River Land Surveying

Address: P O Box 332

Lisbon Falls, ME 04252

Telephone/Fax: (207) 841-0056


Surveyor X Architect Planner/Engineer

Name: Hammond Lumber

Address: 20 Spring Street

Brunswick, ME 04011

Telephone/Fax: (207) 729-9924

Email Address:

Surveyor Architect X Planner/Engineer

Name: Charles F. Wallace, Jr., P.E.


Address: P O Box K

Brunswick, ME 04011

Telephone/Fax: (207) 725-7896 / (207) 729-6245



List additional Design Consultants on a separate sheet.

7. Address to which all correspondence Name: Charles F. Wallace, Jr., P.E.

is to be sent:

Address: P O Box K

Brunswick, ME 04011

Phone/Fax: (207) 725-7896 / (207) 729-6245


8. Zoning at the Time of Application R2 – Suburban Residential

8a. Is activity within 200’ of water body? Yes

identified floodplain? Yes No

No X . If yes, is it within

9. Acreage of Property: Total: 2 acres (87,120 s.f.)

To be developed: 4,166 sf

9a. Gross Floor Area: 3,168 s.f. Ground Coverage: 998 s.f. (includes septic system)

Percent Lot Coverage For Each Structure: 5%

10. Method of Infrastructure:

Facility Type

Provision of Water: on-site drilled well (see site plan)

Sewage Disposal: on-site: see HHE200 Rev. 8/2011 Exhibit 4

Fire Protection: per NFPA30 & Topsham Fire Chief. Planned is portable

fire extinguishers

Road System: existing / already constructed – see photos (Exhibit 5) and

Survey Plan (Exhibit 3)

Electric and Other Utility: subsurface electric only


Solid Waste: on-site dumpster, hauled off-site

11. List any Covenants, By-Laws, Restrictions or Easements to be replaced on any deeds:

See attached Deed for Parcel and Right-of-way (Exhibits 1 and 2)

Is full text attached? Yes X No

12. Please describe the existing use of the property to be developed and the

neighboring property:

Existing use of property is storage of landscape materials

Neighboring properties are residential

13. Please list existing soil conditions as described by either a soil scientist,

geologist, engineer or SCS medium-intensity soil surveys:

Compacted gravel fill in disturbed area

See attached Exhibit 6 SCS Medium Intensity Soil Survey

14. Please describe the proposed use (i.e. number of staff, operating hours, etc).

Office and Garage per site plan

Staff: 12 Operating Hours: 6 am – 8 pm

14a. Please describe the sedimentation and erosion controls to be employed in

the development and maintenance of the project:

Three foot high mulch and compost erosion control berm downslope as shown on Site Plan

(Exhibit 7) Roof/Apron Drip Edge Drain System (Exhibit 8)


15. List all property owners within 200 feet of the proposed development (Attach a list if

necessary):

Name Address Map # Lot #

Beverly Groves 416 River Rd, Topsham R01-1 45F

Joyce Crosman 430 River Rd, Topsham R01-1 45B

Timothy Wilbur 448 River Rd, Topsham R01-1 45D

Beverly Groves 462 River Rd, Topsham R01-1 45E

16. Evidence of notification to property owners and town officials. Please attach a copy of the

letter and a complete list of names and addresses of those who have been notified.

(by Topsham Planning Department)

17. List any Variances required before any proposal may proceed:

N/A

18. Construction Schedule (please attach). Begin September 2017, Completion December

2017

19. Please list waivers granted by the Planning Board during Sketch Plan Review

(Please attach if necessary):

N/A


20. Final Plan Application Fee:

Amount: $350.00

Date Received: 8/28/17

21. Please note that a hearing fee of may be required, if the Planning Board

deems it necessary at the time of Final Plan application presentation.

22. Please complete the following:

Attachment III-1 Performance Standards

Attachment III-2 Map Requirements

Attachment III-3 Supporting Documents

23. Is the property of the developed presently under tree growth or farmland/ open space tax

exemptions? Yes No X

To the best of my knowledge, all the information submitted in this Final Plan Application

package is true and correct.

Authorized Signature for Applicant Charles F. Wallace, Jr., P.E. Resource Systems Engineering

August 28, 2017

Date .......................................................................................................................................................

FOR STAFF APPROVAL In accordance with Town of Topsham Site Plan Review Ordinance –

Chapter 175-5B.1, of the Topsham Code.

Town Planner Date

Codes Enforcement Officer Date

Fire Chief Date

Police Chief Date

Road Commissioner Date


Please describe the potential impact or effect on the following performance standards from

Chapter 175-8, of the Topsham Code. If there is an impact or effect, please describe how you

intend to minimize those impacts.

A. Landscape Preservation : See Landscape Plan Exhibit 9. Existing landscape and vegetation

to remain

B. Building Relationship to Environment: See Architectural Sketches Exhibit 10 and Site Plan

Exhibit 7. Building is residential scale and similar in appearance to a residential structure.

C. Vehicular Access Control: Existing driveway and R.O.W., includes a new security gate.

D. Parking and Circulation: See Site Plan Exhibit 7

E. Stormwater Runoff: Stormwater runoff will be equal or less than existing conditions. See

Exhibit 11 for impervious surface calculations and Site Plan Exhibit 7.

F. Existing Utilities: NONE

G. Signs: None at this time

H. Special Features: See Site Plan Exhibit 7 and Landscape Plan Exhibit 9.

I. Outside Lighting: Building mounted LED security wall packs with cutoff to minimize off-

site lighting to be equal or less than 0.5 foot candles on neighboring property. See Exhibit

12.

J. Emergency Access: See Site Plan Exhibit 7.

K. Municipal Services: No change required. Relocating existing operation from a nearby

property.

L. Water Quality: Stormwater runoff to be controlled by drip edge drain system and

compost/mulch filter berm.

M. Air Quality: No impact on Air Quality

N. Future Water Supplies: New drilled well

O. Existing Water Supplies: N/A

P. Erosion Control: Site grading, drip edge drainage system, vegetated runoff area and

compost/mulch filter berm.

Q. Sewage Disposal: on-site with separate gray water (See HHE200 Form Exhibit 4)

R. Natural Beauty; Historic Sites: No Impact N/A


S. Shoreland Areas: N/A

PLEASE ATTACH A SEPARATE DESCRIPTION IF NECESSARY.


ATTACHMENT III-(3)

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

DOCUMENT

TYPE

DATE

REQUESTED

DATE RECEIVED

BY PLANNING BOARD

Documentation of ownership or contract EXHIBIT 1 & 2

Homeowner’s Association by-laws N/A

Covenants Homeowner’s Association N/A

Deed Restrictions, state permits N/A

DEP N/A

Marine Resources N/A

Army Corps of Engineers N/A

Inland Fish and Wildlife N/A

Appropriate Engineering Calculations EXHIBIT 11

Community Facilities Impact Analysis N/A

Statement from Brunswick Topsham

Water District

N/A

Impact Statement and/ or Assessment N/A

Sewer District (off-site) N/A

Plumbing Inspector (on-site)

Road Commissioner N/A

Police Chief (if required) N/A

Conservation Commission N/A


DOCUMENT

TYPE

DATE

REQUESTED

DATE RECEIVED

BY PLANNING BOARD

Solid Waste Coordinator N/A

Recreation Commission

N/A

Other Appropriate Town Agencies

Appropriate Performance Guarantee

Arrangement

Escrow Account

$1,200.00

Evidence of notification to property

owners within 200’ of this project BY

TOPSHAM PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Resource

Systems

Engineering

30 Parkers Way Brunswick, Maine 04011 207 725-7896

August 28, 2017

File # 170707

Town of Topsham

Planning Department

100 Main Street

Topsham, Maine 04086

Attn: Carol Eyerman, AICP, Assistant Planner

Reference: Cloutier Landscaping, Inc., 432 River Road, Topsham, Maine

Subject: Formal Site Plan Review Application and Conditional Use Permit Application.

Dear Ms. Eyerman,

Attached please find an original and 18 copies of Cloutier Landscaping’s Application (Cloutier) for

Formal Site Plan Review. This project is for an existing business on an adjacent parcel with no net

increase in public utility services. We are submitting the Application today, August 28, 2017 with the

intention of attending the September 5, 2017 Planning Board meeting. Application Fees of $350.00 for

Site Plan, $150.00 for Conditional Use and Escrow Fee of $1,200.00 are enclosed.

Highlights are as follows:

Cloutier is planning a Low Impact Development (LID) as defined in Chapter 3 of the Maine Department

of Environmental Protection Best Management Practices Design Manual. LID features include:

1. Selection of an architectural style that has been selected to be compatible with the rural

residential neighborhood that includes maximum screening from neighbors with existing

mature trees and vegetation.

2. Maximum maintenance of existing vegetation with no mature tree cutting and minimal

clearing of grasses and scrub shrub vegetation.

3. Lot coverage is approximately 5% and reutilization of existing disturbed areas.

4. No net increase in impervious surface. Existing sheds to be removed.

5. Access is by an existing, compacted gravel driveway via a 50 foot compacted gravel Right of

Way.

6. Site is currently used for landscape materials storage. Exposed ledge adjacent to proposed

parking.

7. Area to be developed is currently cleared and is on filled compacted gravel.

8. No basic changes from existing drainage features, culverts and slopes for stormwater

management. On site drainage will remain via natural drainage swales protected by organic

mulch berm down slope from proposed garage. Roof and entrance pad to be served by an

infiltration drip edge drainage system.

9. No floor drains inside garage and on site sanitary and gray water systems.

10. Underground electric service.

11. On site drilled well.

12. Contained and covered motor fuel storage with NFPA Code fire protection.

13. Minimal lighting for security and safety with building mounted, cut-off luminaire wall packs

and less than 0.5 foot-candles of off-site impact.

Cloutier Landscaping, Inc.

Formal Site Plan Review

August 28, 2017

Page 2


Copyright 2017

14. Solid waste will be collected in a dumpster for disposal off-site and located in the vicinity of

the existing shed and storage trailer that will be removed. No net increase in solid waste

volume.

15. Gated access and no regular public or pedestrian access.

We look forward to reviewing the Formal Site Plan with you and the Planning Board on September 5,

2017.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 798-1158.

Respectfully submitted,


Charles F. Wallace, Jr., P.E. Maine No. 4941

President

Exhibit s:

1. Quit Cla im Deed

2. Warranty Deed (Right -of-Way)

3. Survey Plan

4. Form HHE200 – Subsur face Wastewater Disposa l System

5. Exist ing Condit ions Photographs

6. Nat ional Resource Conserva t ion Service. Custom Soil Resource Repor t for

Androscoggin and Sagadahoc Count ies, Maine

7. Clout ier Landscaping, Inc., Future Condit ions Site Plan #C-002

8. Roof Dra in System

9. Clout ier Landscaping, Inc. Landscape Plan

10. Architectura l Sketches

11. Impervious Sur face Calcula t ions

12. Light ing

13. Clout ier Landscaping, Inc., Zoning Map

14. Topography Map

15. Exist ing Genera l Land Cover

16. Locat ion Map

17. Condit iona l Use Permit Applica t ion

Exhibit 1 - Topsham, Maine95A28B10-4485-4BEC...EXHIBIT A All that parcel of land labeled "N/F Joyce...

Documents

Transcript of Exhibit 1 - Topsham, Maine95A28B10-4485-4BEC...EXHIBIT A All that parcel of land labeled "N/F Joyce...